Decompression Sickness Risk Assessment and Awareness in General Aviation.

INTRODUCTION: Decompression sickness (DCS) can occur during unpressurized flight to altitudes >18,000 ft (FL180; 5486 m). To our knowledge, this has not been studied in general aviation (GA). This knowledge gap may have public health and safety implications because the most popular models of GA aircraft by sales volume are capable of flying >FL180.METHODS: Data from a 1-yr period in a commercial flight tracking database were analyzed to identify flights >FL180 in unpressurized, piston aircraft in the United States. Peak altitude and duration at that altitude were used to calculate DCS risk employing the U.S. Air Force (USAF) Altitude Decompression Sickness Risk Assessment Computer (ADRAC). Registration numbers were cross referenced in publicly available federal databases to identify any events that might be attributable to impairment due to DCS. A web-based survey of practices and associated symptoms was also made available to GA pilots through an online discussion forum.RESULTS: During the data collection period, 1696 flights occurred. The DCS risk was calculated to be 1.9 4.2%. There were 42 responses to the survey. Of these, 25 (59.5%) pilots reported having flown at altitudes >FL180 and 21 (84%) of them reported symptoms possibly attributable to DCS. None sought medical attention. No safety events were identified for any of the aircraft during the study period.CONCLUSION: The risk of DCS in the GA community is not zero. As GA aircraft performance profiles advance and sales increase, this may have significant implications from a public health and safety perspective. Further study is warranted.Harrison MF, Butler WP, Murad MH, Toups GN. Decompression sickness risk assessment and awareness in general aviation. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2021; 92(3):138145.

A historical review of the U.S. Navy's busiest recompression chamber in the Pacific theater with a current perspective on caring for civilian divers within its area of responsibility: short communication.

On the island Nation of Guam, the United States Department of Defense has stationed military personnel from every service branch. Guam is utilized as a strategic waypoint for the U.S. military in the Pacific theater. As the largest service branch in the region, the Navy has placed a few Diving Medical Officers in Guam to collectively manage and treat patients with recompression therapy. Guam is also a popular tourist destination, with multiple recreational diving companies certifying individuals who are looking to take advantage of the beautiful warm water and exotic marine life. Unfortunately, with an increase in training and certifying inexperienced divers, came an increase in the operational tempo of the U.S. Navy's recompression chamber on Guam. The recompression chamber on Naval Base Guam (NBG) has been treating patients since 1971. With the only multiplace chamber in the Mariana Islands, Diving Medical Officers, with the accompanying chamber staff, treat military personnel, active-duty sponsored patients and civilian patients. Treating civilian patients by military providers through military treatment facilities presents multiple issues that must be addressed in an effort to provide efficient quality medical care. This article reviews the records, documents, and activity of the NBG chamber over the last four decades. Through the obtained data the information provides projected financial reimbursement from civilian patients. The article also sheds light on areas of needed improvement with regard to data collection, third-party financial collection efforts and the necessity of an inclusive electronic health record (EHR) for military and civilian patients.

The demographics and diving behaviour of DAN Asia-Pacific members with and without pre-existing medical conditions.

INTRODUCTION: This report examines Diver Alert Network Asia-Pacific (DAN AP) members with and without cardiac or respiratory conditions, diabetes or hypertension and compares their demographics, health and diving activities. METHODOLOGY: Two online cross-sectional surveys of DAN AP members were conducted. The first sought information from 833 divers who applied for membership between July 2009 and August 2013 and who had declared the targeted medical conditions. The second, conducted between December 2014 and April 2015, was sent to 9,927 current members with known email addresses. The groups were compared for age, gender, body mass index, fitness, smoking and diving qualifications, history, currency and practices. RESULTS: Of 343 (41%) respondents to the first survey, 267 (32%) provided sufficient information for inclusion. Of 1,786 (18%) respondents to the second survey, 1,437 (15%) had no targeted medical condition and were included in the analysis. Those with medical conditions were on average 4.7 years older (P 〈 0.001); more overweight or obese (68% versus 57%, P = 0.001); took more medications (57% vs. 29%, P 〈 0.001), smoked less (4% vs. 7%, P = 0.02) and did less repetitive diving (median 75 vs 90, P 〈 0.001). Other diving demographics were similar. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial number of people are diving with medical conditions and there is a need to better understand the associated risks. Divers need to be well-educated about the potential impact such conditions may have on diving safety and should monitor their health status, especially as they age.

Lower risk of decompression sickness after recommendation of conservative decompression practices in divers with and without vascular right-to-left shunt.

INTRODUCTION: A vascular right-to-left shunt (r/l shunt) is a well-known risk factor for the development of decompression sickness (DCS). No studies to date have examined whether divers with a history of DCS with or without a r/l shunt have a reduced risk of suffering recurrent DCS when diving more conservative dive profiles (CDP). METHODS: Twenty-seven divers with a history of DCS recommended previously to dive more conservatively were included in this study and retrospectively interviewed by phone to determine the incidence of DCS recurrence. RESULTS: Twenty-seven divers performed 17,851 dives before examination in our department and 9,236 after recommendations for conservative diving. Mean follow up was 5.3 years (range 0-11 years). Thirty-eight events of DCS occurred in total, 34 before and four after recommendation of CDP. Four divers had a closure of their patent foramen ovale (PFO). A highly significant reduction of DCS risk was observed after recommendation of CDP for the whole group as well as for the sub-groups with or without a r/l shunt. A significant reduction of DCS risk in respect to r/l shunt size was also observed. DISCUSSION: This study indicates that recommendations to reduce nitrogen load after DCS appear to reduce the risk of developing subsequent DCS. This finding is independent of whether the divers have a r/l shunt or of shunt size. The risk of suffering recurrent DCS after recommendation for CDP is less than or equal to an unselected cohort of divers. CONCLUSION: Recommendation for CDP seems to significantly reduce the risk of recurrent DCS.

The epidemiology of injury in scuba diving.

The epidemiology of injury associated with recreational scuba diving is reviewed. A search of electronic databases and reference lists identified pertinent research. Barotrauma, decompression sickness and drowning-related injuries were the most common morbidities associated with recreational scuba diving. The prevalence of incidents ranged from 7 to 35 injuries per 10,000 divers and from 5 to 152 injuries per 100,000 dives. Recreational scuba diving fatalities account for 0.013% of all-cause mortality aged ≥ 15 years. Drowning was the most common cause of death. Among treated injuries, recovery was complete in the majority of cases. Dive injuries were associated with diver-specific factors such as insufficient training and preexisting medical conditions. Environmental factors included air temperature and flying after diving. Dive-specific factors included loss of buoyancy control, rapid ascent and repetitive deep diving. The most common event to precede drowning was running out of gas (compressed air). Though diving injuries are relatively rare prospective, longitudinal studies are needed to quantify the effects of known risk factors and, indeed, asymptomatic injuries (e.g. brain lesions). Dive injury health economics data also remains wanting. Meanwhile, health promotion initiatives should continue to reinforce adherence to established safe diving practices such as observing depth/time limits, safety stops and conservative ascent rates. However, there is an obvious lack of evaluated diving safety interventions.

Per-capita claims rates for decompression sickness among insured Divers Alert Network members.

Decompression sickness (DCS) in recreational diving is a rare and usually self-limiting injury, but permanent disability can occur. Incidence rate estimates are difficult to establish because the number of divers at risk is usually unknown in population samples with well-documented DCS. We estimated the annual per-capita DCS incidence rates for 2000-2007 based on insurance claims submitted by members of the Divers Alert Network (DAN), Durham, N.C., with dive accident insurance. The overall per-capita DCS claims rate (DCR) was 20.5 per 10,000 member-years. Based on the age-adjusted DCR, males submitted 28% more claims than females. Male-to-female difference was greatest between 35 and 40 years of age and disappeared by the mid-50s. Highest rates were observed in the 30- to 39-year age category, after which DCR declined with increasing age. Highest yearly DCR was estimated in 2002. Insurance dropout rate was greater among those who had DCS in the first year of their insurance compared to those who did not have DCS in their first year.

Risk of neurological decompression sickness in the diver with a right-to-left shunt: literature review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Literature review and meta-analysis to review the evidence of relationship between the presence of right-to-left shunts (RLSs) and the occurrence of neurological decompression sickness (DCS) in divers. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and Health Technology Assessment databases. STUDY SELECTION: Five case-control studies in which the prevalence of a RLS in a group of divers with neurological DCS was compared with that of a group of divers with no history of DCS, 3 cross-transversal studies in which the prevalence of RLS was measured in divers with neurological DCS, and 4 cross-transversal studies in which the prevalence of RLS was measured in divers with no history of DCS were reviewed. DATA EXTRACTION: Only case-control studies were retained for meta-analysis. DATA SYNTHESIS: This meta-analysis gathers 5 studies and 654 divers. The combined odds ratio of neurological DCS in divers with RLS was 4.23 (3.05-5.87). The meta-analysis including only large RLS found a combined odds ratio of 6.49 (4.34-9.71). CONCLUSIONS: Because of a low incidence of neurological DCS, increase in absolute risk of neurological DCS due to RLS is probably small. Thus, in recreational diving, the systematic screening of RLS seems unnecessary. In professional divers, because of a chronic exposition and unknown consequences of cerebral asymptomatic lesions, these results raise again the benefit of the transcranial Doppler in the screening and quantification of the RLS, independently of their location.

The nontechnical causes of diving accidents: can U.S. Navy divers learn from other industries?

Although U.S. Navy diving is remarkably safe, because of the high-risk environment in which military divers work, accidents and mishaps do occur. Failures in leadership and situation awareness (particularly in risk and time assessment) were found to be the two most common causes of fatal and nonfatal U.S. Navy diving accidents and near misses. Responses to an attitude survey showed that junior divers want to ask questions, but senior divers do not desire to be questioned. In other high reliability industries (e.g. aviation, medicine) methods have been developed to identify, analyze and mitigate human error. The relevance of these techniques for U.S. Navy diving are discussed.

Preoxygenation time versus decompression sickness incidence.

Preoxygenation, breathing 100% oxygen prior to decompression, has been used for well over half of this century to reduce decompression sickness (DCS) incidence. Duration of preoxygenation has been reported to be inversely related to subsequent DCS incidence. A direct comparison of DCS incidence at 30,000 ft versus preoxygenation time is needed to allow better-informed decisions regarding the cost vs. benefit of increasing preoxygenation time to prevent DCS. To obtain such a comparison, we accomplished a retrospective study of exposures to 30,000 ft (226 mm Hg; 4.37 psia) while performing mild exercise. The 86 male exposures were preceded by preoxygenation times of one to four hours. Venous gas emboli (VGE) and DCS symptom development were monitored and recorded. Although more protection was demonstrated with increasing preoxygenation time, the cost-to-benefit ratio also increases with each additional increment of preoxygenation time. The diminishing return of increasing preoxygenation to reduce DCS would eventually impact mission planning and crew duty limitations. Alteration in the physiology of denitrogenation, such as inclusion of exercise during preoxygenation, may provide better and more cost-effective DCS protection than simply increasing preoxygenation time.