Post-diuretic spot urine sodium assessment in acute heart failure: a retrospective analysis.

AIMS: To provide real-world data on post-diuretic spot urine sodium concentration (UNa) assessment in acute heart failure (AHF) and its implications for treatment. METHODS AND RESULTS: Automated query of the electronic medical record identified patients admitted to the cardiac intensive care unit of a single tertiary care hospital between November 2018 and December 2021, who received intravenous loop diuretics. Detailed manual chart review confirmed the AHF diagnosis. Stratification was performed based on whether post-diuretic UNa was assessed within 24 h of admission. AHF was confirmed in 340/380 identified patients. Post-diuretic UNa was assessed in 117 (34%), more frequently when ejection fraction was reduced and heart failure more advanced. Patients with versus without post-diuretic UNa assessment received higher doses of intravenous loop diuretics and more frequently acetazolamide and thiazide-like diuretics (p < 0.001 for all), resulting in similar urine output despite more advanced heart failure [2,488 mL (1,740-4,033 mL) vs. 2,400 mL (1,553-3,250 mL), respectively; p = 0.170]. Diuretic therapy remained more intense at discharge in the post-diuretic UNa group, with also a higher prescription rate of angiotensin-neprilysin inhibitors (p = 0.021). Serum creatinine increases/decreases were similarly frequent irrespectively from UNa assessment, with more dynamic changes observed in patients with UNa ≤ 80 mmol/L versus ≥ 81 mmol/L. After adjustments for baseline characteristics, the risk for death or heart failure readmission was similar in patients with versus without UNa assessment [HR (95%CI) = 1.43 (0.88-2.32); p = 0.150]. CONCLUSION: Post-diuretic UNa assessment in AHF was associated with more intense diuretic regimens, preserving urine output despite its use in a sicker population.

Semi-quantitative pulmonary congestion score: prevalence and diuretic management implications after heart failure discharge.

INTRODUCTION: Persistent congestion after heart failure (HF) discharge is associated with a higher risk of readmissions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: eighty-two patients included after HF discharge. The aim of the study was to characterize semiquantitatively the degree of pulmonary congestion and its changes, describing the relationship between these findings and diuretic management. RESULTS: On the first visit, despite the absence of clinical congestion in the majority of patients, half of the had some degree of pulmonary congestion by ultrasound. After global assessment in this initial visit (clinical and ultrasound) the diuretic was lowered in 50 patients (60%), kept the same in 16 (20%) and it was increased in the rest. In the 45 patients without ultrasound congestion, diuretic reduction was attempted in 80%, being this strategy successful in the majority of them. CONCLUSIONS: Lung ultrasound, using simple quantification methods, allows its real incorporation into clinical practice, helping us in the decision making process.

Comparative Effect of Loop Diuretic Prescription on Mortality and Heart Failure Readmission.

Loop diuretics are a standard pharmacologic therapy in heart failure (HF) management. Although furosemide is most frequently used, torsemide and bumetanide are increasingly prescribed in clinical practice, possibly because of superior bioavailability. Few real-world comparative effectiveness studies have examined outcomes across all 3 loop diuretics. The study goal was to compare the effects of loop diuretic prescribing at HF hospitalization discharge on mortality and HF readmission. We identified patients in Medicare claims data initiating furosemide, torsemide, or bumetanide after an index HF hospitalization from 2007 to 2017. We estimated 6-month risks of all-cause mortality and a composite outcome (HF readmission or all-cause mortality) using inverse probability of treatment weighting to adjust for relevant confounders. We identified 62,632 furosemide, 1,720 torsemide, and 2,389 bumetanide initiators. The 6-month adjusted all-cause mortality risk was lowest for torsemide (13.2%), followed by furosemide (14.5%) and bumetanide (15.6%). The 6-month composite outcome risk was 21.4% for torsemide, 24.7% for furosemide, and 24.9% for bumetanide. Compared with furosemide, the 6-month all-cause mortality risk was 1.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: -3.7, 1.0) lower for torsemide and 1.0% (95% CI: -1.2, 3.2) higher for bumetanide, and the 6-month composite outcome risk was 3.3% (95% CI: -6.3, -0.3) lower for torsemide and 0.2% (95% CI: -2.5, 2.9) higher for bumetanide. In conclusion, the findings suggested that the first prescribed loop diuretic following HF hospitalization is associated with clinically important differences in morbidity in older patients receiving torsemide, bumetanide, or furosemide. These differences were consistent for the effect of all-cause mortality alone, but were not statistically significant.

The kinocardiograph for assessment of fluid status in patients with acute decompensated heart failure.

AIMS: To improve telemonitoring strategies in heart failure patients, there is a need for novel non-obtrusive sensors that monitor parameters closely related to intracardiac filling pressures. This proof-of-concept study aims to evaluate the responsiveness of cardiac kinetic energy (KE) measured with the Kinocardiograph (KCG), consisting of a seismocardiographic (SCG) sensor and a ballistocardiographic (BCG) sensor, during treatment of patients with acute decompensated heart failure. METHODS AND RESULTS: Eleven patients with acute decompensated heart failure who were hospitalized for treatment with intravenous diuretics received daily KCG measurements. The KCG measurements were compared with the diameter of the inferior vena cava (IVC) and body weight. Follow-up stopped at discharge, that is, in the recompensated state. Median (interquartile range) weight and IVC diameter decreased significantly after diuretic treatment [weight 74.5 (67.6-98.7) to 73.3 (66.7-95.6) kg, P = 0.003; IVC diameter 2.47 (2.33-2.99) to 1.78 (1.65-2.47) cm, P = 0.03]. In contrast with BCG measurements, significant changes in median KE measured with SCG were observed during the passive filling phase of the diastole [SGG: 0.48 (0.39-0.60) to 0.69 (0.56-0.84), P = 0.026; BCG: 0.68 (0.46-0.73) to 0.68 (0.59-0.82), P = 0.062], the active filling phase of the diastole [SCG: 0.38 (0.30-0.61) to 0.31 (0.09-0.47), P = 0.016; BCG: 0.29 (0.17-0.39) to 0.26 (0.20-0.34), P = 0.248], and the ratio between the passive and active filling phases [SCG: 2.76 (1.68-5.30) to 5.02 (3.13-10.17), P = 0.006; BCG: 5.87 (3.57-7.55) to 5.27 (3.95-9.43), P = 0.790]. The correlations between changes in KE during the passive and active filling phases, using SCG, and changes in weight or IVC were non-significant. Systolic KE did not show significant changes. CONCLUSION: KE measured with the KCG using SCG is highly responsive to changes in fluid status. Future research is needed to confirm its accuracy in a larger study population and specifically its application for detection of clinical deterioration in the home-environment.

Great Sustainability Results From Appropriate Antihypertensive Therapy.

Cardiovascular diseases are emerging as a major cause of death and hospitalization in the Western world. For many years, a number of medicines have been placed on the market, in well-established and safe use for antihypertensive therapy. The various classes of antihypertensives in established use include, ACE inhibitors, as monotherapy or in combination with diuretics or calcium antagonists, sartans, calcium antagonists, beta blockers, and diuretics. Among these medicines classes there are differences in mechanism of action, efficacy in reducing blood pression, tolerability, and cost. In fact, there are wide differences in the monthly cost of therapy within each class and among the classes themselves. In this analysis we describe an example about the prescribing trends of antihypertensive drugs at a European sample represented by an Italian health care company of about 1 million inhabitants. Aspects of pharmacoeconomics, pharmacoutilization, and pharmacological differences are described.

Worsening of chronic heart failure: definition, epidemiology, management and prevention. A clinical consensus statement by the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology.

Episodes of worsening symptoms and signs characterize the clinical course of patients with chronic heart failure (HF). These events are associated with poorer quality of life, increased risks of hospitalization and death and are a major burden on healthcare resources. They usually require diuretic therapy, either administered intravenously or by escalation of oral doses or with combinations of different diuretic classes. Additional treatments may also have a major role, including initiation of guideline-recommended medical therapy (GRMT). Hospital admission is often necessary but treatment in the emergency service or in outpatient clinics or by primary care physicians has become increasingly used. Prevention of first and recurring episodes of worsening HF is an essential component of HF treatment and this may be achieved through early and rapid administration of GRMT. The aim of the present clinical consensus statement by the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology is to provide an update on the definition, clinical characteristics, management and prevention of worsening HF in clinical practice.

Lung ultrasound assessment of pulmonary edema in neonates with chronic lung disease before and after diuretic therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) is characterized by lung injury with varying degrees of disrupted alveolarization, vascular remodeling, inflammatory cell proliferation, and pulmonary edema. Diuretics are often used to ameliorate the symptoms or progression of BPD. Our primary objective was to use lung ultrasound (LUS) to determine if diuretics decrease pulmonary edema in infants with BPD. The secondary objective was to assess changes in respiratory support during the first week after initiation of diuretics. METHODS: Premature infants requiring noninvasive respiratory support and starting diuretic therapy for evolving BPD were compared with a similar group of infants not receiving diuretics (control). For the diuretic group, LUS exams were performed before and on Days 1, 3, and 6 after initiation of treatment. For the control group, LUS was performed at equivalent time points. A composite pulmonary edema severity (PES) score of 0-5 was calculated based on the total number of B-lines in six scanned areas. Respiratory support parameters (FiO2 , nasal cannula flow, or CPAP) were also recorded. RESULTS: Infants in the diuretic (n = 28) and control (n = 23) groups were recruited at median corrected gestational ages of 34.2 (33.3-35.9) and 34.0 (33.4-36.3) weeks, respectively (p = 0.82). PES scores, FiO2 , and respiratory flow support decreased significantly from Days 0 to 6 (p < 0.0001, p = 0.001, and p = 0.01, respectively) in the diuretic group, but not in the control group. CONCLUSION: Diuretic use is associated with decreased pulmonary edema and improved oxygenation in infants with BPD during the first week of treatment.

Effectiveness and cost-efficacy of diuretics home administration via peripherally inserted central venous catheter in patients with end-stage heart failure.

BACKGROUND: End-stage heart failure (ESHF) is characterized by severe cardiac dysfunction with persistent disabling symptoms and recurrent acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF), despite guideline-directed medical therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenous diuretics administration at home through a peripherally inserted central venous catheter (PICC) in ESHF patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty-one ESHF patients received PICC implantation for intravenous diuretic administration at home. The primary efficacy endpoint was the patient-level number of HF hospitalizations in the short (1-3 months), medium (six months), and long term (1 year), before and after PICC implantation. Pre- and post-PICC ADHF-free days were also evaluated as co-primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints comprised changes in clinical, laboratory and echocardiographic parameters, and device safety. A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed to estimate the economic impact of using PICC. For each time frame analyzed, a significant reduction in the number of hospitalizations due to ADHF was observed, resulting in a significant increase in ADHF-free days (71 ± 44 vs. 163 ± 136, p = 0.003). In matched patients' analysis, significant decrease in body weight (68 ± 16 kg vs. 63 ± 10 kg, p = 0.041) and mitral regurgitation grade 3/4 (55% vs. 18%, p < 0.001) were also observed. Freedom from PICC-related complications was observed in 61% of patients. A significant reduction in overall ADHF-hospitalizations cost was observed. CONCLUSIONS: This proof-of-concept study demonstrates the effectiveness and safety of home administration of intravenous diuretic therapy via PICC in ESHF patients. This palliative cost-effective strategy can be taken in consideration for selected end-stage patients no longer responsive to conventional therapies.

Dapagliflozina para o tratamento adicional de pacientes adultos com insuficiência cardíaca com fração de ejeção reduzida (FEVE≤40%), NYHA II-IV e sintomáticos apesar do uso de terapia padrão com inibidor da Enzima Conversora de Angiotensina (IECA) ou Antagonista do Receptor da angiotensina II (ARA II), com betabloqueadores, diuréticos e antagonista do receptor de mineralocorticoides / Dapagliflozin for the additional treatment of adult heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction (LVEF≤40%), NYHA II-IV and symptomatic despite the use of standard Angiotensin Converting Enzyme inhibitor therapy (ACEI) or Angiotensin II Receptor Antagonist (ARA II), with beta-blockers, diuretics and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists

INTRODUÇÃO: A IC é uma síndrome clínica complexa, na qual o coração é incapaz de bombear sangue de forma a atender às necessidades metabólicas tissulares representando um desafio pelo caráter progressivo da doença, a limitação da qualidade de vida e a alta mortalidade. É a principal causa de re-hospitalização no Brasil, com elevada mortalidade em cinco anos e se constatando que uma em cada cinco pessoas tem chance de desenvolvê-la ao longo da vida. A dapagliflozina age por inibição do cotransportador sódio-glicose 2 (SGLT2) melhorando o controle glicêmico em pacientes com diabetes mellitus e promovendo benefícios cardiovasculares. A inibição do SGLT2 promove redução da absorção de glicose do filtrado glomerular no túbulo renal proximal, com diminuição da reabsorção de sódio, levando à excreção urinária da glicose e diurese osmótica. Desta forma, aumenta a entrega de sódio ao túbulo distal, o qual aumenta a retroalimentação no túbulo glomerular e reduz a pressão intraglomerular. Este efeito combinado com a diurese osmóticaleva a uma redução na sobrecarga de volume, redução na pressão

Assessment of frailty and related outcomes in older patients with heart failure: A cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: Heart failure (HF) is a common cause of morbidity and mortality in older patients. Frailty is prevalent and complicates the course of HF. We sought to investigate the impact of frailty on HF outcomes. METHODS: Patients over 65 years old hospitalized with acute decompensated HF and mildly reduced or preserved EF, between September 2017 and September 2019 were enrolled in the study. Before hospital discharge at euvolemic state, patients underwent six-minute walk test (6MWT) and frailty assessment using FRIED and modified SOF scores. Predictors of death, readmissions, and increase in diuretic dose were analyzed by multivariable logistic regression models. RESULTS: We enrolled 193 consecutive patients (mean age 78.6 ± 8.4 years, 29.5% males, 59.6% with HF and preserved EF). All patients had at least one comorbidity (40.9% coronary artery disease, 71% diabetes, and 86% hypertension). The mean 6MWT distance was 316.2 meters. According to FRIED score, 4.7% were normal and 17.6% were categorized as pre-frail and 77.7% as frail, while according to SOF index 9.8% were normal, 15% were categorized as pre-frail and 75.1% as frail. Frail patients according to both indices had a higher risk of 90-day readmissions, uptitration of diuretics within 90 days (p < 0.001 for both) and numerically but not significantly higher risk of death. Frailty status was independently associated with higher risk of 90-day readmissions, uptitration of diuretics, and higher BNP at 90 days. CONCLUSIONS: Frailty in older patients with HF is common and associated with worse prognosis. Pre-discharge frailty assessment may aid in identification of patients at high-risk for short-term complications.

Incidence of, Risk Factors for, and Outcomes After Ascites in a Population-Based Cohort of Older Americans.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of, risk factors for, and outcomes after the development of ascites are poorly described for contemporary patients with cirrhosis. METHODS: We examined data for a 20% random sample of US Medicare enrollees with cirrhosis and Part D prescription coverage from 2008 to 2019, excluding patients with heart failure and diuretic use prior to cirrhosis. Among 63,364 persons with cirrhosis, we evaluated the incidence of ascites using an Aalen-Johansen estimator. We evaluated risk factors for ascites, mortality, and mortality after ascites using multistate modeling. We determined the associations with each outcome for an array of medication exposures including nonselective beta-blockers, antiviral therapy, statins, rifaximin, anticoagulants, and metformin. RESULTS: The cumulative incidence of ascites was 5.1%, 9.5%, and 10.7% and 1, 3, and 5 years overall. The corresponding data for ascites requiring paracentesis were 1%, 2.1%, and 2.4%. Persons aged < 65 years, with alcohol-related cirrhosis, varices, or HE, are most likely to develop ascites. The risk of ascites was higher for persons taking any NSBB (including carvedilol) but lower for those taking atorvastatin (but not other statins) and antiviral therapy for Hepatitis C. Incident ascites was associated with increased risk of death, HR 27.6 95%CI(21.7-35.1). Survival following ascites was 1.08 years (interquartile range, IQR, 0.26-2.75), 0.38 years (IQR0.1-1.3) for those requiring paracentesis. Lipophilic statins were the only medications associated with lower mortality after ascites requiring paracentesis. CONCLUSIONS: Ascites is associated with a high risk of death. Very few candidate therapies are associated with the reduction in the risk of ascites and mortality after ascites development.

Diuretic Changes, Health Care Resource Utilization, and Clinical Outcomes for Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: From the Change the Management of Patients With Heart Failure Registry.

BACKGROUND: Diuretics are a mainstay therapy for the symptomatic treatment of heart failure. However, in contemporary US outpatient practice, the degree to which diuretic dosing changes over time and the associations with clinical outcomes and health care resource utilization are unknown. METHODS: Among 3426 US outpatients with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction in the Change the Management of Patients with Heart Failure registry with complete medication data and who were prescribed a loop diuretic, diuretic dose increase was defined as: (1) change to a total daily dose higher than their previous total daily dose, (2) addition of metolazone to the regimen, (3) change from furosemide to either bumetanide or torsemide, and the change persists for at least 7 days. Adjusted hazard ratios or rate ratios along with 95% CIs were reported for clinical outcomes among patients with an increase in oral diuretic dose versus no increase in diuretic dose. RESULTS: Overall, 796 (23%) had a diuretic dose increase (18 episodes per 100 patient-years). The proportion of patients with dyspnea at rest (38% versus 26%), dyspnea at exertion (79% versus 67%), orthopnea (32% versus 21%), edema (60% versus 43%), and weight gain (40% versus 23%) were significantly (all P <0.001) higher in the diuretic increase group. Baseline angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker (hazard ratio, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.65-0.87]) use were associated with lower likelihood of diuretic increase over time. Patients with a diuretic dose increase had a significantly higher number of heart failure hospitalizations (rate ratio, 2.53 [95% CI, 2.10-3.05]), emergency department visits (rate ratio, 1.84 [95% CI, 1.56-2.17]), and home health visits (rate ratio, 1.88 [95% CI, 1.39-2.54]), but not all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 1.10 [95% CI, 0.89-1.36]). Similarly, greater furosemide dose equivalent increases were associated with greater resource utilization but not with mortality, compared with smaller increases. CONCLUSIONS: In this contemporary US registry, 1 in 4 patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction had outpatient escalation of diuretic therapy over longitudinal follow-up, and these patients were more likely to have sign/symptoms of congestion. Outpatient diuretic dose escalation of any magnitude was associated with heart failure hospitalizations and resource utilization, but not all-cause mortality.

The value of urinary sodium assessment in acute heart failure.

Acute heart failure (AHF) is a frequent medical condition that needs immediate evaluation and appropriate treatment. Patients with signs and symptoms of volume overload mostly require intravenous loop diuretics in the first hours of hospitalization. Some patients may develop diuretic resistance, resulting in insufficient and delayed decongestion, with increased mortality and morbidity. Urinary sodium measurement at baseline and/or during treatment has been proposed as a useful parameter to tailor diuretic therapy in these patients. This systematic review discusses the current sum of evidence regarding urinary sodium assessment to evaluate diuretic efficacy in AHF. We searched Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Clinical Trials Register for published studies that tested urinary sodium assessment in patients with AHF.

Management of heart failure in cardiac amyloidosis using an ambulatory diuresis clinic.

BACKGROUND: Recurrent congestion in cardiac amyloidosis (CA) remains a management challenge, often requiring high dose diuretics and frequent hospitalizations. Innovative outpatient strategies are needed to effectively manage heart failure (HF) in patients with CA. Ambulatory diuresis has not been well studied in restrictive cardiomyopathy. Therefore, we aimed to examine the outcomes of an ambulatory diuresis clinic in the management of congestion related to CA. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively studied patients with CA seen in an outpatient HF disease management clinic for (1) safety outcomes of ambulatory intravenous (IV) diuresis and (2) health care utilization. Forty-four patients with CA were seen in the clinic a total of 203 times over 6 months. Oral diuretics were titrated at 96 (47%) visits. IV diuretics were administered at 56 (28%) visits to 17 patients. There were no episodes of severe acute kidney injury or symptomatic hypotension. There was a significant decrease in emergency department and inpatient visits and associated charges after index visit to the clinic. The proportion of days hospitalized per 1000 patient days of follow-up decreased as early as 30 days (147.3 vs 18.1/1000 patient days of follow-up, P< .001) and persisted through 180 days (33.6 vs 22.9/1000 patient days of follow-up, P< .001) pre- vs post-index visit to the clinic. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate the feasibility of ambulatory IV diuresis in patients with CA. Our findings also suggest that use of a HF disease management clinic may reduce acute care utilization in patients with CA. Leveraging multidisciplinary outpatient HF clinics may be an effective alternative to hospitalization in patients with HF due to CA, a population who otherwise carries a poor prognosis and contributes to high health care burden.

Sex differences in cardiac magnetic resonance features in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Whether sex differences exist in cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) findings in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) remain unknown. We sought to assess and compare CMR characteristics in male and female patients with HCM. From January-2006 to October-2017, 165 consecutive HCM patients evaluated with CMR were included. All clinical and complementary test information was prospectively collected. At the time of CMR evaluation women were older (70 [57-75] vs. 61 [47-72] years, p = 0.02) and more symptomatic in terms of dyspnea (New York Heart Association class II-IV 47.2 vs. 24.1%, p = 0.003) and palpitations (19.6 vs. 4.6%, p = 0.006) and received more frequently treatment with diuretics (49.1% vs. 23.4%, p = 0.001). On echocardiographic examination more women had obstructive physiology (45.1 vs. 20.6%, p = 0.002). On CMR evaluation, women showed smaller left ventricular end-systolic volume index (13 [10-15] vs. 16 [13-21] ml/m2, p < 0.001), higher left ventricular ejection fraction (77 [74-80] vs. 72 [66-78]%, p = 0.004), more marked left ventricular outflow tract acceleration (54.7 vs. 26.4%, p < 0.001) and mitral regurgitation (33.3 vs. 12.7%, p = 0.002). In multivariable analysis, female sex [OR 2.44 (1.04-5.73), p = 0.04] and left ventricular end-systolic volume index [OR 1.60 (1.08-2.38), p = 0.018] were independently associated with obstructive physiology. Women with HCM have more frequently obstructive physiology, a finding that could be related to the smaller left ventricular end-systolic volume.

Hypotheses, rationale, design, and methods for prognostic evaluation of a randomized comparison between patients with coronary artery disease associated with ischemic cardiomyopathy who undergo medical or surgical treatment: MASS-VI (HF).

BACKGROUND: Ischemic cardiomyopathy and severe left ventricular dysfunction are well established to represent the main determinants of poor survival and premature death compared with preserved ventricular function. However, the role of myocardial revascularization as a therapeutic alternative is not known to improve the long-term prognosis in this group of patients. This study will investigate whether myocardial revascularization contributes to a better prognosis for patients compared with those treated with drugs alone and followed over the long term. METHODS: The study will include 600 patients with coronary artery disease associated with ischemic cardiomyopathy. The surgical or drug therapy option will be randomized, and the events considered for analysis will be all-cause mortality, nonfatal infarction, unstable angina requiring additional revascularization, and stroke. The events will be analyzed according to the intent-to-treat principle. Patients with multivessel coronary disease and left ventricular ejection fraction measurements of less than 35% will be included. In addition, myocardial ischemia will be documented by myocardial scintigraphy. Markers of myocardial necrosis will be checked at admission and after the procedure. DISCUSSION: The role of myocardial revascularization (CABG) in the treatment of patients with coronary artery disease and heart failure is not clearly established. The surgical option of revascularizing the myocardium is a procedure designed to reduce the load of myocardial hibernation in patients with heart failure caused by coronary artery disease. On the other hand, the assessment of myocardial viability is frequently used to identify patients with left ventricular ischemic dysfunction in which CABG may add survival benefit. However, the effectiveness of this option is uncertain. The great difficulty in establishing the efficacy of surgical intervention is based on the understanding of viability without ischemia. Thus, this study will include only patients with viable and truly ischemic myocardium to correct this anomaly. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Evaluation of a randomized comparison between patients with coronary artery disease associated with ischemic cardiomyopathy submitted to medical or surgical treatment: MASS-VI (HF), ISRCTN77449548, Oct 10th, 2019 (retrospectively registered).

Burden and challenges of heart failure in patients with chronic kidney disease. A call to action.

Patients with the dual burden of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and chronic congestive heart failure (HF) experience unacceptably high rates of symptom load, hospitalization, and mortality. Currently, concerted efforts to identify, prevent and treat HF in CKD patients are lacking at the institutional level, with emphasis still being placed on individual specialty views on this topic. The authors of this review paper endorse the need for a dedicated cardiorenal interdisciplinary team that includes nephrologists and renal nurses and jointly manages appropriate clinical interventions across the inpatient and outpatient settings. There is a critical need for guidelines and best clinical practice models from major cardiology and nephrology professional societies, as well as for research funding in both specialties to focus on the needs of future therapies for HF in CKD patients. The implementation of cross-specialty educational programs across all levels in cardiology and nephrology will help train future specialists and nurses who have the ability to diagnose, treat, and prevent HF in CKD patients in a precise, clinically effective, and cost-favorable manner.