[Focal cortical dysplasia: visual assessment of MRI and MR morphometry data]. / Fokal'naya kortikal'naya displaziya: sravnitel'nyi analiz vizual'noi otsenki dannykh magnitno-rezonansnoi tomografii i magnitno-rezonansnoi morfometrii.

OBJECTIVE: Assessing the diagnostic significance of MR morphometry in determining the localization of focal cortical dysplasias (FCD). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 13 children after surgery for drug-resistant epilepsy caused by FCD type II and stable postoperative remission of seizures (Engel class IA, median follow-up 56 months). We analyzed the results of independent expert assessment of native MR data by three radiologists (HARNESS protocol) and MR morphometry data regarding accuracy of FCD localization. We considered 2 indicators, i.e. local cortical thickening and gray-white matter blurring. RESULTS: FCD detection rate was higher after MR morphometry compared to visual analysis of native MR data using the HARNESS protocol. MR morphometry also makes it possible to more often identify gray-white matter blurring as a sign often missed by radiologists (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: MR morphometry is an additional non-invasive method for assessing the localization of FCD.

Memory and language risk assessment with Wada test in patients candidates for epilepsy surgery. / Evaluación de la memoria y el lenguaje mediante el test de Wada en pacientes candidatos a cirugía de epilepsia.

AIM: To determine post-surgical cognitive risk and associated factors according to lesion location in a sample of patients evaluated for epilepsy surgery with Wada test at the Fundacion Instituto Neurologico de Colombia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An observational, retrospective, analytical study was completed in patients with drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy candidates for epilepsy surgery treated from 2001 to 2021, who completed the Wada test as part of the pre-surgical evaluation. A descriptive analysis of sociodemographic, clinical, imaging and neuropsychological variables was completed; a multivariate logistic regression was performed analyzing factors associated with resection risk in patients with left lesions. RESULTS A total of 369 patients were included, 54.74% of the cases were women, with a median age of seizure onset of 11 years. 92.66% of the cases had lesional epilepsy and 68.56% were secondary to hippocampal sclerosis. Left hemisphere was the most frequently affected (65.68%) being dominant for memory and language in most of the patients with a proportion of 42.82% and 81.3%, respectively. The median functional adequacy was 43.75 (IQR 0-75) and the functional reserve was 75 (IQR 25 -93.75). In 104 patients, the Wada test determined a resection risk. In patients with a left lesion, it was found that functional reserve (PRadjusted 0.99, CI 95% 0.9997-0.9998) and having a right hemispheric dominance for memory (PRadjusted 0.92, CI 95% 0.547-0.999) were protective factors for post-surgical resection risk. CONCLUSION: Wada test is a useful tool for surgical decision-making in patients with drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy. When considering cognitive risk, components such as memory dominance and functional reserve should be considered as protective factors for postsurgical cognitive function preservation in patients with left lesions.

TITLE: Evaluación de la memoria y el lenguaje mediante el test de Wada en pacientes candidatos a cirugía de epilepsia.Objetivo. Determinar el riesgo cognitivo posquirúrgico y factores asociados según la localización de la lesión en una muestra de pacientes evaluados para cirugía de epilepsia con el test de Wada en la Fundación Instituto Neurológico de Colombia. Materiales y métodos. Se realizó un estudio observacional, retrospectivo y analítico en pacientes con epilepsia farmacorresistente del lóbulo temporal candidatos a cirugía de epilepsia tratados entre 2001 y 2021, que completaron el test de Wada como parte de la evaluación prequirúrgica. Se realizó un análisis descriptivo de variables sociodemográficas, clínicas, imagenológicas y neuropsicológicas. Se realizó una regresión logística multivariada analizando factores asociados al riesgo de resección en pacientes con lesiones izquierdas. Resultados. Se incluyó a 369 pacientes, el 54,74% de los casos fueron mujeres, con una mediana de edad de inicio de las convulsiones de 11 años. El 92,66% de los casos presentó epilepsia lesional; de éstos, el 68,56% fue secundario a esclerosis hipocampal. El hemisferio izquierdo fue el más frecuentemente afectado (65,68%), y éste fue dominante para la memoria y el lenguaje en la mayoría de los pacientes, con una proporción del 42,82 y el 81,3%, respectivamente. La mediana de adecuación funcional fue de 43,75 (rango intercuartílico: 0-75) y la reserva funcional de 75 (rango intercuartílico: 25-93,75). En 104 pacientes, el test de Wada determinó un riesgo de resección. En pacientes con lesiones izquierdas se encontró que la reserva funcional (razón de prevalencia ajustada: 0,99; intervalo de confianza al 95%: 0,9997-0,9998) y tener dominancia del hemisferio derecho para la memoria (razón de prevalencia ajustada: 0,92; intervalo de confianza al 95%: 0,547-0,999) fueron factores asociados para determinar el riesgo de resección posquirúrgico en el test de Wada. Conclusión. El test de Wada es una herramienta útil para la toma de decisiones quirúrgicas en pacientes con epilepsia del lóbulo temporal farmacorresistente. Componentes como la dominancia de la memoria y la reserva funcional en el test de Wada deben considerarse como factores que se deben tener en cuenta en la predicción de la preservación de la función cognitiva posquirúrgica en pacientes con lesiones izquierdas.

High-precision stereotactic irradiation for focal drug-resistant epilepsy versus standard treatment: a randomized waitlist-controlled trial (the PRECISION trial).

INTRODUCTION: The standard treatment for patients with focal drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) who are not eligible for open brain surgery is the continuation of anti-seizure medication (ASM) and neuromodulation. This treatment does not cure epilepsy but only decreases severity. The PRECISION trial offers a non-invasive, possibly curative intervention for these patients, which consist of a single stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) treatment. Previous studies have shown promising results of SRT in this patient population. Nevertheless, this intervention is not yet available and reimbursed in the Netherlands. We hypothesize that: SRT is a superior treatment option compared to palliative standard of care, for patients with focal DRE, not eligible for open surgery, resulting in a higher reduction of seizure frequency (with 50% of the patients reaching a 75% seizure frequency reduction at 2 years follow-up). METHODS: In this waitlist-controlled phase 3 clinical trial, participants are randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either receive SRT as the intervention, while the standard treatments consist of ASM continuation and neuromodulation. After 2-year follow-up, patients randomized for the standard treatment (waitlist-control group) are offered SRT. Patients aged ≥ 18 years with focal DRE and a pretreatment defined epileptogenic zone (EZ) not eligible for open surgery will be included. The intervention is a LINAC-based single fraction (24 Gy) SRT treatment. The target volume is defined as the epileptogenic zone (EZ) on all (non) invasive examinations. The seizure frequency will be monitored on a daily basis using an electronic diary and an automatic seizure detection system during the night. Potential side effects are evaluated using advanced MRI, cognitive evaluation, Common Toxicity Criteria, and patient-reported outcome questionnaires. In addition, the cost-effectiveness of the SRT treatment will be evaluated. DISCUSSION: This is the first randomized trial comparing SRT with standard of care in patients with DRE, non-eligible for open surgery. The primary objective is to determine whether SRT significantly reduces the seizure frequency 2 years after treatment. The results of this trial can influence the current clinical practice and medical cost reimbursement in the Netherlands for patients with focal DRE who are not eligible for open surgery, providing a non-invasive curative treatment option. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT05182437. Registered on September 27, 2021.

Accounting for repeat intervention costs in the economic comparison of laser interstitial thermal therapy and anterior temporal lobectomy for treatment of refractory temporal lobe epilepsy.

OBJECTIVE: Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is an alternative to anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL) for the treatment of temporal lobe epilepsy that has been found by some to have a lower procedure cost but is generally regarded as less effective and sometimes results in a subsequent procedure. The goal of this study is to incorporate subsequent procedures into the cost and outcome comparison between ATL and LITT. METHODS: This single-center, retrospective cohort study includes 85 patients undergoing ATL or LITT for temporal lobe epilepsy during the period September 2015 to December 2022. Of the 40 patients undergoing LITT, 35 % (N = 14) underwent a subsequent ATL. An economic cost model is derived, and difference in means tests are used to compare the costs, outcomes, and other hospitalization measures. RESULTS: Our model predicts that whenever the percentage of LITT patients undergoing subsequent ATL (35% in our sample) exceeds the percentage by which the LITT procedure alone is less costly than ATL (7.2% using total patient charges), LITT will have higher average patient cost than ATL, and this is indeed the case in our sample. After accounting for subsequent surgeries, the average patient charge in the LITT sample ($103,700) was significantly higher than for the ATL sample ($88,548). A second statistical comparison derived from our model adjusts for the difference in effectiveness by calculating the cost per seizure-free patient outcome, which is $108,226 for ATL, $304,052 for LITT only, and $196,484 for LITT after accounting for the subsequent ATL surgeries. SIGNIFICANCE: After accounting for the costs of subsequent procedures, we found in our cohort that LITT is not only less effective but also results in higher average costs per patient than ATL as a first course of treatment. While cost and effectiveness rates will vary across centers, we also provide a model for calculating cost effectiveness based on individual center data.

The impact of social determinants of health on utilization of pediatric epilepsy surgery: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: A minority of pediatric patients who may benefit from epilepsy surgery receive it. The reasons for this utilization gap are complex and not completely understood. Patient and caregiver social determinants of health (SDOH) may impact which patients undergo surgery and when. The authors conducted a systematic review examining SDOH and surgical intervention in children with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). They aimed to understand which factors influenced time to surgical program referral or receipt of epilepsy surgery among children with DRE, as well as identify areas to characterize the SDOH impacting epilepsy surgery in children and guide efforts aimed to promote health equity in epilepsy. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted using the PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases in January 2022. Studies were analyzed by title and abstract, then full text, to identify all studies examining the impact of SDOH on utilization of epilepsy surgery. Studies meeting inclusion criteria were analyzed for SDOH examined, outcomes, and key findings. Quality was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. RESULTS: Of 4545 resultant articles, 18 were included. Studies examined social, cultural, and environmental factors that contributed to SDOH impacting epilepsy surgery. Patients who underwent surgical evaluation were found to be most commonly White and privately insured and have college-educated caregivers. Five studies found differences in time to referral/surgery or rates of surgery by racial group, with most finding an increased time to referral/surgery or lower rates of surgery for those who were Hispanic and/or non-White. Four studies found that private insurance was associated with higher surgical utilization. Three studies found higher household income was related to surgical utilization. No studies examined biological, psychological, or behavioral factors that contributed to SDOH impacting epilepsy surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The authors conducted a systematic review exploring the impact of SDOH in DRE surgery utilization. They found that race, ethnicity, insurance type, caregiver educational attainment, and household income demonstrate relationships with pediatric epilepsy surgery. Further study is necessary to understand how these factors, and others not identified in this study, contribute to the low rates of utilization of epilepsy surgery and potential target areas for interventions aiming to increase equity in access to epilepsy surgery in children.

High-Value Epilepsy Care in the United States: Predictors of Increased Costs and Complications from the National Inpatient Sample Database 2016-2019.

BACKGROUND: For patients with medically refractory epilepsy, newer minimally invasive techniques such as laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) have been developed in recent years. This study aims to characterize trends in the utilization of surgical resection versus LITT to treat medically refractory epilepsy, characterize complications, and understand the cost of this innovative technique to the public. METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample database was queried from 2016 to 2019 for all patients admitted with a diagnosis of medically refractory epilepsy. Patient demographics, hospital length of stay, complications, and costs were tabulated for all patients who underwent LITT or surgical resection within these cohorts. RESULTS: A total of 6019 patients were included, 223 underwent LITT procedures, while 5796 underwent resection. Significant predictors of increased patient charges for both cohorts included diabetes (odds ratio: 1.7, confidence interval [CI]: 1.44-2.19), infection (odds ratio: 5.12, CI 2.73-9.58), and hemorrhage (odds ratio: 2.95, CI 2.04-4.12). Procedures performed at nonteaching hospitals had 1.54 greater odds (CI 1.02-2.33) of resulting in a complication compared to teaching hospitals. Insurance status did significantly differ (P = 0.001) between those receiving LITT (23.3% Medicare; 25.6% Medicaid; 44.4% private insurance; 6.7 Other) and those undergoing resection (35.3% Medicare; 22.5% Medicaid; 34.7% private Insurance; 7.5% other). When adjusting for patient demographics, LITT patients had shorter length of stay (2.3 vs. 8.9 days, P < 0.001), lower complication rate (1.9% vs. 3.1%, P = 0.385), and lower mean hospital ($139,412.79 vs. $233,120.99, P < 0.001) and patient ($55,394.34 vs. $37,756.66, P < 0.001) costs. CONCLUSIONS: The present study highlights LITT's advantages through its association with lower costs and shorter length of stay. The present study also highlights the associated predictors of LITT versus resection, such as that most LITT cases happen at academic centers for patients with private insurance. As the adoption of LITT continues, more data will become available to further understand these issues.

Resective Epilepsy Surgery, QUality of life and Economic evaluation (RESQUE): the change in quality of life after resective epilepsy surgery-protocol for a multicentre, prospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Resective epilepsy surgery is often seen as a last resort when treating drug-resistant epilepsy. Positive results on quality of life (QoL) and economic benefits after surgery argue for a less restrictive attitude towards epilepsy surgery for drug-resistant epilepsy. QoL and economic benefits are country-dependent. The objective of the Resective Epilepsy Surgery, QUality of life and Economic evaluation (RESQUE) trial is to evaluate the change in QoL before and after epilepsy surgery in Dutch people with drug-resistant epilepsy. The results will form part of an economic evaluation of epilepsy surgery in people with epilepsy (PWE) in The Netherlands. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A longitudinal prospective multicentre cohort study involving 100 PWE undergoing epilepsy surgery between 2019 and 2025 is being performed in three Dutch academic hospitals. Excluded are PWE who have a lower level of intelligence (TIQ<70) or who do not master the Dutch language. Before surgery and 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after surgery, PWE receive validated online questionnaires (QOLIE-31, EQ-5D, iMCQ and iPCQ) on QoL, cost of care, expectations and satisfaction. Primary outcome is the change in QoL. Secondary outcomes are change in generic QoL, seizure reduction (International League Against Epilepsy Outcome Classification), medical consumption, productivity, the correlation between QoL and seizure reduction and expectation of and satisfaction with the surgery. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study design has been approved by the Medical Ethics Review Committee (METC) of Maastricht UMC+ (2019-1134) and the Amsterdam UMC (vu). At the time of writing, UMC Utrecht is in the process of considering approval. The study will be conducted according to the Dutch Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act and the Declaration of Helsinki. The results will be publicly disclosed and submitted for publication in international peer-reviewed scientific journals. There is no veto on publication by the involved parties. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NL8278; Pre-results.

A cost analysis of MR-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy for adult refractory epilepsy.

OBJECTIVE: MR-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is used increasingly for refractory epilepsy. The goal of this investigation is to directly compare cost and short-term adverse outcomes for adult refractory epilepsy treated with temporal lobectomy and LITT, as well as to identify risk factors for increased costs and adverse outcomes. METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) was queried for patients who received LITT between 2012 and 2019. Patients with adult refractory epilepsy were identified. Multivariable mixed-effects models were used to analyze predictors of cost, length of stay (LOS), and complications. RESULTS: LITT was associated with reduced LOS and overall cost relative to temporal lobectomy, with a statistical trend toward lower incidence of postoperative complications. High-volume surgical epilepsy centers had lower LOS overall. Longer LOS was a significant driver of increased cost for LITT, and higher comorbidity was associated with non-routine discharge. SIGNIFICANCE: LITT is an affordable alternative to temporal lobectomy for adult refractory epilepsy with an insignificant reduction in inpatient complications. Patients may benefit from expanded access to this treatment modality for both its reduced LOS and lower cost.

QUality of life and Economic evaluation after neuroSTimulation for Epilepsy (QUESTE) in adolescents and adults with drug-resistant epilepsy: protocol for a multicentre, prospective observational cohort study in The Netherlands.

INTRODUCTION: Epilepsy is one of the most common chronic neurological disorders. Antiseizure medication (ASM) is the first choice of treatment, however, 30% of epilepsy patients are drug-resistant. For these patients, neuromodulation can be an option, especially when epilepsy surgery is not possible or did not lead to seizure freedom. Epilepsy is associated with reduced quality of life (QoL), which heavily depends on seizure control.The most recent Cochrane reviews have shown that vagus nerve stimulation and deep brain stimulation of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus, lead to a responder rate OR of, respectively, 1.93 and 1.20. The question arises if neuromodulation for drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) will be more cost-effective than sole treatment with ASM. The current study aims to determine the change in QoL after neuromodulation. Secondarily, we will aim to study the cost-effectiveness of these treatments. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This prospective cohort study aims at including 100 patients aged 16 or above who will be referred for neuromodulation, from January 2021 to January 2026. After informed consent, QoL and other relevant parameters will be assessed at baseline, 6 months, 1, 2 and 5 years after surgery. Data on seizure frequency will be derived from patient charts. We expect that DRE patients will report better QoL after neuromodulation. Even if they would still report seizures, the treatment can be seen as useful. This is especially true when patients can participate in society again to a greater extent than before treatment. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The board of directors of participating centres all gave permission for this study to commence. The medical ethics committees decided that this study does not fall under the Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act (WMO). The findings of this study will be presented at (inter)national conferences and in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NL9033.

Clinical added value of interictal automated electrical source imaging in the presurgical evaluation of MRI-negative epilepsy: A real-life experience in 29 consecutive patients.

OBJECTIVE: During the presurgical evaluation, manual electrical source imaging (ESI) provides clinically useful information in one-third of the patients but it is time-consuming and requires specific expertise. This prospective study aims to assess the clinical added value of a fully automated ESI analysis in a cohort of patients with MRI-negative epilepsy and describe its diagnostic performance, by evaluating sublobar concordance with stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) results and surgical resection and outcome. METHODS: All consecutive patients referred to the Center for Refractory Epilepsy (CRE) of St-Luc University Hospital (Brussels, Belgium) for presurgical evaluation between 15/01/2019 and 31/12/2020 meeting the inclusion criteria, were recruited to the study. Interictal ESI was realized on low-density long-term EEG monitoring (LD-ESI) and, whenever available, high-density EEG (HD-ESI), using a fully automated analysis (Epilog PreOp, Epilog NV, Ghent, Belgium). The multidisciplinary team (MDT) was asked to formulate hypotheses about the epileptogenic zone (EZ) location at sublobar level and make a decision on further management for each patient at two distinct moments: i) blinded to ESI and ii) after the presentation and clinical interpretation of ESI. Results leading to a change in clinical management were considered contributive. Patients were followed up to assess whether these changes lead to concordant results on stereo-EEG (SEEG) or successful epilepsy surgery. RESULTS: Data from all included 29 patients were analyzed. ESI led to a change in the management plan in 12/29 patients (41%). In 9/12 (75%), modifications were related to a change in the plan of the invasive recording. In 8/9 patients, invasive recording was performed. In 6/8 (75%), the intracranial EEG recording confirmed the localization of the ESI at a sublobar level. So far, 5/12 patients, for whom the management plan was changed after ESI, were operated on and have at least one-year postoperative follow-up. In all cases, the EZ identified by ESI was included in the resection zone. Among these patients, 4/5 (80%) are seizure-free (ILAE 1) and one patient experienced a seizure reduction of more than 50% (ILAE 4). CONCLUSIONS: In this single-center prospective study, we demonstrated the added value of automated ESI in the presurgical evaluation of MRI-negative cases, especially in helping to plan the implantation of depth electrodes for SEEG, provided that ESI results are integrated into the whole multimodal evaluation and clinically interpreted.

Radiosurgical Corpus Callosotomy for Intractable Epilepsy: Retrospective Long-Term Safety and Efficacy Assessment in 19 Patients an Review of the Literature.

BACKGROUND: Some patients suffering from intractable epileptic seizures, particularly drop attacks (DAs), are nonremediable by curative techniques. Palliative procedure carries a significant rate of surgical and neurological complications. OBJECTIVE: To propose evaluation of safety and efficacy of Gamma Knife corpus callosotomy (GK-CC) as an alternative to microsurgical corpus callosotomy. METHODS: This study included retrospective analysis of 19 patients who underwent GK-CC between 2005 and 2017. RESULTS: Of the 19 patients, 13 (68%) had improvement in seizure control and 6 had no significant improvement. Of the 13/19 (68%) with improvement in seizures, 3 (16%) became completely seizure-free, 2 (11%) became free of DA and generalized tonic-clonic but with residual other seizures, 3 (16%) became free of DA only, and 5 (26%) had >50% reduction in frequency of all seizure types. In the 6 (31%) patients with no appreciable improvement, there were residual untreated commissural fibers and incomplete callosotomy rather than failure of Gamma Knife to disconnect. Seven patients showed a transient mild complication (37% of patients, 33% of the procedures). No permanent complication or neurological consequence was observed during the clinical and radiological workup with a mean of 89 (42-181) months, except 1 patient who had no improvement of epilepsy and then aggravation of the pre-existing cognitive and walking difficulties (Lennox-Gastaut). The median time of improvement after GK-CC was 3 (1-6) months. CONCLUSION: Gamma Knife callosotomy is safe and accurate with comparable efficacy to open callosotomy in this cohort of patients with intractable epilepsy suffering from severe drop attacks.

Disparities in pediatric drug-resistant epilepsy care.

INTRODUCTION: Epilepsy affects millions of children worldwide, with 20-40% experiencing drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) who are recommended for epilepsy surgery evaluation and may benefit from surgical management. However, many patients live with DRE for multiple years prior to surgical epilepsy referral or treatment or are never referred at all. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to describe factors associated with referral for epilepsy surgery in the USA, in order to identify disparities in DRE, characterize why they may exist, and recognize areas for improvement. METHODS: Pediatric patients diagnosed with DRE between January 1, 2004 and December 31, 2020 were identified from the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) Database. Patients treated with antiseizure medications (ASMs) only, ASMs plus vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), and ASMs plus cranial epilepsy surgery were studied regarding access to epilepsy surgery and disparities in care. This study used chi-square tests to determine associations between treatment time and preoperative factors. Preoperative factors studied included epilepsy treatment type, age, sex, race/ethnicity, insurance type, geographic region, patient type, epilepsy type, and presence of pediatric complex chronic conditions (PCCCs). RESULTS: A total of 18,292 patients were identified; 10,240 treated with ASMs, 5019 treated with ASMs + VNS, and 3033 treated with ASMs + cranial epilepsy surgery. Sex was not found to significantly vary among groups. There was significant variation in age, census region, race/ethnicity, patient type, presence of PCCCs, diagnosis, and insurance (p < 0.001). Those treated surgically, either with VNS or cranial epilepsy surgery, were 2 years older than those medically treated. Additionally, those medically treated were less likely to be living in the Midwest (25.46%), identified as non-Hispanic white (51.78%), have a focal/partial epilepsy diagnosis (8.74%), and be privately insured (35.82%). CONCLUSIONS: We studied a large administrative US database examining variables associated with surgical epilepsy evaluation and management. We found significant variation in treatment associated with age, US census region, race/ethnicity, patient type, presence of PCCCs, diagnosis, and health insurance type. We believe that these disparities in care are related to access and social determinants of health, and we encourage focused outreach strategies to mitigate these disparities to broaden access and improve outcomes in children in the USA with DRE.

Cost-effectiveness of invasive monitoring strategies in epilepsy surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Drug-resistant epilepsy occurs in up to 40% of patients with epilepsy who may be considered for epilepsy surgery. For drug-resistant focal epilepsy, up to 50% of patients require invasive monitoring prior to surgery. Of the most common invasive monitoring strategies (subdural electrodes [SDEs] and stereo-electroencephalography [sEEG]), the most cost-effective strategy is unknown despite substantial differences in morbidity profiles. METHODS: Using data collected from an internationally representative sample published in available systematic reviews and meta-analyses, this economic evaluation study employs a decision analysis model to simulate the risks and benefits of SDE and sEEG invasive monitoring strategies. In this model, patients faced differing risks of morbidity, mortality, resection, and seizure freedom depending on which invasive monitoring strategy they underwent. A range of cost values was obtained from a recently published single-center cost-utility analysis. The model considers a base case simulation of a characteristic patient with drug-resistant epilepsy using clinical parameters obtained from systematic reviews of invasive monitoring available in the literature. The main outcome measure was the probability of a positive outcome after invasive monitoring, which was defined as improvement in seizures without a complication. Cost-effectiveness was measured using an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). RESULTS: Invasive monitoring with sEEG had an increased cost of $274 and increased probability of effectiveness of 0.02 compared with SDEs, yielding an ICER of $12,630 per positive outcome obtained. Sensitivity analyses varied parameters widely and revealed consistent model results across the range of clinical parameters reported in the literature. One-way sensitivity analyses revealed that invasive monitoring strategy costs were the most influential parameter for model outcome. CONCLUSIONS: In this analysis, based on available observational data and estimates of complication costs, invasive monitoring with either SDEs or sEEG was nearly equivalent in terms of cost-effectiveness.

Mapping Interictal activity in epilepsy using a hidden Markov model: A magnetoencephalography study.

Epilepsy is a highly heterogeneous neurological disorder with variable etiology, manifestation, and response to treatment. It is imperative that new models of epileptiform brain activity account for this variability, to identify individual needs and allow clinicians to curate personalized care. Here, we use a hidden Markov model (HMM) to create a unique statistical model of interictal brain activity for 10 pediatric patients. We use magnetoencephalography (MEG) data acquired as part of standard clinical care for patients at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. These data are routinely analyzed using excess kurtosis mapping (EKM); however, as cases become more complex (extreme multifocal and/or polymorphic activity), they become harder to interpret with EKM. We assessed the performance of the HMM against EKM for three patient groups, with increasingly complicated presentation. The difference in localization of epileptogenic foci for the two methods was 7 ± 2 mm (mean ± SD over all 10 patients); and 94% ± 13% of EKM temporal markers were matched by an HMM state visit. The HMM localizes epileptogenic areas (in agreement with EKM) and provides additional information about the relationship between those areas. A key advantage over current methods is that the HMM is a data-driven model, so the output is tuned to each individual. Finally, the model output is intuitive, allowing a user (clinician) to review the result and manually select the HMM epileptiform state, offering multiple advantages over previous methods and allowing for broader implementation of MEG epileptiform analysis in surgical decision-making for patients with intractable epilepsy.

Cost-effectiveness of surgical treatment compared to medical treatment in patients with drug-refractory epilepsy: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Approximately 30% of epilepsy patients develop a drug-refractory epilepsy, that is, seizures cannot be controlled with antiepileptic drugs. Surgery has been evaluated as an effective but costly form of treatment. The aim of this systematic review is to synthesize the available evidence on the cost-effectiveness of surgical treatment compared to medical treatment for these patients. METHOD: A systematic literature search was performed in MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library and the National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database until September 2022. Title, abstract and full-text screening were conducted by two researchers. Original studies published in English or German analyzing the cost-effectiveness of surgical compared to medical treatment were included. Study characteristics, effectiveness measures, costs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were extracted. The quality of studies was assessed using the Drummond checklist. RESULTS: Fourteen studies were included. Most studies evaluated surgery as cost-effective. The ICER per patient seizure free ranged from dominant to purchasing power parity US dollars (PPP-USD) 479,275. The ICER per 1% seizure reduction ranged from PPP-USD 227 to PPP-USD 342. The ICER per year without seizures was PPP-USD 4202 and the ICER per quality-adjusted life-year ranged from dominant to PPP-USD 90,874. The studies varied greatly in their methodology and time horizon. CONCLUSION: Surgical treatment is cost-effective compared to medical treatment, especially when a lifetime horizon is adopted. It is concluded that all disease-specific costs should be considered over a long period when assessing the cost-effectiveness of epilepsy treatment. From an economic perspective, efforts should be made to improve access to surgical treatment for patients with drug-refractory epilepsy.

Racial and socioeconomic disparities in the advanced treatment of medically intractable pediatric epilepsy.

OBJECTIVE: Racial and ethnic disparities in healthcare have gained significant importance since the Institute of Medicine published its report on disparities in healthcare. There is a lack of evidence on how race and ethnicity affect access to advanced treatment of pediatric medically intractable epilepsy. In this context, the authors analyzed the latest Kids' Inpatient Database (KID) for racial/ethnic disparities in access to surgical treatment of epilepsy. METHODS: The authors queried the KID for the years 2016 and 2019 for the diagnosis of medically intractable epilepsy. RESULTS: A total of 29,292 patients were included in the sample. Of these patients, 8.9% (n = 2610) underwent surgical treatment/invasive monitoring. The mean ages in the surgical treatment and nonsurgical treatment groups were 11.73 years (SD 5.75 years) and 9.5 years (SD 6.16 years), respectively. The most common insurance in the surgical group was private/commercial (55.9%) and Medicaid in the nonsurgical group (47.7%) (p < 0.001). White patients accounted for the most common population in both groups, followed by Hispanic patients. African American patients made up 7.9% in the surgical treatment group compared with 12.9% in the nonsurgical group. African American (41.1%) and Hispanic (29.9%) patients had higher rates of emergency department (ED) utilization compared with the White population (24.6%). After adjusting for all covariates, the odds of surgical treatment increased with increasing age (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.053-1.067; p < 0.001). African American race (OR 0.513, 95% CI 0.443-0.605; p < 0.001), Hispanic ethnicity (OR 0.681, 95% CI 0.612-0.758; p < 0.001), and other races (OR 0.789, 95% CI 0.689-0.903; p = 0.006) had lower surgical treatment odds compared with the White population. Medicaid/Medicare was associated with lower surgical treatment odds than private/commercial insurance (OR 0.603, 0.554-0.657; p < 0.001). Interaction analysis revealed that African American (OR 0.708, 95% CI 0.569-0.880; p = 0.001) and Hispanic (OR 0.671, 95% CI 0.556-0.809; p < 0.001) populations with private insurance had lower surgical treatment odds than White populations with private insurance. Similarly, African American patients, Hispanic patients, and patients of other races with nonprivate insurance also had lower surgical treatment odds than their White counterparts after adjusting for all other covariates. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the KID, African American and Hispanic populations had lower surgical treatment rates than their White counterparts, with higher utilization of the ED for pediatric medically intractable epilepsy.

Stereoelectroencephalography in the preoperative assessment of patients with refractory focal epilepsy: experience at an epilepsy centre.

OBJECTIVE: Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) is a technique for preoperative evaluation of patients with difficult-to-localise refractory focal epilepsy (DLRFE), enabling the study of deep cortical structures. The procedure, which is increasingly used in international epilepsy centres, has not been fully developed in Spain. We describe our experience with SEEG in the preoperative evaluation of DLRFE. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In the last 8 years, 71 patients with DLRFE were evaluated with SEEG in our epilepsy centre. We prospectively analysed our results in terms of localisation of the epileptogenic zone (EZ), surgical outcomes, and complications associated with the procedure. RESULTS: The median age of the sample was 30 years (range, 4-59 years); 27 patients (38%) were women. Forty-five patients (63.4%) showed no abnormalities on brain MR images. A total of 627 electrodes were implanted (median, 9 electrodes per patient; range, 1-17), and 50% of implantations were multilobar. The EZ was identified in 64 patients (90.1%), and was extratemporal or temporal plus in 66% of the cases. Follow-up was over one year in 55 of the 61 patients undergoing surgery: in the last year of follow-up, 58.2% were seizure-free (Engel Epilepsy Surgery Outcome Scale class I) and 76.4% had good outcomes (Engel I-II). Three patients (4.2%) presented brain haemorrhages. CONCLUSION: SEEG enables localisation of the EZ in patients in whom this was previously impossible, offering better surgical outcomes than other invasive techniques while having a relatively low rate of complications.

Cost of pre-surgical evaluation for epilepsy surgery: A single-center experience.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the cost and time taken to evaluate adults with drug-resistant focal epilepsy for potentially curative surgery. METHODS: We reviewed data on 100 consecutive individuals at a tertiary referral center evaluated for epilepsy surgery in 2017. The time elapsed between referral and either surgery or a definitive decision not to progress was measured. National Health Service tariffs applicable to our setting were used to estimate the total cost of evaluation for individuals following different routes through the pre-surgical pathway. After surgery, self-reported seizure freedom rates were obtained from each individual to assess the approximate cost of pre-surgical evaluation per additional person seizure-free. RESULTS: Of 100 individuals evaluated, 27 had surgery, 63 had a definitive decision not to have surgery, and ten were awaiting further investigations. The median duration of the pre-surgical evaluation was 29.7 months (IQR 18.6-44.1 months), with a median cost per person of £9138 (IQR £6984-£14,868). Those who proceeded to Stage Two investigations (including fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography, ictal single-photon emission computerized tomography and intracranial electroencephalography) had a higher cost and extended evaluation length. After a median of 3.1 (IQR 2.3-3.7) years, 15/27 people who had surgery were seizure-free. This equated to an approximate cost of £123,500 spent per additional person seizure-free. CONCLUSION: Pre-surgical evaluation is long and costly, particularly for those who require icEEG. For those with drug-resistant focal epilepsy, surgery is, however, associated with a greater chance of seizure freedom. The suitability and risk-benefit ratio of surgery should be considered at each step of the pre-surgical pathway.

Health Care System Costs Associated With Surgery and Medical Therapy for Children With Drug-Resistant Epilepsy in Ontario.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Improvement in seizure control after epilepsy surgery could lead to lower health care resource use and costs, but it is uncertain whether this could offset the high costs related to surgery. This study aimed to evaluate phase-specific and cumulative long-term health care costs of surgery compared to medical therapy in children with drug-resistant epilepsy from the health care payer perspective. METHODS: Children who were evaluated for epilepsy surgery and treated with surgery or medical therapy from 2003 to 2018 at the Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto were identified from chart review and linked to their health administrative databases in Ontario, Canada. Inverse probability of treatment weighting with stabilized weights was used to balance the baseline covariates between the 2 groups. Patients were assigned to presurgery, surgery, short-term (first 2 years), intermediate-term (2-5 years), and long-term (>5 years) postsurgery care phases on the basis of treatment trajectory. Phase-specific and cumulative long-term health care costs were evaluated. Costs were converted from Canadian to US dollars year 2018 value. RESULTS: There were 372 surgical and 258 medical patients. Costs were higher in surgical than medical patients for presurgery (3 and 39 weeks), surgery, and short-term care phase, and the attributable costs of surgery per 7 patient-days were $1,602 (95% CI $1,438-$1,785), $172 (95% CI $147-$185), $19,819 (95% CI $18,822-$20,932), and $28 (95% CI $22-$32), respectively. Costs were lower in surgical patients for intermediate- and long-term care phase, and the attributable costs were -$72 (95% CI -$124 to -$35) and -$94 (95% CI -$129 to -$63), respectively. In surgical patients, costs were highest for surgery followed by presurgery care phase, with hospitalizations accounting for the highest cost component. In medical patients, costs increased gradually from presurgery to long-term care phase. Cumulative costs were higher for surgical than medical patients in the first 7 years after surgery, but from 8 years on, costs were lower for surgical patients. DISCUSSION: This study demonstrated the long-term economic benefits of epilepsy surgery compared to medical therapy for the health care system with the use of real-world data, which would justify the high costs of surgery. The results will support future economic evaluation comparing minimally invasive treatment such as laser therapy to surgery.

Single-center cost comparison analysis of stereoelectroencephalography with subdural grid and strip implantation.

OBJECTIVE: Use of invasive stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) has gained traction recently. However, scant research has investigated the costs and resource utilization of SEEG compared with subdural grid (SDG)-based techniques in pediatric patients. Here, the authors have presented a retrospective analysis of charges associated with SEEG and SDG monitoring at a single institution. METHODS: The authors performed a retrospective case series analysis of pediatric patients with similar characteristics in terms of age, sex, seizure etiology, and epilepsy treatment strategy who underwent SEEG or SDG monitoring and subsequent craniotomy for resection of epileptogenic focus at St. Louis Children Hospital, St. Louis, Missouri, between 2013 and 2020. Financial data, including hospital charges, supplies, and professional fees (i.e., those related to anesthesia, neurology, neurosurgery, and critical care), were adjusted for inflation to 2020 US dollars. RESULTS: The authors identified 18 patients (9 underwent SEEG and 9 underwent SDG) with similar characteristics in terms of age (mean [range] 13.6 [1.9-21.8] years for SDG patients vs 11.9 [2.4-19.6] years for SEEG patients, p = 0.607), sex (4 females underwent SDG vs 6 females underwent SEEG, p = 0.637), and presence of lesion (5 patients with a lesion underwent SDG vs 8 underwent SEEG, p = 0.294). All patients underwent subsequent craniotomy for resection of epileptogenic focus. SEEG patients were more likely to have a history of status epilepticus (p = 0.029). Across 1 hospitalization for each SDG patient and 2 hospitalizations for each SEEG patient, SEEG patients had a significantly shorter mean operating room time (288 vs 356 minutes, p = 0.015), mean length of stay in the ICU (1.0 vs 2.1 days, p < 0.001), and tended to have a shorter overall length of stay in the hospital (8.4 vs 10.6 days, p = 0.086). Both groups underwent invasive monitoring for similar lengths of time (5.2 days for SEEG patients vs 6.4 days for SDG patients, p = 0.257). Time to treatment from the initial invasive monitoring evaluation was significantly longer in SEEG patients (64.6 vs 6.4 days, p < 0.001). Neither group underwent readmission within the first 30 days after hospital discharge. Seizure outcomes and complication rates were similar. After adjustment for inflation, the average total perioperative charges were $104,442 for SDG and $106,291 for SEEG (p = 0.800). CONCLUSIONS: Even though 2 hospitalizations were required for SEEG and 1 hospitalization was required for SDG monitoring, patients who underwent SEEG had a significantly shorter average length of stay in the ICU and operating room time. Surgical morbidity and outcomes were similar. Total perioperative charges for invasive monitoring and resection were approximately 2% higher for SEEG patients when corrected for inflation, but this difference was not statistically significant.