Population pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of micafungin against Candida species in obese, critically ill, and morbidly obese critically ill patients.

BACKGROUND: Dosing in obese critically ill patients is challenging due to pathophysiological changes derived from obesity and/or critical illness, and it remains fully unexplored. This study estimated the micafungin probability of reaching adequate 24-h area under the curve (AUC0-24h)/minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values against Candida spp. for an obese/nonobese, critically ill/noncritically ill, large population. METHODS: Blood samples for pharmacokinetic analyses were collected from 10 critically ill nonobese patients, 10 noncritically ill obese patients, and 11 critically ill morbidly obese patients under empirical/directed micafungin treatment. Patients received once daily 100-150 mg micafungin at the discretion of the treating physician following the prescribing information and hospital guidelines. Total micafungin concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Monte-Carlo simulations were performed and the probability of target attainment (PTA) was calculated using the AUC0-24/MIC cut-offs 285 (C. parapsilosis), 3000 (all Candida spp.), and 5000 (nonparapsilosis Candida spp.). Intravenous once-daily 100-mg, 150-mg, and 200-mg doses were simulated at different body weights (45, 80, 115, 150, and 185 kg) and age (30, 50, 70 and 90 years old). PTAs ≥ 90% were considered optimal. Fractional target attainment (FTA) was calculated using published MIC distributions. A dosing regimen was considered successful if the FTA was ≥ 90%. RESULTS: Overall, 100 mg of micafungin was once-daily administered for nonobese and obese patients with body mass index (BMI) ≤ 45 kg/m2 and 150 mg for morbidly obese patients with BMI > 45 kg/m2 (except two noncritically ill obese patients with BMI ~ 35 kg/m2 receiving 150 mg, and one critically ill patient with BMI > 45 kg/m2 receiving 100 mg). Micafungin concentrations in plasma were best described using a two-compartment model. Weight and age (but not severity score) were significant covariates and improved the model. FTAs > 90% were obtained against C. albicans with the 200 mg/24 h dose for all body weights (up to 185 kg), and with the 150 mg/24 h for body weights < 115 kg, and against C. glabrata with the 200 mg/24 h dose for body weights < 115 kg. CONCLUSION: The lack of adequacy for the 100 mg/24 h dose suggested the need to increase the dose to 150 mg/24 h for C. albicans infections. Further pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic studies should address optimization of micafungin dosing for nonalbicans Candida infections.

Overcoming the Resistance Hurdle: Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Target Attainment Analyses for Rezafungin (CD101) against Candida albicans and Candida glabrata.

Rezafungin (CD101) is a novel echinocandin antifungal agent with activity against Aspergillus and Candida species, including azole- and echinocandin-resistant isolates. The objective of these analyses was to conduct pharmacokinetic (PK)-pharmacodynamic (PD) target attainment analyses to evaluate single and once-weekly rezafungin dosing to provide dose selection support for future clinical studies. Using a previously developed rezafungin population PK model, Monte Carlo simulations were conducted utilizing the following three intravenous rezafungin regimens: (i) a single 400 mg dose, (ii) 400 mg for week 1 followed by 200 mg weekly for 5 weeks, and (iii) 400 mg weekly for 6 weeks. Percent probabilities of achieving the nonclinical PK-PD targets associated with net fungal stasis and 1-log10 CFU reductions from baseline for Candida albicans and Candida glabrata were calculated for each rezafungin regimen. At the MIC90 for C. albicans and C. glabrata, a single 400 mg dose of rezafungin achieved probabilities of PK-PD target attainment of ≥90% through week 3 of therapy for all PK-PD targets evaluated. When evaluating the multiple-dose (i.e., weekly) regimens under these conditions, percent probabilities of PK-PD target attainment of 100% were achieved through week 6. Moreover, high (>90%) probabilities of PK-PD target attainment were achieved through week 6 following administration of the weekly regimens at or above the MIC100 values for C. albicans and C. glabrata based on contemporary in vitro surveillance data. These analyses support the use of single and once-weekly rezafungin regimens for the treatment of patients with candidemia and/or candidiasis due to C. albicans or C. glabrata.

Population Pharmacokinetic Model and Pharmacokinetic Target Attainment of Micafungin in Intensive Care Unit Patients.

OBJECTIVE: To study the pharmacokinetics of micafungin in intensive care patients and assess pharmacokinetic (PK) target attainment for various dosing strategies. METHODS: Micafungin PK data from 20 intensive care unit patients were available. A population-PK model was developed. Various dosing regimens were simulated: licensed regimens (I) 100 mg daily; (II) 100 mg daily with 200 mg from day 5; and adapted regimens 200 mg on day 1 followed by (III) 100 mg daily; (IV) 150 mg daily; and (V) 200 mg daily. Target attainment based on a clinical PK target for Candida as well as non-Candida parapsilosis infections was assessed for relevant minimum inhibitory concentrations [MICs] (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute). Parameter uncertainty was taken into account in simulations. RESULTS: A two-compartment model best fitted the data. Clearance was 1.10 (root square error 8%) L/h and V 1 and V 2 were 17.6 (root square error 14%) and 3.63 (root square error 8%) L, respectively. Median area under the concentration-time curve over 24 h (interquartile range) on day 14 for regimens I-V were 91 (67-122), 183 (135-244), 91 (67-122), 137 (101-183) and 183 (135-244) mg h/L, respectively, for a typical patient of 70 kg. For the MIC/area under the concentration-time curve >3000 target (all Candida spp.), PK target attainment was >91% on day 14 (MIC 0.016 mg/L epidemiological cut-off) for all of the dosing regimens but decreased to (I) 44%, (II) 91%, (III) 44%, (IV) 78% and (V) 91% for MIC 0.032 mg/L. For the MIC/area under the concentration-time curve >5000 target (non-C. parapsilosis spp.), PK target attainment varied between 62 and 96% on day 14 for MIC 0.016. CONCLUSIONS: The licensed micafungin maintenance dose results in adequate exposure based on our simulations with a clinical PK target for Candida infections but only 62% of patients reach the target for non-C. parapsilosis. In the case of pathogens with an attenuated micafungin MIC, patients may benefit from dose escalation to 200 mg daily. This encourages future study.

Population pharmacokinetics of micafungin in ICU patients with sepsis and mechanical ventilation.

OBJECTIVES: To identify the factors associated with the interindividual pharmacokinetic (PK) variability of micafungin and to evaluate the probability of reaching the previously determined PK/pharmacodynamic efficacy thresholds (AUC/MIC >5000 for non-parapsilosis Candida sp. and ≥285 for Candida parapsilosis) with the recommended 100 mg daily dose in ICU patients with sepsis and mechanical ventilation. METHODS: One hundred patients were included and 436 concentrations were available for PK analysis performed with NONMEM software. PTA was determined by Monte Carlo simulations. RESULTS: Micafungin obeyed a two-compartment model with first-order elimination from the central compartment. Mean parameter estimates (percentage interindividual variability) were 1.34 L/h (34%) for clearance (CL), 11.80 L (38%) and 7.68 L (39%) for central (Vc) and peripheral (Vp) distribution volumes, respectively, and 4.67 L/h (37%) for distribution clearance. CL, Vc and Vp increased by 14% when the albumin level was ≤25 g/L and CL decreased by 25% when SOFA score was ≥10. Body weight was related to CL, Vc and Vp by allometric models. PTA was ≥90% in Candida albicans and Candida glabrata infections, except when the MIC was ≥0.015 mg/L, and ranged between 0% and 40% for C. parapsilosis infections with MIC ≥0.5 mg/L. CONCLUSIONS: A possible increase in the dose should be evaluated for infections due to C. parapsilosis and for infections due to C. albicans and C. glabrata with MICs ≥0.015 mg/L.

Dose optimization of voriconazole/anidulafungin combination against Aspergillus fumigatus using an in vitro pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model and response surface analysis: clinical implications for azole-resistant aspergillosis.

BACKGROUND: Combination therapy of voriconazole with an echinocandin is often employed in order to increase the efficacy of voriconazole monotherapy. METHODS: Four clinical Aspergillus fumigatus isolates with different in vitro susceptibilities to voriconazole (MIC 0.125-2 mg/L) and anidulafungin (MEC 0.008-0.016 mg/L) were tested in an in vitro pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model simulating human serum concentrations of standard dosages of voriconazole and anidulafungin. Fungal growth was assessed using galactomannan production and quantitative PCR. Drug concentrations were determined with bioassays. Pharmacodynamic interactions were assessed using Bliss independence analysis (BI) and Loewe additivity-based canonical mixture response-surface non-linear regression analysis (LA). Probability of target attainment (PTA) was estimated with Monte Carlo analysis for different doses of anidulafungin (25, 50 and 100 mg) and azole resistance rates (5%-25%). RESULTS: Synergy [BI 51% (8%-80%), LA 0.63 (0.38-0.79)] was found at low anidulafungin (fCmax/MEC <10) and voriconazole (fAUC/MIC <10) exposures, whereas antagonism [BI 12% (5%-18%, LA 1.12 (1.04-4.6)] was found at higher drug exposures. The largest increase in PTA was found with 25 mg of anidulafungin and voriconazole MIC distributions with high (>10%) resistance rates. PTAs for isolates with voriconazole MICs of 1, 2 and 4 mg/L was 78%, 12% and 0% with voriconazole monotherapy and 96%-100%, 68%-82% and 9%-20% with combination therapy, respectively. Optimal activity was associated with a voriconazole tCmin/MIC ratio of 1.5 for monotherapy and 0.75 for combination therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The present study indicated that the combination of voriconazole with low-dose anidulafungin may increase the efficacy and reduce the cost and potential toxicity of antifungal therapy, particularly against azole-resistant A. fumigatus isolates and in patients with subtherapeutic serum levels. This hypothesis warrants further in vivo verification.

Comparative Population Plasma and Tissue Pharmacokinetics of Micafungin in Critically Ill Patients with Severe Burn Injuries and Patients with Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infection.

Severely burned patients have altered drug pharmacokinetics (PKs), but it is unclear how different they are from those in other critically ill patient groups. The aim of the present study was to compare the population pharmacokinetics of micafungin in the plasma and burn eschar of severely burned patients with those of micafungin in the plasma and peritoneal fluid of postsurgical critically ill patients with intra-abdominal infection. Fifteen burn patients were compared with 10 patients with intra-abdominal infection; all patients were treated with 100 to 150 mg/day of micafungin. Micafungin concentrations in serial blood, peritoneal fluid, and burn tissue samples were determined and were subjected to a population pharmacokinetic analysis. The probability of target attainment was calculated using area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h/MIC cutoffs of 285 for Candida parapsilosis and 3,000 for non-parapsilosis Candida spp. by Monte Carlo simulations. Twenty-five patients (18 males; median age, 50 years; age range, 38 to 67 years; median total body surface area burned, 50%; range of total body surface area burned, 35 to 65%) were included. A three-compartment model described the data, and only the rate constant for the drug distribution from the tissue fluid to the central compartment was statistically significantly different between the burn and intra-abdominal infection patients (0.47 ± 0.47 versus 0.15 ± 0.06 h(-1), respectively; P < 0.05). Most patients would achieve plasma PK/pharmacodynamic (PD) targets of 90% for non-parapsilosis Candida spp. and C. parapsilosis with MICs of 0.008 and 0.064 mg/liter, respectively, for doses of 100 mg daily and 150 mg daily. The PKs of micafungin were not significantly different between burn patients and intra-abdominal infection patients. After the first dose, micafungin at 100 mg/day achieved the PK/PD targets in plasma for MIC values of ≤0.008 mg/liter and ≤0.064 mg/liter for non-parapsilosis Candida spp. and Candida parapsilosis species, respectively.

Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic adequacy of echinocandins against Candida spp. in intensive care unit patients and general patient populations.

This study evaluated whether contemporary echinocandin regimens achieved pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets in ICU patients and general patient populations (GPPs) and assessed caspofungin (CAS) regimens in hepatic impairment (HI) patients. A Monte Carlo simulation was performed using previously published data. Recommended dosing regimens of echinocandins in ICU patients, GPPs and healthy volunteers were evaluated: 70mg loading dose then 50mg maintenance dose (70/50mg) for CAS; 100mg q24h for micafungin (MCF); and 200/100mg for anidulafungin (ANF). Moreover, CAS 70mg and 100mg q24h in GPPs, and CAS 70/50mg and 70/35mg in mild and moderate HI patients, respectively, were evaluated. Cumulative fraction of response (CFR) was calculated for each dosing regimen. For Candida albicans, CFRs for the recommended doses of CAS, MCF and ANF were 95.8%, 13.5% and 50.5% in ICU patients and 96.3%, 42.4% and 61.6% in GPPs, respectively; for Candida glabrata, CFRs were 99.4%, 90.6% and 44.6% in ICU patients and 99.5%, 97.1% and 59.8% in GPPs. For Candida parapsilosis, CFRs of echinocandins for standard regimens were <70%; only CAS 100mg q24h achieved the target CFR. CAS 70/50mg and 70/35mg in mild and moderate HI patients were appropriate. Considerable interindividual variability was observed. For C. albicans and C. glabrata, CAS is good choice both for ICU and other patient populations, but for C. parapsilosis an increased dose should be considered. For MCF and ANF, administering higher doses with longer dosing intervals achieves better target attainment and should be investigated in clinical trials.

Caspofungin: Pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, clinical uses and treatment outcomes.

Over the past decade, echinocandins have emerged as first-line antifungal agents for many Candida infections. The echinocandins have a unique mechanism of action, inhibiting the synthesis of ß-1,3-d-glucan polymers, key components of the cell wall in pathogenic fungi. Caspofungin was the first echinocandin antifungal agent to become licensed for use. The objectives of this review are to summarize the existing published data on caspofungin, under the subject headings of chemistry and mechanism of action, spectrum of activity, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, clinical studies, safety, drug interactions, dosing, and an overview of the drug's current place in therapy.

Assessment of echinocandin regimens by pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis against Candida spp. in paediatric patients.

This study aimed to investigate the cumulative fraction of response of various echinocandin (caspofungin, micafungin and anidulafungin) dosing regimens against Candida spp. in paediatric patients with invasive fungal infections (IFIs). Monte Carlo simulations were performed using previously published pharmacokinetic parameters and pharmacodynamic data to evaluate the ability of each echinocandin regimen in terms of fAUC/MIC (free drug area under the concentration-time curve/minimum inhibition concentration ratio) targets of caspofungin, micafungin and anidulafungin. Pharmacodynamic targets were attained in paediatric patients by both caspofungin regimens as well as by a high micafungin dosing regimens against Candida albicans and Candida glabrata. However, the results for anidulafungin suggested that the dosing regimens recommended were not optimal for paediatric patients. In addition, the predicted efficacy of all of the echinocandins against Candida parapsilosis was low. This is the first study to assess caspofungin, micafungin and anidulafungin therapy using Monte Carlo simulation. These results rationalise and optimise the dosage regimens of caspofungin, micafungin and anidulafungin against C. albicans, C. glabrata and C. parapsilosis for paediatric patients with IFIs.

Plasma and peritoneal fluid population pharmacokinetics of micafungin in post-surgical patients with severe peritonitis.

OBJECTIVES: Limited information about the pharmacokinetics of micafungin in the peritoneal cavity is available. The aim of this study was to explore the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of micafungin in plasma and peritoneal fluid in post-surgical critically ill patients with proven or suspected intra-abdominal fungal infection. METHODS: Patients were administered 100 mg/day micafungin. Serial blood and peritoneal fluid samples were collected on day 1 and day 3 (steady-state) of treatment. Concentrations were determined by validated chromatography and were subject to a population pharmacokinetic analysis with Pmetrics(®). Monte Carlo simulations were performed for AUC0-24/MIC ratios in plasma. The PTA was calculated using AUC0-24/MIC cut-offs: 285 for Candida parapsilosis and 3000 for non-parapsilosis Candida spp. RESULTS: Ten patients were included; six were male. The median (range) age, APACHE II score and Mannheim peritonitis index were 72 (43-85) years, 15 (11-36) and 26 (8-37), respectively. On day 1, median (SD) penetration of micafungin into the peritoneal cavity was 30% (30%-40%). A three-compartment model adequately described the data. The mean (SD) estimates for clearance and volume of distribution of the central compartment were 1.27 (0.75) L/h and 9.26 (1.11) L, respectively. In most patients, the PTA in plasma was ≥ 90% for MICs of 0.008-0.016 mg/L for Candida spp. and 0.125-0.25 mg/L for C. parapsilosis. CONCLUSIONS: After the first dose, micafungin at 100 mg/day achieves pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets in plasma for Candida spp. and C. parapsilosis MICs of 0.008-0.016 and 0.125-0.25 mg/L, respectively.

Micafungin pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic adequacy for the treatment of invasive candidiasis in critically ill patients on continuous venovenous haemofiltration.

OBJECTIVES: To explore the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of micafungin in patients undergoing continuous venovenous haemofiltration (CVVH). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ten patients receiving CVVH treated with 100 mg/day micafungin were included (April-December 2012). CVVH was performed using polyethersulphone or polysulphone haemofilters. Dialysis membranes were not changed on sampling days. On Days 1 and 2, blood samples from arterial pre-filter and venous post-filter ports and ultrafiltrate samples were collected at the start and end of the infusion and at 3, 5, 8, 18 and 24 h. Concentrations were determined using HPLC. Values for the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC0-24) were calculated. Monte Carlo simulations were performed using pre-filter and post-filter AUC0-24/MIC ratios on Days 1 and 2. The probability of target attainment (PTA) was calculated using AUC0-24/MIC cut-offs: 285 (C. parapsilosis), 3000 (all Candida spp.) and 5000 (non-parapsilosis Candida spp.). Cumulative fraction responses (CFRs) were calculated using EUCAST MIC distributions. RESULTS: Mean post-filter AUC0-24 (mg·h/L) values were higher than pre-filter values on Day 1 (83.31 ±â€Š15.87 versus 71.31 ±â€Š14.24; P = 0.008) and Day 2 (119.01 ±â€Š27.20 versus 104.54 ±â€Š21.23; P = 0.005). PTAs were ≥90% for MICs of 0.125 mg/L (cut-off = 285), 0.016 mg/L (cut-off = 3000) and 0.008 mg/L (cut-off = 5000) on Day 1, and for MICs of 0.25 mg/L (cut-off = 285) and 0.016 mg/L (cut-off = 3000 and 5000) on Day 2, without differences between pre- and post-filter values. On Day 2, CFRs >90% were obtained for C. albicans (cut-off = 3000 and 5000) and C. glabrata (cut-off = 3000), but not for C. parapsilosis. CONCLUSIONS: There was no removal of micafungin by CVVH or need for dose adjustment, and there was optimal PK/PD coverage for non-parapsilosis Candida and equivalence of pre- and post-filter PD.

Non-clinical safety assessment and toxicokinetics of voriconazole and anidulafungin in the juvenile rat: a combination study design in support of a Paediatric Investigation Plan.

Anidulafungin and voriconazole are potent antifungal agents that may provide a powerful therapeutic option over current therapies when coadministered. A non-clinical combination toxicity study was required as part of the voriconazole Paediatric Investigation Plan. Rats received anidulafungin or voriconazole alone or in combination once daily from postnatal day (PND) 21-56 with a recovery period to PND 84. Doses used were based upon the approximate adult rat no observed adverse-effect level (NOAEL). Transient and reversible reductions in bodyweight, haematology, serum chemistry, liver weight and minimal liver changes were associated with anidulafungin. Voriconazole caused an increase in gamma-glutamyltransferase in female rats only. No increased toxicity was observed with the combination. Toxicokinetics were determined using a validated dual-analyte bioanalytical method. Systemic exposure at juvenile rat NOAELs was comparable to that found with adult rats in previous studies. There were no drug-drug interactions affecting exposure of either drug. Juvenile rats were not more sensitive to each drug dosed alone compared with adult rat data on the single drugs. No novel, additive or synergistic toxicities were noted with the combination in juvenile rats. This study will support future studies of the combination of voriconazole and anidulafungin in children with invasive fungal infection.

[Echinocandins: searching for differences. The example of their use in patients requiring continuous renal replacement therapy]. / Equinocandinas: buscando diferencias. El ejemplo de su uso en pacientes sometidos a técnicas continuas de reemplazamiento renal.

The echinocandins have a growing role in the treatment of fungal infections because of their novel mechanism of action. This is reflected in recently published management guidelines, but available in vitro data, animal studies, and clinical studies do not clearly differentiate the three agents in class. Comparative clinical efficacy among agents within the class, pharmacokinetic profiles in special populations, pharmacoeconomics justifications, and place in therapy have been largely unanswered. They share many common properties but marketing strategies of drug manufacturers are engaged in product differentiation. Although exist similarities in the pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles of the echinocandins, limited data have been published regarding their pharmacokinetics in continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) patients. The pharmacokinetics of drug removal in critically ill patients receiving CRRT is very complex, with multiple variables affecting clearance. This review outlines the basic principles that determine whether a dose adjustment is required. Two studies with data on PK parameters of micafungin and anidulafungin in CRRT patients have been published and are compared following that basic principles in the review.

Caspofungin: when and how? The microbiologist's view.

The echinocandins are antifungal agents, which act by inhibiting the synthesis of ß-(1,3)-D-glucan, an integral component of fungal cell walls. Caspofungin, the first approved echinocandin, demonstrates good in vitro and in vivo activity against a range of Candida species and is an alternative therapy for Aspergillus infections. Caspofungin provides an excellent safety profile and is therefore favoured in patients with moderately severe to severe illness, recent azole exposure and in those who are at high risk of infections due to Candida glabrata or Candida krusei. In vivo/in vitro resistance to caspofungin and breakthrough infections in patients receiving this agent have been reported for Candida and Aspergillus species. The types of pathogens and the frequency causing breakthrough mycoses are not well delineated. Caspofungin resistance resulting in clinical failure has been linked to mutations in the Fksp subunit of glucan synthase complex. European Committee for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing and Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute need to improve the in vitro susceptibility testing methods to detect fks hot spot mutants. Caspofungin represents a significant advance in the care of patients with serious fungal infections.

Anidulafungin for neonatal hematogenous Candida meningoencephalitis: identification of candidate regimens for humans using a translational pharmacological approach.

Hematogenous Candida meningoencephalitis (HCME) is a serious infection in premature neonates. Anidulafungin is an echinocandin antifungal agent with potent activity against Candida spp., but its efficacy and optimal regimens for human neonates with HCME are not known. A well-validated rabbit model of HCME was used to define pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) relationships of anidulafungin. A mathematical model was fitted to the entire data set. The experimental data were bridged to humans. A population PK model was fitted to the data from human neonates receiving anidulafungin receiving a loading dose of 3 mg/kg, followed by 1.5 mg/kg/day. Monte Carlo simulations were performed to identify candidate anidulafungin regimens for humans. All untreated rabbits succumbed by ≤96 h postinoculation. The PK of anidulafungin was linear with dose-dependent penetration into the cerebrum. Anidulafungin exerted a rapid antifungal effect that was apparent in the first dosing interval. Near-maximal antifungal activity was observed with dosages of 10 to 20 mg/kg/day. The bridging studies suggested that the current regimen of first 3 mg/kg, followed by 1.5 mg/kg/day, is suboptimal. Higher dosages were associated with progressively greater antifungal effect. Anidulafungin is effective for the treatment of experimental HCME. Higher dosages than those currently used for clinical care are required for maximal antifungal effect.

Use of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analyses to optimize therapy with the systemic antifungal micafungin for invasive candidiasis or candidemia.

Echinocandins have become a first-line therapy for invasive candidiasis (IC). Using phase 3 trial data for patients with IC, pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) relationships for efficacy for micafungin were examined. Micafungin exposures were estimated using a population pharmacokinetic model, and univariable and multivariable logistic regressions were used to identify factors associated with outcome, including the micafungin area under the concentration-time curve (AUC)/MIC ratio. Monte Carlo simulation was used to evaluate the probability of achieving AUC/MIC ratios associated with efficacy. Mycological and clinical success rates for evaluable cases were 89.4 and 90.9, respectively. MIC50s and MIC90s for Candida species inhibition were 0.008 and 0.5 mg/liter, respectively. The median AUC/MIC ratio was 15,511 (range, 41.28 to 98,716). Univariable analyses revealed a significant relationship between the AUC/MIC ratio and mycological response, with the worst response being among patients with lower (≤3,000) AUC/MIC ratios (P=0.005). For patients with Candida parapsilosis, AUC/MIC ratios of ≥285 were predictive of a higher mycological response (P=0.11). Multivariable logistic regression demonstrated the AUC/MIC ratio, APACHE II score, and history of corticosteroid use to be significant independent predictors of a favorable response. PK-PD target attainment analyses suggested that 76.7% and 100% of patients would achieve an AUC/MIC ratio of ≥3,000 for an MIC of 0.03 mg/liter and an AUC/MIC ratio of ≥285 for an MIC of <0.5 mg/liter, respectively. The identification of a lower AUC/MIC ratio target for C. parapsilosis than other Candida species suggests consideration of species-specific echinocandin susceptibility breakpoints and values that are lower than those currently approved by regulatory agencies.

Anidulafungin for the treatment of invasive candidiasis.

Candidaemia/invasive candidiasis (C/IC) is the most frequently occurring invasive fungal infection worldwide, with a particularly strong impact and high incidence in the intensive-care unit, where there is a need for new treatment options and strategies. The echinocandin anidulafungin has broad in vitro activity against a wide range of Candida species, along with favourable pharmacokinetics that allow administration in hepatic and renal impairment and with any comedication without the need for dose adjustments. The efficacy and safety of anidulafungin for the treatment of C/IC were demonstrated in a number of clinical studies and by some limited data from clinical practice. In a randomized comparative trial for the treatment of C/IC in adults, 76% of patients receiving anidulafungin and 60% of those given fluconazole were treated successfully (95% CI for difference: 4-27; p 0.01). Post hoc analyses suggest that anidulafungin is significantly more effective than standard-dose fluconazole for the treatment of candidaemia in critically ill patients. Anidulafungin is generally well tolerated, with commonly reported side effects including headache, hypokalaemia, gastrointestinal symptoms, abnormal liver function test results, and rash. In pharmaco-economic analyses, anidulafungin compared favourably with fluconazole (in terms of overall costs and hospital resource use) as well as with other echinocandins. Echinocandins, including anidulafungin, are now generally recommended as first-line therapy in moderately to severely ill patients, those with prior azole exposure, and patients with C/IC caused by Candida glabrata or Candida krusei.

Echinocandin antifungal drugs in fungal infections: a comparison.

This review compares the pharmacology, spectrum of antifungal activity, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, safety and clinical efficacy of the three licensed echinocandins: caspofungin, micafungin and anidulafungin. Echinocandins inhibit the synthesis of 1,3-ß-D-glucan, an essential component of the fungal cell wall, and represent a valuable treatment option for fungal infections. The echinocandins exhibit potent in vitro and in vivo fungicidal activity against Candida species, including azole-resistant pathogens. For all agents, strains with drug minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of ≤ 2 µg/mL are considered susceptible; the MIC at which 90% of isolates tested were inhibited (MIC90) values are typically <2 µg/mL but 100-fold higher MIC90 values are seen with Candida parapsilosis (1-2 µg/mL) and Candida guilliermondii (1-4 µg/mL). Activity is comparable between the three agents, although limited data indicate that anidulafungin may have low MICs against C. parapsilosis and Candida glabrata strains that demonstrate elevated MICs to caspofungin and micafungin. All three drugs have good fungistatic activity against Aspergillus spp., although minimal effective concentrations of micafungin and anidulfungin are 2- to 10-fold lower than those for caspofungin. Synergistic/additive in vitro effects of echinocandins when combined with a polyene or azole have been observed. Clinical resistance to the echinocandins is rare despite case reports of caspofungin resistance in several Candida spp. Resistance has been attributed to mutations in the FKS1 gene within two hot spot regions, leading to amino acid substitutions, mostly at position 645 (serine), yet not all FKS1 mutants have caspofungin MICs of >2 µg/mL. Of the three echinocandins, the in vitro 'paradoxical effect' (increased growth at supra-MIC drug concentrations) is observed least often with anidulafungin. All echinocandins have low oral bioavailability, and distribute well into tissues, but poorly into the CNS and eye. Anidulafungin is unique in that it undergoes elimination by chemical degradation in bile rather than via hepatic metabolism, has a lower maximum concentration and smaller steady state under the concentration-time curve but longer half-life than caspofungin or micafungin. In children, dosing should be based on body surface area. Daily doses of caspofungin (but not micafungin and anidulafungin) should be decreased (from 50 to 35 mg) in moderate liver insufficiency. All echinocandins display concentration-dependent fungicidal (for Candida) or fungistatic (for Aspergillus) activity. The postantifungal effect is 0.9-20 hours against Candida and <0.5 hours against Aspergillus. The echinocandins are well tolerated with few serious drug-drug interactions since they are not appreciable substrates, inhibitors or inducers of the cytochrome P450 or P-glycoprotein systems. In parallel with the greater clinical experience with caspofungin, this agent has a slightly higher potential for adverse effects/drug-drug interactions, with the least potential observed for anidulafungin. Caspofungin (but not micafungin or anidulafungin) dosing should be increased if coadministered with rifampicin and there are modest interactions of caspofungin with calcineurin inhibitors. All three agents are approved for the treatment of oesophageal candidiasis, candidaemia and other select forms of invasive candidiasis. Only micafungin is licensed for antifungal prophylaxis in stem cell transplantation, whereas caspofungin is approved for empirical therapy of febrile neutropenia. Caspofungin has been evaluated in the salvage and primary therapy of invasive aspergillosis. Combination regimens incorporating an echinocandin showing promise in the treatment of aspergillosis. However, echinocandins remain expensive to use.

Population pharmacokinetics of micafungin in neonates and young infants.

Micafungin is an echinocandin with potent activity against Candida spp. Hematogenous Candida meningoencephalitis (HCME) is a frequent complication of disseminated Candida infection in premature infants. A preclinical model of HCME suggests that micafungin may be an effective agent for this syndrome, but relatively high weight-based dosages are required. This prompted the further study of the safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of micafungin in infants. Here, we describe the population pharmacokinetics of micafungin in 47 infants with a proven or presumptive diagnosis of disseminated candidiasis, who received 0.75, 1.5, 3, 7, 10, and 15 mg/kg of micafungin. The drug was infused daily, and samples were taken in the first dosing interval and at steady state. Serum concentrations were measured using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Data were modeled using an allometric pharmacokinetic model using a three-fourths scaling exponent for clearance and parameters normalized to a 70-kg adult. Drug exposures were estimated using Monte Carlo simulation. Optimal sampling times were determined using D-optimal design theory. The fit of the allometric model to the data was highly acceptable. The pharmacokinetics of micafungin were linear. The weight-normalized estimates of clearance and volume of distribution approximated those previously described for adults. The original population parameter values could be recapitulated in the Monte Carlo simulations. A dosage of 10 mg/kg/day resulted in 82.6% of patients with areas under the concentration-time curve (AUCs) that are associated with near-maximal decline in fungal burden within the central nervous system (CNS).

Assessment of micafungin regimens by pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis: a dosing strategy for Aspergillus infections.

OBJECTIVES: A pharmacokinetic (PK)-pharmacodynamic (PD) analysis was conducted to assess various micafungin regimens for Candida and Aspergillus infections, as appropriate regimens have not been established, especially for Aspergillus infections. METHODS: Plasma drug concentrations (48 samples from 10 adult patients with haematological malignancies) were determined chromatographically, and used for population PK modelling and Monte Carlo simulation to evaluate the ability of regimens (1 h infusions) to attain genus-dependent PK-PD targets, namely fungistatic and fungicidal targets against Candida spp. [area under the plasma unbound (1%) drug concentration-time curve over 24 h/MIC (fAUC/MIC) = 10 and 20] and an effective concentration target against Aspergillus spp. (plasma unbound drug concentration = 0.05 mg/L). RESULTS: Mean (variance) values for two-compartment PK model parameters were: clearance, 0.762 L/h (15.4%); volume of central compartment, 9.25 L (24.6%); intercompartmental clearance, 7.02 L/h (fixed); and volume of peripheral compartment, 8.86 L (71.8%). The Monte Carlo simulation demonstrated that 50 mg once daily and 100 mg once daily for the fungistatic and fungicidal targets achieved a >95% probability of target attainment against Candida spp. To achieve such probability against Aspergillus spp., 250 mg once daily or 100 mg twice daily was required. CONCLUSIONS: These results rationalize the approved micafungin dosages for Candida infections (50 mg once daily for prophylaxis and 100-150 mg once daily for treatment), and on the basis of these results we propose a PK-PD-based dosing strategy for Aspergillus infections. A regimen of 200-250 mg/day should be initiated to ensure the likelihood of a favourable outcome. The regimen can be optimized by decreasing the dosing interval.