Profiles of Pain Acceptance and Values-Based Action in the Assessment and Treatment of Chronic Pain.

Pain acceptance and values-based action are relevant to treatment outcomes in those with chronic pain. It is unclear if patterns of responding in these 2 behavioral processes can be used to classify patients into distinct classes at treatment onset and used to predict treatment response. This observational cohort study had 2 distinct goals. First, it sought to classify patients at assessment based on pain acceptance and values-based action (N = 1746). Second, it sought to examine treatment outcomes based on class membership in a sub-set of patients completing an interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation program of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for chronic pain (N = 343). Latent profile analysis was used in the larger sample to identify 3 distinct patient classes: low acceptance and values-based (AV) action (Low AV; n = 424), moderate acceptance and values-based action (Moderate AV; n = 983) and high acceptance and values-based action (High AV; n = 339). In the smaller treated sample, participants in the Low AV and Moderate AV class demonstrated improvements across all outcome variables, whereas those in the High AV class did not. These findings support the role of pain acceptance and values-based action in those with chronic pain. PERSPECTIVE: Individuals with chronic pain can be classified with respect to pain acceptance and values-based action and these groups may respond differently to treatment.

Assessment of the responsiveness of four scales in geriatric patients with chronic neck pain.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the responsiveness of Copenhagen Neck Functional Disability Scale (CNFDS), Neck Disability Index (NDI), Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire (NBQ), Neck Pain and Disability Scale (NPDS) in geriatric patients with non-specific chronic neck pain. A total of 52 geriatric patients with non-specific chronic neck pain were included in the present study. All participants were included in a physical therapy and rehabilitation program for five sessions per week that lasted 3 weeks. All participants were evaluated before and after the treatment. Pain and disability were assessed with the Visual Analog Scale-pain (VAS-pain), VAS-disability, muscle spasm, CNFDS, NDI, NBQ, NPDS scales. Additionally, patient satisfaction scores were questioned both before and after the treatment. Following the 3-week physical therapy and rehabilitation program, significant improvements were detected in the VAS-pain, VAS-disability, muscle spasm, CNFDS, NDI, NBQ, and NPDS scores (p < 0.05). Responsiveness values were found to be as follows: CNFDS [effect size (ES) = 0.78; standardized response mean (SRM) = 0.90], NDI (ES = 0.66; SRM = 1.18), NBQ (ES = 0.82; SRM = 0.97) and NPDS (ES = 0.87; SRM = 0.98). Our study demonstrated that CNFDS, NDI, NBQ, and NPDS are responsive scales in determining treatment-related changes in geriatric patients with non-specific neck pain. These results also suggest that all of these four scales can be used in the assessment of treatment induced changes in geriatric patients with chronic neck pain.

Telerehabilitation for Pain Management.

Telerehabilitation for pain management uses communication technology to minimize geographic barriers. Access to such technology has proven critically important during the coronavirus disease-2019 pandemic and has been useful for patients with chronic pain disorders unable to travel. The evaluation and treatment of such disorders requires a whole health approach that individualizes treatment options and delivers care through a biopsychosocial approach. The goals of care are unchanged from an in-person patient-provider experience. Telerehabilitation can be successfully implemented in pain management with appropriate consideration for staging an evaluation, a structured approach to the visit, and application of standard clinical metrics.

Predictors of Sickness Absence in a Clinical Population With Chronic Pain.

Chronic pain-related sickness absence is an enormous socioeconomic burden globally. Optimized interventions are reliant on a lucid understanding of the distribution of social insurance benefits and their predictors. This register-based observational study analyzed data for a 7-year period from a population-representative sample of 44,241 chronic pain patients eligible for interdisciplinary treatment (IDT) at specialist clinics. Sequence analysis was used to describe the sickness absence over the complete period and to separate the patients into subgroups based on their social insurance benefits over the final 2 years. The predictive performance of features from various domains was then explored with machine learning-based modeling in a nested cross-validation procedure. Our results showed that patients on sickness absence increased from 17% 5 years before to 48% at the time of the IDT assessment, and then decreased to 38% at the end of follow-up. Patients were divided into 3 classes characterized by low sickness absence, sick leave, and disability pension, with eight predictors of class membership being identified. Sickness absence history was the strongest predictor of future sickness absence, while other predictors included a 2008 policy, age, confidence in recovery, and geographical location. Information on these features could guide personalized intervention in the specialized healthcare. PERSPECTIVE: This study describes sickness absence in patients who visited a Swedish pain specialist interdisciplinary treatment clinic during the period 2005 to 2016. Predictors of future sickness absence are also identified that should be considered when adapting IDT programs to the patient's needs.

The (cost-)effectiveness and cost-utility of a novel integrative care initiative for patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain: the pragmatic trial protocol of Network Pain Rehabilitation Limburg.

BACKGROUND: Rehabilitation care for patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP) is not optimally organized. The Network Pain Rehabilitation Limburg 2.0 (NPRL2.0) provides integrated care with a biopsychosocial approach and strives to improve the Quadruple Aim outcomes: pain-related disability of patients with CMP; experiences of care of patients with CMP; meaning in the work of healthcare professionals; and healthcare costs. Firstly, in this study, the effectiveness (with regard to the functioning and participation of patients) of primary care for patients with CMP will be assessed, comparing care organized following the NPRL2.0 procedure with usual care. Secondly, the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility with regard to health-related quality of life and healthcare costs will be assessed. And thirdly, the effect of duration of participation in a local network in primary care will be studied. METHODS: In this pragmatic study, it is expected that two local networks with 105 patients will participate in the prospective cohort study and six local networks with 184 patients in the stepped-wedge based design. Healthcare professionals in the local networks will recruit patients. INCLUSION CRITERIA: age ≥ 18 years; having CMP; willing to improve functioning despite pain; and adequate Dutch literacy. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: pregnancy; and having a treatable medical or psychiatric disease. Patients will complete questionnaires at baseline (T1), 3 months (T2), 6 months (T3), and 9 months (T4). Questionnaires at T1 and T4 will include the Pain Disability Index and Short Form Health Survey. Questionnaires at T1, T2, T3, and T4 will include the EQ-5D-5L, and iMTA Medical Consumption and Productivity Cost Questionnaires. Outcomes will be compared using linear mixed-model analysis and costs will be compared using bootstrapping methods. DISCUSSION: NPRL2.0 is a multidimensional, complex intervention, executed in daily practice, and therefore needing a pragmatic study design. The current study will assess NPRL2.0 with respect to the Quadruple Aim outcomes: patient health and costs. This will provide more information on the (cost-) effectiveness of the organization of care in a network structure regarding patients with CMP. The other two Quadruple Aim outcomes will be examined alongside this study. Trial registration Netherlands Trial Register: NL7643. https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/7643 .

[Influence of Social Status on the Success of Rehabilitation among Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain - Results of a 2-year Follow-up after Inpatient Multidisciplinary Rehabilitation]. / Der Einfluss der sozialen Lage auf den Rehabilitationserfolg von Rehabilitanden mit chronischem Rückenschmerz.

PURPOSE: Social inequality in medical rehabilitation is receiving increasing attention. The present study examined the impact of the social status on the long-term effectiveness of the pain competence and depression prevention training "Debora" among patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) in an inpatient multidisciplinary rehabilitation. METHODS: The control group study with cluster-block randomization investigated the long-term changes in pain self-efficacy, psychological burden, functional capacity, and subjective work ability among 394 patients with non-specific CLBP depending on the condition (control group, CG: pain competence training vs. intervention group, IG: additional depression prevention training) and the social status (lower, middle vs. upper class; according to Deck [1]). The data were collected at five sample points: pre (t0), post (t1), 6-(t2), 12-(t3) and 24-month follow-up (t4). Multi- or univariate repeated-measures analyses of variance were conducted per protocol (pp). In a second step, results should be confirmed by multiple imputations (MI; N=1089). RESULTS: In general, patients of the lower class showed significantly worse values in depressive symptoms, functional capacity, and subjective work ability compared to the upper class. In addition, positive long-term effects could not be found among patients of the lower class. In contrast, patients of the middle and upper class improved, especially in the IG. Furthermore, only the IG showed long-term improvements in subjective work capacity. CONCLUSION: This study confirms the influence of the social status on the psychophysical health. Moreover, social inequality in long-term success of rehabilitation of CLBP was suggested, which could be mediated by health literacy. Therefore, these aspects should be taken into account already in the conception and especially in the application of psychological group trainings in inpatient rehabilitation.

Minimal clinically important difference and minimal detectable change of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) amongst patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to estimate a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and a minimal detectable change (MDC) of the 12-item WHODAS 2.0 amongst patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. DESIGN: Cross-sectional cohort study. SETTING: Outpatient Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine clinic. SUBJECTS: A total of 1988 consecutive patients with musculoskeletal pain. INTERVENTIONS: A distribution-based approach was employed to estimate a minimal clinically important difference, a minimal detectable change, and a minimal detectable percent change (MDC%). RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 48 years, and 65% were women. The average intensity of pain was 6,3 (2.0) points (0-10 numeric rating scale) and the mean WHODAS 2.0 total score was 13 (9) points out of 48. The minimal clinically important difference ranged between 3.1 and 4.7 points. The minimal detectable change was 8.6 points and minimal detectable % change was unacceptably high 66%. CONCLUSIONS: Amongst patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain, the 12-item WHODAS 2.0 demonstrated a high minimal detectable change of almost nine points. As the minimal detectable change exceeded the level of minimal clinically important difference, nine points were considered to be the amount of change perceived by a respondent as clinically significant.

A pragmatic randomized controlled trial testing the effects of the international scientific SCI exercise guidelines on SCI chronic pain: protocol for the EPIC-SCI trial.

STUDY DESIGN: Protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial (the Exercise guideline Promotion and Implementation in Chronic SCI [EPIC-SCI] Trial). PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: To test if home-/community-based exercise, prescribed according to the international SCI exercise guidelines, significantly reduces chronic bodily pain in adults with SCI. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: To investigate: (1) the effects of exercise on musculoskeletal and neuropathic chronic pain; (2) if reduced inflammation and increased descending inhibitory control are viable pathways by which exercise reduces pain; (3) the effects of chronic pain reductions on subjective well-being; and (4) efficiency of a home-/community-based exercise intervention. SETTING: Exercise in home-/community-based settings; assessments in university-based laboratories in British Columbia, Canada. METHOD: Eighty-four adults with chronic SCI, reporting chronic musculoskeletal or neuropathic pain, and not meeting the current SCI exercise guidelines, will be recruited and randomized to a 6-month Exercise or Wait-List Control condition. Exercise will occur in home/community settings and will be supported through behavioral counseling. All measures will be taken at baseline, 3-months and 6-months. Analyses will consist of linear mixed effect models, multiple regression analyses and a cost-utility analysis. The economic evaluation will examine the incremental costs and health benefits generated by the intervention compared with usual care. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The University of British Columbia Clinical Research Ethics Board approved the protocol (#H19-01650). Using an integrated knowledge translation approach, stakeholders will be engaged throughout the trial and will co-create and disseminate evidence-based recommendations and messages regarding the use of exercise to manage SCI chronic pain.

Assessment of the Level of Pain Intensity and the Level of Anxiety Treated as State and Trait in Patients with Osteoarthritis of the Limbs.

Introduction: Osteoarthritis of the musculoskeletal system is accompanied with chronic pain which is the main factor in mood lowering, causing anxiety. Rehabilitation conducted in the framework of spa therapy and outpatient care aims at eliminating or reducing pain and improving physical fitness. Pain relief is an expected phenomenon because it improves the quality of life. Aim of the study. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of rehabilitation in the spa and in outpatient clinic on the level of pain and anxiety in patients with degenerative joints and disc disease. Material and methods. The study included a comprehensive treatment conducted in the spa and in outpatient clinic. Observation included 120 persons with disorders of the musculoskeletal system treated in the spa Przerzeczyn-Zdrój. The second group of patients was treated in the rehabilitation clinic. The examinations were performed before and after treatment. The scope of the observations included self-evaluation of anxiety treated as a state and a trait, the level of intensity of pain, medical history, and sociodemographic background interview. In the observations, there were VAS scale and State Trait Anxiety Inventory STAI used. Result: As a result of the spa therapy and therapy performed in an outpatient clinic, there was an improvement in lowering the level of pain and anxiety noted. Conclusions: 1. Spa therapy and treatment performed in an outpatient clinic reduce the level of pain and anxiety in patients with degenerative disease of the musculoskeletal system. 2. It was found that the therapy conducted in the spa was more effective in lowering the level of pain and anxiety. This trial is registered with NCT03405350.

Chronic Pain Self-Management Support With Pain Science Education and Exercise (COMMENCE) for People With Chronic Pain and Multiple Comorbidities: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness of chronic pain self-management support with pain science education and exercise (COMMENCE) on improving function, pain interference, work status, pain intensity, fatigue, psychological factors associated with pain, health care visits, satisfaction, and perceived change compared with usual care. DESIGN: Parallel group randomized controlled trial with 1- and 12-week follow-ups. SETTING: Community health center. PARTICIPANTS: Adults (N=102) with chronic noncancer pain referred for self-management support. Eighty of 102 participants completed 12-week follow-up assessments. No participants withdrew with adverse events. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomized to COMMENCE or usual care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary: Function measured using the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment-Dysfunction Index. Secondary: Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment-Bother Index, Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System pain interference, work status, numeric pain, and fatigue rating scales, Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Pain Self-Efficacy Scale, Neurophysiology of Pain Questionnaire, number of health care visits, satisfaction, and global rating of change. RESULTS: COMMENCE resulted in greater improvements in function (mean difference [MD] at 12-wk follow-up=-8.0; 95% CI, -14.7 to -1.3), bother with functional difficulties (MD, -12.0; 95% CI, -20.8 to -3.2), pain intensity (MD, -1.0; 95% CI, -2.1 to -0.1), catastrophizing (MD , -8.2; 95% CI, -14.5 to -2.0), self-efficacy (MD, 7.0; 95% CI, 0.8-13.2), knowledge (MD, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.6-3.9), satisfaction (MD, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.7-1.8), and perceived change (MD, 1.4; 95% CI, 0.8-2.1). There were no significant between-group differences in pain interference, work, fatigue, depressive symptoms, or health care visits. CONCLUSION: COMMENCE is more effective than usual care at improving function, pain, catastrophic thinking, self-efficacy, pain knowledge, satisfaction, and perceived change but not pain interference, work status, fatigue, depressive symptoms, or health care visits.

Assessment of movement coordination strategies to inform health of movement and guide retraining interventions.

INTRODUCTION: Exploring characteristics of human movement has long been the focus of clinicians and researchers. Changes in movement coordination strategies have been identified in the presence of pain highlighting the need for assessment in clinical practice. A major development in the understanding of movement related disorders is recognition of individual differences in presentation and consequently the need to tailor interventions based on assessment. PURPOSE: The purpose of this masterclass is to build a rationale for the clinical assessment of movement coordination strategies, exploring loss of movement choices, coordination variability, and to present a clinical framework for individualised management, including the use of cognitive movement control tests and retraining interventions. An approach for the qualitative rating of movement coordination strategies is presented. A compromised movement system may be one characterised by a lack of ability to access motor abundance and display choice in the use of movement coordination strategies. The identification of lost movement choices revealed during the assessment of movement coordination strategies is proposed as a marker of movement health. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The health of the movement system may be informed by the ability to display choice in movement coordination strategies. There is evidence that restoring these choices has clinical utility and an influence on pain and improved function. This approach seeks to provide individuals with more flexible problem solving, enabled through a movement system that is robust to each unique challenge of function. This assessment framework sits within a bigger clinical reasoning picture for sustained quality of life.

A tool to improve functional outcome assessment of a multimodal program for patients with chronic low back pain: A study on walk tests (at comfortable and fast speed).

BACKGROUND: Tools for functional assessment of chronic low back pain (LBP) are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To determine the correlations and the responsiveness of the 400 m comfortable walk test (400 mCWT) and the 200 m fast-walk test (200 mFWT) in the functional assessment of a multimodal program. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-seven participants (68 females) with LBP and with or without radicular pain completed a Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale, a Sorensen test, a Shirado test, a 400 mCWT and a 200 mFWT, at baseline and at the end of the program. RESULTS: No significant side effect was reported during walk tests. Walking speed was significantly increased after the program (0.18 ± 0.15 m.s-1 for the 400 mCWT and 0.17 ± 0.17 m.s-1 for the 200 mFWT). Clinical parameters were also significantly improved (82.02 ± 83.1 seconds for the Shirado, 92.1 ± 100.1 seconds for the Sorensen, -14.0 ± 12.9 for the Quebec scale). A significant relationship was found between the increase in walking speed for the two walk tests and the improvement of the Quebec scale. The gait speed improvement was close to the minimal clinically important change (95% confidence interval: 0.14-0.22) determined from the Quebec scale threshold (minimum detectable change). CONCLUSIONS: Both 400 mCWT and 200 mFWT are correlated with functional parameters and are responsive for the functional assessment of LBP.

Dosage of pain rehabilitation programmes for patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain: a non-inferiority randomised controlled trial.

Purpose: To analyse the effects of interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation programmes with different dosages; care as usual versus short form.Methods: A single blinded, two armed, randomised controlled trial, with non-inferiority design was performed. All patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain referred to an outpatient multidisciplinary pain rehabilitation programme were eligible for this study. Only dosage differed, content was similar. The difference on Pain Disability Index was the primary outcome measure. Four points difference on Pain Disability Index was applied as a non-inferiority margin. Treatment effects within groups were expressed in standardised mean difference and effect sizes were calculated between the groups.Results: Because care as usual was frequently extended, the difference in dosage between groups was limited. The study was stopped prematurely because of an a-priori stopping rule. Interim analyses are presented. Both groups (care as usual n = 58, short form n = 54) improved significantly (mean Pain Disability Index change care as usual: -10.8; short form: -8.3). Mean difference between groups was 2.5 points (95% confidence interval was -2.2 to 7.3). Effect size between groups was 0.2.Conclusions: The 95% confidence interval for the difference in mean pain disability reduction exceeded the upper limit of the non-inferiority margin. The results of the primary analyses of this trial are, therefore, inconclusive. Ancillary analyses revealed that programme dosage was not associated with differences in the disability outcomes. Implications for rehabilitationOptimum dosage of interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation programs is unknown and scarcely studied. This study is the first to analyse dosage as primary aim.Although results are inconclusive, they also suggest that differences in dosage may not automatically lead to differences in effects.Further research is needed to analyse what dosage works for whom; to detect optimum effective and cost-effective dosage of pain rehabilitation programmes.

[Economic evaluation of interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation. One IKR for rehabilitation gives eight IKR back to society].

INTRODUCTION: There is limited research on the long-term benefits of an interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation, even though short-term benefits have been well documented. The present study evaluated the effects of an interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation program with a three-year follow-up. A special emphasis was placed on economic evaluation of the treatment from a societal perspective. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was conducted at the chronic pain unit of the Reykjalundur rehabilitation center. Every fifth patient referred to the Reykjalundur Rehabiliation Center pain clinic was randomized to participate in this study. Data was collected over the course of 4,5 years with a three years follow-up. Finally, economic evaluation was conducted at the end of the research. RESULTS: After treatment patients experienced less pain, fear and avoidance, anxiety and depression symptoms and improved social functioning. Work ability increased from 36% to 47% at the end of rehabilitation and continued to rise to 57% at three year follow-up. Economic evaluation from a societal perspective showed that cost associated with the rehabilitation had leveled out in three years and continued throughout life. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that interdisciplinary rehabilitation for chronic pain has a positive impact on function and the experience of pain as well as positive psychosocial effect. An economic evaluation of the treatment shows that the rehabilitation is very cost effective and that each Icelandic krona (IKR) spent is returned eightfold back to society.

Multiprofessional assessment of patients with chronic pain in primary healthcare.

Background and aims Chronic pain is a common reason to seek health care. Multimodal rehabilitation is frequently used to rehabilitate patients with complex pain conditions. The multiprofessional assessment that patients go through before entering multimodal rehabilitation may, in itself, have a positive impact on patient outcome but little is known regarding patients own view. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to discover how patients experienced this multiprofessional assessment project. Methods Ten patients participating in a multiprofessional assessment at a primary healthcare centre in Western Finland were interviewed using a semi-structured interview. Qualitative content analysis was used to analyse the interviews. Results The analysis resulted in six categories of participant description of their multiprofessional assessment experiences and the rehabilitation plan they received. Feeling chosen or not quite fitting in was a category describing participant feelings upon starting the assessment. They expressed their thoughts on the examinations in the category more than just an examination. Being affirmed described participant desire to be taken seriously and treated well. Receiving support described the perceived roles of the team members. Participant negative experiences of the assessment were described in confusion and disappointment. Finally, in taking and receiving responsibilities, participants described their own role in the team. Conclusions Experiences of patients in a multiprofessional assessment were mostly positive. This highlights the value of a team assessment that takes several aspects of chronic pain into account when assessing complex patients.

The impact of patient preferences and costs on the appropriateness of spinal manipulation and mobilization for chronic low back pain and chronic neck pain.

BACKGROUND: Although the delivery of appropriate healthcare is an important goal, the definition of what constitutes appropriate care is not always agreed upon. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method is one of the most well-known and used approaches to define care appropriateness from the clinical perspective-i.e., that the expected effectiveness of a treatment exceeds its expected risks. However, patient preferences (the patient perspective) and costs (the healthcare system perspective) are also important determinants of appropriateness and should be considered. METHODS: We examined the impact of including information on patient preferences and cost on expert panel ratings of clinical appropriateness for spinal mobilization and manipulation for chronic low back pain and chronic neck pain. RESULTS: The majority of panelists thought patient preferences were important to consider in determining appropriateness and that their inclusion could change ratings, and half thought the same about cost. However, few actually changed their appropriateness ratings based on the information presented on patient preferences regarding the use of these therapies and their costs. This could be because the panel received information on average patient preferences for spinal mobilization and manipulation whereas some panelists commented that appropriateness should be determined based on the preferences of individual patients. Also, because these therapies are not expensive, their ratings may not be cost sensitive. The panelists also generally agreed that preferences and costs would only impact their ratings if the therapies were considered clinically appropriate. CONCLUSIONS: This study found that the information presented on patient preferences and costs for spinal mobilization and manipulation had little impact on the rated appropriateness of these therapies for chronic low back pain and chronic neck pain. Although it was generally agreed that patient preferences and costs were important to the appropriateness of M/M for CLBP and CNP, it seems that what would be most important were the preferences of the individual patient, not patients in general, and large cost differentials.

The Impact of Low Socioeconomic Status in Adults With Chronic Pain: An Integrative Review.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to describe evidence about chronic pain (CP) in lower socioeconomic status (SES) adult populations. DESIGN: The study design was an integrative review.DATA SOURCES used were MEDLINE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO, published from January 2008 to February 2018. REVIEW/ANALYSIS METHOD: Whittemore and Kanfl's 5 staged methodology (problem identification, literature search, data evaluation, data analysis, and presentation) was used to guide the review. RESULTS: Disparities based on SES affect CP development and management. Childhood risk factors impact CP experience over the life course. Neighborhood SES affects pain-related outcomes, and those with lower SES in rural settings have a higher prevalence of prescription opioid use. NURSING IMPLICATIONS: Findings from this review will support nurses to interpret CP through the lens of SES.

Facilitation of a Person-Centered Approach in Health Assessment of patients with chronic pain: An Ethnographic Study.

A phenomenologically derived assessment tool, Hermes, was developed in a rehabilitation setting for adopting the central ideals of person-centered care and patient participation into health-assessment practices in nursing. This focused ethnographic study aimed at exploring the feasibility of using Hermes for enabling the application of these ideals into assessment of patients with chronic pain upon admission to a rehabilitation center. Participants were patients with chronic pain, enrolled in rehabilitation, and their nurses. Data were collected by participant observation and interviews, and analyzed by thematic analysis. By the use of Hermes, the impact of illness was explored through supportive connection and dialogue with open, reflective, and interpretative features; understanding of the illness situation was enhanced; and possibilities provided in adjusting to health issues of concern. In sum, Hermes facilitated person-centered participation of patients with chronic pain in their health assessment and made a phenomenological philosophy usable in nursing-assessment practices.

Screening and assessment of chronic pain among children with cerebral palsy: a process evaluation of a pain toolbox.

Purpose: Though high numbers of children with cerebral palsy experience chronic pain, it remains under-recognized. This paper describes an evaluation of implementation supports and adoption of the Chronic Pain Assessment Toolbox for Children with Disabilities (the Toolbox) to enhance pain screening and assessment practices within a pediatric rehabilitation and complex continuing care hospital. Methods: A multicomponent knowledge translation strategy facilitated Toolbox adoption, inclusive of a clinical practice guideline, cerebral palsy practice points and assessment tools. Across the hospital, seven ambulatory care clinics with cerebral palsy caseloads participated in a staggered roll-out (Group 1: exclusive CP caseloads, March-December; Group 2: mixed diagnostic caseloads, August-December). Evaluation measures included client electronic medical record audit, document review and healthcare provider survey and interviews. Results: A significant change in documentation of pain screening and assessment practice from pre-Toolbox (<2%) to post-Toolbox adoption (53%) was found. Uptake in Group 2 clinics lagged behind Group 1. Opportunities to use the Toolbox consistently (based on diagnostic caseload) and frequently (based on client appointments) were noted among contextual factors identified. Overall, the Toolbox was positively received and clinically useful. Conclusion: Findings affirm that the Toolbox, in conjunction with the application of integrated knowledge translation principles and an established knowledge translation framework, has potential to be a useful resource to enrich and standardize chronic pain screening and assessment practices among children with cerebral palsy. Implications for Rehabilitation It is important to engage healthcare providers in the conceptualization, development, implementation and evaluation of a knowledge-to-action best practice product. The Chronic Pain Toolbox for Children with Disabilities provides rehabilitation staff with guidance on pain screening and assessment best practice and offers a range of validated tools that can be incorporated in ambulatory clinic settings to meet varied client needs. Considering unique clinical contexts (i.e., opportunities for use, provider engagement, staffing absences/turnover) is required to optimize and sustain chronic pain screening and assessment practices in rehabilitation outpatient settings.

Evaluating pain in cerebral palsy: comparing assessment tools using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health.

Purpose: Pain is prevalent and affects functioning and quality of life of children with cerebral palsy (CP). However, pain in CP is under recognized. The International Classification of Functioning, Disabiity and Health (ICF) guides the selection of comprehensive chronic pain assessment tools. Our objectives were to identify measures addressing pain in children with CP, characterize the content of each measure using the ICF, and identify gaps and overlaps. Materials and methods: Measures were identified from: (1) a systematic review of outcome measures (1998-2012) and (2) a scan of chronic pain measures (2013-2015). Included measures were those published in English, used in children and youth with CP, and contained an item/domain addressing pain. Constructs of the measures were linked to the ICF. Results: Overall, 31 measures addressing chronic pain in CP were included. Considerable variability was found in the degree to which their content represented the ICF. Most of pain measures address pain intensity and pain location (body functions) as opposed to functional impact of pain (activities and participation). Conclusions: Functional dimensions are poorly represented in pain measures. Our findings may guide the selection of measures for research and clinical needs for comprehensive chronic pain management in children with CP. Implications for Rehabilitation Chronic pain is prevalent among children with cerebral palsy and significantly interfere with functional activities. To effectively manage chronic pain in children with cerebral palsy, measures capturing functional-based information need to be part of routine chronic pain assessment.