A targeted literature review of the burden of illness for spine-related neuropathic pain in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Neuropathic pain (NeP) is pain provoked by damage or disease in the nervous system and about one in three Japanese patients with spinal disorders are highly likely to have NeP. The humanistic and economic burden of illness (BOI) of spine-related NeP represents unmet medical needs that should be addressed. The purpose of this targeted literature review was to synthesize the available evidence on the BOI of spine-related NeP in Japanese patients. METHODS: PubMed and ICHUSHI were searched for relevant studies published between January 2010 and December 2020, in English or Japanese. The population included patients with one or more of prespecified spinal disorders and NeP, and outcomes of interest were data related to humanistic or economic burden. RESULTS: Out of 32 studies that assessed the BOI of spine-related disorders in Japan, only six specifically assessed spine-related NeP. Among these studies, five different validated questionnaires were used to measure humanistic burden. Spine-related NeP was consistently shown to be related with a poorer health-related quality of life and higher levels of anxiety and depression compared to the general population as well as patients with nociceptive pain. No articles directly evaluating economic burden were identified in this search, so an exploratory analysis was conducted. Reduction in work productivity by people experiencing spine-related NeP in the whole of Japan were estimated to total JPY 172,266,780,480 per year. CONCLUSIONS: The humanistic burden of spine-related NeP on Japanese patients is considerable, not only physically but also mentally. Exploratory analysis of the economic burden illustrates the possibility of substantial societal costs associated with NeP. In order to better understand the depth of BOI and the unmet medical need caused by spine-related NeP, further studies on real-world outcomes are recommended.

Influence of Osteoporosis Following Spine Surgery on Reoperation, Readmission, and Economic Costs: An 8-Year Nationwide Population-Based Study in Korea.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between prevalence of osteoporosis and risk factors, medical costs, reoperation, and readmission in patients after spine surgery. METHODS: Patients >50 years old with thoracic or lumbar spine diseases who underwent spine surgery between 2005 and 2008 were selected from the Korean National Health Insurance Service databases for analysis. There were 147,676 patients selected, who were divided into 2 groups (osteoporosis and non-osteoporosis) and followed for 8 years. Multiple logistic regressions were performed to examine the effect of osteoporosis following spine surgery. RESULTS: Patients with osteoporosis showed significant increases in readmission rates (odds ratio = 1.26, P < 0.001). Osteoporosis was found to be significantly associated with longer hospital stays and increased medical costs regardless of the cause of spine disease. For readmission, there was a 62-day difference in hospitalization time and U.S. dollars $2040 difference in medical costs between the osteoporosis group and non-osteoporosis group. Total medical costs of the osteoporosis group were about U.S. dollars $310 million more than total medical costs of the non-osteoporosis group. Osteoporosis increased the risk of reoperation in fusion surgery, particularly in the first 3 months postoperatively (odds ratio = 1.34, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Osteoporosis was significantly associated with higher readmission rates, longer hospitalization, and greater medical costs during the 8-year follow-up. It also increased the risk of reoperation in fusion surgery. Proper management of osteoporosis is essential before spine surgery, particularly fusion surgery, to help reduce patients' socioeconomic burden and produce more satisfactory surgical outcomes.

Cervical Spinal Fusion in Adult Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: A National Analysis of Complications and 90-day Readmissions.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to utilize the National Readmission Database to determine the national estimates of complication and 90-day readmission rates associated with cervical spinal fusion in adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND: RA patients who undergo cervical spine surgery are known to be at high risk for readmissions, which are costly and may not be reimbursed by Medicare. METHODS: The National Readmission Database was queried for adults (>18 years) diagnosed with RA undergoing cervical spine fusion. Patient, operative, and hospital factors were assessed in bivariate analyses. Independent risk factors for readmissions were identified using stepwise multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: From 2013 to 2014, a total of 5597 RA patients (average age: 61.5 ±â€Š11.2 years, 70.9% female) underwent cervical spine fusion. A total of 691 (12.3%) patients were readmitted within 90 days (). Index inpatient complications included dysphagia (readmitted: 7.9% vs. non-readmitted: 5.1%; P = 0.003), urinary tract infection (UTI) (8.8% vs. 3.7%; P < 0.001), respiratory-related complications (7.6% vs. 3.4%; P < 0.001), and implant-related complications (5.4% vs. 2.7%; P < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated the following as the strongest independent predictors for 90-day readmission: intraoperative bleeding (odds ratio [OR]: 3.6, P = 0.001), inpatient Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) (OR 4.1, P = 0.004), and patient discharge against medical advice (OR 33.5, P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Readmission rates for RA patients undergoing cervical spine surgery are high and most often due to postoperative infection (septicemia, UTI, pneumonia, wound). Potential modifiable factors which may improve outcomes include minimizing intraoperative blood loses, postoperative DVT prophylaxis, and discharge disposition. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Drivers of Prolonged Hospitalization Following Spine Surgery: A Game-Theory-Based Approach to Explaining Machine Learning Models.

BACKGROUND: Understanding the interactions between variables that predict prolonged hospital length of stay (LOS) following spine surgery can help uncover drivers of this risk in patients. This study utilized a novel game-theory-based approach to develop explainable machine learning models to understand such interactions in a large cohort of patients treated with spine surgery. METHODS: Of 11,150 patients who underwent surgery for degenerative spine conditions at a single institution, 3,310 (29.7%) were characterized as having prolonged LOS. Machine learning models predicting LOS were built for each patient. Shapley additive explanation (SHAP) values were calculated for each patient model to quantify the importance of features and variable interaction effects. RESULTS: Models using features identified by SHAP values were highly predictive of prolonged LOS risk (mean C-statistic = 0.87). Feature importance analysis revealed that prolonged LOS risk is multifactorial. Non-elective admission produced elevated SHAP values, indicating a clear, strong risk of prolonged LOS. In contrast, intraoperative and sociodemographic factors displayed bidirectional influences on risk, suggesting potential protective effects with optimization of factors such as estimated blood loss, surgical duration, and comorbidity burden. CONCLUSIONS: Meticulous management of patients with high comorbidity burdens or Medicaid insurance who are admitted non-electively or spend clinically indicated time in the intensive care unit (ICU) during their hospitalization course may be warranted to reduce their risk of unanticipated prolonged LOS following spine surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

A pain relieving reimbursement program? Effects of a value-based reimbursement program on patient reported outcome measures.

BACKGROUND: Value-based reimbursement programs have become increasingly common. However, little is known about the effect of such programs on patient reported outcomes. Thus, the aim of this study was to analyze the effect of introducing a value-based reimbursement program on patient reported outcome measures and to explore whether a selection bias towards less complicated patients occurred. METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study with a before and after design based on the introduction of a value-based reimbursement program in Region Stockholm, Sweden. We analyzed patient level data from inpatient and outpatient care of patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery during 2006-2015. Patient reported outcome measures used was Global Assessment, EQ-5D-3L and Oswestry Disability Index. The case-mix of surgically treated patients was analyzed using medical and socioeconomic factors. RESULTS: The value-based reimbursement program did not have any effect on targeted or non-targeted patient reported outcome measures. Moreover, the share of surgically treated patients with risk factors such as having comorbidities and being born outside of Europe increased after the introduction. Hence, the value-based reimbursement program did not encourage discrimination against sicker patients. However, the income was higher among patients surgically treated after the introduction of the value-based reimbursement. This indicates that a value-based reimbursement program may contribute to increased inequalities in access to healthcare. CONCLUSIONS: The value-based reimbursement program did not have any effect on patient reported outcome measures. Our study contributes to the understanding of the effects of a value-based reimbursement program on patient reported outcome measures and to what extent cherry-picking arises.

Evaluation criteria for the assessment of occupational diseases of the lumbar spine - how reliable are they?

BACKGROUND: In 2005, the German Association of Occupational Accident Insurance Funds (DGUV) defined radiological evaluation criteria for the assessment of degenerative occupational diseases of the lumbar spine. These include the measurement of intervertebral osteochondrosis and classification of vertebral osteosclerosis, antero-lateral and posterior spondylosis, and spondyloarthritis via plain radiography. The measures currently remain in daily use for determining worker compensation among those with occupational diseases. Here, we aimed to evaluate the inter- and intra-observer reliability of these evaluation criteria. METHODS: We enrolled 100 patients with occupational degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine. Native antero-posterior and lateral radiographs of these patients were evaluated according to DGUV recommendations by 4 observers with different levels of clinical training. Evaluations were again conducted after 2 months to assess the intra-observer reliability. RESULTS: The measurement of intervertebral osteochondrosis showed good inter-observer reliability (ICC: 0.755) and excellent intra-observer reliability (ICC: 0.827). The classification of vertebral osteosclerosis exhibited moderate kappa values for inter-observer reliability (К: 0.426) and intra-observer reliability (К: 0.441); the remaining 3 criteria showed poor inter- and intra-observer reliabilities. CONCLUSION: The measurement of intervertebral osteochondrosis and classification of vertebral osteosclerosis showed adequate inter- and intra-observer reliability in the assessment of occupational diseases of the lumbar spine, whereas the classification of antero-lateral and posterior spondylosis and spondyloarthritis stage exhibited insufficient reliability. Hence, we recommend the revision of the DGUV recommendations for the evaluation of occupational diseases of the lumbar spine.

The Impact of Comorbidity Burden on Complications, Length of Stay, and Direct Hospital Costs After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether comorbidity as determined by Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) is associated with inpatient complication rate, length of stay (LOS), or direct hospital costs after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: In the spine literature, comorbidity burden has been associated with an increased risk for complications, prolonged LOS, and greater hospital costs. Few studies have investigated the influence of comorbidity burden on these outcomes in minimally invasive spine surgery populations. METHODS: A prospectively maintained surgical registry of patients undergoing primary, single-level MIS-TLIF was retrospectively reviewed. Patients were stratified by CCI and tested for association with preoperative demographics and perioperative characteristics using Chi-squared analysis or one-way analysis of variance for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Complication rates, LOS, and direct hospital costs were compared between groups using a one-way analysis of variance. RESULTS: Two hundred ninety-eight patients were included. About 19.8% had a CCI of 0, 41.3% had a CCI of 1 to 2, 27.2% had a CCI of 3 to 4, and 11.7% had a CCI ≥ 5. Elevated CCI was associated with older age, smoking, and insurance status. Elevated CCI was significantly associated with a greater total inpatient complication rate. Regarding LOS and total direct hospital costs, there were no associations identified. However, elevated CCI was associated with greater costs accrued in the intensive care unit, laboratory costs, and cardiology-related costs. CONCLUSION: Greater comorbidity burden as reflected by higher CCI was associated with increased postoperative complication rates following primary, single-level MIS-TLIF. However, this did not lead to prolongations in hospital stay or increased total direct hospital costs. This lack of association may suggest that the limited tissue trauma and operative exposure utilized in minimally invasive approaches may limit the utility of CCI as a predictor of surgical outcomes and costs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Fibromyalgia as a Predictor of Increased Postoperative Complications, Readmission Rates, and Hospital Costs in Patients Undergoing Posterior Lumbar Spine Fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify whether a concomitant diagnosis of fibromyalgia (FM) influences postoperative complications, readmission rates or cost following primary 1 to 2 level lumbar fusions in an elective setting. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Patients with FM often are limited by chronic lower back pain, many of whom will seek operative treatment. No previous study has evaluated whether patients with a concomitant diagnosis of FM have more complications following spine surgery. METHODS: Medicare data (2005-2014) from a national database was queried for patients who underwent primary 1 to 2 level posterolateral lumbar spine fusion for degenerative lumbar pathology. Thirty- and 90-day postoperative complication rates, readmission rates, and treatment costs were queried. To reduce confounding, FM patients were matched with a control cohort of non-FM patients using patient demographics, treatment modality, and comorbid conditions, and then analyzed by multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Within the first 30-day postoperative, acute post hemorrhagic anemia (odds ratio [OR]: 2.58; P < 0.001) and readmission rates were significantly higher in FM patients compared to controls. There was no significant difference in wound related complications within first 30-days (0.19% vs. 0.23%; P = 0.520) or with length of stay (3.60 vs. 3.53 days; P = 0.08). Within 90-day postoperative, FM patients had higher rates of pneumonia (OR: 3.73; P < 0.001) and incurred 5.31% more in hospital charges reimbursed compared to the control cohort. CONCLUSION: Primary 1 to 2 level lumbar fusions performed on FM patients have higher rates of postoperative anemia, pneumonia, cost of care, and readmission compared to match controls. FM patients and surgeons should be aware of these increased risks in an effort to control hospital costs and potential complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

PROMIS PF CAT Outperforms the ODI and SF-36 Physical Function Domain in Spine Patients.

STUDY DESIGN: The Oswestry Disability Index v2.0 (ODI), SF36 Physical Function Domain (SF-36 PFD), and PROMIS Physical Function CAT v1.2 (PF CAT) questionnaires were prospectively collected from 1607 patients complaining of back or leg pain, visiting a university-based spine clinic. All questionnaires were collected electronically, using a tablet computer. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the psychometric properties of the PROMIS PF CAT with the ODI and SF36 Physical Function Domain in the same patient population. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Evidence-based decision-making is improved by using high-quality patient-reported outcomes measures. Prior studies have revealed the shortcomings of the ODI and SF36, commonly used in spine patients. The PROMIS Network has developed measures with excellent psychometric properties. The Physical Function domain, delivered by Computerized Adaptive Testing (PF CAT), performs well in the spine patient population, though to-date direct comparisons with common measures have not been performed. METHODS: Standard Rasch analysis was performed to directly compare the psychometrics of the PF CAT, ODI, and SF36 PFD. Spearman correlations were computed to examine the correlations of the three instruments. Time required for administration was also recorded. RESULTS: One thousand six hundred seven patients were administered all assessments. The time required to answer all items in the PF CAT, ODI, and SF-36 PFD was 44, 169, and 99 seconds. The ceiling and floor effects were excellent for the PF CAT (0.81%, 3.86%), while the ceiling effects were marginal and floor effects quite poor for the ODI (6.91% and 44.24%) and SF-36 PFD (5.97% and 23.65%). All instruments significantly correlated with each other. CONCLUSION: The PROMIS PF CAT outperforms the ODI and SF-36 PFD in the spine patient population and is highly correlated. It has better coverage, while taking less time to administer with fewer questions to answer. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.

Efficacy of MRI for assessment of spinal trauma: correlation with intraoperative findings.

STUDY DESIGN: Observational diagnostic study on consecutive patients. OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for detecting spinal soft tissue injury after acute trauma using intraoperative findings as a reference standard. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Recognizing injuries to spinal soft tissue structures is critical for proper decision making and management for blunt trauma victims. Although MRI is considered the gold standard for imaging of soft tissues, its ability to identify specific components of soft tissue damage in acute spine trauma patients is poorly documented and controversial. METHODS: Intraoperative findings were recorded for 21 acute spinal trauma patients (study group) and 14 nontraumatic spinal surgery patients (control group). Preoperative MRI's were evaluated randomly and blindly by 2 neuroradiologists. MRI and intraoperative findings were compared. By using the intraoperative findings as the reference standard, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of MRI in detecting spinal soft tissue injury were determined. RESULTS: MRI was 100% sensitive and specific in detecting injury to the anterior longitudinal ligament. MRI was moderately sensitive (80%) but highly specific (100%) for injury to the posterior longitudinal ligament. In contrast, MRI was highly sensitive but less specific in detecting injury to paraspinal muscles (100%, 77%), intervertebral disk (100%, 71%), and interspinous ligament (100%, 64%). MRI was moderately sensitive and specific in detecting ligamentum flavum injury (80% and 86.7%) but poorly sensitive for facet capsule injury (62.5%). CONCLUSIONS: MRI demonstrated high sensitivity for spinal soft tissue injuries. However, MRI showed a definite trend to overestimate interspinous ligament, intervertebral disk, and paraspinal muscle injuries. On the basis of these results, we would consider MRI to be a useful tool for spine clearance after trauma. Conversely, caution should be applied when using MRI for operative decision making due to its less predictable specificity.

The impact of diabetes mellitus on patients undergoing degenerative cervical spine surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective administrative database analysis. OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of glycemic control on perioperative complications and outcomes in patients undergoing degenerative cervical spine surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a highly prevalent systemic disease that has been shown to increase morbidity and mortality after spine surgery. Few studies have demonstrated negative effects on patients with DM who undergo cervical spine procedures; however, whether glycemic control influences surgical outcome is still unknown. METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was queried from 2002 to 2011. Patients who underwent cervical spine surgery for degenerative conditions were identified using the International Classification of Diseases Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification, codes. Three surgical cohorts were chosen: controlled diabetic, uncontrolled diabetic, and patients without diabetes. Patient demographics, surgical procedures, perioperative complications and postoperative outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: The prevalence of controlled and uncontrolled diabetic patients undergoing degenerative cervical spine surgery had been increasing significantly from 2002 to 2011. Compared with patients without diabetes, uncontrolled diabetic patients had significantly increased odds of respiratory, cardiac, and genitourinary complications. Uncontrolled diabetic patients also had significantly increased risk of pulmonary embolism and postoperative infection. Uncontrolled diabetic patients had increased risk of inpatient mortality (odds ratio = 6.39, 95% confidence interval = 4.09-10.00, P < 0.0001) and increased mean length of stay (almost 5 d) compared with nondiabetic patients. Similarly, controlled diabetic patients increased the odds of perioperative complications; however not nearly to the same degree. Controlled diabetic patients extended the mean length of stay by almost a day (P < 0.0001) and significantly increased costs compared with nondiabetic patients. CONCLUSION: Poor glycemic control increases the odds of inpatient mortality and perioperative complications in patients undergoing degenerative cervical spine surgery. Controlling DM before degenerative cervical spine surgery may lead to better outcomes and decreased costs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level 3.

Impact of IT-enabled intervention on MRI use for back pain.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of a multifaceted, clinical decision support (CDS)-enabled intervention on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) use in adult primary care patients with low back pain. METHODS: After a baseline observation period, we implemented a CDS targeting lumbar-spine MRI use in primary care patients with low back pain through our computerized physician order entry, as well as 2 accountability tools: mandatory peer-to-peer consultation when test utility was uncertain and quarterly practice pattern variation reports to providers. Our primary outcome measure was rate of lumbar-spine MRI use. Secondary measures included utilization of MRI of any body part, comparing it with that of a concurrent national comparison, as well as proportion of lumbar-spine MRI performed in the study cohort that was adherent to evidence-based guideline. Chi-squared, t-tests, and logistic regression were used to assess pre- and postintervention differences. RESULTS: In the study cohort preintervention, 5.3% of low back pain-related primary care visits resulted in lumbar-spine MRI, compared with 3.7% of visits postintervention (P <.0001, adjusted odds ratio 0.68). There was a 30.8% relative decrease (6.5% vs 4.5%, P <.0001, adjusted odds ratio 0.67) in the use of MRI of any body part by the primary care providers in the study cohort. This difference was not detected in the control cohort (5.6% vs 5.3%, P = .712). In the study cohort, adherence to evidence-based guideline in the use of lumbar-spine MRI increased from 78% to 96% (P = .0002). CONCLUSIONS: CDS and associated accountability tools may reduce potentially inappropriate imaging in patients with low back pain.

Anterior and posterior cervical fusion in patients with high body mass index are not associated with greater complications.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Obesity has been associated with adverse surgical outcomes; however, limited information is available regarding the effect of obesity on cervical spinal fusion outcomes. PURPOSE: To determine the effect of obesity on complication rates after cervical fusions. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective cohort analysis of prospectively collected data on cervical fusion surgeries. PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients in the ACS-NSQIP database from 2005 to 2010 undergoing cervical anterior or posterior fusion. OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome measures were 30-day postsurgical complications, including mortality, deep-vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, septic complications, system-specific complications, and having ≥1 complication overall. Secondary outcomes were time spent in the operating room, blood transfusions, length of stay, and reoperation within 30 days. METHODS: Patients undergoing anterior or posterior cervical fusions in the 2005-2010 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program were selected using Current Procedural Terminology codes. Anterior cervical fusion patients were categorized into four groups on the basis of body mass index (BMI): nonobese (18.5-29.9 kg/m(2)), obese I (30-34.9 kg/m(2)), obese II (35-39.9 kg/m(2)), and obese III (≥40 kg/m(2)). Posterior cervical patients were categorized into two groups based on the basis of BMI: nonobese (18.5-29.9 kg/m(2)) and obese (≥30 kg/m(2)) due to the smaller sample size. Patients in the obese categories were compared with patients in the nonobese categories by the use of χ(2), Fisher's exact test, Student t test, and analysis of variance. Multivariate linear/logistic regression models were used to adjust for preoperative comorbidities. The authors report no sources of funding or conflicts of interest related to this study. RESULTS: Data were available for 3,671 and 400 patients who underwent anterior or posterior cervical fusion, respectively. Obese class III patients only showed a greater incidence of deep-vein thrombosis after anterior fusions on univariate analysis. Obese patients only showed longer mean surgical times and total operating room times after posterior fusions on univariate analysis. On multivariate analyses, these differences did not remain significant. There were also no differences in multivariate analyses for overall and system-specific complication rates, lengths of hospital stay, reoperation rates, and mortality among the obesity groups when compared with the nonobese groups with anterior or posterior cervical fusions. CONCLUSIONS: High BMI, regardless of obesity class, does not appear to be associated with increased complications after cervical fusion in the 30-day postoperative period.

Growth of spinal interventional pain management techniques: analysis of utilization trends and Medicare expenditures 2000 to 2008.

STUDY DESIGN: Analysis of the growth, utilization trends, and Medicare expenditures of spinal interventional pain management techniques from 2000 through 2008. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of epidural steroid injections, facet joint interventions, and sacroiliac joint interventions, and to analyze the trends of Medicare utilization and expenditures in multiple settings-namely, hospital outpatient departments, ambulatory surgery centers, and physician offices. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There has been an explosive growth of many invasive and noninvasive modalities designed to manage chronic spinal pain. Commonly used interventional techniques include epidural steroid injections, facet joint interventions, and sacroiliac joint interventions. However, their effectiveness and the appropriateness of their application continue to be debated. METHODS: The present article provides an analysis of the growth of spinal interventional techniques, as described earlier, for managing the chronic spinal pain of Medicare beneficiaries from 2000 through 2008. The standard 5% national sample of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services carrier claims that record data from 2000 through 2008 were utilized. Current procedural terminology codes from 2000 through 2008 were used to identify the number of procedures performed each year, as well as trends and expenditures. RESULTS: Medicare recipients receiving spinal interventional techniques increased 107.8% from 2000 through 2008, with an annual average increase of 9.6%, whereas spinal interventional techniques increased 186.8%, an annual average increase of 14.1% per 100,000 beneficiaries. CONCLUSION: The study suggests explosive increases in spinal interventional techniques from 2000 to 2008, with some slowing of growth in later years.

Retrolisthesis and lumbar disc herniation: a postoperative assessment of patient function.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The presence of retrolisthesis has been associated with the degenerative changes of the lumbar spine. However, retrolisthesis in patients with L5-S1 disc herniation has not been shown to have a significant relationship with worse baseline pain or function. Whether it can affect the outcomes after discectomy, is yet to be established. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between retrolisthesis (alone or in combination with other degenerative conditions) and postoperative low back pain, physical function, and quality of life. This study was intended to be a follow-up to a previous investigation that looked at the preoperative assessment of patient function in those with retrolisthesis and lumbar disc herniation. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients enrolled in SPORT (Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial) who had undergone L5-S1 discectomy and had a complete magnetic resonance imaging scan available for review (n=125). Individuals with anterolisthesis were excluded. OUTCOME MEASURES: Time-weighted averages over 4 years for the Short Form (SF)-36 bodily pain scale, SF-36 physical function scale, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Sciatica Bothersomeness Index (SBI). METHODS: Retrolisthesis was defined as a posterior subluxation of 8% or more. Disc degeneration was defined as any loss of disc signal on T2 imaging. Modic changes were graded 1 to 3 and collectively classified as vertebral end plate degenerative changes. The presence of facet arthropathy and ligamentum flavum hypertrophy was classified jointly as posterior degenerative changes. Longitudinal regression models were used to compare the time-weighted outcomes over 4 years. RESULTS: Patients with retrolisthesis did significantly worse with regard to bodily pain and physical function over 4 years. However, there were no significant differences in terms of ODI or SBI. Similarly, retrolisthesis was not a significant factor in the operative time, blood loss, lengths of stay, complications, rate of additional spine surgeries, or recurrent disc herniations. Disc degeneration, modic changes, and posterior degenerative changes did not affect the outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Although retrolisthesis in patients with L5-S1 disc herniation did not affect the baseline pain or function, postoperative outcomes appeared to be somewhat worse. It is possible that the contribution of pain or dysfunction related to retrolisthesis became more evident after removal of the disc herniation.

Advancements in the management of spine disorders.

Spinal disorders and especially back and neck pain affect more people and have greater impact on work capacity and health-care costs than any other musculoskeletal condition. One of the difficulties in reducing the burden of spinal disorders is the wide and heterogeneous range of specific diseases and non-specific musculoskeletal disorders that can involve the spinal column, most of which manifest as pain. Despite, or perhaps because of its impact, spinal disorders remain one of the most controversial and difficult conditions for clinicians, patients and policymakers to manage. This paper provides a brief summary of advances in the understanding of back and neck pain over the past decade as evidenced in the current literature. This paper includes the following sections: a classification of spinal disorders; the epidemiology of spine pain in the developed and developing world; key advancements in biological and biomechanical sciences in spine pain; the current status of potential methods for the prevention of back and neck pain; rheumatological and systemic disorders that impact the spine; and evidence-based surgical and non-surgical management of spine pain. The final section of this paper looks to the future and proposes actions and strategies that may be considered by the international Bone and Joint Decade (BJD), by providers, institutions and by policymakers so that we may better address the burden of spine disorders at global and local levels.

Appropriate use of lumbar imaging for evaluation of low back pain.

Use of lumbar spine imaging, particularly advanced imaging, continues to grow rapidly in the United States. Many lumbar spine imaging tests are obtained in patients who have no clinical symptoms or risk factors suggesting a serious underlying condition, yet evidence shows that this routine imaging is not associated with benefits, exposes patients to unnecessary harms, and increases costs. This article reviews current trends and practice patterns in lumbar spine imaging, direct and downstream costs, benefits and harms, current recommendations, and potential strategies for reducing imaging overuse.

[Direct cost of spinal cord injuries]. / Costo directo de las lesiones en la columna.

BACKGROUND: High prevalence and high costs in the treatment of spine injuries make a cost study necessary. The objective of this paper is to analyze, from the economic point of view, the behavior of traumatic and non-traumatic spinal pathologies in relation to hospital stay. METHODS: Analysis of economic cost per hospital stay (January 2000 to May 2010). RESULTS: 4,173 cases studied, 45% women and 55% men, predominantly elderly and a mean age of 48.9, standard deviation 16.8 years, with a notable increase in hospital expenses in prevalence and peak months: January, February and April; and a decrease in July, October and December. Total expenses for hospital stay were estimated as $85,565,288.00. Traumatic entities consumed $40,404,477.00, and degenerative $21,866,815.00. The months of highest spending were: April, $11,072,683.00, December, $8,423,773.00 and February $8,154,152.00; whereas July showed the lowest spending: $4,874,261.00. Inflation up to July 2011 remained at 3.55% on average, down 2.98 percentage points from 2008 figures. DISCUSSION: there is a clear increase in spending connected with spine condition treatment at hospitals, in particular those resulting from traumatic events. The definition of risk groups for preventive measures is also reflected in the spending records. Spending on hospital treatment of spinal conditions of the elderly reflects an increment in degenerative conditions. CONCLUSION: It is necessary to plan a timely resource distribution by month and year in order to achieve a better and more efficient scheme for health services. The epidemiological basis for the reorientation of the current models is now clear.

Patients' experience post-lumbar fusion regarding back problems, recovery and expectations in terms of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health.

PURPOSE: To describe within the context of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), patient's experiences post-lumber fusion regarding back problems, recovery and expectations of rehabilitation and to contrast with the content of outcome measures and the ICF low back pain (LBP) core sets. METHODS: The study has a cross-sectional and retrospective design and involves 20 lumbar fusion patients. Using the ICF, qualitative content analysis of semi-structured interviews 3-6 months post-surgery was performed. This was compared with the ICF related content of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Medical Outcome Study Short Form 36 (SF-36), European Quality of Life Questionnaire (EQ5D) and the ICF LBP core sets. RESULTS: Patient's experiences were most frequently linked to psychological, sensory, neuromusculoskeletal and movement related body function chapters of the ICF. The most frequently linked categories of activity and participation were mobility, domestic activities, family relationships, work, recreation and leisure. Environmental factors frequently linked were the use of analgesics, walking aids, family support, social security systems, health care systems and labour market employment services. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights important ICF related aspects of patient's experiences post-lumber fusion. The use of the comprehensive ICF core sets is recommended in conjunction with ODI, SF-36 and the EQ5D for a broader analysis of patient outcomes post-lumbar fusion.