Unravelling the health and economic burden of interstitial lung diseases in adults in Australia.

BACKGROUND: Interstitial lung diseases (ILD) are a heterogenous group of over 200 disorders affecting the pulmonary interstitium. Although there have been advances in knowledge on ILDs in Australia, the characterisation of the health and economic burden of disease remained largely undetermined until recently. OBJECTIVE: The main objective of this review is to provide a synopsis of health and economic burden of ILDs in Australia, based on recently completed research. DISCUSSION: Recent research has demonstrated that idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is the most frequent ILD in Australia. Incidence and prevalence of IPF have demonstrated an increasing trend over the past decades. Mortality has also increased over the past decades, but has shown a slight decreasing trend recently, since the introduction of antifibrotic medication. Health-related quality of life is poor in patients with IPF, and care is estimated to cost approximately AU$299 million per year in Australia. Early diagnosis and referral to tertiary care is crucial for favourable outcomes, and general practitioners are considerably important to this as the first interface to identify patients at risk and detect early symptoms of ILDs.

[Diffuse interstitial lung disease of possible occupational origin treated at the Navarra Health Service. Navarra, Spain, 2017-2022]. / Enfermedad pulmonar intersticial difusa de posible origen laboral atendida en el Servicio Navarro de Salud. Navarra, España, 2017-2022.

INTRODUCTION: Diffuse interstitial lung disease (ILD) describes a broad group of pulmonary inflammatory and fibrosis disorders. Asbestosis and silicosis are the main causes linked to occupational exposure. The aim of this study was to estimate the proportion of cases with possible occupational origin and describe their exposure, clinical, and occupational status. METHOD: We conducted a retrospective longitudinal study of ILD cases between 2017 - 2022 at the University Hospital of Navarra was conducted. Information was supplemented with interviews of cases with possible occupational origin. The occupational proportion was calculated, labor and clinical characteristics analyzed, by statistical comparison of percentages and means. RESULTS: Out of 1067 ILD cases, 56 had a possible occupational origin 5,2% (95% CI 3,9-6,6%). 36 (64,3%) corresponded to asbestosis, 15 (26,8%) to silicosis, and 5 (8,9%) to unspecified pneumoconiosis. The most frequent activities in silicosis were "stone cutting-carving" and in asbestosis "manufacture of iron products". The average age of asbestosis cases was higher than that of silicosis cases (78,2 vs. 67,3 years), as well as their clinical manifestation. Five cases (8,9%) had been recognized as occupational diseases. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of a computer tool in medical records has made it possible to estimate the magnitude and assess the evolution of occupational ILD treated in the Public Health Service. Economic activities reflect the economic risk structure of the region. However, there is a lack of recognition of these diseases as occupational illnesses and they represent a preventable burden of respiratory disease.

Introducción: La enfermedad pulmonar intersticial difusa (EPID) describe un amplio grupo de trastornos con inflamación y fibrosis pulmonar. La asbestosis y la silicosis son las principales causas por exposición laboral. El objetivo de este trabajo fue estimar la proporción de casos de posible origen laboral y describir la exposición, situación clínica y laboral.  Método: Estudio longitudinal retrospectivo de los casos de EPID, en el período 2017-2022 en el Hospital Universitario de Navarra. Se completó la información con entrevista a los casos de posible origen laboral.  Resultados: De un total de 1067 casos de EPID, 56 tuvieron un posible origen laboral, 5,2% (3,9-6,6 IC 95%) 36 (64,3%) correspondieron a asbestosis, 15 (26,8%) a silicosis y 5 (8,9%) a neumoconiosis no especificada. Las actividades más frecuentes en silicosis fueron "corte-tallado de piedra" y para asbestosis "fabricación productos hierro". La media de edad de los casos de asbestosis fue superior a los de silicosis (78,2 vs. 67,3 años), así como su afectación clínica. Cinco casos (8,9%) habían sido reconocidos como enfermedad profesional  Conclusiones: La implementación de una herramienta informática en historia clínica ha hecho posible estimar la magnitud y valorar la evolución de las EPID laborales atendidas en el servicio nacional de salud. Las actividades económicas reflejan la estructura económica de riesgo de la región. Sin embargo, existe una falta de su reconocimiento como enfermedad profesional y suponen una carga de enfermedad respiratoria evitable.

Health care costs and utilization of progressive fibrosing lung disease by underlying interstitial lung disease type.

BACKGROUND: Fibrosing interstitial lung disease (ILD) encompasses more than 200 diverse pulmonary disorders, of which up to 40% become progressive. The 4 underlying ILD types most likely to result in progression are unclassified ILD/idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP), autoimmune ILDs, exposure-related ILD/hypersensitivity pneumonitis, and sarcoidosis. OBJECTIVE: To compare health care resource utilization (HCRU) and costs among patients with fibrosing ILD that has progressed ("progressive" fibrosing cohort) vs patients whose fibrosis did not meet criteria set for progression ("not yet progressed" cohort). METHODS: This was a noninterventional study of commercial enrollees and Medicare Advantage with Part D beneficiaries, which used administrative claims data for the period from October 1, 2015, through May 31, 2021. Adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with fibrosing ILD and 12 months of continuous health plan enrollment were included. Patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, baseline ILD diagnoses, or missing demographic data were excluded. Patients were first classified according to the underlying type of fibrosing ILD. For statistical analyses of outcomes, 2 cohorts were compared within each subtype: progressive fibrosing ILD vs not yet progressed ILD. The final study population included propensity score-matched (PSM) patients (1:1) based on pre-ILD baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. HCRU categories included inpatient hospitalization counts and the number of inpatient days and total costs (in 2021 US dollars), analyzed descriptively and weighted by the per-patient-per-month cost. Lin's regression was used to predict 12-month total cost estimates for comparison by cohort. RESULTS: The distribution by underlying conditions was as follows: autoimmune ILD (n = 4,156), HP (n = 8,181), sarcoidosis (n = 775), and unclassified ILD/IIP (n = 18,635). After PSM, pre-ILD baseline variables were generally well balanced between the progressive and not yet progressed fibrosing ILD cohorts. For all underlying subtypes of ILD, patients in the progressive cohort had significantly more utilization and higher costs compared with patients in the not yet progressed cohort. Progressive cohorts had significantly higher adjusted rates of inpatient days among patients with at least 1 inpatient stay compared with the not yet progressed cohorts (all P < 0.01). In addition, the progressive cohorts had significantly higher adjusted 12-month total costs, with the differences ranging from $24,493 to $55,072 (all comparisons P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Irrespective of underlying ILD type, patients with progressive fibrosing ILD had significantly increased HCRU and cost relative to those whose fibrosing ILD had not yet progressed.

Pan-cancer assessment of antineoplastic therapy-induced interstitial lung disease in patients receiving subsequent therapy immediately following immune checkpoint blockade therapy.

BACKGROUND: Drug-induced interstitial lung disease (DIILD) is a serious adverse event potentially induced by any antineoplastic agent. Whether cancer patients are predisposed to a higher risk of DIILD after receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is unknown. METHODS: This study retrospectively assessed the cumulative incidence of DIILD in consecutive cancer patients who received post-ICI antineoplastic treatment within 6 months from the final dose of ICIs. There was also a separate control cohort of 55 ICI-naïve patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received docetaxel. RESULTS: Of 552 patients who received ICIs, 186 met the inclusion criteria. The cohort predominantly comprised patients with cancer of the lung, kidney/urinary tract, or gastrointestinal tract. The cumulative incidence of DIILD in the entire cohort at 3 and 6 months was 4.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.4%-8.7%) and 7.2% (95% CI 4.0%-11.5%), respectively. There were significant differences according to cancer type (Gray's test, P = .04), with the highest cumulative incidence of DIILD in patients with lung cancer being 9.8% (95% CI 4.3%-18.0%) at 3 months and 14.2% (95% CI 7.3%-23.3%) at 6 months. DIILD was caused by docetaxel in six of these 11 lung cancer patients (54.5%). After matching, the cumulative incidence of docetaxel-induced ILD in patients with NSCLC in the post-ICI setting was higher than that in the ICI-naïve setting: 13.0% (95% CI 3.3%-29.7%) vs 4.3% (95% CI 0.3%-18.2%) at 3 months; and 21.7% (95% CI 7.9%-39.9%) vs 4.3% (95% CI 0.3%-18.2%) at 6 months. However, these were not significant differences (hazard ratio, 5.37; 95% CI 0.64-45.33; Fine-Gray P = .12). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with lung cancer were at high risk of developing DIILD in subsequent regimens after ICI treatment. Whether NSCLC patients are predisposed to additional risk of docetaxel-induced ILD by prior ICIs warrants further study.

Prognostic value of automated assessment of interstitial lung disease on CT in systemic sclerosis.

OBJECTIVE: Stratifying the risk of death in SSc-related interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) is a challenging issue. The extent of lung fibrosis on high-resolution CT (HRCT) is often assessed by a visual semiquantitative method that lacks reliability. We aimed to assess the potential prognostic value of a deep-learning-based algorithm enabling automated quantification of ILD on HRCT in patients with SSc. METHODS: We correlated the extent of ILD with the occurrence of death during follow-up, and evaluated the additional value of ILD extent in predicting death based on a prognostic model including well-known risk factors in SSc. RESULTS: We included 318 patients with SSc, among whom 196 had ILD; the median follow-up was 94 months (interquartile range 73-111). The mortality rate was 1.6% at 2 years and 26.3% at 10 years. For each 1% increase in the baseline ILD extent (up to 30% of the lung), the risk of death at 10 years was increased by 4% (hazard ratio 1.04, 95% CI 1.01, 1.07, P = 0.004). We constructed a risk prediction model that showed good discrimination for 10-year mortality (c index 0.789). Adding the automated quantification of ILD significantly improved the model for 10-year survival prediction (P = 0.007). Its discrimination was only marginally improved, but it improved prediction of 2-year mortality (difference in time-dependent area under the curve 0.043, 95% CI 0.002, 0.084, P = 0.040). CONCLUSION: The deep-learning-based, computer-aided quantification of ILD extent on HRCT provides an effective tool for risk stratification in SSc. It might help identify patients at short-term risk of death.

Interstitial lung disease hospitalizations, outcomes, and costs in the United States from 2008 to 2018.

BACKGROUND: Interstitial lung diseases (ILD) are associated with frequent hospitalizations, however, limited studies have evaluated the hospitalization rates and outcomes. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We extracted hospitalization data for ILD patients using the National Inpatient Sample Database. Regression models were used to assess trends in hospitalizations and outcomes. RESULTS: There were 345,063 hospitalizations with a principal diagnosis of ILD from 2008 to 2018. Hospitalization rates were higher in females, older age groups, and those living in rural areas. Rates were lower in those with income levels at or above the median and in the western U.S. Of those hospitalized, 5.1 % died, and ∼37 % required skilled nursing facility/home health. Deaths were lower among females and in those with Medicaid and private insurance. Rates were higher in the older age groups, those with median and above income levels, and those living in medium/small metro and rural areas. The overall hospitalization rate decreased by ∼23 % during this period. The percentage of deaths remained stable (except in rural hospitals) during this period. The average length of stay (LOS) was 5.5 days. The average hospital cost was $10,438 which increased by ∼38 %. INTERPRETATION: Hospitalizations for ILD have been decreasing, however, the death percentage has been stable. The LOS has remained stable, but hospital costs have been increasing. We identified differences in ILD hospitalization rates and outcomes/costs based on patient and hospital characteristics. Identifying the causes for these differences would be important in reducing health disparities in ILD patients. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: n/a.

Burden of Disease and Productivity Loss in the European Economic Area in Patients Affected by Fibrosing Interstitial Lung Disease.

INTRODUCTION: Progression of fibrosis in interstitial lung diseases (ILD) has been associated with poor prognosis, lower quality of life for patients and caregivers, and higher healthcare costs. This study estimated the burden of disease and productivity loss of progressively fibrosing ILD, focusing on progressive pulmonary fibrosis other than idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (non-IPF PPF) and systemic sclerosis-associated ILD (SSc-ILD) in the European Economic Area (EEA). METHODS: An economic model was built to estimate the clinical burden of SSc-ILD and non-IPF PPF. The model was based on published data on disease prevalence and disease burden (in terms of comorbidities, exacerbations, and deaths) as well as on productivity loss (in terms of sick days, early retirement, permanent disability, and job loss). Aggregate income loss was obtained by multiplying productivity loss by the median daily income in each country/area of investigation. A sensitivity analysis was performed to test the impact of the variability of the model assumptions. RESULTS: In the whole EEA, a total of 86,794 and 13,221 individuals were estimated to be affected by non-IPF PPF and SSc-ILD, respectively. Estimated annual sick days associated with the diseases were 3,952,604 and 672,172, early retirements were 23,174 and 5341, permanently disabled patients were 41,748 and 4037, and job losses were 19,789 and 2617 for non-IPF PPF and SSc-ILD, respectively. Annual exacerbations were estimated to be 22,401-31,181 and 1259-1753, while deaths were 5791-6171 and 572-638 in non-IPF PPF and SSc-ILD, respectively. The estimated annual aggregate income loss in EEA, accounting for losses due to annual sick days, early retirements, and permanently disabled patients, was €1433 million and €220 million in non-IPF PPF and SSc-ILD, respectively. The productivity loss due to job losses was €194 million and €26 million in non-IPF PPF and SSc-ILD, respectively. The main driver of aggregate income loss variability was the prevalence. CONCLUSION: The impact of non-IPF PPF and SSc-ILD on society is definitely non-negligible. Actions to reduce the burden on our societies are highly needed.

Interstitial lung disease in rheumatoid arthritis: incidence, prevalence and related drug prescriptions between 2007 and 2020.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate prevalence, incidence and medication of interstitial lung disease (ILD) among German individuals with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Nationwide BARMER claims data from 2007 to 2020 were used. RA-ILD was identified by diagnosis codes, prescription of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and lung diagnostics. ILD was assigned as incident or prevalent relative to the year of the first diagnosis. We identified prescriptions of glucocorticoids, conventional synthetic (cs), biological (b) and targeted synthetic (ts)DMARDs, antifibrotics and rheumatology and/or pulmonology care. RESULTS: Among all persons with RA (40 686 in 2007 to 85 175 in 2020), 1.7%-2.2%/year had ILD with a slight decline since 2013. Incident ILD was 0.13%-0.21% per year and remained stable over time. ILD was more common in seropositive RA, in men and in the elderly (mean age 72 years in 2020). Glucocorticoids (84% to 68%), csDMARD (83% to 55%) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use (62% to 38%) declined, while bDMARDs (16% to 24%) rose. In 2020, 7% received tsDMARDs, 3% antifibrotics, 44% analgesics and 30% opioids. DMARD therapy was more common if a rheumatologist was involved and antifibrotics if a pulmonologist was involved. Opioid use was highest if no specialist was involved (39%) but also common in rheumatology care (32%) and less frequent in pulmonology care (21%). CONCLUSIONS: RA-ILD is rare and mainly affects elderly persons. No trend in incidence was observed but treatment strategies have enlarged. Specialist care is necessary to provide disease-specific therapies. The continuing high analgesic and opioid demand shows unmet needs in these patients.

Clinical assessment for pulmonary hypertension in interstitial lung disease.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is an important complication of interstitial lung disease (ILD), as its development confers a poor prognosis. There are no specific recommendations for methods of assessment for PH in ILD populations. AIMS: To determine current assessment practices for PH in an Australian ILD centre. METHODS: In the Austin Health ILD database, 162 consecutive patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis or connective tissue disease-associated ILD were identified and retrospectively evaluated for methods of PH assessment with transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), serum N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and right heart catheterisation (RHC) in relation to patient demographic and physiological parameters. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 30 (14.4-56.4) months. At baseline, vital capacity was 80.0 ± 18.4% predicted, and diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide was 59.6 ± 15.2% predicted. Evaluation for PH was performed in 147 (90.7%) patients, among whom 105 (64.8%) had TTE performed at least once. At the initial TTE, 33.7% patients had high probability of PH, defined as RVSP >40 mmHg + RAp and/or right ventricular dysfunction. At the time of the most recent TTE, these criteria were met in 45 (52.3%) patients. Elevated serum NT-proBNP levels during the first year were observed in 47 (38.8%) patients. Only 14 (8.6%) patients had RHC. CONCLUSION: Our institutional PH assessment practice in ILD demonstrates a substantial prevalence of probable PH at baseline. As new therapies emerge for the treatment of PH in ILD, well-defined screening practices are important in this population for early identification and optimal management.

Incidence and appropriate management of drug-induced interstitial lung disease in Japanese patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer: A multicenter retrospective study.

AIM: Drug-induced interstitial lung disease (DI-ILD) is a serious adverse event during chemotherapy. This study aimed to obtain real-world data of the incidence, clinical characteristics, predictive factors, and prognosis of patients with pancreatic cancer who developed DI-ILD. METHODS: In patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer who underwent standard chemotherapy at our hospital and its participating facilities between April 2014 and March 2019, the clinical features, occurrence rate and clinical course of DI-ILD, and prognosis were retrospectively evaluated. RESULTS: Altogether, 390 patients were finally enrolled. DI-ILD occurred in 24 cases (6.2%). The median period from diagnosis of pancreatic cancer to the onset of DI-ILD was 2.2 months (.6-13.3 months). The rate of DI-ILD onset according to each regimen was 5.8% of gemcitabine (GEM) plus albumin-bound paclitaxel therapy (18/308), 3.8% of GEM (4/106), and 2.3% of FOLFIRINOX (2/88). The incidence of DI-ILD in GEM-based regimens was significantly higher than that in non-GEM-based regimens (p < .01). The median overall survival (OS) of the patients with and without DI-ILD after propensity score matching was 11.5 months and 11.4 months (p = .99), respectively. After the resolution of DI-ILD, no statistical significance in the median OS of the patients with and without subsequent treatment (11.0 vs. 6.8 months, p = .18) was observed. CONCLUSION: DI-ILD is not a rare adverse event in the current standard chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer in Japan. With appropriate management of DI-ILD, the prognosis of patients with DI-ILD can be equivalent to that of patients without DI-ILD.

SER-SEPAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis-related interstitial lung disease. Part 1: Epidemiology, risk factors and prognosis.

OBJECTIVE: To develop multidisciplinary recommendations to improve the management of rheumatoid arthritis-related interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD). METHODS: Clinical research questions relevant to the objective of the document were identified by a panel of rheumatologists and pneumologists selected based on their experience in the field. Systematic reviews of the available evidence were conducted, and evidence was graded according to the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) criteria. Specific recommendations were made. RESULTS: Six PICO questions were selected, three of which analysed the incidence and prevalence of RA-ILD, associated risk factors, and predictors of progression and mortality. A total of 6 specific recommendations on these topics, structured by question, were formulated based on the evidence found and/or expert consensus. CONCLUSIONS: We present the first official SER-SEPAR document with specific recommendations for RA-ILD management developed to resolve some common clinical questions and facilitate decision-making for patients.

Economic burden of interstitial lung disease in a commercially insured population with Sjögren syndrome in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Patients with Sjögren syndrome (SjS) have substantial cost burden on the health care system; among these patients, those who develop interstitial lung disease (ILD) experience poorer quality of life and have a higher mortality risk. However, the economic burden of ILD has not been documented. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the direct health care costs associated with ILD among patients with SjS in a representative sample of the commercially insured population in the United States. METHODS: Individuals with a diagnosis of SjS between January 1, 2006, and September 30, 2015, with and without a diagnosis of ILD, were identified from the PharMetrics Plus for Academics database. The index date was defined as the later date of the first claim with a diagnosis of SjS or the first claim with a diagnosis of ILD for individuals with SjS and ILD (SjS-ILD), and the first claim with a diagnosis of SjS for SjS-only controls. All baseline variables were measured in the 180 days preindex period. A 5:1 propensity score matching was applied to controls for baseline demographic and geographic variables. The cost ratio and average marginal effect for total direct medical costs comparing SjS patients with and without ILD were estimated using a generalized linear model. Costs per health care resource utilization category were also reported. All costs were represented from a health plan payer perspective and inflated to 2020 US dollars. RESULTS: After applying the inclusion criteria, 815 SjS-ILD cases were identified and matched to 4,075 SjS-only controls based on the 5:1 propensity score matching procedure. The 180-day total cost of SjS-ILD cases was about 2 times higher compared with that of SjS-only controls (adjusted cost ratio = 1.95; 95% CI = 1.76-2.15). The average difference in total cost between patients with and without ILD was $8,814 (95% CI = $7,149-$10,479). Costs were mainly contributed from outpatient services other than physician office visit (such as radiological and pathological tests), inpatient services, and outpatient pharmacy cost components for both groups (39.4%, 38.8%, and 16.3% for SjS-ILD cases; 43.7%, 22.6%, and 22.9% for SjS-only controls, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Total direct health care cost was substantially higher in patients with SjS and ILD compared with patients with SjS without ILD. Our findings provide the foundation for further economic evaluation for preventive strategies to reduce the clinical and economic burden imposed by ILD among patients with SjS.

Direct and indirect costs of systemic sclerosis and associated interstitial lung disease: A nationwide population-based cohort study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to evaluate the direct and indirect costs of systemic sclerosis (SSc) in cases with and without interstitial lung disease (ILD). METHODS: Cases diagnosed with SSc (2002-2015) were identified in the Danish National Patient Registry. Cases were matched 1:4 with non-SSc controls from the general population. Data on costs were obtained from national databases. Excess cost was estimated as the annual cost per case subtracting the costs of the control. RESULTS: We identified 1869 cases and 7463 controls. Total excess cost (direct healthcare, elderly care and indirect costs) in the SSc-ILD cohort was €29,725, and €17,905 in the non-ILD SSc cohort. In- and out-patient contacts and forgone earnings were the key drivers of costs in both cohorts. Healthcare costs were higher before and after the diagnosis compared with the controls. Men incurred higher excess healthcare costs than women. Hospitalization and outpatient services were the key drivers of the gender-associated differences. Income from employment decreased more rapidly after diagnosis in the SSc-ILD cohort than in the non-ILD SSc cohort. Public transfer income increased after diagnosis, with the most pronounced difference in the SSc-ILD cohort. Disability pension was the key driver of public transfer income. CONCLUSION: SSc is associated with a significant individual and societal burden that is evident several years before and after the diagnosis. Total excess costs are higher in SSc-ILD than in the non-ILD SSc underlining the severity of pulmonary involvement. Initiatives to maintain work ability and to reduce hospital admissions may reduce the economic burden of SSc.

Validation of an algorithm to identify incident interstitial lung disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is an important problem for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, current approaches to ILD case finding in real-world data have been evaluated only in limited settings and identify only prevalent ILD and not new-onset disease. Our objective was to develop, refine, and validate a claims-based algorithm to identify both prevalent and incident ILD in RA patients compared to the gold standard of medical record review. METHODS: We used administrative claims data 2006-2015 from Medicare to derive a cohort of RA patients. We then identified suspected ILD using variations of ILD algorithms to classify both prevalent and incident ILD based on features of the data that included hospitalization vs. outpatient setting, physician specialty, pulmonary-related diagnosis codes, and exclusions for potentially mimicking pulmonary conditions. Positive predictive values (PPV) of several ILD algorithm variants for both prevalent and incident ILD were evaluated. RESULTS: We identified 234 linkable RA patients with sufficient data to evaluate for ILD. Overall, 108 (46.2%) of suspected cases were confirmed as ILD. Most cases (64%) were diagnosed in the outpatient setting. The best performing algorithm for prevalent ILD had a PPV of 77% (95% CI 67-84%) and for incident ILD was 96% (95% CI 85-100%). CONCLUSION: Case finding in administrative data for both prevalent and incident interstitial lung disease in RA patients is feasible and has reasonable accuracy to support population-based research and real-world evidence generation.

Global and regional burden of interstitial lung disease and pulmonary sarcoidosis from 1990 to 2019: results from the Global Burden of Disease study 2019.

BACKGROUND: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) and pulmonary sarcoidosis are common respiratory diseases with a heterogeneous distribution worldwide. The global burden and temporal trends of ILD and sarcoidosis are rarely explored. METHODS: Using the classification 'ILD and pulmonary sarcoidosis' from the Global Burden of Disease 2019 dataset, we described the age-standardised rates of incidence, mortality, disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs), and their average annual percentage change from 1990 to 2019 by sex, Sociodemographic Index (SDI) and region. RESULTS: In 2019, the global incidence and mortality of ILD and pulmonary sarcoidosis were 24.2 million and 169 833 cases, respectively. From 1990 to 2019, the global incidence, deaths and DALYs due to ILD and pulmonary sarcoidosis increased by 118.6%, 166.63% and 122.87% respectively. The global incidence of ILD and pulmonary sarcoidosis was higher in men and was mainly concentrated among persons aged 70‒79 of both sexes. Significant regional differences could be seen in the disease burden of ILD and pulmonary sarcoidosis: since 2006, high-SDI regions had higher age-standardised incidence rates but lower age-standardised death rates compared with the low-SDI regions. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests the incidence, mortality and DALYs from ILD and pulmonary sarcoidosis are increasing globally. To reduce the ongoing burden of this condition, early diagnosis and treatment are vital, and more targeted and specific strategies should be established in high-burden regions. Differences in incidence and mortality across regions may reflect the influence of genetic, environmental, diagnostic, pharmacotherapeutic, and health system factors.

Cost drivers in the pharmacological treatment of interstitial lung disease.

INTRODUCTION: Treatments of interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) mainly focus on disease stabilization and relief of symptoms by managing inflammation or suppressing fibrosis by (in part costly) drugs. To highlight economic burden of drug treatment in different ILD-subtypes we assessed cost trends and therewith-associated drivers. METHODS: Using data from the German, observational HILDA study we estimated adjusted mean medication costs over 36-month intervals using one- and two-part Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE) regression models with a gamma distribution and log link. Next, we determined factors associated with costs. RESULTS: In Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) mean per capita medication costs increased from €1442 before to €11,000€ at the end of study. In non-IPF subtypes, the increase took place at much lower level. Mean per capita ILD-specific medication costs at the end of the study ranged between €487 (other ILD) and €9142 (IPF). At baseline, higher FVC %predicted values were associated with lower medication costs in IPF (-9%) and sarcoidosis (-1%). During follow up higher comorbidity burden escalated costs in progressive fibrosing ILD (PF-ILD) (+52%), sarcoidosis (+60%) and other ILDs (+24%). The effect of disease duration was not uniform, with cost savings in PF-ILD (-8%) and sarcoidosis (-6%), but increased spending in IPF (+11%). CONCLUSION: Pharmacological management of ILD, in particular of IPF imposes a substantial economic burden on the healthcare system. Strategies to reduce comorbidity burden and early treatment may reduce the impact of ILDs on the healthcare system.

Estimates of epidemiology, mortality and disease burden associated with progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease in France (the PROGRESS study).

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of data on the epidemiology, survival estimates and healthcare resource utilisation and associated costs of patients with progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease (PF-ILD) in France. An algorithm for extracting claims data was developed to indirectly identify and describe patients with PF-ILD in the French national administrative healthcare database. METHODS: The French healthcare database, the Système National des Données de Santé (SNDS), includes data related to ambulatory care, hospitalisations and death for 98.8% of the population. In this study, algorithms based on age, diagnosis and healthcare consumption were created to identify adult patients with PF-ILD other than idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis between 2010 and 2017. Incidence, prevalence, survival estimates, clinical features and healthcare resource usage and costs were described among patients with PF-ILD. RESULTS: We identified a total of 14,413 patients with PF-ILD. Almost half of them (48.1%) were female and the mean (± standard deviation) age was 68.4 (± 15.0) years. Between 2010 and 2017, the estimated incidence of PF-ILD ranged from 4.0 to 4.7/100,000 person-years and the estimated prevalence from 6.6 to 19.4/100,000 persons. The main diagnostic categories represented were exposure-related ILD other than hypersensitivity pneumonitis (n = 3486; 24.2%), idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (n = 3113; 21.6%) and rheumatoid arthritis-associated ILD (n = 2521; 17.5%). Median overall survival using Kaplan-Meier estimation was 3.7 years from the start of progression. During the study, 95.2% of patients had ≥ 1 hospitalisation for respiratory care and 34.3% were hospitalised in an intensive care unit. The median (interquartile range) total specific cost per patient during the follow-up period was €25,613 (10,622-54,287) and the median annual cost per patient was €18,362 (6856-52,026), of which €11,784 (3003-42,097) was related to hospitalisations. Limitations included the retrospective design and identification of cases through an algorithm in the absence of chest high-resolution computed tomography scans and pulmonary function tests. CONCLUSIONS: This large, real-world, longitudinal study provides important insights into the characteristics, epidemiology and healthcare resource utilisation and costs associated with PF-ILD in France using a comprehensive and exhaustive database, and provides vital evidence that PF-ILD represents a high burden on both patients and healthcare services. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03858842. ISRCTN, ISRCTN12345678. Registered 3 January 2019-Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03858842.

Economic Burden and Management of Systemic Sclerosis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease in 8 European Countries: The BUILDup Delphi Consensus Study.

INTRODUCTION: Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare chronic autoimmune disease characterised by microvascular damage, immune dysregulation and fibrosis, affecting the skin, joints and internal organs. Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is frequently associated with systemic sclerosis (SSc-ILD), leading to a poor prognosis and a high mortality rate. The aim of the BUILDup study (BUrden of Interstitial Lung Disease Consensus Panel) was to investigate the overall disease management and to estimate the social and economic burden of SSc-ILD across 8 European countries. METHODS: A modified Delphi method was used to obtain information on the management of SSc-ILD patients among 40 specialists (panellists) from 8 European countries. Average annual costs per patient and country were estimated by means of a direct cost-analysis study. RESULTS: The panellists had managed 805 SSc-ILD patients in the last year, 39.1% with limited (L-SSc-ILD) and 60.9% with extensive (E-SSc-ILD) disease. Of these, 32.8% of the panellists started treatment at diagnosis, 42.3% after signs of deterioration/progression and 24.7% when the disease had become extensive. The average annual cost of SSc-ILD per patient ranged from €6191 in Greece to €25,354 in Sweden. Main cost drivers were follow-up procedures, accounting for 80% of the total annual costs. Hospitalisations were the most important cost driver of follow-up costs. Healthcare resource use was more important for E-SSc-ILD compared to L-SSc-ILD. Early retirement was taken by 40.4% of the patients with an average of 11.9 years before the statutory retirement age. CONCLUSIONS: SSc-ILD entails not only a clinical but also a social and economic burden, and is higher for E-SSc-ILD.

Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors and interstitial lung disease in the FDA adverse event reporting system: a pharmacovigilance assessment.

PURPOSE: We assessed pulmonary toxicity of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)4/6 inhibitors by analyzing the publicly available FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). METHODS: Reports of interstitial lung disease (ILD) were characterized in terms of demographic information, including daily dose, latency, concomitant drugs known to be associated with ILD, and causality assessment (adapted WHO system). Disproportionality analyses were carried out by calculating reporting odds ratios (RORs) with 95% confidence interval (CI), accounting for major confounders, including notoriety and competition biases. RESULTS: ILD reports (N = 161) represented 2.1% and 0.3% of all reports for abemaciclib and palbocilcib/ribociclib, respectively, with negligible proportion of concomitant pneumotoxic drugs. Increased reporting was found for CDK4/6 inhibitors when compared to other drugs (ROR = 1.50; 95%CI = 1.28-1.74), and abemaciclib vs other anticancer agents (4.70; 3.62-5.98). Sensitivity analyses confirmed a strong and consistent disproportionality for abemaciclib. Higher-than-expected reporting emerged for palbociclib (1.38; 1.07-1.77) and ribociclib (2.39; 1.34-3.92) only when removing Japan reports. ILD occurred at recommended daily doses, with median latency ranging from 50 (abemaciclib) to 253 (ribociclib) days. Causality was highly probable in 55% of abemaciclib cases, probable in 68% of palbociclib cases. CONCLUSIONS: Increased reporting of ILD with CDK4/6 inhibitors calls for further comparative population-based studies to characterize and quantify the actual risk, taking into account drug- and patient-related risk factors. These findings strengthen the role of (a) timely pharmacovigilance to detect post-marketing signals through FAERS and other real-world data, (b) clinicians to assess early, on a case-by-case basis, the potential responsibility of CDK4/6 inhibitors when diagnosing a lung injury.

Rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease: an overview of epidemiology, pathogenesis and management.

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) accounts for the major cause of morbidity and mortality in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, little is known of the pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of RA-associated ILD. In this review, we describe our present understanding and ongoing research in RA-ILD. Its aetiology does appear to associate with anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies, MUC5B mutation and smoking. Another focus of this article is on recent diagnostic methods in RA-ILD. Compared with other methods, high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) imaging is a main method for the evaluation of ILD in RA patients. Pulmonary function is better suited for assessing progression. An important topic relates to therapeutic intervention. Disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in RA lack strong evidence in the onset or worsening of ILD. The available literature support that methotrexate, leflunomide, abatacept and rituximab play beneficial roles in the prevention and treatment of RA-ILD.