Histopathology, mRNA expression profile, and donor-derived cell-free DNA for assessment of rejection in pediatric heart transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The relationship between histopathologic and molecular ("MMDx"®) assessments of endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) and serum donor-derived cell-free DNA (ddcfDNA) in acute rejection (AR) assessment following pediatric heart transplantation (HT) is unknown. METHODS: EMB sent for MMDx and histopathology from November 2021 to September 2022 were reviewed. MMDx and histopathology results were compared. DdcfDNA obtained ≤1 week prior to EMB were compared with histopathology and MMDx results. The discrimination of ddcfDNA for AR was assessed using receiver-operating curves. FINDINGS: In this study, 177 EMBs were obtained for histopathology and MMDx, 101 had time-matched ddcfDNA values. MMDx and Histopathology displayed moderate agreement for T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR, Kappa = 0.52, p < .001) and antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR, Kappa = 0.41, p < .001). Discordant results occurred in 24% of cases, most often with ABMR. Compared with no AR, ddcfDNA values were elevated in cases of AR diagnosed by both histopathology and MMDx (p < .01 for all). Additionally, ddcfDNA values were elevated in injury patterns on MMDx, even when AR was not present (p = .01). DdcfDNA displayed excellent discrimination (AUC 0.83) for AR by MMDx and/or histopathology. Using a threshold of ≥0.135%, ddcfDNA had a sensitivity of 90%, specificity of 63%, PPV of 52%, and NPV of 94%. CONCLUSIONS: Histopathology and MMDx displayed moderate agreement in diagnosing AR following pediatric HT, with most discrepancies noted in the presence of ABMR. DdcfDNA is elevated with AR, with excellent discrimination and high NPV particularly when utilizing MMDx. A combination of all three tests may be necessary in some cases.

Assessment of efficacy and safety by CalliSpheres versus HepaSpheres for drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization in unresectable large hepatocellular carcinoma patients.

This study aimed to compare efficacy and safety of HepaSpheres and CalliSpheres in unresectable large hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. One hundred and twenty-seven unresectable large HCC patients receiving drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) treatment with CalliSpheres or HepaSpheres microspheres were analyzed. Treatment response, Karnofsky performance status (KPS) score, adverse events, main liver function indexes, time to progression (TTP), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. Objective response rate (82.7% vs. 63.8%, p=.030) and disease control rate (100.0% vs. 91.5%, p=.030) were increased in CalliSpheres group compared to HepaSpheres group at 1 month after treatment, while no difference was found between the two groups regarding treatment response at 3 or 6 months post treatment (all p>.05). The KPS score at 1, 3, and 6 months was similar between the two groups (all p>.05). As for the liver function, the ALT, AST, ALB, and TBIL levels at 7 and 30 days were of no difference between the two groups (all p>.05). In addition, the adverse events including nausea/vomiting, pain, fever, myelosuppression, biloma, and abscess were of no difference between the two groups, either (all p>.05). In terms of survival profile, there was no difference regarding TTP (6.3 months (95%CI: 5.9-6.6 months) vs. 6.0 months (95%CI: 5.6-6.4 months), p=.082) or OS (23.0 months (95%CI: 20.1-25.9 months) vs. 22.0 months (95%CI: 20.2-23.8 months), p=.571) between the two groups. In conclusion, CalliSpheres seems to be superior in short-term efficacy and equal in long-term efficacy as well as safety compared to HepaSpheres for DEB-TACE treatment in unresectable large HCC patients.

Risk factors for pegylated liposomal doxorubicin-induced moderate to severe hand-foot syndrome in breast cancer patients: assessment of baseline clinical parameters.

BACKGROUND: Hand-foot syndrome (HFS) is a side effect of skin related to pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) application. Moderate to severe hand-foot syndrome (MSHFS) might have a serious impact on patients' quality of life and treatment. However, information on risk factors for the development of MSHFS is still limited. To analyze the risk factors for PLD-induced MSHFS in breast cancer patients and constructed a logistic regression prediction model. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of breast cancer patients who were treated with a PLD regimen in the Tumor Hospital of Harbin Medical University from January 2017 to August 2019. A total of 26 factors were collected from electronic medical records. Patients were divided into MSHFS (HFS > grade 1) and NMHFS (HFS ≤ grade 1) groups according to the NCI classification. Statistical analysis of these factors and the construction of a logistic regression prediction model based on risk factors. RESULTS: A total of 44.7% (206/461) of patients developed MSHFS. The BMI, dose intensity, and baseline Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels in the MSHFS group, as well as good peripheral blood circulation, excessive sweat excretion, history of gallstones, and tumour- and HER2-positive percentages, were all higher than those in the NMHFS group (P < 0.05). The model for predicting the occurrence of MSHFS was P = 1/1 + exp. (11.138-0.110*BMI-0.234*dose intensity-0.018*baseline ALT+ 0.025*baseline AST-1.225*gallstone history-0.681* peripheral blood circulation-1.073*sweat excretion-0.364*with or without tumor-0.680*HER-2). The accuracy of the model was 72.5%, AUC = 0.791, and Hosmer-Lemeshow fit test P = 0.114 > 0.05. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly half of the patients developed MSHFS. The constructed prediction model may be valuable for predicting the occurrence of MSHFS in patients.

Pembrolizumab in advanced recurrent endometrial cancer: A cost-effectiveness analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab in patients with recurrent endometrial cancer that have failed first-line chemotherapy. METHODS: We created a model to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab compared to pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) or bevacizumab for the treatment of women with recurrent endometrial cancer who have failed carboplatin and paclitaxel. Microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) and non-microsatellite instability-high (non-MSI-H) tumors were evaluated. We included 4400 patients in the model; 800 patients were assumed to have MSI-H tumors. Drug costs were calculated using 2016-2017 wholesale acquisition costs, and cost of Grade III-IV toxicities was estimated from clinical experience. Effectiveness was calculated as 2-year overall survival (OS). We calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) to determine the cost per 2-year survivor. Univariate sensitivity analyses were performed. The willingness to pay threshold was $100,000 per year of OS. RESULTS: The cost of therapy with PLD and bevacizumab were $33.2 million (M) and $167.9 M, respectively. The cost of pembrolizumab therapy was $318.3 M for non-MSI-H patients compared to $57.9 M for MSI-H patients. For non-MSI-H patients, bevacizumab was cost-effective relative to PLD with an ICER of $153,028, while pembrolizumab was not cost-effective relative to bevacizumab with an ICER of $341,830. For MSI-H patients, pembrolizumab was cost-effective compared to PLD with an ICER of $147,249, while bevacizumab was subjected to extended dominance. Sensitivity analysis revealed that for non-MSI-H patients, one cycle of pembrolizumab would need to cost $7253 or less to be cost-effective. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with MSI-H recurrent endometrial cancers who have failed first-line chemotherapy, pembrolizumab is cost-effective relative to other single agent drugs. To be cost-effective in non-MSI-H patients, the cost of pembrolizumab should decrease substantially.

Investigation of the Discriminatory Ability of Pharmacokinetic Metrics for the Bioequivalence Assessment of PEGylated Liposomal Doxorubicin.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to construct a population pharmacokinetic model for pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and use the final model to investigate the discrimination performance of pharmacokinetic metrics (e.g., Cmax, AUC and partial AUC) of various analytes (e.g., liposome encapsulated doxorubicin, free doxorubicin and total doxorubicin) for the identification of formulation differences by means of Monte Carlo simulations. METHODS: A model was simultaneously built to characterize the concentration time profiles of liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin and free doxorubicin using NONMEM. The different scenarios associated with changes in release rate (Rel) were simulated based on the final parameters. 500 simulated virtual bioequivalence (BE) studies were performed for each scenario, and power curves for the probability of declaring BE were also computed. RESULTS: The concentration time profiles of liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin and free doxorubicin were well described by a one- and two-compartment model, respectively. pAUC0-24 h and pAUC0-48 h of free doxorubicin was most responsive to changes in the Rel when the Rel (test)/Rel (reference) ratios decreased. In contrast, when the Rel (test) increased, AUC0-t of liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin was the most responsive metric. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to the traditional metrics, partial AUC should be included for the BE assessment of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin.

Geriatric assessment and biomarkers in patients with metastatic breast cancer receiving first-line mono-chemotherapy: Results from the randomized phase III PELICAN trial.

OBJECTIVES: To determine predictive/prognostic factors for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) receiving first-line monochemotherapy using biomarker analysis and geriatric assessment (GA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) and GA as clinical parameters, and prognostic inflammatory and nutritional index (PINI), and Glasgow prognostic score (GPS) as biomarkers were analyzed for association with clinical outcome within the randomized phase III PEg-LIposomal Doxorubicin vs. CApecitabin iN MBC (PELICAN) trial of first-line pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) or capecitabine. RESULTS: Of 210 patients, 38% were >65years old. GA (n=152) classified 74% as fit, 10% as compromised, and 16% as frail. Biomarkers showed no age dependency. In multivariate analysis (n=70) KPS, GA, cumulative illness rating scale-geriatrics (CIRS-G), and GPS were significantly associated with time to progression, and KPS, CIRS-G, and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) from GA, and PINI showed a significant correlation with overall survival. CONCLUSION: GA evaluation was feasible. KPS significantly correlated with efficacy outcomes. Items of a GA and biomarkers of inflammation and nutrition may have prognostic significance in patients with MBC.

The Pharmacological Costs of Second-Line Treatments for Recurrent Ovarian Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: In ovarian cancer, it is uncertain which chemotherapy regimen is more clinically effective and cost-effective for the treatment of recurrence; therefore, it might be interesting to make a balance between the cost of the drugs administered and the difference in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). METHODS: The present evaluation was restricted to pivotal phase 3 randomized controlled trials. We calculated the pharmacological costs necessary to get the benefit in PFS and OS. The costs of drugs are at the pharmacy of our hospital and are expressed in Euros (&OV0556;). We have subsequently applied the European Society for Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale. RESULTS: Our study evaluated 3 phase 3 randomized controlled trials, including 2004 patients. The most relevant increase of costs was associated with the combination chemotherapy including trabectedin, with the highest costs for month of PFS gained (15,836 &OV0556;) and for month of OS gained (7198 &OV0556;), but it substantially differs considering the data of partially platinum-sensitive populations (platinum-free interval of 6-12 months), with 3959 &OV0556; for month of OS gained. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of trabectedin to pegylated liposomal doxorubicin for the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer can lead to an increase of pharmacological costs. Differently, considering OS in patients with platinum-free interval of 6 to 12 months, there is a halving of pharmacological costs with the addition of trabectedin to pegylated liposomal doxorubicin. These costs are in line with the spending suggested as sustainable (thresholds of <$61,500 per life-year gained).

The Cardiotoxic Mechanism of Doxorubicin (DOX) and Pegylated Liposomal DOX in Mice Bearing C-26 Colon Carcinoma: a Study Focused on microRNA Role for Toxicity Assessment of New Formulations.

PURPOSE: MicroRNAs (miRs) are a group of small non-coding RNAs that regulate transcriptional or post-transcriptional gene expression. The aim of the present study was to investigate the role of miR -1, -21 and -145 and their targets in cardiotoxicity-induced by DOX and pegylated liposomal DOX. METHODS: BALB/c mice subjected to subcutaneous injection of C-26 tumor cells. Eight days after tumor inoculation, animals were divided into 6 groups: control, liposome, DOX (6 and 9 mg/kg) and PL-DOX (6 and 9 mg/kg). The formulations were administered one time per week for four weeks. 24 h after the last injection, mice were sacrificed; blood and heart samples were taken. Western blot analysis was done on protein extracts to investigate the expression of cardiac caspase-3, -8, Bax, Bcl2, Programmed cell death 4 (PDCD4) and BCL2/Adenovirus E1B 19 kDa Interacting Protein 3 (BNIP3). The expression levels of miR -1, -21 and -145 were also evaluated by quantitative real-time PCR. RESULTS: Mice treated with both DOX formulations showed a marked inhibition in tumor growth. Western blot analysis indicated that the expression level of cardiac caspase-3, caspase-8, Bax and BNIP3 were up-regulated due to DOX injection (9 mg/kg). Exposure of mice with DOX resulted in a significant increase in cardiac miR-1 and miR-21 expression level. PL-DOX treatment did not change the proteins and miRs expression. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that miR -1, -21 and -145 may involve in cardiotoxicity induced by DOX. Evaluation of miRs signaling pathways might be of potential value for toxicity assessment of new formulations. Graphical Abstract The cardiotoxic mechanism of doxorubicin (DOX) and pegylated liposomal DOX (PL-DOX).

Modern Management of Anthracycline-Induced Cardiotoxicity in Lymphoma Patients: Low Occurrence of Cardiotoxicity with Comprehensive Assessment and Tailored Substitution by Nonpegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin.

BACKGROUND: Anthracyclines (AC) are still undeniable drugs in lymphoma treatment, despite occasionally causing cardiotoxicity. Liposomal AC may reduce cardiotoxicity while retaining clinical efficacy; also, biomarker monitoring during chemotherapy allows early detection of cardiac damage, enabling strategies to prevent left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) deterioration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational trial in a real-life population of lymphoma patients, combining advanced echocardiography and biomarkers (Troponin I [TnI]) for early detection of cardiotoxicity; we applied a prespecified policy to minimize cardiotoxicity, selecting patients with higher baseline risk to replace doxorubicin with nonpegylated liposomal doxorubicin (NPLD) and starting cardioprotective treatment when subclinical cardiotoxicity was detected. RESULTS: Ninety-nine patients received ≥1 cycle of chemotherapy (39 with NPLD): 38 (NPLD = 34) were older than 65 years. At baseline, the NPLD subgroup had more cardiovascular risk factors and comorbidities than the doxorubicin subgroup. After treatment, echocardiographic parameters did not worsen in the NPLD subgroup; significant LVEF reduction occurred in two patients treated with doxorubicin. Over treatment course, TnI rises increased linearly in the doxorubicin subgroup but modestly in the NPLD subgroup. At doxorubicin doses >200 mg/m2 the difference was statistically significant, with more TnI rises in the doxorubicin subgroup. NPLD-treated patients did not experience higher rates of grade 3-4 adverse events. Within the diffuse large B-cell lymphomas category, we observed similar rates of complete and overall responses between doxorubicin- and NPLD-treated patients. CONCLUSION: A comprehensive strategy to prevent, detect, and treat cardiotoxicity allows an optimal management of the lymphoma with low incidence of cardiac complications. The Oncologist 2017;22:422-431 IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Despite the recent advances of targeted therapy in cancer, old cytotoxic drugs such as anthracyclines (AC) still play a fundamental role in the treatment of many lymphoma patients. We tested and validated in a real-life setting a personalized approach to prevent, detect, and treat AC-induced cardiotoxicity; biomarker monitoring was accomplished by Troponin I measurements before and after chemotherapy infusions, allowing detection of early subclinical cardiotoxicity, which was preemptively treated with cardio-protectants (beta blockers and angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors). A telemedicine system allowed interdisciplinary management of the patients with an expert cardiologist. Furthermore, tailored use of liposomal AC following a prespecified policy appeared to prevent the excess cardiotoxicity expected in high-risk patients.

Acute decompensated heart failure as a reason of premature chemotherapy discontinuation may be independent of a lifetime doxorubicin dose in lymphoma patients with cardiovascular disorders.

BACKGROUND: Algorithm of anthracycline-based chemotherapy with favourable cardio-oncological outcome should be clearly re-defined for lymphoma patients with significant pre-existing cardiovascular diseases. A clinical benefit of liposomal forms of anthracycline is still debatable. METHODS: Polish registry included observations of 138 lymphoma patients with concomitant cardiovascular disorders who received liposomal doxorubicin as cardioprotective alternative of conventional form. It was created to analyse the importance of a strategy of administration of conventional/liposomal doxorubicin and a lifetime doxorubicin dose for development of acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) as a reason of premature chemotherapy discontinuation. RESULTS: ADHF was the cause of premature termination of chemotherapy only in 11 patients (7.97%). The five new episodes of ADHF related to liposomal doxorubicin were recorded in subgroup of 70 patients with pre-existing heart failure (7.14%). There was the similar incidence of ADHF when liposomal doxorubicin was applied after conventional form in dose 200mg/m2 or if earlier signs of iatrogenic myocardial damage was recognised: 5 cases in subgroup of 51 patients with baseline cardiovascular risk factors (9.8%). ADHF was observed in one of 17 patients (5.88%) receiving liposomal doxorubicin as second line chemotherapy after first line with conventional doxorubicin. Consequently throughout the study group ADHF didn't depend on the total cumulative dose of all types of doxorubicin: OR=0.85; 95%CI: 0.66-1.10; p=0.22 for each 50mg/m2. CONCLUSION: The schedule of administration of conventional/liposomal doxorubicin can decide that lifetime combined doses of anthracyclines become insignificant for ADHF occurrence and premature discontinuation of chemotherapy in lymphoma patients with pre-existing cardiovascular disturbances.

Cost Effectiveness Analysis of Different Management Strategies between Best Supportive Care and Second-line Chemotherapy for Platinum-resistant or Refractory Ovarian Cancer.

BACKGROUND: There is no standard treatment for patients with platinum-resistant or refractory epithelial ovarian cancer. Single agent chemotherapies have evidence of more efficacy and less toxicity than combination therapy. Most are very expensive, with appreciable toxicity and minimal survival. Since it is difficult to make comparison between outcomes, economic analysis of single-agent chemotherapy regimens and best supportive care may help to make decisions about an appropriate management for the affected patients. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost effectiveness of second-line chemotherapy compared with best supportive care for patients with platinum-resistant or refractory epithelial ovarian cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A Markov model was used to estimate the effectiveness and total costs associated with treatments. The hypothetical patient population comprised women aged 55 with platinum-resistant or refractory epithelial ovarian cancer. Four types of alternative treatment options were evaluated: 1) gemcitabine followed by BSC; 2) pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) followed by BSC; 3) gemcitabine followed by topotecan; and 4) PLD followed by topotecan. Baseline comparator of alternative treatments was BSC. Time horizon of the analysis was 2 years. Health care provider perspective and 3% discount rate were used to determine the costs of medical treatment in this study. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) were used to measure the treatment effectiveness. Treatment effectiveness data were derived from the literature. Costs were calculated from unit cost treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer patients at various stages of disease in King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital (KCMH) in the year 2011. Parameter uncertainty was tested in probabilistic sensitivity analysis by using Monte Carlo simulation. One-way sensitivity analysis was used to explore each variable's impact on the uncertainty of the results. RESULTS: Approximated life expectancy of best supportive care was 0.182 years and its total cost was 26,862 Baht. All four alternative treatments increased life expectancy. Life expectancy of gemcitabine followed by BSC, PLD followed by BSC, gemcitabine followed by topotecan and PLD followed by topotecan was 0.510, 0.513, 0.566, and 0.570 years, respectively. The total cost of gemcitabine followed by BSC, PLD followed by BSC, gemcitabine followed by topotecan and PLD followed by topotecan was 113,000, 124,302, 139,788 and 151,135 Baht, respectively. PLD followed by topotecan had the highest expected quality-adjusted life-years but was the most expensive of all the above strategies. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) of gemcitabine followed by BSC, PLD followed by BSC, gemcitabine followed by topotecan and PLD followed by topotecan was 344,643, 385,322, 385,856, and 420,299 Baht, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: All of the second-line chemotherapy strategies showed certain benefits due to an increased life- year gained compared with best supportive care. Moreover, gemcitabine as second-line chemotherapy followed by best supportive care in progressive disease case was likely to be more effective strategy with less cost from health care provider perspective. Gemcitabine was the most cost-effective treatment among all four alternative treatments. ICER is only an economic factor. Treatment decisions should be based on the patient benefit.

An integrated assessment of morphology, size, and complement activation of the PEGylated liposomal doxorubicin products Doxil®, Caelyx®, DOXOrubicin, and SinaDoxosome.

In order to improve patient's benefit and safety, comprehensive regulatory guidelines on specificities of Non-Biological Complex Drugs (NBCDs), such as doxorubicin-encapsulated liposomes, and their follow-on versions are needed. Here, we compare Doxil® and its European analog Caelyx® with the two follow-on products DOXOrubicin (approved by the US Food and Drug Administration) and SinaDoxosome (produced in Iran) by cryogenic transmission electron microscopy, dynamic light scattering and Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis, and assess their potential in activating the complement system in human sera. We found subtle physicochemical differences between the tested liposomal products and even between the tested batches of Doxil® and Caelyx®. Notably, these included differences in vesicular population aspect ratios and particle number. Among the tested products, only SinaDoxosome, in addition to the presence of unilamellar vesicles with entrapped doxorubicin crystals, contained empty circular disks. Differences were also found in complement responses, which may be related to some morphological differences. This study has demonstrated an integrated biophysical and immunological toolbox for improved analysis and detection of physical differences among vesicular populations that may modulate their clinical performance. Combined, these approaches may help better product selection for infusion to the patients as well as for improved design and characterization of future vesicular NBCDs with enhanced clinical performance and safety.

Risk factors for pegylated liposomal doxorubicin-induced palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia over time: assessment of monocyte count and baseline clinical parameters.

PURPOSE: Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) is widely used in relapsing ovarian carcinoma. Its original formulation is metabolized by the monocyte-macrophage system. One of its main toxicities is the palmoplantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE) syndrome. To date, no predictive factors of PPE have been identified. METHODS: Data of patients (pts) treated with PLD between 2005 and 2014 were retrospectively collected. A case-control study was performed, comparing main baseline clinical and biological characteristics of pts experiencing PPE and those who did not, after at least three cycles of PLD. A pilot analysis of blood monocyte subpopulations (classical, intermediate and non-classical) was performed by FACS in selected pts. RESULTS: Among 88 pts treated with PLD, 28 experienced PPE of any grade (31, 95 % CI 21-41). The first occurrence of PPE was at first cycle in only 11 % of pts, peaked at cycle 2 (32 %) and represented 57 % of cases after cycle 3. Baseline characteristics of pts with PPE were compared to 27 control pts who received at least 3 cycles. Older pts represented 61 % of pts with PPE and 15 % of pts without PPE (p = 0.04 by Chi-square test). Monocyte count and inflammatory parameters were not associated with PPE. However, the analysis of monocyte subpopulations revealed a large inter-patient variability. CONCLUSION: Contrary to most acute toxicities, PPE occurred more frequently after several cycles, suggesting a PLD body accumulation through repeated cycles. PPE was more frequent in pts older than 70 years. Monocyte subpopulations may have different roles on PLD metabolism and warrant further studies.

Effective Remote Loading of Doxorubicin into DPPC/Poloxamer 188 Hybrid Liposome to Retain Thermosensitive Property and the Assessment of Carrier-Based Acute Cytotoxicity for Pulmonary Administration.

Functional liposome administration via the pulmonary route is of interest to treat pulmonary diseases, including cancer. Here, a block copolymer used as a medical additive, Poloxamer 188 (P188), was incorporated into liposome membranes, and the thermosensitive characteristics of the DPPC/P188 hybrid liposomes were assessed. An increase in P188 incorporation in DPPC liposomes enhanced the release of calcein, a fluorescence marker, from liposomes at 42°C in vitro; calcein release was significantly slower at 37°C. The lipid composition was optimal at a DPPC/P188 ratio of 3:0.4 (molar ratio). DPPC/P188 liposomes did not exhibit in vitro cytotoxicity against A549 cells and Raw 264.7 cells used as models of pulmonary cells or trigger in vivo acute inflammation as determined by the secretion of tumor necrosis factor alpha. Next, an anticancer drug, doxorubicin (DOX), was loaded with approximately 90% efficiency into DPPC/P188 liposomes using a remote-loading method and a DOX-phospholipid ratio of 1:20 (w/w). The interior buffer of liposome has remarkably changed DOX release at 42°C. DOX released from DPPC/P188 liposomes at 42°C exhibited cytotoxic effects toward A549 cells comparable with free DOX solution. These results suggest that a DOX-loaded DPPC/P188 liposome formulation administered via the pulmonary route may be useful for treating lung cancer.

Selective cardiac surveillance in patients with gynecologic cancer undergoing treatment with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD).

OBJECTIVE: The study objective was to examine the safety and cost savings of selective cardiac surveillance (CS) during treatment with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD). METHODS: A retrospective, dual institution study of women receiving PLD for the treatment of a gynecologic malignancy was performed. The study period was 2002-2014. At both institutions, a selective strategy for CS was implemented in which only high-risk women with a cardiac history or with symptoms suggestive of cardiac toxicity during PLD treatment underwent a cardiac evaluation. Patient demographics, clinical and treatment history were evaluated. Cost analyses were performed utilizing professional/technical fee rates for echocardiogram and multi-gated acquisition scan for each state. RESULTS: PLD was administered in 184 women. The mean patient age was 62.7years, and 79% were treated for recurrent ovarian or peritoneal carcinoma. The median cumulative administered dose of PLD was 300mg/m(2); 24 received >550mg/m(2). The median follow-up time was 20months. Of the 184 patients, the majority (n=157, 85.3%) did not undergo either an initial cardiac evaluation or surveillance during or post-PLD treatment. Fifty-three patients considered high risk for anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity underwent CS. Only three patients (1.6%) in the entire cohort developed CHF that was possibly related to PLD treatment; all had significant pre-existing cardiac risk factors. Selective instead of routine use of CS in the study population resulted in a cost savings of $182,552.28. CONCLUSION: Utilizing cardiac surveillance in select women undergoing PLD treatment for gynecologic malignancies resulted in significant health care cost savings without adversely impacting clinical outcomes.

Topotecan, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin hydrochloride, paclitaxel, trabectedin and gemcitabine for advanced recurrent or refractory ovarian cancer: a systematic review and economic evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Ovarian cancer is the fifth most common cancer in the UK, and the fourth most common cause of cancer death. Of those people successfully treated with first-line chemotherapy, 55-75% will relapse within 2 years. At this time, it is uncertain which chemotherapy regimen is more clinically effective and cost-effective for the treatment of recurrent, advanced ovarian cancer. OBJECTIVES: To determine the comparative clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan (Hycamtin(®), GlaxoSmithKline), pegylated liposomal doxorubicin hydrochloride (PLDH; Caelyx(®), Schering-Plough), paclitaxel (Taxol(®), Bristol-Myers Squibb), trabectedin (Yondelis(®), PharmaMar) and gemcitabine (Gemzar(®), Eli Lilly and Company) for the treatment of advanced, recurrent ovarian cancer. DATA SOURCES: Electronic databases (MEDLINE(®), EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Health Technology Assessment database, NHS Economic Evaluations Database) and trial registries were searched, and company submissions were reviewed. Databases were searched from inception to May 2013. METHODS: A systematic review of the clinical and economic literature was carried out following standard methodological principles. Double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trials, evaluating topotecan, PLDH, paclitaxel, trabectedin and gemcitabine, and economic evaluations were included. A network meta-analysis (NMA) was carried out. A de novo economic model was developed. RESULTS: For most outcomes measuring clinical response, two networks were constructed: one evaluating platinum-based regimens and one evaluating non-platinum-based regimens. In people with platinum-sensitive disease, NMA found statistically significant benefits for PLDH plus platinum, and paclitaxel plus platinum for overall survival (OS) compared with platinum monotherapy. PLDH plus platinum significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) compared with paclitaxel plus platinum. Of the non-platinum-based treatments, PLDH monotherapy and trabectedin plus PLDH were found to significantly increase OS, but not PFS, compared with topotecan monotherapy. In people with platinum-resistant/-refractory (PRR) disease, NMA found no statistically significant differences for any treatment compared with alternative regimens in OS and PFS. Economic modelling indicated that, for people with platinum-sensitive disease and receiving platinum-based therapy, the estimated probabilistic incremental cost-effectiveness ratio [ICER; incremental cost per additional quality-adjusted life-year (QALY)] for paclitaxel plus platinum compared with platinum was £24,539. Gemcitabine plus carboplatin was extendedly dominated, and PLDH plus platinum was strictly dominated. For people with platinum-sensitive disease and receiving non-platinum-based therapy, the probabilistic ICERs associated with PLDH compared with paclitaxel, and trabectedin plus PLDH compared with PLDH, were estimated to be £25,931 and £81,353, respectively. Topotecan was strictly dominated. For people with PRR disease, the probabilistic ICER associated with topotecan compared with PLDH was estimated to be £324,188. Paclitaxel was strictly dominated. LIMITATIONS: As platinum- and non-platinum-based treatments were evaluated separately, the comparative clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of these regimens is uncertain in patients with platinum-sensitive disease. CONCLUSIONS: For platinum-sensitive disease, it was not possible to compare the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of platinum-based therapies with non-platinum-based therapies. For people with platinum-sensitive disease and treated with platinum-based therapies, paclitaxel plus platinum could be considered cost-effective compared with platinum at a threshold of £30,000 per additional QALY. For people with platinum-sensitive disease and treated with non-platinum-based therapies, it is unclear whether PLDH would be considered cost-effective compared with paclitaxel at a threshold of £30,000 per additional QALY; trabectedin plus PLDH is unlikely to be considered cost-effective compared with PLDH. For patients with PRR disease, it is unlikely that topotecan would be considered cost-effective compared with PLDH. Randomised controlled trials comparing platinum with non-platinum-based treatments might help to verify the comparative effectiveness of these regimens. STUDY REGISTRATION: This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42013003555. FUNDING: The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.

Facing up to the ongoing challenge of Kaposi's sarcoma.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Kaposi's sarcoma is a mesenchymal tumour caused by infection with human herpesvirus 8, usually in the context of immunodeficiency. The global incidence of Kaposi's sarcoma rose dramatically with the outbreak of HIV and AIDS. Although the introduction of combined antiretroviral therapy (cART) has seen a dramatic decline in Kaposi's sarcoma incidence, it remains a significant burden of morbidity and mortality, especially in sub-Saharan Africa. This review considers the most recent evidence regarding the prevalence, current treatment strategies and future therapies for Kaposi's sarcoma. RECENT FINDINGS: In the post-cART era, the epidemiology of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome-related Karposi sarcoma (AIDS-KS) is changing, with a rising incidence in the context of immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome, and this has important implications for cART rollout initiatives. The current best-available treatment strategies use cART either alone or in combination with systemic chemotherapy, and there is new evidence for a stage-stratified treatment algorithm to guide their use. In addition, a number of new, targeted therapies for Kaposi's sarcoma are under investigation. SUMMARY: The introduction of cART has not entirely removed the challenge of AIDS-KS. It is, however, an increasingly manageable disease, although issues of drug availability in sub-Saharan Africa remain to be addressed.

Cost-effectiveness of gemcitabine versus PEGylated liposomal doxorubicin for recurrent or progressive ovarian cancer: comparing chemotherapy with nanotherapy.

This article examines the cost-effectiveness of chemotherapy (gemcitabine) versus nanotherapy (PEGylated liposomal doxorubicin) in the treatment of ovarian cancer. Significant differences in costs were mainly due to the initial drug costs, which were €1285.28 in favor of chemotherapy. These costs were more than offset by hospitalization costs, which were €2670.21 in favor of the nanotherapy. The cost per quality-adjusted life week (QALW) for the nanotherapy was estimated to be €220.92/QALW for the base case and ranged from €170-318/QALW based on model assumptions. The clinical benefit associated with nanotherapy was achieved, yielding not only positive cost-effectiveness results, but also, surprisingly, financial savings. Although more studies are necessary, this first comprehensive analysis supports the further use of nanotherapy for ovarian cancer.

Mapping knowledge translation and innovation processes in Cancer Drug Development: the case of liposomal doxorubicin.

We explored how the knowledge translation and innovation processes are structured when theyresult in innovations, as in the case of liposomal doxorubicin research. In order to map the processes, a literature network analysis was made through Cytoscape and semantic analysis was performed by GOPubmed which is based in the controlled vocabularies MeSH (Medical Subject Headings) and GO (Gene Ontology). We found clusters related to different stages of the technological development (invention, innovation and imitation) and the knowledge translation process (preclinical, translational and clinical research), and we were able to map the historic emergence of Doxil as a paradigmatic nanodrug. This research could be a powerful methodological tool for decision-making and innovation management in drug delivery research.