Integrative Assessment of Cardiopulmonary Fitness Using Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test With Supine Bicycle Echocardiography in Patients Presenting Dyspnea.

BACKGROUND: Cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) with supine bicycle echocardiography (SBE) enables comprehensive physiologic assessment during exercise. We characterized cardiopulmonary fitness by integrating CPET-SBE parameters and evaluated its prognostic value in patients presenting with dyspnea. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively reviewed 473 consecutive patients who underwent CPET-SBE for dyspnea evaluation. A dimensionality reduction process was applied, transforming 24 clinical and CPET-SBE parameters into a 2-dimensional feature map, followed by patient clustering based on the data distribution. Clinical and exercise features were compared among the clusters in addition to the 5-year risk of clinical outcome (a composite of cardiovascular death and heart failure hospitalization). Maximum exercise effort (R >1) was achieved in 95% of cases. Through dimensionality reduction, 3 patient clusters were derived: Group 1 (n=157), 2 (n=104), and 3 (n=212). Median age and female proportion increased from Group 1 to 2, and 3, although resting echocardiography parameters showed no significant abnormalities among the groups. There was a worsening trend in the exercise response from Group 1 to 2 and 3, including left ventricular diastolic function, oxygen consumption, and ventilatory efficiency. During follow-up (median 6.0 [1.6-10.4] years), clinical outcome increased from Group 1 to 2 and 3 (5-year rate 3.7% versus 7.0% versus 13.0%, respectively; log-rank P=0.02), with higher risk in Group 2 (hazard ratio, 1.94 [95% CI, 0.52-7.22]) and Group 3 (3.92 [1.34-11.42]) compared with Group 1. CONCLUSIONS: Comprehensive evaluation using CPET-SBE can reveal distinct characteristics of cardiopulmonary fitness in patients presenting with dyspnea, potentially enhancing outcome prediction.

Assessment of acute asthma in children: do parents and healthcare providers speak the same language?

OBJECTIVE: Education and self-management plans enhance parents' self-efficacy in managing their child's asthma symptoms. By understanding how parents recognize and interpret acute asthma symptoms, we can compile patient information using terms that are familiar to parents. METHOD: Semi-structured interviews were carried out with 27 parents of children with asthma aged 2-12 years. The interviewees were selected from three groups: parents of children admitted for acute asthma, parents of children receiving outpatient asthma care, and parents who had access to a self-management plan. Parents were invited to report symptoms they would associate with acute asthma. Subsequently, parents were queried about their recognition of symptoms from a predefined list and asked to explain how they would assess these symptoms in case their child would experience an attack of acute asthma. RESULTS: The most frequently reported symptoms for acute asthma were shortness of breath (77.8%) and coughing (63%). Other signs such as retractions, nasal flaring, and wheezing were reported by less than 25% of the parents. All parents recognized shortness of breath, wheezing and gasping for breath from a predefined list of medical terms. Retractions and nasal flaring were recognized by 81.5% and 66.7% of the parents, respectively. Recognizing the medical terms did not necessarily translate into parents being able to explain how to assess these symptoms. CONCLUSION: Parents and healthcare professionals do not always speak the same language concerning symptoms of acute asthma. This may hamper timely recognition and adequate self-management, highlighting the necessity to adjust current medical information about acute asthma.

Education and self-management plans enhance parents' self-efficacy in managing their child's asthma symptoms.Parents may identify symptoms of acute asthma differently than healthcare providersInformation material about acute asthma should be adjusted to empower parents to decide when to commence treatment and when to seek medical attention.

Early Evidence of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Obscured by Race-Specific Prediction Equations.

Rationale: The identification of early chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is essential to appropriately counsel patients regarding smoking cessation, provide symptomatic treatment, and eventually develop disease-modifying treatments. Disease severity in COPD is defined using race-specific spirometry equations. These may disadvantage non-White individuals in diagnosis and care. Objectives: Determine the impact of race-specific equations on African American (AA) versus non-Hispanic White individuals. Methods: Cross-sectional analyses of the COPDGene (Genetic Epidemiology of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) cohort were conducted, comparing non-Hispanic White (n = 6,766) and AA (n = 3,366) participants for COPD manifestations. Measurements and Main Results: Spirometric classifications using race-specific, multiethnic, and "race-reversed" prediction equations (NHANES [National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey] and Global Lung Function Initiative "Other" and "Global") were compared, as were respiratory symptoms, 6-minute-walk distance, computed tomography imaging, respiratory exacerbations, and St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire. Application of different prediction equations to the cohort resulted in different classifications by stage, with NHANES and Global Lung Function Initiative race-specific equations being minimally different, but race-reversed equations moving AA participants to more severe stages and especially between the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) stage 0 and preserved ratio impaired spirometry groups. Classification using the established NHANES race-specific equations demonstrated that for each of GOLD stages 1-4, AA participants were younger, had fewer pack-years and more current smoking, but had more exacerbations, shorter 6-minute-walk distance, greater dyspnea, and worse BODE (body mass index, airway obstruction, dyspnea, and exercise capacity) scores and St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire scores. Differences were greatest in GOLD stages 1 and 2. Race-reversed equations reclassified 774 AA participants (43%) from GOLD stage 0 to preserved ratio impaired spirometry. Conclusions: Race-specific equations underestimated disease severity among AA participants. These effects were particularly evident in early disease and may result in late detection of COPD.

The clinical utility of the Breathing Pattern Assessment Tool (BPAT) to identify dysfunctional breathing (DB) in individuals living with postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS).

BACKGROUND: Dysfunctional breathing (DB) resulting in inappropriate breathlessness is common in individuals living with postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS). DB in POTS is complex, multifactorial, and not routinely assessed clinically outside of specialist centres. To date DB in POTS has been identified and diagnosed predominately via cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPEX), hyperventilation provocation testing and/or specialist respiratory physiotherapy assessment. The Breathing Pattern Assessment Tool (BPAT) is a clinically validated diagnostic tool for DB in Asthma. There are, however, no published data regarding the use of the BPAT in POTS. The aim of this study was therefore to assess the potential clinic utility of the BPAT in the diagnosis of DB in individuals with POTS. METHODS: A retrospective observational cohort study of individuals with POTS referred to respiratory physiotherapy for formal assessment of DB. DB was determined by specialist respiratory physiotherapist assessment which included physical assessment of chest wall movement/breathing pattern. The BPAT and Nijgmegen questionnaire were also completed. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was used to compare the physiotherapy assessment based diagnosis of DB to the BPAT score. RESULTS: Seventy-seven individuals with POTS [mean (sd) age 32 (11) years, 71 (92 %) female] were assessed by a specialist respiratory physiotherapist, with 65 (84 %) being diagnosed with DB. Using the established BPAT cut off of four or more, receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis indicated a sensitivity of 87 % and specificity of 75 % for diagnosing DB in individuals with POTS with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.901 (95 % CI 0.803-0.999), demonstrating excellent discriminatory ability. CONCLUSION: BPAT has high sensitivity and moderate specificity for identifying DB in individuals living with POTS.

[Assessment of inhalation technique in patients with bronchial asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease].

AIM: Investigate inhalation techniques using different inhalers types and their effect on the course of disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 110 patients with asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease using the inhaler at least one month. Inhaler errors performed during demonstration were evaluated for each patient and entered in the check-lists. We also collected information about co-morbidities, education, mMRC dyspnea score, rate of exacerbations, and performed spirometry. RESULTS: 80.9% of patients used metered-dose inhaler, 20.9% - single-dose and 21.8% - multiple-dose dry powder inhaler, 22.7% - soft-mist inhaler. Inhaler errors were made by 80.9% patients. The mean number of mistakes in metered-dose inhaler use was 2±1.6, single-dose powder inhaler -1.5±1.3, multiple-dose dry powder inhaler - 1.25±1.4, soft-mist inhaler - 0.68±0.7 (р=0.003). Age, diagnosis, duration of disease, education level, inhalers usage by relatives have no influence on the inhalation technique. A number of errors was related to female gender (р=0.007) and usage of more than 2 inhalers (r=0.3, p=0.002), previous instruction about inhalation technique (r=0.3, p=0.001). On the other hand, there were correlations between the number of errors and degree of bronchial obstruction, asthma control, severity of dyspnea by mMRC score, exacerbation rate. CONCLUSION: Patients with bronchoobstructive diseases perform many inhaler errors, that substantially influences the severity and course of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Exercise induced laryngeal obstruction (EILO) in children and young people: Approaches to assessment and management.

Exercise Induced Laryngeal Obstruction (EILO) is characterised by breathlessness, cough and/or noisy breathing particularly during high intensity exercise. EILO is a subcategory of inducible laryngeal obstruction where exercise is the trigger that provokes inappropriate transient glottic or supraglottic narrowing. It is a common condition affecting 5.7-7.5% of the general population and is a key differential diagnosis for young athletes presenting with exercise related dyspnoea where prevalence rates go as high as 34%. Although the condition has been recognised for a long time, little attention, and awareness of the condition results in many young people dropping out of sporting participation due to troublesome symptoms. With evolving understanding of the condition, diagnostic tests and interventions, this review looks to present the current available evidence and best practice when managing young people with EILO.

Assessment of E/A ratio helps emergency clinicians in the management of patients with acute dyspnea.

Acute dyspnea (AD) is one of the main reasons for admission to the Emergency Department (ED). In the last years integrated ultrasound examination (IUE) of lung, heart and inferior vena cava (IVC) has become an extension of clinical examination for a fast differential diagnosis. The aim of present study is to assess the feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of E/A ratio for diagnosing acute heart failure (aHF) in patients with acute dyspnea. We included 92 patients presenting to the ED of CTO Hospital in Naples (Italy) for AD. All patients underwent IUE of lung-heart-IVC with a portable ultrasound device. Left ventricle diastolic function was assessed using pulse wave doppler at the tips of the mitral valve and E wave velocity and E/A ratio were recorded. The FINAL diagnosis was determined by two expert reviewers: acute HF or non-acute HF (non-aHF). We used 2 × 2 contingency tables to analyze sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive and negative predictive value of ultrasound parameters for the diagnosis of AD, comparing with the FINAL diagnosis. Lung ultrasound (LUS) showed high sensitivity, good specificity and accuracy in identification of patients with aHF. However, the highest accuracy was obtained by diastolic function parameters. The E/A ratio showed the highest diagnostic performance with an AUC for aHF of 0.93. In patients presenting with AD, E/A ratio is easy to obtain in a fast ultrasound protocol and showed an excellent accuracy for diagnosis of aHF.

[The role of the physiotherapist in the assessment and management of dyspnea]. / Le rôle du kinésithérapeute dans l'évaluation et la gestion de la dyspnée.

The role of the physiotherapist in the assessment and management of dyspnea. Dyspnea is the most common symptom in cardio-respiratory diseases. Recently improved comprehension of dyspnea mechanisms have underlined the need for three-faceted assessment. The three key aspects correspond to the "breathing, thinking, functioning" clinical model, which proposes a multidimensional - respiratory, emotional and functional - approach. Before initiating treatment, it is essential for several reasons to assess each specific case, determining the type of dyspnea affecting the patient, appraising the impact of shortness of breath, and estimating the effectiveness of the treatment applied. The physiotherapist has a major role to assume in the care of dyspneic patients, not only in assessment followed by treatment but also as a major collaborator in a multidisciplinary team, especially with regard to pulmonary rehabilitation. The aim of this review is to inventory the existing assessment tools and the possible physiotherapies for dyspnea, using a holistic approach designed to facilitate the choice of techniques and to improve quality of care by fully addressing the patient's needs.

Dyspnea assessment in myotonic dystrophy type 1.

In myotonic mystrophy type 1 (DM1), combining respiratory symptom screening and respiratory function testing, is crucial to identify the appropriate time for ventilatory support initiation. Dyspnea has been little investigated in DM1. To provide a multidimensional description of dyspnea, questionnaires assessing dyspnea were administered to 34 consecutive adult patients with DM1 (median (25th-75th centile) age of 36 (28-49), Vital Capacity (VC) of 74 (64-87)% of predicted value). Dyspnea scores were low whatever the questionnaire used: Multidimensional Dyspnea Profile score of 2(0-4.7)/50 for dyspnea sensory descriptor and of 0 (0-4.7)/60 for the emotional descriptor, Visual Analogue Scale score of 0 (0-0)/10 in sitting and supine position and Borg score after six-minute walk test (6MWT) of 2.2 (1.8-4.2)/10. Eleven patients (32%) reported disabling dyspnea in daily living (modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) score ≥ 2). In comparison with patients with mMRC score < 2, patients with mMRC score ≥ 2 had a more severe motor handicap (Muscular Impairment Rating score of 4.0 (4.0-4.0) vs 3.0 (2.0-3.5), p<0.01), a lower 6MWT distance (373 (260-424) vs 436 (346-499)m, p = 0.03) and a lower VC (64 (48-74)% vs 75 (69-89)%, p = 0.02). These data suggest that the mMRC scale might be an easy-to-use and useful tool to assess dyspnea in daily living in DM1 patients. However, the interest of integrating the mMRC dyspnea scale in clinical practice to guide therapeutic management of DM1 patients remains to be assessed in further studies.

Patient reported voice handicap and auditory-perceptual voice assessment outcomes in patients with COVID-19.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to compare patient-reported voice handicap and auditory-perceptual measures of voice between healthy individuals and COVID-19 patients, as well as to investigate the effect of clinical factors on voice quality. METHODS: COVID-19 patients (n = 138) and 90 healthy controls were included in the study. The Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) was used to grade voice samples based on overall severity, roughness, breathiness, strain, pitch, and loudness. The Voice Handicap Index-10 was completed by all participants (VHI-10). Physical (pVHI), emotional (eVHI) and functional (fVHI) subscores were calculated. Clinical data were collected (disease stage, CT grade, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, CRP, and symptoms). RESULTS: A statistically significant difference between patient and control groups in VHI-10 and CAPE-V scores was detected (p < 0.001). Except eVHI, total score and all subscale scores were higher in patients with COVID-19 as the pVHI was the most affected (η2 = 0.324) subscale. All scores of CAPE-V were significantly worse in patients with COVID-19 as highest impact of COVID-19 was on breathiness (η2 = 0.518). Pre-existing pulmonary comorbidity, dyspnoea and N/L was significantly associated with the VHI-10 overall score (ßpc = 4.27, ßdyspnoea = 5.69 and ßnl = 0.25). The overall severity of CAPE-V was significantly dependent on dyspnoea and pulmonary comorbidity (ßdyspnoea = 11.25, ßpc = 10.12). VHI ≥4 and CAPE-V overall severity ≥11 were good indicators of COVID-19 related dysphonia. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 causes patient-reported voice handicap and deteriorates auditory-perceptual measures of voice. COVID-19 related voice impairment was mainly associated with the decreased respiratory capacity.

Hemodynamic force assessment by cardiovascular magnetic resonance in HFpEF: A case-control substudy from the HFpEF stress trial.

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains challenging. Exercise-stress testing is recommended in case of uncertainty; however, this approach is time-consuming and costly. Since preserved EF does not represent normal systolic function, we hypothesized comprehensive cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) assessment of cardiac hemodynamic forces (HDF) may identify functional abnormalities in HFpEF. METHODS: The HFpEF Stress Trial (DZHK-17; Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03260621) prospectively recruited 75 patients with exertional dyspnea, preserved EF (≥50%) and signs of diastolic dysfunction (E/e' ≥8) on echocardiography. Patients underwent rest and exercise-stress right heart catheterisation, echocardiography and CMR. The final study cohort consisted of 68 patients (HFpEF n = 34 and non-cardiac dyspnea n = 34 according to pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP)). HDF assessment included left ventricular (LV) longitudinal, systolic peak and impulse, systolic/diastolic transition, E-wave deceleration as well as A-wave acceleration forces. Follow-up after 24 months evaluated cardiovascular mortality and hospitalisation (CVH) - only two patients were lost to follow-up. FINDINGS: HDF assessment revealed impairment of LV longitudinal function in patients with HFpEF compared to non-cardiac dyspnoea (15.8% vs. 18.3%, p = 0.035), attributable to impairment of systolic peak (38.6% vs 51.6%, p = 0.003) and impulse (20.8% vs. 24.5%, p = 0.009) forces as well as late diastolic filling (-3.8% vs -5.4%, p = 0.029). Early diastolic filling was impaired in HFpEF patients identified at rest compared with patients identified during stress only (7.7% vs. 9.9%, p = 0.004). Impaired systolic peak was associated with CVH (HR 0.95, p = 0.016), and was superior to LV global longitudinal strain assessment in prediction of CVH (AUC 0.76 vs. 0.61, p = 0.048). INTERPRETATION: Assessment of HDF indicates impairment of LV systolic ejection force in HFpEF which is associated with cardiovascular events. FUNDING: German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK).

A systematic review on the effectiveness and impact of clinical decision support systems for breathlessness.

Breathlessness is a common presenting symptom in practice. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the impact of CDSS on breathlessness and associated diseases in real-world clinical settings. Studies published between 1 January 2000 to 10 September 2021 were systematically obtained from 14 electronic research databases including CENTRAL, Embase, Pubmed, and clinical trial registries. Main outcomes of interest were patient health outcomes, provider use, diagnostic concordance, economic evaluation, and unintended consequences. The review protocol was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020163141). A total of 4294 records were screened and 37 studies included of which 30 were RCTs. Twenty studies were in primary care, 13 in hospital outpatient/emergency department (ED), and the remainder mixed. Study duration ranged from 2 weeks to 5 years. Most were adults (58%). Five CDSS were focused on assessment, one on assessment and management, and the rest on disease-specific management. Most studies were disease-specific, predominantly focused on asthma (17 studies), COPD (2 studies), or asthma and COPD (3 studies). CDSS for COPD, heart failure, and asthma in adults reported clinical benefits such as reduced exacerbations, improved quality of life, improved patient-reported outcomes or reduced mortality. Studies identified low usage as the main barrier to effectiveness. Clinicians identified dissonance between CDSS recommendations and real-world practice as a major barrier. This review identified potential benefits of CDSS implementation in primary care and outpatient services for adults with heart failure, COPD, and asthma in improving diagnosis, compliance with guideline recommendations, promotion of non-pharmacological interventions, and improved clinical outcomes including mortality.

Comparing recalled versus experienced symptoms of breathlessness ratings: An ecological assessment study using mobile phone technology.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Recall of breathlessness is important for clinical care but might differ from the experienced (momentary) symptoms. This study aimed to characterize the relationship between momentary breathlessness ratings and the recall of the experience. It is hypothesized that recall is influenced by the peak (worst) and end (most recent) ratings of momentary breathlessness (peak-end rule). METHODS: This study used mobile ecological momentary assessment (mEMA) for assessing breathlessness in daily life through an application installed on participants' mobile phones. Breathlessness ratings (0-10 numerical rating scale) were recorded throughout the day and recalled each night and at the end of the week. Analyses were performed using regular and mixed linear regression. RESULTS: Eighty-four people participated. Their mean age was 64.4 years, 60% were female and 98% had modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) ≥ 1. The mean number of momentary ratings of breathlessness provided was 7.7 ratings/participant/day. Recalled breathlessness was associated with the mean, peak and end values of the day. The mean was most closely associated with the daily recall. Associations were strong for weekly values: peak breathlessness (beta = 0.95, r2  = 0.57); mean (beta = 0.91, r2  = 0.53); and end (beta = 0.67, r2  = 0.48); p < 0.001 for all. Multivariate analysis showed that peak breathlessness had the strongest influence on the breathlessness recalled at the end of the week. CONCLUSION: Over 1 week, recalled breathlessness is most strongly influenced by the peak breathlessness; over 1 day, it is mean breathlessness that participants most readily recalled.

Assessment and diagnosis of chronic dyspnoea: a literature review.

Dyspnoea or breathlessness is a common presenting symptom among patients attending primary care services. This review aimed to determine whether there are clinical tools that can be incorporated into a clinical decision support system for primary care for efficient and accurate diagnosis of causes of chronic dyspnoea. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and Google Scholar for all literature published between 1946 and 2020. Studies that evaluated a clinical algorithm for assessment of chronic dyspnoea in patients of any age group presenting to physicians with chronic dyspnoea were included. We identified 326 abstracts, 55 papers were reviewed, and eight included. A total 2026 patients aged between 20-80 years were included, 60% were women. The duration of dyspnoea was three weeks to 25 years. All studies undertook a stepwise or algorithmic approach to the assessment of dyspnoea. The results indicate that following history taking and physical examination, the first stage should include simply performed tests such as pulse oximetry, spirometry, and electrocardiography. If the patient remains undiagnosed, the second stage includes investigations such as chest x-ray, thyroid function tests, full blood count and NT-proBNP. In the third stage patients are referred for more advanced tests such as echocardiogram and thoracic CT. If dyspnoea remains unexplained, the fourth stage of assessment will require secondary care referral for more advanced diagnostic testing such as exercise tests. Utilising this proposed stepwise approach is expected to ascertain a cause for dyspnoea for 35% of the patients in stage 1, 83% by stage 3 and >90% of patients by stage 4.

Dyspnea in Patients with Advanced Stage Cancer: A Nurses Guide to Assessment and Treatment.

OBJECTIVE: To provide oncology nurses with education on the specific distressing symptom of dyspnea in patients with advanced cancer, including proper assessment and a hierarchical approach to both nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic dyspnea interventions. DATA SOURCES: Sources include published research findings, literature reviews, and guidelines, as well as professional opinion from practicing nurses and clinicians. CONCLUSION: Individuals with advanced cancer often experience the distressing respiratory symptom, dyspnea. Assessment tools and treatment recommendations and guidelines are available for clinicians to appropriately evaluate and treat dyspnea. Improved awareness of symptom presence and treatment options will assist nurses in advocating for their patients with advanced cancer and obtaining and delivering the necessary treatments for dyspnea relief. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Published evidence supports the many treatment options available for dyspnea relief at varying levels. Assessment, individualized treatment, education, and reassessment are key and ongoing to assist patients with advanced cancer to achieve respiratory comfort.

Assessment of dyspnea in sarcoidosis using the Baseline Dyspnea Index (BDI) and the Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI).

INTRODUCTION: The Borg and Modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scales have been used to evaluate dyspnea in sarcoidosis. The Baseline Dyspnea Index (BDI) and Transitional Dyspnea Index (TDI) are useful for the assessment of dyspnea in COPD. It is not known if the BDI-TDI accurately assesses dyspnea in sarcoidosis patients. METHODS: Data was analyzed from the Registry for Advanced Sarcoidosis (ReAS), a multi-national database enrolling patients with advanced sarcoidosis and a comparison group of sarcoidosis patients with non-advanced disease. At baseline, patients completed a BDI questionnaire along with spirometry, 6-min walk distance (6MWD), mMRC, Borg score, fatigue assessment score (FAS) and HRQoL assessments using Kings Sarcoidosis Questionnaire (KSQ) and St Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). At 12-months, patients with advanced disease completed a TDI questionnaire along with the other measures. Correlations between BDI and baseline variables, and between TDI and changes in baseline variables were evaluated. RESULTS: There was significant correlation (p < 0.001 for all) between BDI and baseline 6MWD (rho = 0.336), FVC% (rho = 0.387), FEV1% (rho = 0.285), DLCO% (rho = 0.355), mMRC (rho = -0.721), Borg score (rho = -0.389), FAS (rho = -0.669), SGRQ (rho = -0.785), and KSQ (rho = 0.318 to 0.724). At follow-up, TDI correlated with BDI, but not with changes in pulmonary function or other dyspnea measures. CONCLUSION: BDI scores correlated with pulmonary function, 6MWD, and other dyspnea measures. TDI scores did not correlate with changes in pulmonary function or other dyspnea measures. BDI may be a useful independent measure of dyspnea in sarcoidosis patients. The role of TDI needs further evaluation in longitudinal studies associated with changes in clinical parameters.

Confirmatory Evaluation of the Modified Medical Research Council Questionnaire for Assessment of Dyspnea in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Portugal.

INTRODUCTION: The Modified British Medical Research Council Questionnaire is considered an adequate and simple measure of breathlessness in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. It is widely used in clinical practice in Portugal, but it still lacks confirmatory evaluation for the Portuguese setting. The aim of this study was to perform a cultural adaptation and validation of the Modified British Medical Research Council Questionnaire so that its most suitable version can be made available to researchers and clinicians in Portugal. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional descriptive study involving patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease aged 40 years or older. We applied the Modified British Medical Research Council Questionnaire and the previously validated Portuguese-language version of the clinical questionnaire for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease between January and June 2019. We determined the agreement between the two questionnaires with kappa agreement, with a 95% confidence interval, and we used Spearman correlation to find a correlation between two scores. RESULTS: The study included 65 patients managed in a hospital pulmonology clinic (aged 68 ± 7 years; with predicted FEV1 of 49.86% ± 16.5%). The Modified British Medical Research Council scale correlated significantly with all the domains and the overall score of the clinical questionnaire for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (0.46 < r < 0.68; p < 0.001). In bilingual patients, interclass correlation coefficient was 0.912 (p < 0.001). DISCUSSION: Our study showed that the Portuguese-language version of the Modified British Medical Research Council Questionnaire is feasible and externally valid when compared with a traditional and previously validated instrument. CONCLUSION: The Portuguese version of the Modified British Medical Research Council Questionnaire is a valid instrument for measurement of breathlessness in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Introdução: O Questionário British Medical Research Council (mMRC) Modificado é considerado um instrumento adequado e simples para a medição da dispneia na doença pulmonar obstrutiva crónica (DPOC). Tem sido amplamente usado na prática clínica em Portugal, mas carece de avaliação confirmatória para o cenário português. O objetivo deste estudo é realizar a adaptação cultural e validação do Questionário British Medical Research Council Modificado para que a versão mais adequada possa estar disponível a investigadores e clínicos em Portugal. Material e Métodos: Realizamos um estudo descritivo e transversal com doentes com doença pulmonar obstrutiva crónica e idade ≥ 40 anos. Aplicamos o Questionário British Medical Research Council Modificado e o questionário clínico para a doença pulmonar obstrutiva crónica previamente validado para a língua portuguesa, entre janeiro e junho de 2019. Determinámos a concordância entre os dois questionários com kappa agreement, com 95% de intervalo de confiança, e usámos o coeficiente de correlação de Spearman para determinar a correlação entre os dois scores. Resultados: O estudo incluiu 65 doentes seguidos em consulta hospitalar de Pneumologia (idades de 68 ± 7 anos; com FEV1 49,86% ± 16,5% do predito). A Escala Modificada do British Medical Research Council correlacionou-se significativamente com todos os domínios e pontuação total do questionário clínico (0,46 < r < 0,68; p < 0,001). Nos doentes bilingues, o coeficiente de correlação interclasse foi 0,912 (p < 0,001). Discussão: O nosso estudo mostrou que a versão portuguesa do Questionário Modificado do British Medical Research Council apresenta exequibilidade e validade externa quando comparado com um instrumento tradicional e previamente validado. Conclusão: A versão portuguesa do Questionário Modificado do British Medical Research Council é um instrumento válido para a medição da dispneia na doença pulmonar obstrutiva crónica.

Assessment of peak inspiratory flow in the management of acute inspiratory dyspnoea.

PURPOSE: Assessment of inspiratory dyspnoea associated with upper airway obstruction is based on subjective clinical and nasal fibreoptic laryngoscopy (NFL) signs. The aim of this study was to determine whether peak inspiratory flow (PIF) measurement could indicate the need for upper airway release surgery in patients with acute inspiratory dyspnoea during emergency. METHODS: A retrospective single-institution study (February 2018-March 2020) of 48 patients with acute inspiratory dyspnoea and PIF measurement (Peak Flow In-Check Dial G16®-Harlow-England) was conducted. The surgical decision was based on the clinical evaluation of the patient's respiratory tolerance and NFL. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients were included in this study. Thirty-five patients underwent surgery (PIF: 36 L/min), and 13 patients did not (PIF: 58 L/min) (p = 0.0009). Three of these 13 patients underwent an operation later (PIF value: 42 L/min versus 63 L/min for the 10 others [p = 0.25]). CONCLUSION: PIF measurement is a quantitative, objective, inexpensive, non-invasive, and quick test that is potentially useful for general practitioners, mobile medical teams, or for ear-nose-and-throat specialists. A threshold of 42 L/min can help doctors in emergency decision making to refer patients to an ear-nose-and-throat specialist to release the upper airway and perform surgery or to choose medical monitoring for patients with emergency inspiratory dyspnoea.

The comfort assessment in healthy adults during constant-flow mode in noninvasive ventilator.

BACKGROUND: From the point of view of machine construction and hydrodynamics, this paper innovatively proposes that the essence of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is a constant-flow mode in noninvasive ventilator (NIVCFM). This study enrolled healthy adults as study subjects to assess the subjective comfort assessed by visual analog scoring scale of NIVCFM/HFNC and objective comfort measured by the noise level generated by NIVCFM/HFNC, aiming to provide a scientific basis for the rational clinical application of NIVCFM/HFNC. METHODS: Forty-four healthy adults participated in this study. The noise generated by NIVCFM/HFNC is measured, and the comfort is evaluated during NIVCFM delivery at flow rates of 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, and 60 L/min. RESULTS: When the ventilator flow rate is 60 L/min, the maximum noise is 65.9 dB, increasing noise by 23.7 dB from a baseline of 42.2 dB at the flow rate of 0 L/min. There was a strong nonlinear positive correlation between the noise level and the flow rates. The median score for dry mouth, nose or throat, dysphagia, sore throat, and other discomfort was 0. The median score for dyspnea was 0 at 0-30 L/min, 1 at 35-55 L/min, and 2 at 60 L/min. CONCLUSIONS: The grater the flow rate, the greater the noise generated by NIVCFM/HFNC (<65.9 dB). The maximum flow rate that most healthy adults can able to tolerate is 30 L/min, and the main discomfort is dyspnea.