Needs and Experiences With Health Care Providers of Adult Rare Disease Patients and Caregivers of People With Rare Diseases: Protocol for a Qualitative Study.

BACKGROUND: Rare diseases in Europe are defined as diseases with a prevalence of less than 5 per 10,000 people. Despite their individual rarity, the total number of rare diseases is considerable. Rare diseases are often chronic and complex, affecting physical, mental, and neurological health. People with rare diseases face challenges such as delayed diagnosis, limited medical support, and financial burden. Caregivers, usually family members, bear significant physical and emotional burdens. Understanding the experiences of patients with rare disease and their caregivers is critical to effective care, but this is still underresearched. Better support and understanding of the challenges faced by both patients and caregivers is clearly needed. Our study will explore the experiences and needs of people with rare diseases and caregivers of people with rare diseases in relation to accessing health services. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to explore the experiences of patients with rare disease and their caregivers with Slovenian health care providers and to create a theoretical model of needs and experiences. METHODS: This is a qualitative thematic analysis study, using the codebook approach. The study will conduct semi-open-ended interviews to understand the experiences and needs of people with rare diseases and caregivers of people with rare diseases in relation to accessing health services. The interview questions will be based on an extensive literature review. Data from the interviews will be analyzed using thematic analysis to identify patterns and build a thematic map. Data will be analyzed by at least 2 coders. To ensure reliability, respondent validation will be conducted and negative cases investigated. Any discrepancies will be resolved by consulting the entire research team until a consensus is reached. RESULTS: This study was not specifically funded. However, author TC is supported by grant number P3-0339 from the Slovenian Agency for Research and Innovation. This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the Republic of Slovenia (0120-47/2022/3), and recruitment is expected to begin in May 2024, with data analysis results anticipated by the end of 2025. CONCLUSIONS: This study will fill an important research gap in Slovenia by exploring the needs and experiences of people living with rare diseases and their caregivers. The results will contribute to the broader field of rare diseases and add knowledge that can inform future research processes and intervention strategies. It also aims to identify neglected areas that have a significant impact on the lives of people with rare diseases. This study is important not only because it addresses the immediate needs of the Slovenian rare disease community, but also because it contributes to a discussion on patient-centered care, health policy design, and the inclusion of psychosocial components in health care. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/53362.

Determining Commonalities in the Experiences of Patients with Rare Diseases: A Qualitative Analysis of US Food and Drug Administration Patient Engagement Sessions.

BACKGROUND: Rare diseases are estimated to affect more than one in ten Americans. However, most patients with a rare disease face significant emotional, physical, and social challenges. To better understand the burden of disease and unmet needs, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) conducts and supports multiple patient engagement platforms. We analyzed summaries from these discussions to identify commonalities among patients with disparate rare diseases, the results of which could inform priorities for cross-disease policies and medical product development. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative analysis of patient engagement session summaries to investigate shared experiences across rare diseases. Cross-disease similarities were identified within four dimensions: product development/regulatory, clinical/physical, social/psychological, and economic/financial. Summaries from 29 rare diseases were included in our analyses. RESULTS: Within the product development/regulatory dimension, we observed that patients and caregivers across rare diseases shared the desire for development of medical products that cured their disease or improved their overall quality of life. In the clinical/physical dimension, we found that patients had numerous common symptoms, including pain and fatigue. In the social/psychological dimension, we observed significant negative impact on mental health. Within the economic/financial dimension, patients and caregivers shared that disease burden caused significant financial hardships. CONCLUSION: We found remarkable similarities among patients with rare diseases across all four dimensions. Our results indicate that, even among rare diseases with diverse etiologies, patients share numerous commonalties due to their diseases: a lack of effective treatment options, certain physical symptoms, mental health challenges, and financial concerns.

Measuring parent proxy-reported quality of life of 11 rare diseases in children in Zhejiang, China.

BACKGROUND: It has become increasingly important to measure the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of rare diseases in children and adolescents in recent decades. Much attention has been paid to investigate the HROoL of a specific rare disease by self-report in previous studies. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the HROoL of 11 rare diseases in Chinese children by parent proxy-report, to explore the factors associated with HROoL of patients, and to understand the problems of most concern. METHODS: A total of 651 children aged from 2 to 18 were enrolled from the Children's Hospital Affiliated Zhejiang University in 2018. Their parents completed the parent proxy-report version of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory™ 4.0 (PedsQL™ 4.0). Independent samples t-test, one-way ANOVA, or Kruskal-Wallis H test was used to compare HROoL scores between groups. Multilevel linear regression models with random intercept were applied to analyze the relationship between socioeconomic variables and both the total score and subdomain scores. RESULTS: The total PedsQL scores of Patent ductus arteriosus (PDA), Infantile agranulocytosis, Autoimmune thrombocytopenia (ITP), Polysyndactyly, Hirschsprung disease, Cleft lip and palate, Tetralogy of fallot, Myasthenia gravis, Guillain-barre syndrome, Glycogen storage disease, and Langerhans cell histiocytosis children were 79.65 ± 5.46, 95.88 ± 3.48, 71.39 ± 3.27, 91.77 ± 6.35, 76.18 ± 6.92, 96.33 ± 4.22, 77.85 ± 8.90, 95.99 ± 3.31, 85.77 ± 4.56, 82.97 ± 4.13 and 77.6 ± 5.15, respectively. Age was significantly associated with physical functioning, school functioning, and psychosocial health scores. The household registration place was significantly related to the total score. The most urgent desire of patients was to reduce the overall medical costs. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that patients with PDA had the lowest physical functioning score, while patients with ITP scored the lowest in the emotional functioning, social functioning, school functioning, psychosocial health, and total scores. Incentive policies should be further adopted to improve orphan drug availability and reduce the economic burden of rare diseases.

Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on patients with rare disease in Hong Kong.

The COVID-19 pandemic has had significant health, social, and economic consequences internationally. While the pandemic has direct implications on infected patients and families, there is a need to examine the pandemic's effect on patients with non-COVID-19-related diseases. This study examines the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on 272 rare disease patients with 89 distinct rare diseases in Hong Kong using a cross-sectional online survey between April 10 and April 29, 2020 from the patient and caregiver perspective. The pandemic has impacted patient's health status in 46%, service use patterns in 71%, mental health in 79%, daily living in 82%, social life in 92%, and financial status in 81% of patients. Patient's health status, medical and rehabilitation, and mental health were more impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic in the group of patients with any level of dependency according to the Barthel Index for Activities of Daily Living compared with that in the group of patients who are fully independent (p < 0.0001; p < 0.0001; p = 0.0420). This study is the first study to examine the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the rare disease population in Hong Kong, and demonstrates the pandemic's effect on service and resource utilization, and patient's physical and mental well-being.

'Mapping' Health State Utility Values from Non-preference-Based Measures: A Systematic Literature Review in Rare Diseases.

BACKGROUND: The use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to monitor the effects of disease and treatment on patient symptomatology and daily life is increasing in rare diseases (RDs) (i.e. those affecting less than one in 2000 people); however, these instruments seldom yield health state utility values (HSUVs) for cost-utility analyses. In such a context, 'mapping' allows HSUVs to be obtained by establishing a statistical relationship between a 'source' (e.g. a disease-specific PROM) and a 'target' preference-based measure [e.g. the EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) tool]. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to systematically review all published studies using 'mapping' to derive HSUVs from non-preference-based measures in RDs, and identify any critical issues related to the main features of RDs, which are characterised by small, heterogeneous, and geographically dispersed patient populations. METHODS: The following databases were searched during the first half of 2019 without time, study design, or language restrictions: MEDLINE (via PubMed), the School of Health and Related Research Health Utility Database (ScHARRHUD), and the Health Economics Research Centre (HERC) database of mapping studies (version 7.0). The keywords combined terms related to 'mapping' with Orphanet's list of RD indications (e.g. 'acromegaly') in addition to 'rare' and 'orphan'. 'Very rare' diseases (i.e. those with fewer than 1000 cases or families documented in the medical literature) were excluded from the searches. A predefined, pilot-tested extraction template (in Excel®) was used to collect structured information from the studies. RESULTS: Two groups of studies were identified in the review. The first group (n = 19) developed novel mapping algorithms in 13 different RDs. As a target measure, the majority used EQ-5D, and the others used the Short-Form Six-Dimension (SF-6D) and 15D; most studies adopted ordinary least squares (OLS) regression. The second group of studies (n = 9) applied previously published algorithms in non-RDs to comparable RDs, mainly in the field of cancer. The critical issues relating to 'mapping' in RDs included the availability of very few studies, the relatively high number of cancer studies, and the absence of research in paediatric RDs. Moreover, the reviewed studies recruited small samples, showed a limited overlap between RD-specific and generic PROMs, and highlighted the presence of cultural and linguistic factors influencing results in multi-country studies. Lastly, the application of existing algorithms developed in non-RDs tended to produce inaccuracies at the bottom of the EQ-5D scale, due to the greater severity of RDs. CONCLUSIONS: More research is encouraged to develop algorithms for a broader spectrum of RDs (including those affecting young children), improve mapping study quality, test the generalisability of algorithms developed in non-RDs (e.g. HIV) to rare variants or evolutions of the same condition (e.g. AIDS wasting syndrome), and verify the robustness of results when mapped HSUVs are used in cost-utility models.

Rare diseases and the associative dialogue: resignifications for moral experiences. / Adoecimentos raros e o diálogo associativo: ressignificações para experiências morais.

This paper aims to discuss the experience of relatives of children and adolescents with rare diseases as a moral experience. Moral experience is characterized by suffering that is socially interpreted as a catastrophic event, mobilizing resources for signification and meaning that allow the reconstruction of identity, the appreciation of itineraries from a rare diagnosis, as well as the search for peers. Thus, the construction of relationships of recognition, alterity, and belonging is fundamental. From a symbolic interactionist perspective, the results show two significant cores: (1) shock as a surprise in the face of an unexpected diagnosis, leading to the search for peers and promotion of social recognition; (2) the cost involved with the course of a rare disease that implies a care work and the acquisition of associative capital as a possibility of strengthening and building the social capital of health care.

Neste artigo, buscamos discutir a experiência de familiares de crianças e adolescentes com doenças raras como uma experiência moral. A experiência moral se caracteriza pelo sofrimento que é lido, coletivamente, como acontecimento catastrófico, mobilizando recursos para significação e sentido que possibilitem reconstruções identitárias, valoração de novas trajetórias a partir de um diagnóstico raro, assim como a busca de pares. Nesse sentido, é fundamental a construção de relações de reconhecimento, alteridade e pertencimento. A partir de uma perspectiva interacionista simbólica, os resultados mostram dois núcleos: (1) o susto como surpresa diante do diagnóstico inesperado, levando a busca de pares e promoção do reconhecimento social; (2) o custo envolvido com a trajetória de uma doença rara que implica um trabalho de care e a aquisição de capital associativo como possibilidade de fortalecimento e construção de capital social de cuidado à saúde.

Adoecimentos raros e o diálogo associativo: ressignificações para experiências morais / Rare diseases and the associative dialogue: resignifications for moral experiences

Resumo Neste artigo, buscamos discutir a experiência de familiares de crianças e adolescentes com doenças raras como uma experiência moral. A experiência moral se caracteriza pelo sofrimento que é lido, coletivamente, como acontecimento catastrófico, mobilizando recursos para significação e sentido que possibilitem reconstruções identitárias, valoração de novas trajetórias a partir de um diagnóstico raro, assim como a busca de pares. Nesse sentido, é fundamental a construção de relações de reconhecimento, alteridade e pertencimento. A partir de uma perspectiva interacionista simbólica, os resultados mostram dois núcleos: (1) o susto como surpresa diante do diagnóstico inesperado, levando a busca de pares e promoção do reconhecimento social; (2) o custo envolvido com a trajetória de uma doença rara que implica um trabalho de care e a aquisição de capital associativo como possibilidade de fortalecimento e construção de capital social de cuidado à saúde.

Abstract This paper aims to discuss the experience of relatives of children and adolescents with rare diseases as a moral experience. Moral experience is characterized by suffering that is socially interpreted as a catastrophic event, mobilizing resources for signification and meaning that allow the reconstruction of identity, the appreciation of itineraries from a rare diagnosis, as well as the search for peers. Thus, the construction of relationships of recognition, alterity, and belonging is fundamental. From a symbolic interactionist perspective, the results show two significant cores: (1) shock as a surprise in the face of an unexpected diagnosis, leading to the search for peers and promotion of social recognition; (2) the cost involved with the course of a rare disease that implies a care work and the acquisition of associative capital as a possibility of strengthening and building the social capital of health care.

Perceived burden in dealing with different rare diseases: a qualitative focus group study.

OBJECTIVES: There are more than 6000 heterogeneous rare diseases and little is known about shared experiences of affected individuals in everyday life and healthcare. Objective of this study was to explore perceived burden of patients with rare chronic diseases and identify commonalities and differences in the experiences of patients with four heterogeneous conditions. DESIGN: A qualitative focus group study. SETTING: In four separate and diagnostically homogeneous focus groups, we asked patients about the perceived burden of living with their rare disease. The focus groups took place at a university medical centre in Germany. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals with neurofibromatosis type 1 (n=4), primary sclerosing cholangitis (n=5), pulmonary arterial hypertension (n=4) and Marfan syndrome (n=5). RESULTS: We identified five main themes: medical problems, psychological burden, problems with the healthcare system, constraints and interpersonal problems. While medical problems differed widely between the diagnostic groups, patients with different conditions independently reported many common problems including psychological burden, constraints in professional, personal and daily life, stigmatisation and others lacking understanding. Shared problems pertaining to the healthcare system seem related to the rarity of the conditions (eg, limited access to adequate care, lack of knowledge). CONCLUSIONS: Despite clinical heterogeneity of rare diseases, affected individuals have many common experiences. Some of these experiences may resemble the burden of living with a chronic disease. However, patients reported aspects, which seem to be specific for rare chronic diseases. Generic interventions targeting shared burdens among patients with different diseases could provide adequate treatment in light of finite healthcare resources.

[Treatment networks and associations of patients with rare diseases]. / Redes de tratamento e as associações de pacientes com doenças raras.

Patients' associations are an example of biosocial groups, since their formation is motivated by common biological characteristics, such as rare diseases, and they are sometimes included in social movements in health. Even though the National Policy on Comprehensive Care for Persons with Rare Diseases was enacted in 2014, patients still struggle to ensure access to and treatment by the Unified Health System. The way in which associations of patients with rare diseases gain access to treatment via social networks, is investigated. This research is part of a study about the use of social media by associations of patients with rare diseases, which employs netnography - ethnography applied to the web - as the data-gathering method. Data sources were pages of the associations on Facebook in Brazil. It was seen that the activities of the associations are multi-faceted, ranging from patient and family guidance about treatment and quality of life, to active participation in the elaboration and implementation of public policies. The discourses suggest that the focus of patients' associations is, in the majority of cases, the access to drugs rather than the effective enactment of the national policy geared towards rare diseases.

As associações de pacientes são um exemplo de grupos biossociais, já que sua constituição é motivada por questões biológicas comuns, tais como as doenças raras, e estão, por vezes, inscritas no movimento social em saúde. Apesar da Política Nacional de Atenção Integral às Pessoas com Doenças Raras ter sido promulgada em 2014, os pacientes ainda têm dificuldade em garantir acesso a tratamento pelo Sistema Único de Saúde. Investigamos como as associações de pacientes com doenças raras tecem, através das redes sociais virtuais, o acesso a tratamento. Esta pesquisa é parte de um estudo sobre o uso das mídias sociais pelas associações de pacientes com doenças raras, e emprega como método a netnografia. As fontes da pesquisa foram páginas de associações de pacientes com doenças raras no Brasil presentes no Facebook. Observamos que a atuação das associações de pacientes é plural, indo desde a orientação de pacientes e familiares sobre questões relacionadas a tratamento e qualidade de vida, até a participação ativa na elaboração e implementação de políticas públicas. Os discursos sugerem que o foco destas associações é, na maior parte dos casos, o acesso a medicamentos, em detrimento da implantação efetiva da Política Nacional de Atenção Integral às Pessoas com Doenças Raras.

Assessment of distress and quality of life in rare cancers.

OBJECTIVE: Rare cancers are a heterogeneous group of conditions that can be associated with emotional and physical impairments. In view of the dearth of research in this area, we investigated the quality of life and prevalence of distress in a cohort of patients diagnosed with a rare cancer, classified by the RARECARE definition. METHODS: A cohort of rare cancer patients, treated in a Brazilian public cancer center, was assessed for distress (Distress Thermometer), anxiety/depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), and quality of life (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General Version). Descriptive statistics were generated, and multivariate analyses were used to identify factors associated with distress, anxiety/depression, and quality of life. RESULTS: A total of 137 patients (52.6% male, mean age of 50 years; range 18-90) were identified. Nearly half (49.6%) of patients reported high levels of distress, with 19.7% endorsing anxiety and 15.3% depression. In multivariate analysis, demographic and clinical variables associated with worse psychosocial outcomes included younger age (P < 0.05), female gender (P < 0.01), advanced disease stage (P < 0.01), and engagement in active therapy (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Patients diagnosed with rare cancer reported poorer psychosocial outcomes and impaired quality of life when compared to the general population of cancer patients. Certain demographic groups (eg, women and younger patients) may benefit from targeted psychosocial interventions.

DIFFERENTIATION OF HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES BETWEEN FIVE DISEASE AREAS: RESULTS FROM AN INTERNATIONAL SURVEY OF PATIENTS.

OBJECTIVES: Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) data generated by generic, preference-based instruments (i.e., EQ-5D) are highly demanded in health policy decision making, because they allow for direct comparisons of HRQoL outcomes between disease areas. We aimed to quantify HRQoL outcomes in breast cancer (BC), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), multiple sclerosis (MS), rare cancers (RC), and rare disease (RD) patients and understand the patterns that differentiate HRQoL outcomes between these disease areas, and more specifically between rare and more common disease population groups. METHODS: An international, Web survey of patients measured HRQoL (EQ-5D-5L), self-perceived health (EQ-5D-5L Visual Analogue Scale), and additional QoL dimensions, such as patient disability level. RESULTS: We received 675 completed responses. Average utility loss was 53.5 percent, 32.5 percent, and 33.3 percent for RD, RA, and MS patients, respectively, in contrast to 18.6 percent for BC and RC patients. Statistically significant differences (p < .05) were observed between disease groups in all EQ-5D-5L domain outcomes, apart from that of "Anxiety/Depression." Severe and/or extreme problems were reported in performing usual activities for RD and RC (34 percent and 13 percent of overall problems reported respectively), mobility for MS (18 percent), pain/discomfort for RA (13 percent), and anxiety/depression for BC (7 percent) patients. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated significant differences in the dimensions that drive HRQoL outcomes between rare and more common diseases and showcased that the same EQ-5D utility may reflect very different severities depending on the patient population under investigation. Future research should examine whether outcomes in other, critical HRQoL domains not included in generic measures also highlight significant differences across disease areas.

[Is "associativism" good for one's health? The case of rare diseases]. / O Associativismo faz bem à saúde? O caso das doenças raras.

Based on the question of an inspiring work - "Is the Market good for one's Health?", this paper poses a similar question, centered on "associativism" (belonging to a labor group or association) and the field of rare diseases. Starting from the research carried out in the scope of the Master's Degree in Sociology of the School of Economics of the University of Coimbra, this text puts into perspective the formulations created for the field of genetic conditions that, mainly, depart from a Eurocentric vision. The field of rare diseases is analyzed, identifying the roles, relationships and motivations of the different actors, namely, civil associations, pharmaceutical industry, academy, government, and families. The analysis highlights the preponderance of the market and the production of medicines, identifying a governance model - Utility Model of Care - in which the person who suffers and his/her family are left devoid of their subjectivity and transmuted into medication and market agents.

Baseado no questionamento "O Mercado faz bem à Saúde?" de um trabalho inspirador, este artigo realiza um questionamento semelhante, centrado no associativismo e no campo das doenças raras. Partindo da pesquisa realizada no âmbito do Mestrado em Sociologia da Faculdade de Economia da Universidade de Coimbra, este texto coloca em perspectiva as formulações criadas para o campo das condições genéticas que, majoritariamente, partem de uma visão eurocentrista. Analisa-se o campo das doenças raras, identificando os papéis, as relações e as motivações dos diferentes atores, nomeadamente, associações civis, indústria farmacêutica, academia, governo e famílias. Da análise sobressai a preponderância do mercado e da produção de medicamentos, identificando-se um modelo de governação ­ Modelo Utilitário de Cuidado ­, no qual a pessoa que sofre e as suas famílias são esvaziadas da sua subjetividade e transmutadas em medicação e agentes de mercado.

O Associativismo faz bem à saúde? O caso das doenças raras / Is "associativism" good for one's health? The case of rare diseases

Resumo Baseado no questionamento "O Mercado faz bem à Saúde?" de um trabalho inspirador, este artigo realiza um questionamento semelhante, centrado no associativismo e no campo das doenças raras. Partindo da pesquisa realizada no âmbito do Mestrado em Sociologia da Faculdade de Economia da Universidade de Coimbra, este texto coloca em perspectiva as formulações criadas para o campo das condições genéticas que, majoritariamente, partem de uma visão eurocentrista. Analisa-se o campo das doenças raras, identificando os papéis, as relações e as motivações dos diferentes atores, nomeadamente, associações civis, indústria farmacêutica, academia, governo e famílias. Da análise sobressai a preponderância do mercado e da produção de medicamentos, identificando-se um modelo de governação - Modelo Utilitário de Cuidado -, no qual a pessoa que sofre e as suas famílias são esvaziadas da sua subjetividade e transmutadas em medicação e agentes de mercado.

Abstract Based on the question of an inspiring work - "Is the Market good for one's Health?", this paper poses a similar question, centered on "associativism" (belonging to a labor group or association) and the field of rare diseases. Starting from the research carried out in the scope of the Master's Degree in Sociology of the School of Economics of the University of Coimbra, this text puts into perspective the formulations created for the field of genetic conditions that, mainly, depart from a Eurocentric vision. The field of rare diseases is analyzed, identifying the roles, relationships and motivations of the different actors, namely, civil associations, pharmaceutical industry, academy, government, and families. The analysis highlights the preponderance of the market and the production of medicines, identifying a governance model - Utility Model of Care - in which the person who suffers and his/her family are left devoid of their subjectivity and transmuted into medication and market agents.

Redes de tratamento e as associações de pacientes com doenças raras / Treatment networks and associations of patients with rare diseases

Resumo As associações de pacientes são um exemplo de grupos biossociais, já que sua constituição é motivada por questões biológicas comuns, tais como as doenças raras, e estão, por vezes, inscritas no movimento social em saúde. Apesar da Política Nacional de Atenção Integral às Pessoas com Doenças Raras ter sido promulgada em 2014, os pacientes ainda têm dificuldade em garantir acesso a tratamento pelo Sistema Único de Saúde. Investigamos como as associações de pacientes com doenças raras tecem, através das redes sociais virtuais, o acesso a tratamento. Esta pesquisa é parte de um estudo sobre o uso das mídias sociais pelas associações de pacientes com doenças raras, e emprega como método a netnografia. As fontes da pesquisa foram páginas de associações de pacientes com doenças raras no Brasil presentes no Facebook. Observamos que a atuação das associações de pacientes é plural, indo desde a orientação de pacientes e familiares sobre questões relacionadas a tratamento e qualidade de vida, até a participação ativa na elaboração e implementação de políticas públicas. Os discursos sugerem que o foco destas associações é, na maior parte dos casos, o acesso a medicamentos, em detrimento da implantação efetiva da Política Nacional de Atenção Integral às Pessoas com Doenças Raras.

Abstract Patients' associations are an example of biosocial groups, since their formation is motivated by common biological characteristics, such as rare diseases, and they are sometimes included in social movements in health. Even though the National Policy on Comprehensive Care for Persons with Rare Diseases was enacted in 2014, patients still struggle to ensure access to and treatment by the Unified Health System. The way in which associations of patients with rare diseases gain access to treatment via social networks, is investigated. This research is part of a study about the use of social media by associations of patients with rare diseases, which employs netnography - ethnography applied to the web - as the data-gathering method. Data sources were pages of the associations on Facebook in Brazil. It was seen that the activities of the associations are multi-faceted, ranging from patient and family guidance about treatment and quality of life, to active participation in the elaboration and implementation of public policies. The discourses suggest that the focus of patients' associations is, in the majority of cases, the access to drugs rather than the effective enactment of the national policy geared towards rare diseases.

Building the patient community.

There are many challenges in conducting rare disease research. The conditions are often poorly understood, small patient populations are dispersed around the world, and there are limited funding opportunities. Patient groups can serve as a key partner in overcoming these challenges, as they understand the impact of rare conditions on patients' lives. This gives patient groups valuable scientific insights into the disease. This can be used to create research strategies, address research bottlenecks and directly fund research that appropriately addresses patient needs. Patient groups can also play a critical role in recruiting and retaining patients for clinical trials, which reduces time and resource waste. By partnering with patient groups, research teams can improve efficiency of research and best meet the needs of patients. Researchers can also play an important role in building and supporting patient groups to unlock these benefits.

ASPECTS OF PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOMES IN RARE DISEASES: A DISCUSSION PAPER.

OBJECTIVES: A patient reported outcome (PRO) is "any report of the status of a patient's health condition that comes directly from the patient without interpretation of the patient's response by a clinician or anyone else" (USFDA 2009). PROs are discussed widely, and many regard the patients' perspective on treatment benefit as very valuable. Although many PROs have shown satisfactory measurement properties including reliability, validity, and responsiveness, there is great concern about risk of bias, that is, in clinical trials. METHODS: Differences in perspectives of PRO measurement in rare diseases are given arising from methodology, clinical, HTA, and patient advocacy views. RESULTS: PROs are playing an important role in dealing with treatment benefit especially in small sample size as occurring often in rare diseases. Challenges remain especially regarding lack of responsiveness of generic measures, limited capture of all patient relevant aspects, study design and high risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS: PROs seem a valuable instrument to detect patient relevant aspects in rare diseases. They should be seen in addition to other approved assessment methods as randomized controlled trials but not as their substitute.

The supportive care needs of parents with a child with a rare disease: results of an online survey.

BACKGROUND: Parents caring for a child affected by a rare disease have unmet needs, the origins of which are complex and varied. Our aim was to determine the supportive care needs of parents caring for a child with a rare disease. METHODS: An online survey was developed consisting of 45 questions (108 items) and separated into six domains. The survey included questions about perceived level of satisfaction with receiving care, experiences and needs of providing daily care, the impacts of disease on relationships, the emotional and psychological burdens of disease, and parents overall satisfaction with the support received. RESULTS: Three-hundred and one parents from Australia and New Zealand completed the survey; 91 % (n = 275/301) were mothers, with 132 distinct rare diseases being reported. Fifty-four percent (n = 140/259) of parents were dissatisfied with health professionals' level of knowledge and awareness of disease; 71 % (n = 130/183) of parents felt they received less support compared to other parents. Information regarding present (60 %, n = 146/240) and future services (72 %, n = 174/240) available for their child were considered important. Almost half of parents (45 %, n = 106/236) struggled financially, 38 % (n = 99/236) reduced their working hours and 34 % (n = 79/236) ceased paid employment. Forty-two percent (n = 99/223) of parents had no access to a disease specific support group, and 58 % (n = 134/230) stated that their number of friends had reduced since the birth of their child; 75 % (n = 173/230) had no contact with other parents with a child with a similar disease, and 46 % (n = 106/230) reported feeling socially isolated and desperately lonely. Most frequent emotions expressed by parents in the week prior to completing the survey were anxiety and fear (53 %, n = 119/223), anger and frustration (46 %, n = 103/223) and uncertainty (39 %, n = 88/223). CONCLUSION: This study is the first to develop an online survey specifically for use with parents to investigate their supportive care needs across a large and diverse group of rare diseases. The findings highlight that parents with a child with a rare disease have common unmet needs regardless of what disease their child has. Such information may allow health providers to improve child outcomes through improving parental supportive care.

Rare diseases are a 'common' problem for clinicians.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 8% of the Australian population live with any one of about 10,000 known rare diseases. This is similar to the proportion of people living with diabetes or asthma. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this article is to review the impact of rare diseases on families and health services, and the role of the general practitioner (GP) and policy response in Australia. DISCUSSION: Research from the Australian Paediatric Surveillance Unit indicates that people living with rare diseases face significant challenges, including diagnostic delays, lack of available treatment and difficulty in finding the right health service. Families feel isolated, under-supported, and often face economic hardship. All GPs see people with rare diseases and have a crucial role in making appropriate referrals, coordinating care, supporting families, and linking them with psychosocial and other supports. GPs require access to current, relevant resources to assist them to help patients with rare diseases. A coordinated national approach to rare diseases is also needed in Australia.