Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 156
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Obstet Gynecol ; 141(4): 756-763, 2023 04 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36897145

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To examine the cost effectiveness of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination after excisional procedure compared with no vaccination. METHODS: We constructed a decision-analytic model (TreeAge Pro 2021) to compare outcomes between patients who underwent an excisional procedure followed by nonavalent HPV vaccination to those who underwent an excisional procedure without vaccination. Our theoretical cohort contained 250,000 patients, the approximate number undergoing excisional procedures annually in the United States. Our outcomes were costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), recurrence events, number of surveillance Pap tests with co-testing, number of colposcopies, and second excisional procedures. Probabilities of recurrence were based on a recently published meta-analysis. All values were derived from the literature, and QALYs were discounted at a rate of 3%. Outcomes were applied for 4 years after the initial excisional procedure. Our cost-effectiveness threshold was $100,000 per QALY. Sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the robustness of the model. RESULTS: In our theoretical cohort of patients who underwent an excisional procedure, the HPV vaccination strategy was associated with 17,281 fewer recurrences of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) (8,360 fewer cases of CIN 1 and 8,921 fewer cases of CIN 2 or 3), 26,203 fewer Pap tests (1,025,368 vs 1,051,570), 17,281 fewer colposcopies (20,588 vs 37,869), and 8,921 fewer second excisional procedures (4,779 vs 13,701). The vaccination strategy was associated with a higher cost of $135 million. Vaccination was a cost-effective strategy, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $29,181 per QALY, compared with no vaccination. In our sensitivity analyses, the HPV vaccination strategy remained cost effective until the cost of the three-dose HPV vaccine series reached $1,899 or the baseline (nonvaccinated) probability of recurrence was less than 4.8%. CONCLUSION: In our model, HPV vaccination for patients with a prior excisional procedure led to improved outcomes and was cost effective. Our study suggests that clinicians should consider offering the three-dose HPV vaccine series to patients who have undergone an excisional procedure to decrease the risk of CIN recurrence and its sequelae.


Assuntos
Infecções por Papillomavirus , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus , Displasia do Colo do Útero , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero , Feminino , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/cirurgia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/epidemiologia , Análise de Custo-Efetividade , Papillomavirus Humano , Análise Custo-Benefício , Displasia do Colo do Útero/epidemiologia , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida
2.
Arch Gynecol Obstet ; 308(1): 207-218, 2023 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36576558

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Invasive cervical cancer (ICC) is associated in nearly 100% with persistent high-risk Human Papillomavirus (HR-HPV) infection. ICC is still one of the leading causes for cancer mortality in women worldwide. The immunosuppressive influence of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) and the immunocompromised period of pregnancy due to tolerance induction against the hemiallogeneic fetus, are generally risk factors for acquisition and persistence of HR-HPV infections and their progression to precancerous lesions and HPV-associated carcinoma. METHODS: Overall, 81 pregnant women living with HIV (WLWH) were included. A medical history questionnaire was used to record clinical and HIV data. Participants received cervicovaginal cytological smear, colposcopy and HPV testing. HPV test was performed using BSGP5+/6+ PCR with Luminex read-out. The HR-HPV genotypes 16, 18, 31, 33, 45, 52, 58 were additionally grouped together as high-high-risk HPV (HHR-HPV) for the purpose of risk-adapted analysis. RESULTS: HR-HPV prevalence was 45.7%. Multiple HPV infections were detected in 27.2% of participants, of whom all had at least one HR-HPV genotype included. HR-HPV16 and HR-HPV52 were the most prevalent genotypes and found when high squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) was detected by cytology. HIV viral load of ≥ 50 copies/ml was associated with higher prevalence of HR-HPV infections. Whereas, CD4 T cells < 350/µl showed association with occurrence of multiple HPV infections. Time since HIV diagnosis seemed to impact HPV prevalence. CONCLUSION: Pregnant WLWH require particularly attentive and extended HPV-, colposcopical- and cytological screening, whereby clinical and HIV-related risk factors should be taken into account.


Assuntos
Infecções por HIV , Soropositividade para HIV , Infecções por Papillomavirus , Displasia do Colo do Útero , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Infecções por Papillomavirus/complicações , Infecções por Papillomavirus/epidemiologia , Papillomavirus Humano , Gestantes , Estudos Transversais , Estudos Prospectivos , Displasia do Colo do Útero/complicações , Displasia do Colo do Útero/epidemiologia , Displasia do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/patologia , Soropositividade para HIV/complicações , Papillomaviridae/genética , Genótipo , Papillomavirus Humano 16 , Prevalência , Infecções por HIV/complicações , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia
3.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw ; 20(8): 906-914.e10, 2022 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35948040

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We sought to identify the absolute risk of specific HPV genotype for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2/3 or worse (CIN2+/3+) and to develop a risk-based management strategy in an HPV-positive population. METHODS: HPV genotyping was performed based on a 3-year cervical cancer screening cohort. The study endpoints were histologic CIN2+/3+. The prevalence of specific HPV genotype was calculated by minimum, any type, and hierarchical attribution estimate. The absolute CIN2+/3+ risks of specific HPV genotype were estimated and risk-based management strategy was established according to the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology guideline. The efficacy of conventional and risk-based management strategies for non-16/18 HPVs were further evaluated. RESULTS: Eligible data were available for 8,370 women with a median age of 48 years (interquartile range, 42-53 years). At baseline, there were 1,062 women with HPV-positive disease, including 424 with multiple and 639 with single infections. CIN2+/3+ cases represented 113/74, 23/8, 20/7, and 52/31 patients at baseline and first-, second-, and third-year visits, respectively. Women with multiple HPV infections at baseline were more prone to persistent infection than those with single infection (P<.0001). HPV16 and HPV52 were the top 2 ranking among baseline and 3-year cumulative CIN2+/3+ cases. Based on the absolute risk of specific HPV genotype combined with cytology for CIN2+/3+, all non-16/18 HPVs were divided into 4 risk-stratified groups. Compared with conventional strategy, the risk-based strategy had higher specificity (P=.0000) and positive predictive value (P=.0322) to detect CIN3+ and needed fewer colposcopies for each CIN3+ case. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our study findings, we propose a new extended HPV genotyping protocol, which would provide a better strategy for achieving precise risk-based management of HPV-positive populations.


Assuntos
Infecções por Papillomavirus , Displasia do Colo do Útero , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/métodos , Feminino , Genótipo , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Papillomaviridae/genética , Infecções por Papillomavirus/complicações , Infecções por Papillomavirus/diagnóstico , Infecções por Papillomavirus/epidemiologia , Medição de Risco , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/epidemiologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/patologia , Displasia do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Displasia do Colo do Útero/epidemiologia , Displasia do Colo do Útero/patologia
4.
J Obstet Gynaecol Can ; 44(6): 650-657.e1, 2022 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35218935

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Human papillomavirus (HPV) testing can be incorporated into the post-treatment pathway of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) to confirm disease-free status. To inform a post-treatment strategy based on risk of recurrence, we modelled disease and economic outcomes. METHODS: The current Alberta, Canada, post-treatment care pathway-cytology testing with colposcopy assessment-was compared with 6 other scenarios incorporating cytology, HPV testing, or both tests at different time points in a modelling study based on a microsimulation program. Input parameter values for the screening participation, screening age groups, and follow-up options and test compliance for HPV, cytology, and colposcopy were varied, based on Alberta cervical cancer screening program data. Health outcomes over the short- and long-term were projected, which incorporated the increasing population-level coverage of HPV vaccination. Lifetime incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were used to evaluate economic outcomes and descriptive statistics compared with numbers of tests, visits, and procedures as well as changes in incidence and mortality rates between the scenarios. RESULTS: At 5 years after implementation of the "HPV testing alone at 6 and 18 months" post-treatment pathway, the number of colposcopies dropped by 36% and the number of pre-cancer treatments, by 6%. Lifetime ICERs were CAD $6170 versus $248,495 per quality-adjusted life-year compared with the status quo pathway. Cervical cancer incidence and mortality rates decreased significantly and similarly in all scenarios. CONCLUSION: Strategies that involve HPV testing in CIN post-treatment follow-up care are expected to be more cost effective with improved clinical outcomes than traditional cytology and colposcopy-based follow-up.


Assuntos
Infecções por Papillomavirus , Displasia do Colo do Útero , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero , Alberta/epidemiologia , Colposcopia , Procedimentos Clínicos , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Papillomaviridae , Infecções por Papillomavirus/diagnóstico , Gravidez , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/prevenção & controle , Esfregaço Vaginal , Displasia do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Displasia do Colo do Útero/epidemiologia
5.
BJOG ; 129(7): 1104-1111, 2022 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34882962

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Cervical cancer screening guidelines have evolved over time with the incorporation of human papillomavirus (HPV) testing along with cytology. Current screening guidelines recommend cytological screening every 3 years or HPV testing with or without cytology every 5 years in women age 30-65 years. We examined the use of cervical cancer screening among average-risk Medicaid beneficiaries. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. POPULATION: Women age 30-64 years at average risk for cervical cancer who underwent cervical cancer screening with cytology, co-testing or primary HPV testing from 2013 to 2016. METHODS: The IBM Watson Health Multi-State Medicaid MarketScan Database was used. Subsequent screening rates within 3 years of the index test were examined. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The rate of repeat cervical cancer screening was analysed using a cumulative incidence function. RESULTS: A total of 265 083 patients were identified. Overall, 43.1% (n = 114 312) had index co-testing, 55.2% (n = 146 309) had cytology and 1.7% (n = 4462) had primary HPV testing. The cumulative incidence of early, repeat cervical cancer screening was 3.9% at 12 months, 22.7% at 24 months and 33.3% at 36 months. During the period from 12 to 24 months after follow up, 20.9% of women underwent repeat screening while 19.4% underwent repeat screening 24-36 months after the index test. Among women who did not undergo repeat cervical cancer screening, a yearly gynaecological examination was performed in only 16 627 (10.7%) during year 2 and in 11 116 (8.8%) during year 3. CONCLUSION: Among average-risk Medicaid beneficiaries, cervical cancer screening is frequently overused. Women who do not undergo cervical cancer screening are unlikely to undergo routine gynaecological examination. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Among average-risk Medicaid beneficiaries, cervical cancer screening is frequently overused.


Assuntos
Alphapapillomavirus , Infecções por Papillomavirus , Displasia do Colo do Útero , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero , Adulto , Idoso , Colposcopia , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Feminino , Humanos , Programas de Rastreamento , Medicaid , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Papillomaviridae , Infecções por Papillomavirus/complicações , Infecções por Papillomavirus/diagnóstico , Infecções por Papillomavirus/epidemiologia , Gravidez , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/epidemiologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/prevenção & controle , Esfregaço Vaginal , Displasia do Colo do Útero/epidemiologia
6.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev ; 22(8): 2343-2349, 2021 Aug 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34452544

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess the quality of the actions to control cervical cancer (CC) and its correlates. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study conducted from January to March 2019 in 19 municipalities in Bahia, Brazil, with a sample of 241 doctors and nurses from primary health care (PHC). Three dependent variables were chosen- "Performance of educational, promotion, prevention, and monitoring actions" (D1); "Access to diagnostic tests" (D2); "Non-occurrence of high grade cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL)" (D3). Poisson regression with robust variance was used, adopting hierarchical input variables to estimate the prevalence ratios and confidence intervals of 95%. RESULTS: The following prevalence rates were found: D1  39.8% (95% CI: 33.8-46.2); D2  73.9% (95% CI: 67.9-79.1); and D3  46.4% (95% CI: 39.9-53.0). These dimensions remained associated with the dependent variables: D1- having professional training courses on the topic; consideration to ensure that collection takes place appropriately by a professional; and women having access to medical transport; D2- nurses treating low-grade lesions; D3- recording the Papanicolaou in electronic medical records; D1 and D2- professionals joining the service through public tender; D1 and D3- working in the PHC (≥ 2 years); D2 and D3- recording Papanicolaou in physical records; and performance of Papanicolaou by residents. CONCLUSION: Better trained professionals and professionals working in stable work arrangements are associated with comprehensive actions to control CC. Such strategies indicate that investments in work management result in a more organized PHC and more solution-centered work processes. Therefore, working in the PHC for a longer time and nurses performing more clinical actions (collection and treatment) are favored by such organizational actions. Investments in diagnostic support contribute to perceptions of more comprehensive actions to control CC. 
.


Assuntos
Detecção Precoce de Câncer/normas , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Infecções por Papillomavirus/complicações , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/normas , Displasia do Colo do Útero/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/prevenção & controle , Brasil/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Papillomaviridae/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Papillomavirus/virologia , Prognóstico , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/epidemiologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/virologia , Displasia do Colo do Útero/epidemiologia , Displasia do Colo do Útero/virologia
7.
BMC Cancer ; 21(1): 949, 2021 Aug 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34429079

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cytology and HPV genotype screening play an important role in cervical cancer detection. Whether multiple HPV genotyping can predict cytological lesions remains to be further studied. METHODS: Two thousand two hundred twenty-four females were analyzed for cytology and HPV genotypes test. The possibility of predicting cytological lesions by HPV genotypes test was evaluated by multivariate logistic regression and area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC). RESULT: Abnormal cytological results were found in 479 participants. A total of 688 patients were detected with HPV infection, 619 with HR-HPV infection and 112 with LR-HRV infection. HPV-52 was found to be the most common type among these patients, and a relatively higher risk of cervical lesions was found in HPV positive females. HPV-16, 31, 33 and 58 were found to have significantly higher infection rates in patients with HSIL and higher lesions. The prediction model was developed based on age and HPV-specific genotypes, with the AUC of 0.73 for cytological abnormalities and 0.82 for HSIL and higher lesions. CONCLUSION: HPV-16, 31, 33 and 58 infection are significant risk factors for cervical lesions. Combined HPV genotypes test can effectively predict cytological abnormalities.


Assuntos
Citodiagnóstico/métodos , Técnicas Citológicas/métodos , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/métodos , Infecções por Papillomavirus/complicações , Medição de Risco/métodos , Displasia do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Adulto , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Papillomaviridae/isolamento & purificação , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/epidemiologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/virologia , Displasia do Colo do Útero/epidemiologia , Displasia do Colo do Útero/virologia
8.
JNCI Cancer Spectr ; 5(1)2021 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33554035

RESUMO

Background: Human papillomavirus vaccine (HPV) impact on cervical precancer (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grades 2+ [CIN2+]) is observable sooner than impact on cancer. Biopsy-confirmed CIN2+ is not included in most US cancer registries. Billing codes could provide surrogate metrics; however, the International Classification of Diseases, ninth (ICD-9) to tenth (ICD-10) transition disrupts trends. We built, validated, and compared claims-based models to identify CIN2+ events in both ICD eras. Methods: A database of Davidson County (Nashville), Tennessee, pathology-confirmed CIN2+ from the HPV Vaccine Impact Monitoring Project (HPV-IMPACT) provided gold standard events. Using Tennessee Medicaid 2008-2017, cervical diagnostic procedures (N = 8549) among Davidson County women aged 18-39 years were randomly split into 60% training and 40% testing sets. Relevant diagnosis, procedure, and screening codes were used to build models from CIN2+ tissue diagnosis codes alone, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), and random forest. Model-classified index events were counted to estimate incident events. Results: HPV-IMPACT identified 983 incident CIN2+ events. Models identified 1007 (LASSO), 1245 (CIN2+ tissue diagnosis codes alone), and 957 (random forest) incident events. LASSO performed well in ICD-9 and ICD-10 eras: 77.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 72.5% to 81.5%) vs 81.1% (95% CI = 71.5% to 88.6%) sensitivity, 93.0% (95% CI = 91.9% to 94.0%) vs 90.2% (95% CI = 87.2% to 92.7%) specificity, 61.3% (95% CI = 56.6% to 65.8%) vs 60.3% (95% CI = 51.0% to 69.1%) positive predictive value, 96.6% (95% CI = 95.8% to 97.3%) vs 96.3% (95% CI = 94.1% to 97.8%) negative predictive value, 91.0% (95% CI = 89.9% to 92.1%) vs 88.8% (95% CI = 85.9% to 91.2%) accuracy, and 85.1% (95% CI = 82.9% to 87.4%) vs 85.6% (95% CI = 81.4% to 89.9%) C-indices, respectively; performance did not statistically significantly differ between eras (95% confidence intervals all overlapped). Conclusions: Results confirmed model utility with good performance across both ICD eras for CIN2+ surveillance. Validated claims-based models may be used in future CIN2+ trend analyses to estimate HPV vaccine impact where population-based biopsies are unavailable.


Assuntos
Classificação Internacional de Doenças , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/administração & dosagem , Lesões Pré-Cancerosas/prevenção & controle , Displasia do Colo do Útero/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Revisão da Utilização de Seguros , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Lesões Pré-Cancerosas/diagnóstico , Lesões Pré-Cancerosas/epidemiologia , Lesões Pré-Cancerosas/patologia , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Distribuição Aleatória , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Tennessee , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/epidemiologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/patologia , Adulto Jovem , Displasia do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Displasia do Colo do Útero/epidemiologia , Displasia do Colo do Útero/patologia
9.
BJOG ; 128(7): 1226-1235, 2021 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33247993

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine the demand for colposcopy in the Cervical Screening Wales programme after the introduction of human papillomavirus (HPV) cervical screening, which coincided with the start of screening of women vaccinated against HPV types 16/18. DESIGN: The study used a computational model that assigns screening and screening-related colposcopy events to birth cohorts in individual calendar years. SETTING: Cervical Screening Wales. POPULATION: Women aged 25-64 years from birth cohorts 1953-2007. METHODS AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We estimated the numbers of colposcopies and high-grade cervical intraepithelial lesions (CIN2+) within Cervical Screening Wales in 2018-32, using official population projections for Wales and published estimates of the effects of HPV screening and vaccination. RESULTS: Vaccination will reduce the number of colposcopies by 10% within the first 3-4 years after the national roll-out of HPV screening, and by about 20% thereafter. The number of screening colposcopies is estimated to increase from 6100 in 2018 and peak at 8000 (+31%) in 2021, assuming current screening intervals are maintained. The numbers of CIN2+ lesions follow similar patterns, stabilising at around 1000 diagnoses per year by 2026, approximately 60% lower than at present. Extending the screening intervals to 5 years for all women shows similar trends but introduces peaks and troughs over the years. CONCLUSIONS: Vaccination will not fully prevent an increase in colposcopies and detected CIN2+ lesions during the first 2-3 years of HPV-based screening but the numbers are expected to decrease substantially after 5-6 years. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: HPV-based cervical screening will initially increase colposcopy referral. In 6 years, this increase will be reversed, partly by HPV vaccination.


Assuntos
Colposcopia/tendências , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Previsões , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde/tendências , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Idoso , Colposcopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Simulação por Computador , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infecções por Papillomavirus/diagnóstico , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/epidemiologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/virologia , País de Gales/epidemiologia , Displasia do Colo do Útero/epidemiologia , Displasia do Colo do Útero/prevenção & controle , Displasia do Colo do Útero/virologia
12.
BMC Cancer ; 20(1): 645, 2020 Jul 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32660432

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Human papillomavirus (HPV) testing is recommended in primary cervical screening to improve cancer prevention. An advantage of HPV testing is that it can be performed on self-samples, which could increase population coverage and result in a more efficient strategy to identify women at risk of developing cervical cancer. Our objective was to assess whether repeated self-sampling for HPV testing is cost-effective in comparison with Pap smear cytology for detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or more (CIN2+) in increasing participation rate in primary cervical screening. METHODS: A cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) was performed on data from a previously published randomized clinical study including 36,390 women aged 30-49 years. Participants were randomized either to perform repeated self-sampling of vaginal fluid for HPV testing (n = 17,997, HPV self-sampling arm) or to midwife-collected Pap smears for cytological analysis (n = 18,393, Pap smear arm). RESULTS: Self-sampling for HPV testing led to 1633 more screened women and 107 more histologically diagnosed CIN2+ at a lower cost vs. midwife-collected Pap smears (€ 229,446 vs. € 782,772). CONCLUSIONS: This study resulted in that repeated self-sampling for HPV testing increased participation and detection of CIN2+ at a lower cost than midwife-collected Pap smears in primary cervical screening. Offering women a home-based self-sampling may therefore be a more cost-effective alternative than clinic-based screening. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not registered since this trial is a secondary analysis of an earlier published study (Gustavsson et al., British journal of cancer. 118:896-904, 2018).


Assuntos
Análise Custo-Benefício , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/economia , Papillomaviridae/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Papillomavirus/economia , Autocuidado/economia , Manejo de Espécimes/economia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/economia , Adulto , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infecções por Papillomavirus/complicações , Infecções por Papillomavirus/diagnóstico , Infecções por Papillomavirus/virologia , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/epidemiologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/virologia , Displasia do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Displasia do Colo do Útero/economia , Displasia do Colo do Útero/epidemiologia , Displasia do Colo do Útero/virologia
13.
Am Fam Physician ; 102(1): 39-48, 2020 07 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32603071

RESUMO

The practice of colposcopy, a diagnostic procedure to evaluate for vaginal, vulvar, and cervical dysplasia, has evolved to incorporate patient risk factors for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and cancer. Changes in cervical cancer screening and guidelines, human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination recommendations, and colposcopy standards from the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology (ASCCP) have implications for all primary care clinicians, not only those who perform colposcopies. Primary care clinicians should offer HPV vaccination to all patients between the ages of nine and 26, in addition to cervical cancer screening and follow-up guidance. Primary care clinicians should recognize the degrees of risk of high-grade CIN and cancer conferred by cytology, HPV subtype, and persistence of HPV infection. Clinicians should address modifiable risk factors such as tobacco use, and provide counseling to patients about colposcopy based on their individual risks. Clinicians should conduct shared decision-making about immediate loop electrosurgical excision procedure vs. colposcopy with multiple biopsies and endocervical sampling for patients with the highest risk of cervical cancer, and for patients who are older than 25 years with at least two of the following: HPV-16, HPV-18, and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion cytology. Primary care clinicians should be familiar with the 2019 ASCCP guidelines and develop clinic-based systems to ensure appropriate follow-up of abnormal cytology, positive high-risk HPV testing, diagnosed CIN, and cervical cancer. Patients with an abnormal cervical cancer screening history require surveillance, which differs from routine screening for patients with normal prior screening results. Long-term surveillance is recommended for patients with CIN 2 or worse.


Assuntos
Biópsia/métodos , Colposcopia , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Displasia do Colo do Útero , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Colposcopia/métodos , Colposcopia/normas , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infecções por Papillomavirus/diagnóstico , Infecções por Papillomavirus/epidemiologia , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/métodos , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/normas , Atenção Primária à Saúde/métodos , Atenção Primária à Saúde/normas , Medição de Risco/métodos , Fatores de Risco , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/epidemiologia , Conduta Expectante/métodos , Displasia do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Displasia do Colo do Útero/epidemiologia
14.
BMC Public Health ; 20(1): 671, 2020 May 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32398057

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: An infection with high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) is the obligatory aetiological factor for the development of cervical cancer. In Switzerland, the prevention strategy for cervical cancer is based on primary prevention via HPV vaccination and secondary prevention with an opportunistic screening programme for precancerous lesions. Vaccination is recommended to 11-26 years old male and female persons. The objective of the study was to assess the epidemiological impact on cervical cancer of switching from the currently implemented programme with the 4-valent vaccine to the 9-valent vaccine, in an 11-26 years old gender-neutral vaccination programme in Switzerland. METHODS: A previously validated dynamic transmission model of HPV infections was adapted and calibrated to the Swiss setting assuming an 80% coverage rate in HPV-vaccination and lifelong vaccine type-specific protection. A gender-neutral vaccination programme (males and females) for 11-26 years old with a 9-valent HPV vaccine was compared with the current 11-26 years old gender-neutral 4-valent vaccination programme. Sensitivity analyses were conducted in order to test the impact of lower vaccination coverage rates and a shorter duration of protection on the model outcomes. RESULTS: In Switzerland, a 9-valent gender-neutral vaccination programme would result in an additional prevention of 2979 cervical cancer cases, 13,862 CIN3 and 15,000 CIN2 cases, compared with the 4-valent gender-neutral vaccination programme over 100 years. These additional disease cases avoided would correspond to a 24, 36 and 48% cumulative incidence decrease in cervical cancer, CIN3 and CIN2 cases, respectively. It would also prevent additional 741 cervical cancer-related deaths over 100 years. A substantial additional reduction in cervical cancer and precancerous lesions burden is still observed when varying the vaccination coverage rate from 30 to 60% or reducing the duration of protection from lifelong to 20 years. CONCLUSIONS: The switch to the 9-valent vaccine in Switzerland to prevent cervical diseases showed an important contribution in terms of public health impact compared with the 4-valent vaccine in an 11-26 years old gender-neutral population, even with very conservative assumptions such as low coverage rates or low duration of protection and limiting analysis to only cervical disease.


Assuntos
Programas de Imunização/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/economia , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/uso terapêutico , Displasia do Colo do Útero/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/prevenção & controle , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Programas de Rastreamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Suíça/epidemiologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem , Displasia do Colo do Útero/epidemiologia
15.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev ; 21(5): 1317-1325, 2020 May 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32458639

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer is preventable and curable by detected early and managed effectively. To explore the most economical and effective cervical cancer screening strategies would lay a solid foundation for reducing the health and economic burden of cervical cancer. METHODS: A Markov model was established for a cohort of 100,000 female to simulate the natural history of cervical cancer. 18 screening strategies were estimated including careHPV, Thin prep cytologic (TCT), Visual inspection with acetic acid/ Lugol's iodine (VIA / VILI), careHPV in series with VIA / VILI, careHPV in series with TCT, three methods parallel connection every 1, 3, 5 years respectively. Model outcomes included cumulative risk of incidence and death of cervical cancer, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), cost-effectiveness ratios (CERs), incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), cost-utility ratios (CURs) and benefits. RESULTS: According to the results of epidemiological analysis, careHPV similar to the parallel connection every 1 year achieved highest epidemiological effects via reducing the cumulative risk of onset and death by more than 98 %. In health-economic terms, CER among all the screening strategies ranged from -756.34 to 113040.3 Yuan per year and CUR ranged from -169.91 to 11968.27 Yuan per QALY. The benefit ranged from -1629 to 996 Yuan. The incremental cost-effectiveness analysis showed that three methods in parallel every 1 year, TCT every 1 year, VIA/VILI every 1, 3, 5 years and careHPV every 5 years were dominant strategies. CONCLUSION: Considering the economic and health benefits of all the strategies, our results suggested careHPV every 3 or 5 years and VIA/VILI every 1 or 3 years eventually were more appropriate as screening methods in rural China.


Assuntos
Análise Custo-Benefício , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/economia , População Rural/estatística & dados numéricos , Displasia do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Adulto , Estudos de Casos e Controles , China/epidemiologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Cadeias de Markov , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/economia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/epidemiologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/patologia , Displasia do Colo do Útero/economia , Displasia do Colo do Útero/epidemiologia , Displasia do Colo do Útero/patologia
16.
PLoS One ; 15(2): e0228660, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32053648

RESUMO

Until 2018, cervical cancer screening in France was an unorganized individual screening, with the exception of some pilot programs in some territories. We aimed to assess, before the implementation of organized cervical cancer screening and human papillomavirus (HPV) nonavalent vaccine introduction in the vaccination schedule in 2018, (i) the individual cervical cancer screening coverage, (ii) the management of squamous intraepithelial lesions (SIL) and (iii) the related costs. We used the Système National des Données de Santé (SNDS) (Echantillon Généraliste de Bénéficiaires [EGB] and Programme de Médicalisation des systèmes d'information [PMSI]) to assess the cervical screening coverage rate in France between January 1st, 2012 and December 31st, 2014, and to describe diagnostic investigations and therapeutic management of SIL in 2013. After extrapolation to the general population, a total of 10,847,814 women underwent at least one smear test over the 3-year study period, corresponding to a coverage rate of 52.4% of the women aged 25 to 64 included. In 2013, 126,095 women underwent HPV test, 327,444 women underwent colposcopy, and 9,653 underwent endocervical curettage; 31,863 had conization and 12,162 had laser ablation. Besides, 34,067 women experienced hospital stays related to management of SIL; 25,368 (74.5%) had high-grade lesions (HSIL) and 7,388 (21.7%) low-grade lesions (LSIL). Conization was the most frequent in-hospital therapeutic procedure: 89.5% (22,704) of women with an in-hospital procedure for HSIL and 64.7% (4,781) for LSIL. Mean cost of smear test, colposcopy and HPV tests were around 50€. Total cost for hospital stays in 2013 was estimated at M41€, or a mean cost of 1,211€ per woman; 76% were due to stays with HSIL. This study highlights the low coverage rate of individual cervical cancer screening and a high burden related to SIL management.


Assuntos
Detecção Precoce de Câncer/métodos , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Lesões Intraepiteliais Escamosas/diagnóstico , Lesões Intraepiteliais Escamosas/terapia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Adulto , Idoso , Colo do Útero/patologia , Colo do Útero/virologia , Colposcopia/economia , Conização , Estudos Transversais , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/economia , Feminino , França/epidemiologia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Programas de Rastreamento/economia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infecções por Papillomavirus/virologia , Lesões Intraepiteliais Escamosas/economia , Lesões Intraepiteliais Escamosas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/economia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/epidemiologia , Esfregaço Vaginal/economia , Esfregaço Vaginal/métodos , Displasia do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Displasia do Colo do Útero/economia , Displasia do Colo do Útero/epidemiologia , Displasia do Colo do Útero/virologia
17.
AIDS ; 34(1): 73-80, 2020 01 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31789890

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To describe longitudinal changes in the prevalence of abnormal Papanicolau testing among women living with HIV. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study with sequential enrollment subcohorts. METHODS: Four waves of enrollment occurred in the Women's Interagency HIV Study, the US women's HIV cohort (1994-1995, 2001-2002, 2011-2012, 2013-2015). Pap testing was done at intake, with colposcopy prescribed for any abnormality. Rates of abnormal Pap test results (atypical squamous cells of uncertain significance or worse) and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 (CIN2) or worse were calculated. Logistic regression models assessed changes in prevalence across cohorts after controlling for severity of HIV disease and other risk factors for abnormal Pap tests. RESULTS: The unadjusted prevalence of any Pap abnormality was 679/1769 (38%) in the original cohort, 195/684 (29%) in the 2001-2002 cohort, 46/231 (20%) in the 2011-2012 cohort, and 71/449 (16%) in the 2013-2015 cohort. In multivariable analysis, compared with risk in the 1994-1995 cohort, the adjusted risk in the 2001-2002 cohort was 0.79 (95% CI 0.59-1.05), in the 2011-2012 cohort was 0.67 (95% CI 0.43-1.04), and in the 2013-2015 cohort was 0.41 (95% CI 0.27-0.62) with P for trend less than 0.0001. CONCLUSION: Rates of abnormal cytology among women with HIV have fallen during the past two decades.


Assuntos
Colposcopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Teste de Papanicolaou/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções por Papillomavirus/epidemiologia , Displasia do Colo do Útero/epidemiologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/epidemiologia , Adulto , Comorbidade , Feminino , Infecções por HIV/diagnóstico , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Estudos Longitudinais , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Infecções por Papillomavirus/diagnóstico , Prevalência , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Esfregaço Vaginal/estatística & dados numéricos , Displasia do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico
18.
PLoS One ; 14(12): e0226335, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31830114

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: HPV test appears to be more effective in cervical cancer (CC) screening. However, the decision of its adoption as a primary screening method by substituting the established cytology lies in the evaluation of multiple criteria. Aim of this study is to evaluate the economic and clinical impact of HPV test as primary screening method for CC. METHODS: A decision tree and a Markov model were developed to simulate the screening algorithm and the natural history of CC. Fourteen different screening strategies were evaluated, for women 25-65 years old. Clinical inputs were drawn from the HERMES study and cost inputs from the official price lists. In the absence of CC treatment cost data, the respective Spanish costs were used after being converted to 2017 Greek values. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted. RESULTS: All screening strategies, that offer as primary screening method triennial HPV genotyping (simultaneous or reflex) alone or as co-testing with cytology appear to be more effective than all other strategies, with regards to both annual CC mortality, due to missed disease (-10.1), and CC incidence(-7.5) versus annual cytology (current practice). Of those, the strategy with HPV test with simultaneous 16/18 genotyping is the strategy that provides savings of 1.050 million euros annually. However, when the above strategy is offered quinquennially despite the fact that outcomes are decreased it remains more effective than current practice (-7.7 deaths and -1.3 incidence) and more savings per death averted (1.323 million) or incidence reduced (7.837 million) are realized. CONCLUSIONS: HPV 16/18 genotyping as a primary screening method for CC appears to be one of the most effective strategies and dominates current practice in respect to both cost and outcomes. Even when compared with all other strategies, the outcomes that it generates justify the cost that it requires, representing a good value for money alternative.


Assuntos
Análise Custo-Benefício , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/economia , Política de Saúde , Testes de DNA para Papilomavírus Humano/economia , Papillomaviridae/genética , Infecções por Papillomavirus/complicações , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Grécia/epidemiologia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Testes de DNA para Papilomavírus Humano/métodos , Humanos , Incidência , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Papillomaviridae/classificação , Infecções por Papillomavirus/virologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/economia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/epidemiologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/virologia , Displasia do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Displasia do Colo do Útero/economia , Displasia do Colo do Útero/epidemiologia , Displasia do Colo do Útero/virologia
19.
PLoS One ; 14(12): e0226261, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31841543

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: After the early detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), medical surveillance of the precancerous lesions is carried out to control risk factors to avoid the development of cervical cancer. OBJECTIVE: To explore the effects of medical surveillance on the personal and social lives of women undergoing CIN follow-up and treatment. METHODOLOGY: A generic qualitative study using a poststructuralist perspective of risk management was carried out in a gynecology clinic in a public hospital of the Galician Health Care System (Spain). Participants were selected through purposive sampling. The sample consisted of 21 women with a confirmed diagnosis of CIN. Semistructured interviews were recorded and transcribed, and a thematic analysis was carried out, including researcher triangulation to verify the results of the analysis. FINDINGS: Two main themes emerged from the participants' experiences: CIN medical surveillance encounters and risk management strategies are shaped by the biomedical discourse, and the effects of "risk treatment" for patients include (a) profound changes expected of patients, (b) increased patient risk management, and (c) resistance to risk management. While doctors' surveillance aimed to prevent the development of cervical cancer, women felt they were sick because they had to follow strict recommendations over an unspecified period of time and live with the possibility of a life-threatening disease. Clinical risk management resulted in the medicalization of women's personal and social lives and produced great uncertainty. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to conceptualize CIN medical surveillance as an illness experience for patients. It also problematizes the effects of preventative practices in women's lives. Patients deal with great uncertainty, as CIN medical surveillance performed by gynecologists simultaneously trivializes the changes expected of patients and underestimates the effects of medical recommendations on patients' personal wellbeing and social relations.


Assuntos
Medicalização , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Percepção , Vigilância da População , Displasia do Colo do Útero , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero , Adulto , Idoso , Atitude Frente a Saúde , Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente/normas , Progressão da Doença , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/métodos , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/psicologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Programas de Rastreamento/psicologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infecções por Papillomavirus/diagnóstico , Infecções por Papillomavirus/epidemiologia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/patologia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/psicologia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/psicologia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Padrões de Prática Médica/normas , Lesões Pré-Cancerosas/diagnóstico , Lesões Pré-Cancerosas/epidemiologia , Lesões Pré-Cancerosas/psicologia , Lesões Pré-Cancerosas/terapia , Fatores de Risco , Gestão de Riscos/métodos , Gestão de Riscos/normas , Comportamento Social , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/epidemiologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/psicologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/terapia , Adulto Jovem , Displasia do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Displasia do Colo do Útero/epidemiologia , Displasia do Colo do Útero/psicologia , Displasia do Colo do Útero/terapia
20.
Vaccine ; 37(31): 4262-4267, 2019 07 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31248688

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Incidence of high-grade cervical lesions (HGCL) has declined in the U.S following the introduction of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine in 2006. However, many women continue to be diagnosed with HGCLs, including those eligible to receive the vaccine but did not. We determined self-reported barriers to and correlates of HPV vaccination in vaccine-eligible women diagnosed with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grades 2, 2/3, 3 and adenocarcinoma in situ (CIN2+). METHODS: Data from a statewide surveillance system in Connecticut for CIN 2+ during 2008-2015 were used for this analysis. Enhanced surveillance data were collected for women residing in New Haven County, including HPV vaccine history and demographic factors, through chart review and patient interviews. Women who reported being unvaccinated were asked why they did not receive the vaccine. We evaluated trends in reasons for not receiving the vaccine using a two-sided Cochran Armitage trend test. Log-binomial analysis was used to assess associations between sociodemographic characteristics and vaccination status. RESULTS: Between 2008 and 2015, 1625 vaccine-eligible women were diagnosed with CIN2+, with 882 of these women reporting never receiving the HPV vaccine. The proportion of unvaccinated vaccine-eligible women did not significantly change from 2008 to 2015 (p = 0.18, range 49.1% to 60.0%). The most commonly reported reason for being unvaccinated was age/too old, followed by previous HPV diagnosis and no provider recommendation. Women who had public or no insurance were significantly more likely than privately insured women to report being unvaccinated (p = <0.001, p = 0.0034). CONCLUSIONS: Commonly cited barriers to vaccination, such as age/too old and previous HPV diagnosis, are not contraindications for vaccination. Furthermore, frequent reporting of no provider recommendation underscores the important role providers play in the immunization of their patients. These results indicate the need for greater efforts by providers to dispel myths about HPV vaccine eligibility and to promote vaccination for all of their eligible patients.


Assuntos
Infecções por Papillomavirus/complicações , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/imunologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/epidemiologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/etiologia , Vacinação , Adulto , Connecticut/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Seguro Saúde , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Infecções por Papillomavirus/epidemiologia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/administração & dosagem , Prevalência , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/prevenção & controle , Adulto Jovem , Displasia do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Displasia do Colo do Útero/epidemiologia , Displasia do Colo do Útero/etiologia , Displasia do Colo do Útero/prevenção & controle
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA