Educational aspects of rare and orphan lung diseases.

People with rare lung diseases often suffer the burden of delayed diagnosis, limited treatment options, and difficulties in finding expert physicians. One of the reasons for the delay in diagnosis is the limited training for healthcare practitioners on rare diseases. This review explores the main concerns and needs for education on rare lung diseases from the perspectives of both patients and professionals. Despite the increasing interest in rare lung disorders and some recent breakthrough developments on the management of several diseases, healthcare professionals, including general practitioners and hospital workers, receive little education on this topic. Nonetheless, many healthcare professionals show much interest in receiving further training, especially on diagnosis. Patients and families want easier access to high-quality education materials to help them manage their own disease. Well-educated patients are better equipped to deal with chronic diseases, but patient education can be challenging as patients' individual health issues, and diverse backgrounds can create significant barriers. Raising more awareness for rare lung diseases and further development of patient-centred international expert networks like the European Reference Network on Rare Lung Diseases (ERN-LUNG), which includes both experts and patient representatives, are essential for improving care and education on rare lung diseases. Initiatives such as the Rare Disease Day, have been successful in increasing awareness for rare conditions. The development of online tools for accessing information has had positive effects and should be further supported and extended in the future.

Dietary patterns, cost and compliance with low-protein diet of phenylketonuria and other inherited metabolic diseases.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Phenylketonuria (PKU) and several other inherited metabolic diseases (IMD) require a lifelong low-protein diet (LPD), otherwise they lead to many health complications. LPDs, however, carry a significant economic burden for patients and their families. The objective of this study was to explore the costs of low-protein foods (LPFs) necessary for LPD as well as dietary patterns and compliance towards an LPD. SUBJECTS/METHODS: A detailed questionnaire was created in cooperation with National Association of PKU and other IMD (NSPKU), and consequently sent to all NSPKU members treated with an LPD (n=303). A total of 184 respondents from the Czech Republic were included in the study (174 had PKU, 10 had other IMD). RESULTS: The average daily consumption of LPF was equal to 411.7 g (PKU) and 345.6 g (other IMD), which corresponds to energy value of 5558 kJ and 4438 kJ, respectively, per patient per day. Patients mostly consumed low-protein flour (≈30% of energy intake), pasta (≈18%), basic pastry (≈15%) and sweets (≈10%). The average monthly costs of LPDs were equal to [euro ]130 (PKU) and [euro ]129 (other IMD) per patient per month. The compliance with LPD was decreasing with increasing age (P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest study examining costs and dietary patterns of LPDs in patients with PKU and the first study of this kind in other IMD patients requiring an LPD. The study clearly showed that an LPD carries a very high economic burden for families, which may lead to less LPD compliance and potential severe health consequences.

Economic Evaluation in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: Model Frameworks for Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Several treatments are on the horizon for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), a terminal orphan disease. In many jurisdictions, decisions regarding pricing and reimbursement of these health technologies comprise evidence of value for money. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to develop a cost-effectiveness model based on the Duchenne muscular dystrophy Functional Ability Self-Assessment Tool (DMDSAT), a new rating scale created specifically to measure disease progression in clinical practice and trials and model DMD in economic evaluations, and compare it with two alternative model structures. METHODS: We constructed three Markov cohort state-transition models to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a hypothetical intervention for DMD versus standard of care in a UK setting. Model I was based on the DMDSAT, model II on stages of disease as defined in the DMD clinical care guidelines and model III on patients' ventilation status. The conceptual model structures were formulated in collaboration with three DMD experts. RESULTS: All three models were judged to have good validity with regards to the appropriateness of the choice of modelling technique, conceptual representation of the disease, model input data and model outcomes. Across frameworks, lifetime direct medical costs with standard of care ranged between £217,510 and £284,640, total costs between £624,240 and £713,840, and total number of quality-adjusted life-years between 5.96 and 7.17. CONCLUSIONS: We present a first version of a model for the economic evaluation of treatments for DMD based on the DMDSAT, as well as two alternative frameworks encompassing conventional staging of disease progression. Our findings should be helpful to inform health technology assessments and health economic programmes of future treatments for DMD.

Primary Biliary Cholangitis: Medical and Specialty Pharmacy Management Update.

BACKGROUND: Chronic liver disease and cirrhosis are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States. Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), previously known as primary biliary cirrhosis and which has been designated an orphan condition, is a chronic autoimmune disease resulting in the destruction of the small bile ducts in the liver. Without effective treatment, disease progression frequently leads to liver failure and death. Until May 2016, the only FDA-approved treatment for PBC was ursodiol (UDCA), an oral hydrophilic bile acid, which can slow progression of liver damage due to PBC. However, 1 out of 3 patients taking UDCA has an inadequate biochemical response, leading to increased risk of disease progression, liver transplantation, and mortality. Given this unmet clinical need, new therapies are in development for the treatment of PBC. To provide pharmacists with an overview of the latest research on the pathophysiology of PBC and potential new treatment options and to highlight medical and specialty pharmacy approaches to managing access to drugs to treat orphan diseases such as PBC, a 2-hour satellite symposium was presented in conjunction with the 2015 Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy (AMCP) Nexus meeting. Although obeticholic acid was approved by the FDA for the treatment of PBC in May 2016, this development occurred after the symposium presentation. The symposium was supported by an independent educational grant from Intercept Pharmaceuticals and was managed by Analysis Group. Robert Navarro, PharmD, moderated the CPE-accredited symposium titled "Medical and Specialty Pharmacy Management Update on Primary Biliary Cirrhosis." Expert panelists included Christopher L. Bowlus, MD; James T. Kenney, RPh, MBA; and Gary Rice, RPh, MS, MBA, CSP. OBJECTIVE: To summarize the educational satellite symposium presentations and discussions. SUMMARY: Autoimmune liver diseases, including PBC, are responsible for 15% of all liver transplants performed and an equal percentage of deaths related to liver disease. UDCA is the only FDA-approved therapy for treatment of PBC and is considered the standard of care. Nevertheless, many patients do not respond to UDCA, creating the need for new therapeutic options to improve clinical outcomes for PBC patients with inadequate response to treatment. While several agents are being studied in combination with UDCA, monotherapy with the novel agent obeticholic acid, a farnesoid X receptor agonist, has also shown promising results. Health plans are anticipated to assign any newly introduced therapy for the treatment of PBC to specialty pharmacy given its orphan disease status. This assignment enables the health plan to receive disease education, which is particularly important when new drugs are indicated for orphan diseases, and assistance with designing appropriate prior authorization criteria. The clinical value of any new therapeutic options that will inform formulary decisions and prior authorization criteria will be assessed based on evidence of efficacy, safety, and tolerability, among other factors, such as the potential to reduce or delay medical resource utilization (e.g., liver transplant). Key considerations for prior authorization of a new therapy will be determining which PBC patients are appropriate candidates for the new therapy and developing criteria for that determination. These are likely to include clinical diagnostic criteria and degree of response to prior treatment with UDCA. Initially, any new therapy would likely be positioned as noncovered until appropriate prior authorization criteria are established. CONCLUSIONS: PBC is a chronic liver disease with significant morbidity and mortality, as well as a significant burden on the health care system if the disease progresses to the point at which a liver transplant is needed. Although UDCA, the current standard of care, has improved outcomes for many patients, others have an inadequate response to this treatment. This symposium discussed these issues and also addressed the overall treatment paradigm for orphan drug therapies, key implications for patient management, and the role of specialty pharmacy management and any associated needs both in general and specifically for new therapeutic options for PBC.

Innovation by patients with rare diseases and chronic needs.

UNLABELLED: We provide the first empirical exploration of disease-related innovation by patients and their caregivers. Our aims were to explore to what degree do patients develop innovative solutions; how many of these are unique developments; and do these solutions have positive perceived impact on the patients' overall quality of life? In addition, we explored the factors associated with patient innovation development, and sharing of the solutions that the patients developed. METHODS: We administered a questionnaire via telephone interviewing to a sample of 500 rare disease patients and caregivers. The solutions reported were pre-screened by the authors for their fit with the self-developed innovation aim of the study. All the reported solutions were then validated for their novelty by two medical professionals. Logistic regression models were used to test the relationships between our key variables, patient innovation and solution sharing. RESULTS: 263 (53%) of our survey respondents reported developing and using a solution to improve management of their diseases. An initial screening removed 81 (16%) solutions for being an obvious misfit to the self-developed innovation aim of the study. This lowered the sample of potentially innovative solutions to 182 (36%). Assessment of novelty and usefulness of the solutions, conducted by two medical evaluators, confirmed that 40 solutions (8%) were indeed novel, while the remaining 142 (28%) were already known to medicine. The likelihood of patient innovation increased as the education level increased (OR 2, p < 0.05), and as their perception of limitations imposed by their disease increased (OR 1.3, p < 0.05). 55 individuals diffused their solutions to some degree, with 50 of these sharing via direct diffusion to other patients. There is a positive relationship between the impact of a solution on the respondents' overall quality of life and likelihood of solution sharing. CONCLUSIONS: Given that hundreds of millions of people worldwide are afflicted by rare diseases, patient and their caregivers can be a tremendous source of innovation for many who are similarly afflicted. Our findings suggest that many patients could be greatly assisted by improved diffusion of known solutions and best practices to and among patients and their caregivers.

The pooling of manpower and resources through the establishment of European reference networks and rare disease patient registries is a necessary area of collaboration for rare renal disorders.

This review aims to provide guidance on emerging concepts and policy related to European reference networks (ERNs) for rare diseases (RDs) and the development and management of RD patient registries. A major problem facing many RDs including rare renal disorders is that patients do not have a specialist centre that they can attend where clinicians, working as a multidisciplinary team, are experts in the particular disease. Furthermore, for most RDs, no single centre, and in many cases no single country, has sufficient numbers of patients and resources to fully understand the natural history or to conduct clinical and translational research. Therefore, the pooling of manpower and resources through the establishment of ERN and RD patient registries is a common and necessary area of collaboration. The concept of European networks for RDs dates back to the early 2000s and the Commission launch of a call for European pilot reference networks for RDs. These networks of expert centres have been brought together through the desire for further knowledge and innovation in RD areas. Networks demand a holistic approach and long-term vision with close collaboration between clinicians, diagnostic laboratories, scientists, patients and their families. The development of legal measures for ERNs is in progress at the Commission and these networks will be a shared responsibility of the Commission and member states. In the context of ERNs, an essential activity is the patient registries. Patient registries are organized databases where patient information, including demographic, medical and family history, are collected, stored and available for retrieval via standardized and secure methods. Patient registries are increasingly recognized as crucial tools for RD research for which international collaboration is absolutely essential to understand the pathogenesis of rare genotypes, achieve a unified collection of phenotypic data, foster natural history studies providing the foundation for successful orphan drug development, facilitate studies to identify appropriate clinical endpoints or biomarkers, identify participants for research and clinical trials and support discussions with regulators including the safety and efficacy evaluation of potential therapies. Furthermore, patient registries are often used as part of regulatory decisions and post-marketing surveillance requirements. Data can be entered into a registry by patients, clinicians, researchers or directly imported from patient's health records. The major concern in maintaining the dynamic of these networks and registries is sustainability, as the infrastructures and coordination have a cost.

Multidisciplinary approach to R&D in vitiligo, a neglected skin disease.

A global interest in therapies for neglected diseases is rising, but traditional biopharma research and development (R&D) process is prohibitively expensive to justify cost of their development. Vitiligo is a multifactorial orphan disease that affects at minimum 35 million people worldwide, yet no therapeutic solutions exist. The present authors describe a budget-minded pursuit of the new therapy development for vitiligo, which includes a multidiscipline collaboration and effective bridging between academic research, biobanking, and bioinformatics. The present authors anticipate that the present authors' "theoretically induced and empirically guided" discovery process will enable development of more leads, with a much greater probability of success and under tighter budgets compared with those of the biopharma company. Ultimately, the multidisciplinary approach described below facilitates the collaborative development of personalized treatments for different patient subpopulations in vitiligo and other neglected diseases.

Opportunities in systems biology to discover mechanisms and repurpose drugs for CNS diseases.

Therapies for central nervous system (CNS) diseases remain an unmet medical need. This is largely due to multiple unknown disease-modifying genes and pathways. Systems biology through network modeling has shown promise in discovering novel therapeutic targets, deciphering disease mechanisms, and suggesting drug repurposing opportunities. In this article we cover current progress in systems biology and its role, applications, and challenges in the pharmaceutical industry. We also outline a practical strategy to infer drug repositioning candidates for rare CNS diseases by describing Multiple Level Network Modeling (MLNM) analysis.

Accelerating access to treatments for rare diseases.

Changes in regulatory policy and legislative incentives to promote the development of drugs for rare diseases - orphan drugs - have led to increases in the number of orphan drug designations, but the rate of such products reaching the market remains frustratingly flat. This article highlights areas in which novel approaches could facilitate regulatory approval and access to treatments for rare diseases.

Rare diseases, orphan drugs and their regulation: questions and misconceptions.

Sustained advocacy efforts driven by patients' organizations to make rare diseases a health priority have led to regulatory and economic incentives for industry to develop drugs for these diseases, known as orphan drugs. These incentives, enacted in regulations first introduced in the United States in 1983 and later in Japan, Europe and elsewhere, have resulted in substantial improvements in the treatment for patients with a range of rare diseases. However, the advent of orphan drug development has also triggered several questions, from the definition of rarity to the pricing of orphan drugs and their impact on health-care systems. This article provides an industry perspective on some of the common questions and misconceptions related to orphan drug development and its regulation, with the aim of facilitating future progress in the field.