Effect of a Japanese Version of the Burns Wean Assessment Program e-Learning Materials on Ventilator Withdrawal for Intensive Care Unit Nurses.

BACKGROUND: No assessment tool for predicting ventilator withdrawal success is currently available in Japan. Thus, an accessible and valid assessment tool to address this issue is needed. The Burns Wean Assessment Program (BWAP) has been validated as a reliable predictor of ventilator withdrawal outcomes. However, nurses must be familiar with this tool to ensure its efficient utilization in clinical settings. PURPOSE: This study was designed to examine the effect of a 26-item Japanese version of BWAP (J-BWAP) e-learning materials on ventilator withdrawal in a sample of intensive care unit nurses in Japan. METHODS: The BWAP was translated into Japanese, checked, and verified as the J-BWAP. Nonrandomized intensive care unit nurses from six hospitals were assigned to three groups, including Intervention Group 1 (e-learning in one session), Intervention Group 2 (e-learning over three sessions during 1 week), and the control group. The participants underwent pretests and posttests using web-based, simulated patients. The primary outcome measure was the difference in online pretest and posttest total scores among the two intervention groups and the control group. The feasibility of the J-BWAP and its e-learning materials was evaluated using four frameworks: acceptability, demand, implementation, and adaptation. RESULTS: Of the 48 participants in the study, 32 completed the posttest and were included in the analysis (dropout rate: 33.3%). The difference between pretest and posttest scores was significantly higher in the intervention groups than the control group (2 vs. -1, p = .0191) and in Intervention Group 2 than the control group (2.0 vs. -0.5, p = .049). The feasibility frameworks for the J-BWAP and its e-learning materials were mostly positive. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The development of the J-BWAP and training nurses using e-learning were shown to be feasible in this study. The J-BWAP contents are appropriate for predicting the outcome of mechanical ventilation withdrawal. The J-BWAP has the potential to become a common tool among Japanese medical professionals after the contents are further simplified for daily application in clinical practice. Subsequent studies should verify the reliability and validity of this tool and test the real-world utility of the J-BWAP using randomized controlled trials in Japanese clinical settings.

Nursing workload assessment in an intensive care unit: A retrospective observational study using the Nursing Activities Score.

BACKGROUND: Nursing Activities Score (NAS) is a promising tool for calculating the nursing workload in intensive care units (ICU). However, data on intensive care nursing activities in Portugal are practically non-existent. AIM: To assess the nursing workload in a Portuguese ICU using the NAS. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study developed throughout the analysis of the electronic health record database from 56 adult patients admitted to a six-bed Portuguese ICU between 1 June-31 August 2020. The nursing workload was assessed by the Portuguese version of the NAS. The study was approved by the Hospital Council Board and Ethics Committee. The study report followed the STROBE guidelines. RESULTS: The average occupancy rate was 73.55% (±16.60%). The average nursing workload per participant was 67.52 (±10.91) points. There was a correlation between the occupancy rate and the nursing workload. In 35.78% of the days, the nursing workload was higher than the available human resources, overloading nurse staffing/team. CONCLUSIONS: The nursing workload reported follows the trend of the international studies and the results reinforce the importance of adjusting the nursing staffing to the complexity of nursing care in this ICU. This study highlighted periods of nursing workload that could compromise patient safety. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: This was one of the first studies carried out with the NAS after its cross-cultural adaptation and validation for the Portuguese population. The nursing workload at the patient level was higher in the first 24 h of ICU stays. Because of the 'administrative and management activities' related to the 'patient discharge procedures', the last 24 h of ICU stays also presented high levels of nursing workload. The implementation of a nurse-to-patient ratio of 1:1 may contribute to safer nurse staffing and to improve patient safety in this Tertiary (level 3) ICU.

Development and validation of a daily assessment tool for critically ill patients.

BACKGROUND: Patients in intensive care units require comprehensive care. Hence, improving health care quality depends on accurate assessment and documentation. AIM: To develop and validate the content of an assessment sheet for critically ill patients. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A Delphi design study was conducted between January and March 2020. The content validity index (CVI) was used to calculate the degree of agreement among the experts to analyse the instrument and the entire set of items. Content validity was determined by seven experts (three critical care nursing professionals, two critical care doctors, and two anaesthesiologists) using a four-point Likert scale. They evaluated the items in terms of the following: 1 = "irrelevant," 2 = "somewhat relevant if the phrasing is profoundly adjusted," 3 = "relevant with some adjustment as to phrasing," and 4 = "very relevant." The CVI was applied, and the accepted value was ≥0.50. RESULTS: Three rounds of evaluation were required to achieve the minimum index. The items were reviewed for content and face validity. The instrument was validated with 86 items with a total CVI of 0.90, a face validity of 1, and a scale-level content validity index/universal agreement calculation method (S-CVI/UA) value of 0.813. CONCLUSION: This instrument can help nurses, doctors, academics, and students assess patients in intensive care units. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The daily assessment tool may provide a systematic and consistent approach to critically ill patients' assessment to guide interventions.

Advocacia do paciente na valorização do ser social e da família em tempos de COVID-19 / Defensa del paciente en la valoración del ser social y la familia en tiempos de COVID-19 / Patient advocacy in valuing social and family being in times of COVID-19

Resumo Objetivo compreender as estratégias utilizadas pelos enfermeiros intensivistas diante das situações que demandaram a advocacia do paciente, envolvendo a valorização do ser social e familiar no cenário da pandemia de COVID-19. Método estudo qualitativo, descritivo e exploratório, realizado nas cinco regiões do Brasil. Participaram do estudo 25 enfermeiros intensivistas. Os dados foram coletados por meio de uma entrevista semiestruturada e, posteriormente, submetidos à análise textual discursiva. Resultados os enfermeiros advogaram perante a equipe de saúde e pela presença da família dentro da Unidade de Terapia Intensiva. Com a pandemia de COVID-19, foram estabelecidas novas estratégias para advogar, promovendo a aproximação, de forma virtual, entre enfermeiros, pacientes e familiares, bem como a permanência dos familiares no ambiente de terapia intensiva, quando necessário, para que os enfermeiros conhecessem melhor o paciente e integrassem a família ao cuidado. Considerações finais e implicações para a prática as estratégias utilizadas para agir em prol do paciente se deram por meio da aproximação entre enfermeiros e familiares; por meio da instrução de familiares para que advoguem pelo paciente; e pela defesa da presença familiar dentro da Unidade de Terapia Intensiva.

Resumen Objetivo comprender las estrategias utilizadas por los enfermeros de cuidados intensivos frente a situaciones que exigían la defensa del paciente, involucrando la valorización del ser social y familiar en el escenario de la pandemia de COVID-19. Método estudio cualitativo, descriptivo y exploratorio, realizado en las cinco regiones de Brasil. 25 enfermeras de cuidados intensivos participaron en el estudio. Los datos fueron recolectados a través de una entrevista semiestructurada y posteriormente sometidos al análisis textual discursivo. Resultados los enfermeros abogaron ante el equipo de salud y por la presencia de la familia en la Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos. Con la pandemia del COVID-19, se establecieron nuevas estrategias para abogar, promoviendo el acercamiento virtual entre enfermeros, pacientes y familiares, así como la permanencia de los familiares en el ambiente de cuidados intensivos cuando sea necesario, para que los enfermeros puedan conocerse entre sí. mejorar al paciente e integrar a la familia en el cuidado. Conclusión e implicaciones para la práctica las estrategias utilizadas para actuar en nombre del paciente se llevaron a cabo a través del acercamiento entre enfermeras y familiares; instruyendo a los familiares para que defiendan al paciente; y por la defensa de la presencia familiar dentro de la Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos.

Abstract Objective to understand the strategies used by intensive care nurses in the face of situations that required patient advocacy, involving the appreciation of social and family being during the COVID-19 pandemic. Method this is a qualitative, descriptive and exploratory study, carried out in the five regions of Brazil. A total of 25 intensive care nurses participated in the study. Data were collected through a semi-structured interview and subsequently subjected to discursive textual analysis. Results nurses advocated before the health team and for the family's presence within the Intensive Care Unit. With the COVID-19 pandemic, new strategies were established to advocate, promoting virtual rapprochement between nurses, patients and family members as well as the permanence of family members in intensive care environments when necessary so that nurses could know patients better and integrate the family into care. Conclusion and implications for practice the strategies used to act on behalf of patients were carried out for rapprochement between nurses and family members; for instructing family members to advocate for patients; and for the defense of family presence within the Intensive Care Unit.

Care Perceptions in two ICU Nursing Care Delivery Models: A qualitative-comparative approach / Percepciones del cuidado en dos modelos de atención de enfermería en UCI: aproximación cualitativa-comparativa / Percepções de cuidado em dois modelos de assistência de enfermagem em UTI: uma abordagem qualitativo-comparativa

Objective. Analyzed in compared perspective perceptions about nursing care, nurse-patient interaction, and nursing care outcomes in two ICU nursing staff in a high-complexity hospital institution, whose Nursing are Delivery Models (NCDM) are differentiated by the proportion of nurses and nurse assistants (NA) per team and by the assigned tasks and responsibilities. Methods. Particularist ethnography with adaptation to virtual methodologies. It included the sociodemographic characteristics of 19 nurses and 23 NA, 14 semi-structured interviews, review of patients' clinical records, and a focus group. Coding, categorization, inductive analysis, validation of results with participants were conducted and thematic saturation was achieved. Results. Four themes were identified: i) Professionalized care: a nursing of superior value; ii) senses and feelings of care; iii) nursing workload, generating factors and impacts; and iv) nursing missed care as concrete expression of the nursing workload. Conclusion. Compared nursing teams perceived nursing care in different ways, since it was experienced based on the assigned responsibilities and the possibilities of interaction with patients. Nursing care in the NCDM of the ICU with prevalence of direct bedside care by nurses with support from NA, it was perceived as holistic, comprehensive, and empathetic; whereas in the ICU with prevalence of delegated care to NA, it was related with administrative leadership and management of the ICU. Regarding the results, the NCDM of the ICU of direct bedside care by nurses showed better performance in patient safety and was closer to the skill level and legal responsibility of the nursing staff.

Objetivo. Analizar en perspectiva comparada las percepciones sobre el cuidado de enfermería, el relacionamiento con los pacientes y los resultados del cuidado en dos equipos de enfermería de UCI de una institución hospitalaria de alta complejidad, cuyos Modelos de Atención de Enfermería (MAE) se diferencian por la proporción de enfermeras y Auxiliares de Enfermería (AE) por equipo y por las tareas y responsabilidades asignadas. Métodos. Etnografía particularista con adaptación a metodologías virtuales. Incluyó la caracterización sociodemográfica a 19 enfermeras y 23 AE, 14 entrevistas semiestructuradas, revisión de historias clínicas de pacientes y un grupo focal. Se realizó codificación, categorización, análisis inductivo, validación de resultados con participantes y se logró la saturación temática. Resultados. Se identificaron cuatro temas: i) Cuidados profesionalizados: una enfermería de valor superior ii) sentidos y sentires del cuidado iii) carga de cuidado, factores generadores e impactos y iv) omisión del cuidado como expresión concreta de la carga de trabajo. Conclusión. Los equipos de Enfermería comparados percibieron el cuidado de enfermería de maneras distintas, pues se vivenció a partir de las responsabilidades asignadas y las posibilidades de relacionamiento con los pacientes. En el MAE de la UCI donde predomina el cuidado directo de enfermeras con apoyo AE, se percibió el cuidado como atención holista, integral y empática, mientras que en la UCI donde predomina el cuidado delegado a AE se relacionó con el liderazgo administrativo y la gestión de la sala de UCI. En cuanto a resultados, el MAE de la UCI de cuidado directo por enfermeras mostró mejor desempeño en seguridad del paciente y fue más cercano al nivel de competencias y de responsabilidad legal de los equipos de enfermería.

Objetivo. Analisar em perspectiva comparativa as percepções sobre o cuidado de enfermagem, a relação com os pacientes e os resultados do cuidado em duas equipes de enfermagem de UTI de uma instituição hospitalar de alta complexidade, cujos Modelos de Assistência de Enfermagem (MAE) diferem pela proporção de enfermeiros e auxiliares de enfermagem (AE) por equipe e por tarefas e responsabilidades atribuídas. Métodos.Etnografia particularista com adaptação a metodologias virtuais. Incluiu a caracterização sociodemográfica de 19 enfermeiros e 23 EA, 14 entrevistas semiestruturadas, revisão de prontuários e grupo focal. Codificação, categorização, análise indutiva, validação dos resultados com os participantes foram realizadas e a saturação temática foi alcançada. Resultados. Foram identificados quatro temas: i) Cuidado profissionalizado: enfermagem de valor superior ii) sentidos e sentimentos do cuidado iii) sobrecarga do cuidado, fatores geradores e impactos e iv) omissão do cuidado como expressão concreta da carga de trabalho. Conclusão. As equipes de Enfermagem compararam o cuidado de enfermagem percebido de diferentes maneiras, uma vez que foi vivenciado a partir das responsabilidades atribuídas e das possibilidades de relacionamento com os pacientes. No MAE da UTI onde predomina o cuidado direto por enfermeiros com apoio do EA, o cuidado foi percebido como cuidado holístico, integral e empático, enquanto na UTI onde predomina o cuidado delegado ao EA, estava relacionado à liderança administrativa e gestão da sala da UTI. Em termos de resultados, o MAE da UTI de cuidado direto por enfermeiros apresentou melhor desempenho na segurança do paciente e se aproximou mais do nível de competências e responsabilidade legal das equipes de enfermagem.

Assessment methods and tools to evaluate postgraduate critical care nursing students' competence in clinical placement. An integrative review.

AIM: To provide an overview of assessment methods and tools to evaluate postgraduate critical care nursing students' competence in clinical placement and to identify recommendations for future assessment methods. BACKGROUND: The purpose of postgraduate critical care nursing education is to educate professional, competent and caring critical care nurses and high-quality assessment strategies in clinical placement are of most importance. DESIGN: An integrative review following Whittemore and Knafl's framework and Prisma 2020 guidelines for systematic reviews. METHODS: Systematic searches were performed in June 2020 with an update in April 2021 using the following: Academic Search Premier, British Nursing Index, CINAHL, MEDLINE, SveMed+, Web of Science and the Joanna Briggs Institute databases. The systematic literature search and hand search yielded 380 studies. After screening and checking for eligibility, fifteen studies published between 2005 and 2020 were included in this review. The included studies were critically appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool for empirical studies and the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tool for literature reviews. RESULTS: Four qualitative, six quantitative, three mixed-methods and two literature review studies were included in this review. We identified that competence in postgraduate critical care nursing is a multidimensional concept and it is recommended to use a combination of assessment methods like self-assessment, observation and mentor evaluation. It is necessary to have discussions and reflections between the student, preceptor and lecturer, as well as written self- and mentor evaluation to provide formative and summative feedback to the students. The need to provide consistency and objectivity resulted in the development of competency assessment tools and they were mostly developed and validated as a collaboration between clinical sites and educational institutions. Most of the assessment tools consisted of domains reflecting holistic nursing, including both technical and non-technical skills. Domains reflecting evidence-based nursing practice were less common. CONCLUSIONS: We need valid and reliable instruments to assess postgraduate critical care nursing student's competence in placement. Innovation and further research regarding effective and accessible assessment methods, such as digital assessment tools, are needed to meet future needs. This may also stimulate collaboration to improve the international inconsistency in critical care nursing educations. We should be working towards common, international educational competence descriptions and assessment tools that are in line with the ever-changing critical care environment, including holistic nursing and continuous learning.

Refinement of the Intensive Care Unit Complexity Assessment and Monitoring to Ensure Optimal Outcomes III Acuity Tool.

BACKGROUND: The Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Complexity Assessment and Monitoring to Ensure Optimal Outcomes (CAMEO) acuity tool quantifies patient acuity in terms of nursing cognitive workload complexity. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to refine the ICU CAMEO II acuity tool. An expert panel of nursing staff from 4 pediatric ICUs convened to refine the CAMEO II across a large, freestanding children's hospital in the United States. METHOD: This study used a modified Delphi technique. RESULTS: Through a series of 4 Delphi rounds, the expert panel identified Domains of Care and nursing care items that were suitable to be collapsed or bundled. The number of Domains of Care decreased from 18 to 10. Each of the expert panel members then completed the ICU CAMEO II tool and the newly revised tool, ICU CAMEO III, on 5 to 10 patients. Sixty completed ICU CAMEO II tools, and ICU CAMEO III tools were available for comparison. The average difference of the 2 tools' total scores was 5 points (minimum, 4; maximum, 7). The level of agreement between the 2 tools by CAMEO Complexity Classification level (I-V) was 90%. DISCUSSION: The ICU CAMEO III acuity tool is a streamlined measure to describe and quantify the acuity of pediatric critical care nursing. Use of this acuity measure will support projection of staffing models, staffing assignments, and benchmarking across pediatric ICUs. Further research is underway to validate the CAMEO III for multisite use.

Do-not-resuscitate order in COVID-19 times: bioethics and professional ethics.

OBJECTIVE: To reflect about the do-not-resuscitation order at COVID-19 in Brazil, under bioethical focus and medical and nursing professional ethics. METHOD: Reflection study based on the principlist bioethics of Beauchamps and Childress and in professional ethics, problematizing actions, and decisions of non-resuscitation in the pandemic. RESULTS: It is important to consider the patient's clinic, appropriation of treatment goals for people with comorbidities, elderly people, with less chance of surviving to resuscitation, or less quality of life, with the palliative care team, to avoid dysthanasia, use of scarce resources and greater exposure of professionals to contamination. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 increased the vulnerabilities of professionals and patients, impacting professional decisions and conduct more widely than important values ​​such as the restriction of freedom. It propelled the population in general to rethink ethical and bioethical values ​​regarding life and death, interfering in decisions about them, supported by human dignity.

Acute Care Reimagined: Home Hospital Care Can Support the Triple Aim and Reduce Health Disparities.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Home hospital care (HHC) is a new and exciting concept that holds the promise of achieving all three components of the Triple Aim and reducing health disparities. As an innovative care delivery model, HHC substitutes traditional inpatient hospital care with hospital care at home for older patients with certain conditions. Studies have shown evidence of reduced cost of care, improved patient satisfaction, and enhanced quality and safety of care for patients treated through this model. The steady growth in Medicare Advantage enrollment and the expansion in 2020 of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Hospitals Without Walls program to include acute hospital care at home creates an opportunity for hospitals to implement such programs and be financially rewarded for reducing costs. Capacity constraints exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic suggest that now is the ideal time for healthcare leaders to test and advance the concept of HHC in their communities.

The Influence of the COVID-19 Pandemic on ICU Organization, Care Processes, and Frontline Clinician Experiences: A Qualitative Study.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in unprecedented adjustments to ICU organization and care processes globally. RESEARCH QUESTIONS: Did hospital emergency responses to the COVID-19 pandemic differ depending on hospital setting? Which strategies worked well to mitigate strain as perceived by intensivists? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Between August and November 2020, we carried out semistructured interviews of intensivists from tertiary and community hospitals across six regions in the United States that experienced early or large surges of COVID-19 patients, or both. We identified themes of hospital emergency responses using the four S framework of acute surge planning: space, staff, stuff, system. RESULTS: Thirty-three intensivists from seven tertiary and six community hospitals participated. Clinicians across both settings believed that canceling elective surgeries was helpful to increase ICU capabilities and that hospitals should establish clearly defined thresholds at which surgeries are limited during future surge events. ICU staff was the most limited resource; staff shortages were improved by the use of tiered staffing models, just-in-time training for non-ICU clinicians, designated treatment teams, and deployment of trainees. Personal protective equipment (PPE) shortages and reuse were widespread, causing substantial distress among clinicians; hands-on PPE training was helpful to reduce clinicians' anxiety. Transparency and involvement of frontline clinicians as stakeholders were important components of effective emergency responses and helped to maintain trust among staff. INTERPRETATION: We identified several strategies potentially to mitigate strain as perceived by intensivists working in both tertiary and community hospital settings. Our study also demonstrated the importance of trust and transparency between frontline staff and hospital leadership as key components of effective emergency responses during public health crises.

Critical care nursing service costs: Comparison of the top-down versus bottom-up micro-costing approach in Brazil.

AIM: To estimate the nursing service costs using a top-down micro-costing approach and to compare it with a bottom-up micro-costing approach. BACKGROUND: Accurate data of nursing cost can contribute to reliable resource management. METHOD: We employed a retrospective cohort design in an adult intensive care unit in São Paulo. A total of 286 patient records were included. Micro-costing analysis was conducted in two stages: a top-down approach, whereby nursing costs were allocated to patients through apportionment, and a bottom-up approach, considering actual nursing care hours estimated by the Nursing Activities Score (NAS). RESULTS: The total mean cost by the top-down approach was US$1,640.4 ± 1,484.2/patient. The bottom-up approach based on a total mean NAS of 833 ± 776 points (equivalent to 200 ± 86 hr of nursing care) yielded a mean cost of US$1,487.2 ± 1,385.7/patient. In the 268 patients for whom the top-down approach estimated higher costs than the bottom-up approach, the total cost discrepancy was US$4,427.3, while for those costed higher based on NAS, the total discrepancy was US$436.9. The top-down methodology overestimated costs for patients requiring lower intensity of care, while it underestimated costs for patients requiring higher intensity of care (NAS >100). CONCLUSIONS: The top-down approach may yield higher estimated ICU costs compared with a NAS-based bottom-up approach. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: These findings can contribute to an evidence-based approach to budgeting through reliable costing methods based on actual nursing workload, and to efficient resource allocation and cost management.

Value of pressure injury assessment scales for patients in the intensive care unit: Systematic review and diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To review and examine the evidence of the value of pressure injury risk assessment scales in intensive care patients. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, China Biomedical Literature Service System, VIP Database and CNIK from inception to February 2019. Two reviewers independently assessed articles' eligibility and risk of bias using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-II (QUADAS-2). We used a hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristics (HSROC) model to conduct the meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy. RESULT: Twenty-four studies were included, involving 16 scales and 15,199 patients in intensive care settings. Results indicated that the top four risk assessment scales were the Cubbin & Jackson Index (SEN = 0.84, SPE = 0.84, AUC = 0.90), the EVRUCI scale (SEN = 0.84, SPE = 0.68, AUC = 0.82), the Braden scale (SEN = 0.78, SPE = 0.61, AUC = 0.78), the Waterlow scale (SEN = 0.63, SPE = 0.46, AUC = 0.56). The Norton scale and the other eleven scales were tested in less than two studies and need to be further researched. CONCLUSION: The Braden scale, most frequently used in hospitals, is not the best risk assessment tool for critically ill patients. The Cubbin & Jackson Index has good diagnostic test accuracy. However, low quality of evidence and important heterogeneity were observed.

The J-IDEA Pandemic Planner: A Framework for Implementing Hospital Provision Interventions During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

BACKGROUND: Planning for extreme surges in demand for hospital care of patients requiring urgent life-saving treatment for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), while retaining capacity for other emergency conditions, is one of the most challenging tasks faced by health care providers and policymakers during the pandemic. Health systems must be well-prepared to cope with large and sudden changes in demand by implementing interventions to ensure adequate access to care. We developed the first planning tool for the COVID-19 pandemic to account for how hospital provision interventions (such as cancelling elective surgery, setting up field hospitals, or hiring retired staff) will affect the capacity of hospitals to provide life-saving care. METHODS: We conducted a review of interventions implemented or considered in 12 European countries in March to April 2020, an evaluation of their impact on capacity, and a review of key parameters in the care of COVID-19 patients. This information was used to develop a planner capable of estimating the impact of specific interventions on doctors, nurses, beds, and respiratory support equipment. We applied this to a scenario-based case study of 1 intervention, the set-up of field hospitals in England, under varying levels of COVID-19 patients. RESULTS: The Abdul Latif Jameel Institute for Disease and Emergency Analytics pandemic planner is a hospital planning tool that allows hospital administrators, policymakers, and other decision-makers to calculate the amount of capacity in terms of beds, staff, and crucial medical equipment obtained by implementing the interventions. Flexible assumptions on baseline capacity, the number of hospitalizations, staff-to-beds ratios, and staff absences due to COVID-19 make the planner adaptable to multiple settings. The results of the case study show that while field hospitals alleviate the burden on the number of beds available, this intervention is futile unless the deficit of critical care nurses is addressed first. DISCUSSION: The tool supports decision-makers in delivering a fast and effective response to the pandemic. The unique contribution of the planner is that it allows users to compare the impact of interventions that change some or all inputs.

The Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic's Effect on Critical Care Resources and Health-Care Providers: A Global Survey.

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has severely affected ICUs and critical care health-care providers (HCPs) worldwide. RESEARCH QUESTION: How do regional differences and perceived lack of ICU resources affect critical care resource use and the well-being of HCPs? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Between April 23 and May 7, 2020, we electronically administered a 41-question survey to interdisciplinary HCPs caring for patients critically ill with COVID-19. The survey was distributed via critical care societies, research networks, personal contacts, and social media portals. Responses were tabulated according to World Bank region. We performed multivariate log-binomial regression to assess factors associated with three main outcomes: limiting mechanical ventilation (MV), changes in CPR practices, and emotional distress and burnout. RESULTS: We included 2,700 respondents from 77 countries, including physicians (41%), nurses (40%), respiratory therapists (11%), and advanced practice providers (8%). The reported lack of ICU nurses was higher than that of intensivists (32% vs 15%). Limiting MV for patients with COVID-19 was reported by 16% of respondents, was lowest in North America (10%), and was associated with reduced ventilator availability (absolute risk reduction [ARR], 2.10; 95% CI, 1.61-2.74). Overall, 66% of respondents reported changes in CPR practices. Emotional distress or burnout was high across regions (52%, highest in North America) and associated with being female (mechanical ventilation, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.01-1.33), being a nurse (ARR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.13-1.53), reporting a shortage of ICU nurses (ARR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.05-1.33), reporting a shortage of powered air-purifying respirators (ARR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.09-1.55), and experiencing poor communication from supervisors (ARR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.16-1.46). INTERPRETATION: Our findings demonstrate variability in ICU resource availability and use worldwide. The high prevalence of provider burnout and its association with reported insufficient resources and poor communication from supervisors suggest a need for targeted interventions to support HCPs on the front lines.

Comparison of four pressure ulcer risk assessment tools in critically ill patients.

BACKGROUND: Critically ill patients are at a higher risk of developing pressure ulcers (PUs) than non-critically ill patients. Tools that aid in the early identification of those who are most at risk of PUs could help health care providers deliver early interventions and reduce unfavourable outcomes. AIMS: To compare the validity of four PU risk tools (the Braden scale, the Braden [ALB] scale, the CALCULATE, and the COMHON index) and to demonstrate the optimal cut-off points for each tool in critically ill patients. DESIGN: This was a prospective descriptive study. METHOD: This study was conducted in the intensive care units (ICUs) of a tertiary care hospital in Thailand from January to April 2019. Baseline characteristics were collected at admission to the ICUs. Skin assessment was evaluated every 24 hours. PU assessment scores were collected every 72 hours. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to compare the performance of the tests in predicting PUs. RESULTS: A total of 288 patients were recruited. The incidence of PUs was 11.1%. The Braden (ALB) scale performed the best based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (area under curve 0.74), followed by the CALCULATE (area under curve 0.71), the Braden (area under curve 0.67) scale, and the COMHON (area under curve 0.61) index. At the optimal cut-off point, the Braden (ALB) scale (≤13)) and the CALCULATE (≥3) were similar in terms of performance with an area under the curve of 0.69. CONCLUSION: The Braden (ALB) performed the best at predicting PU development in ICU patients. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The validity of all four PU risk tools was limited in Thai patients. The scales should thus be used in conjunction with clinical judgement to provide optimal outcomes. The development of better assessment tools for the prediction of PUs is required.

Nursing workload assessment in an intensive care unit: A 5-year retrospective analysis.

AIMS: To study the correlation between the workload of intensive care nursing teams and the sociodemographic, anthropometric and clinical characteristics of patients in critical condition in a Portuguese Intensive Care Unit (ICU) during a 5-year period. BACKGROUND: Currently, indices of nursing workload quantification are one of the resources used for planning and evaluating ICUs. Evidence shows that there are several factors related to critical patients and their hospitalisation which potentially influence the nursing workload. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort analysis of a health record database from adult patients admitted to a Portuguese ICU between 1 January 2015-31 December 2019. METHODS: Simplified Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System (TISS-28) scores of 730 adult patients. Three TISS-28 assessments were considered: first assessment, last assessment and average. The STROBE guidelines were used in reporting this study. RESULTS: The TISS-28 has an average of 34.2 ± 6.9 points at admission, which is considered a high nursing workload. A somewhat lower result was found for the discharge and average assessments. It shows that basic activities accounted for the highest percentage of time spent (38.0%), followed by the cardiovascular support category (26.5%). The TISS-28 shows consistent results throughout the study period, despite a small trend reduction in the last 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: Lower workloads were found for age ≤44 years and with a shorter length of stay. Higher workload was more probable in patients classified in Cullen Class IV (OR = 2.5) and with a normal to higher weight percentile (OR = 1.9 and 1.5, respectively). RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Knowledge of the factors influencing the nursing workload facilitates the implementation of rules to improve performance in nursing interventions, based on the redefinition of care priorities, increased productivity, human resources management and reduction of additional costs to the organisation, related to possible adverse events, among others.