Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31500183

RESUMO

Because of exposure to a number of potential health hazards within the work environment, hairstylists experience occupational diseases that include occupational asthma, skin conditions and musculoskeletal diseases. The paucity of studies assessing occupational safety and hygiene management among Afro-Caribbean hair salon operators in the UK promoted the study. QualtricsTM was used to assess the participants' perception of exposure to hair products and their personal safety and hygiene knowledge, attitudes, awareness, and risk perceptions at work. In five salons, indoor air quality was monitored over one working week for selected environmental pollutants: temperature, humidity, CO, CO2 and Total Volatile Organic Compounds (TVOCs) using a GrayWolf Direct Sense Indoor Air Quality-IAQ (IQ-610). The use of unflued gas heating to raise the indoor temperature was common among the salons' operators which explains the high carbon monoxide readings recorded. Itchy eyes and nose (44.4%) shoulder, neck and back pain (39.2%) were frequently reported. Age-stratified analysis of reported occupational ailments showed participants within an age bracket of 31-35 reported allergies (24%) and itchy eyes and nose (19.1%) as the most common of occupational ailments. Respiratory, skin and musculoskeletal symptoms ranked as major occupational ill-health experiences among the study population. The study outcome demonstrated that the type of activity and the hair products used play an important role in the level of pollutants in the working environment. The substitution of the more harmful hair products with safer alternatives is needed, as is the encouragement of health surveillance.


Assuntos
Preparações para Cabelo/intoxicação , Higiene , Exposição Ocupacional/análise , Saúde Ocupacional , Adolescente , Adulto , Poluição do Ar em Ambientes Fechados/análise , Feminino , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doenças Musculoesqueléticas/induzido quimicamente , Doenças Profissionais/induzido quimicamente , Inquéritos e Questionários , Reino Unido , Compostos Orgânicos Voláteis/análise , Adulto Jovem
2.
J Environ Public Health ; 2017: 5120504, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28713433

RESUMO

In countries with fluoridation of public water, it is imperative to determine other dietary sources of fluoride intake to reduce the public health risk of chronic exposure. New Zealand has one of the highest per capita consumption rates of black tea internationally and is one of the few countries to artificially fluoridate public water; yet no information is available to consumers on the fluoride levels in tea products. In this study, we determined the contribution of black tea as a source of dietary fluoride intake by measuring the fluoride content in 18 brands of commercially available products in New Zealand. Fluoride concentrations were measured by potentiometric method with a fluoride ion-selective electrode and the contribution of black tea to Adequate Intake (AI) and Tolerable Upper Intake Level (UL) was calculated for a range of consumption scenarios. We examined factors that influence the fluoride content in manufactured tea and tea infusions, as well as temporal changes in fluoride exposure from black tea. We review the international evidence regarding chronic fluoride intake and its association with chronic pain, arthritic disease, and musculoskeletal disorders and provide insights into possible association between fluoride intake and the high prevalence of these disorders in New Zealand.


Assuntos
Fluoretos/análise , Saúde Pública , Chá/química , Artrite/induzido quimicamente , Dor Crônica/induzido quimicamente , Dieta , Fluoretos/efeitos adversos , Doenças Musculoesqueléticas/induzido quimicamente , Nova Zelândia , Medição de Risco
3.
Pediatrics ; 134(1): e146-53, 2014 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24918220

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Safety concerns for fluoroquinolones exist from animal studies demonstrating cartilage injury in weight-bearing joints, dependent on dose and duration of therapy. For children treated with levofloxacin or comparator in randomized, prospective, comparative studies for acute otitis media and community-acquired pneumonia, this 5-year follow-up safety study was designed to assess the presence/absence of cartilage injury. METHODS: Children enrolled in treatment studies were also enrolled in a 1-year follow-up safety study, which; focused on musculoskeletal adverse events (MSAE). Those with persisting MSAEs, protocol-defined musculoskeletal disorders, or of concern to the Data Safety and Monitoring Committee were requested to enroll in four additional years of follow-up, the subject of this report. RESULTS: Of the 2233 subjects participating in the 12-month follow-up study, 124 of 1340 (9%) of the levofloxacin subjects, and 83 of 893 (9%) of the comparator subjects were continued for 5-year posttreatment assessment. From children identified with an MSAE during years 2 through 5 posttreatment, the number that were "possibly related" to drug therapy was equal for both arms: 1 of 1340 for levofloxacin and 1 of 893 for comparator. Of all cases of MSAE assessed by the Data Safety and Monitoring Committee at 5 years' posttreatment, no case was assessed as "likely related" to study drug. CONCLUSIONS: With no clinically detectable difference between levofloxacin- and comparator-treated children in MSAEs presenting between 1 and 5 years in these safety studies, risks of cartilage injury with levofloxacin appear to be uncommon, are clinically undetectable during 5 years, or are reversible.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/toxicidade , Doenças das Cartilagens/induzido quimicamente , Levofloxacino/toxicidade , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Doenças Musculoesqueléticas/induzido quimicamente , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Tempo
4.
Pain Pract ; 14(4): 378-95, 2014 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23941628

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Gastroprotective agents (GPA) substantially reduce morbidity and mortality with long-term nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and aspirin. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate efficacy of NSAIDs, protection against NSAID-induced gastrointestinal harm, and balance of benefit and risk. METHODS: Free text searches of PubMed (December 2012) supplemented with "related citation" and "cited by" facilities on PubMed and Google Scholar for patient requirements, NSAID effectiveness, pain relief benefits, gastroprotective strategies, adherence to gastroprotection prescribing, and serious harm with NSAIDs and GPA. RESULTS: Patients want 50% reduction in pain intensity and improved fatigue, distress, and quality of life. Meta-analyses of NSAID trials in musculoskeletal conditions had bimodal responses with good pain relief or little. Number needed to treat (NNTs) for good pain relief were 3 to 9. Proton pump inhibitors (PPI) and high-dose histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2 RA) provided similar gastroprotection, with no conclusive evidence of greater PPI efficacy compared with high-dose H2 RA. Prescriber adherence to guidance on use of GPA with NSAIDS was 49% in studies published since 2005; patient adherence was less than 100%. PPI use at higher doses over longer periods is associated with increased risk of serious adverse events, including fracture; no such evidence was found for H2 RA. Patients with chronic conditions are more willing to accept risk of harm for successful treatment than their physicians. CONCLUSION: Guidance on NSAIDs use should ensure that patients have a good level of pain relief and that gastroprotection is guaranteed for the NSAID delivering good pain relief. Fixed-dose combinations of NSAID plus GPA offer one solution.


Assuntos
Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/efeitos adversos , Gastroenteropatias/induzido quimicamente , Gastroenteropatias/prevenção & controle , Animais , Análise Custo-Benefício , Antagonistas dos Receptores H2 da Histamina/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Metanálise como Assunto , Doenças Musculoesqueléticas/induzido quimicamente , Doenças Musculoesqueléticas/prevenção & controle , Dor/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/uso terapêutico , PubMed/estatística & dados numéricos , Medição de Risco
5.
Clin J Oncol Nurs ; 16(3): 260-6, 2012 Jun 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22641317

RESUMO

Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are recommended as adjuvant endocrine therapy for postmenopausal women with hormone-responsive breast cancer. With the widespread use of AI adjuvant endocrine therapy, a significant profile of musculoskeletal symptoms has emerged. Moderate to severe musculoskeletal symptoms have led some women to discontinue therapy, compromising the survival benefit. The etiology of AI-related musculoskeletal symptoms is poorly understood, which challenges development of effective management strategies. The purpose of this article is to describe AI-related musculoskeletal symptoms, review possible causes, provide assessment guidelines, and recommend management strategies based on the best available evidence. Little evidence exists for effective management strategies of AI-related musculoskeletal symptoms, and randomized clinical trials are needed to establish effective interventions. A thorough musculoskeletal assessment can help guide clinical decision making for the best individual management approach. Providers need to manage symptoms with the best available evidence to minimize symptom distress and maximize adherence to AI therapy.


Assuntos
Inibidores da Aromatase/efeitos adversos , Doenças Musculoesqueléticas/induzido quimicamente , Doenças Musculoesqueléticas/enfermagem , Avaliação em Enfermagem , Enfermagem Baseada em Evidências , Feminino , Humanos , Doenças Musculoesqueléticas/diagnóstico por imagem , Doenças Musculoesqueléticas/fisiopatologia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Radiografia , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA