Improving Toddlers' Healthy Eating Habits and Self-regulation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVES: In this study, we tested whether Recipe 4 Success, a preventive intervention featuring structured food preparation lessons, was successful in improving the following 4 protective factors related to overweight and obesity among families living in poverty: toddlers' healthy eating habits, toddlers' self-regulation, parents' responsive feeding practices, and parents' sensitive scaffolding. METHODS: This randomized controlled trial was open to families enrolled in Early Head Start home visits and included 73 parents and their toddlers aged 18 to 36 months. Multimethod assessments were conducted at baseline and posttreatment. RESULTS: Compared with toddlers in usual practice Early Head Start, toddlers in Recipe 4 Success consumed healthier meals and snacks (d = 0.57; P < .03; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.08-1.06) and displayed better self-regulation (d = 0.95; P < .001; 95% CI: 0.43-1.45). Compared with parents in usual practice Early Head Start, parents in Recipe 4 Success engaged in more responsive feeding practices (d = 0.87; P < .002; 95% CI: 0.34-1.40) and were better able to sensitively scaffold their toddlers' learning and development (d = 0.58; P < .04; 95% CI: 0.07-1.09). CONCLUSIONS: This randomized controlled trial revealed medium to large intervention effects on 4 important protective factors that are related to overweight and obesity but are often compromised by living in poverty.

Parent engagement in an original and culturally adapted evidence-based parenting program, Legacy for Children™.

Legacy for Children™ (Legacy) is an evidence-based program focused on promoting sensitive, responsive parenting for socioeconomically disadvantaged families. Legacy has recently been culturally and linguistically adapted for Spanish-monolingual Latino families and is being piloted in partnership with an early childhood education program. We conducted a mixed methods study to identify barriers and facilitators to engagement, using program monitoring data sources from both participant and group leader perspectives. We conducted qualitative analyses of open-ended data to identify distinct barriers (e.g., employment challenges, health-related challenges and appointments) and facilitators (e.g., other mothers in group, interest in program topics) to engagement that emerged across English and Spanish language curriculum versions; curriculum-specific barriers and facilitators were also documented. We interpret these findings in light of quantitative data on measures of engagement, showing that participants in the Spanish curriculum evidenced comparable levels of parent-group leader relationship quality relative to the English group, and higher levels of parent's group support/connectedness and overall satisfaction. These results offer promising considerations for optimizing families' engagement in parenting programs in the context of early care and education settings.

Legado para los Niños™ (Legado) es un programa basado en la evidencia que se centra en promover una crianza sensible y susceptible para familias con desventajas socioeconómicas. Recientemente, Legado se ha adaptado cultural y lingüísticamente para familias Latinas en las que sólo se habla español, y está siendo puesto en práctica experimental en asociación con un programa de educación en la temprana niñez. Llevamos a cabo un estudio con una variedad mixta de métodos para identificar obstáculos y promotores para ser incluidos usando recursos de información de la supervisión del programa provenientes de las perspectivas tanto de participantes como de líderes de grupo. Realizamos análisis cuantitativos de información no limitada de antemano para identificar diferentes obstáculos (v.g. dificultades de empleo, dificultades y citas relacionadas con la salud) y promotores (v.g. otras madres en el grupo, interés en los temas del programa) para ser incluidos los cuales surgieron a lo largo de las versiones curriculares del inglés y del español; también se documentaron los obstáculos y promotores relacionados con el currículo específico. Interpretamos estos resultados a la luz de la información cuantitativa sobre medidas de participación, mostrando que los participantes en el currículo en español demostraron comparables niveles de calidad de la relación progenitor-líder de grupo en relación con el grupo de inglés, y más altos niveles de apoyo del grupo a los progenitores y satisfacción en general. Estos resultados ofrecen consideraciones prometedoras para lograr una óptima participación de las familias en programas de crianza en el contexto de escenarios de cuidado y educación tempranos.

Le programme Legacy for ChildrenTM (Legacy) est un programme factuel se concentrant sur la promotion d'une parentage sensible et réactif pour des familles de milieu socioéconomique défavorisé. Legacy a récemment été culturellement et linguistiquement adapté aux familles Latino américaines, en espagnol, et se trouve testé en partenariat avec un programme éducatif de la petite enfance. Nous avons procédé à une étude au moyen de méthodes mixtes afin d'identifier les barrières qui existent et freinent l'engagement, ainsi que ce qui facilite l'engagement, en utilisant des sources de données d'évaluation du programme à la fois de la perspective des participants et du leader de groupe. Nous avons fait des analyses qualitatives de données ouvertes afin d'identifier des barrières précises (i.e. les défis du chômage, les défis liés à la santé et aux rendez-vous) et les aspects facilitateurs (i.e. autres mères dans le groupe, intérêt pour les sujets du programme) pour l'engagement qui ont émergé au travers des deux versions, la version en anglais et la version en espagnol. Les barrières tenant au curriculum et aux facilitateurs ont aussi été répertoriées. Nous avons interprété ces résultats à la lumière de données quantitatives sur des mesures d'engagement, montrant que les personnes participant au curriculum espagnol faisaient preuve de niveaux comparables de qualité de la relation parent-meneur de groupe que le groupe anglais, et de niveaux plus élevés de soutien/connexion et de satisfaction générale du groupe parent. Ces résultats offrent des considérations prometteuses pour l'optimisation de l'engagement des familles dans des programmes de parentage dans le contexte du soin précoce et de l'éducation de la petite enfance.

Infant illness severity and family adjustment in the aftermath of NICU hospitalization.

Up to 15% of parents have an infant who will spend time in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). After discharge, parents may care for a medically fragile infant and worry about their development. The current study examined how infant illness severity is associated with family adjustment. Participants included parents with infants who had been discharged from the NICU 6 months to 3 years prior to study participation (N = 199). Via a Qualtrics online survey, parents reported their infants' medical history, parenting stress, family burden, couple functioning, and access to resources. Multivariable regression analyses revealed that more severe infant medical issues during hospitalization (e.g., longer length of stay and more medical devices) were associated with greater family burden, but not stress or couple functioning. Infant health issues following hospitalization (i.e., medical diagnosis and more medical specialists) were associated with greater stress, poorer couple functioning, and greater family burden. Less time for parents was associated with increased stress and poorer couple functioning. Surprisingly, parents of infants who were rehospitalized reported less stress and better couple functioning, but greater family burden. Family-focused interventions that incorporate psychoeducation about provider-patient communication, partner support, and self-care may be effective to prevent negative psychosocial sequelae among families.

Hasta un 15% de progenitores tiene un infante que pasará un tiempo en una Unidad de Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal (NICU). Después de la salida, los progenitores deben cuidar de un infante médicamente débil y preocuparse por su desarrollo. El presente estudio examinó cómo la severidad de la enfermedad del infante se asocia con la adaptabilidad familiar. Los participantes eran progenitores con infantes que habían salido de la Unidad de Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal entre 6 meses y 3 años antes de participar en el estudio (N = 199). Por medio de una encuesta electrónica tipo Qualtrics, los progenitores reportaron el historial médico de su infante, el estrés de la crianza, la carga familiar, el funcionamiento como pareja y el acceso a recursos. Los análisis de regresión de variables múltiples revelaron que asuntos médicos más severos del infante durante la hospitalización (v.g. período más largo de hospitalización, más aparatos médicos) se asociaban con mayor carga familiar, aunque no así con estrés o el funcionamiento como pareja. Los asuntos de salud infantil posteriores a la hospitalización (v.g. diagnóstico médico, más médicos especialistas) se asociaron con mayor estrés, un más pobre funcionamiento como pareja y mayor carga familiar. Menos tiempo para los progenitores se asoció con un aumento en el estrés y un más pobre funcionamiento como pareja. De modo sorprendente, los progenitores de infantes que habían sido hospitalizados otra vez reportaron menos estrés y mejor funcionamiento como pareja, pero mayor carga familiar. Las intervenciones con enfoque familiar que incorporan educación sicológica acerca de la comunicación entre proveedor y paciente, apoyo a la propia pareja y el cuidado propio pudieran ser eficaces para prevenir la secuela sicosocial entre familias.

Jusqu'à 15% des parents ont un bébé qui passera du temps en Unité Néonatale de Soins Intensifs. A la sortie de l'hôpital les parents peuvent se retrouver à prendre soin d'un bébé fragile du point de vue médical et s'inquiéter de son développement. Cette étude a examiné comment la sévérité de la maladie du bébé est liée à l'ajustement de la famille. Les participants ont inclu des parents avec des bébés étant sortis de l'Unité Néonatale de Soins Intensifs 6 mois à trois ans avant la participation à l'étude (N = 199). Au travers d'un questionnaire Qualtrics en ligne, les parents ont fait état de l'histoire médicale des bébés, du stress de parentage, du poids sur la famille, du fonctionnement du couple et de l'accès aux ressources. Des analyses de régression multivariables ont révélé que les problèmes médicaux du bébé durant l'hospitalisation les plus graves (i.e. durée plus longue du séjour, plus de dispositifs médicaux) étaient liés à un poids sur la famille plus fort, mais pas au stress ni n'affectait le fonctionnement du couple. Les problèmes de santé du bébé après l'hospitalisation (soit un diagnostic médical, plus de spécialistes médicaux) étaient liés à un stress plus élevé, à un fonctionnement du couple moins bon, et à un poids sur la famille plus fort. Moins de temps pour les parents était lié à un stress supplémentaire et à un fonctionnement du couple moins bon. Avec surprise, les parents de bébés qui étaient réhospitalisés ont fait état de moins de stress et d'un meilleur fonctionnement de couple, mais d'un poids plus fort sur la famille. Les interventions centrées sur la famille qui incorporent une psychoéducation sur la communication médecin-parent, le soutien du partenaire et le soin de soi peut s'avérer efficace afin d'éviter des séquelles psychosociales négatives chez les familles.

Addressing Immigration-Related Stress in a Culturally Adapted Parenting Intervention for Mexican-Origin Immigrants: Initial Positive Effects and Key Areas of Improvement.

Culturally adapted evidence-based parenting interventions constitute a key strategy to reduce widespread mental health disparities experienced by Latinx populations throughout the United States. Most recently, the relevance of culturally adapted parenting interventions has become more prominent as vulnerable Latinx populations are exposed to considerable contextual stressors resulting from an increasingly anti-immigration climate in the country. The current study was embedded within a larger NIMH-funded investigation, aimed at contrasting the differential impact of two culturally adapted versions of the evidence-based parenting intervention known as GenerationPMTO©. Specifically, a sample of low-income Mexican-origin immigrants was exposed either to a culturally adapted version of GenerationPMTO primarily focused on parent training components, or to an enhanced culturally adapted version in which parenting components were complemented by sessions focused on immigration-related challenges. The sample for the study consisted of 103 Mexican-origin immigrant families (190 individual parents). Descriptive analysis and generalized estimating equations (GEEs) indicated that exposure to the enhanced intervention, which included context- and culture-specific sessions, resulted in specific benefits for parents. However, the magnitude of the impact was not uniform for mothers and fathers and differed according to the type of immigration-related stress being examined (i.e., intrafamilial vs. extrafamilial stress). Overall, findings indicate the relevance of overtly addressing contextual (e.g., discrimination) and cultural challenges in culturally adapted interventions, as well as the need to increase precision according to the extent to which immigration-related stressors impact immigrant mothers and fathers in common and contrasting ways. Implications for family therapy practice and research are discussed.

Las intervenciones basadas en evidencia, dirigidas a padres y adaptadas a la cultura son una estrategia clave para reducir las desigualdades en salud mental generalizadas que las poblaciones de latin@s experimentan en los Estados Unidos. Más recientemente, la relevancia de intervenciones dirigidas a padres adaptadas a la cultura ha adquirido más peso al estar las poblaciones de latin@s expuestas a factores estresantes contextuales considerables como resultado de un ambiente cada vez más contrario a la inmigración en el país. Este estudio fue incluido dentro de una investigación de mayor escala financiada por NIMH cuyo objetivo era contrastar el impacto diferencial de dos versiones adaptadas a la cultura de la intervención basada en evidencia y dirigida a padres conocida como GenerationPMTO© . En específico, se expuso una muestra de inmigrantes de origen mexicano de bajo ingreso, o a una versión de GenerationPMTO adaptada a la cultura y enfocada principalmente en elementos de entrenamiento de padres, o a una versión reforzada adaptada a la cultura en la cual los elementos de padres se complementaron con sesiones enfocadas en retos asociados a la inmigración. La muestra para el estudio consistió de 103 familias inmigrantes de origen mexicano (190 padres individuales). Análisis descriptivos y ecuaciones de estimación generalizadas indicaron que la exposición una intervención reforzada, que incluía sesiones contextual y culturalmente específicas, generaron beneficios específicos para los padres. Sin embargo, la magnitud del impacto no fue uniforme para madres y padres y fue distinta según el tipo de estrés por inmigración examinado (p.ej., estrés intrafamiliar versus estrés extrafamiliar). En general, los hallazgos indican la relevancia de enfrentar abiertamente retos contextuales (p.ej., discriminación) y culturales en intervenciones adaptadas a la cultura, así como la necesidad de aumentar la precisión conforme a cómo los factores estresantes asociados a la inmigración afectan a madres y padres inmigrantes de la misma y diferentes maneras. Se discuten las implicaciones para la práctica e investigación de terapia familiar.

Behavioral-educational sleep interventions for pediatric epilepsy: a randomized controlled trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of a clinic-based, behavioral-educational sleep intervention on sleep of children with epilepsy, maternal knowledge about childhood sleep, and maternal sleep quality. METHODS: A total of 100 toddlers and preschool-age children with epilepsy (1.5-6 years, 55% boys) and their parents were randomized to receive sleep intervention (n = 50) or usual care with attention (n = 50). Outcomes were assessed at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months after intervention with the use of objective actigraphy, Children's Sleep Habits Questionnaire, Parents' Sleep Knowledge Inventory, and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. Intervention effects were examined using general linear models for repeated measurements to compare the mean change in outcomes from baseline to 12 months post-intervention between the two groups. RESULTS: Sleep intervention resulted in children having greater sleep efficiency by 2.03% compared with the usual care group (95% CI = 0.20% to 3.86%; p = .03). Children in the intervention group also had significantly longer total nighttime sleep as objectively assessed by actigraphy than did those in the usual care group, with an adjusted mean difference of 16.13 minutes (95% CI = 0.24% to 32.03%; p = .04). No intervention effects were observed for maternal knowledge about childhood sleep, and maternal sleep quality. CONCLUSION: Sleep intervention provided during routine neurologic visits results in significant, measurable, and sustained benefits in sleep quality and quantity in children with epilepsy. Future trials are warranted to evaluate whether improvements in sleep could impact health-related quality of life or other aspects of functioning in children with epilepsy. CLINICAL TRIAL: This trial has been registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (trial name: Sleep Intervention for Pediatric Epilepsy; registration number: NCT02514291).

The Pillow Project, Infant Choking, and Basic Life Support Training for Prospective Parents: A Low-Cost Intervention for Widespread Application.

Dissemination of pediatric basic life support skills, while recommended, is not done routinely for pregnant women and their partners within the maternity services. This study evaluates an e-learning program coupled with the use of a novel infant pillow mannequin to determine whether a low-cost intervention with potential for widespread application could enable training in the event of an infant choking and the provision of basic life support. A prospective cohort study with an uncontrolled pre- and posttest design was used following institutional ethical approval. A 4-week cycle of antenatal education classes in a regional Maternity Hospital in Ireland and a purposive sample of pregnant women and their partners attending the antenatal education classes were used. The following measures were assessed: (1) confidence in knowing what to do in the event of an infant choking; (2) confidence in performing infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR); (3) ability to perform the requisite skills; and (4) the perceived acceptability of the infant pillow mannequin as a means of practice. Twenty-four individuals completed a pre- and postprogram questionnaire. The e-learning program along with practice on the pillow mannequin significantly affected confidence (P < .001) in the actions to take in the event of an infant choking and in performing infant CPR. Forty-four participants used the pillow mannequin for practice and volunteered to have their skills assessed. More than 90% demonstrated correct positioning of the infant in the event of choking, correctly identified the correct ratio of chest compressions to breaths, and conducted chest compressions to the required depth. Three distinct categories of comment were identified: usefulness of the program; simplicity of the program/pillow mannequin; and accessibility for practice at home. A self-instructional e-learning program coupled with an infant pillow mannequin enables parents to learn the procedure in the event of an infant choking and to demonstrate basic life support. This low-cost intervention has the potential for widespread application within developed and developing countries.

Parent-directed intervention in promoting knowledge of pediatric nutrition and healthy lifestyle among low-SES families with toddlers: A randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to determine the efficacy of an interactive, home visiting curriculum tailored to low socio-economic status families in improving parental knowledge of paediatric nutrition and healthy lifestyle. METHODS: Parents of toddlers aged 13-16 months living with a household income below 200% of the federal poverty line were randomized into healthy lifestyle intervention and control home visiting curriculum groups. Each curriculum consisted of 12 one-on-one educational sessions with parents facilitated by a trained home-visitor that were administered over a 6-month intervention period. Knowledge assessments were administered before and after the intervention period. RESULTS: Results of a one-way analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) analysis showed that parents in the intervention group (M = 26.05, SD = 4.24) scored significantly higher than control parents (M = 23.84, SD = 4.26) post-intervention, controlling for parent education level, F(1, 102) = 7.494 (95% confidence interval [-3.68, -0.59]). One-way ANCOVA analysis showed no significant mean difference between the parents in the intervention group (M = 24.13, SD = 4.37) and the control group (M = 23.93, SD = 4.16) at baseline, controlling for parent education level, F(1, 163) = 0.002 (95% confidence interval [-1.28, 1.22]). CONCLUSIONS: An interactive healthy lifestyle intervention focused on low-SES families significantly improved parental knowledge of paediatric healthy lifestyle. Changes in parental knowledge is a key preliminary step in behaviour change to ultimately affect behaviour. Informing and encouraging parents of toddlers to guide healthy lifestyle development early remains a promising point of intervention for prevention, rather than remediation, of childhood obesity.

Equity effects of parenting interventions for child conduct problems: a pan-European individual participant data meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Childhood conduct problems are a costly public health problem and are five times more common in socially disadvantaged groups than they are in advantaged groups. Untreated, conduct problems have a poor prognosis, with increasing gaps between socioeconomic groups, and high rates of subsequent criminality. Incredible Years is a high quality parenting programme for reducing conduct problems and is widely disseminated in Europe. Many trials have shown Incredible Years to be effective but the potential effects of parenting interventions on social inequality are unknown. Some behavioural interventions (eg, smoking cessation programmes), although beneficial overall, can widen inequality gaps. Because single trials and aggregate-level meta-analyses are ill equipped for examining differential intervention (moderator) effects, we pooled individual-level trial data to assess the effects of Incredible Years on social equity. METHODS: We did a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis by searching CINAHL, Embase, Global Health, Medline, and PsycINFO, for studies published from inception to March 15, 2019. We also searched the Incredible Years website library and consulted with experts, including the European Incredible Years mentors' network. We included data from all completed randomised trials of the Incredible Years parenting intervention in Europe that included children aged 1-12 years, including unpublished trials, without restriction on publication year or outcome measures. We included prevention (selective or universal) and treatment or indicated prevention trials (for children diagnosed or above the clinical cutoff for conduct problems). We excluded trials or conditions within trials that were not randomised, included additional non-parenting material (eg, child-focused interventions), or were abbreviated, non-standard versions of the usual Incredible Years intervention of 12-14 weekly sessions. We requested individual participant data from the study authors. The primary outcome was child conduct problems, assessed using the Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory Intensity (ECBI-I) scale. Moderators were analysed using multilevel modelling with multiple imputation. FINDINGS: Of 15 European trials of Incredible Years parenting programmes (n=1696 children), individual participant data were unavailable for one trial and one trial did not assess the primary outcome. Children were aged 2-10 years (median 5·1), 492 (30%) of 1651 children were from an ethnic minority and 931 (58%) of 1614 were from low-income families. Families who received the Incredible Years intervention reported an overall reduction in child conduct problems (13·5 points on the ECBI-I scale, 95% CI 10·9-16·1). There were no differential effects by family disadvantage (indicated by poverty, lone parenthood, teenage parenthood, household joblessness, or low education), or ethnic minority status. INTERPRETATION: We found no evidence for differential effects by social disadvantage, suggesting that Incredible Years is unlikely to widen socioeconomic inequalities in conduct problems. Furthermore, the programme might be an important tool for reducing social disparities and improving poor long-term outcomes in disadvantaged families because follow-up studies indicate that benefits persist. Clinicians and commissioners can be reassured that the programme is similarly effective for families from different backgrounds. FUNDING: UK National Institute for Health Research.

Improving the cost-effectiveness of laypersons' paediatric basic life support skills training: A randomised non-inferiority study.

AIM: To compare dyad (training in pairs without an instructor) with resource-intensive instructor-led training for laypersons' paediatric resuscitation skills in a non-inferiority trial and examine cost-effectiveness of the training methods. METHODS: In this randomised parallel group non-inferiority trial, 155 dyad and 175 instructor-led laypersons were trained in Basic Life Support and Foreign Body Airway Obstruction Management. Dyads were given instructional videos, hands-on exercises and provided feedback to their partner for 50 min. Instructor-led laypersons trained in groups of six for two hours. Learning were assessed in scenarios immediately after training and, subsequently, at 14 days, 1, and 3 months. Pass rates, cost-effectiveness of producing a competent layperson (passing both tests), and non-inferiority were analysed. RESULTS: Sixty-eight (45.6%) dyad and 130 (74.3%) instructor-led laypersons passed the basic life support test (p < 0.001). For Foreign Body Airway Obstruction Management 77 (54.2%) dyad and 130 (79.3%) for instructor-led laypersons passed (p < 0.001). Skills decreased over three months for both groups. Forty-two (30.4%) dyad and ninety-eight (59.8%) for instructor-led laypersons were competent after training (p < 0.001). The lower effectiveness of dyad training had reduced costs (p < 0.001). For each 10,000 USD allocated to training, dyad training would result in 71 vs. 65 competent laypersons for instructor-led training. Non-inferiority of dyad training could not be established. CONCLUSION: Instructor-led training was the most effective but also the most expensive training method, making it less cost-effective than dyad training. When the aim is to train for quantity rather than quality, dyad training would be the preferred choice of training method.

Healing through Parenting: An Intervention Delivery and Process of Change Model Developed with Low-Income Latina/o Immigrant Families.

Low-income Latinas/os are exposed to widespread mental health disparities in the United States. Most recently, a resurgence of anti-immigration narratives has led vulnerable Latina/o immigrants to experience considerable contextual stressors with multiple deleterious consequences for their overall well-being, including significant disruptions to their parenting practices. Within this context of adversity and despite the multiple benefits associated with parent training (PT) prevention interventions, the availability of contextually and culturally relevant PT interventions remains limited in underserved Latina/o communities. This paper constitutes a contribution to this gap in knowledge by presenting a model of intervention delivery utilized in the dissemination of culturally adapted versions of the evidence-based intervention known as GenerationPMTO.© The proposed model also describes a process of change that we have documented in empirical research with low-income Latina/o immigrant parents who have been exposed to the adapted interventions. The manuscript is organized in four sections. First, an overview of the model is discussed, along with a brief summary of major theories. Next, the core components of the model are described, complemented by the presentation of a case study. Finally, implications for prevention and clinical intervention are discussed.

Los latinos de bajos recursos están expuestos a amplias desigualdades relacionadas con la salud mental en los Estados Unidos. Recientemente, un resurgimiento de relatos antiinmigratorios han llevado a los inmigrantes latinos vulnerables a sufrir considerables factores desencadenantes de estrés contextual con varias consecuencias perjudiciales para su bienestar general, por ejemplo, interrupciones significativas a sus prácticas de crianza. Dentro de este contexto de adversidad, y a pesar de los múltiples beneficios asociados con las intervenciones preventivas de capacitación para padres, la disponibilidad de intervenciones de capacitación para padres contextualmente y culturalmente relevantes siguen siendo limitadas en las comunidades latinas marginadas. Este artículo constituye un aporte a este déficit de conocimiento mediante la presentación de un modelo de aplicación de intervenciones utilizado en la difusión de versiones culturalmente adaptadas de la intervención de base factual, conocida como GenerationPMTO.© El modelo propuesto también describe un proceso de cambio que hemos documentado en la investigación empírica con padres inmigrantes latinos de bajos recursos que han estado expuestos a las intervenciones adaptadas. El manuscrito está organizado en cuatro secciones. Primero, se debate una presentación general del modelo junto con un breve resumen de teorías principales. Luego, se describen los componentes principales del modelo, complementados por la presentación de un caso práctico. Finalmente, se debaten las consecuencias para la prevención y la intervención clínica.

CARer-ADministration of as-needed subcutaneous medication for breakthrough symptoms in homebased dying patients (CARiAD): study protocol for a UK-based open randomised pilot trial.

BACKGROUND: While the majority of seriously ill people wish to die at home, only half achieve this. The likelihood of someone dying at home often depends on the availability of able and willing lay carers to support them. Dying people are usually unable to take oral medication. When top-up symptom relief medication is required, a clinician travels to the home to administer injectable medication, with attendant delays. The administration of subcutaneous injections by lay carers, though not widespread practice in the UK, has proven key in achieving home deaths in other countries. Our aim is to determine if carer-administration of as-needed subcutaneous medication for four frequent breakthrough symptoms (pain, nausea, restlessness and noisy breathing) in home-based dying patients is feasible and acceptable in the UK. METHODS: This paper describes a randomised pilot trial across three UK sites, with an embedded qualitative study. Dyads of adult patients/carers are eligible, where patients are in the last weeks of life and wish to die at home, and lay carers who are willing to be trained to give subcutaneous medication. Dyads who do not meet strict risk assessment criteria (including known history of substance abuse or carer ability to be trained to competency) will not be approached. Carers in the intervention arm will receive a manualised training package delivered by their local nursing team. Dyads in the control arm will receive usual care. The main outcomes of interest are feasibility, acceptability, recruitment rates, attrition and selection of the most appropriate outcome measures. Interviews with carers and healthcare professionals will explore attitudes to, experiences of and preferences for giving subcutaneous medication and experience of trial processes. The study has obtained full ethical approval. DISCUSSION: This study will rehearse the procedures and logistics which will be undertaken in a future definitive randomised controlled trial and will inform the design of such a study. Findings will illuminate methodological and ethical issues pertaining to researching last days of life care. The study is funded by the National Institute for Health Research (Health Technology Assessment [HTA] project 15/10/37). TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN, ISRCTN 11211024 . Registered on 27 September 2016.

More than depression: a multi-dimensional assessment of postpartum distress symptoms before and after a residential early parenting program.

INTRODUCTION: Parents are vulnerable to psychological distress symptoms in the postpartum period. It is routine to screen for depressive symptoms, but anxiety, stress, fatigue, irritability and insomnia symptoms are less often assessed despite their prevalence. This study aimed to assess multiple dimensions of psychological distress, and their reliable change and clinically significant change among women admitted to a residential program for assistance with unsettled infant behaviors (UIB). METHOD: Women admitted to a five-night residential early parenting program completed self-report measures: the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale, Irritability Depression Anxiety Scale, Fatigue Severity Scale, and Insomnia Severity Index. A sub-group completed a computerized emotional Go-NoGo (EGNG) task as a measure of emotional impulsivity. RESULTS: Seventy-eight women were recruited (Mage = 34.46, SDage = 4.16). On admission, 48% of women reported clinically elevated depressive symptoms and 97.5% of women not reporting elevated depressive symptoms reported clinical elevations in at least one other form of distress. Upon discharge, all self-report distress symptoms were significantly reduced (all p-values <.001), but reliable and clinically significant change only occurred in a subgroup of women. There were no significant changes in indicators of impulsivity based on the EGNG. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to, and often in the absence of, depressive symptoms, women attending an early parenting program experienced a wide range of psychological distress, including fatigue, insomnia, anxiety and stress. Different forms of distress improved in different magnitudes to the treatment provided. These findings highlight the need for a multi-dimensional approach in the assessment and treatment of postpartum distress.

Job- and schoolprescription: A local adaptation to individual placement and support for first episode psychosis.

AIM: Individual placement and support (IPS) for first episode psychosis (FEP) has proven effective for employment and education, but yields differing results across geographical regions. Local adaptations may be necessary for various reasons, such as regional differences in employment- and welfare services; in educational opportunities and job markets. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of an adapted Norwegian intervention offering early IPS for education and employment to persons with FEP. METHOD: Matched control (N = 66) study with a 1-year early IPS intervention and a 2-year follow up. A rating of fidelity to the IPS model was conducted. RESULTS: Fidelity was "good." Adaptations to the model included the use of internships and flexible combinations of education and employment. Thirty out of 33 participants completed the intervention. Fourteen were in competitive employment >20 h/wk post intervention, compared to 2 in the control group. Fifteen participants were enrolled in education >20 h/wk, 10 of whom also had employment >20 h/wk and 3 < 20 h/wk, compared to 5 in the control group, with 2 having employment <20 h/wk on the side. Symptom levels did not predict outcome. CONCLUSION: The School- and JobPrescription adaptation of IPS, allowing for temporary internships as a step towards obtaining the goal of paid competitive employment and facilitating flexible combinations of employment and education, showed encouraging results. These were however not sustained after closure of the intervention. At the 2-year follow up, Job- and SchoolPrescription advantages had waned, underscoring the point in IPS that support should be time-unlimited.

THE INITIAL ASSESSMENT OF A COMMUNITY-BASED INTERVENTION WITH MEXICAN-HERITAGE PARENTS IN BOOSTING THE EFFECTS OF A SUBSTANCE USE PREVENTION INTERVENTION WITH YOUTH.

Drawing from an ecodevelopmental framework, this article examines if adding a parenting component, Families Preparing the New Generation (Familias Preparando la Nueva Generación), to an efficacious classroom-based drug abuse prevention intervention, keepin'it REAL, will boost the effects of the youth intervention in preventing substance use for middle school Mexican-heritage students. Youth attending schools in a large urban area in the Southwestern U.S. (N = 462) were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 conditions: parent and youth, youth only, or control. Using ordinary least squares regression, changes in youth substance use outcomes were examined. Results indicate that youth whose parents also participated in prevention programming exhibited significantly lower use of alcohol, cigarettes, marijuana, and inhalants compared to youth who received only keepin'it REAL. These initial effects indicate that involving parents in prevention efforts can strengthen the overall efficacy of a youth prevention intervention. This article discusses specific implications for the design of prevention interventions, policy, and future research.

Assessment of Maternal Knowledge and Confidence About Abusive Head Trauma and Coping With Infant Crying Before and After Infant Safety Education in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.

Infants with a history of perinatal illness are at higher risk for abusive head trauma (AHT). Crying is a common trigger for physical abuse, and education on coping with infant crying is an important component of AHT prevention. This study assesses the effects of education in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) on mothers' knowledge about AHT and infant crying, self-efficacy in applying the education to infant cares and providing the education to others, and the quality of AHT and infant crying education after discharge. Mothers received a standardized education program about AHT and infant crying and completed a preeducation survey, posteducation survey, and 4- to 5-month follow-up survey. Overall, there was a sustained increase in knowledge (P < .001) and confidence (P < .001). Mothers who received verbal education reported a higher increase in confidence (P = .03). Few received information from healthcare providers about crying (35%) and AHT (20%) after discharge. At follow-up survey, most felt highly confident in their ability to share information about AHT (97%) and calm their infant (95%). Most had shared the education with others (77%). Education on AHT and crying in the NICU can produce sustained increases in mothers' knowledge and confidence, but the effectiveness may be improved by addressing unique barriers to education in this population.

Enhancing maternal and infant wellbeing: study protocol for a feasibility trial of the Baby Triple P Positive Parenting programme for mothers with severe mental health difficulties (the IMAGINE study).

BACKGROUND: There is a strong evidence base for the benefits of parenting interventions for parents without severe mental illness (SMI). As the impact of maternal SMI can be significant on child development, mothers need support to maximise outcomes for themselves and their children. Some mothers with SMI require admission jointly with their baby to a Mother and Baby Unit (MBU), a psychiatric inpatient ward, for assessment and treatment. However, MBUs do not yet offer formally evaluated, evidence-based parenting interventions as a matter of routine. This paper describes a study to investigate the feasibility and acceptability of conducting a randomised controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate a parenting and psychological intervention targeting the mother's and infant's wellbeing for mothers admitted to a MBU. METHODS/DESIGN: This study is a multisite, single-blind feasibility trial with half the participants randomised to the Baby Triple P Positive Parenting Programme plus treatment as usual (TAU) and the other half randomised to TAU alone. Self-report and observer-rated assessments are collected at baseline, 10 weeks post-baseline and 6 months post-baseline. Participants are mothers admitted to a MBU in the Northwest of England or the Midlands. Participants are included if they are fluent in English to provide informed, written consent. Our objective is to determine whether we can recruit 66 women, randomise 60, and retain them in the intervention and study, and whether the intervention and study procedures are acceptable. As part of a nested process evaluation, qualitative interview data from trial participants and MBU staff will inform feasibility and acceptability. The feasibility of collecting data required to conduct an economic evaluation of the intervention will also be explored. DISCUSSION: Although research has been conducted in relation to mothers with severe mental illness and MBUs, to our knowledge, this is the first controlled trial to test the feasibility, acceptability, uptake and retention alongside the potential efficacy of a parenting intervention for this population. This study is essential to examine the contextual challenges involved in this setting with this population and to identify any refinements required. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN12765736 . Date of first registration: 2 February 2017.

A tripartite model for recruiting African-Americans into fatherhood intervention research.

Many studies have examined factors influencing African-American (AA) participation in research studies. But none inform the recruitment of AA men into fatherhood intervention research. Our purpose is to describe the recruitment and enrollment framework of the Dedicated African American Dad (DAAD) Study, a randomized controlled trial (RCT) designed to test a fatherhood intervention against a financial literacy comparison condition. AA nonresident (AANR) fathers are fathers who do not reside with their child on a full-time basis. Fathers attended 10 group-based sessions; and father and mother informants completed research interviews at baseline, postintervention, and 12 weeks postintervention. The DAAD Study tripartite model is a system of strategies that address three factors that individually and cooperatively affect recruitment of AANR fathers into research: community partnerships; study infrastructure; and recruitment personnel. The intersection of these three components forms a recruitment nexus that can be used to guide community-based research. The DAAD study serves as an exemplar of recruitment challenges, strategies, and lessons learned.

Distance-Delivered Parent Training for Childhood Disruptive Behavior (Strongest Families™): a Randomized Controlled Trial and Economic Analysis.

Disruptive behavior disorders are prevalent in youth, yet most children with disruptive behavior do not have access to timely, effective treatment. Distance-delivered service (e.g., via telephone, Internet) can overcome several barriers to care. This study tested the effectiveness of a 12-week parent training program, Strongest Families™ Parenting the Active Child, delivered via written material, skill-based videos, and telephone coaching sessions, as compared to usual care in reducing child externalizing behavior. Participants were 172 primary caregivers of a 6- to 12-year-old (29% girls; M age = 8.5 years) recruited from community children's mental health clinics. Participants were randomized to either Strongest Families™ or usual care and completed measures of child externalizing behavior, parenting practices, parent distress, and intervention services consumed at baseline and 5-, 10-, 16-, and 22-months post-baseline. Growth curve analysis showed significant reductions in externalizing behavior in both conditions over time. Improvements were significantly greater at 10 months in the Strongest Families™ condition (d = 0.43). At 22 months, however, the differences were not significant and small in magnitude (d = -0.05). The intervention decreased inconsistent discipline significantly more than usual care. Parents in both conditions showed significant reductions in distress. We also conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis to assess the value for money of the Strongest Families™ program versus usual care. Distance parent training is a promising way to increase access to, and reduce costs associated with, mental health care for families with a child with disruptive behavior.

Adapting a parenting intervention for parents aging out of the child welfare system: A systematic approach to expand the reach of an evidence-based intervention.

Parents aging out of the child welfare system face a constellation of unique risk factors that threaten the well-being of themselves and their children. Although parenting interventions are an important resource for providing much-needed services to parents aging out, there is currently a lack of evidence-based parenting interventions that address the unique needs of this population. The purpose of this project was to systematically adapt an evidence-based parenting intervention for parents aging out. An established adaptation framework was used to guide this process, and acceptability and feasibility outcomes were evaluated as part of a pilot study of the adapted intervention. Preliminary intervention adaptations included modifications to program delivery and program content. Study findings indicated a high level of parent satisfaction with the adapted intervention but challenges to feasibility because of inconsistent attendance and the substantial effort required for intervention delivery. This study constitutes a critical first step toward increasing the reach of evidence-based parenting interventions among parents aging out of the child welfare system and underscores the need for continued efforts to develop sustainable and effective parenting services for this at-risk population. (PsycINFO Database Record

Reading Aloud and Child Development: A Cluster-Randomized Trial in Brazil.

OBJECTIVES: Many children in low- and middle-income countries fail to reach their developmental potential. We sought to determine if a parenting program focused on the promotion of reading aloud enhanced parent-child interactions and child development among low-income families in northern Brazil. METHODS: This was a cluster-randomized study of educational child care centers randomly assigned to receive an additional parenting program (intervention) or standard child care without a parenting component (control). Parent-child dyads were enrolled at the beginning of the school year and were assessed at enrollment and at the end of the school year. Families in intervention centers could borrow children's books on a weekly basis and could participate in monthly parent workshops focused on reading aloud. We compared parents and children in intervention and control centers 9 months after the start of the intervention on measures of parent-child interaction and child language, cognitive, and social-emotional development. RESULTS: Five hundred and sixty-six parent-child dyads (279 intervention; 287 control) in 12 child care clusters (26-76 children per cluster) were assessed at enrollment; 464 (86%) contributed follow-up data. Parents in the intervention group engaged in significantly greater cognitive stimulation (Cohen's d = 0.43) and higher quantity and quality of reading interactions (d = 0.52-0.57) than controls; children in the intervention scored significantly higher than controls on receptive vocabulary (d = 0.33), working memory (d = 0.46), and IQ (d = 0.33). CONCLUSIONS: An innovative program focused on the promotion of parent-child reading aloud resulted in benefits to parent-child interactions and to child language and cognitive development that were greater than those provided by educational child care alone. This promising approach merits further evaluation at scale.