Multi-institutional assessment of ureteroscopic laser papillotomy for chronic flank pain associated with papillary calcifications.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the long-term safety, efficacy and durability of ureteroscopic laser papillotomy for chronic flank pain associated with renal papillary calcifications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of all patients who underwent ureteroscopic laser papillotomy in the absence of free urinary calculi at our institutions from 1998 through 2008. Success was defined as patient report of significant pain relief. The duration of response was considered the time from papillotomy to repeat papillotomy in the same renal unit, patient report of recurrent pain or final followup. RESULTS: Ureteroscopic Ho:YAG laser papillotomy was done a total of 176 times in 65 patients, including 147 unilateral and 29 bilateral procedures. Of the patients 39 underwent multiple procedures (2 to 12). Symptomatic followup was available in 50 patients (146 procedures) during a mean of 38 months. Significantly less pain was reported after 121 procedures (83%). The mean duration of response per procedure was 26 months and 30 patients (60%) had a mean remission duration of greater than 1 year. Postoperatively hospital admission was required after 14 procedures (8%). There was no significant change in the mean estimated glomerular filtration rate during a mean 41.3-month followup. Seven of the 65 patients (11%) had hypertension before papillotomy. In 3 of the 49 patients (6.1%) with adequate followup new hypertension developed during a mean of 38 months. CONCLUSIONS: Ureteroscopic laser papillotomy is safe and effective. In patients with papillary calcifications and characteristic chronic, noncolicky pain this procedure provides significant, moderately durable symptom relief.

Assessment of adrenal functions in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease.

BACKGROUND: Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is the most common hereditary kidney disease and extrarenal manifestations may be observed in many organ systems. Hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis was not evaluated extensively in patients with ADPKD. We aimed to evaluate this axis in these patients. METHODS: Twenty two patients with ADPKD and 27 healthy subjects were enrolled. Basal dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS) levels and cortisol and DHEA responses to low dose short adrenocorticotropin stimulation test were assessed. Correlation analyses of these parameters with glomerular filtration rates (GFR), renal volumes and pain characteristics in patients with ADPKD were performed. RESULTS: Patients with ADPKD had higher basal cortisol levels (12.1 ± 3.4 vs. 9.6 ± 4.3 µg/dL, p=0.033), and higher basal cortisol/DHEAS ratios (0.073 ± 0.05 vs. 0.045 ± 0.02, p=0.015) compared to controls. None of the subjects had inadequate response to adrenocorticotropin stimulation. Patients with ADPKD had lower delta cortisol (absolute increase between peak and basal) levels (10.3 ± 2.8 vs. 12.6 ± 4.2 µg/dL, p=0.026) compared to controls. Subgroup analysis showed that significant differences existed only between female patients and female controls. There was no significant correlation between cortisol levels and renal volumes or GFR. A significant correlation was found only between delta cortisol and pain frequency in female patients. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ADPKD had higher basal cortisol levels, higher basal cortisol/DHEAS ratios and lower delta cortisol levels compared to controls, indicating promptly stimulated zona fasciculata function. Further studies are needed to confirm these results and to investigate possible underlying mechanisms.

Ultrasound and CT imaging assessment of renal angiomyolipoma.

The authors report a case of a 41-year-old woman who was admitted to the emergency department of our hospital because of acute right flank pain. Laboratory investigations and cultures were negative. A transabdominal ultrasonography revealed a large mass of the upper pole of the right kidney as an incidental finding.

Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) of intravenous urography (IVU) and unenhanced multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) for initial investigation of suspected acute ureterolithiasis.

BACKGROUND: It is important to compare the cost and effectiveness of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) and intravenous urography (IVU) to determine the most cost-effective alternative for the initial investigation of acute ureterolithiasis. PURPOSE: To analyze the task-specific variable costs combined with the diagnostic effect of MDCT and IVU for patients with acute flank pain, and to determine which is most cost effective. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 119 patients with acute flank pain suggestive of stone disease (ureterolithiasis) were examined by both MDCT and IVU. Variable costs related to medical equipment, consumption material, equipment control, and personnel were calculated. The diagnostic effect was assessed. RESULTS: The variable costs of MDCT versus IVU were EUR 32 and EUR 117, respectively. This significant difference was mainly due to savings in examination time, higher annual examination frequency, lower material costs, and no use of contrast media. As for diagnostic effect, MDCT proved considerably more accurate in the diagnosis of stone disease than IVU and markedly more accurate concerning differential diagnoses. CONCLUSION: MDCT had lower differential costs and a higher capacity to determine correctly stone disease and differential diagnoses, as compared to IVU, in patients with acute flank pain. Consequently, MDCT is a dominant alternative to IVU when evaluated exclusively from a cost-effective perspective.

Unenhanced helical computed tomography vs intravenous urography in patients with acute flank pain: accuracy and economic impact in a randomized prospective trial.

Unenhanced helical computed tomography (UHCT) has evolved into a well-accepted alternative to intravenous urography (IVU) in patients with acute flank pain and suspected ureterolithiasis. The purpose of our randomized prospective study was to analyse the diagnostic accuracy of UHCT vs IVU in the normal clinical setting with special interest on economic impact, applied radiation dose and time savings in patient management. A total of 122 consecutive patients with acute flank pain suggestive of urolithiasis were randomized for UHCT ( n=59) or IVU ( n=63). Patient management (time, contrast media), costs and radiation dose were analysed. The films were independently interpreted by four radiologists, unaware of previous findings, clinical history and clinical outcome. Alternative diagnoses if present were assessed. Direct costs of UHCT and IVU are nearly identical (310/309 Euro). Indirect costs are much lower for UHCT because it saves examination time and when performed immediately initial abdominal plain film (KUB) and sonography are not necessary. Time delay between access to the emergency room and start of the imaging procedure was 32 h 7 min for UHCT and 36 h 55 min for IVU. The UHCT took an average in-room time of 23 min vs 1 h 21 min for IVU. Mild to moderate adverse reactions for contrast material were seen in 3 (5%) patients. The UHCT was safe, as no contrast material was needed. The mean applied radiation dose was 3.3 mSv for IVU and 6.5 mSv for UHCT. Alternative diagnoses were identified in 4 (7%) UHCT patients and 3 (5%) IVU patients. Sensitivity and specificity of UHCT and IVU was 94.1 and 94.2%, and 85.2 and 90.4%, respectively. In patients with suspected renal colic KUB and US may be the least expensive and most easily accessable modalities; however, if needed and available, UHCT can be considered a better alternative than IVU because it has a higher diagnostic accuracy and a better economic impact since it is more effective, faster, less expensive and less risky than IVU. In addition, it also has the capability of detecting various additional renal and extrarenal pathologies.

Unenhanced spiral CT for the assessment of renal colic. How does limiting the referral base affect the discovery of additional findings not related to urinary tract calculi?

The value of unenhanced spiral CT (UESCT) for investigating acute flank pain suggestive of urinary tract calculi is increasingly appreciated in the last few years. Recent studies have identified the advantages of UESCT in recognizing alternative findings within or outside the urinary tract. We sought to determine how narrowing the referral base for the UESCT would affect the discovery of potentially significant alternative findings in patients with acute flank pain suggestive of renal colic. Between January 1999 and December 1999, 425 patients, 271 (63.8%) men and 154 (36.2%) women who were 1-90 years old (mean 45.7 years old) with acute flank pain were studied with UESCT. CT studies were solely ordered by urologists, and only patients with intractable renal colic or patients that returned more than once to the emergency room with the complaint of acute flank pain were studied. A calculus within the ureter was diagnostic of an obstructive stone. Any other abnormality within the abdomen and pelvis was reported. A ureteral calculus was detected on 251 (59%) CT scans. Nineteen (4.5%) CT scans were consistent with recent excretion of a stone. In 112 (26.3%) CT scans, the cause for the patient's acute flank pain could not be explained. Forty-three (10.1%) alternative significant diagnoses that explain the patient's complaints were found. Nineteen (44%) were findings related to the urinary tract, and 24 (56%) were not related to the urinary tract. Ninety-seven (22.3%) additional findings not significant to the patient's current complaint were also reported. Even when narrowing the indications for the UESCT, about 10% of significant alternative findings to urinary stones were encountered. The variety of diagnoses found unexpectedly on the UESCT that alter a patient's management demonstrates the pivotal role of UESCT in triaging these patients rapidly towards optimal therapy. The UESCT can be used as a useful screening tool, sometimes revealing the exact pathology and sometimes directing the radiologist to the modality by which to continue.

Computed tomography versus intravenous urography in diagnosis of acute flank pain from urolithiasis: a randomized study comparing imaging costs and radiation dose.

The equivalent sensitivity of non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) and intravenous urography (IVU) in the diagnosis of suspected ureteric colic has been established. Approximately 50% of patients with suspected ureteric colic do not have a nephro-urological cause for pain. Because many such patients require further imaging studies, NCCT may obviate the need for these studies and, in so doing, be more cost effective and involve less overall radiation exposure. The present study compares the total imaging cost and radiation dose of NCCT versus IVU in the diagnosis of acute flank pain. Two hundred and twenty-four patients (157 men; mean age 45 years; age range 19-79 years) with suspected renal colic were randomized either to NCCT or IVU. The number of additional diagnostic imaging studies, cost (IVU A$136; CTU A$173), radiation exposure and imaging times were compared. Of 119 (53%) patients with renal obstruction, 105 had no nephro-urological causes of pain. For 21 (20%) of these patients an alternative diagnosis was made at the initial imaging, 10 of which were significant. Of 118 IVU patients, 28 (24%) required 32 additional imaging tests to reach a diagnosis, whereas seven of 106 (6%) NCCT patients required seven additional imaging studies. The average total diagnostic imaging cost for the NCCT group was A$181.94 and A$175.46 for the IVU group (P < 0.43). Mean radiation dose to diagnosis was 5.00 mSv (NCCT) versus 3.50 mSv (IVU) (P < 0.001). Mean imaging time was 30 min (NCCT) versus 75 min (IVU) (P < 0.001). Diagnostic imaging costs were remarkably similar. Although NCCT involves a higher radiation dose than IVU, its advantages of faster diagnosis, the avoidance of additional diagnostic imaging tests and its ability to diagnose other causes makes it the study of choice for acute flank pain at Christchurch Hospital.

Unenhanced helical computed tomography for the evaluation of suspected renal colic in the adolescent population: a pilot study.

OBJECTIVES: Unenhanced helical computed tomography (UHCT) is rapidly becoming the preferred imaging modality for the evaluation of suspected renal colic in the adult population; however, a series addressing its use in the adolescent population has not been previously published. We assessed the utility of UHCT in the evaluation of suspected renal colic in this age group. METHODS: Seventeen patients between the ages of 8 and 18 years (mean 14.7) presented to the emergency departments of four hospitals for evaluation of suspected renal colic. All patients were studied with UHCT immediately after initial evaluation. A single helical acquisition was performed from the midpoint of T-12 vertebra to a point below the bladder base, using a slice thickness of 5 mm. Films were reviewed by the institutional radiologist, and results were quantified. RESULTS: Of the 17 patients who underwent evaluation, no abnormality was detected in 8 patients. A stone was localized in 7 patients who were then appropriately treated. One patient had no stone visualized, but secondary signs suggested a recently passed stone. The final patient had no stone; however, marked bilateral hydroureteronephrosis was noted that led to further evaluation. A single phlebolith was seen in only 1 patient, and no study was nondiagnostic. CONCLUSIONS: UHCT is a safe, rapidly performed test for the evaluation of suspected renal colic in adolescents. It is highly sensitive and specific for renal and ureteral calculi and, more importantly, allows visualization of alternate pathology. In addition, secondary signs are seen that aid in determining obstruction and are helpful if no stone is visualized. Phleboliths, which can simulate a stone, are rarely seen in adolescence. We believe UHCT allows for rapid triage and localization of stones and should be recommended as the primary diagnostic modality for the evaluation of adolescents with suspected renal colic.