Use of Bisphosphonates in Elderly Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma.

Background: Bisphosphonates reduce skeletal-related events (SREs) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and, in some studies, improved survival. Since 2011, bisphosphonate use has been recommended by NCCN for all patients with newly diagnosed MM receiving antineoplastic therapy independent of the presence of bone disease. This study investigated their use after these guidelines were established. Methods: We identified patients aged ≥65 years in the SEER-Medicare database with newly diagnosed MM between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2013, who received antineoplastic therapy, had ≥6 months of follow-up, and did not receive prior bisphosphonates. Presence of SREs at diagnosis was identified, including pathologic fracture, spinal cord compression, radiation to bone, or surgery to bone. Use of bisphosphonates was defined as having ≥1 claim for an intravenous or oral bisphosphonate within 6 months after the start of antineoplastic therapy. We used multivariable modeling to compare users with nonusers, controlling for demographic and clinical covariates. We compared overall survival between users and nonusers using proportional hazards analysis. Results: Of 1,309 patients identified, 720 (55%) used a bisphosphonate. Factors associated with use included SRE at diagnosis (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 2.60; 95% CI, 1.98-3.40), hypercalcemia (AOR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.26-2.41), and use of proteasome inhibitor + immunomodulatory imide therapy (AOR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.21-2.39). Chronic kidney disease (AOR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.35-0.66) was associated with decreased use. Bisphosphonate use was associated with reduced mortality (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.56-0.88). Conclusions: Although bisphosphonate use is recommended for all patients with newly diagnosed MM receiving antineoplastic therapy, 45% of patients in the United States did not receive this guideline-recommended care.

A cost-effectiveness analysis of denosumab for the prevention of skeletal-related events in patients with multiple myeloma in the United States of America.

OBJECTIVE: A large, pivotal, phase 3 trial in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) demonstrated that denosumab, compared with zoledronic acid, was non-inferior for the prevention of skeletal-related events (SREs), extended the observed median progression-free survival (PFS) by 10.7 months, and showed significantly less renal toxicity. The cost-effectiveness of denosumab vs zoledronic acid in MM in the US was assessed from societal and payer perspectives. METHODS: The XGEVA Global Economic Model was developed by integrating data from the phase 3 trial comparing the efficacy of denosumab with zoledronic acid for the prevention of SREs in MM. SRE rates were adjusted to reflect the real-world incidence. The model included utility decrements for SREs, administration, serious adverse events (SAEs), and disease progression. Drug, administration, SRE management, SAEs, and anti-MM treatment costs were based on data from published studies. For the societal perspective, the model additionally included SRE-related direct non-medical costs and indirect costs. The net monetary benefit (NMB) was calculated using a willingness-to-pay threshold of US$150,000. One-way deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted. RESULTS: From a societal perspective, compared with zoledronic acid, the use of denosumab resulted in an incremental cost of US$26,329 and an incremental quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) of 0.2439, translating into a cost per QALY gained of US$107,939 and a NMB of US$10,259 in favor of denosumab. Results were sensitive to SRE rates and PFS parameters. LIMITATIONS: Costs were estimated from multiple sources, which varied by tumor type, patient population, country, and other parameters. PFS and overall survival were extrapolated beyond the follow-up of the primary analysis using fitted parametric curves. CONCLUSION: Denosumab's efficacy in delaying or preventing SREs, potential to improve PFS, and lack of renal toxicity make it a cost-effective option for the prevention of SREs in MM compared with zoledronic acid.

Cost-effectiveness of denosumab versus zoledronic acid for preventing skeletal-related events in the Czech Republic.

AIMS: This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of the subcutaneous RANKL inhibitor, denosumab, vs the intravenous bisphosphonate, zoledronic acid, for the prevention of skeletal-related events (SREs) in patients with prostate cancer, breast cancer, and other solid tumors (OST) in the Czech Republic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A lifetime Markov model was developed to compare the effects of denosumab and zoledronic acid on costs (including drug costs and administration, patient management, SREs, and adverse events), quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios from a national payer perspective. Different discount rates, time horizons, SRE rates, distributions, and nature (asymptomatic vs all SREs), and the inclusion of treatment discontinuation were considered in scenario analyses. The robustness of the model was tested using deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: Across tumor types, denosumab was associated with fewer SREs, improved QALYs, and higher total costs over a lifetime. The incremental cost per QALY gained for denosumab vs zoledronic acid was 382,673 CZK for prostate cancer, 408,450 CZK for breast cancer, and 608,133 CZK for OST. Incremental costs per SRE avoided for the same tumor type were 54,007 CZK, 51,765 CZK, and 94,426 CZK, respectively. In scenario analyses, the results remained similar to baseline, when different discount rates and time horizons were considered. At a non-official willingness-to-pay threshold of 1.2 million CZK, the probabilities of denosumab being cost-effective vs zoledronic acid were 0.64, 0.67, and 0.49 for prostate cancer, breast cancer, and OST, respectively. LIMITATIONS: The SRE rates used were obtained from clinical trials; studies suggest rates may be higher in clinical practice. Additional evidence on real-world SRE rates could further improve the accuracy of the modeling. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with zoledronic acid, denosumab provides a cost-effective treatment option for the prevention of SREs in patients with prostate cancer, breast cancer, and OST in the Czech Republic.

Skeletal health in long-duration astronauts: nature, assessment, and management recommendations from the NASA Bone Summit.

Concern about the risk of bone loss in astronauts as a result of prolonged exposure to microgravity prompted the National Aeronautics and Space Administration to convene a Bone Summit with a panel of experts at the Johnson Space Center to review the medical data and research evidence from astronauts who have had prolonged exposure to spaceflight. Data were reviewed from 35 astronauts who had served on spaceflight missions lasting between 120 and 180 days with attention focused on astronauts who (1) were repeat fliers on long-duration missions, (2) were users of an advanced resistive exercise device (ARED), (3) were scanned by quantitative computed tomography (QCT) at the hip, (4) had hip bone strength estimated by finite element modeling, or (5) had lost >10% of areal bone mineral density (aBMD) at the hip or lumbar spine as measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Because of the limitations of DXA in describing the effects of spaceflight on bone strength, the panel recommended that the U.S. space program use QCT and finite element modeling to further study the unique effects of spaceflight (and recovery) on bone health in order to better inform clinical decisions.

Pharmacoeconomics of bisphosphonates for skeletal-related event prevention in metastatic non-breast solid tumours.

Bisphosphonates reduce the risk of skeletal-related events (SREs; i.e. spinal cord compression, pathological fracture, radiation or surgery to the bone, and hypercalcaemia) in patients with metastatic cancer. A number of analyses have been conducted to assess the cost effectiveness of bisphosphonates in patients with bone metastases secondary to breast cancer, but few in other solid tumours. This is a review of cost-effectiveness analyses in patients with non-breast solid tumours and bone metastases. A literature search was conducted to identify cost-effectiveness analyses reporting the cost per QALY gained of bisphosphonates in patients with metastatic bone disease secondary to non-breast solid tumours. Four analyses met inclusion criteria. These included two in prostate cancer (one of which used a global perspective but expressed results in $US, and the other reported from a multiple country perspective: France, Germany, Portugal and the Netherlands). The remaining analyses were in lung cancer (in the UK, France, Germany, Portugal and the Netherlands), and renal cell carcinoma (in the UK, France and Germany). In each analysis, the cost effectiveness of zoledronic acid versus placebo was analysed. Zoledronic acid was found to be cost effective in all European countries across all three indications but not in the sole global prostate cancer analysis. Across countries and indications, assumptions regarding patient survival, drug cost and baseline utility (i.e. patient utility with metastatic disease but without an SRE) were the most robust drivers of modelled estimates. Assumptions of SRE-related costs were most often the second strongest cost driver. Further review indicated that particular attention should be paid to the inclusion or exclusion of nonsignificant survival benefits, whether health state utilities were elicited from community or patient samples or author assumptions, delineation between symptomatic and asymptomatic SREs, and the methods with which SRE disutility was modelled over time. While the field of cost-effectiveness analysis in solid tumours other than breast cancer is still evolving, outcomes will likely continue to be driven by drug cost and assumptions regarding treatment benefits. Although considerations such as adverse events and administration costs are important, they were not found to influence cost-effectiveness estimates greatly. As zoledronic acid will lose patent protection in 2013 and subsequently be greatly reduced in price, it is likely that the field of cost effectiveness will change with regard to SRE-limiting agents. Meanwhile, research should be conducted to improve our understanding of the impact on quality of life and medical costs of preventing SREs.

Medical management of asymptomatic primary hyperparathyroidism: proceedings of the third international workshop.

BACKGROUND: Primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) is a common endocrine disorder that is frequently asymptomatic. The 2002 International Workshop on Asymptomatic PHPT addressed medical management of asymptomatic PHPT and summarized the data on nonsurgical approaches to this disease. At the Third International Workshop on Asymptomatic PHPT held in May 2008, this subject was reviewed again in light of data that have since become available. We present the results of a literature review of advances in the medical management of PHPT. METHODS: A series of questions was developed by the International Task Force on PHPT. A comprehensive literature search for relevant studies evaluating the management of PHPT with bisphosphonates, hormone replacement therapy, raloxifene, and calcimimetics was conducted. Existing guidelines and recent unpublished data were also reviewed. All selected relevant articles were reviewed, and the questions developed by the International Task Force were addressed by the Consensus Panel. RESULTS: Bisphosphonates and hormone replacement therapy are effective in decreasing bone turnover in patients with PHPT and improving bone mineral density (BMD). Fracture data are not available with either treatment. Raloxifene also lowers bone turnover in patients with PHPT. None of these agents, however, significantly lowers serum calcium or PTH levels. The calcimimetic cinacalcet reduces both serum calcium and PTH levels and raises serum phosphorus. Cinacalcet does not, however, reduce bone turnover or improve BMD. CONCLUSIONS: Bisphosphonates and hormone replacement therapy provide skeletal protection in patients with PHPT. Limited data are available regarding skeletal protection in patients with PHPT treated with raloxifene. Calcimimetics favorably alter serum calcium and PTH in PHPT but do not significantly affect either bone turnover or BMD. Medical management of asymptomatic PHPT is a promising option for those who are not candidates for parathyroidectomy.

Management of bisphosphonate treatment in clinical practice.

Bisphosphonates have become important tools for the treatment of bone lesions from various solid tumors or from multiple myeloma. Management of bone health in patients with malignant bone disease from breast cancer, prostate cancer, lung cancer, and multiple myeloma was discussed in clinical case workshops held during the ZENITH meeting (April 2007, Prague, Czech Republic). Physicians in attendance were generally in agreement that bisphosphonate therapy is recommended for treatment of bone metastases and that treatment should be sustained over the duration of disease progression. Consensus is still evolving regarding the optimal duration of therapy and the emerging role of bisphosphonates in the management of bone loss in the adjuvant setting. Bisphosphonates have proven efficacy in reducing and delaying skeletal-related events in patients with bone metastases, and play a key role in preserving patient functional independence and quality of life. Furthermore, bisphosphonate therapy is a cost-effective strategy in the care of patients with bone metastases compared with the cost of treatment for fractures and other skeletal complications. Finally, communication with patients is critical to increase awareness of the benefits of bisphosphonate therapy. Increased patient involvement with treatment decisions will likely encourage patient compliance and thereby maximize clinical benefit from bisphosphonate therapy.

Uncovering the "skeleton in the closet": the issue of bone and joint disorders in the Maldives and the opportunities for primary prevention and health promotion.

Disorders of bones and joints are the most common cause of severe long-term pain and disability around the world yet receive inadequate attention in many countries. Bone/joint health is absent from current health policy and the primary prevention/health promotion agenda in Maldives and diagnostic and curative infrastructure is very limited. In 2004, tentative evidence emerged indicating that degenerative bone and joint conditions may impose a large burden on community health. A study was undertaken amongst a representative community sample of women aged 15-50 to further investigate the issue. One third reported bone/joint problems; very high proportions manifested a range of osteoporosis risk factors, and sizeable numbers appear to be at elevated risk of osteoarthritis. Bone/joint health knowledge was very limited. The findings suggest strong potential for primary prevention on modifiable risk factors, need for research with other population groups, and development of screening and curative care. EDITORS' STRATEGIC IMPLICATIONS: The author provides important data on the burden of disorders of bones/joints on a "developing" community and presents recommendations for behavioral and educational prevention strategies that may prove useful across societies.

Cost effectiveness of bisphosphonates in the management of breast cancer patients with bone metastases.

BACKGROUND: Bisphosphonates are recommended to prevent skeletal related events (SREs) in patients with breast cancer and bone metastases (BCBM). However, their clinical and economic profiles vary from one agent to the other. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using modeling techniques, we simulated from the perspective of the UK's National Health Service (NHS) the cost and quality adjusted survival (QALY) associated with five commonly-used bisphosphonates or no therapy in this patient population. The simulation followed patients into several health states (i.e. alive or dead, experiencing an SRE or no SRE, and receiving first or second line therapy). Drugs costs, infusion costs, SREs costs, and utility values were estimated from published sources. Utilities were applied to time with and without SREs to capture the impact on quality of life. RESULTS: Compared to no therapy, all bisphosphonates are either cost saving or highly cost-effective (with a cost per QALY < or = 6126 pounds sterlings). Within this evaluation, zoledronic acid was more effective and less expensive than all other options. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our model, the use of bisphosphonates in breast cancer patients with bone metastases should lead to improved patient outcomes and cost savings to the NHS and possibly other similar entities.

Superior effects of high-dose enzyme replacement therapy in type 1 Gaucher disease on bone marrow involvement and chitotriosidase levels: a 2-center retrospective analysis.

Dosing of enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) for Gaucher disease type 1 is still a subject of debate and varies from 15 to 130 U/kg/mo, making a huge economic difference of 70,000 US dollars to 380,000 US dollars(euro55,000-300,000) per patient per year. To investigate whether this difference in dosing ultimately translates into a different response, we retrospectively compared long-term outcome of ERT at 2 large European treatment centers, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (n = 49, median dose, 15-30 U/kg/4 wks) and Heinrich-Heine University, Duesseldorf, Germany (n = 57, median dose, 80 U/kg/4 wks). These adult cohorts had a similar genetic background. All follow-up parameters were matched separately at baseline, to avoid bias with respect to disease severity. Improvement in hemoglobin, platelet count, and hepatosplenomegaly was not significantly different between both cohorts, whereas plasma chitotriosidase and bone marrow involvement by magnetic resonance imaging improved more quickly and was more pronounced in the higher-dosed group. Major bone complications rarely occurred in both groups. In conclusion, different dosing regimens of ERT do not affect outcome of hematologic and visceral parameters, but higher dosing leads to accelerated decrease of chitotriosidase and better objective bone response in adult type 1 Gaucher disease.

Assessment of phosphorus and calcium metabolism and its clinical management in hemodialysis patients in the community of Valencia.

AIM: The objective of the study was to determine the situation concerning mineral metabolism and bone disease in hemodialysis (HD) patients living in the community of Valencia (Spain), as well as the clinical practices for bone disease control in relation to the laboratory targets recommended in the National Kidney Foundation Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initiative (K/DOQI) guidelines. METHODS: In December 2003, a cross-sectional study was performed including 2392 patients (1485 males and 907 females) from 43 different centers in the council of Valencia (the entire HD population). Mean age was 65.8 +/- 14 yrs. Cut-off levels for the study of calcium, phosphorus, calcium-phosphorus product (Ca x P) and parathyroid hormone (PTH) were performed following the recommendations of the K/DOQI guidelines. RESULTS: The mean values for calcium were 9.57 +/- 0.7 mg/dL, phosphorus 4.97 +/- 1.5 mg/dL, intact PTH (iPTH) 297 +/- 353 pg/mL, Ca x P 47.5 +/- 15 mg2/dL2. Hypocalcemia (<8.4 mg/dL) was present in 5% of patients, whereas 17.8% of patients presented hypercalcemia (>10.2 mg/dL), 60.3% of whom received vitamin D. Hypophosphoremia (<3.5 mg/dL) was present in 16% of patients, and 29% of patients presented hyperphosphoremia (>5.5 mg/dL). Ca x P was <55 mg2/dL2 in 73% of patients. Thirty one percent of patients presented secondary hyperparathyroidism (HPTH >300 pg/mL), being severe in 12% (>600 pg/mL); 43% of patients presented iPTH <150 pg/mL. Only 7.3% of patients achieved the four recommendations provided in the K/DOQI guidelines. Vitamin D treatment was administered in 48% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The population undergoing dialysis in the community of Valencia achieved targets based on the clinical recommendations of the K/DOQI guidelines as follows: 45% of patients achieved targets for calcium, 55% for phosphorus, 73% for Ca x P and 26% for iPTH levels. Surprisingly, only 7.3% of patients achieved all four targets.

The clinical and cost considerations of bisphosphonates in preventing bone complications in patients with metastatic breast cancer or multiple myeloma.

The bisphosphonates are potent inhibitors of osteoclast-mediated bone resorption and are now the treatment of choice for the management of hypercalcaemia of malignancy. The incidences of hypercalcaemia and other skeletal complications (bone pain, pathological fracture) remain high despite apparent responses to systemic therapy, with particularly high event rates in women with advanced skeletal metastases of breast cancer. This review focuses on studies addressing the long-term efficacy of bisphosphonates to reduce skeletal complications in breast cancer (5 studies) and multiple myeloma (4 studies), with particular reference to controlled studies of sufficient magnitude and duration to allow confidence in the estimation of efficacy. Bearing in mind the limitations of differences in trial design and the lack of direct studies comparing drugs, adequate exposure to a bisphosphonate reduces the incidence of skeletal complication by 30 to 40% in both breast cancer and multiple myeloma. Oral clondronate and intravenous pamidronate have similar efficacy in both diseases, but the duration of efficacy may differ between drugs. Both agents have shown intriguing survival benefits in subgroups of patients. The numbers needed to treat (NNT) to prevent a skeletal complication during one year are lowest in metastatic skeletal disease in breast cancer (NNT < 8) but also compare very favourably with other disease for patients with recurrent nonskeletal breast cancer or multiple myeloma (NNTs 7 to 31 depending on the complication to be prevented). Treatment costs of both breast cancer and multiple myloma are driven by inpatient and outpatient hospital visits so that bisphosphonate regimens should be developed that reduce both. Further research is required to determine if subgroups of patients can be better identified that will derive particular benefit, or perhaps no benefit at all, from bisphosphonate therapy. It is not known whether more potent bisphosphonates will deliver greater clinical efficacy in the future.

Drug-induced rheumatic disorders: incidence, prevention and management.

The purpose of this article is to review the causes, the clinical manifestations and the management of the more frequent drug-induced rheumatic disorders. These include: (i) articular and periarticular manifestations induced by fluoroquinolones, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, injections of corticosteroids, and retinoids; (ii) multisystemic manifestations such as drug-induced lupus and arthritis induced by vaccination, Bacillus Calmette-Guerin therapy and cytokines; (iii) drug-induced disorders of bone metabolism (corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis, drug-induced osteomalacia and osteonecrosis); and (iv) iatrogenic complex regional pain syndromes. Disorders caused by nonpharmacological and rarely used treatments have been deliberately excluded. Knowledge of these drug-induced clinical symptoms or syndromes allows an earlier diagnosis and treatment, and earlier drug withdrawal if necessary. With the introduction of new medications such as the recombinant cytokines and antiretroviral treatments, the number of drug-induced rheumatic disorders is likely to increase.