Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
World Neurosurg ; 87: 65-76, 2016 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26548828

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although prolactinomas are treated effectively with dopamine agonists, some have proposed curative surgical resection for select cases of microprolactinomas to avoid life-long medical therapy. We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing transsphenoidal surgery (either microsurgical or endoscopic) and medical therapy (either bromocriptine or cabergoline) with decision analysis modeling. METHODS: A 2-armed decision tree was created with TreeAge Pro Suite 2012 to compare upfront transsphenoidal surgery versus medical therapy. The economic perspective was that of the health care third-party payer. On the basis of a literature review, we assigned plausible distributions for costs and utilities to each potential outcome, taking into account medical and surgical costs and complications. Base-case analysis, sensitivity analysis, and Monte Carlo simulations were performed to determine the cost-effectiveness of each strategy at 5-year and 10-year time horizons. RESULTS: In the base-case scenario, microscopic transsphenoidal surgery was the most cost-effective option at 5 years from the time of diagnosis; however, by the 10-year time horizon, endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery became the most cost-effective option. At both time horizons, medical therapy (both bromocriptine and cabergoline) were found to be more costly and less effective than transsphenoidal surgery (i.e., the medical arm was dominated by the surgical arm in this model). Two-way sensitivity analysis demonstrated that endoscopic resection would be the most cost-effective strategy if the cure rate from endoscopic surgery was greater than 90% and the complication rate was less than 1%. Monte Carlo simulation was performed for endoscopic surgery versus microscopic surgery at both time horizons. This analysis produced an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $80,235 per quality-adjusted life years at 5 years and $40,737 per quality-adjusted life years at 10 years, implying that with increasing time intervals, endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery is the more cost-effective treatment strategy. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of the results of our model, transsphenoidal surgical resection of microprolactinomas, either microsurgical or endoscopic, appears to be more cost-effective than life-long medical therapy in young patients with life expectancy greater than 10 years. We caution that surgical resection for microprolactinomas be performed only in select cases by experienced pituitary surgeons at high-volume centers with high biochemical cure rates and low complication rates.


Assuntos
Bromocriptina/uso terapêutico , Árvores de Decisões , Ergolinas/uso terapêutico , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Antagonistas de Hormônios/uso terapêutico , Hiperprolactinemia/tratamento farmacológico , Microcirurgia/economia , Neuroendoscopia/economia , Neoplasias Hipofisárias/economia , Neoplasias Hipofisárias/terapia , Prolactinoma/economia , Prolactinoma/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Bromocriptina/economia , Cabergolina , Análise Custo-Benefício , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Ergolinas/economia , Feminino , Antagonistas de Hormônios/economia , Humanos , Hiperprolactinemia/etiologia , Expectativa de Vida , Masculino , Medicare , Microcirurgia/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Método de Monte Carlo , Neuroendoscopia/métodos , Neoplasias Hipofisárias/complicações , Neoplasias Hipofisárias/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hipofisárias/cirurgia , Prolactinoma/complicações , Prolactinoma/tratamento farmacológico , Prolactinoma/cirurgia , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Seio Esfenoidal/cirurgia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
2.
Drugs ; 64(18): 2125-41, 2004.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15341508

RESUMO

Cabergoline is a synthetic ergoline dopamine agonist with a high affinity for dopamine D2 receptors and a long elimination half-life. This agent provides continuous dopaminergic stimulation with once-daily administration. Adjuvant oral cabergoline is usually well tolerated and effective in controlling symptoms in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease experiencing response fluctuations to long-term levodopa therapy. In patients with early Parkinson's disease, cabergoline (with or without levodopa) is well tolerated and effective in controlling disease symptoms, and may reduce the risk of developing drug-induced motor complications. Data from two pharmacoeconomic analyses suggest that cabergoline may be a cost-effective treatment option versus levodopa in patients with early Parkinson's disease, and highlight the need for further evaluation of the drug in this indication.


Assuntos
Antiparkinsonianos/farmacologia , Ergolinas/farmacologia , Doença de Parkinson/tratamento farmacológico , Antiparkinsonianos/efeitos adversos , Antiparkinsonianos/economia , Antiparkinsonianos/uso terapêutico , Cabergolina , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Ergolinas/efeitos adversos , Ergolinas/economia , Ergolinas/uso terapêutico , Humanos
5.
Mov Disord ; 18(8): 898-905, 2003 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12889079

RESUMO

We evaluated the incremental cost-effectiveness of cabergoline compared with levodopa monotherapy in patients with early Parkinson's disease (PD) in the German healthcare system. The study design was based on cost-effectiveness analysis using a Markov model with a 10-year time horizon. Model input data was based on a clinical trial "Early Treatment of PD with Cabergoline" as well as on cost data of a German hospital/office-based PD network. Direct and indirect medical and nonmedical costs were included. Outcomes were costs, disease stage, cumulative complication incidence, and mortality. An annual discount rate of 5% was applied and the societal perspective was chosen. The target population included patients in Hoehn and Yahr Stages I to III. It was found that the occurrence of motor complications was significantly lower in patients on cabergoline monotherapy. For patients aged >/=60 years of age, cabergoline monotherapy was cost effective when considering costs per decreased UPDRS score. Each point decrease in the UPDRS (I-IV) resulted in costs of euro;1,031. Incremental costs per additional motor complication-free patient were euro;104,400 for patients <60 years of age and euro;57,900 for patients >/=60 years of age. In conclusion, this decision-analytic model calculation for PD was based almost entirely on clinical and observed data with a limited number of assumptions. Although costs were higher in patients on cabergoline, the corresponding cost-effectiveness ratio for cabergoline was at least as favourable as the ratios for many commonly accepted therapies.


Assuntos
Antiparkinsonianos/economia , Antiparkinsonianos/uso terapêutico , Tomada de Decisões , Ergolinas/economia , Ergolinas/uso terapêutico , Levodopa/economia , Levodopa/uso terapêutico , Doença de Parkinson/tratamento farmacológico , Doença de Parkinson/economia , Antiparkinsonianos/efeitos adversos , Cabergolina , Análise Custo-Benefício , Progressão da Doença , Ergolinas/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Levodopa/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Cadeias de Markov , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doença de Parkinson/diagnóstico , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA