Assessment of interleukin 17A and 23 in the course of bladder cancer and selected benign urological diseases.

Several cytokines have been indicated to be significantly involved in urological diseases. Interleukin 17A (IL-17A) and interleukin 23 (IL-23) have recently received attention for their involvement in inflammatory diseases and cancers. The aim of the study was to show changes in the level of pro-inflammatory interleukins IL-17A and IL-23 in patients with bladder cancer (BC) and selected urological diseases. An important cognitive aspect was to study the interdependencies between the studied interleukins and to assess their diagnostic value for such diseases. The material for the study was urine sample from patients with BC, urinary tract infection (UTI), urolithiasis, benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), US (urethral stricture), which was compared to the urine sample of healthy people without urological disorders. Interleukin concentrations were measured by the immunoenzymatic method. The levels of IL-17A and IL-23 in the urine of patients with BC, UTI, BPH and US were significantly higher compared to the control group. Statistically significant differences were found in the level of both interleukins compared to the control group in all diseases except urolithiasis. IL-17A and IL-23 correlated with each other in patients with all urological diseases except urolithiasis. The results of the conducted studies showed that selected urological diseases changed the levels of IL-17A and IL-23 in the urine of patients. The observations made confirmed the participation of these interleukins in the course of the urological diseases, especially in BC, and allowed to classify them as potentially useful parameters for diagnostic purposes.

Surgical Force: Initial Study and Clinical Implications in the Assessment of Ureteral Access Sheath Induced Injury.

Purpose: Ureteral access sheaths (UAS) pose the risk of severe ureteral injury. Our prior studies revealed forces ≤6 Newtons (N) prevent ureteral injury. Accordingly, we sought to define the force urologists and residents in training typically use when placing a UAS. Materials and Methods: Among urologists and urology residents attending two annual urological conferences in 2022, 121 individuals were recruited for the study. Participants inserted 12F, 14F, and 16F UAS into a male genitourinary model containing a concealed force sensor; they also provided demographic information. Analysis was completed using t-tests and Chi-square tests to identify group differences when passing a 16F sheath UAS. Participant traits associated with surpassing or remaining below a minimal force threshold were also explored through polychotomous logistic regression. Results: Participant force distributions were as follows: ≤4N (29%), >6N (45%), and >8N (32%). More years of practice were significantly associated with exerting >6N relative to forces between 4N and 6N; results for >8N relative to 4N and 8N were similar. Compared to high-volume ureteroscopists (those performing >20 ureteroscopies/month), physicians performing ≤20 ureteroscopies/month were significantly less likely to exert forces ≤4N (p = 0.017 and p = 0.041). Of those surpassing 6N and 8N, 15% and 18%, respectively, were high-volume ureteroscopists. Conclusions: Despite years of practice or volume of monthly ureteroscopic cases performed, most urologists failed to pass 16F access sheaths within the ideal range of 4N to 6N (74% of participants) or within a predefined safe range of 4N to 8N (61% of participants).

The Changing Roles of Urologists, Radiologists, and Advanced Practice Providers in Uroradiology Procedures.

INTRODUCTION: Urology has seen shifts in the management of many urologic conditions with the advent of noninvasive procedures that rely on multidisciplinary radiological modalities. This study seeks to analyze changes in urologists, radiologists, and advanced practice providers (APPs) performing uroradiology procedures over time. METHODS: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Physician/Procedure Summary data from 2010 to 2021 were utilized to examine uroradiology Current Procedural Terminology codes billed by urologists, radiologists, and APPs. Percent of total reimbursement and higher volume procedure count (after excluding providers with <11 procedures by per year) by each provider field was calculated and analyzed for changes in distribution from 2010 to 2021. RESULTS: There were significant changes in all procedures when examining procedure reimbursement distribution in 2010 to 2021 (P < .001). During the period, urology saw decreases in reimbursement proportion as large as 28.7% for kidney cryoablation and increases as large as 14.2% for nephrostomy tube removals. Radiology saw the largest decreases in reimbursement proportion with an 18.9% decrease for nephrostograms, while the largest increase was 23.6% for suprapubic tube placements. APPs saw the largest increase in suprapubic tube changes reimbursement proportion, which rose 14.2% from 2010 to 2021. There were significant changes in proportion in all procedures, except for antegrade stent, renal cryoablation, renal biopsy, and renal thermoablation. CONCLUSIONS: Uroradiology procedures have seen shifts in the distribution of which provider type performs each procedure. Most large changes in reimbursement and procedure proportion were shifted between urology and radiology, with APPs seeing smaller changes.

Increasing Role of the Advanced Practice Provider in Men's Health Clinics: An Analysis of Medicare and Commercial Claims in the United States.

INTRODUCTION: As urological care delivery in the U.S. continues to evolve to meet patient needs, we aim to clarify the role of advanced practice providers for publicly and privately insured patients in the treatment of male urological conditions commonly encountered in men's health clinics. METHODS: Medicare and commercial insurance claims from the Physician/Supplier Procedure Summary and Merative MarketScan Commercial Database were queried for procedures submitted by advanced practice providers between 2010 and 2021. Common urological conditions were identified using Current Procedural Terminology codes and grouped into 4 categories: testicular hypofunction, erectile dysfunction and Peyronie's disease, benign prostatic hyperplasia, and scrotal pain. The proportion of procedures submitted by advanced practice providers was calculated for each year and category. RESULTS: From 2010 to 2021, the proportion of advanced practice provider-submitted service counts for each condition within the MarketScan group increased up to 5-fold, with benign prostatic hyperplasia representing the greatest growth. The proportion of advanced practice provider-submitted service counts within the Medicare group increased up to 8-fold, with erectile dysfunction/Peyronie's disease representing the greatest fold change. The proportion of claims submitted by advanced practice providers treating all 4 conditions was higher in 2021 than 2010 in both publicly and privately insured groups. CONCLUSIONS: The role of advanced practice providers in men's urological health is increasing for both privately and publicly insured patient populations. Advanced practice providers play a critical role in urological care and can help to improve access to men's health.

ChatGPT Performance on the American Urological Association Self-assessment Study Program and the Potential Influence of Artificial Intelligence in Urologic Training.

OBJECTIVE: To assess chat generative pre-trained transformer's (ChatGPT) performance on the American Urological Association Self-Assessment Study Program (AUA SASP) and stratify performance by question stem complexity. METHODS: Questions from the 2021-2022 AUA SASP program were administered to ChatGPT version 3 (ChatGPT-3). Questions were administered to the model utilizing a standardized prompt. The answer choice selected by ChatGPT was then used to answer the question stem in the AUA SASP program. ChatGPT was then prompted to assign a question stem order (first, second, third) to each question. The percentage of correctly answered questions was determined for each order level. All responses provided by ChatGPT were qualitatively assessed for appropriate rationale. RESULTS: A total of 268 questions were administered to ChatGPT. ChatGPT performed better on 2021 compared to the 2022 AUA SASP question set, answering 42.3% versus 30.0% of questions correctly (P < .05). Hundred percent of answer explanations provided appropriate, relevant rationale regardless of whether the answer was correct. Further stratification included assessment by question order level. ChatGPT performed progressively better on the 2021 question set with decreasing order levels, with first-order questions reaching 53.8% (n = 14). However, differences in proportions did not reach statistical significance (P > .05). CONCLUSION: ChatGPT answered many high-level questions correctly and provided a reasonable rationale for each answer choice. While ChatGPT was unable to answer numerous first-order questions, future language processing model learning may lead to the optimization of its fund of knowledge. This may lead to the utilization of artificial intelligence like ChatGPT as an educational tool for urology trainees and professors.

[Uremic pruritus through healthcare administrative data].

Background: This retrospective observational study aimed at describing patients on hemodialysis with/without uremic pruritus (UP), their healthcare resource consumption and costs from the perspective of the Italian National Health Service (INHS). Methods: Through the cross-linkage of the healthcare administrative data collected in the ReS (Ricerca e Salute) database from 2015 to 2017, patients undergoing in-hospital/outpatient hemodialysis (index date) for ≥2 years were selected. After the exclusion of subjects with other causes of pruritus, UP/non-UP cohorts were created based on the presence/absence of UP-related treatment supplies and characterized. Treatments, hospitalizations and costs were analyzed. Results: Of 1239 patients on hemodialysis for ≥2 years (20.2% of all hemodialysis subjects), 218 (17.6%) were affected by UP. Both cohorts were mostly males and elderly. One year before and after the index date, 58.1% and 65.1% of UP patients received UP-related treatments, of which >50% were treated with antihistamines (mostly cetirizine), 10% gabapentin and 1.4% ultraviolet light therapy. The mean annual overall cost per patient with/without UP was €37,065/€35,988. Outpatient specialist services accounted for 80% (>77% hemodialysis), hospitalizations for 10% (>60% hemodialysis). Conclusions: Though the prevalence of UP and related healthcare costs charged to the INHS were underestimated, the burden of UP was not negligible. High-efficiency dialytic therapies performed 3 to UP patients seemed to largely weigh on the overall mean annual cost. The availability of specific and effective treatments for UP might offer cost and healthcare offsets.

Understanding the needs of low-income countries: how urologists can help.

Delivering urological humanitarian aid to countries with greater need has been provided by urologists associated with British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS) Urolink over the last 30 years. Urolink has realised the need to understand where that need is geographically, what tangible help is required, and how assistance can be delivered in the most ethically appropriate way. The World Bank stratification of countries by per capita gross national income has helped in the identification of low-come countries or lower-middle-income countries (LMICs), the vast majority of which are in sub-Saharan Africa. The medical and socioeconomic needs of those country's populations, which constitute 17% of the global community, are substantially different from that required in higher income countries. More than 40% of sub-Saharan Africa's population is aged <14 years, it has a substantially reduced life expectancy, which influences the type of pathologies seen, and perinatal complications are a major cause of morbidity for both mother and child. There is a significant problem with the availability of medical care in these countries and almost a third of global deaths have been attributed to the lack of access to emergency and elective surgery. Urologically, the main conditions demanding the attention of the very few available urologists are congenital anomalies, benign prostatic hypertrophy, urolithiasis, urethral stricture, and pelvic cancer. The management of these conditions is often substantially different from that in the UK, being limited by a lack of personnel, equipment, and access to geographically relevant guidelines appropriate to the healthcare environment. Assisting LMICs to develop sustainable urological services can be helped by understanding the local needs of linked institutions, establishing trusting and durable relationships with partner centres and by providing appropriate education that can be perpetuated, and disseminated, across a region of need.

Contemporary Assessment of the Economic Burden of Upper Urinary Tract Stone Disease in the United States: Analysis of One-Year Health Care Costs, 2011-2018.

Background: The U.S. health care landscape has witnessed numerous changes since implementation of the Affordable Care Act coupled with rising prevalence of upper urinary tract stone disease (SD). Data on the economic burden of SD during this period are lacking, providing the objective of our study. Materials and Methods: Adults diagnosed as having SD from 2011 to 2018 were identified from PearlDiver Mariner, a national all-payer database reporting reimbursements and prescription costs for all health care encounters. Patients undergoing operative and nonoperative care were identified. Time trends in annual expenditures were evaluated. Multivariable analysis evaluated determinants of spending. Results: A total of $10 billion were spent on SD management between 2011 and 2018 (median overall annual expenditure = $1.4 billion) among 786,756 patients. Inpatient, prescription, and outpatient costs accounted for 34.7%, 20.7%, and 44.6% of expenditures, respectively. Seventy-eight percent of patients were managed nonoperatively (total cost = $6.9 billion). The average overall cost per encounter was $13,587 ($17,102 for surgical vs $11,174 for nonsurgical care). Expenditures on inpatient care decreased significantly over time, while expenditures on prescriptions and outpatient care increased significantly. On multivariable analysis, a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was associated with higher spending, while associations for age, insurance, and region varied by treatment modality. Conclusions: The economic burden of SD management is substantial, dominated by expenditure on nonoperative management and outpatient care. Expenditures for prescription and outpatient care are rising, with the only consistent predictor of higher spending being CCI. Spending variation according to demographic, clinical, and geographic factors was evident.

Qualitative Assessment of Medical Information on YouTube: A Multilingual Comparison of Common Urological Conditions.

INTRODUCTION: Patients nowadays often search video-sharing platforms for online patient education materials. Since previous assessments of urological videos were limited to English, we systematically assessed the quality of videos on treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), prostate cancer (PCa), and urinary stone disease (USD) in 4 different languages on YouTube using validated instruments. METHODS: The search for videos on YouTube addressing treatment options of BPH, PCa, and USD was performed in October 2020 in -English, French, German, and Italian. Assessed parameters included basic data (e.g., number of views), grade of misinformation, and reporting of conflicts of interest. Quality of content was analyzed using the validated DISCERN questionnaire. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: A total of 240 videos (60 videos in each language) were analyzed. Videos on USD in English had the highest number of views (median views 271,878 [65,313-2,513,007]). The median overall quality of videos assessed showed a moderate quality (2.5-3.4 points out of 5 points for DISCERN item 16). Median total DISCERN score of all videos divided by language showed very similar results: English (39.75 points), French (38 points), German (39.5 points), and Italian (39 points). Comparing the different diseases, videos about BPH showed the highest median scores, especially in German language (median score 43.25 points). CONCLUSIONS: Videos concerning the treatment of BPH, PCa, and USD have a low to moderate quality of content, with no differences seen between the languages assessed. These findings further support the notion of improved patient information materials on video platforms such as YouTube.

Single Port Robotic Surgery in Urology.

PURPOSE: To provide a comprehensive review on the new da Vinci SP (single port) robotic surgical system. The published literature to date within urology and a description of the new system will be discussed. FINDINGS: There are currently no high-quality published studies with the SP robotic system. All studies are case series, many with 10 or fewer patients. However, all studies have found the SP system to be safe and feasible in performing most urological procedures. Renal and pelvic surgery using the SP robotic system is safe and feasible in the hands of expert robotic surgeons. Long-term, high-quality data is lacking. While the current high price and the learning curve will limit the SP systems' use in many health care systems, new updates and the release of robotic surgical systems from other developers may help drive down costs and encourage uptake.

Impact of Multidisciplinary Audit of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS)® Programs at a Single Institution.

BACKGROUND: As Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) programs expand across numerous subspecialties, growth and sustainability on a system level becomes increasingly important and may benefit from reporting multidisciplinary and financial data. However, the literature on multidisciplinary outcome analysis in ERAS is sparse. This study aims to demonstrate the impact of multidisciplinary ERAS auditing in a hospital system. Additionally, we describe developing a financial metric for use in gaining support for system-wide ERAS adoption and sustainability. METHODS: Data from HPB, colorectal and urology ERAS programs at a single institution were analyzed from a prospective ERAS Interactive Audit System (EIAS) database from September 2015 to June 2019. Clinical 30-day outcomes for the ERAS cohort (n = 1374) were compared to the EIAS pre-ERAS control (n = 311). Association between improved ERAS compliance and improved outcomes were also assessed for the ERAS cohort. The potential multidisciplinary financial impact was estimated from hospital bed charges. RESULTS: Multidisciplinary auditing demonstrated a significant reduction in postoperative length of stay (LOS) (1.5 days, p < 0.001) for ERAS patients in aggregate and improved ERAS compliance was associated with reduced LOS (coefficient - 0.04, p = 0.004). Improved ERAS compliance in aggregate also significantly associated with improved 30-day survival (odds ratio 1.04, p = 0.001). Multidisciplinary analysis also demonstrated a potential financial impact of 44% savings (p < 0.001) by reducing hospital bed charges across all specialties. CONCLUSIONS: Multidisciplinary auditing of ERAS programs may improve ERAS program support and expansion. Analysis across subspecialties demonstrated associations between improved ERAS compliance and postoperative LOS as well as 30-day survival, and further suggested a substantial combined financial impact.

Preliminary assessment of patient and physician satisfaction with the use of teleconsultation in urology during the COVID-19 pandemic.

PURPOSE: Lockdown during the COVID-19 pandemic compelled urologists to change access to healthcare, especially for oncology patients. Teleconsultation is a safe way to receive medical advice without a risk of infection, and was implemented urgently in our academic centres. Our purpose was to evaluate patient and physician satisfaction with teleconsultation set up during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: From March 16th 2020, all face-to-face consultations were cancelled in France, except for emergencies. Teleconsultation was started immediately by five senior urologists in two academic hospitals. All patients received an email survey including the validated Teleconsultation Satisfaction Questionnaire (TSQ) and demographic questions. Data were collected prospectively. Physicians also responded to the TSQ. Patient satisfaction was measured objectively with the validated 14-item TSQ. Each item was scored on a 5-point Likert scale. Factors associated with positive satisfaction with teleconsultation were assessed by multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Overall, 105 patients replied to the survey (91.3%). Median age was 66 years (IQR: 55‒71) and 95 were men (90.5%). Median overall TSQ score was 67 (IQR: 60‒69); teleconsultation was judged to be a good experience by 88 patients (83.8%) and four physicians (80%). Patients who met their surgeon for the first time were more likely to have a good experience (OR = 1.2 [95% CI 1.1‒1.5], p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Introduced rapidly during the COVID-19 lockdown, urology teleconsultation attained a high level of satisfaction among both patients and physicians. A major change in telemedicine use is foreseen in the post COVID-19 era.

Challenges in Urology during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused a global health threat. This disease has brought about huge changes in the priorities of medical and surgical procedures. This short review article summarizes several test methods for COVID-19 that are currently being used or under development. This paper also introduces the corresponding changes in the diagnosis and treatment of urological diseases during the COVID-19 pandemic. We further discuss the potential impacts of the pandemic on urology, including the outpatient setting, clinical work, teaching, and research.

Clinical characteristics and cost of hospital stay of octogenarians and nonagenarians in intensive care nephrology unit.

PURPOSE: As the population gets older, the elderly and very elderly patients are increasingly been treated in nephrology intensive care units (ICU). In this study we evaluated the characteristics and outcomes of the octogenarians (80-89 years old), nonagenarians (≥ 90 years old) and compared them with elderly (65-79 years old) patients treated in nephrology ICU. METHODS: Eighteen nonagenarians, 70 octogenarians and 88 elderly patients were included in the study. Indication for hospitalization, presence of comorbid diseases, and requirement for acute dialysis treatment were investigated. Need for mechanical ventilation, vasopressors, central venous catheterization, urinary catheterization, anticoagulation, and transfusion of blood products were evaluated. Mortality rate and hospital cost were calculated. Data about survival at 1 month after discharge was collected. RESULTS: Causes of hospitalization, need for dialysis treatment, mechanical ventilation, vasopressors, central venous catheterization, urinary catheterization, anticoagulation, and transfusion of blood products were not different between age groups. Diabetes mellitus and malignancy were more frequent in elderly, whereas dementia/Alzheimer's disease was more common in nonagenarians. Although, mortality in ICU was increased as the age increased, it was statistically insignificant. However, 1 month mortality rate after discharge from hospital was increased especially in nonagenarians. In nonagenarians infection, whereas in octogenarians need for dialysis treatment, were related with mortality. Length of intensive care stay and hospital cost did not differ between age groups. CONCLUSION: Length of nephrology intensive care stay, mortality rate and hospital cost did not differ for very elderly age groups, but mortality risk was higher for nonagenarians after discharge from hospital.

[Socio-economic aspects of neurogenic dysfunctions in urology].

AIM: to evaluate the medico-economic significance of neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD) in the Russian Federation, to calculate the economic burden of NLUTD in patients with targeted entities and to prepare suggestions for improving the methods of payment for the provision of medical care to patients with NLUTD in inpatient practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: an analysis of the literature and an expert assessment of the prevalence of NLUTD in the Russian Federation were performed. Due to the various etiology of NLUTD, the following entities were considered: craniocerebral trauma, acute stroke, multiple sclerosis, spinal cord injury (hereinafter referred to as targeted entities), characterized by the highest rate of NLUTD and high social significance (damage to the working-age population): traumatic brain injury, acute stroke, multiple sclerosis, spinal cord injury. The calculations of the economic burden of NLUTD and its main complications (stage 5 of chronic kidney disease (CKD), urinary tract infection) in the Russian Federation (using mainly the normative method) were carried out, based on national statistics, regulatory legal acts and expert assessments of healthcare specialists. Proposals have been prepared for improving the reimbursement (tariffs of the KSG) for payment of NLUTD in the inpatient practice. RESULTS: according to the study, the number of patients with NLUTD due to the group of targeted entities is estimated at 910 000. The economic burden (excluding indirect and unaccounted costs) of the NLUTD is 33.3 billion rubles per year. The burden associated with secondary complications (stage 5 CKD, urogenital infection) due to ineffective diagnosis and treatment of NLUTD is 51.6 billion rubles. The total costs on the NLUTD is estimated at 84.9 billion rubles. Direct costs, calculated by the normative method based on the analysis of standards of medical care per patient are 36,546 rubles per year. Provision of medical care to patients with NLUTD in accordance with federal guarantees within the framework of the compulsory medical insurance is provided in accordance with the tariffs of KSG st30.005 (profile "urology"). The KSG tariff for 2019 (taking into account the established standards of financial costs for one case of hospitalization in the inpatient department and the established cost-intensity coefficients (CZ) established by the CG is 21,495.07 rubles, which is 58% of the minimum need, excluding the cost of treatment of complications, according to the normative method of calculation. The real estimate of the tariff for the payment of treatment of NLUTD in the constituent entities of the Russian Federation is 35-38% of the minimum need, excluding the cost of treatment of complications, according to the normative method of calculation. The real estimate of the costs for the treatment of NLUTD in regions is 35-38% of the minimum need, excluding the cost of treatment of complications, according to the normative method of calculation. To provide effective specialized urological care in the framework of compulsory medical insurance at the rates of the CSG for neuro-urological care (st30.005), expert calculations of the actual cost of NLUTD therapy were made. The proposed average cost of the CSG and the values of the cost intensity factors: CSG (min) st30.005.1 - 39,936 rubles, CZ - 1.65; CSG (max) st30.005.2 - 68,531 rubles, CZ - 2.75. The weighted average savings while expanding the availability of complex neuro-urological care for patients with NLUTD in accordance with the proposed payment rates is 9.4 billion rubles per year. CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation of the prevalence and burden of NLUTD showed the high medical and economic significance of NLUTD in the Russian Federation. The results of the study indicate a significant discrepancy between the requirements and the real costs within federal guarantees for the organization of medical care for patients with NLUTD. To provide effective specialized urological care in the compulsory medical insurance at the rates of CSG for neuro-urological care, it is necessary to increase funding, through the correction at the federal level of the cost-intensity coefficient from 1.65 to 2.75 for the CSG st30.005, which will ensure the increase in the cost for a case of treatment in inpatient department in form 39 936 to 68 531 rubles. The weighted average savings while expanding the availability of complex neuro-urological care for patients with NLUTD in accordance with the proposed payment rates is 9.4 billion rubles per year.

[Assessment of a post-emergency pathway with early urological regulation]. / Analyse d'un modèle de circuit court post-urgence avec une régulation précoce urologique.

INTRODUCTION: Urological emergencies represent 7 % of the outpatients at the emergency department (ED). We assessed the effect of setting up a post-emergency consultation (CPU) after deferred urological medical regulation. METHODS: All patients admitted to the ED in a university center over the period December 2017 to July 2018 and for whom a CPU was scheduled were included. The regulation concerned the date of CPU and supplementary exams. The main outcome was the ability to provide an efficient response according to a predefined grid of specific solutions. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-eight patients were included. The median age was 57 years (18-97). Efficacy of the CPU was 76 %. This rate was lower in no-show patients or consulting for rare and complex motives (47 %, n=60). The no-show were not reachable on the first call in 51.6 % of cases, with a similar age and motives distribution to the others. Only 6,9 % (n=128) of all consultants (n=1863) had been referred to the CPU by emergency physicians. The decision was a second consultation in 70 % (48), a new exam in 10 % (7), deferred emergency surgery in 12 % (8) and finally 18 % (12) of no follow-up. CONCLUSION: CPU following early regulation by a urologist provides an effective response in 76 % of situations. Assessment of "no-shows" helped to identify groups at risk. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

To defer or not to defer? A German longitudinal multicentric assessment of clinical practice in urology during the COVID-19 pandemic.

INTRODUCTION: After the outbreak of COVID-19 unprecedented changes in the healthcare systems worldwide were necessary resulting in a reduction of urological capacities with postponements of consultations and surgeries. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An email was sent to 66 urological hospitals with focus on robotic surgery (RS) including a link to a questionnaire (e.g. bed/staff capacity, surgical caseload, protection measures during RS) that covered three time points: a representative baseline week prior to COVID-19, the week of March 16th-22nd and April 20th-26th 2020. The results were evaluated using descriptive analyses. RESULTS: 27 out of 66 questionnaires were analyzed (response rate: 41%). We found a decrease of 11% in hospital beds and 25% in OR capacity with equal reductions for endourological, open and robotic procedures. Primary surgical treatment of urolithiasis and benign prostate syndrome (BPS) but also of testicular and penile cancer dropped by at least 50% while the decrease of surgeries for prostate, renal and urothelial cancer (TUR-B and cystectomies) ranged from 15 to 37%. The use of personal protection equipment (PPE), screening of staff and patients and protection during RS was unevenly distributed in the different centers-however, the number of COVID-19 patients and urologists did not reach double digits. CONCLUSION: The German urological landscape has changed since the outbreak of COVID-19 with a significant shift of high priority surgeries but also continuation of elective surgical treatments. While screening and staff protection is employed heterogeneously, the number of infected German urologists stays low.

Management of Patients Who Seek Urologic Care in Covid-19 Pandemic Era.

INTRODUCTION:  Novel coronavirus Disease (Covid-19) has emerged in Wuhan, China in December 2019 and became a pandemic in a few weeks. In this review, we aimed to summarize the current urologic practice trends worldwide to help urologist in decision making in disasters particularly in Covid-19 pandemic. MATERIAL AND METHOD:  We have performed a PubMed and Internet search by using the keywords: 'Covid', 'new coronavirus', 'coronavirus urology, 'covid urology' without a date restriction.  Results: All elective surgeries for benign urological conditions such as urinary tract stone disease that not caused complicated obstruction, benign prostate enlargement, infertility, incontinence and genitourinary prolapse, erectile dysfunction undescendent testis, vesico-ureteral reflux   should be postponed till the lasting of Covid-19 outbreak. In obstructing ureteral stone both nephrostomy tube and double-J stent insertion are valid management options. However, one must consider that these procedures must be performed under local anesthesia when possible to spare a ventilator. When deferring urooncological operations and treatments oncological outcomes must be considered. Aggressive cessation or reducing the dosage of immunosuppressant therapy might be an option in renal transplanted patients with severe pneumonia or acute respiratory distress syndrome.