Perceived and physiological strains of societal participation in people with multiple sclerosis: a real-time assessment study.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between perceived and physiological strains of real-time societal participation in people with multiple sclerosis. DESIGN: Observational study. SUBJECTS/PATIENTS: 70 people with multiple sclerosis. METHODS: Perceived and physiological strain of societal participation (10 participation-at-location and 9 transport domains) were measured in real time using the Whereabouts smartphone app and Fitbit over 7 consecutive days. Longitudinal relationships between perceived (1 not strenuous to 10 most strenuous) and physiological strains (heart rate reserve) were examined using mixed-model analyses. Type of event (participation-at-location or transport) was added as covariate, with further adjustments for fatigue and walking ability. RESULTS: Median perceived strain, summarized for all societal participation domains, varied between 3 and 6 (range: 1-10), whereas physiological strain varied between 18.5% and 33.2% heart rate reserve. Perceived strain (outcome) and physiological strain were not associated (ß -0.001, 95%CI -0.008; 0.005, with a 7-day longitudinal correlation coefficient of -0.001). Transport domains were perceived as less strenuous (ß -0.80, 95%CI -0.92; -0.68). Higher fatigue levels resulted in higher perceived strain (all societal participation domains) (ß 0.05, 95%CI 0.02; 0.08). CONCLUSION: Societal participation resulted in low-to-moderate perceived and physiological strain. Perceived and physiological strain of societal participation were unrelated and should be considered different constructs in multiple sclerosis.

The quality of life impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and lockdowns for people living with multiple sclerosis (MS): evidence from the Australian MS Longitudinal Study.

PURPOSE: People living with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) in metropolitan Victoria, Australia, experienced a 112-day, COVID-19-related lockdown in mid-2020. Contemporaneously, Australian PwMS elsewhere experienced minimal restrictions, resulting in a natural experiment. This study investigated the relationships between lockdowns, COVID-19-related adversity, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). It also generated health state utilities (HSU) representative of changes in HRQoL. METHODS: Data were extracted from Australian MS Longitudinal Study surveys, which included the Assessment of Quality of Life-Eight Dimensions (AQoL-8D) instrument and a COVID-19 questionnaire. This COVID-19 questionnaire required participants to rank their COVID-19-related adversity across seven health dimensions. Ordered probits were used to identify variables contributing to adversity. Linear and logit regressions were applied to determine the impact of adversity on HRQoL, defined using AQoL-8D HSUs. Qualitative data were examined thematically. RESULTS: N = 1666 PwMS (average age 58.5; 79.8% female; consistent with the clinical presentation of MS) entered the study, with n = 367 (22.0%) exposed to the 112-day lockdown. Lockdown exposure and disability severity were strongly associated with higher adversity rankings (p < 0.01). Higher adversity rankings were associated with lower HSUs. Participants reporting major adversity, across measured health dimensions, had a mean HSU 0.161 (p < 0.01) lower than participants reporting no adversity and were more likely (OR: 2.716, p < 0.01) to report a clinically significant HSU reduction. Themes in qualitative data supported quantitative findings. CONCLUSIONS: We found that COVID-19-related adversity reduced the HRQoL of PwMS. Our HSU estimates can be used in health economic models to evaluate lockdown cost-effectiveness for people with complex and chronic (mainly neurological) diseases.

Cross-cultural validity and reliability of the comprehensive assessment of acceptance and commitment therapy processes (CompACT) in people with multiple sclerosis.

PURPOSE: The Comprehensive assessment of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (CompACT) is a 23-item questionnaire measuring psychological flexibility, a quality of life protective factor. An 18-item version was recently produced. We assessed validity and reliability of CompACT, and equivalence of paper and electronic (eCompACT) versions in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) in Italy, Germany and Spain. METHODS: We used confirmatory factor analysis and assessed CompACT-23 and CompACT-18 measurement invariance between the three language versions. We assessed construct validity (Spearman's correlations) and internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha). Test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC) and equivalence of paper and eCompACT (ICC and linear regression model for repeated measures) were assessed in subsamples of PwMS. RESULTS: A total of 725 PwMS completed the study. The three-factor structure of the CompACT-23 showed poor fit (RMSEA 0.07; CFI 0.82; SRMR 0.08), while the fit of the CompACT-18 was good (RMSEA 0.05; CFI 0.93; SRMR 0.05). Configural and partial metric invariance were confirmed, as well as partial scalar invariance (reached when five items were allowed to vary freely). The CompACT-18 showed good internal consistency (all alpha ≥ 0.78); and test-retest reliability (all ICCs ≥ 0.86). Equivalence between paper and eCompACT was excellent (all ICCs ≥ 0.86), with no mode, order, or interaction effects. CONCLUSION: Results support using the refined CompACT-18 as a three-factor measure of psychological flexibility in PwMS. Paper and eCompACT-18 versions are equivalent. CompACT-18 can be used cross-culturally, but sub-optimal scalar invariance suggests that direct comparison between the three language versions should be interpreted with caution.

Validation of the Brief International Cognitive Assessment for Multiple Sclerosis (BICAMS) in individuals with multiple sclerosis from Mexico.

BACKGROUND: Cognitive impairment is observed in 43-70 % of Multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. One of the most widely used batteries for cognitive assessment in this population is the Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS (BICAMS). The objective of this study was to validate and assess the reliability of the BICAMS in a Mexican population with MS and to obtain and provide regression-based norms. METHODS: One hundred healthy controls (HCs) and 100 patients with multiple sclerosis participated in the present study, and groups were matched for age, years of education and sex. Subjects completed all three tests of the BICAMS. Test-retest measures were obtained from 30 patients to test reliability. RESULTS: The sample´s average age was 43.39 ± 6.03 years old, and the average years of education was 12.55 ± 2.52 years. Approximately 63 % of the participants were female. The groups did not differ in age, years of education, or sex. The MS group performed significantly worse than the HCs group on all three neuropsychological tests. A significant difference was observed for the SDMT (t = 10.166; p=<0.001), CVLT-II (t = 10.949; p=<0.001), and BVMT-R (t = 2.636; p = 0.009). For all comparisons, the effect size (d) for each test was calculated as follows: SDMT= 0.58 and CVLT-II= 0.61. The test-retest coefficients for each test were as follows: SDMT: r = 0.95; CVLT-II: r = 0.84; and BVMT-R = 0.81. CONCLUSION: The BICAMS can provide information on cognitive impairment in MS patients, and this information can be used by neuropsychologists for cognitive rehabilitation in different domains.

Utility of the Brief Assessment of Cognitive Health (BACH) computerized screening tool in identifying MS-related cognitive impairment.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend that individuals with MS are screened annually for processing speed deficits, often using the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT). However, given the heterogeneity of cognitive deficits in individuals with MS, other screening measures that assess a range of cognitive domains are necessary. The current cross-sectional study aimed to examine the ability of the computerized, self-administered Brief Assessment of Cognitive Health (BACH) screening measure to detect the presence of cognitive impairment in adults with MS as determined by performance on a standard neuropsychological test battery. METHODS: Seventy-two individuals with MS completed the BACH and a comprehensive neuropsychological test battery. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were conducted to investigate the ability of the BACH to identify cognitively impaired and cognitively intact individuals. ROC analyses were also conducted to compare the ability of the SDMT to discriminate between cognitively intact and cognitively impaired groups as a comparison with the BACH. RESULTS: Cognitive impairment was observed in 56 % of the sample. The BACH showed acceptable ability to discriminate between cognitively intact and cognitively impaired groups (AUC = 0.78). Additionally, the BACH was able to adequately predict cognitive impairment in domains other than processing speed (AUC = 0.71). The SDMT also demonstrated adequate utility in identifying individuals with cognitive impairment (AUC = 0.73); however, the SDMT was not able to adequately predict cognitive impairment in domains other than processing speed (AUC = 0.56). CONCLUSION: The BACH showed adequate ability to detect cognitive impairment in individuals with MS. The BACH was able to identify impairments across various assessed cognitive domains, including individuals with and without processing speed deficits.

Premorbid cognitive functioning influences differences between self-reported cognitive difficulties and cognitive assessment in multiple sclerosis.

Cognitive difficulties are reported in up to 60% of people with MS (pwMS). There is often a discrepancy between self-reported cognitive difficulties and performance on cognitive assessments. Some of this discrepancy can be explained by depression and fatigue. Pre-MS cognitive abilities may be another important variable in explaining differences between self-reported and assessed cognitive abilities. PwMS with high estimated premorbid cognitive functioning (ePCF) may notice cognitive difficulties in daily life whilst performing within the average range on cognitive assessments. We hypothesised that, taking into account depression and fatigue, ePCF would predict (1) differences between self-reported and assessed cognitive abilities and (2) performance on cognitive assessments. We explored whether ePCF predicted (3) self-reported cognitive difficulties. Eighty-seven pwMS completed the Test of Premorbid Functioning (TOPF), the Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS (BICAMS), self-report measures of cognitive difficulty (MS Neuropsychological Questionnaire; MSNQ), fatigue (MS Fatigue Impact Scale; MFIS) and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; HADS). Results revealed that, taking into account covariates, ePCF predicted (1) differences between self-reported and assessed cognitive abilities, p < .001 (model explained 29.35% of variance), and (2) performance on cognitive assessments, p < .001 (model explained 46.00% of variance), but not (3) self-reported cognitive difficulties, p = .545 (model explained 35.10% of variance). These results provide new and unique insights into predictors of the frequently observed discrepancy between self-reported and assessed cognitive abilities for pwMS. These findings have important implications for clinical practice, including the importance of exploring premorbid factors in self-reported experience of cognitive difficulties.

Reliability and validity of the Arabic version of brief international cognitive assessment for multiple sclerosis in Egyptian pediatric multiple sclerosis patients.

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: About one-third of pediatric-onset MS (POMS) patients report cognitive impairment. This case-control study aimed to assess the reliability and validity of the Arabic version of the Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS (BICAMS) in Egyptian POMS patients. METHODS: A case-control study was conducted on 30 POMS patients aged 9 to 17 years old and 30 healthy controls. Both groups underwent the following tests: neuropsychological testing using the BICAMS-validated Arabic version battery involving the Symbol Digit Modality Test (SDMT), California Verbal Learning Test 2nd edition (CVLT-II) and revised Brief Visuospatial Retention Test (BVRT-R). Test-retest data were obtained from MS patients and controls 2 weeks following the primary evaluation. Mean variances between both groups were evaluated, controlling for age, gender, and educational level. RESULTS: MS patients scored significantly lower on the SDMT, CVLT-II, and BVMT-R tests than healthy controls (P-value <0.001). Test-retest reliability was satisfactory for SDMT, CVLT-II total, and BVRT-R in MS patients and controls with r values of 0.73, 0.83, and 0.80, respectively. CONCLUSION: BICAMS is a feasible approach to cognitive screening in POMS and adults. The Arabic version of BICAMS is a reliable and valid tool for the cognitive assessment of pediatric MS patients in different clinical and research settings.

Impact of adherence to disease modifying therapies on long-term clinical and economic outcomes in multiple sclerosis: A claims analysis of real-world data.

BACKGROUND: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic neurodegenerative inflammatory disease that requires long-term commitment to treatment for optimal outcomes. A variety of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) are now available that reduce relapses and delay disease progression in people with MS. However, adherence remains a significant issue, with a variety of mental, physical, and emotional factors contributing to non-adherence. In a large number of studies, non-adherence has been associated with worse clinical outcomes (relapses and disease severity), a higher economic burden, and loss of work productivity. However, many of these studies were short-term (1-2 years) or cross-sectional studies; thus, more data are needed on the long-term clinical and economic impacts of DMT non-adherence. The objective of this study was to determine the longer-term impact of adherence to DMTs on disease activity and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) in people with MS. The study hypothesis was that non-adherence to DMTs would be associated long-term with worse clinical outcomes and a higher economic burden. METHODS: A retrospective administrative claims analysis of the US MarketScan® Commercial database (2011-2017) in individuals (18-65 years) with MS (based on International Classification of Disease coding) was conducted. Adherence was classified by proportion of days covered (PDC) ≥0.8 and non-adherence by PDC <0.8; sensitivity analyses helped further categorize as moderately (PDC ≥0.6-<0.8) or highly (PDC <0.6) non-adherent. Cohorts were matched using propensity score matching. Time to first relapse, annualized relapse rate (ARR), time to use of assistive devices (cane/walker or wheelchair), and annual HCRU (inpatient, emergency room [ER], outpatient, and MRI visits and costs) were compared between cohorts. RESULTS: 10,248 MS cases were identified; 58% met adherence criteria, and 42% met non-adherence criteria. Mean follow-up from diagnosis or first DMT claim was 5.3 years. Adherent individuals had a longer time to first relapse (hazard ratio [HR] 0.83; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.77-0.90; p<0.0001), a lower ARR (0.13 vs. 0.18, respectively; rate ratio [RR] 0.75 [95% CI: 0.71-0.79]; p<0.0001), and longer lag times to cane/walker use (HR 0.79 [95% CI: 0.66-0.94]; p=0.0067) and wheelchair use (HR 0.68 [95% CI: 0.55-0.83]; p=0.0002) than non-adherent individuals. Adherent individuals had fewer annual inpatient and ER visits and lower total costs than those who were non-adherent (p<0.0001). Sensitivity analyses showed that differences in disease activity and HCRU were generally more pronounced between matched adherent and highly non-adherent pairs than between matched adherent and moderately non-adherent pairs. CONCLUSION: Significant differences in MS disease activity and HCRU were observed based on adherence to DMTs. Our study underscores the negative impact of non-adherence to DMTs on long-term clinical and economic outcomes in MS.

Assessment of differential item functioning of the PHQ-9, HADS-D and PROMIS-depression scales in persons with and without multiple sclerosis.

OBJECTIVE: We tested for the presence of differential item functioning (DIF) in commonly used measures of depressive symptoms, in people with multiple sclerosis (MS) versus people with a psychiatric disorder without MS. METHODS: Participants included individuals with MS, or with a lifetime history of a depressive or anxiety disorder (Dep/Anx) but no immune-mediated inflammatory disease. Participants completed the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and the Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-Depression. We assessed unidimensionality of the measures using factor analysis. We evaluated DIF using logistic regression, with and without adjustment for age, gender and body mass index (BMI). RESULTS: We included 555 participants (MS: 252, Dep/Anx: 303). Factor analysis showed that each depression symptom measure had acceptable evidence of unidimensionality. In unadjusted analyses comparing the MS versus Dep/Anx groups we identified multiple items with evidence of DIF, but few items showed DIF effects that were large enough to be clinically meaningful. We observed non-uniform DIF for one PHQ-9 item, and three HADS-D items. We also observed DIF with respect to gender (one HADS-D item), and BMI (one PHQ-9 item). For the MS versus Dep/Anx groups, we no longer observed DIF post-adjustment for age, gender and BMI. On unadjusted and adjusted analyses, we did not observe DIF for any PROMIS-D item. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that DIF exists for the PHQ-9 and HADS-D with respect to gender and BMI in clinical samples that include people with MS whereas DIF was not observed for the PROMIS-Depression scale.

Validation of an iPad version of the Brief International Cognitive Assessment for Multiple Sclerosis (BICAMS).

BACKGROUND: The Brief International Cognitive Assessment for Multiple Sclerosis (BICAMS) is the most widely used screening tool for cognitive impairment in Multiple Sclerosis (MS). However, the administration and scoring procedures of the paper version are time consuming and prone to errors. Aim of our study was to develop a tablet version of BICAMS (iBICAMS), and to assess its reliability compared to the paper version. METHODS: We administered both BICAMS and iBICAMS to 139 MS patients in two different sessions. We compared scores on both versions using a paired t-test. We used a repeated measures ANOVA to test the impact of rater, order of administration and test-retest time on test-retest performances. We used the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) to assess the reliability between BICAMS and iBICAMS. RESULTS: All three sub-tests of the BICAMS (SDMT, CVLT-II and BVMT-R) were different between the paper and the tablet versions. Order of administration influenced test-retest performances at the SDMT (p<0.001), CVLT- II (p<0.001) and BVMT-R (p<0.001). Intraclass coefficient correlation (ICC) revealed a high level of agreement between the paper BICAMS and the iPad version for all three tests: SDMT (0.92), CVLT-II (0.83) and BVMT-R (0.82). CONCLUSIONS: We found a high reliability between BICAMS and iBICAMS. Considering the inherent advantages of automated scoring, digital storage of data, standardized timing, the iBICAMS could become a standard in clinical practice.

Assessment of cognitive performance in multiple sclerosis using smartphone-based training games: a feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: Cognitive impairment occurs in up to 70% of people with MS (pwMS) and has a large impact on quality of life and working capacity. As part of the development of a smartphone-app (dreaMS) for monitoring MS disease activity and progression, we assessed the feasibility and acceptance of using cognitive games as assessment tools for cognitive domains. METHODS: We integrated ten cognitive games in the dreaMS app. Participants were asked to play these games twice a week for 5 weeks. All subjects underwent a battery of established neuropsychological tests. User feedback on acceptance was obtained via a five-point Likert-scale questionnaire. We correlated game performance measures with predetermined reference tests (Spearman's rho) and analyzed differences between pwMS and Healthy Controls (rank biserial correlation). RESULTS: We included 31 pwMS (mean age 43.4 ± 12.0 years; 68% females; median Expanded Disability Status Scale score 3.0, range 1.0-6.0) and 31 age- and sex-matched HC. All but one game showed moderate-strong correlations with their reference tests, (|rs|= 0.34-0.77). Performance improved in both groups over the 5 weeks. Average ratings for overall impression and meaningfulness were 4.6 (range 4.2-4.9) and 4.7 (range 4.5-4.8), respectively. CONCLUSION: Moderate-strong correlations with reference tests suggest that adaptive cognitive games may be used as measures of cognitive domains. The practice effects observed suggest that game-derived measures may capture change over time. All games were perceived as enjoyable and meaningful, features crucial for long-term adherence. Our results encourage further validation of adaptive cognitive games as monitoring tools for cognition in larger studies of longer duration. STUDY REGISTER: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04413032.

Relationship between subjective report and objective assessment of neurocognitive functioning in persons with multiple sclerosis.

OBJECTIVE: Persons with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) are at increased risk for cognitive dysfunction. Considering the impact and potential ramifications of cognitive dysfunction, it is important that cognition is routinely assessed in PwMS. Thus, it is also important to identify a screener that is accurate and sensitive to MS-related cognitive difficulties, which can inform decisions for more resource-intensive neuropsychological testing. However, research focused on available self-report screeners has been mixed, such as with the Multiple Sclerosis Neuropsychological Screening Questionnaire (MSNQ). This study aims to clarify the relationship between subjective and objective assessment of cognitive functioning in MS by examining domain-specific performance and intraindividual variability (IIV). METHODS: 87 PwMS (F = 65, M = 22) completed a comprehensive neuropsychological battery which included self- and informant-report measures of neurocognitive functioning. Scores were examined in relation to mean performance on five domains of cognitive functioning and two measures of IIV. RESULTS: The MSNQ-Self was inversely associated with executive function, verbal memory, and visual memory; it was not associated with IIV. The MSNQ-Informant was inversely associated with executive function and verbal memory, and positively associated with one measure of IIV. The MSNQ-Self showed a correlation of moderate effect size with depression (r = .39) while the MSNQ-Informant did not. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that the MSNQ-Self and MSNQ-Informant show similar utility. Our findings also suggest that domains of executive function and memory may be most salient, thus more reflected in subjective reports of cognitive functioning. Future work should further examine the impact of mood disturbance with cognitive performance and IIV.

Assessment of cognitive function and its predictors in patients with multiple sclerosis: a case-control study.

INTRODUCTION: Cognitive dysfunction can be seen in patients with MS (PwMS) and has been gaining attention in recent years. This study aimed to assess cognitive function and its determinants in PwMS using Addenbrooke Cognitive Assessment Battery (ACE-R). MATERIAL AND METHODS: This case-control study was conducted at an outpatient MS clinic in Istanbul. The sample consisted of 60 consecutive patients with definite MS and 60 matched controls. Cognitive function was evaluated by using the ACE-R. Subjective cognitive function, anxiety, depression, and fatigue were evaluated by validated scales. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 38.8, and the time since diagnosis was nine years. The majority of the patients had relapsing-remitting MS. Compared to age, sex, and education-matched healthy controls, all ACE-R scores, attention/orientation (p = 0.020), memory (p = 0.003), verbal fluency (p = 0.002), language (p = 0.002), visuospatial (p = 0.001), and general cognitive functioning (p < 0.001), were found to be lower in PwMS. The patients obtained the lowest scores in memory and fluency and the highest in the visuospatial domain. Age, education, mobility, subjective cognitive dysfunction, anxiety, depression, and fatigue were associated with cognitive test scores. However, only education, depression, and fatigue remained significant in the multivariable analysis. CONCLUSION: This study revealed impaired domains of cognitive functioning and its predictors in PwMS. Understanding cognitive dysfunction and its predictors in PwMS may enable healthcare providers to identify patients who might benefit from interventions to improve cognitive function. Assessment of PwMS at outpatient clinics with a practical cognitive test that does not require special competence can be suggested.

The manifestation of affective symptoms in multiple sclerosis and discussion of the currently available diagnostic assessment tools.

INTRODUCTION: In addition to physical and cognitive symptoms, patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) have an increased risk of experiencing mental health problems. METHODS: This narrative review provides an overview of the appearance and epidemiology of affective symptoms in MS such as depression, anxiety, bipolar disorder, euphoria, and pseudobulbar affect. Furthermore, the association between affective symptoms and quality of life and the currently used diagnostic instruments for assessing these symptoms are considered whereby relevant studies published between 2009 and 2021 were included in the review. RESULTS: Patients with mild and moderate disability more frequently reported severe problems with depression and anxiety than severe mobility problems. Apart from the occurrence of depression, little is known about the association of other affective symptoms such as anxiety, bipolar disorder, euphoria, and pseudobulbar affect and subsyndromal symptoms, which fail to meet the diagnostic criteria but are nevertheless a significant source of distress. Although there are a few recommendations in the research to perform routine screenings for diagnosable affective disorders, a standardized diagnostic procedure to assess subsyndromal symptoms is still lacking. As the applied measurements are diverse and show low accuracy to detect these symptoms, patients who experience affective symptoms are less likely to be identified. DISCUSSION: In addition to the consideration of definite psychiatric diagnoses, there is an unmet need for a common definition and assessment of disease-related affective symptoms in MS. Future studies should focus on the improvement and standardization of a common diagnostic procedure for subsyndromal affective symptoms in MS to enable integrated and optimal care for patients.

Stages of brain volume loss and performance in the Brief International Cognitive Assessment for Multiple Sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Cognitive dysfunction occurs in a substantial proportion of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), negatively affects their daily activities, and is associated with poor prognosis. Cognitive dysfunction in MS can extend across multiple cognitive domains, depending on the patterns and extent of the brain regions affected. Therefore, a combination of tests, including the Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS (BICAMS), that assess different aspects of cognition is recommended to capture the full picture of cognitive impairment in each patient. However, the temporal relationships between the progression of the MS brain pathology and the performances in different cognitive tests remain unclear. METHODS: Global and regional brain volume data were obtained based on T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging from 61 patients with MS, and hierarchical cluster analysis was performed using these brain volume data. Cognitive function was assessed using the three subcomponents of the BICAMS: the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT), California Verbal Learning Test Second Edition (CVLT2), and Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised (BVMTR). Clinical characteristics, patterns of regional brain volume loss, and cognitive test scores were compared among clusters. RESULTS: Cluster analysis of the global and regional brain volume data classified patients into three clusters (Clusters 1, 2, and 3) in order of decreasing global brain volume. A comparison of the clinical profiles of the patients suggested that those in Clusters 1, 2, and 3 are in the early, intermediate, and advanced stages of MS, respectively. Pair-wise analysis of regional brain volume among the three clusters suggested brain regions where volume loss starts early and continues throughout the disease course, occurs preferentially at the early phase, or evolves relatively slowly. SDMT scores differed significantly among the three clusters, with a decrease from Clusters 1 to 3. BVMTR scores also declined in this order, whereas the CVLT2 was significantly impaired only in Cluster 3. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that SDMT performance declines in conjunction with brain volume loss throughout the disease course of MS. Performance in the BVMTR also declines in line with the brain volume loss, but impairment in the CVLT2 becomes particularly apparent at the late phase of MS.

Validity and sensitivity of Canadian normative data for the minimal assessment of cognitive function in multiple sclerosis (MACFIMS) battery.

BACKGROUND: Canada is amongst the countries with the highest rates of multiple sclerosis (MS). Given cognitive deficits can occur in up to 70% of individuals with MS, there is a need for Canadian normative data that allows clinicians and researchers to evaluate cognitive impairment. Discrete and regression-based Canadian normative data for the Minimal Assessment of Cognitive Function in MS (MACFIMS) was recently published. The current study sought to evaluate the discriminant and predictive ability of these norms in a Canadian MS sample. METHODS: 188 individuals with a confirmed diagnosis of MS and 174 matched healthy controls completed all, or some, of the MACFIMS battery. RESULTS: Individuals with MS performed worse than healthy controls on most MACFIMS measures to a significant degree. Similarly, a greater frequency of impairment was also observed on each measure in the MS group. When defining global impairment as ≤ - 1.5 standard deviations below the mean on at least 2 or more tests, the MACFIMS battery identified cognitive impairment in 41.49% of the Canadian MS sample. Area under the curve analyses showed acceptable discriminatory ability for most of the measures. No difference in the sensitivity at detecting cognitive impairment was observed when comparing the discrete vs. the regression-based Canadian norms. CONCLUSION: The MACFIMS was able to detect cognitive impairment in a Canadian MS sample and can discriminate between individuals with MS and healthy controls when using Canadian norms. The validation of these norms will allow clinicians and researchers to evaluate cognitive impairment using more culturally-appropriate comparisons for Canadians living with MS.