Economic Implications of Dural Tears in Lumbar Microdiscectomies: A Retrospective, Observational Study.

OBJECTIVE: Dural tears (DTs) are a frequent complication after lumbar spine surgery. We sought to determine the incidence of DTs and the related impact on health care expenditures after lumbar discectomies. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, all patients with first-time single-level lumbar discectomies at our institution who underwent minimally invasive surgery from 2015 to 2019 were reviewed. Age, sex, weight, height, body mass index, costs, revenues, length of stay, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and operative time (OT) were assessed. Exclusion criteria were age <18 years, previous spine surgery, multiple or traumatic disc herniations, and malignant and infectious diseases. RESULTS: The follow-up time was at least 12 months postoperatively. Of 358 patients identified with lumbar discectomies, 230 met the inclusion criteria. Incidence of DTs was 3.5%. Mean costs (P < 0.001), economic loss (P < 0.01), and OT (P < 0.0001) were found to be significantly higher in the DT group compared with the control group of patients without a DT. The revenues were not statistically different between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). Further analysis of the control group by profit and loss revealed significantly higher body mass index (P < 0.05), length of stay (P < 0.0001), and OT (P < 0.0001) in the loss group. CONCLUSIONS: DTs represent a significant socioeconomic burden in lumbar spine surgery and cause severe secondary complications. The impact of DTs on health care expenses is primarily based on significantly higher OT and a higher mean length of stay.

Arachnoid Welding-A Simple and Economical Method of Arachnoid Closure to Prevent Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak.

BACKGROUND: Collection of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in the subdural compartment is a major cause of postoperative morbidity, especially for posterior fossa surgeries. Arachnoid closure techniques, including suturing of the arachnoid and use of synthetic sealants, have been described in the literature. However, they are not always feasible or effective and have not been universally adopted. METHODS: We describe the technique of arachnoid welding for a case of brainstem cavernoma. This is a simple, cost-effective, and easily reproducible technique using readily available bipolar cautery kept at a low-current setting. At the end of surgery, the arachnoid leaflets are closely approximated, and bipolar cautery is used to seal the edges together. An illustrative video shows the technical nuances of this procedure. This technique can also be applied for arachnoid closure at other cranial and spinal sites. RESULTS: Arachnoid closure can act as an effective natural barrier to keep CSF in its physiological subarachnoid compartment. It provides an additional barrier to prevent CSF leak. It also prevents morbidity associated with adhesions and arachnoiditis. Proper closure of arachnoid makes durotomy during repeat surgery much easier and avoids injury to the underlying pia. A brief review of related literature shows the benefits of closing the arachnoid before dural closure and the different techniques that have been described so far. CONCLUSIONS: The arachnoid welding technique has a wide application, is easy to learn, and can be used especially for posterior fossa surgeries in which rates of CSF leak are the highest.

Creation of low cost, simple, and easy-to-use training kit for the dura mater suturing in endoscopic transnasal pituitary/skull base surgery.

Training kits for laparoscopes for deep suturing under endoscopes are commercially available; however, previously reported training kits for endoscopic transnasal transsphenoidal pituitary/skull base surgery (eTSS) were not available in the market. Moreover, the previously reported low cost, self-made kit has the drawback of being unrealistic. This study aimed to create a low cost training kit for eTSS dura mater suturing that was as close to real as possible. Most necessary items were obtained from the 100-yen store ($1 store) or from everyday supplies. As an alternative to the endoscope, a stick-type camera was used. Through the assembly of the materials, a simple and easy-to-use training kit was created, which is almost identical to the actual dural suturing situation. In eTSS, a simple and easy-to-use training kit for dural suturing was successfully created at a low cost. This kit is expected to be used for deep suture operations and the development of surgical instruments for training.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Application of a Porcine-Derived Fibrin Sealant for the Treatment of Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak in China.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a porcine-derived fibrin sealant (PFS) for treating cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks in cranial surgery compared with sutures alone from the perspective of public hospital management in China. METHODS: A decision tree model of cranial surgery patients with intraoperative CSF leak was constructed in R 3.6.3. The cost-effectiveness of using PFS with dural sutures was compared versus using sutures alone. Efficacy and safety data were obtained from a randomized controlled, single-blinded clinical trial that enrolled 200 patients (NCT03110783). Effectiveness was measured as the success rate of CSF leak treatment and the rate of postoperative complication. Hospital procurement costs were used to provide cost measurements from the hospital administrator's perspective. FINDINGS: The PFS strategy had a higher success rate of CSF leak treatment (97.81% vs 49.21%) and a lower complication rate (9.49% vs 14.29%), based on results from the clinical trial. Using PFS also resulted in cost savings amounting to $374.97 in additional intraoperative CSF leak repairs ($18.07 vs $393.04) and $66.68 in postoperative complication treatment ($131.90 vs $198.58). Both one-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis confirmed that the model results were stable against input variations. IMPLICATIONS: The decision tree analysis revealed that using PFS in conjunction with sutures was associated with improved clinical performance and lower overall costs. PFS in combination with sutures is the dominant strategy for treating CSF leak from the perspective of hospital decision-makers.

Posttraumatic leptomeningeal cyst capsule as a cost-free autograft for its repair: case illustrated technical reports.

The surgical treatment of traumatic leptomeningeal cyst (LMC) is repair of the dural defect with or without cranioplasty. The dural substitutes used are either autografts (which may not be enough) or artificial grafts (which are foreign-body implantations and which also may be too expensive in a low-resource practice). In this report from a developing country, we present the surgical description of the use of the cyst capsule as a cost-free autologous graft in the surgical repair of the dural defects of two cases of traumatic leptomeningeal cyst.

A low cost dural closure simulation model for tomorrow's spinal neurosurgeons.

Introduction: We present a low cost model that can be used to improve a trainee's skills in spinal dural closure. Development of microsurgical skills in a simulated environment provides a safe environment in which patients are protected. We argue that this is likely to improve the quality of dural closure, especially for surgeons early in their training and may lead to a commensurate reduction in post-operative CSF leak. Method: In our model, two consultant spine surgeons assessed the ability of participants to close the spinal dura. Participants were scored both quantitatively (time taken to complete the task) and qualitatively under the category of "surgical performance"- assessed by video and inspection of the closed dural substitute. Results: The cohort under assessment included senior and newly appointed consultants, clinical fellows and thirteen specialty trainees. 10 trainees were assessed a second time and a significant majority improved on both domains: 8 (80%) were faster on their second attempt; surgical performance scores also improved in the majority of trainees (90%). Conclusion: Our results, albeit with small numbers, show that a large proportion of trainees improve with practice with a reduction in overall task time and an improvement in surgical performance. Our model is cost-effective and easy to reproduce: simulation need not be an expensive exercise. This study further validates the use of simulation in modern neurosurgical training.

Incidental Durotomy in Open Versus Tubular Revision Microdiscectomy: A Retrospective Controlled Study on Incidence, Management, and Outcome.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case-control study. OBJECTIVE: To compare the incidence, management, and outcome of incidental durotomy in revision microdiscectomy with open and minimal-access surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Incidental durotomy occurs with a variable incidence of 3%-27% in spine surgery. The highest rate occurs in revision microdiscectomy. The intraoperative and postoperative management of dural tears varies in the literature and the definite impact on clinical outcome has to be clarified. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of medical records of 135 patients who underwent revision microdiscectomy, divided into 2 subgroups: OPEN (n=82) versus minimal-access surgery (MINI, n=53). Occurrence of intraoperative dural tears, intraoperative and postoperative management of durotomy, and clinical outcomes, according to MacNab criteria, were retrospectively examined. Statistical comparisons for categorical values between groups were accomplished using the 2-tailed Fisher exact test. P-values <0.05 were considered to be statistically significant. RESULTS: The incidence of durotomy in group OPEN was 19.5% (n=16/82) and in group MINI 17.0% (n=9/53) (P=0.822). The majority of durotomies (23/25) were repaired with an absorbable fibrin sealant patch alone. Postoperative cerebrospinal fluid fistula occurred only in 1 case of the OPEN group and was treated with lumbar drainage without the need for a reoperation. Patients with durotomy of the MINI group tended to have better outcome compared with those of the OPEN group without being statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of durotomy and postoperative cerebrospinal fluid fistula in lumbar revision microdiscectomy does not significantly differ between minimal-access and standard open procedures. The application of a fibrin sealant patch alone is an effective strategy for dural repair in revision lumbar microdiscectomy.

The True Cost of a Dural Tear: Medical and Economic Ramifications of Incidental Durotomy During Lumbar Discectomy in Elderly Medicare Beneficiaries.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective database review. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify whether dural tears increase costs and the risk of wound complications and serious adverse events during the postoperative period following primary lumbar discectomy in elderly Medicare beneficiaries. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Rates of incidental durotomy during lumbar spine surgery range from 1% to 17%. The full economic and medical burden of this complication remains unclear, particularly as it occurs during lumbar discectomy in elderly patients. METHODS: The full set of prospectively gathered Medicare insurance data (2005-2012) was retrospectively reviewed. Patients who underwent primary lumbar discectomy for lumbar disc herniations from 2009 to quarter 3 of 2012 were selected. This cohort (n = 41,655) was then divided into two subgroups: those who were diagnosed with incidental durotomy on the day of surgery (n = 2052) and those who were not (control population). To select a more effective control population, patients of a similar age, gender, smoking status, diabetes mellitus status, chronic pulmonary disease status, and body mass index were chosen at random from the control population to create a control cohort. In-hospital costs, length of stay, and rates of 30-day readmission, 90-day wound complications, and 90-day serious adverse effects were compared. RESULTS: An incidental durotomy rate of 4.9% was observed. Higher rates of wound infection [2.4% vs. 1.3%; odds ratio (OR) 1.88; 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.31-2.70; P < 0.001], wound dehiscence (0.9% vs. 0.4%; OR 2.39; 95% CI: 1.31-4.37; P = 0.004), and serious adverse events related to incidental durotomy (0.9% vs. 0.2%; OR 4.10; 95% CI: 2.05-8.19; P < 0.0001) were observed in incidental durotomy patients. In-hospital costs were increased by over $4000 in patients with incidental durotomy (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Incidental durotomies occur in almost one in every 20 elderly patients treated with primary lumbar discectomy. Given the increased hospital costs and complication rates, this complication must be viewed as anything but benign. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Perifascial Areolar Tissue Graft for Spinal Dural Repair with Cerebrospinal Fluid Leakage: Case Report of Novel Graft Material, Radiological Assessment Technique, and Rare Postoperative Hydrocephalus.

BACKGROUND: Incidental durotomy is a relatively common complication in spinal surgeries, and treatment of persistent cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage is still challenging, especially in cases for which "watertight" suturing is inapplicable. The usefulness of a nonvascularized perifascial areolar tissue (PAT) graft recently was emphasized for plastic and skull base surgeries. Its hypervascularity allows for early engraftment and long-term survival, and its flexibility is advantageous in fixing defects of complex shapes in limited surgical spaces. CASE DESCRIPTION: The authors report a case of persistent CSF leakage after cervical spine surgery in which a PAT graft was used successfully for direct closure of the dural defect. The noninvasive, spin-labeled magnetic resonance imaging technique was used for postoperative assessment of CSF dynamics, not for CSF accumulation but for CSF leakage itself. In addition, some potential causes for the rare development of communicating hydrocephalus after cervical laminoplasty, as seen in this case, are discussed. CONCLUSIONS: PAT was used successfully as an alternative free graft material for direct spinal dural closure, and its hypervascularity seemed to assist with rapid resolution of CSF leakage in our case. Spin-labeled magnetic resonance imaging may enable assessment of spinal CSF dynamics without invasion.

A minimally invasive technique for decompression of Chiari malformation type I (DECMI study): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Chiari malformation type I (CM-I) is a congenital hindbrain anomaly that requires surgical decompression in symptomatic patients. Posterior fossa decompression with duraplasty (PFDD) has been widely practiced in Chiari decompression, but dural opening carries a high risk of surgical complications. A minimally invasive technique, dural splitting decompression (DSD), preserves the inner layer of the dura without dural opening and duraplasty, potentially reducing surgical complications, length of operative time and hospital stay, and cost. If DSD is non-inferior to PFDD in terms of clinical improvement, DSD could be an alternative treatment modality for CM-I. So far, no randomised study of surgical treatment of CM-I has been reported. This study aims to evaluate if DSD is an effective, safe and cost-saving treatment modality for adult CM-I patients, and may provide evidence for using the minimally invasive procedure extensively. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: DECMI is a randomised controlled, single-masked, non-inferiority, single centre clinical trial. Participants meeting the criteria will be randomised to the DSD group and the PFDD group in a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome is the rate of clinical improvement, which is defined as the complete resolution or partial improvement of the presenting symptoms/signs. The secondary outcomes consist of the incidence of syrinx reduction, postoperative morbidity rates, reoperation rate, quality of life (QoL) and healthcare resource utilisation. A total of 160 patients will be included and followed up at 3 and 12 months postoperatively. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol was approved by the Biological and Medical Ethics Committee of West China Hospital. The findings of this trial will be published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal and presented at scientific conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR-TRC-14004099.

National trends, complications, and hospital charges in pediatric patients with Chiari malformation type I treated with posterior fossa decompression with and without duraplasty.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of type 1 Chiari malformation (CM-1) with posterior fossa decompression without (PFD) or with duraplasty (PFDD) is controversial. The authors analyze both options in a national sample of pediatric patients. METHODS: Utilizing the Kids' Inpatient Database, CM-1 patients undergoing PFD or PFDD from 2000 through 2009 were analyzed. RESULTS: 1,593 patients with PFD and 1,056 with PFDD were evaluated. The average age was 10.3 years, slightly younger in PFD (9.8 vs. 10.9 years, p = 0.001). PFDD patients were more likely White (81.2 vs 75.6%, p = 0.04) and less likely admitted emergently (8.4 vs. 13.8%, p = 0.007). They also underwent more reoperations (2.1 vs. 0.7%, p = 0.01), had more procedure-related complications (2.3 vs. 0.8%, p = 0.003), a longer length of stay (4.4 vs. 3.8 days, p = 0.001) and higher charges (USD 35,321 vs. 31,483, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: This large national study indicates that PFDD is performed more often in Caucasians, less so emergently, and associated with significantly more complications and immediate reoperations, while PFD is more frequent in those with syringomyelia and more economical, requiring fewer hospital resources. Overall, PFD is more favorable for CM-1, though it would be prudent to conduct a prospective trial, as this analysis is limited by data on preoperative presentations and long-term outcomes.

Is Simpson grade I removal necessary in all cases of spinal meningioma? Assessment of postoperative recurrence during long-term follow-up.

It is generally accepted that the first choice of treatment for spinal meningiomas is "radical" surgical removal. However, Simpson grade I removal is sometimes difficult, especially in cases with ventral dural attachment, because of the risk of spinal cord damage or the difficulty of dural repair after radical resection. In addition, there is no consensus on a surgical strategy for radicality, whether or not Simpson grade I resection should be performed in all cases of spinal meningioma. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed clinical and radiological data of surgically treated 14 patients with spinal meningioma, to assess the influence of the Simpson grade to tumor recurrences during long-term follow-up (median 8.2 years, 1.3-27.9). The number of patients in Simpson grades I, II, III, and IV were 2, 8, 0, and 3, respectively; Simpson grading was not applicable to one patient with non-dura-based meningioma. No postoperative permanent neurological worsening was encountered. The recurrence rate was 21.4% (3 out of 14 cases). Of these 3 recurrent cases, 1 was a case of non-dura-based meningioma and another was a case of neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2); both of them are known as risk factors for recurrence after surgical removal of spinal meningiomas. Considering this background of these two recurrences, the clinical results of the present study are consistent with previous results. Therefore, we propose that surgeons do not always have to achieve Simpson grade I removal if dural repair is complicated and postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage or neurological worsening are estimated after resection of dural attachment and repair of dural defect.

Dural involvement in skull base tumors--accuracy of preoperative radiological evaluation and intraoperative assessment.

BACKGROUND: Dural involvement is an important consideration in assessment of cranial base tumors dictating resectability and prognosis. Preoperative as well as intraoperative clues are valuable but not always correct. We evaluated a consecutive series of craniofacial resections at our center to correlate radiologically suspected dural involvement vis-à-vis intraoperative assessment and eventual pathology. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of cases of skull base tumors where potential dural involvement was considered. We recorded the preoperative radiological impression (contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging) regarding dural involvement (normal, extradural, intradural, parenchymal disease), intraoperative impression (normal, adherent, subdural, parenchymal disease), and final histology (normal, reactive, tumor). We also recorded instances where the dura was resected and/or inadvertently breached and the incidence of postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak and meningitis. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-seven cases were evaluated. Transcranial approaches were performed in 68 cases. Nineteen percent (24 cases) were endoscopic procedures. Dural resection was performed in 38 cases (30 being proven pathologically). The incidence of cerebrospinal fluid leak was 4.7%. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of magnetic resonance assessment were 34.5%, 97.9%, 83.3%, and 83.2%, respectively, providing an overall accuracy of 84%, and those for intraoperative dural adherence were 84.6%, 85.6%, 44%, 97.6%, and 85.5.%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging, although a good modality for imaging the disease extent, may not always identify the extent of dural involvement. Intraoperative assessment therefore becomes very important especially when it is unequivocally normal. Both should be used to ensure accurate treatment strategies and tailor the need for dural resection.

Dural involvement in skull base tumors-accuracy of preoperative radiological evaluation and intraoperative assessment.

BACKGROUND: Dural involvement is an important consideration in assessment of cranial base tumors dictating resectability and prognosis. Preoperative as well as intraoperative clues are valuable but not always correct. We evaluated a consecutive series of craniofacial resections at our center to correlate radiologically suspected dural involvement vis-à-vis intraoperative assessment and eventual pathology. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of cases of skull base tumors where potential dural involvement was considered. We recorded the preoperative radiological impression (contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging) regarding dural involvement (normal, extradural, intradural, parenchymal disease), intraoperative impression (normal, adherent, subdural, parenchymal disease), and final histology (normal, reactive, tumor). We also recorded instances where the dura was resected and/or inadvertently breached and the incidence of postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak and meningitis. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-seven cases were evaluated. Transcranial approaches were performed in 68 cases. Nineteen percent (24 cases) were endoscopic procedures. Dural resection was performed in 38 cases (30 being proven pathologically). The incidence of cerebrospinal fluid leak was 4.7%. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of magnetic resonance assessment were 34.5%, 97.9%, 83.3%, and 83.2%, respectively, providing an overall accuracy of 84%, and those for intraoperative dural adherence were 84.6%, 85.6%, 44%, 97.6%, and 85.5.%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging, although a good modality for imaging the disease extent, may not always identify the extent of dural involvement. Intraoperative assessment therefore becomes very important especially when it is unequivocally normal. Both should be used to ensure accurate treatment strategies and tailor the need for dural resection.

Dura splitting decompression for Chiari I malformation in pediatric patients: clinical outcomes, healthcare costs, and resource utilization.

BACKGROUND: Dural splitting decompression may be an effective and safe treatment for Chiari I malformation. OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical outcomes, complications, and resource utilization for patients undergoing Chiari I decompression with or without duraplasty. METHODS: Between 2000 and 2009, the senior author performed 113 Chiari I decompression operations with dural splitting or duraplasty in children less than 18 years of age; 110 were included in a retrospective cohort analysis of safety, efficacy, and treatment cost. Patients without significant syringomyelia underwent dural splitting decompression, and patients with syringomyelia underwent duraplasty. RESULTS: : Sixty-three patients without significant syringomyelia (57%) underwent dural splitting decompression. They were significantly younger than patients undergoing duraplasty (8.3 ± 4.9 years vs 10.4 ± 4.4 years; P < .05). Headaches improved or resolved in most patients in both groups (90.5% vs 93.6%; P = .59). Dysphagia, long tract signs, cranial nerve, and bulbar symptoms also improved similarly in both groups. Three duraplasty patients were treated medically for aseptic meningitis; one underwent reoperation for a symptomatic pseudomeningocele. No patient undergoing dural splitting decompression experienced a cerebrospinal fluid-related complication. Extradural decompression required less operative time than duraplasty (105.5 vs 168.9 minutes, P < .001), a shorter length of stay (2.4 vs 2.8 days, P = .011), and lower total cost for the primary hospitalization ($26 837 vs $29 862, P = .015). CONCLUSION: In this retrospective cohort study, dural splitting decompression was equally effective, safer, and lower cost for treatment of Chiari I malformation without syringomyelia. A multicenter trial with groups balanced for the presence of syringomyelia is necessary to determine whether these results are generalizable.

Incidental durotomy during spine surgery: incidence, management and complications. A retrospective review.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of a series of patients who underwent spinal surgery at a single spine unit during a 1 year period. OBJECTIVES: To assess the incidence, treatment, clinical consequence, complications of incidental durotomy during spine surgery and results of 37 months clinical follow-up. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Incidental durotomy is an underestimated and relatively adverse event during spinal surgery. Several consequences of inadequately treated dural tears have been reported. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted on 1326 consecutive patients who underwent spinal surgery performed in one French spine unit from January 2005 to December 2005. We excluded from this study patients treated for emergency spine cases. RESULTS: Fifty-one dural tears were identified (3.84%). Incidental durotomies were associated with anterior cervical approach in 1 case, with posterior cervical approach in 1 case, with anterior retroperitoneal approach in 1 case and with posterior thoracolumbar approach in 48 cases. In addition, any clinically significant durotomy unrecognised during surgical procedure were included. Thirteen patients presented postoperative complications including 7 cerebrospinal fluid leaks, 2 wound infections, 2 postoperative haematomas, and 2 pseudomeningoceles. Nine of these 13 patients required a revision procedure. A mean follow-up of 37 months showed good long-term clinical results. CONCLUSIONS: Incidental durotomy is a common complication of spine surgery. All incidental durotomies must be repaired primarily. Dural tears that were immediately recognised and treated accordingly did not lead to any significant sequelae at a mean follow-up of 37 months. However, long-term follow-up studies will be needed to confirm this finding. The risks associated with dural tears and cerebrospinal fluid leaks are serious and should be discussed with any patients undergoing spine surgery.

Incidence of symptomatic retethering after surgical management of pediatric tethered cord syndrome with or without duraplasty.

BACKGROUND: Cord retethering and other postoperative complications can occur after the surgical untethering of a first-time symptomatic tethered cord. It is unclear if using duraplasty vs. primary dural closure in the initial operation is associated with decreased incidence of either immediate postoperative complications or subsequent symptomatic retethering. It is also unclear if different etiologies are associated with different outcomes after each method of closure. We reviewed our pediatric experience in first-time surgical untethering of symptomatic tethered cord syndrome (TCS) to identify the incidence of postoperative complications and symptomatic retethering after duraplasty vs. primary closure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 110 consecutive pediatric (<18 years old) cases of first-time symptomatic spinal cord untethering at our institution over a 10-year period. Incidence of postoperative complications and symptomatic retethering were compared in cases with duraplasty vs. primary dural closure use. RESULTS: Mean age was 5.7 +/- 4.8 years old. "Complex" etiologies included lipomyelomeningocele or prior lipomyelomeningocele repair in 22 (20%) patients, prior myelomeningocele repair in 35 (32%), and concurrent lumbosacral lipoma in 18 (16%). "Noncomplex etiologies" included fatty filum in 26 (24%) and split cord malformation in five (4%). Seventy-five (68%) cases underwent primary dural closure vs. 35 (32%) with duraplasty. Twenty-nine (26%) patients experienced symptomatic retethering at a median [interquartile range (IQR)] of 30.5 [20.75-41.75] months postoperatively. There was no difference in incidence of postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak, surgical site infection, or median [IQR] length of stay in patients receiving primary dural closure [4 (5%), 7 (9%), and 5 (4-6) days, respectively] vs. duraplasty [3 (9%), 3 (9%), and 6 [5-8] days, respectively], p > 0.05. Complex etiologies were more likely to retether than noncomplex etiologies after primary closure (33.6% vs. 6.6%, p = 0.05) but not after duraplasty (13.7% vs. 5.4%, p = 0.33). Duraplasty graft type (polytetrafluoroethylene vs. bovine pericardium) was not associated with pseudomeningocele or retethering. CONCLUSION: In our experience, the increased rate of symptomatic retethering observed with complex pediatric TCS (pTCS) etiologies after primary dural closures was not observed when duraplasty was instituted. Expansile duraplasty may be valuable specifically in the management of patient subgroups with complex pTCS etiologies.

Watertight dural closure: is it necessary? A prospective randomized trial in patients with supratentorial craniotomies.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the current study was to prospectively analyze complication rates and costs associated with dural closure in patients undergoing supratentorial craniotomies, randomized for watertight and adaptive dural closures. METHODS: One hundred fifty consecutive patients with supratentorial lesions who were between 18 and 70 years of age were prospectively included. A watertight dural closure was the primary goal (Group A). Whenever this goal could not be achieved, patients were intraoperatively randomized for secondary watertight (Group B) or adaptive dural closure (Group C). Within a follow-up period of 4 weeks, study end points were the occurrence of complications such as subcutaneous fluid collections, impaired wound healing with and without cerebrospinal fluid leakage, and infection. Moreover, we analyzed costs for dural closure for each group separately. RESULTS: Of 150 eligible patients, 13 were excluded according to predefined criteria (Group A, n = 3; Group B, n = 7; Group C, n = 3). From those patients, a primary watertight dural closure could be obtained in 44 (29.4%) patients. A secondary watertight dural closure was performed in 53 (35.3%) patients, and an adaptive dural closure was performed in 53 (35.3%) patients. Complications that were related to dural closure or wound closure were found in 7 patients in Group A, 6 patients in Group B, and 12 patients in Group C (all not significant). The mean total costs, based on time and additional material required in Group A (US $436 +/- 119) or Group B (US $681 +/- 286) were significantly greater compared with adaptive dural closure in Group C (US $213 +/- 142, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In supratentorial craniotomies, an adaptive dural closure may represent a safe and cost-effective alternative to watertight dural closure.