Comparison of fecal pyruvate kinase isoform M2 and calprotectin in assessment of pediatric inflammatory bowel disease severity and activity.

AIMS: Accurate assessment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) activity is the cornerstone of effective therapy. Fecal M2 isoform of pyruvate kinase (M2-PK) and fecal calprotectin (FC) are noninvasive markers of mucosal inflammation in IBD. The aim of this study was to compare performance of M2-PK and FC in assessment of pediatric ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) severity and activity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 121 patients with IBD, including 75 with UC and 46 with CD were recruited. Control group consisted of 35 healthy children (HS). Patients were assigned to groups depending on disease severity and activity. M2-PK and calprotectin concentration were determined in stool samples using ELISA. Areas under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) for FC and M2-PK with cut-off level at which M2-PK specificity was matching FC specificity were calculated and compared. RESULTS: Performance of M2-PK at identifying patients with IBD, UC and CD among HS was inferior to FC. The differences in AUC were respectively: -0.10 (95% confidence interval [CI] [-0.13-(-0.06)], p<0.0001), -0.14 (95% CI [-0.19-(-0.09)], p<0.0001) and -0.03 (95% CI [-0.05-(-0.001)], p<0.02). M2-PK was inferior to FC in discriminating patients with mild UC from those with HS (AUC difference -0.23, 95% CI [-0.31-(-0.15)], p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: FC reflects pediatric IBD severity and activity better than M2-PK. This difference is particularly pronounced when identifying patients with mild UC and UC in remission.

Prevalence of pancreatic insufficiency in inflammatory bowel diseases. Assessment by fecal elastase-1.

Pancreatic insufficiency (PI) may be an extraintestinal manifestation of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). We report the results of a cross-sectional study that was carried out to investigate both the prevalence of PI in IBD patients and its clinical course over a 6-month follow-up period. In total, 100 Crohn's disease (CD) patients, 100 ulcerative colitis (UC) patients, and 100 controls were screened for PI by the fecal elastase-1 (FE-1) test. The decision limits employed were: < or =200 microg/g stool for PI and < or =100 microg/g for severe PI. Patients with abnormal FE-1 values were re-tested after 6 months. Odds ratios (OR) for PI were estimated by unconditional logistic regression analysis. PI was found in 22 UC and 14 CD patients. The OR for the FE-1 test < or =200 microg/g was 10.5 [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.5-44.8] for IBD patients compared to the controls. The risk of PI was related to three or more bowel movements per day (OR = 25.0), the passage of loose stools (OR = 7.7), and previous surgery (OR = 3.7). At the 6-month follow-up, FE-1 values became normal in 24 patients and showed persistently low concentrations in 12. These patients had a larger number of bowel movements per day (OR = 5.4), previous surgery (OR = 5.7), and a longer duration of the disease (OR = 4.2). PI is frequently found in IBD patients, particularly in those with loose stools, a larger number of bowel movements/day and previous surgery. PI is reversible in most patients, and persistent PI is not associated with clinically active disease.

Assessment of thiopurine methyltransferase enzyme activity is superior to genotype in predicting myelosuppression following azathioprine therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

BACKGROUND: Myelosuppression occurs in 2-7% of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients treated with azathioprine, and can be associated with reduced activity of thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT) in some patients. It has been proposed that pretreatment assessment of TPMT status reduces the incidence of toxicity and is cost-effective. AIMS: To determine if screening for TPMT status predicts side-effects to azathioprine in patients with IBD and to ascertain whether screening by TPMT enzyme activity or genotype is superior. METHODS: Sequential IBD patients were identified and azathioprine tolerance recorded. Blood was collected for measurement of TPMT activity and TPMT*3C, TPMT*3A and TPMT*2 genotypes. RESULTS: Of 130 patients, 25% stopped azathioprine because of toxicity. Four patients experienced severe myelosuppression (WCC < 2). Eleven of 17 patients with reduced TPMT activity were heterozygotes, including one patient with marked TPMT deficiency who experienced severe myelosuppression. There was no association between intermediate TPMT deficiency and any side-effect. CONCLUSIONS: Moderate reduction of TPMT activity in heterozygotes was not associated with toxicity, but very low TPMT activity caused severe myelosuppression in one patient. This would have been predicted by measuring TPMT activity but not by genotyping. Measurement of TPMT activity may therefore be superior to genotype in predicting severe myelosuppression.

Thiopurine methyltransferase enzyme activity determination before treatment of inflammatory bowel disease with azathioprine: effect on cost and adverse events.

BACKGROUND: Azathioprine (AZA), used to treat inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), is metabolized by thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT). The accumulation of individual metabolites varies because humans display genetic polymorphism for TPMT expression. Deficiencies in TPMT result in accumulation of toxic metabolites, followed by neutropenia and hepatic inflammation. Concern over acute toxicity frequently leads to under dosing and frequent monitoring tests and visits. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether assessment of TPMT activity before the administration of AZA would predict acute toxicity and, thus, allow for reductions in health care costs related to biochemical screening for, and management of, AZA-induced adverse events. METHODS: Before AZA treatment, 29 patients with IBD were prospectively randomized to one of two groups: group 1, in which no TPMT assay was performed, was started on AZA at 1 mg/kg/day and then titrated every two weeks to a target dose of 2.5 mg/kg/day; and group 2, in which TPMT assays were performed, was started on AZA at the target dose of 2.5 mg/kg/day. For both groups, complete blood count and liver enzymes were monitored weekly for six weeks and at monthly intervals thereafter. Additional tests and health care interventions were undertaken at the discretion of the attending physicians. RESULTS: Of the 29 patients in the study, 15 were randomly assigned to group 1 and 14 to group 2. Demographics and disease activity were similar for both groups. Mean follow-up time was 7.1 months (range 3.5 to 10.7 months). Eight patients from group 1 and six patients from group 2 withdrew as a result of AZA-induced adverse events. There was no correlation between the TPMT activity and the development of AZA-induced adverse events. The direct health care costs for group 1 (300.11 dollars per patient) were lower than in group 2 (348.87 dollars per patient). CONCLUSION: The prospective assessment of TPMT enzyme activity before initiating AZA therapy in IBD patients incurred additional cost and did not predict AZA-induced toxicity.