Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Liver Transplantation and Alcohol-Associated Liver Disease in the USA.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The surge in unhealthy alcohol use during the COVID-19 pandemic may have detrimental effects on the rising burden of alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD) on liver transplantation (LT) in the USA. We evaluated the effect of the pandemic on temporal trends for LT including ALD. APPROACH AND RESULTS: Using data from United Network for Organ Sharing, we analyzed wait-list outcomes in the USA through March 1, 2021. In a short-period analysis, patients listed or transplanted between June 1, 2019, and February 29, 2020, were defined as the "pre-COVID" era, and after April 1, 2020, were defined as the "COVID" era. Interrupted time-series analyses using monthly count data from 2016-2020 were constructed to evaluate the rate change for listing and LT before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Rates for listings (P = 0.19) and LT (P = 0.14) were unchanged during the pandemic despite a significant reduction in the monthly listing rates for HCV (-21.69%, P < 0.001) and NASH (-13.18%; P < 0.001). There was a significant increase in ALD listing (+7.26%; P < 0.001) and LT (10.67%; P < 0.001) during the pandemic. In the COVID era, ALD (40.1%) accounted for more listings than those due to HCV (12.4%) and NASH (23.4%) combined. The greatest increase in ALD occurred in young adults (+33%) and patients with severe alcohol-associated hepatitis (+50%). Patients with ALD presented with a higher acuity of illness, with 30.8% of listings and 44.8% of LT having a Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-Sodium score ≥30. CONCLUSIONS: Since the start of COVID-19 pandemic, ALD has become the most common indication for listing and the fastest increasing cause for LT. Collective efforts are urgently needed to stem the rising tide of ALD on health care resources.

Cross-sectional assessment of haemostatic profile and hepatic dysfunction in Fontan patients.

BACKGROUND: Fontan-associated liver disease is accompanied by a hypercoagulable state. While hepatic dysfunction in Fontan patients is common, its relationship with haemostatic changes and clinical outcomes in this patient population remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To correlate liver dysfunction and haemostatic profiles with clinical outcomes in the Fontan population. PATIENTS/METHODS: Patients were enrolled in a multicentre, cross-sectional study in Australia and New Zealand. Hepatic structure and function were assessed using serum-based calculations (Fibrotest and model for end-stage liver disease excluding international normalised ratio scores). Haemostatic profiles were assessed by Thrombin Generation. Platelet function was assessed via Platelet Factor 4 (PF4) and P-selectin (P-SEL). Clinical outcomes were obtained from the Australian and New Zealand Fontan Registry. RESULTS: Seventy-three patients participated in the study (mean age 18.9±8.5 years with a mean of 13.5±6.9 years post-Fontan). The Endogenous Thrombin Potential (ETP) for patients who suffered thrombotic events (TE) (1366.4±66.2 nM/min) was higher compared with patients with major bleeding events (1011.1±138.4 nM/min) (p=0.03). Except for a negative correlation between Fibrotest-score and PF4 (p=0.045), PF4 and P-SEL concentrations did not correlate with markers of hepatic dysfunction or structural abnormality. CONCLUSIONS: Increased ETP is associated with TE during clinical follow-up after Fontan. This study reinforces that hepatic dysfunction may contribute to the derangement of coagulation factors, impacting the individual risk of haemostatic complications for the Fontan population.

Hernia Management in Cirrhosis: Risk Assessment, Operative Approach, and Perioperative Care.

BACKGROUND: The rising incidence of liver disease has complicated the management of common surgical pathologies. Hernias, in particular, are problematic given the shortage of high-quality data and differing expert opinions. We aim to provide a narrative review of hernia management in cirrhosis as a first step toward developing evidence-based recommendations for the care of these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature review using separate search strings was conducted for PubMed and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases. Review articles, conference abstracts, randomized clinical trials, and observational studies were included. Articles without a focus on patients with end-stage liver disease were excluded. Manuscripts were selected based on relevance to perioperative risk assessment, medical optimization, surgical decision-making, and considerations of hernia repair in patients with cirrhosis. RESULTS: The existing literature is varied with regard to focus and quality of data. Of the 4516 articles identified, 51 full-text articles were selected for review. In general, there is evidence to suggest that individuals with compensated cirrhosis may successfully undergo and benefit from hernia repair. Patients at high risk for decompensated cirrhosis may be best served by nonoperative management. CONCLUSIONS: Carefully selected patients with cirrhosis may proceed with herniorrhaphy. A multidisciplinary approach is essential to provide high-quality care and improve outcomes.

Cost effectiveness of using ursodeoxycholic acid to treat primary biliary cholangitis.

Primary biliary cholangitis is a chronic inflammatory, autoimmune cholestatic liver disease, which untreated will usually progress to end-stage biliary cirrhosis. The aims of treatment and management of primary biliary cholangitis are the amelioration of associated symptoms, particularly pruritis and fatigue, and the prevention of end-stage liver disease. The presentation, natural history and clinical course are variable. Recent published European and UK clinical guidelines have emphasized the need for risk stratification and an individualized approach to patient management in primary biliary cholangitis. The bile acid, ursodeoxycholic acid, is established as the first-line treatment of primary biliary cholangitis. Assessment of clinical response to treatment is based on specified improvements in serum liver tests including near normalization of the serum alkaline phosphatase level at 1 year. At least two thirds of patients with primary biliary cholangitis should respond to ursodeoxycholic acid after 1 year's treatment. The correct dosage of ursodeoxycholic acid is determined by body weight viz 13-15 mg/kg/day. A significant number of patients with primary biliary cholangitis in the UK are being underdosed. Over a third of ursodeoxycholic acid partial responders become responders within 2 years after increasing the ursodeoxycholic acid doses to recommended levels. While transplant rates for primary biliary cholangitis have halved over the last 20 years, it is clear that optimizing the dose of ursodeoxycholic acid in partial responders would further decrease morbidity, mortality and the need for liver transplantation.

Model for End-stage Liver Disease excluding INR (MELD-XI) score in critically ill patients: Easily available and of prognostic relevance.

PURPOSE: MELD-XI, an adapted version of Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score excluding INR, was reported to predict outcomes e.g. in patients with acute heart failure. We aimed to evaluate MELD-XI in critically ill patients admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) for prognostic relevance. METHODS: A total of 4381 medical patients (66±14 years, 2862 male) admitted to a German ICU between 2004 and 2009 were included and retrospectively investigated. Admission diagnoses were e.g. myocardial infarction (n = 2034), sepsis (n = 694) and heart failure (n = 688). We divided our patients in two cohorts basing on their MELD-XI score and evaluated the MELD-XI score for its prognostic relevance regarding short-term and long-term survival. Optimal cut-offs were calculated by means of the Youden-Index. RESULTS: Patients with a MELD-XI score >12 had pronounced laboratory signs of organ failure and more comorbidities. MELD-XI >12 was associated with an increase in short-term (27% vs 6%; HR 4.82, 95%CI 3.93-5.93; p<0.001) and long-term (HR 3.69, 95%CI 3.20-4.25; p<0.001) mortality. In a univariate Cox regression analysis for all patients MELD-XI was associated with increased long-term mortality (changes per score point: HR 1.06, 95%CI 1.05-1.07; p<0.001) and remained to be associated with increased mortality after correction in a multivariate regression analysis for renal failure, liver failure, lactate concentration, blood glucose concentration, oxygenation and white blood count (HR 1.04, 95%CI 1.03-1.06; p<0.001). Optimal cut-off for the overall cohort was 11 and varied remarkably depending on the admission diagnosis: myocardial infarction (9), pulmonary embolism (9), cardiopulmonary resuscitation (17) and pneumonia (17). We performed ROC-analysis and compared the AUC: SAPS2 (0.78, 95%CI 0.76-0.80; p<0.0001) and APACHE (0.76, 95%CI 0.74-0.78; p<0.003) score were superior to MELD-XI (0.71, 95%CI 0.68-0.73) for prediction of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The easily calculable MELD-XI score is a robust and reliable tool to predict both intra-ICU and long-term mortality in critically ill medical patients admitted to an ICU. Optimal cut-off values for MELD-XI scores seem to depend on the primary disease and need to be validated in future prospective studies. Compared to SAPS2 and APACHE score, MELD-XI lacks precision but might have comparable and even additive value, as it is easily available and independent of subjective values.

Characterizing the Risk of False-Positive Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Recipients Transplanted With T2 MELD Exceptions.

BACKGROUND: Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can receive Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) exception points to increase waitlist priority for liver transplantation. This process does not require a biopsy and is based on radiologic criteria. However, imaging modalities are imperfect, and some will ultimately have no HCC on explant. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study using national explant pathology data from 2012 to 2015. False-positive HCC was defined as answering "no" to the question: "was evidence of HCC (viable or nonviable) found in the explant?" in patients with T2 MELD exceptions. RESULTS: Four thousand one hundred seventeen patients received T2 MELD exceptions, of which 245 (6%) had false-positive HCC. Maximal tumor diameter of 3 to 5 cm and serum α fetoprotein (AFP) greater than 100 ng/mL at transplant yielded a 50% lower risk of false-positive HCC (odds ratio [OR], 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.27-0.73 and OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.37-0.88, respectively). Recipients with immune-mediated liver disease were twice as likely to have no HCC on explant (OR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.18-3.83) and had a predicted probability of false positive HCC greater than 10% regardless of largest tumor size or AFP. Significant among-center variability in the rate of false-positive HCC was seen. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of false-positive HCC is markedly higher in certain groups, such that biopsy may be warranted before T2 MELD exception point approval. Transplant centers with high false-positive HCC rates may benefit from greater oversight.

Clinical epidemiology and disease burden of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is defined as the presence of hepatic fat accumulation after the exclusion of other causes of hepatic steatosis, including other causes of liver disease, excessive alcohol consumption, and other conditions that may lead to hepatic steatosis. NAFLD encompasses a broad clinical spectrum ranging from nonalcoholic fatty liver to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), advanced fibrosis, cirrhosis, and finally hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). NAFLD is the most common liver disease in the world and NASH may soon become the most common indication for liver transplantation. Ongoing persistence of obesity with increasing rate of diabetes will increase the prevalence of NAFLD, and as this population ages, many will develop cirrhosis and end-stage liver disease. There has been a general increase in the prevalence of NAFLD, with Asia leading the rise, yet the United States is following closely behind with a rising prevalence from 15% in 2005 to 25% within 5 years. NAFLD is commonly associated with metabolic comorbidities, including obesity, type II diabetes, dyslipidemia, and metabolic syndrome. Our understanding of the pathophysiology of NAFLD is constantly evolving. Based on NAFLD subtypes, it has the potential to progress into advanced fibrosis, end-stage liver disease and HCC. The increasing prevalence of NAFLD with advanced fibrosis, is concerning because patients appear to experience higher liver-related and non-liver-related mortality than the general population. The increased morbidity and mortality, healthcare costs and declining health related quality of life associated with NAFLD makes it a formidable disease, and one that requires more in-depth analysis.

Value of Sustained Virologic Response in Patients with Hepatitis C as a Function of Time to Progression of End-Stage Liver Disease.

BACKGROUND: Targeted intervention in patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) closest to end-stage liver disease (ESLD) progression may offer an approach to treatment prioritisation whilst delivering benefits for patients and the healthcare system. In contrast to previous HCV economic analyses, this study aimed to estimate the health economic value of sustained virologic response (SVR) stratified by the patient's propensity to progress to ESLD. METHODS: An HCV natural history model was adapted to estimate the value of avoiding ESLD complications following SVR, assessed as cost offsets and quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gains, as a function of time to ESLD at treatment initiation. These outcomes were used to estimate the financial value of achieving SVR, defined as the maximum investment that could be allocated without exceeding a willingness-to-pay threshold of £20,000/QALY. RESULTS: Regardless of time to ESLD onset, achieving SVR was beneficial, resulting in cost offsets and QALY gains, due to avoidance of ESLD complications. The value of achieving SVR was greatest in patients closest to ESLD onset, resulting in increased cost offsets and QALY gains (up to £50,901 and 9.56 QALYs). In patients closest to ESLD onset, the financial value of achieving SVR was £242,051, compared with £127,116 in patients furthest from onset. CONCLUSIONS: Standard cost-effectiveness evaluations may underestimate the value of treatment in HCV patients closest to ESLD development. Targeted intervention would promote efficient allocation of limited healthcare resources and reconcile concerns surrounding the affordability of new direct-acting antivirals, by minimising the number-needed-to-treat to maximise health benefit, whilst minimising healthcare expenditure.

Biliary atresia: Indications and timing of liver transplantation and optimization of pretransplant care.

Biliary atresia (BA) is a progressive, fibro-obliterative disorder of the intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile ducts in infancy. The majority of affected children will eventually develop end-stage liver disease and require liver transplantation (LT). Indications for LT in BA include failed Kasai portoenterostomy, significant and recalcitrant malnutrition, recurrent cholangitis, and the progressive manifestations of portal hypertension. Extrahepatic complications of this disease, such as hepatopulmonary syndrome and portopulmonary hypertension, are also indications for LT. Optimal pretransplant management of these potentially life-threatening complications and maximizing nutrition and growth require the expertise of a multidisciplinary team with experience caring for BA. The timing of transplant for BA requires careful consideration of the potential risk of transplant versus the survival benefit at any given stage of disease. Children with BA often experience long wait times for transplant unless exception points are granted to reflect severity of disease. Family preparedness for this arduous process is therefore critical. Liver Transplantation 23:96-109 2017 AASLD.

Primary Biliary Cholangitis: Medical and Specialty Pharmacy Management Update.

BACKGROUND: Chronic liver disease and cirrhosis are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States. Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), previously known as primary biliary cirrhosis and which has been designated an orphan condition, is a chronic autoimmune disease resulting in the destruction of the small bile ducts in the liver. Without effective treatment, disease progression frequently leads to liver failure and death. Until May 2016, the only FDA-approved treatment for PBC was ursodiol (UDCA), an oral hydrophilic bile acid, which can slow progression of liver damage due to PBC. However, 1 out of 3 patients taking UDCA has an inadequate biochemical response, leading to increased risk of disease progression, liver transplantation, and mortality. Given this unmet clinical need, new therapies are in development for the treatment of PBC. To provide pharmacists with an overview of the latest research on the pathophysiology of PBC and potential new treatment options and to highlight medical and specialty pharmacy approaches to managing access to drugs to treat orphan diseases such as PBC, a 2-hour satellite symposium was presented in conjunction with the 2015 Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy (AMCP) Nexus meeting. Although obeticholic acid was approved by the FDA for the treatment of PBC in May 2016, this development occurred after the symposium presentation. The symposium was supported by an independent educational grant from Intercept Pharmaceuticals and was managed by Analysis Group. Robert Navarro, PharmD, moderated the CPE-accredited symposium titled "Medical and Specialty Pharmacy Management Update on Primary Biliary Cirrhosis." Expert panelists included Christopher L. Bowlus, MD; James T. Kenney, RPh, MBA; and Gary Rice, RPh, MS, MBA, CSP. OBJECTIVE: To summarize the educational satellite symposium presentations and discussions. SUMMARY: Autoimmune liver diseases, including PBC, are responsible for 15% of all liver transplants performed and an equal percentage of deaths related to liver disease. UDCA is the only FDA-approved therapy for treatment of PBC and is considered the standard of care. Nevertheless, many patients do not respond to UDCA, creating the need for new therapeutic options to improve clinical outcomes for PBC patients with inadequate response to treatment. While several agents are being studied in combination with UDCA, monotherapy with the novel agent obeticholic acid, a farnesoid X receptor agonist, has also shown promising results. Health plans are anticipated to assign any newly introduced therapy for the treatment of PBC to specialty pharmacy given its orphan disease status. This assignment enables the health plan to receive disease education, which is particularly important when new drugs are indicated for orphan diseases, and assistance with designing appropriate prior authorization criteria. The clinical value of any new therapeutic options that will inform formulary decisions and prior authorization criteria will be assessed based on evidence of efficacy, safety, and tolerability, among other factors, such as the potential to reduce or delay medical resource utilization (e.g., liver transplant). Key considerations for prior authorization of a new therapy will be determining which PBC patients are appropriate candidates for the new therapy and developing criteria for that determination. These are likely to include clinical diagnostic criteria and degree of response to prior treatment with UDCA. Initially, any new therapy would likely be positioned as noncovered until appropriate prior authorization criteria are established. CONCLUSIONS: PBC is a chronic liver disease with significant morbidity and mortality, as well as a significant burden on the health care system if the disease progresses to the point at which a liver transplant is needed. Although UDCA, the current standard of care, has improved outcomes for many patients, others have an inadequate response to this treatment. This symposium discussed these issues and also addressed the overall treatment paradigm for orphan drug therapies, key implications for patient management, and the role of specialty pharmacy management and any associated needs both in general and specifically for new therapeutic options for PBC.

National Assessment of Hospitalization Rates for Incident End-Stage Renal Disease After Liver Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: We examined the association of incident end-stage renal disease (ESRD) after liver transplantation (LT) and resource utilization using a data linkage between the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients and claims data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. METHODS: The study cohort consisted of patients aged ≥18 years who underwent deceased donor LT between January 1, 2003, and December 31, 2010, with Medicare as primary or secondary insurance and were discharged alive from the index LT hospitalization (n = 7019). The association of ESRD and post-LT hospitalization was assessed by sequential stratification, which entailed prognostic score matching of ESRD-free patients to each LT recipient at ESRD onset. The prognostic score was developed from a model of time to hospitalization and included baseline factors and hospitalization history as predictors. RESULTS: The overall hospitalization rates for LT recipients with and without ESRD were 2.7 and 1.1 per patient-year at risk, respectively. The total number of days hospitalized patient per year was 23 in ESRD and 7 in non-ESRD LT recipients. The adjusted post-LT hospitalization rate was 97% higher after reaching ESRD compared to non-ESRD (hazard ratio, 1.97; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Hospitalization rates increased significantly for LT recipients after ESRD onset. Early risk factor modification efforts targeting patients who are at high ESRD risk may reduce post-LT ESRD incidence and hence decrease morbidity and cost among LT recipients.

The wider public health value of HCV treatment accrued by liver transplant recipients.

OBJECTIVES: Organs for transplantation are scarce, but new medical therapies can prevent organ failure and the need for transplants. We sought to describe the unique value created by treatments that spare organs from failure and thus conserve donated organs for transplant into others, using hepatitis C virus (HCV) as a case study. STUDY DESIGN: Epidemiologic-economic model. METHODS: Using data on trends in chronic liver disease, liver disease progression, and liver transplant allocation models, as well as the effectiveness of new HCV treatments, we estimate the potential effects of systematic HCV screening and treatment on the demand for liver transplants in the United States. We estimate the spillover benefits to patients with all-cause liver disease in terms of increased availability of transplants and life-years gained. RESULTS: We estimated that systematic HCV screening and treatment could spare 10,490 liver transplants to HCV-infected patients from 2015 to 2035. An estimated 7321 transplants would accrue to patients with end-stage liver disease without HCV and 3169 transplants to those with uncured HCV, providing approximately 52,700 and 22,800 additional life-years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment advances for HCV have the potential to generate considerable spillover benefits to patients awaiting transplants for non-HCV-mediated liver failure. For other diseases in which organ transplants are in short supply, our study provides a novel pathway by which positive spillovers may accrue from treatments that prevent end-stage organ disease.

Liver transplantation in Germany.

Liver transplantation (LT) is a well-accepted procedure for end-stage liver disease in Germany. In 2015, 1489 patients were admitted to the waiting list (including 1308 new admissions), with the leading etiologies being fibrosis and cirrhosis (n = 349), alcoholic liver disease (n = 302), and hepatobiliary malignancies (n = 220). Organ allocation in Germany is regulated within the Eurotransplant system based on urgency as expressed by the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score. In 2015, only 894 LTs (n = 48 from living donors) were performed at 23 German transplant centers, reflecting a shortage of organs. Several factors may contribute to the low number of organ donations. The German transplant legislation only accepts donation after brain death (not cardiac death), whereas advances in neurosurgery and a more frequently requested "palliative care" approach render fewer patients suitable as potential donors. The legislation further requires the active consent of the donor or first-degree relatives before donation. Ongoing debates within the German transplant field address the optimal management of patients with alcoholic liver cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and cholangiocarcinoma and measures to increase living donor transplantations. As a result of irregularities at mainly 4 German transplant centers that were exposed in 2012, guiding principles updated by the German authorities have since implemented strict rules (including internal and external auditing, the 8-eyes principle, mandatory repeated testing for alcohol consumption) to prohibit any manipulations in organ allocation. In conclusion, we will summarize important aspects on the management of LT in Germany, discuss legal and organizational aspects, and highlight challenges mainly related to the relative lack of organ donations, increasing numbers of extended criteria donors, and the peculiarities of the recipient patients. Liver Transplantation 22 1136-1142 2016 AASLD.

Child-Pugh, MELD, and ALBI scores for predicting the in-hospital mortality in cirrhotic patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure.

OBJECTIVES: Our study aimed to evaluate the discriminative abilities of Child-Pugh, model for end-stage liver disease (MELD), and albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) scores in predicting the in-hospital mortality in cirrhotic patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF). METHODS: Cirrhotic patients with ACLF admitted between 2010 January and 2014 June were retrospectively reviewed. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. RESULTS: One hundred patients were eligible for the Asia-Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL) criteria. AUROCs of Child-Pugh, MELD, and ALBI scores in predicting the in-hospital mortality was 0.63 (95%CI: 0.52-0.72, P = 0.05), 0.75 (95%CI: 0.65-0.83, P < 0.0001), and 0.53 (95%CI: 0.42-0.63, P = 0.69), respectively. Eighty-eight patients were eligible for the EASL/AASLD criteria. AUROCs of Child-Pugh, MELD, and ALBI scores in predicting the in-hospital mortality were 0.59 (95%CI: 0.48-0.69, P = 0.14), 0.57 (95%CI: 0.46-0.68, P = 0.26), and 0.57 (95%CI: 0.46-0.67, P = 0.29), respectively. There was no significant difference among them. CONCLUSION: Child-Pugh, MELD, and ALBI scores might be ineffective in predicting the in-hospital mortality of cirrhosis with ACLF.

Predictors of mortality in cirrhotic patients undergoing extrahepatic surgery: comparison of Child-Turcotte-Pugh and model for end-stage liver disease-based indices.

BACKGROUND: Underlying liver cirrhosis is associated with high morbidity and mortality after surgery. Previous studies have reported conflicting results about the value of Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) and model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scores as predictors of post-operative mortality. This study was designed to compare the capacities of CTP, MELD and MELD-based indices in predicting mortality for patients with liver cirrhosis who underwent elective extrahepatic surgery. METHODS: The medical records of 79 patients with liver cirrhosis who underwent elective extrahepatic surgery under general anaesthesia from December 2000 to December 2009 were reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 21 months, and the mortality rate was 24.1% (n = 19). Among the 19 mortalities, nine (11.4%) occurred while the patient was hospitalized after surgery. Intraoperative transfusion amount (≥700 mL; odds ratio 6.294, P = 0.004) and the integrated MELD score (≥34; odds ratio 6.654, P = 0.007) were significantly correlated with post-operative mortality. CTP score (hazard ratio 1.575, P = 0.012) was significantly correlated with overall mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Integrated MELD may be a more accurate predictor of operative mortality in cirrhotic patients undergoing extrahepatic surgery than CTP and other MELD-Na based indices. However, overall mortality may be reflected more accurately by CTP score. Further large-scale study will be needed to validate this result.

Bermuda Triangle for the liver: alcohol, obesity, and viral hepatitis.

Despite major progress in understanding and managing liver disease in the past 30 years, it is now among the top 10 most common causes of death globally. Several risk factors, such as genetics, diabetes, obesity, excessive alcohol consumption, viral infection, gender, immune dysfunction, and medications, acting individually or in concert, are known to precipitate liver damage. Viral hepatitis, excessive alcohol consumption, and obesity are the major factors causing liver injury. Estimated numbers of hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected subjects worldwide are staggering (370 and 175 million, respectively), and of the 40 million known human immunodeficiency virus positive subjects, 4 and 5 million are coinfected with HBV and HCV, respectively. Alcohol and HCV are the leading causes of end-stage liver disease worldwide and the most common indication for liver transplantation in the United States and Europe. In addition, the global obesity epidemic that affects up to 40 million Americans, and 396 million worldwide, is accompanied by an alarming incidence of end-stage liver disease, a condition exacerbated by alcohol. This article focuses on the interactions between alcohol, viral hepatitis, and obesity (euphemistically described here as the Bermuda Triangle of liver disease), and discusses common mechanisms and synergy.

[Distribution of livers from deceased donors : current allocation rules and algorithms]. / Vermittlung postmortal gespendeter Lebern : Derzeitige Allokationsregeln und -algorithmen.

Eurotransplant is responsible for the allocation of organs from deceased donors in Germany. The guidelines governing this allocation process have been developed and are continuously updated by the German Medical Association and are based on urgency and outcome of the planned transplantation. The allocation sequence for donor livers is based on the model of end-stage liver disease (MELD) score, which is calculated using three laboratory values, bilirubin, creatinine and the international normalized ratio (INR) and allows an objective and transparent evaluation of the urgency of the transplantation. For patients with liver diseases where the MELD score does not allow an estimation of the urgency of the transplantation, special rules apply. The international cooperation among the Eurotransplant member countries especially increases the probability of finding a suitable donor organ in time for highly urgent patients and patients with special difficulties in matching characteristics.

[Patient selection and indications for liver transplantation]. / Indikationsstellung und Indikationen für eine Lebertransplantation.

Liver transplantation represents an established component of the therapeutic repertoire for irreversible chronic liver diseases. Liver transplantation is confronted by a shortage of donor allografts as well as by an increasing overall number of potentially useful indications, which leads to a rationing of this therapeutic option. Since December 2006 the priority for liver transplantation is determined by the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) and not by the length of waiting time. The evaluation of indications which are prioritized according to laboratory values (serum creatine, serum bilirubin and coagulation) and the so-called standard exception categories which have to fulfil specific criteria place increased demands on the interdisciplinary transplantation team, on the evaluation for liver transplantation and the prediction of the success of transplantation required by the Transplantation Act. The establishment and implementation of robust, objective and transparent systems to assess not only preoperative priorities but also postoperative benefits represents a major challenge for transplantation medicine.