Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Ophthalmol ; 235: 249-257, 2022 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34543660

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To determine the role and optimal timing of glaucoma surgery in relation to Boston keratoprosthesis type 1 (KPro) implantation. DESIGN: Retrospective, comparative, nonrandomized clinical study. METHODS: Single-center study of a total of 100 eyes (100 patients) implanted with a KPro between 2008 and 2017, and diagnosed with glaucoma before or after KPro. Patients were separated into 2 groups: those with preexisting glaucoma and those who developed de novo glaucoma after KPro. Groups were then divided based on whether patients were medically or surgically managed. Glaucoma surgery included glaucoma drainage device (GDD) implantation, trabeculectomy, and cyclophotocoagulation (CPC). Primary outcomes included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), glaucoma progression, and complications. Differences in outcomes were compared using parametric and nonparametric tests, as well as log-rank test to compare time-to-outcome events. RESULTS: Among 72 eyes with preexisting glaucoma, 27 (38%) had glaucoma surgery before KPro (18 GDD), whereas 45 (62%) were medically managed only. Among the latter, 19 (42%) needed glaucoma surgery post-KPro (16 GDD). Among 28 eyes with de novo glaucoma, 12 (43%) had glaucoma surgery post-KPro (9 GDD). For eyes with preexisting glaucoma, glaucoma progression was greater with glaucoma surgery performed post-KPro (100%) compared with pre-KPro (74%, P = .016) and to medical management (54%, P = .002). No increase in complications were observed with glaucoma surgery compared to medications only (P > .05), whereas fewer eyes maintained a BCVA of 20/200 or better over time with medical management (P = .013). Eyes with de novo glaucoma had similar progression, BCVA, and complications between medical and surgical care (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: Glaucoma surgery should be performed before or at the same time as KPro implantation in eyes with preexisting glaucoma. Complication rates are not increased when glaucoma surgery is performed in KPro eyes with either preexisting or de novo glaucoma. To ensure optimal glaucoma control, glaucoma surgery should be performed as early as possible in KPro eyes with good visual potential.


Assuntos
Órgãos Artificiais , Doenças da Córnea , Implantes para Drenagem de Glaucoma , Glaucoma , Órgãos Artificiais/efeitos adversos , Córnea/cirurgia , Doenças da Córnea/complicações , Doenças da Córnea/diagnóstico , Doenças da Córnea/cirurgia , Glaucoma/diagnóstico , Implantes para Drenagem de Glaucoma/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia , Próteses e Implantes/efeitos adversos , Implantação de Prótese/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Acuidade Visual
2.
Cornea ; 39(9): 1196-1205, 2020 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32501834

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To describe the causes and prevalence of moderate-to-severe visual impairment (MSVI) and blindness from corneal diseases, as well as corneal transplantation across Asia. METHODS: A meta-analysis of the published literature to identify population-based surveys conducted from 2008 to 2019 in 22 Asian countries regarding the prevalence and causes of MSVI and blindness from corneal disease, and a review of national corneal transplant data and eye bank statistics. RESULTS: A total of 5307 records were screened to identify 57 reports that were used to estimate a prevalence of MSVI and blindness caused by corneal diseases in Asia of 0.38% (95% confidence interval, 0.29%-0.48%). The most frequent corneal diseases were infectious keratitis, trauma, and pseudophakic bullous keratopathy. As expected, these represented the most common indications for corneal transplantation, although the percentages in each country differed based on the level of economic development, with pseudophakic bullous keratopathy being the most common indication in countries with higher gross national income per capita. Despite this, endothelial keratoplasty is not the most commonly performed form of corneal transplantation in any Asian country and represents only a small percentage of keratoplasty procedures performed in most countries. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of MSVI and blindness from corneal disease in Asia is approximately 0.4%, with a nearly 20-fold difference in the national prevalence across the region. The indications for keratoplasty, reflective of the causes of corneal dysfunction, also vary, more so according to the gross national income than to geographic location, and only a few Asian countries have rates of corneal transplantation above international means.


Assuntos
Cegueira/etiologia , Doenças da Córnea/complicações , Transplante de Córnea/métodos , Biometria , Doenças da Córnea/cirurgia , Humanos
3.
Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol ; 26(2): 101-106, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31543668

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This study was undertaken to ascertain the current magnitude and causes of blindness and visual impairment in persons aged 50 years and over and to assess the impact of a 10-year eye care program in Sokoto State, Nigeria. METHODS: A rapid assessment of avoidable blindness (RAAB) survey (in persons 50 years and over) was conducted in 2016. Participants were selected in Wurno health zone using a two-stage cluster randomized sampling with probability proportional to size. Operational definitions were based on RAAB and World Health Organization eye examination record definitions. Eye care program documents were reviewed and data from a baseline survey undertaken in 2005 were reanalyzed. RESULTS: A response of 89.1% (2405 of 2700 participants) was obtained in the 2016 survey. With available correction, the unadjusted prevalence of blindness was 7.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.4, 8.9). The odds of blindness were 1.8 times higher in females than males (95% CI: 1.3, 2.4; P < 0.001). Major causes of blindness were cataract (48.9%) corneal disease (20.1%), glaucoma (10.3%), and uncorrected refractive error/aphakia (8.7%). The age- and sex-adjusted prevalence of blindness has declined from 11.6% (95% CI: 7.4, 17.0) in 2005 to 6.8% (95% CI: 5.6, 8.0%) in 2016. CONCLUSION: The blindness prevalence is high, and the major causes are avoidable in the health zone. The findings suggest that investments in the program over the last 10 years might have led to almost a halving in the prevalence of blindness in th e population. However, the small sample size of persons 50+ years from Wurno zone in the 2005 survey necessitate caution when comparing the 2005 and the 2016 surveys.


Assuntos
Cegueira/epidemiologia , Atenção à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Baixa Visão/epidemiologia , Pessoas com Deficiência Visual/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Cegueira/etiologia , Catarata/complicações , Doenças da Córnea/complicações , Atenção à Saúde/organização & administração , Feminino , Glaucoma/complicações , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nigéria/epidemiologia , Exame Físico , Prevalência , Erros de Refração/complicações , Baixa Visão/etiologia
4.
Br J Ophthalmol ; 103(11): 1549-1552, 2019 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31266777

RESUMO

The Rapid Assessment of Avoidable Blindness, or RAAB, is a relatively simple and low-cost survey methodology to provide data on the prevalence and causes of visual loss. The aim of this article is to reflect on the achievements and challenges of RAAB, and to describe the future developments that are needed to ensure that it remains a relevant and widely used tool. To date, at least 331 RAABs have been undertaken in 79 countries, and these surveys provide an important source of information on visual loss at both the local and global level. A RAAB repository has been developed which includes the site and date of RAABs undertaken, and, where authors have agreed, the core indicators, reports or even raw data from the survey. This dataset has already been used for meta-analyses, and there are further opportunities for its use. Despite these achievements, there are core areas in which RAAB needs to be strengthened so that the full benefits of undertaking the survey can be reaped. Key developments of RAAB are underway, and will include greater use of mobile technologies using a cloud-based platform to enable both digital data collection, real-time survey reviews, reporting and analysis, and a greater emphasis on using the data for planning.


Assuntos
Cegueira/etiologia , Cegueira/prevenção & controle , Doenças da Córnea/diagnóstico , Erros de Refração/diagnóstico , Seleção Visual , Idoso , Cegueira/diagnóstico , Extração de Catarata , Doenças da Córnea/complicações , Doenças da Córnea/fisiopatologia , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Erros de Refração/complicações , Erros de Refração/fisiopatologia , Fatores de Tempo
5.
Ophthalmic Epidemiol ; 19(4): 211-5, 2012 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22775276

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To determine the prevalence and causes of blindness, severe visual impairment and visual impairment as well as cataract surgical coverage in two northern provinces of Burundi for the purpose of planning eye services. METHODS: The population-based Rapid Assessment of Avoidable Blindness survey methodology was used. RESULTS: Of 3800 people enrolled, 3684 (97%) were examined. The sample prevalences of blindness, severe visual impairment, and visual impairment were 1.1% (95% confidence interval, CI 0.8-1.4), 0.6% (95% CI 0.4-0.9), and 1.7% (95% CI 1.3-2.1), respectively. The leading causes of blindness were cataract (55%) and posterior segment causes (37%). Severe visual impairment was mainly due to cataract (43%) and refractive error (39%), and visual impairment was mainly due to refractive error (67%) and cataract (18%). Cataract surgical coverage by person at the level of <6/60 was 15%. CONCLUSIONS: The low prevalence of vision loss in this area with no eye services and a low cataract surgical coverage rate is surprising and possibly due to the effects of the previous years of conflict in which those with decreased vision may have been most likely to perish. If this explanation is correct, then Burundi needs to plan to deal with a markedly increasing prevalence of cataract in future.


Assuntos
Cegueira/epidemiologia , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Distribuição por Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Cegueira/etiologia , Burundi/epidemiologia , Catarata/complicações , Catarata/epidemiologia , Extração de Catarata/estatística & dados numéricos , Doenças da Córnea/complicações , Doenças da Córnea/epidemiologia , Feminino , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Erros de Refração/complicações , Erros de Refração/epidemiologia , Distribuição por Sexo , Baixa Visão/complicações , Baixa Visão/epidemiologia
6.
PLoS Med ; 4(7): e217, 2007 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17608561

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization estimates that there were 37 million blind people in 2002 and that the prevalence of blindness was 9% among adults in Africa aged 50 years or older. Recent surveys indicate that this figure may be overestimated, while a survey from southern Sudan suggested that postconflict areas are particularly vulnerable to blindness. The aim of this study was to conduct a Rapid Assessment for Avoidable Blindness to estimate the magnitude and causes of visual impairment in people aged > or = 50 y in the postconflict area of the Western Province of Rwanda, which includes one-quarter of the population of Rwanda. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Clusters of 50 people aged > or = 50 y were selected through probability proportionate to size sampling. Households within clusters were selected through compact segment sampling. Visual acuity (VA) was measured with a tumbling "E" chart, and those with VA below 6/18 in either eye were examined by an ophthalmologist. The teams examined 2,206 people (response rate 98.0%). The unadjusted prevalence of bilateral blindness was 1.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2%-2.4%), 1.3% (0.8%-1.7%) for severe visual impairment, and 5.3% (4.2%-6.4%) for visual impairment. Most bilateral blindness (65%) was due to cataract. Overall, the vast majority of cases of blindness (80.0%), severe visual impairment (67.9%), and visual impairment (87.2%) were avoidable (i.e.. due to cataract, refractive error, aphakia, trachoma, or corneal scar). The cataract surgical coverage was moderate; 47% of people with bilateral cataract blindness (VA < 3/60) had undergone surgery. Of the 29 eyes that had undergone cataract surgery, nine (31%) had a best-corrected poor outcome (i.e., VA < 6/60). Extrapolating these estimates to Rwanda's Western Province, among the people aged 50 years or above 2,565 are expected to be blind, 1,824 to have severe visual impairment, and 8,055 to have visual impairment. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of blindness and visual impairment in this postconflict area in the Western Province of Rwanda was far lower than expected. Most of the cases of blindness and visual impairment remain avoidable, however, suggesting that the implementation of an effective eye care service could reduce the prevalence further.


Assuntos
Cegueira/epidemiologia , Cegueira/prevenção & controle , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Cegueira/etiologia , Catarata/complicações , Doenças da Córnea/complicações , Feminino , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Erros de Refração/complicações , Ruanda/epidemiologia , Tracoma/complicações , Acuidade Visual
7.
Br J Ophthalmol ; 91(12): 1588-92, 2007 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17567662

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To conduct rapid assessments of avoidable blindness to estimate the magnitude and causes of blindness in people aged >/=50 years in Negros Island and Antique district, Philippines. METHODS: Clusters of 50 people aged >/=50 years were sampled with probability proportionate to size. Households within clusters were selected through compact segment sampling. Visual acuity (VA) was measured with a tumbling "E" chart. Ophthalmologists examined people with VA<6/18 in either eye. RESULTS: In Negros, 2774 of 3649 enumerated subjects were examined (76.0%) and 3177 of 3842 enumerated subjects in Antique (82.7%). The prevalence of blindness (presenting VA<3/60 in better eye) was 2.6% (95% CI = 2.0 to 3.2%) in Negros and 3.0% (2.4 to 3.6%) in Antique. The leading cause of blindness was untreated cataract, and was refractive error for visual impairment (VA<6/18 to >/=6/60). Most of the cases of blindness (67% in Negros, 82% in Antique) and visual impairment (94% in Negros, 95% in Antique) were avoidable (ie, operated and unoperated cataract, refractive error and corneal scar). In Negros, 23% of eyes had a poor outcome after cataract surgery, and 13% in Antique. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of blindness in two areas in the Philippines was relatively low. Since most cases were avoidable, further reductions are possible.


Assuntos
Cegueira/diagnóstico , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Oftalmológico , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Cegueira/epidemiologia , Cegueira/etiologia , Catarata/complicações , Extração de Catarata/normas , Cicatriz/complicações , Doenças da Córnea/complicações , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Filipinas , Prevalência , Erros de Refração/complicações , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Distribuição por Sexo , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Transtornos da Visão/epidemiologia , Transtornos da Visão/etiologia , Transtornos da Visão/fisiopatologia , Acuidade Visual
8.
Ophthalmology ; 114(3): 599-605, 2007 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17141319

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the prevalence of avoidable blindness in > or =50-year-olds in Nakuru district, Kenya, and to evaluate the Rapid Assessment for Avoidable Blindness (RAAB), a new methodology to measure the magnitude and causes of blindness. DESIGN: Cross-sectional population-based survey. PARTICIPANTS: Seventy-six clusters of 50 people 50 years or older were selected by probability proportionate to size sampling of clusters. Households within clusters were selected through compact segment sampling. Three thousand seven hundred eighty-four eligible subjects were selected, of whom 3503 (92.6%) were examined. METHODS: Participants underwent a comprehensive ophthalmic examination in their homes by an ophthalmologist, including measurement of visual acuity (VA) with a tumbling-E chart and the diagnosis of the principal cause of visual impairment. Those who had undergone cataract surgery were questioned about the details of the operation and their satisfaction with surgery. Those who were visually impaired from cataract were asked why they had not gone for surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Visual acuity and principal cause of VA<6/18. RESULTS: The prevalence of bilateral blindness (presenting VA < 3/60) was 2.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5%-2.4%), and prevalence of bilateral visual impairment (VA of <6/18-> or =6/60) was 5.8% (95% CI, 4.8%-6.8%) in the sample. Definite avoidable causes of blindness (i.e., cataract, refractive error, trachoma, and corneal scarring) were responsible for 69.6% of bilateral blindness and 74.9% of bilateral visual impairment. Cataract was the major cause of blindness (42.0%) and visual impairment (36.0%). The cataract surgical coverage was high, with 78% of those with bilateral cataract who needed surgery having had surgery at VA<3/60. The quality of surgery was of concern because 22% of the 222 eyes that had undergone cataract surgery had VA<6/60 with best correction. The main barriers to surgery were lack of awareness and cost. The RAAB methodology was easy to use, and each team could visit one cluster per day. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of blindness in > or =50-year-olds in Nakuru district was low, in part due to the high cataract surgical coverage. The RAAB is easy to use and inexpensive and provides information about the magnitude and causes of avoidable blindness that can be used for planning and monitoring eye care services.


Assuntos
Cegueira/epidemiologia , Métodos Epidemiológicos , Cegueira/etiologia , Catarata/complicações , Extração de Catarata/normas , Extração de Catarata/estatística & dados numéricos , Cicatriz/complicações , Doenças da Córnea/complicações , Estudos Transversais , Coleta de Dados/normas , Humanos , Quênia/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Erros de Refração/complicações , Tracoma/complicações , Transtornos da Visão/etiologia
9.
Am J Ophthalmol ; 128(1): 38-44, 1999 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10482092

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To validate the Visual Function-14 (VF-14) index of functional visual impairment in candidates for a corneal graft. METHODS: One hundred thirty-four patients who were candidates for a corneal graft participated in this study between August 1996 and February 1997. Demographic, ocular history, best-corrected visual acuity, and detailed ocular examination data were collected. Functional visual impairment information was obtained by telephone interviews using the following: VF-14, SF-36 (Short Form-36, a more generic measure of general health function), and Visual Symptom Score, and four questions measuring the overall amount of trouble with vision, dissatisfaction with vision, ocular pain, and discomfort. RESULTS: The average age of corneal graft candidates was 64 +/- 18 years (range, 18 to 90 years) and 60% were women. The most frequent corneal disease was pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (41%). Ocular comorbidities included glaucoma or ocular hypertension (30%) and cataract (19%). The mean best-corrected visual acuity of the eye scheduled for surgery was 1.33 +/- 0.56 logMAR whereas the best eye best-corrected visual acuity was 0.36 +/- 0.44 logMAR. The mean VF-14 score was 73% +/- 26%, and the internal consistency was high, with a Cronbach alpha value of 0.94. The VF-14 correlated strongly with the best eye best-corrected visual acuity. It also correlated strongly with the Visual Symptom Score, the global measures of trouble and dissatisfaction with vision. Candidates for a corneal graft had low scores for all eight general health concepts evaluated with the SF-36, and the VF-14 correlated with seven of the eight SF-36 subscales. CONCLUSION: The VF-14 is a valid measure of functional visual impairment in candidates for a corneal graft. The Visual Symptom Score and the SF-36 are also useful indices in such patients.


Assuntos
Doenças da Córnea/complicações , Transplante de Córnea , Nível de Saúde , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Acuidade Visual , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Catarata/complicações , Doenças da Córnea/fisiopatologia , Doenças da Córnea/cirurgia , Feminino , Glaucoma/complicações , Política de Saúde , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Qualidade de Vida , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Inquéritos e Questionários , Acuidade Visual/fisiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA