The impact of social determinants of health on utilization of pediatric epilepsy surgery: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: A minority of pediatric patients who may benefit from epilepsy surgery receive it. The reasons for this utilization gap are complex and not completely understood. Patient and caregiver social determinants of health (SDOH) may impact which patients undergo surgery and when. The authors conducted a systematic review examining SDOH and surgical intervention in children with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). They aimed to understand which factors influenced time to surgical program referral or receipt of epilepsy surgery among children with DRE, as well as identify areas to characterize the SDOH impacting epilepsy surgery in children and guide efforts aimed to promote health equity in epilepsy. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted using the PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases in January 2022. Studies were analyzed by title and abstract, then full text, to identify all studies examining the impact of SDOH on utilization of epilepsy surgery. Studies meeting inclusion criteria were analyzed for SDOH examined, outcomes, and key findings. Quality was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. RESULTS: Of 4545 resultant articles, 18 were included. Studies examined social, cultural, and environmental factors that contributed to SDOH impacting epilepsy surgery. Patients who underwent surgical evaluation were found to be most commonly White and privately insured and have college-educated caregivers. Five studies found differences in time to referral/surgery or rates of surgery by racial group, with most finding an increased time to referral/surgery or lower rates of surgery for those who were Hispanic and/or non-White. Four studies found that private insurance was associated with higher surgical utilization. Three studies found higher household income was related to surgical utilization. No studies examined biological, psychological, or behavioral factors that contributed to SDOH impacting epilepsy surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The authors conducted a systematic review exploring the impact of SDOH in DRE surgery utilization. They found that race, ethnicity, insurance type, caregiver educational attainment, and household income demonstrate relationships with pediatric epilepsy surgery. Further study is necessary to understand how these factors, and others not identified in this study, contribute to the low rates of utilization of epilepsy surgery and potential target areas for interventions aiming to increase equity in access to epilepsy surgery in children.

High-Value Epilepsy Care in the United States: Predictors of Increased Costs and Complications from the National Inpatient Sample Database 2016-2019.

BACKGROUND: For patients with medically refractory epilepsy, newer minimally invasive techniques such as laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) have been developed in recent years. This study aims to characterize trends in the utilization of surgical resection versus LITT to treat medically refractory epilepsy, characterize complications, and understand the cost of this innovative technique to the public. METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample database was queried from 2016 to 2019 for all patients admitted with a diagnosis of medically refractory epilepsy. Patient demographics, hospital length of stay, complications, and costs were tabulated for all patients who underwent LITT or surgical resection within these cohorts. RESULTS: A total of 6019 patients were included, 223 underwent LITT procedures, while 5796 underwent resection. Significant predictors of increased patient charges for both cohorts included diabetes (odds ratio: 1.7, confidence interval [CI]: 1.44-2.19), infection (odds ratio: 5.12, CI 2.73-9.58), and hemorrhage (odds ratio: 2.95, CI 2.04-4.12). Procedures performed at nonteaching hospitals had 1.54 greater odds (CI 1.02-2.33) of resulting in a complication compared to teaching hospitals. Insurance status did significantly differ (P = 0.001) between those receiving LITT (23.3% Medicare; 25.6% Medicaid; 44.4% private insurance; 6.7 Other) and those undergoing resection (35.3% Medicare; 22.5% Medicaid; 34.7% private Insurance; 7.5% other). When adjusting for patient demographics, LITT patients had shorter length of stay (2.3 vs. 8.9 days, P < 0.001), lower complication rate (1.9% vs. 3.1%, P = 0.385), and lower mean hospital ($139,412.79 vs. $233,120.99, P < 0.001) and patient ($55,394.34 vs. $37,756.66, P < 0.001) costs. CONCLUSIONS: The present study highlights LITT's advantages through its association with lower costs and shorter length of stay. The present study also highlights the associated predictors of LITT versus resection, such as that most LITT cases happen at academic centers for patients with private insurance. As the adoption of LITT continues, more data will become available to further understand these issues.

Resective Epilepsy Surgery, QUality of life and Economic evaluation (RESQUE): the change in quality of life after resective epilepsy surgery-protocol for a multicentre, prospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Resective epilepsy surgery is often seen as a last resort when treating drug-resistant epilepsy. Positive results on quality of life (QoL) and economic benefits after surgery argue for a less restrictive attitude towards epilepsy surgery for drug-resistant epilepsy. QoL and economic benefits are country-dependent. The objective of the Resective Epilepsy Surgery, QUality of life and Economic evaluation (RESQUE) trial is to evaluate the change in QoL before and after epilepsy surgery in Dutch people with drug-resistant epilepsy. The results will form part of an economic evaluation of epilepsy surgery in people with epilepsy (PWE) in The Netherlands. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A longitudinal prospective multicentre cohort study involving 100 PWE undergoing epilepsy surgery between 2019 and 2025 is being performed in three Dutch academic hospitals. Excluded are PWE who have a lower level of intelligence (TIQ<70) or who do not master the Dutch language. Before surgery and 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after surgery, PWE receive validated online questionnaires (QOLIE-31, EQ-5D, iMCQ and iPCQ) on QoL, cost of care, expectations and satisfaction. Primary outcome is the change in QoL. Secondary outcomes are change in generic QoL, seizure reduction (International League Against Epilepsy Outcome Classification), medical consumption, productivity, the correlation between QoL and seizure reduction and expectation of and satisfaction with the surgery. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study design has been approved by the Medical Ethics Review Committee (METC) of Maastricht UMC+ (2019-1134) and the Amsterdam UMC (vu). At the time of writing, UMC Utrecht is in the process of considering approval. The study will be conducted according to the Dutch Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act and the Declaration of Helsinki. The results will be publicly disclosed and submitted for publication in international peer-reviewed scientific journals. There is no veto on publication by the involved parties. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NL8278; Pre-results.

Clinical added value of interictal automated electrical source imaging in the presurgical evaluation of MRI-negative epilepsy: A real-life experience in 29 consecutive patients.

OBJECTIVE: During the presurgical evaluation, manual electrical source imaging (ESI) provides clinically useful information in one-third of the patients but it is time-consuming and requires specific expertise. This prospective study aims to assess the clinical added value of a fully automated ESI analysis in a cohort of patients with MRI-negative epilepsy and describe its diagnostic performance, by evaluating sublobar concordance with stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) results and surgical resection and outcome. METHODS: All consecutive patients referred to the Center for Refractory Epilepsy (CRE) of St-Luc University Hospital (Brussels, Belgium) for presurgical evaluation between 15/01/2019 and 31/12/2020 meeting the inclusion criteria, were recruited to the study. Interictal ESI was realized on low-density long-term EEG monitoring (LD-ESI) and, whenever available, high-density EEG (HD-ESI), using a fully automated analysis (Epilog PreOp, Epilog NV, Ghent, Belgium). The multidisciplinary team (MDT) was asked to formulate hypotheses about the epileptogenic zone (EZ) location at sublobar level and make a decision on further management for each patient at two distinct moments: i) blinded to ESI and ii) after the presentation and clinical interpretation of ESI. Results leading to a change in clinical management were considered contributive. Patients were followed up to assess whether these changes lead to concordant results on stereo-EEG (SEEG) or successful epilepsy surgery. RESULTS: Data from all included 29 patients were analyzed. ESI led to a change in the management plan in 12/29 patients (41%). In 9/12 (75%), modifications were related to a change in the plan of the invasive recording. In 8/9 patients, invasive recording was performed. In 6/8 (75%), the intracranial EEG recording confirmed the localization of the ESI at a sublobar level. So far, 5/12 patients, for whom the management plan was changed after ESI, were operated on and have at least one-year postoperative follow-up. In all cases, the EZ identified by ESI was included in the resection zone. Among these patients, 4/5 (80%) are seizure-free (ILAE 1) and one patient experienced a seizure reduction of more than 50% (ILAE 4). CONCLUSIONS: In this single-center prospective study, we demonstrated the added value of automated ESI in the presurgical evaluation of MRI-negative cases, especially in helping to plan the implantation of depth electrodes for SEEG, provided that ESI results are integrated into the whole multimodal evaluation and clinically interpreted.

Mapping Interictal activity in epilepsy using a hidden Markov model: A magnetoencephalography study.

Epilepsy is a highly heterogeneous neurological disorder with variable etiology, manifestation, and response to treatment. It is imperative that new models of epileptiform brain activity account for this variability, to identify individual needs and allow clinicians to curate personalized care. Here, we use a hidden Markov model (HMM) to create a unique statistical model of interictal brain activity for 10 pediatric patients. We use magnetoencephalography (MEG) data acquired as part of standard clinical care for patients at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. These data are routinely analyzed using excess kurtosis mapping (EKM); however, as cases become more complex (extreme multifocal and/or polymorphic activity), they become harder to interpret with EKM. We assessed the performance of the HMM against EKM for three patient groups, with increasingly complicated presentation. The difference in localization of epileptogenic foci for the two methods was 7 ± 2 mm (mean ± SD over all 10 patients); and 94% ± 13% of EKM temporal markers were matched by an HMM state visit. The HMM localizes epileptogenic areas (in agreement with EKM) and provides additional information about the relationship between those areas. A key advantage over current methods is that the HMM is a data-driven model, so the output is tuned to each individual. Finally, the model output is intuitive, allowing a user (clinician) to review the result and manually select the HMM epileptiform state, offering multiple advantages over previous methods and allowing for broader implementation of MEG epileptiform analysis in surgical decision-making for patients with intractable epilepsy.

Health care resource utilization and costs before and after epilepsy surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the demographics of epilepsy surgery utilization and its impact on health care resource use. METHODS: Retrospective descriptive study using the MarketScan commercial claims database. We studied children and adults who underwent epilepsy surgery in the USA in the period 2006-2019. Our main outcome was health care resource utilization. RESULTS: Among the 87,368 patients with refractory epilepsy, 2,011 (2.3%) patients underwent resective epilepsy surgery, 188 (0.2%) patients underwent partial or total hemispherectomy, and 183 (0.2%) patients underwent corpus callosotomy. The proportion of patients undergoing epilepsy surgery has barely increased in the period 2006 to 2019. The year of resective epilepsy surgery was associated with high healthcare costs per person-year [median (p25-p75): $140,322 ($88,749-$225,862)], but healthcare costs per person-year substantially decreased in the 5 years after compared to the 5 years before the year of resective epilepsy surgery [$7,691 ($2,738-$22,092) versus $18,750 ($7,361-$47,082), p-value < 0.0001]. This result held in all resective epilepsy surgery subgroups: children, adults, temporal, extratemporal, subdural EEG monitoring, stereoEEG monitoring, and no intracranial monitoring. Similarly, the year of hemispherectomy was associated with high healthcare costs per person-year [$260,983 ($154,791-$453,986)], but healthcare costs per person-year substantially decreased in the 5 years after compared to the 5 years before the year of hemispherectomy [$26,834 ($12,842-$52,627) versus $54,596 ($19,547-$136,412), p-value < 0.0001]. In contrast, the year of corpus callosotomy was associated with high healthcare costs per person-year [$162,399 ($108,150-$253,156)], but healthcare costs per person-year did not substantially decrease in the 5 years after than in the 5 years before the year of corpus callosotomy [$25,464 ($10,764-$69,338) versus $36,221 ($12,841-$85,747), p-value = 0.2142]. CONCLUSION: In privately insured patients in the USA, resective epilepsy surgery and hemispherectomy substantially decrease healthcare utilization in subsequent years. Epilepsy surgery may help contain costs in the field of epilepsy.

Cost-effectiveness of invasive monitoring strategies in epilepsy surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Drug-resistant epilepsy occurs in up to 40% of patients with epilepsy who may be considered for epilepsy surgery. For drug-resistant focal epilepsy, up to 50% of patients require invasive monitoring prior to surgery. Of the most common invasive monitoring strategies (subdural electrodes [SDEs] and stereo-electroencephalography [sEEG]), the most cost-effective strategy is unknown despite substantial differences in morbidity profiles. METHODS: Using data collected from an internationally representative sample published in available systematic reviews and meta-analyses, this economic evaluation study employs a decision analysis model to simulate the risks and benefits of SDE and sEEG invasive monitoring strategies. In this model, patients faced differing risks of morbidity, mortality, resection, and seizure freedom depending on which invasive monitoring strategy they underwent. A range of cost values was obtained from a recently published single-center cost-utility analysis. The model considers a base case simulation of a characteristic patient with drug-resistant epilepsy using clinical parameters obtained from systematic reviews of invasive monitoring available in the literature. The main outcome measure was the probability of a positive outcome after invasive monitoring, which was defined as improvement in seizures without a complication. Cost-effectiveness was measured using an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). RESULTS: Invasive monitoring with sEEG had an increased cost of $274 and increased probability of effectiveness of 0.02 compared with SDEs, yielding an ICER of $12,630 per positive outcome obtained. Sensitivity analyses varied parameters widely and revealed consistent model results across the range of clinical parameters reported in the literature. One-way sensitivity analyses revealed that invasive monitoring strategy costs were the most influential parameter for model outcome. CONCLUSIONS: In this analysis, based on available observational data and estimates of complication costs, invasive monitoring with either SDEs or sEEG was nearly equivalent in terms of cost-effectiveness.

Cost-effectiveness of surgical treatment compared to medical treatment in patients with drug-refractory epilepsy: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Approximately 30% of epilepsy patients develop a drug-refractory epilepsy, that is, seizures cannot be controlled with antiepileptic drugs. Surgery has been evaluated as an effective but costly form of treatment. The aim of this systematic review is to synthesize the available evidence on the cost-effectiveness of surgical treatment compared to medical treatment for these patients. METHOD: A systematic literature search was performed in MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library and the National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database until September 2022. Title, abstract and full-text screening were conducted by two researchers. Original studies published in English or German analyzing the cost-effectiveness of surgical compared to medical treatment were included. Study characteristics, effectiveness measures, costs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were extracted. The quality of studies was assessed using the Drummond checklist. RESULTS: Fourteen studies were included. Most studies evaluated surgery as cost-effective. The ICER per patient seizure free ranged from dominant to purchasing power parity US dollars (PPP-USD) 479,275. The ICER per 1% seizure reduction ranged from PPP-USD 227 to PPP-USD 342. The ICER per year without seizures was PPP-USD 4202 and the ICER per quality-adjusted life-year ranged from dominant to PPP-USD 90,874. The studies varied greatly in their methodology and time horizon. CONCLUSION: Surgical treatment is cost-effective compared to medical treatment, especially when a lifetime horizon is adopted. It is concluded that all disease-specific costs should be considered over a long period when assessing the cost-effectiveness of epilepsy treatment. From an economic perspective, efforts should be made to improve access to surgical treatment for patients with drug-refractory epilepsy.

Assessment of intraoperative diffusion EPI distortion and its impact on estimation of supratentorial white matter tract positions in pediatric epilepsy surgery.

The effectiveness of correcting diffusion Echo Planar Imaging (EPI) distortion and its impact on tractography reconstruction have not been adequately investigated in the intraoperative MRI setting, particularly for High Angular Resolution Diffusion Imaging (HARDI) acquisition. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of EPI distortion correction using 27 legacy intraoperative HARDI datasets over two consecutive surgical time points, acquired without reverse phase-encoded data, from 17 children who underwent epilepsy surgery at our institution. The data was processed with EPI distortion correction using the Synb0-Disco technique (Schilling et al., 2019) and without distortion correction. The corrected and uncorrected b0 diffusion-weighted images (DWI) were first compared visually. The mutual information indices between the original T1-weighted images and the fractional anisotropy images derived from corrected and uncorrected DWI were used to quantify the effect of distortion correction. Sixty-four white matter tracts were segmented from each dataset, using a deep-learning based automated tractography algorithm for the purpose of a standardized and unbiased evaluation. Displacement was calculated between tracts generated before and after distortion correction. The tracts were grouped based on their principal morphological orientations to investigate whether the effects of EPI distortion vary with tract orientation. Group differences in tract distortion were investigated both globally, and regionally with respect to proximity to the resecting lesion in the operative hemisphere. Qualitatively, we observed notable improvement in the corrected diffusion images, over the typically affected brain regions near skull-base air sinuses, and correction of additional distortion unique to intraoperative open cranium images, particularly over the resection site. This improvement was supported quantitatively, as mutual information indices between the FA and T1-weighted images were significantly greater after the correction, compared to before the correction. Maximum tract displacement between the corrected and uncorrected data, was in the range of 7.5 to 10.0 mm, a magnitude that would challenge the safety resection margin typically tolerated for tractography-informed surgical guidance. This was particularly relevant for tracts oriented partially or fully in-line with the acquired diffusion phase-encoded direction. Portions of these tracts passing close to the resection site demonstrated significantly greater magnitude of displacement, compared to portions of tracts remote from the resection site in the operative hemisphere. Our findings have direct clinical implication on the accuracy of intraoperative tractography-informed image guidance and emphasize the need to develop a distortion correction technique with feasible intraoperative processing time.

Cost of pre-surgical evaluation for epilepsy surgery: A single-center experience.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the cost and time taken to evaluate adults with drug-resistant focal epilepsy for potentially curative surgery. METHODS: We reviewed data on 100 consecutive individuals at a tertiary referral center evaluated for epilepsy surgery in 2017. The time elapsed between referral and either surgery or a definitive decision not to progress was measured. National Health Service tariffs applicable to our setting were used to estimate the total cost of evaluation for individuals following different routes through the pre-surgical pathway. After surgery, self-reported seizure freedom rates were obtained from each individual to assess the approximate cost of pre-surgical evaluation per additional person seizure-free. RESULTS: Of 100 individuals evaluated, 27 had surgery, 63 had a definitive decision not to have surgery, and ten were awaiting further investigations. The median duration of the pre-surgical evaluation was 29.7 months (IQR 18.6-44.1 months), with a median cost per person of £9138 (IQR £6984-£14,868). Those who proceeded to Stage Two investigations (including fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography, ictal single-photon emission computerized tomography and intracranial electroencephalography) had a higher cost and extended evaluation length. After a median of 3.1 (IQR 2.3-3.7) years, 15/27 people who had surgery were seizure-free. This equated to an approximate cost of £123,500 spent per additional person seizure-free. CONCLUSION: Pre-surgical evaluation is long and costly, particularly for those who require icEEG. For those with drug-resistant focal epilepsy, surgery is, however, associated with a greater chance of seizure freedom. The suitability and risk-benefit ratio of surgery should be considered at each step of the pre-surgical pathway.

Health Care System Costs Associated With Surgery and Medical Therapy for Children With Drug-Resistant Epilepsy in Ontario.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Improvement in seizure control after epilepsy surgery could lead to lower health care resource use and costs, but it is uncertain whether this could offset the high costs related to surgery. This study aimed to evaluate phase-specific and cumulative long-term health care costs of surgery compared to medical therapy in children with drug-resistant epilepsy from the health care payer perspective. METHODS: Children who were evaluated for epilepsy surgery and treated with surgery or medical therapy from 2003 to 2018 at the Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto were identified from chart review and linked to their health administrative databases in Ontario, Canada. Inverse probability of treatment weighting with stabilized weights was used to balance the baseline covariates between the 2 groups. Patients were assigned to presurgery, surgery, short-term (first 2 years), intermediate-term (2-5 years), and long-term (>5 years) postsurgery care phases on the basis of treatment trajectory. Phase-specific and cumulative long-term health care costs were evaluated. Costs were converted from Canadian to US dollars year 2018 value. RESULTS: There were 372 surgical and 258 medical patients. Costs were higher in surgical than medical patients for presurgery (3 and 39 weeks), surgery, and short-term care phase, and the attributable costs of surgery per 7 patient-days were $1,602 (95% CI $1,438-$1,785), $172 (95% CI $147-$185), $19,819 (95% CI $18,822-$20,932), and $28 (95% CI $22-$32), respectively. Costs were lower in surgical patients for intermediate- and long-term care phase, and the attributable costs were -$72 (95% CI -$124 to -$35) and -$94 (95% CI -$129 to -$63), respectively. In surgical patients, costs were highest for surgery followed by presurgery care phase, with hospitalizations accounting for the highest cost component. In medical patients, costs increased gradually from presurgery to long-term care phase. Cumulative costs were higher for surgical than medical patients in the first 7 years after surgery, but from 8 years on, costs were lower for surgical patients. DISCUSSION: This study demonstrated the long-term economic benefits of epilepsy surgery compared to medical therapy for the health care system with the use of real-world data, which would justify the high costs of surgery. The results will support future economic evaluation comparing minimally invasive treatment such as laser therapy to surgery.

Parents' experiences of their child's assessment on an epilepsy surgery pathway: A qualitative study.

PURPOSE: Children's epilepsy surgery services (CESS) in the UK aim to improve outcomes for young children by increasing access to surgery. Consideration for surgery is complex and time consuming, yet there is lack of research exploring how this process might impact on families. This study aimed to explore parents' experiences of their child consideration for epilepsy surgery to inform future service development and delivery. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews with parents of children (aged < six years) considered for surgery within the previous three years. Recruitment was through social media and purposive sampling of medical records. Data were analysed using a thematic and iterative approach. RESULTS: 15 parents of 14 children were interviewed (13 mothers and 2 fathers). Initial discussions of epilepsy surgery were described as 'shocking' but also as a source of hope. However, unclear communication between staff and parents, including lack of information about the steps, assessments/investigations and timeframes involved in the process of assessment for surgery led to some feeling 'out of control,' uncertain and in some cases distressed. Parents described examples of positive support from staff, yet many felt they needed additional general and emotional support throughout the epilepsy surgery pathway. CONCLUSIONS: Findings highlight the importance of providing clear and consistent information about the epilepsy surgery assessment to minimise parental distress and help facilitate a sense of control. Recommendations include providing parents with advance warning that surgery will be discussed at their next appointment, improved access to psychosocial and clinical psychological support and a step-by-step guide of the process with realistic timelines.

Persistent racial and ethnic disparities as a potential source of epilepsy surgery underutilization: Analysis of large national datasets from 2006-2016.

OBJECTIVE: High volume surgical epilepsy centers have reported a decrease in surgical resections and an increase in intracranial monitoring. Despite this increase in complexity, epilepsy surgery remains significantly underutilized. The goal of this study is to examine the utilization of and access to epilepsy surgery in the United States from 2006 to 2016. METHODS: We used administrative datasets from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) and Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to report national estimates of epilepsy surgery and changes in surgery types. We also examined disparities and barriers in access to epilepsy surgery. RESULTS: Inpatient epilepsy admissions increased from 2.41 to 5.78 per 100,000 between 2006 and 2016, while surgical epilepsy admissions plateaued after 2011. Open resections comprised 75 % of all surgical cases from 2006 to 2011 then decreased each year to 50 % in 2016 with both temporal and extratemporal resections decreasing proportionally. Intracranial monitoring increased in the last two years of the study due to an increase in SEEG/depth electrode cases. The multivariate analysis showed that patients with Medicaid (OR 0.75, 95 % CI 0.67-0.83) and Medicare (OR 0.62, 95 % CI 0.54-0.70) were significantly less likely to undergo epilepsy surgery compared to those with private insurance. Black patients were less likely to undergo epilepsy surgery than White or Hispanic patients (OR 0.57, 95 % CI 0.49-0.67). No significant difference was found in epilepsy surgery rates after implementation of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) in 2014. CONCLUSION: This study identifies recent trends in epilepsy surgical approaches and suggests that improving access to care does not necessarily address disparities present in the treatment of epilepsy patients who need surgical care.

An Assessment of Neurosurgery Resident Clinical and Socioeconomic Training: The 2013 Council of State Neurosurgical Societies Postresidency Survey Results.

OBJECTIVE: The Council of State Neurosurgical Societies surveyed neurosurgeons applying for oral board certification in 2008 to assess their preparedness to practice. This survey was repeated in 2013 for a subsequent group of board applicants to evaluate the quality of neurosurgery training and identify opportunities for improvement. METHODS: Applicants for the American Board of Neurological Surgeons oral examination from 2008 to 2013 were provided an anonymous survey focused on clinical and socioeconomic skills. Survey responses were compared with the published results of a similar survey using an inferential statistical analysis. RESULTS: In total, 110 of 655 neurosurgeons responded (response rate 16.8%). Significantly more respondents from the 2013 survey felt prepared to perform the following techniques: angiography, endoscopic surgery, anterior lumbar interbody fusion, posterior lumbar interbody fusion, transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, kyphoplasty, and deep brain stimulation. Significantly more respondents in 2013 attested to receiving appropriate education on Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act and pay-for-performance practice models of health care. However, significantly fewer respondents in 2013 felt prepared in open vascular neurosurgery techniques. In both surveys, fewer than 35% of respondents felt adequately prepared in endovascular neurosurgery techniques, medical coding, negotiating an employment contract, and issues regarding practice management and the economics of neurosurgery. CONCLUSIONS: The 2013 survey suggests that candidates for board certification in neurosurgery perceive themselves to be adequately prepared to independently perform nearly all neurosurgical procedures. However, additional work is required to optimize neurosurgery training in endovascular procedures and the socioeconomic aspects of neurosurgery practice.

Predictors of Quality of Life in Patients with Drug Resistant Epilepsy after Neurosurgical Treatment: One-Year Follow-Up.

BACKGROUND: Invasive neurosurgical treatment or minimally invasive neurosurgical treatment are methods of choice for the treatment of patients with drug resistant epilepsy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of neurosurgical treatment and the quality of life of patients with drug resistant epilepsy and to determine what are the potential predictors of quality of life of patients with drug resistant epilepsy one year after neurosurgical treatment. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The research was performed at the Referral Centre for Epilepsy, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Centre Zagreb from February 2015 to February 2020 with Ethics commitee approval. The study included 96 patients with drug resistant epilepsy who were examined for the quality of life before and one year after neurosurgical treatment using the form questionnaire "Quality of life in epilepsy" (QOILE-31) validated Croatian 1.0 version and the questionnaire to assess the degree of depression "Beck Depression Inventory I" (BDI-I) validated Croatian version. RESULTS: Of 96 patients with drug resistant epilepsy one year after neurosurgical treatment 46 (47.9%) patients remained completely free from epileptis seizures. Wilcoxon equivalent pair test showed that the number of epileptic seizures one year after neurosurgical treatment was significantly lower (median before neurosurgical treatment is 10; and after neurosurgical treatment is 1, p<0.001). The most informative potential statistically significant predictor variables of quality of life based on the criterion variables QOLIE-31 and BDI-I are: total disease duration in years (p=0.034), patient age (p=0.042), number of antiepileptics one year after neurosurgical treatment (p=0.001), the number of epileptic seizures per month (p=0.016), and social welfare rights (p=0.045). CONCLUSION: Neurosurgical treatment of patients with drug resistant epilepsy significantly reduces the number of epileptic seizures which significantly improves their overall quality of life one year after neurosurgical treatment.

Indication-based analysis of patient outcomes following deep brain stimulation surgery.

BACKGROUND: While considered a safe operation, deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been associated with various morbidities. We assessed differences in postsurgical complication rates in patients undergoing the most common types of neurostimulation surgery. METHODS: The National Readmission Database (NRD) was queried to identify patients undergoing neurostimulation placement with the diagnosis of Parkinson disease (PD), epilepsy, dystonia, or essential tremor (ET). Demographics and complications, including infection, pneumonia, and neurostimulator revision, were queried for each cohort and compiled. Readmissions were assessed in 30-, 90-, and 180-day intervals. We implemented nearest-neighbor propensity score matching to control for demographic and sample size differences between groups. RESULTS: We identified 3230 patients with Parkinson disease, 1289 with essential tremor, 965 with epilepsy, and 221 with dystonia. Following propensity score matching, 221 patients remained in each cohort. Readmission rates 30-days after hospital discharge for PD patients (15.5 %) were significantly greater than those for ET (7.8 %) and seizure patients (4.4 %). Pneumonia was reported for PD (1.6 %), seizure (3.3 %) and dystonia (1.7 %) patients but not individuals ET. No PD patients were readmitted at 30-days due to dysphagia while individuals treated for ET (6.5 %), seizure (1.6 %) and dystonia (5.2 %) were. DBS-revision surgery was performed for 11.48 % of PD, 6.52 % of ET, 1.64 % of seizure and 6.90 % of dystonia patients within 30-days of hospital discharge. CONCLUSION: 30-day readmission rates vary significantly between indications, with patients receiving DBS for PD having the highest rates. Further longitudinal studies are required to describe drivers of variation in postoperative outcomes following DBS surgery for different indications.

Resective epilepsy surgery: assessment of randomized controlled trials.

Epilepsy is the most common form of chronic neurologic disease. Here, we review the available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that examined the efficacy of resective epilepsy surgery in select patients suffering from medically intractable epilepsy (defined as persistent epilepsy despite two or more antiepileptic drugs [AEDs]). Three RCTs (two adult RCTs and one pediatric RCT) consistently supported the efficacy of resective surgery as treatment for epilepsy with semiology localized to the mesial temporal lobe. In these studies, 58-100% of the patients who underwent resective surgery achieved seizure freedom, in comparison to 0-13% of medically treated patients. In another RCT, the likelihood of seizure freedom after resective surgery was independent of the surgical approach (transSylvian [64%] versus subtemporal [62%]). Two other RCTs demonstrated that hippocampal resection is essential to optimize seizure control. But, no significant gain in seizure control was achieved beyond removing 2.5 cm of the hippocampus. Across RCTs, minor complications (deficit lasting < 3 months) and major complications (deficit > 3 months) ranged 2-5% and 5-11% respectively. However, nonincapacitating superior subquadrantic visual-field defects (not typically considered a minor or major complication) were noted in up to 55% of the surgical cohort. The available RCTs provide compelling support for resective surgery as a treatment for mesial temporal lobe epilepsy and offer insights toward optimal surgical strategy.

A needs assessment of pediatric epilepsy surgery in Haiti.

OBJECTIVE: Epilepsy disproportionately affects low- and/or middle-income countries (LMICs). Surgical treatments for epilepsy are potentially curative and cost-effective and may improve quality of life and reduce social stigmas. In the current study, the authors estimate the potential need for a surgical epilepsy program in Haiti by applying contemporary epilepsy surgery referral guidelines to a population of children assessed at the Clinique d'Épilepsie de Port-au-Prince (CLIDEP). METHODS: The authors reviewed 812 pediatric patient records from the CLIDEP, the only pediatric epilepsy referral center in Haiti. Clinical covariates and seizure outcomes were extracted from digitized charts. Electroencephalography (EEG) and neuroimaging reports were further analyzed to determine the prevalence of focal epilepsy or surgically amenable syndromes and to assess the lesional causes of epilepsy in Haiti. Lastly, the toolsforepilepsy instrument was applied to determine the proportion of patients who met the criteria for epilepsy surgery referral. RESULTS: Two-thirds of the patients at CLIDEP (543/812) were determined to have epilepsy based on clinical and diagnostic evaluations. Most of them (82%, 444/543) had been evaluated with interictal EEG, 88% of whom (391/444) had abnormal findings. The most common finding was a unilateral focal abnormality (32%, 125/391). Neuroimaging, a prerequisite for applying the epilepsy surgery referral criteria, had been performed in only 58 patients in the entire CLIDEP cohort, 39 of whom were eventually diagnosed with epilepsy. Two-thirds (26/39) of those patients had abnormal findings on neuroimaging. Most patients (55%, 18/33) assessed with the toolsforepilepsy application met the criteria for epilepsy surgery referral. CONCLUSIONS: The authors' findings suggest that many children with epilepsy in Haiti could benefit from being evaluated at a center with the capacity to perform basic brain imaging and neurosurgical treatments.

Did the COVID-19 pandemic silence the needs of people with epilepsy?

The COVID-19 pandemic shook European healthcare systems, with unavoidable gaps in the management of patients with chronic diseases. We describe the impact of the pandemic on epilepsy care in three tertiary epilepsy centres from Spain and Italy, the most affected European countries. The three epilepsy centres, members of the European EpiCARE network, manage more than 5,700 people with epilepsy. In Bologna and Barcelona, the hospitals housing the epilepsy centres were fully converted into COVID-19 units. We describe the reorganization of the clinics and report on the frequency of SARS-CoV-2 in people with epilepsy as well as the frequency of seizures in patients admitted to the COVID units. Finally, we elaborate on critical issues regarding the second phase of the pandemic. The activities related to epilepsy care were reduced to less than 10% and were deprioritized. Discharges were expedited and elective epilepsy surgeries, including vagal nerve stimulator implantations, cancelled. Hospitalizations and EEG examinations were limited to emergencies. The outpatient visits for new patients were postponed, and follow-up visits mostly managed by telehealth. Antiseizure medication weaning plans and changes in vagal nerve stimulator settings were halted. Among the 5,700 people with epilepsy managed in our centres, only 14 tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, without obvious impact on their epilepsy. None of the 2,122 patients admitted to COVID units experienced seizures among the early symptoms. Epilepsy care was negatively impacted by the pandemic, irrespective of COVID-19 epidemiology or conversion of the hospital into a COVID-19 centre. The pandemic did not silence the needs of people with epilepsy, and this must be considered in the planning of the second phase.