Childhood Cancers Misdiagnosed as Tuberculosis in a High Tuberculosis Burden Setting.

BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis (TB) and childhood cancers have overlapping presentations and malignancies may be misdiagnosed as TB in high TB-burden settings. METHODS: This retrospective study investigated the diagnosis of TB in children with cancer registered in the Tygerberg Hospital Childhood Tumor Registry from 2008 to 2018. We studied children on anti-tuberculosis treatment (ATT) at cancer diagnosis or diagnosed with TB within 1 month of cancer diagnosis. We describe the circumstances and extent of this misdiagnosis, quantify the delay in therapy and document the outcomes of these children. RESULTS: Twenty-seven of 539 (5%) children in the registry started ATT before cancer diagnosis. Both pulmonary and extrapulmonary TB complicated the cancer diagnosis. Of the 27 patients on ATT at cancer diagnosis, 22 (81%) had contact with a TB case and in 6 of 12 children (50%) a tuberculin skin test was positive. At cancer diagnosis, 16/27 (59%) children had chest radiograph changes interpreted as TB with 11/27 (41%) regarded as suggestive of TB on expert review. The median diagnostic delay between TB and cancer diagnoses was 25 days (interquartile range 3.5-58). Of 539 children with cancer, 204 (38%) died of cancer, including 18/30 (60%) children on ATT at cancer diagnosis or diagnosed with TB within 1 month of cancer diagnosis (odds ratio 2.6; 95% confidence interval: 1.2-5.4; P = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: The clinical and radiologic overlap of TB and cancer causes diagnostic confusion in a significant number of children with cancer and may contribute to increased mortality.

Learning from patient safety incidents involving acutely sick adults in hospital assessment units in England and Wales: a mixed methods analysis for quality improvement.

OBJECTIVE: Six per cent of hospital patients experience a patient safety incident, of which 12% result in severe/fatal outcomes. Acutely sick patients are at heightened risk. Our aim was to identify the most frequently reported incidents in acute medical units and their characteristics. DESIGN: Retrospective mixed methods methodology: (1) an a priori coding process, applying a multi-axial coding framework to incident reports; and, (2) a thematic interpretative analysis of reports. SETTING: Patient safety incident reports (10 years, 2005-2015) collected from the National Reporting and Learning System, which receives reports from hospitals and other care settings across England and Wales. PARTICIPANTS: Reports describing severe harm/death in acute medical unit were identified. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incident type, contributory factors, outcomes and level of harm were identified in the included reports. During thematic analysis, themes and metathemes were synthesised to inform priorities for quality improvement. RESULTS: A total of 377 reports of severe harm or death were confirmed. The most common incident types were diagnostic errors (n = 79), medication-related errors (n = 61), and failures monitoring patients (n = 57). Incidents commonly stemmed from lack of active decision-making during patient admissions and communication failures between teams. Patients were at heightened risk of unsafe care during handovers and transfers of care. Metathemes included the necessity of patient self-advocacy and a lack of care coordination. CONCLUSION: This 10-year national analysis of incident reports provides recommendations to improve patient safety including: introduction of electronic prescribing and monitoring systems; forcing checklists to reduce diagnostic errors; and increased senior presence overnight and at weekends.

Postmortem Assessment of Isolated Congenital Heart Defects Remains Essential Following Termination of Pregnancy.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the correlation between prenatal ultrasound (US) and autopsy findings in pregnancies terminated due to isolated congenital heart defects (CHDs), including CHDs associated with heterotaxy syndrome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The material consists of 67 fetuses with prenatally detected isolated CHDs or CHDs associated with heterotaxy syndrome at a tertiary center in Norway between 1985 and 2014. The main CHDs were categorized into subdiagnoses of CHDs in accordance with ICD-10. The US and autopsy findings were categorized according to degree of concordance. RESULTS: Gestational age at termination was 12 + 0-22 + 6 weeks. Hypoplastic left heart syndrome was the most common main diagnosis among the 67 fetuses (32.8%). There was full agreement between US and autopsy findings in 97.4% (222/228) of all subdiagnoses. The discrepant findings in three fetuses had no influence on the decision to terminate the pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: The correlation was high between prenatal US and postmortem findings in fetuses with isolated CHDs. Meticulous assessment of cardiac anatomy is particularly necessary when the decision to terminate relies on isolated CHDs. The trend of earlier termination challenges verification of diagnoses at autopsy. Consequently, the fetus should be examined at a tertiary center with fetal medicine specialists, pediatric cardiologists and perinatal pathologists.

Characteristics of patients who had a stroke not initially identified during emergency prehospital assessment: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Around 25% of patients who had a stroke do not present with typical 'face, arm, speech' symptoms at onset, and are challenging for emergency medical services (EMS) to identify. The aim of this systematic review was to identify the characteristics of acute stroke presentations associated with inaccurate EMS identification (false negatives). METHOD: We performed a systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and PubMed from 1995 to August 2020 using key terms: stroke, EMS, paramedics, identification and assessment. Studies included: patients who had a stroke or patient records; ≥18 years; any stroke type; prehospital assessment undertaken by health professionals including paramedics or technicians; data reported on prehospital diagnostic accuracy and/or presenting symptoms. Data were extracted and study quality assessed by two researchers using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies V.2 tool. RESULTS: Of 845 studies initially identified, 21 observational studies met the inclusion criteria. Of the 6934 stroke and Transient Ischaemic Attack patients included, there were 1774 (26%) false negative patients (range from 4 (2%) to 247 (52%)). Commonly documented symptoms in false negative cases were speech problems (n=107; 13%-28%), nausea/vomiting (n=94; 8%-38%), dizziness (n=86; 23%-27%), changes in mental status (n=51; 8%-25%) and visual disturbance/impairment (n=43; 13%-28%). CONCLUSION: Speech problems and posterior circulation symptoms were the most commonly documented symptoms among stroke presentations that were not correctly identified by EMS (false negatives). However, the addition of further symptoms to stroke screening tools requires valuation of subsequent sensitivity and specificity, training needs and possible overuse of high priority resources.

Terminology for melanocytic skin lesions and the MPATH-Dx classification schema: A survey of dermatopathologists.

BACKGROUND: Diagnostic terms used in histopathology reports of cutaneous melanocytic lesions are not standardized. We describe dermatopathologists' views regarding diverse diagnostic terminology and the utility of the Melanocytic Pathology Assessment Tool and Hierarchy for Diagnosis (MPATH-Dx) for categorizing melanocytic lesions. METHODS: July 2018-2019 survey of board-certified and/or fellowship-trained dermatopathologists with experience interpreting melanocytic lesions. RESULTS: Among 160 participants, 99% reported witnessing different terminology being used for the same melanocytic lesion. Most viewed diverse terminology as confusing to primary care physicians (98%), frustrating to pathologists (83%), requiring more of their time as a consultant (64%), and providing necessary clinical information (52%). Most perceived that adoption of the MPATH-Dx would: improve communication with other pathologists and treating physicians (87%), generally be a change for the better (80%), improve patient care (79%), be acceptable to clinical colleagues (68%), save time in pathology report documentation (53%), and protect from malpractice (51%). CONCLUSIONS: Most dermatopathologists view diverse terminology as contributing to miscommunication with clinicians and patients, adversely impacting patient care. They view the MPATH-Dx as a promising tool to standardize terminology and improve communication. The MPATH-Dx may be a useful supplement to conventional pathology reports. Further revision and refinement are necessary for widespread clinical use.

Evaluation of pooled sample analysis strategy in expediting case detection in areas with emerging outbreaks of COVID-19: A pilot study.

Timely diagnosis of COVID-19 infected individuals and their prompt isolation are essential for controlling the transmission of SARS-CoV-2. Though quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (qRT-PCR) is the method of choice for COVID-19 diagnostics, the resource-intensive and time-consuming nature of the technique impairs its wide applicability in resource-constrained settings and calls for novel strategies to meet the ever-growing demand for more testing. In this context, a pooled sample testing strategy was evaluated in the setting of emerging disease outbreak in 3 central Indian districts to assess if the cost of the test and turn-around time could be reduced without compromising its diagnostic characteristics and thus lead to early containment of the outbreak. From 545 nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal samples received from the three emerging districts, a total of 109 pools were created with 5 consecutive samples in each pool. The diagnostic performance of qRT-PCR on pooled sample was compared with that of individual samples in a blinded manner. While pooling reduced the cost of diagnosis by 68% and the laboratory processing time by 66%, 5 of the 109 pools showed discordant results when compared with induvial samples. Four pools which tested negative contained 1 positive sample and 1 pool which was positive did not show any positive sample on deconvolution. Presence of a single infected sample with Ct value of 34 or higher, in a pool of 5, was likely to be missed in pooled sample analysis. At the reported point prevalence of 4.8% in this study, the negative predictive value of qRT-PCR on pooled samples was around 96% suggesting that the adoption of this strategy as an effective screening tool for COVID-19 needs to be carefully evaluated.

Factors and impact of physicians' diagnostic errors in malpractice claims in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Diagnostic errors are prevalent and associated with increased economic burden; however, little is known about their characteristics at the national level in Japan. This study aimed to investigate clinical outcomes and indemnity payment in cases of diagnostic errors using Japan's largest database of national claims. METHODS: We analyzed characteristics of diagnostic error cases closed between 1961 and 2017, accessed through the national Japanese malpractice claims database. We compared diagnostic error-related claims (DERC) with non-diagnostic error-related claims (non-DERC) in terms of indemnity, clinical outcomes, and factors underlying physicians' diagnostic errors. RESULTS: All 1,802 malpractice claims were included in the analysis. The median patient age was 33 years (interquartile range = 10-54), and 54.2% were men. Deaths were the most common outcome of claims (939/1747; 53.8%). In total, 709 (39.3%, 95% CI: 37.0%-41.6%) DERC cases were observed. The adjusted total billing amount, acceptance rate, adjusted median claims payments, and proportion of deaths were significantly higher in DERC than non-DERC cases. Departments of internal medicine and surgery were 1.42 and 1.55 times more likely, respectively, to have DERC cases than others. Claims involving the emergency room (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 5.88) and outpatient office (adjusted OR = 2.87) were more likely to be DERC than other cases. The initial diagnoses most likely to lead to diagnostic error were upper respiratory tract infection, non-bleeding digestive tract disease, and "no abnormality." CONCLUSIONS: Cases of diagnostic errors produced severe patient outcomes and were associated with high indemnity. These cases were frequently noted in general exam and emergency rooms as well as internal medicine and surgery departments and were initially considered to be common, mild diseases.

[Using Trigger Tool to detect incidents and adverse events in a mutual insurance company that collaborate with the Social Security system]. / Uso del Trigger Tool para la Detección de Incidentes y Eventos Adversos en una Mutua Colaboradora con la Seguridad Social.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate differences between the detection of incidents or adverse events (I/AE) using a Trigger Tool (TT) and voluntary notification platform (SNEA). METHODS: The study population is the working population attended on an outpatient basis in an Insurance Company ("mutua") from January to September 2016. The cases declared as Incident or Adverse Event (I / AE) were selected through the SNEA (21 cases), according to whether the event has not affected the patient or on the contrary has affected him. On the other hand, 20 clinical histories per month were randomly selected where the TT was applied(180 cases). The 201 clinical histories were reviewed looking for the existence of triggers. The agreement between the SNEA system and the TT was evaluated using proportion of positive agreement (I/EA), proportion of negative agreement (not I/EA) and Kappa index. RESULTS: TT detected I/EA cases in 41.3% of the revisions while the SNEA was 10.3% (p<0.001). The Kappa index showed a low concordance value (Kappa = 0.12), which indicates the small coincidence of I/EA detected by both systems. The proportion of negative agreement was greater than that of positive agreement (74.5% versus 26.9%). The SNEA system detected less I/ EA and above all it deals with fewer incidents. On the contrary, the TT system detected a greater number of I EA and especially EA. CONCLUSIONS: Trigger Tool is a recommended tool for the detection of incidents or adverse events that can complement the one obtained through voluntary notification platform in the reality of a "mutua".

OBJETIVO. Evaluar diferencias entre la detección de incidentes o eventos adversos (I/EA) en una mutua laboral, mediante una herramienta tipo Trigger Tool (TT) y una plataforma de notificación voluntaria (SNEA). MÉTODOS. La población de estudio es la población trabajadora atendida ambulatoriamente en una mutua laboral de Enero a Septiembre del 2016. Se seleccionaron los casos declarados como I/EA según si el evento no ha afectado al paciente o por el contrario le ha afectado, a través del SNEA (n=21 casos). Por otro lado, se seleccionaron aleatoriamente 20 historias clínicas por mes donde se aplicó la herramienta TT (180 casos). Se adaptaron 11 triggers para detectar I/EA. Se revisaron las 201 historias clínicas buscando la existencia de triggers. Se obtuvo la concordancia entre el sistema SNEA y el TT utilizando la proporción de concordancia positiva (I/EA), proporción de concordancia negativa (no I/EA) e índice Kappa. RESULTADOS. TT detectó casos de I/EA en el 41,3% de las revisiones mientras que el SNEA 10,3% (p<0,001). El índice Kappa ofreció un valor de concordancia baja (Kappa=0,12) lo que denota la pequeña coincidencia de sucesos adversos detectados por ambos sistemas. La proporción de concordancia negativa fue mayor que la de concordancia positiva (74,5% frente a un 26,9%). El sistema SNEA detectó menos I/EA y sobre todo se trata de menos incidentes. Por el contrario, el sistema TT detectó mayor número de I/EA y especialmente EA. CONCLUSIONES. Trigger Tool es una herramienta recomendable para la detección de incidentes o eventos adversos que puede complementar la obtenida mediante una plataforma de notificación voluntaria en la realidad de una Mutua laboral.

First results of a national external quality assessment scheme for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 genome sequences.

BACKGROUND: Broad and decentralised testing of SARS-CoV-2 RNA genomes is a WHO-recommended strategy to contain the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic by identifying infected cases in order to minimize onward transmission. With the need to increase the test capacities in Austria, nation-wide numerous laboratories rapidly implemented assays for molecular detection of SARS-CoV-2 based on real-time RT-PCR assays. The objective of this study was to monitor reliability of the laboratory results for SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection through an external quality assessment (EQA) scheme. METHODS: For this, the Center for Virology, Medical University of Vienna was tasked by the Federal Ministry of Social Affairs, Health, Care and Consumer Protection to perform the first Austrian EQA on SARS-CoV-2 which was organised in cooperation with the Austrian Association for Quality Assurance and Standardization of Medical and Diagnostic Tests (ÖQUASTA). Data were analysed on the basis of qualitative outcome of testing in relation to the nucleic acid (NA) extraction and detection methods used. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: A total of 52 laboratories participated, contributing results from 67 test panels comprising 42 distinct combinations of NA extraction and PCR reagents. By testing 3 positive (CT values: S1, 28.4; S2, 33.6; S3, 38.5) and 1 negative sample, no false-positive results were obtained by any of the laboratories. Otherwise, 40/67 tests (60 %) detected all positive samples correctly as positive, but 25/67 tests (37 %) did not detect the weakest positive sample (S3), and 3 % reported S2 and S3 as false-negative. Improvement in test sensitivity by focusing on NA extraction and/or PCR-based detection is recommended.

Practice, perceived barriers and motivating factors to medical-incident reporting: a cross-section survey of health care providers at Mbarara regional referral hospital, southwestern Uganda.

BACKGROUND: Medical-incident reporting (MIR) ensures patient safety and delivery of quality of care by minimizing unintentional harm among health care providers. We explored medical-incident reporting practices, perceived barriers and motivating factors among health care providers at Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital (MRRH). METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional descriptive study on 158 health provider at Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital (MRRH), Western Uganda. Data was gathered using a structured questionnaire and analyzed with SPSS. The chi-square was used to determine factors associated with MIR at MRRH. RESULTS: The results showed that there was no formal incident reporting structure. However the medical-incidences identified were: medication errors (89.9%), diagnostic errors (71.5%), surgical errors (52.5%) and preventive error (47.7%). The motivating factors of MIR were: establishment of a good communication system, instituting corrective action on the reported incidents and reinforcing health workers knowledge on MIR (p-value 0.004); presence of effective organizational systems like: written guidelines, practices of open door policy, no blame approach, and team work were significantly associated with MIR (p-value 0.000). On the other hand, perceived barriers to MIR were: lack of knowledge on incidents and their reporting, non-existence of an incident reporting team and fear of being punished (p- value 0.669). CONCLUSION: Medical Incident Reporting at MRRH was sub-optimal. Therefore setting up an incident management team and conducting routine training MIR among health care workers will increase patient safety.

Nonclinical Factors in Autism Diagnosis: Results From a National Health Care Provider Survey.

OBJECTIVE: The prevalence of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) has increased 10-fold in the past 40 years, and disparities have been noted by race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status, prompting concern about diagnostic accuracy. Provider perceptions of ASD diagnostic accuracy are not known. We conducted a survey of providers who diagnose ASD assessing how nonclinical factors might affect ASD diagnostic rates. METHODS: The mixed-mode survey was sent to the members of the Society of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics with clinical interest in ASD (n = 400). Respondents used a Likert-type scale to address how often they and their colleagues overdiagnosed or underdiagnosed ASD. They were also asked how families grouped by race/ethnicity, education, socioeconomic status, and urbanicity perceived an ASD diagnosis. RESULTS: Sixty-three percent of providers completed the survey. Eight point seven percent of providers self-reported that they overdiagnose ASD at least sometimes. However, 58% of providers reported that local colleagues overdiagnose ASD at least sometimes. Seven point eight percent of providers self-reported underdiagnosing ASD at least sometimes and cited parents not wanting a diagnosis as one of the most common reasons they may underdiagnose. Providers reported that non-white and rural families were more likely to think that ASD diagnosis was "a bad thing" than "a good thing" than white and urban and suburban families, respectively. CONCLUSION: Providers report moderate rates of ASD misdiagnosis and perceive differences in diagnostic preferences according to family characteristics. The study results may help explain the trends and disparities in ASD diagnosis.

Deontological examination as a criterion for the assessment of personal healthcare professional quality: A Strobe compliant retrospective study.

Discrepancies between clinical and autopsy diagnoses range from 30% to 37%. The significance of deontological examinations remains high. In the pursuit of proper evaluation of diagnostic discrepancies, the establishment of pathogenesis, the mechanism of death, and a correct diagnosis are of particular importance.A retrospective study of deontological examinations, aimed at the detection of medical errors and carried out by the State Forensic Medicine Service during the period 1989 to 2016, was performed. The clinical and autopsy data from 1007 cases were collected in compliance with the research protocol.The number of deontological examinations tends to increase. In 60% of cases, the deceased were men. Most cases were in the age group of 50 to 59 years. Most examinations were carried out in relation to improperly provided healthcare services and the patient's death in surgery, admission, intensive care and obstetrics-gynecology departments. In 13% of cases, the diagnosis did not coincide and, in 79% of cases, the diagnoses fully coincided. In 68% of cases, the medical error was disproved.The number of deontological examinations is increasing. In most cases, clinical and autopsy diagnoses fully matched. Incorrectly clinically diagnosed intracranial injuries were the most common diagnostic mistakes. The data are similar to the results of research in other countries and would be relevant to ensuring the prevention of medical mistakes and the improvement of healthcare quality.

Breakdowns in the initial patient-provider encounter are a frequent source of diagnostic error among ischemic stroke cases included in a large medical malpractice claims database.

Background Misdiagnosis of dangerous cerebrovascular disease is a substantial public health problem. We sought to identify and describe breakdowns in the diagnostic process among patients with ischemic stroke to facilitate future improvements in diagnostic accuracy. Methods We performed a retrospective, descriptive study of medical malpractice claims housed in the Controlled Risk Insurance Company (CRICO) Strategies Comparative Benchmarking System (CBS) database from 1/1/2006 to 1/1/2016 involving ischemic stroke patients. Baseline claimant demographics, clinical setting, primary allegation category, and outcomes were abstracted. Among cases with a primary diagnosis-related allegation, we detail presenting symptoms and diagnostic breakdowns using CRICO's proprietary taxonomy. Results A total of 478 claims met inclusion criteria; 235 (49.2%) with diagnostic error. Diagnostic errors originated in the emergency department (ED) in 46.4% (n = 109) of cases, outpatient clinic in 27.7% (n = 65), and inpatient setting in 25.1% (n = 59). Across care-settings, the most frequent process breakdown was in the initial patient-provider encounter [76.2% (n = 179 cases)]. Failure to assess, communicate, and respond to ongoing symptoms was the component of the patient-provider encounter most frequently identified as a source of misdiagnosis in the ED. Exclusively non-traditional presenting symptoms occurred in 35.7% (n = 84), mixed traditional and non-traditional symptoms in 30.6% (n = 72), and exclusively traditional in 23.8% (n = 56) of diagnostic error cases. Conclusions Among ischemic stroke patients, breakdowns in the initial patient-provider encounter were the most frequent source of diagnostic error. Targeted interventions should focus on the initial diagnostic encounter, particularly for ischemic stroke patients with atypical symptoms.

The Cost of Pre-Analytical Errors in INR Testing at a Tertiary-Care Hospital Laboratory: Potential for Significant Cost Savings.

BACKGROUND: Preanalytical errors account for most laboratory errors. Although the frequencies of preanalytical errors are well characterized in the literature, little is known regarding the costs of these errors to the laboratory. OBJECTIVE: To analyze costs associated with preanalytical errors associated with the international normalized ratio (INR) test. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of INR requests associated with preanalytical error codes from January 2009 through September 2013. Preanalytical error types were those related to order entry (no specimen collected) and those unrelated to order entry (insufficient specimen quantity or specimen-integrity concerns). We calculated the cost of analysis of a specimen and the cost of investigating errors. RESULTS: During the study period, there were 557,411 INR requests, 13.1% of which were associated with a preanalytical error code. The total annual cost of INR testing was USD $379,222.50. Investigation and reporting of preanalytical errors not related to order entry represented 10.5% of our annual INR testing budget (USD $39,939.00). CONCLUSIONS: Minimizing preanalytical errors has the potential to result in significant cost savings.

Controversies in diagnosis: contemporary debates in the diagnostic safety literature.

Since the 2015 publication of the National Academy of Medicine's (NAM) Improving Diagnosis in Health Care (Improving Diagnosis in Health Care. In: Balogh EP, Miller BT, Ball JR, editors. Improving Diagnosis in Health Care. Washington (DC): National Academies Press, 2015.), literature in diagnostic safety has grown rapidly. This update was presented at the annual international meeting of the Society to Improve Diagnosis in Medicine (SIDM). We focused our literature search on articles published between 2016 and 2018 using keywords in Pubmed and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)'s Patient Safety Network's running bibliography of diagnostic error literature (Diagnostic Errors Patient Safety Network: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; Available from: https://psnet.ahrq.gov/search?topic=Diagnostic-Errors&f_topicIDs=407). Three key topics emerged from our review of recent abstracts in diagnostic safety. First, definitions of diagnostic error and related concepts are evolving since the NAM's report. Second, medical educators are grappling with new approaches to teaching clinical reasoning and diagnosis. Finally, the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) to advance diagnostic excellence is coming to fruition. Here we present contemporary debates around these three topics in a pro/con format.

A national study of the causes, consequences and amelioration of adverse events in the use of MRI, CT, and conventional radiography in Norway.

BACKGROUND: Rapid technological developments, increased complexity, and increased demand have made patient safety a challenge in radiology. PURPOSE: To uncover the causes and consequences behind patient injury compensation claims in the use of MRI, CT, and conventional X-ray examinations, and to determine the system factors that need to be focused on in order to prevent these events. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This descriptive cross-sectional study uses data acquired from The Norwegian System of Patient Injury Compensation. A total of 240 cases from 2012-2016 were included. RESULTS: According to our study, the main factors contributing to patient injury compensation claims in radiology were false-negative findings (48.7%), misinterpretation (13.1%), and "satisfaction of search" (12%). Another source of error was routines (8.7%), mainly where the patient should have been (further) examined using another modality. Other causes were related to communication (7.6%), procedures (2.9%), technical factors (2.5%), organizational and management factors (1.5%), competence (0.7%), location of the lesion (0.7%), patient factors (0.7%), false-positive findings (0.4%), and work environment (0.4%). These events led to delayed diagnosis and/or treatment in the range of 0-3650 days. CONCLUSION: Errors of perception (false negative and "satisfaction of search") and cognitive errors (misinterpretation) were the main reasons behind patient injury compensation claims in radiology. We suggest that a combination of double-reading, specialization, increased collaboration between professionals, as well as a reduction of unnecessary examinations should be considered to reduce adverse events in radiology.

Prevalence of Masked and White-Coat Hypertension in Pre-Hypertensive and Stage 1 Hypertensive patients with the use of TeleMRPA / Prevalência de Hipertensão Mascarada e do Avental Branco em Pré-Hipertensos e Hipertensos Estágio 1 com o uso da TeleMRPA

Abstract Background: The diagnosis of arterial hypertension based on measurements of blood pressure in the office has low accuracy. Objective: To evaluate the prevalence of masked hypertension (MH) and white-coat hypertension through home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) in pre-hypertensive and stage 1 hypertensive patients. Method: Retrospective study, of which sample consisted of individuals with BP ≥ 120/80 mmHg and < 160/100 mmHg at the medical office without the use of antihypertensive medication and who underwent exams on the HBPM platform by telemedicine (TeleMRPA) between May 2017 and September 2018. The four-day MRPA protocol was used, with 24 measurements, using automated, validated, calibrated equipment with a memory function. Results: The sample consisted of 1,273 participants, of which 739 (58.1%) were women. The mean age was 52.4 ± 14.9 years, mean body mass index (BMI) 28.4 ± 5.1 kg/m2. The casual BP was higher than the HBPM in 7.6 mmHg for systolic blood pressure (SBP) and 5.2 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure (DBP), both with statistical significance (p < 0.001). There were 558 (43.8%) normotensive individuals; 291 (22.9%) with sustained hypertension; 145 (11.4%) with MH and 279 (21.9%) with white-coat hypertension (WCH), with a diagnostic error by casual BP in the total sample in 424 (33.3%) patients. In stage 1 hypertensive individuals, the prevalence of WCH was 48.9%; in prehypertensive patients, the prevalence of MH was 20.6%. Conclusion: MH and WCH have a high prevalence rate in the adult population; however, in prehypertensive or stage 1 hypertensive patients, the prevalence is higher. Out-of-office BP measurements in these subgroups should be performed whenever possible to prevent misdiagnosis.

Resumo Fundamento: O diagnóstico de hipertensão arterial baseado nas medidas do consultório tem baixa acurácia. Objetivo: Avaliar a prevalência de hipertensão mascarada (HM) e do avental branco pela monitorização residencial da pressão arterial (MRPA) em pacientes pré-hipertensos e hipertensos estágio. Método: Estudo retrospectivo com amostra constituída de indivíduos com pressão arterial (PA) na clínica ≥ 120/80 mmHg e < 160/100 mmHg sem uso de medicação anti-hipertensiva e que realizaram exames na plataforma de MRPA por telemedicina (TeleMRPA) entre maio de 2017 e setembro de 2018. Foi utilizado o protocolo MRPA de quatro dias, com 24 medidas, com equipamentos automáticos, validados, calibrados e com memória. Resultados: A amostra foi constituída de 1.273 participantes, sendo 739 (58,1%) mulheres. A idade média foi 52,4 ± 14,9 anos, índice de massa corporal (IMC) médio 28,4 ± 5,1 kg/m2. A PA casual foi maior que a MRPA em 7,6 mmHg para pressão arterial sistólica (PAS) e 5,2 mmHg para a pressão arterial diastólica (PAD), ambas com significância estatística (p < 0,001). Foram diagnosticados 558 (43,8%) normotensos; 291 (22,9%) hipertensos sustentados; 145 (11,4%) com HM e 279 (21,9%) com hipertensão do avental branco (HAB), com erro diagnóstico pela PA casual na amostra total em 424 (33,3%) pacientes. Em hipertensos estágio 1, a prevalência de HAB foi de 48,9%; nos pré-hipertensos a prevalência de HM foi de 20,6%. Conclusão: HM e HAB têm elevada prevalência na população adulta; entretanto, na população de pré-hipertensos ou hipertensos estágio 1 a prevalência é maior. Medidas da PA fora do consultório, nestes subgrupos, devem ser realizadas sempre que possível para evitar erro diagnóstico.

Assessment of Second-Opinion Strategies for Diagnoses of Cutaneous Melanocytic Lesions.

Importance: Histopathologic criteria have limited diagnostic reliability for a range of cutaneous melanocytic lesions. Objective: To evaluate the association of second-opinion strategies by general pathologists and dermatopathologists with the overall reliability of diagnosis of difficult melanocytic lesions. Design, Setting, and Participants: This diagnostic study used samples from the Melanoma Pathology Study, which comprises 240 melanocytic lesion samples selected from a dermatopathology laboratory in Bellevue, Washington, and represents the full spectrum of lesions from common nevi to invasive melanoma. Five sets of 48 samples were evaluated independently by 187 US pathologists from July 15, 2013, through May 23, 2016. Data analysis was performed from April 2016 through November 2017. Main Outcomes and Measures: Accuracy of diagnosis, defined as concordance with an expert consensus diagnosis of 3 experienced pathologists, was assessed after applying 10 different second-opinion strategies. Results: Among the 187 US pathologists examining the 24 lesion samples, 113 were general pathologists (65 men [57.5%]; mean age at survey, 53.7 years [range, 33.0-79.0 years]) and 74 were dermatopathologists (49 men [66.2%]; mean age at survey, 46.4 years [range, 33.0-77.0 years]). Among the 8976 initial case interpretations, physicians desired second opinions for 3899 (43.4%), most often for interpretation of severely dysplastic nevi. The overall misclassification rate was highest when interpretations did not include second opinions and initial reviewers were all general pathologists lacking subspecialty training (52.8%; 95% CI, 51.3%-54.3%). When considering different second opinion strategies, the misclassification of melanocytic lesions was lowest when the first, second, and third consulting reviewers were subspecialty-trained dermatopathologists and when all lesions were subject to second opinions (36.7%; 95% CI, 33.1%-40.7%). When the second opinion strategies were compared with single interpretations without second opinions, the reductions in misclassification rates for some of the strategies were statistically significant, but none of the strategies eliminated diagnostic misclassification. Melanocytic lesions in the middle of the diagnostic spectrum had the highest misclassification rates (eg, moderately or severely dysplastic nevus, Spitz nevus, melanoma in situ, and pathologic stage [p]T1a invasive melanoma). Variability of in situ and thin invasive melanoma was relatively intractable to all examined strategies. Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this study suggest that second opinions rendered by dermatopathologists improve reliability of melanocytic lesion diagnosis. However, discordance among pathologists remained high.

Do poor patients suffer from inaccurate diagnoses more than well-to-do patients? A randomized control trial.

BACKGROUND: Poor patients have greater morbidity and die up to 10 years earlier than patients who have higher socio-economic status. These findings are often attributed to differences in life-style between groups. The present study aimed at investigating the extent to which physicians contribute to the effect by providing relative poorer care, resulting in relative neglect in terms of time spent with a poor patient and more inaccurate diagnoses. METHODS: A randomised experiment with 45 internal medicine residents. Doctors diagnosed 12 written clinical vignettes that were exactly the same except for the description of the patients' socio-economic status. Each participant diagnosed four of the vignettes in a poor-patient version, four in a rich-patient version, and four in a version that did not contain socio-economic markers, in a balanced within-subjects incomplete block design. Main measurements were: diagnostic accuracy scores and time spent on diagnosis. RESULTS: Mean diagnostic accuracy scores (range 0-1) did not significantly differ among the conditions of the experiment (for poor patients: 0.48; for rich patients: 0.52; for patients without socio-economic markers: 0.54; p > 0.05). While confronted with patients not presenting with socio-economic background information, the participants spent significantly less time-to-diagnosis ((for poor patients: 168 s; for rich patients: 176 s; for patients without socio-economic markers: 151 s; p < 0.01), however due to the fact that the former vignettes were shorter. CONCLUSION: There is no reason to believe that physicians are prejudiced against poor patients and therefore treat them differently from rich patients or patients without discernible socio-economic background.

The safety of using active triage to provide advice rather than a face-to-face neurology outpatient appointment.

BACKGROUND: Neurology referrals from primary care are increasing. Actively triaging referrals is one way of providing a better patient-focussed service. METHODS: We reviewed the safety and cost-effectiveness of 'advice only' rather than face-to-face appointments for neurology patients via active triage. Referrals triaged as 'advice only' were identified over a 6-month period. Data were collected on reason for referral, opinion of triaging neurologist and whether the patient re-presented to neurology within 12 months. RESULTS: A total of 10% (236 out of 2,445) of referred patients were given advice only after active triage. A total of 71% (n = 167) had no further secondary care presentations in 12 months. The most common presentation was headache (n = 57; 13%). One patient had a major diagnostic change following delayed review. CONCLUSIONS: 'Advice only' allows patients to receive timely advice and management. It appears safe and is likely to be cost effective, although further data are required on whether it provides satisfactory outcomes for patients and general practitioners.