RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of online behavioral interventions (EczemaCareOnline.org.uk) designed to support eczema self-care management for parents/carers and young people from an NHS perspective. METHODS: Two within-trial economic evaluations, using regression-based approaches, adjusting for baseline and pre-specified confounder variables, were undertaken alongside two independent, pragmatic, parallel group, unmasked randomized controlled trials, recruiting through primary care. Trial 1 recruited 340 parents/carers of children aged 0-12 years and Trial 2 337 young people aged 13-25 years with eczema scored ≥ 5 on Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM). Participants were randomized (1:1) to online intervention plus usual care or usual care alone. Resource use, collected via medical notes review, was valued using published unit costs in UK £Sterling 2021. Quality-of-life was elicited using proxy CHU-9D in Trial 1 and self-report EQ-5D-5L in Trial 2. RESULTS: The intervention was dominant (cost saving and more effective) with a high probability of cost-effectiveness (> 68%) in most analyses. The exception was the complete case cost-utility analysis for Trial 1 (omitting participants with children aged < 2), with adjusted incremental cost savings of -£34.15 (95% CI - 104.54 to 36.24) and incremental QALYs of - 0.003 (95% CI - 0.021 to 0.015) producing an incremental cost per QALY of £12,466. In the secondary combined (Trials 1 and 2) cost-effectiveness analysis, the adjusted incremental cost was -£20.35 (95% CI - 55.41 to 14.70) with incremental success (≥ 2-point change on POEM) of 10.3% (95% CI 2.3-18.1%). CONCLUSION: The free at point of use online eczema self-management intervention was low cost to run and cost-effective. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered prospectively with the ISRCTN registry (ISRCTN79282252). URL www.EczemaCareOnline.org.uk .
Assuntos
Análise Custo-Benefício , Eczema , Autocuidado , Humanos , Eczema/terapia , Eczema/economia , Adolescente , Feminino , Criança , Autocuidado/economia , Masculino , Pré-Escolar , Adulto , Adulto Jovem , Lactente , Pais , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Cuidadores/economia , Qualidade de Vida , Reino Unido , Recém-Nascido , Intervenção Baseada em Internet/economia , Medicina Estatal/economiaRESUMO
Objectives: Atopic dermatitis, or eczema, is an inflammatory illness that impacts individuals of all ages. The cost of treating AD and the impact on the quality of life have not been well documented in the state of Nevada. This study seeks to fill this gap by identifying factors that impact the cost of AD in the state utilizing clinical and patient demographics. Methods: ANOVA with Bonferroni adjustment was performed using a large hospital utilization database to examine the cost of AD in the state of Nevada across all hospital settings. Results: Several significant factors were associated with the overall cost of AD in Nevada, including hospital setting type (outpatient vs. inpatient), physician type, region, AD diagnosis level, and age (p < 0.05). Stratified analysis was performed by setting type. In the inpatient setting, region, diagnosis level, and records with age listed between 0 and 5 years remained significant (p < 0.05). In the outpatient setting, physician type, region, and African American race remained significant (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Data from this study indicate that the AD cost burden is dependent on both demographic and clinical factors in the state of Nevada. These differences suggest that patients with AD may encounter higher costs depending on age, race, and clinical factors.
Assuntos
Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Dermatite Atópica/economia , Prescrições de Medicamentos/economia , Eczema/economia , Adulto , Dermatite Atópica/dietoterapia , Eczema/dietoterapia , Feminino , Serviços de Saúde/economia , Humanos , Reembolso de Seguro de Saúde/economia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , NevadaAssuntos
Dermatite Atópica/economia , Dermatite Atópica/terapia , Eczema/economia , Eczema/terapia , Financiamento Pessoal , Adulto , Feminino , França , Humanos , MasculinoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Eczema, which is synonymous with atopic eczema, is classified as a complex, chronic, and relapsing inflammatory skin condition, affecting both adults and children. However, there has not been any research into health-care expenditure to evaluate the medical cost of eczema from patients' perspective in Vietnam. This retrospective study aimed to fill in the gap concerning the medical cost of eczema treatment from patients' perspective. METHODS: Data from Ho Chi Minh City Hospital of Dermato Venereology's electronic medical database on demographics and drug therapy from June 2016 to May 2017 were collected. The patients who met the study's criteria were included in the study and were then categorized as mild, moderate, and severe according to received treatment level. Bootstrapping methods were used to evaluate average and emphasized the difference of cost burden adjusted by factors. RESULTS: A total of 6,212 patients (52.1% women and 85% urban residents) participated in the study; they were divided into three groups according to treatment stage: mild (n = 3,159, 50.9%), moderate (n = 599, 9.6%), and severe (n = 2,454, 39.5%). The evaluated total cost for the three groups was 5,255.82, 1,064.03, and 5,8154.60 US dollars, respectively; the average expenditure per patient per year was around $12.11 ($11.63-12.59). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggested that the estimated direct medical cost of eczema treatment was much lower than that in the Western countries, mostly because of insurance coverage. The findings provide useful insights into health economic evaluations and treatment costs of eczema in Vietnam.
Assuntos
Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Dermatite Atópica/economia , Gastos em Saúde , Adolescente , Corticosteroides/economia , Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Assistência Ambulatorial/economia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Dermatite Atópica/tratamento farmacológico , Custos de Medicamentos , Eczema/economia , Emolientes/economia , Emolientes/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Hospitais Públicos , Humanos , Imunossupressores/economia , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Vietnã , Adulto JovemRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Systemic treatment with alitretinoin is registered for all clinical types of severe chronic hand eczema. However, it is especially effective in the hyperkeratotic subtype and less effective in non-hyperkeratotic forms. Cyclosporine A (cyclosporine) is prescribed for hand eczema in daily practice as well. It has shown to be particularly effective in patients with vesicular hand eczema. The primary objective of this study is to compare efficacy of alitretinoin and cyclosporine in the treatment of severe recurrent vesicular hand eczema. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is an investigator-initiated randomised prospective open-label trial with blinded outcome assessment. Severity assessments and laboratory measurements will be conducted corresponding to daily practice. The study population will consist of 72 adult patients (age 18-75 years) with severe recurrent vesicular hand eczema. Patients are treated with either (group I) alitretinoin 30 mg once daily or (group II) cyclosporine with a starting dose of 5 mg/kg/day and a decrease in dosage after 8 weeks to 3-3.5 mg/kg/day. The treatment period is 24 weeks for both drugs. Primary endpoint for efficacy is response to treatment, defined as an improvement of ≥2 steps on a Physician Global Assessment, using a validated Photoguide, after 24 weeks of treatment. Secondary endpoints are improvement of Hand Eczema Severity Index, Quality of Life in Hand Eczema Questionnaire and a Patient Global Assessment. Adverse events and time to response will be registered. Furthermore, cost-utility, quality-adjusted life years and cost-effectiveness will be assessed with the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire while monitoring costs. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This protocol was reviewed and approved by the Medical Ethical Review Board of the University Medical Centre Groningen (reference METc 2015/375). The study will be conducted according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki, in accordance with the Dutch Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03026946; Pre-results.
Assuntos
Alitretinoína/uso terapêutico , Ciclosporina/uso terapêutico , Eczema/tratamento farmacológico , Dermatoses da Mão/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Alitretinoína/efeitos adversos , Doença Crônica , Ciclosporina/efeitos adversos , Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapêutico , Eczema/economia , Feminino , Dermatoses da Mão/economia , Humanos , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente , Gravidez , Estudos Prospectivos , Psicometria , Qualidade de Vida , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Eczema and asthma are chronic diseases with onset usually before the age of 5 years. More than 50% of individuals with eczema will develop asthma and/or other allergic diseases. Several loss-of-function mutations in filaggrin (FLG) have been identified in patients with eczema. However, the association of FLG with healthcare use is unknown. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether FLG mutations are associated with increased prescribing for eczema and asthma and whether increased prescribing is associated with increased healthcare costs. METHODS: A secondary analysis of BREATHE, a cross-sectional study of gene-environment associations with asthma severity, was undertaken. BREATHE data was collected for 1100 participants with asthma, in Tayside and Fife, Scotland during the period 2003-2005. Through collaboration with the Health Informatics Centre in Dundee, BREATHE was linked to accident and emergency, community prescribing and Scottish morbidity records. The data linkage allowed longitudinal exploration of associations between genetic variation and prescribing. RESULTS: An association was found between FLG mutations and increased prescribing for mild and moderate eczema, asthma-reliever medicine and asthma exacerbations. A strong association was found between FLG mutations and prescribing of emollients [incidence rate ratio (IRR) 2·19, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1·36-3·52], treatment for severe eczema (IRR 2·18, 95% CI 1·22-3·91) and a combination of a long-acting ß2 -agonist and corticosteroids (IRR 3·29, 95% CI 1·68-6·43). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of FLG mutations in this cohort is associated with increased prescribing for eczema and asthma. Randomized controlled trials are required to determine if these individuals could benefit from management strategies to reduce morbidity and treatment costs.
Assuntos
Asma/terapia , Doença Crônica/terapia , Eczema/terapia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Proteínas de Filamentos Intermediários/genética , Proteínas S100/genética , Adolescente , Adulto , Antiasmáticos/economia , Antiasmáticos/uso terapêutico , Asma/economia , Asma/genética , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Doença Crônica/economia , Estudos Transversais , Análise Mutacional de DNA , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Eczema/economia , Eczema/genética , Emolientes/economia , Emolientes/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Proteínas Filagrinas , Predisposição Genética para Doença , Hospitalização/economia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Mutação com Perda de Função , Masculino , Medicamentos sob Prescrição/economia , Medicamentos sob Prescrição/uso terapêutico , Escócia , Fatores de Tempo , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Little is known about the usage and financial burden of emergency care visits for atopic dermatitis (AD) or eczema (AD-E) in the United States. OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence, risk factors, and cost of emergency care for AD-E in the United States. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of the 2006-2012 National Emergency Department Sample, including a 20% sample of emergency department (ED) visits throughout the United States (n = 198,102,435). RESULTS: The mean annual incidence of ED visits with a primary diagnosis of AD-E was 3368.4-3553.0 cases/1 million persons. The prevalence of ED visits for AD-E increased significantly during 2006-2012 (survey logistic regression, P < .05). ED visits with a primary diagnosis of AD-E versus ED visits without were associated with younger patient age, Medicaid or no insurance, and lower household income quartile and more likely to occur during weekends and summer months. The geometric mean and total costs of ED visits for AD-E significantly increased from $369.07 and $127,275,080, respectively, in 2006 to $642.10 and $265,541,084, respectively, in 2012. LIMITATIONS: The National Emergency Department Sample did not include data on AD severity, recurrent ED visits, race/ethnicity, or treatments provided. CONCLUSION: There is a substantial and increasing financial burden of ED visits for AD-E in the United States. Interventions are needed to decrease ED visits for AD.
Assuntos
Dermatite Atópica/economia , Eczema/economia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Adolescente , Adulto , Plantão Médico/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos Transversais , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/tendências , Humanos , Renda , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco , Estações do Ano , Estados Unidos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Chronic diseases now represent a cost majority in the United States health care system. Contributing factors to rising costs include expensive novel and emerging therapies, under-treatment of disease, under-management of comorbidities, and patient dissatisfaction with care results. Critical to identifying replicable improvement methods is a reliable model to measure value. STUDY DESIGN: If we understand value within healthcare consumerism to be equal to a patient's health outcome improvement over costs associated with care (Value=Outcomes/Costs), we can use this equation to measure the improvement of value. METHODS: Research and literature show that patient activation-the skills and confidence that equip patients to become actively engaged in their health care-impact health outcomes, costs, and patient experience. Reaching patient activation through engagement methods including shared decision-making (SDM) lead to improved value of care received. The National Eczema Association (NEA) Shared Decision-Making Resource Center can be a transformative strategy to measure and evaluate value of health care interventions for eczema patients to advance a value-driven health care system in the United States. RESULTS: Through this Resource Center, NEA will measure patient value through their own perceptions using validated PRO instruments and other patient-generated health data. CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of this data will reveal findings that can assist researchers in evaluating the impact this care framework on patient-perceived value across other chronic diseases.
Assuntos
Eczema/economia , Eczema/terapia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Avaliação de Processos em Cuidados de Saúde/economia , Melhoria de Qualidade/economia , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde/economia , Distinções e Prêmios , Doença Crônica , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Análise Custo-Benefício , Tomada de Decisões , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Eczema/diagnóstico , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/normas , Humanos , Modelos Econômicos , Participação do Paciente/economia , Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente , Avaliação de Processos em Cuidados de Saúde/normas , Melhoria de Qualidade/normas , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde/normas , Participação dos Interessados , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Previous trials have demonstrated reductions in atopic dermatitis (AD) incidence when healthy, high-risk, non-exclusively breastfed infants were fed until four months of age with 100% whey-based partially hydrolysed formula (PHF-W) versus standard cow's milk formula (CMF). We assessed the cost-effectiveness of this intervention in Singapore. METHODS: Modelling techniques were used to simulate, from birth to Month 30, the incidence and clinical/economic burden of AD in high-risk, non-exclusively breastfed infants fed with PHF-W or CMF for up to four months. Epidemiologic and clinical data were from a local comparative trial. Expert opinion informed AD treatment patterns and outcomes. Outcomes included reduction in AD risk, time spent with AD, days without AD flare, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and direct/indirect costs. Multivariate probabilistic sensitivity analysis was used to assess model parameter uncertainty. RESULTS: Over 30 months, with the use of PHF-W instead of CMF, the proportion of children who developed AD and the time spent with AD decreased by 16.0% (28.3% vs. 44.3%) and 6.4 months, respectively, while time without AD flare and QALYs increased by 14.9 days and 0.021 QALYs per patient, respectively. Estimated AD-related discounted costs per child for PHF-W and CMF were SGD 771 and SGD 1,309, respectively (net savings: SGD 538). PHF-W was less expensive and more effective than CMF for 73%, and cost less than SGD 50,000 per QALY for 87% of all multivariate simulations. CONCLUSION: Early short-term nutritional intervention with PHF-W instead of CMF may reduce AD incidence and costs for healthy, high-risk, non-exclusively breastfed infants in Singapore.
Assuntos
Dermatite Atópica/economia , Dermatite Atópica/prevenção & controle , Fórmulas Infantis/química , Fórmulas Infantis/economia , Hipersensibilidade a Leite/prevenção & controle , Animais , Bovinos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Eczema/economia , Eczema/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Hidrólise , Incidência , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Cadeias de Markov , Leite , Modelos Econômicos , Análise Multivariada , Probabilidade , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Fatores de Risco , Comportamento de Redução do Risco , Singapura/epidemiologia , Proteínas do Soro do LeiteRESUMO
BACKGROUND: There is a lack of data on the burden of atopic dermatitis (AD) in adults relative to the general population. OBJECTIVE: To characterize the AD burden in adult patients relative to both matched non-AD controls and matched patients with psoriasis in terms of comorbidities, health care resource utilization (HCRU), and costs. METHODS: Adults (≥18 years) who self-reported a diagnosis of AD or psoriasis and adult non-AD controls were identified from the 2013 US National Health and Wellness Survey. Patients with AD were propensity score-matched with non-AD controls and patients with psoriasis on demographic variables. Patient-reported outcomes were analyzed between matched cohorts. RESULTS: Patients with AD had a significantly greater risk for atopic comorbidities, as well as significantly greater HCRU and total cost compared with non-AD controls. The burden of AD was generally comparable to that of psoriasis, although patients with AD reported increased use of emergency room visits compared with patients with psoriasis. LIMITATIONS: Patient-reported data are susceptible to recall bias and erroneous classification. CONCLUSIONS: Adult patients with AD reported a substantial disease burden, suggesting an unmet need for more effective AD treatment options.
Assuntos
Dermatite Atópica/economia , Dermatite Atópica/epidemiologia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Recursos em Saúde/economia , Recursos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Intervalos de Confiança , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Dermatite Atópica/diagnóstico , Dermatite Atópica/terapia , Eczema/diagnóstico , Eczema/economia , Eczema/epidemiologia , Eczema/terapia , Feminino , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Psoríase/diagnóstico , Psoríase/economia , Psoríase/epidemiologia , Psoríase/terapia , Valores de Referência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Health utilities provide a universally applicable method for measuring the relative preferences or values of specific health states. Health economic studies use health utilities to estimate disease burden and the cost-effectiveness of interventions. Chronic hand eczema (CHE) affects many individuals and adversely affects work productivity. Health utilities for CHE from the perspective of healthcare professionals are lacking. OBJECTIVES: To assess health utilities for CHE from the perspectives of employees in the healthcare sector and affected patients. METHODS: A cross-sectional study with volunteers from the healthcare sector (n = 126) and patients (n = 32) was conducted to establish health utilities (ranging from 1 = perfect health to 0 = death) for mild and severe CHE. RESULTS: The median health utilities of the healthy volunteers derived with the time trade-off method were 0.97 (mean: 0.92) for mild CHE and 0.77 (mean: 0.75) for severe CHE. The median health utilities for mild and severe CHE from the perspective of affected patients were 0.98 (mean: 0.91) and 0.82 (mean: 0.77), respectively. Differences in health utilities between the two study groups were not significant. CONCLUSION: CHE constitutes a considerable burden from the perspective of healthcare employees. Effective control of CHE constitutes an important public health goal.
Assuntos
Dermatite Ocupacional , Eczema , Dermatoses da Mão , Setor de Assistência à Saúde , Nível de Saúde , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Doença Crônica , Estudos Transversais , Dermatite Ocupacional/economia , Eczema/economia , Feminino , Dermatoses da Mão/economia , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde/economia , Hospitais Universitários , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Qualidade de Vida , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores Sexuais , Escala Visual Analógica , Adulto JovemRESUMO
AIMS: To evaluate practice patterns in the management of cow's milk protein allergy (CMPA) and associated economic burden of disease on health service in Turkey. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was based on experts' views on the practice patterns in management of CMPA manifesting with either proctocolitis or eczema symptoms and, thereby, aimed to estimate economic burden of CMPA. Practice patterns were determined via patient flow charts developed by experts using the modified Delphi method for CMPA presented with proctocolitis and eczema. Per patient total 2-year direct medical costs were calculated, including cost items of physician visits, laboratory tests, and treatment. RESULTS: According to the consensus opinion of experts, 2-year total direct medical cost from a payer perspective and societal perspective was calculated to be $US2,116.05 and $US2,435.84, respectively, in an infant with CMPA presenting with proctocolitis symptoms, and $US4,001.65 and $US4,828.90, respectively, in an infant with CMPA presenting with eczema symptoms. Clinical nutrition was the primary cost driver that accounted for 89-92% of 2-year total direct medical costs, while the highest total direct medical cost estimated from a payer perspective and societal perspective was noted for the management of an exclusively formula-fed infant presenting either with proctocolitis ($US3,743.85 and $US4,025.63, respectively) or eczema ($US6,854.10 and $US7,917.30, respectively). The first line use of amino acid based formula (AAF) was associated with total direct cost increment $US1,848.08 and $US3,444.52 in the case of proctocolitis and eczema, respectively. LIMITATIONS: Certain limitations to this study should be considered. First, being focused only on direct costs, the lack of data on indirect costs or intangible costs of illness seems to be a major limitation of the present study, which likely results in a downward bias in the estimates of the economic cost of CMPA. Second, given the limited number of studies concerning epidemiology and practice patterns in CMPA in Turkey, use of expert clinical opinion of the panel members rather than real-life data on practice patterns that were used to identify direct medical costs might raise a concern with the validity and reliability of the data. Also, while this was a three-step study with six experts included in the first stage (developing local guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of infants with CMPA in Turkey) and 410 pediatricians included in the second stage (a cross-sectional questionnaire-survey to determine pediatricians' awareness and practice of CMPA in infants and children), only four members were included in the present Delphi panel, which allows a limited discussion. Third, lack of sensitivity analyses and exclusion of indirect costs and costs related to alterations in quality of life, behavior of infants, and general well-being of infants and their parents from the cost-analysis seems to be another limitation that may have caused under-estimation of relative cost-effectiveness of the formulae. Fourth, calculation of costs per local guidelines rather than real-life practice patterns is another limitation that, otherwise, would extend the knowledge achieved in the current study. Notwithstanding these limitations, the present expert panel provided practice patterns in the management of CMPA and an estimate of the associated costs, depending on the symptom profile at initial admission for the first time in Turkey. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, in providing the first health economic data on CMPA in Turkey, the findings revealed that CMPA imposes a substantial burden on the Turkish healthcare system from both a payer perspective and societal perspective, and indicated clinical nutrition as a primary cost driver. Management of infants presenting with eczema, exclusively formula-fed infants, and first line use of AAF were associated with higher estimates for 2-year direct medical costs.
Assuntos
Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hipersensibilidade a Leite/economia , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Estudos Transversais , Técnica Delphi , Eczema/economia , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Fórmulas Infantis/economia , Masculino , Hipersensibilidade a Leite/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidade a Leite/terapia , Modelos Econométricos , Visita a Consultório Médico/economia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Proctocolite/economia , Qualidade de Vida , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , TurquiaAssuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Aprovação de Drogas/economia , Eczema/tratamento farmacológico , Anticorpos Monoclonais/economia , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Eczema/economia , Humanos , Subunidade alfa de Receptor de Interleucina-4/antagonistas & inibidores , Subunidade alfa de Receptor de Interleucina-4/genética , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration/economiaRESUMO
Eczema is a common long-term condition, but inadequate support and information can lead to poor adherence and treatment failure. We have reviewed the international literature of interventions designed to promote self-management in adults and children with eczema. MEDLINE, MEDLINE in process, Embase, CINAHL and the Global Resource for EczemA Trials database were searched from their inception to August 2016, for randomized controlled trials. Two authors independently applied eligibility criteria, assessed risk of bias for all included studies and extracted data. Twenty studies (3028 participants) conducted in 11 different countries were included. The majority (n = 18) were based in secondary care and most (n = 16) targeted children with eczema. Reporting of studies, including descriptions of the interventions and the outcomes themselves, was generally poor. Thirteen studies were face-to-face educational interventions, five were delivered online and two were studies of written action plans. Follow-up in most studies (n = 12) was short term (up to 12 weeks). Only six trials specified a single primary outcome. There was limited evidence of effectiveness. Only three studies collected and reported outcomes related to cost and just one study undertook any formal cost-effectiveness analysis. In summary, we have identified a general absence of well-conducted and well-reported randomized controlled trials with a strong theoretical basis. Therefore, there is still uncertainty about how best to support self-management of eczema in a clinically effective and cost-effective way. Recommendations on design and conduct of future trials are presented.
Assuntos
Eczema/terapia , Autogestão/métodos , Adulto , Criança , Análise Custo-Benefício , Eczema/economia , Humanos , Internet , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/economia , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/métodos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Autogestão/educação , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
To assess the patient-level and societal burden of atopic dermatitis, we comprehensively reviewed the literature related to quality of life, social, economic, academic, and occupational impacts. Atopic dermatitis has profound impacts on patient and family quality of life. A conservative estimate of the annual costs of atopic dermatitis in the United States is $5.297 billion (in 2015 USD). People with atopic dermatitis may change their occupation because of their skin disease. Research gaps include quality of life assessments outside of tertiary care centers, impacts on partners and families of adult patients, and updated comprehensive cost estimates.
Assuntos
Dermatite Atópica/economia , Eczema/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Qualidade de Vida , Adulto , Criança , Doença Crônica , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Dermatite Atópica/diagnóstico , Dermatite Atópica/epidemiologia , Dermatite Atópica/psicologia , Eczema/diagnóstico , Eczema/epidemiologia , Eczema/psicologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Perfil de Impacto da Doença , Sociedades Médicas , Estados UnidosAssuntos
Dermatite Atópica/economia , Dermatite Atópica/terapia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Auditoria Médica , Qualidade de Vida , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Criança , Doença Crônica , Dermatite Atópica/epidemiologia , Dermatite Atópica/psicologia , Eczema/diagnóstico , Eczema/economia , Eczema/psicologia , Eczema/terapia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Prevalência , Lacunas da Prática Profissional , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores Sexuais , Sociedades Científicas , Estados UnidosRESUMO
The individual burden of disease in hand eczema patients is considerable. However, little is known about the socio-economic impact of this disease. The aims of this review were to evaluate the literature on cost-of-illness in hand eczema, and to compose a checklist for future use. The literature was retrieved from the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases up to October 2015. Quality evaluation was based on seven relevant items in cost-of-illness studies. Cost data (direct and indirect) were extracted and converted into euros (2014 price level) by use of the Dutch Consumer Price Index. Six articles were included. The mean annual total cost per patient ranged from 1311 [corrected] to 9792 (direct cost per patient, 521 to 3722; [corrected] and indirect cost per patient, 100 to 6846). Occupational hand eczema patients showed indirect costs up to 70% of total costs, mainly because of absenteeism. A large diversity in hand eczema severity was found between studies. The socio-economic burden of hand eczema is considerable, especially for more severe and/or occupational hand eczema. Absenteeism from paid work leads to a high total cost-of-illness, although disregard of presenteeism often leads to underestimation of indirect costs. Differences in included cost components, the occupational status of patients and hand eczema severity make international comparison difficult. A checklist was added to standardize the approach to cost-of-illness studies in hand eczema.
Assuntos
Absenteísmo , Dermatite Ocupacional/economia , Eczema/economia , Dermatoses da Mão/economia , Presenteísmo/economia , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , HumanosRESUMO
Disability pensions due to skin diseases in Swedish male construction workers were studied by linking data from pension registers and an occupational health service. Incidence rates of disability pensions for cement workers, painters and plumbers were compared with 2 control groups. A total of 623 disability pensions were granted during 4 decades of follow-up. The main diagnoses were eczema (36%) and psoriasis (49%). Pensions were mostly granted in the age range 55-64 years. Among painters, cement workers and plumbers the incidence rates for disability pensions were 33.3, 24.5 and 20.4 cases/100,000 person-years, respectively, compared with 13.7 and 9.2 cases/100,000 person-years in control groups. Relative risks were highest for eczema, and were notable for psoriasis. Attributable fractions for eczema were 90% in cement workers and painters and 75% in plumbers compared with control groups. Attributable fractions for psoriasis in the occupational groups studied were in the range 54-67%. In conclusion, eczema and psoriasis have a high impact on loss of work ability, as reflected by disability pensions.
Assuntos
Indústria da Construção , Eczema/economia , Seguro por Deficiência , Doenças Profissionais/economia , Saúde Ocupacional , Ocupações , Pensões , Psoríase/economia , Absenteísmo , Adulto , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Avaliação da Deficiência , Eczema/diagnóstico , Eczema/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doenças Profissionais/diagnóstico , Doenças Profissionais/epidemiologia , Psoríase/diagnóstico , Psoríase/epidemiologia , Sistema de Registros , Fatores de Risco , Licença Médica/economia , Suécia/epidemiologia , Fatores de Tempo , Adulto JovemRESUMO
The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a multifaceted implementation strategy for the prevention of hand eczema in comparison with a control group among healthcare workers. A total of 48 departments (n=1,649) were randomly allocated to the implementation strategy or the control group. Data on hand eczema and costs were collected at baseline and every 3 months. Cost-effectiveness analyses were performed using linear multilevel analyses. The probability of the implementation strategy being cost-effective gradually increased with an increasing willingness-to-pay, to 0.84 at a ceiling ratio of 590,000 per person with hand eczema prevented (societal perspective). The implementation strategy appeared to be not cost-effective in comparison with the control group (societal perspective), nor was it cost-beneficial to the employer. However, this study had some methodological problems which should be taken into account when interpreting the results.
Assuntos
Eczema/economia , Eczema/prevenção & controle , Dermatoses da Mão/economia , Dermatoses da Mão/prevenção & controle , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Pessoal de Saúde/economia , Doenças Profissionais/economia , Doenças Profissionais/prevenção & controle , Saúde Ocupacional/economia , Serviços Preventivos de Saúde/economia , Adulto , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Análise Custo-Benefício , Eczema/diagnóstico , Eczema/etiologia , Feminino , Dermatoses da Mão/diagnóstico , Dermatoses da Mão/etiologia , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Pessoal de Saúde/psicologia , Humanos , Capacitação em Serviço/economia , Modelos Lineares , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos , Doenças Profissionais/diagnóstico , Doenças Profissionais/etiologia , Folhetos , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Sistemas de Alerta/economia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Eczema is common in children and in the UK most cases are managed in primary care. The foundation of all treatment is the regular use of leave-on emollients to preserve and restore moisture to the skin. This not only improves comfort but may also reduce the need for rescue treatment for 'flares', such as topical corticosteroids. However, clinicians can prescribe many different types of emollient and there is a paucity of evidence to guide this choice. One reason for this may be the challenges of conducting a clinical trial: are parents or carers of young children willing to be randomly allocated an emollient and followed up for a meaningful amount of time? DESIGN: This is a single-centre feasibility study of a pragmatic, four-arm, single-masked, randomized trial. Children with eczema who are eligible (from 1 month to less than 5 years of age, not known to be sensitive or allergic to any of study emollients or their constituents) are recruited via their general practices. Participants are allocated Aveeno® lotion, Diprobase® cream, Doublebase® gel or Hydromol® ointment via a web-based system, using a simple randomization process in a 1:1:1:1 fashion. Researchers are masked to the study emollient. Participants are assessed at baseline and followed up for 3 months. Data are collected by daily diaries, monthly researcher visits and review of electronic medical records. Because this is a feasibility study, a formal sample size calculation for the estimation of treatment effectiveness has not be made but we aim to recruit 160 participants. DISCUSSION: Recruitment is on-going. At the end of the study, as well as being able to answer the question, 'Is it is possible to recruit and retain children with eczema from primary care into a four-arm randomized trial of emollients?', we will also have collected important data on the acceptability and effectiveness of four commonly used emollients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN21828118 and Clinical Trials Register EudraCT2013-003001-26.