Latent tuberculosis prevalence, diagnosis and treatment in Multiple Sclerosis as a strategy for reducing infection reactivation during immunosuppressant therapy.

BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis is an infectious disease with a risk of reactivation in Multiple Sclerosis patients on immunosuppressant therapy. Diagnosis and treatment of Latent Tuberculosis Infection (LTBI) prevents the infection. OBJECTIVE: To diagnose and treat LTBI in Multiple Sclerosis (MS). METHODS: Cross-sectional study of the prevalence and treatment of LTBI in MS, between February 2021 and June 2023. LTBI was defined as an absence of symptoms, positive PPD or IGRA and normal chest X-ray. RESULTS: Of the 58 patients with MS, 17 (29.3 %) were diagnosed with LTBI, 15 with PPD > 5 mm and 2 with positive IGRA, 10 (58.8 %) female and 7 (41.1 %) male, mean age of 41.3 (SD ±13.4) years. All patients with LTBI were treated with immunomodulators or immunosuppressants: Fingolimod 5 (29.4 %), Natalizumab 5 (29.4 %), Cladribine 2 (11.8 %), Glatiramer 2 (11.8 %), Ocrelizumab 2 (11.8 %), and Interferon beta 1 (5.9 %). Steroids therapy for relapses, were used in 5/17 (93.8 %) with LTBI and 30/37 (81.1 %) without LTBI. To treat LTBI, 11 (64.7 %) received Isoniazid and 6 (35.3 %) Isoniazid plus Rifapentine. Hepatotoxicity occurred in 3 (17.6 %) with INH. There were no interruptions of ILTB treatment during the study. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of LTBI was found to be high and treatment proved safe.

Cost avoidance from health system specialty pharmacist interventions in patients with multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Specialty pharmacists monitor patients taking multiple sclerosis (MS) disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) to evaluate response to therapy and intervene on adverse effects. These interventions have the potential to avoid health care costs by discontinuing inappropriate therapies and avoiding downstream health care utilization. OBJECTIVE: To calculate the costs avoided by specialty pharmacist interventions in MS. METHODS: A retrospective observational cohort study including patients at the Vanderbilt MS Clinic who received a specialty pharmacist intervention between February 1, 2022, and July 31, 2022, was performed. A panel of 3 investigators categorized each intervention based on the potential for cost avoidance: (1) no cost avoidance, (2) direct cost avoidance, and (3) indirect cost avoidance. A single intervention may have one or both cost avoidance types. Direct costs avoided included the cost of the potential service or medication avoided due to the intervention. Medication costs were calculated using the range of the average wholesale price and average wholesale price - 20%. For indirect costs avoided, the range of costs of a consequence (self-care, ambulatory visit, emergency department visit, hospitalization, or death) occurring had the intervention not been performed were multiplied by the range of probabilities for the consequence occurring (from zero [0] to very likely [0.5]). Self-care indirect cost savings equated to $0. Descriptive statistics summarized types of pharmacist interventions, the patients impacted, and costs avoided. In patients with an intervention that resulted in cost avoidance, chart review was performed to collect patient demographics, disease history, and MS-related health care usage during the 12 months prior to the pharmacist intervention. RESULTS: 485 pharmacist interventions in 354 individual patients were included. Fifty interventions in 38 individual patients (76% female, median age 51 years, 68% White) resulted in cost avoidance. The total estimated costs avoided in 6 months ranged from $123,733 to $156,265. In total, $138,410 were direct costs and $1,890 were indirect costs. Reasons for direct costs avoided (n = 13) were often safety monitoring (69%) or common side effects management (23%). Indirect costs avoidance (n = 37) resulted primarily from interventions on common side effects management (57%) and safety monitoring (22%). Self-care was the most common type of indirect cost avoided (n = 27). Interventions resulting in costs avoided were commonly seen in patients with relapsing-remitting MS (82%). The median time from MS diagnosis was 15 years and 42% of patients had previously trialed 1 other MS DMT. CONCLUSIONS: There is a potential for significant health care savings after specialty pharmacist interventions in MS, primarily from preventing the dispensing of inappropriate therapies.

Multi-actor system dynamics in access to disease-modifying treatments for multiple sclerosis in Southeast Asia: A regional survey and suggestions for improvement.

BACKGROUND: Despite the global availability of multiple sclerosis (MS) treatments, accessing and financing them in Southeast Asia (SEA) remains a challenge. This descriptive survey-based study aimed to describe the current state of MS treatment access and local access dynamics within this region. METHODS: The survey questionnaire, comprising of 15 closed-ended and five open-ended questions, was developed by three neurologists with expertise in MS and routine MS patient management, or had training in neuroimmunology. Questionnaire development was guided by the recent Atlas of MS and in alignment with the Access to Treatment framework, focusing on MS diagnosis and treatment issues in SEA. Fifteen neurologists experienced in managing MS across the region were identified as key informants for this study. RESULTS: All fifteen neurologists participated in the survey via email and videoconferencing between January 2020 and February 2023, which included the following countries: Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Malaysia, Myanmar, Lao PDR, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, Timor-Leste, and Vietnam. All had at least five years of experience in managing MS patients and six had previously completed a neuroimmunology fellowship programme. SEA countries showed disparities in healthcare financing, availability of neurologists, MS treatments, and investigative tools. Access to MS disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) is hindered by high cost, lack of MS specialists, and weak advocacy efforts. On-label DMTs are not listed as essential medicines regionally except for interferon beta1a and teriflunomide in Malaysia. On-label monoclonals are available only in Malaysia, Singapore, and Thailand. Generic on-label DMTs are unavailable due to lack of distributorship and expertise in using them. Off-label DMTs (azathioprine, methotrexate, and rituximab) predominate in most SEA countries. Other challenges include limited access to investigations, education, and knowledge about DMTs among general neurologists, and absence of registries and MS societies. Patient champions, communities, and MS organisations have limited influence on local governments and pharmaceutical companies. Despite its increasing prevalence, there is a lack of concerted priority setting due to MS being perceived as a rare, non-communicable disease. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the distinct dynamics, challenges, and research gaps within this region, and provides suggestions to improve MS diagnosis, education, and medicine access.

A comparison of clinical, utilization, and cost outcomes between oral treatments for multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Multiple sclerosis (MS) affects nearly 1 million people in the United States and causes significant disability and economic loss. Among the first available oral MS treatment options, clinical outcome comparisons and associated health care resource utilization are not clearly defined. OBJECTIVE: To compare MS outcomes, health care resource utilization, and relative costs across treatment with dimethyl fumarate (DMF), fingolimod (FG), or teriflunomide (TERI) among Medicare Advantage Prescription Drug (MAPD) plan and commercially insured beneficiaries. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used the Humana Research Database. Eligible study patients had their first MS medication claim for oral DMG, FG, or TERI between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2018. Patients were followed for a minimum of 12 months (mean follow-up = 3.8 years), until the earliest of the following occurred: health plan disenrollment, the end of the study period, or death. Study cohorts were balanced with inverse probability of treatment weighting. All-cause and MS-related health care resource utilization, time on therapy, and time after therapy were compared using inverse probability of treatment-adjusted multivariate generalized linear models across treatment groups. Relative costs were compared using a generalized linear model with a gamma distribution and log link. RESULTS: We identified 1,442 patients in 3 medication groups: DMF (n = 843), FG (n = 213), and TERI (n = 386). After weighting, there were no significant differences between the medication groups on demographic and clinical characteristics. Time on therapy (days) was significantly different across medication groups (P < 0.001). Time on therapy was longest for FG compared with the DM and TERI groups (644 vs 462 vs 521). The number discontinuing the index medication was significantly different for FG vs DMF vs TERI (74.7% vs 85.3% vs 80.7%; P < 0.001). FG had the lowest discontinuation rate. The mean (SD) annualized relapse rates (ARRs) were 0.47 (0.80), 0.42 (1.3), and 0.53 (1.3) (P = 0.037) for DMF, FG, and TERI, respectively. The percentage of those experiencing inpatient stays and the number of stays (mean [SD]) were significantly different among the FG group vs DMF vs TERI (29.9% vs 34.1% vs 40.9%; P < 0.001) and (0.57 [2.9] vs 0.74 [1.9] vs 0.91 [3.5]; P = 0.007), respectively. All-cause emergency department visits and the number of visits (mean [SD]) were significantly different for the FG cohort vs DMF vs TERI (46% vs 54.3% vs 61%; P < 0.001) and (1.84 [7.7] vs 2.38 [5.9] vs 2.87 [8.8]; P = 0.002), respectively. FG had the lowest impatient stays and emergency department visits of the 3 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with MS initiated on FG used fewer health care resources and experienced lower ARR compared with patients on DMF and TERI.

Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of natalizumab and fingolimod in rapidly evolving severe relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in the United Kingdom.

AIM: To evaluate the real-world comparative effectiveness and the cost-effectiveness, from a UK National Health Service perspective, of natalizumab versus fingolimod in patients with rapidly evolving severe relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RES-RRMS). METHODS: Real-world data from the MSBase Registry were obtained for patients with RES-RRMS who were previously either naive to disease-modifying therapies or had been treated with interferon-based therapies, glatiramer acetate, dimethyl fumarate, or teriflunomide (collectively known as BRACETD). Matched cohorts were selected by 3-way multinomial propensity score matching, and the annualized relapse rate (ARR) and 6-month-confirmed disability worsening (CDW6M) and improvement (CDI6M) were compared between treatment groups. Comparative effectiveness results were used in a cost-effectiveness model comparing natalizumab and fingolimod, using an established Markov structure over a lifetime horizon with health states based on the Expanded Disability Status Scale. Additional model data sources included the UK MS Survey 2015, published literature, and publicly available sources. RESULTS: In the comparative effectiveness analysis, we found a significantly lower ARR for patients starting natalizumab compared with fingolimod (rate ratio [RR] = 0.65; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.57-0.73) or BRACETD (RR = 0.46; 95% CI, 0.42-0.53). Similarly, CDI6M was higher for patients starting natalizumab compared with fingolimod (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.25; 95% CI, 1.01-1.55) and BRACETD (HR = 1.46; 95% CI, 1.16-1.85). In patients starting fingolimod, we found a lower ARR (RR = 0.72; 95% CI, 0.65-0.80) compared with starting BRACETD, but no difference in CDI6M (HR = 1.17; 95% CI, 0.91-1.50). Differences in CDW6M were not found between the treatment groups. In the base-case cost-effectiveness analysis, natalizumab dominated fingolimod (0.302 higher quality-adjusted life-years [QALYs] and £17,141 lower predicted lifetime costs). Similar cost-effectiveness results were observed across sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: This MSBase Registry analysis suggests that natalizumab improves clinical outcomes when compared with fingolimod, which translates to higher QALYs and lower costs in UK patients with RES-RRMS.

There are several medications used to treat people with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis, such as interferon-based therapies (Betaferon/Betaseron (US), Rebif, Avonex, Extavia), glatiramer acetate (Copaxone), teriflunomide (Aubagio), and dimethyl fumarate (Tecfidera), collectively named BRACETD. Other treatments for multiple sclerosis (MS) have a narrower use, such as natalizumab (Tysabri) or fingolimod (Gilenya), among others.This study objective was to assess how well natalizumab and fingolimod helped treating MS (clinical effectiveness) and subsequently estimate what the cost of these treatments is in comparison to the benefit they bring to people with rapidly evolving severe MS that use them in the United Kingdom (UK) (cost-effectiveness).We used an international disease registry (MSBase), which collects clinical data from people with MS in various centers around the world to compare the effectiveness of natalizumab, fingolimod and BRACETD treatments. We used a technique called propensity score matching to obtain results from comparable patient groups. People treated with natalizumab had better disease control, namely with fewer relapses and higher improvement on their disability level, than patients on fingolimod or BRACETD. Conversely, there were no differences between each group of people on a measure called disability worsening.Based on these clinical results, we built an economic model that simulates the lifetime costs and consequences of treating people with MS with natalizumab in comparison with fingolimod. We found that using natalizumab was less costly and was more effective compared to using fingolimod in UK patients.

Potential Medicare and Medicaid Savings on Anti-CD20 Therapy for Multiple Sclerosis.

This cross-sectional study compares price data for ocrelizumab and rituximab to estimate the savings to Medicare and Medicaid if rituximab were used in the treatment of multiple sclerosis instead of the higher-priced ocrelizumab.

Advancing Subcutaneous Dosing Regimens for Biotherapeutics: Clinical Strategies for Expedited Market Access.

In recent years, subcutaneous administration of biotherapeutics has made significant progress. The self-administration market for rheumatoid arthritis has witnessed the introduction of additional follow-on biologics, while the first subcutaneous dosing options for monoclonal antibodies have become available for multiple sclerosis. Oncology has also seen advancements with the authorization of high-volume subcutaneous formulations, facilitated by the development of high-concentration formulations and innovative delivery systems. Regulatory and Health Technology Assessment bodies increasingly consider preference data in filing dossiers, particularly in evaluating novel drug delivery methods. The adoption of a pharmacokinetic-based clinical bridging approach has become standard for transitioning from intravenous to subcutaneous administration. Non-inferiority studies with pharmacokinetics as the only primary endpoint have started deviating from traditional randomization schemes, favoring the subcutaneous route and comparing with historical intravenous data. While nonclinical and computational models made progress in predicting safety and immunogenicity for subcutaneously dosed antibodies, clinical trial evidence remains essential due to inter-individual variations and the impact of formulation parameters on anti-drug antibody formation. Ongoing technological advancements and the expanding knowledge base on pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic correlation across specialty areas are expected to further accelerate clinical development of subcutaneous biologics.

Rituximab for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in Thailand: an economic evaluation and budget impact analysis.

BACKGROUND: Multiple sclerosis is an inflammatory demyelination process in the central nervous system (CNS) causing neurological disability and poor quality of life. Currently, Thai Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved disease-modifying therapy is costly, and most patients with multiple sclerosis are ineligible for treatment in Thailand as previous studies have challenged its cost-effectiveness. Off-label use of rituximab is inexpensive and highly effective in treating multiple sclerosis, but evidence of its cost-effectiveness in Thailand is yet to be collected. METHODS: This study aimed to evaluate the cost-utility and budget impact of rituximab for multiple sclerosis treatment compared with best supportive care, the standard practice in Thailand to treat the disease. A Markov model with a one-month cycle length and lifetime horizon was applied to compare the costs and outcomes of rituximab and best supportive care based on a societal perspective. Accordingly, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were estimated. Probabilistic and one-way sensitivity analyses were conducted to investigate parameter uncertainty. In addition, the Markov model was used to assess the 5-year budget impact from the government perspective. RESULTS: A rituximab biosimilar demonstrated higher effectiveness and lower associated costs, compared to best supportive care, with the highest probability of being cost-effective (96%). The probability of relapse was the most sensitive parameter according to the one-way sensitivity analysis. The calculated budget impact of treating patients with multiple sclerosis in Thailand was 26,360,000 Thai baht (THB) or 844,255 United States dollars (USD) in the first fiscal year, and approximately 20,810,000-23,080,000 THB (666,608-739,388 USD) in the next four fiscal years. CONCLUSION: In Thailand, a rituximab biosimilar would reduce the overall costs of multiple sclerosis treatment and should, therefore, be included in the National List of Essential Medicines.

[Assessment of compliance and patient pathway among multiple sclerosis patients on disease modifying treatment]. / Compliance- és betegútvizsgálat betegségmódosító kezelés alatt álló sclerosis multiplexes betegeknél.

Background and purpose:

Epidemiological data and the number of patients treated suggest that the proportion of Hungarian patients with Multiple Sclerosis (MS) receiving disease-modifying therapy (DMT) is lower than in some neighboring countries. We investigated possible reasons for this.

First we analysed patient compliance based on an anonymised database of the National Health Insurance Fund (NHIF). A total of 5441 patients were included in the analysis from NHIF prescription data from 1 July 2014 to 28 February 2021. In the second part of the study, a quantitative and qualitative assessment of patient journeys of MS patients was conducted. 

The compliance of Hungarian MS patients is good compared to international MS treatment data and outstanding compared to other neurological and other diseases, e.g. cardiovascular. This cannot be said about the results of the patient pathway analysis based on patient interviews. Patients indicated that they often have difficulty accessing public health care. Tracing their pathways revealed that they needed to see 3-5 doctors (general practitioner, various specialists) before a diagnosis was made. However, they gave positive feedback about MS Centres. They trusted their doctors, found them empathetic, but they would have liked more time to discuss lifestyle issues.

Compared to some neighbou­ring countries, Hungary has a lower proportion of patients with treated MS, which, given the good compliance of patients, highlights the problem of patient path in Hungary. Further training of fellow physicians is also a task for neurologists specialising in MS. Just as the most common symptoms of stroke have been successfully introduced into the public consciousness, the same can be the aim for MS.

Is it cost-effective to request IgM oligoclonal bands against lipids in daily practice as a biomarker for poor prognosis in multiple sclerosis?

BACKGROUND: various prognostic factors of multiple sclerosis have been identified, including demographic, clinical, radiological, and laboratory factors. The aim was to analyze whether the presence of IgM oligoclonal bands against lipids is associated with disease progression. METHODS: an individual-based, prospective, observational study was conducted at the Neurology Department of Hospital Universitari i Politècnic la Fe. Clinical, radiological, and laboratory variables were collected. Data analysis was divided into a descriptive phase and a subsequent analytical phase. RESULTS: a total of 116 patients were included. 81.9% of them had IgM oligoclonal bands against lipids, with phosphatidylcholine being the predominant type. A higher proportion of patients with IgM oligoclonal bands against lipids required treatment with a disease-modifying drug, started treatment at an earlier stage, showed poorer results in functional tests, and exhibited a higher increase in lesion burden, although these differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, the presence of IgM oligoclonal bands against lipids was not found to be associated with other poor prognostic variables.

Patient-reported outcomes and pharmacist actions in patients with multiple sclerosis managed by health-system specialty pharmacies.

PURPOSE: This study evaluated patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and pharmacist actions for patients on disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for multiple sclerosis (MS) through health-system specialty pharmacies (HSSPs). METHODS: A multisite, prospective cohort study of patients utilizing an HSSP for DMT fulfillment was performed. Primary outcomes were affirmative answers to PRO questions regarding impacted productivity, hospitalization, and relapse and pharmacist actions. Rates of pharmacist actions were reported as the number of person-years of treatment per action. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to evaluate the association between each PRO and covariates, including the number of pharmacist actions performed, age, sex, insurance, site, and route of administration. RESULTS: The 968 patients included had 10,562 fills and 6,946 PRO assessments. The most common affirmative PRO was impacted productivity (14.6%). Pharmacists performed 3,683 actions, most commonly general medication education (42.6%) and safety (33.3%). Rates of general medication education and nonfinancial coordination of care actions were similar across medication classes; other pharmacist actions varied by medication class. Insurance type was significantly associated with reporting impacted productivity; patients with Medicare and Medicaid were 2.2 and 3.1 times more likely to have reported impacted productivity, respectively (P < 0.001) than commercially insured patients. Patients who reported impacted productivity had more pharmacist actions (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients on DMTs through an HSSP reported low rates of impacted productivity, relapse, and hospitalization due to MS, although patients with noncommercial insurance were more likely to have impacted productivity. Patients reporting impacted productivity and those taking certain DMTs may require more frequent pharmacist actions.

Oral and monoclonal antibody treatments for relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis: Effectiveness and value.

DISCLOSURES: Ms McKenna, Dr Lin, Dr Whittington, Mr Nikitin, Ms Herron-Smith, Dr Campbell, and Dr Peterson report grants from Arnold Ventures, grants from Blue Cross Blue Shield of MA, grants from California Healthcare Foundation, grants from The Commonwealth Fund, and grants from The Peterson Center on Healthcare, during the conduct of the study; other from America's Health Insurance Plans, other from Anthem, other from AbbVie, other from Alnylam, other from AstraZeneca, other from Biogen, other from Blue Shield of CA, other from CVS, other from Editas, other from Express Scripts, other from Genentech/Roche, other from GlaxoSmithKline, other from Harvard Pilgrim, other from Health Care Service Corporation, other from Kaiser Permanente, other from LEO Pharma, other from Mallinckrodt, other from Merck, other from Novartis, other from National Pharmaceutical Council, other from Premera, other from Prime Therapeutics, other from Regeneron, other from Sanofi, other from United Healthcare, other from HealthFirst, other from Pfizer, other from Boehringer-Ingelheim, other from uniQure, other from Envolve Pharmacy Solutions, other from Humana, and other from Sun Life, outside the submitted work.

Assessment of adherence to, and persistence with, an electromechanical autoinjector for subcutaneous interferon beta-1a injections for multiple sclerosis treatment over 3 years.

BACKGROUND: Self-administration of subcutaneous interferon beta-1a (sc IFN ß-1a) can be achieved with the RebiSmart® electromechanical autoinjector. This study investigated adherence to, and duration of persistence with, the newest version of the device (v1.6) among 2644 people receiving sc IFN ß-1a for multiple sclerosis (MS). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This retrospective, observational study utilized data from RebiSmart® devices, recorded on the MSdialog database, between January 2014 and November 2019. Adherence and persistence were evaluated over a 3-year period and assessed in relation to age, sex, injection type, and injection depth. RESULTS: The population of RebiSmart® users (N = 2644) comprised of 1826 (69.1%) females and mean age was 39 (range 16-83) years. Adherence to RebiSmart® use and data transfer to the MSdialog database was consistently high (mean 91.7%; range 86.8-92.6%), including across all variables (81.6-100%). Mean (±SD) persistence during the study period was 1.35 ± 1.06 years, with a maximum recorded persistence of 5.1 years. In multivariate analysis, the longest durations of persistence were observed among older individuals and males (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0078, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: People living with MS were highly adherent to use of the RebiSmart® device, with higher persistence generally observed for older and/or male individuals.

It is important for people living with multiple sclerosis (MS) to take their medication regularly ­ and to keep doing so ­ in order to control their symptoms. Some people with MS receive a medication called interferon beta-1a (Rebif®) as a subcutaneous injection (given just under the skin), and the RebiSmart® electromechanical autoinjector was designed to help them to self-inject such medication. This study aimed to find out whether people were using the RebiSmart® device as often as they should be, and how long they continued to use it for. Information was taken from the MSdialog database, which recorded peoples' use of the RebiSmart® device between January 2014 and November 2019. Records for 2644 people using the device were analyzed. Results showed that the RebiSmart® device was used most of the time (around 91.7%). On average, people kept using the device for around a year and 4 months before stopping. This duration was generally longer for men compared with women, and longer for older people than younger people. These results increase our understanding of how people are using the RebiSmart® device to treat their MS symptoms.

Disease-modifying therapies and cost-of-illness progression among people newly diagnosed with multiple sclerosis: a national register-based cohort study covering treatment initiation with interferons, glatiramer acetate or natalizumab.

OBJECTIVES: Disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) can slow disease progression in multiple sclerosis (MS). The objective of this study was to explore the cost-of-illness (COI) progression among newly diagnosed people with MS in relation to the first DMT received. DESIGN AND SETTING: A cohort study using data from nationwide registers in Sweden. PARTICIPANTS: People with MS (PwMS) in Sweden first diagnosed in 2006-2015, when aged 20-55, receiving first-line therapy with interferons (IFN), glatiramer acetate (GA) or natalizumab (NAT). They were followed up through 2016. OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcomes (in Euros, €) were: (1) secondary healthcare costs: specialised outpatient and inpatient care including out-of-pocket expenditure, DMTs including hospital-administered MS therapies, and prescribed drugs, and (2) productivity losses: sickness absence and disability pension. Descriptive statistics and Poisson regression were computed, adjusting for disability progression using the Expanded Disability Status Scale. RESULTS: 3673 newly diagnosed PwMS who were treated with IFN (N=2696), GA (N=441) or NAT (N=536) were identified. Healthcare costs were similar for the INF and GA groups, while the NAT group had higher costs (p value<0.05), owing to DMT and outpatient costs. IFN had lower productivity losses than NAT and GA (p value>0.05), driven by fewer sickness absence days. NAT had a trend towards lower disability pension costs compared with GA (p value>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Similar trends over time for healthcare costs and productivity losses were identified across the DMT subgroups. PwMS on NAT maintained their work capacity for a longer time compared with those on GA, potentially leading to lower disability pension costs over time. COI serves as an objective measure to explore the importance of DMTs in maintaining low levels of progression of MS over time.

[Therapeutic Strategies and Disease-Modifying Therapies for Multiple Sclerosis].

Multiple sclerosis is an inflammatory demyelinating disease of unknown cause that affects the central nervous system. Although it was once deemed "incurable," many disease-modifying therapies have been introduced since the beginning of the 20th century; eight of these are now available in Japan. Treatment for multiple sclerosis is undergoing a significant shift from the safety-oriented "escalation strategy," in which the patient is initially administered medications with low risks of side effects but moderate efficacy, to a "personalized approach" based on individual prognostic factors followed by an "early top-down strategy" in which higher efficacy treatments are initiated first. Disease-modifying drugs for multiple sclerosis can be high- (fingolimod, ofatumumab, natalizumab) or moderate-efficacy (interferon beta, glatiramer acetate, dimethyl fumarate), and there are also disease-modifying therapies for secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (siponimod and ofatumumab). Approximately 20,000 Japanese patients have multiple sclerosis, and this number continues to increase. Many neurologists are expected to prescribe high-efficacy drugs in the future. The risk management of adverse events, particularly progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, is required to ensure that the importance of safety never be underestimated, even though treatment efficacy is the main focus.

Clinical and economic evaluations of natalizumab, rituximab, and ocrelizumab for the management of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in Saudi Arabia.

INTRODUCTION: The advent of new disease-modifying therapies (DMTs), such as monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), resulted in significant changes in the treatment guidelines for Multiple sclerosis (MS) and improvement in the clinical outcomes. However, mAbs, such as rituximab, natalizumab, and ocrelizumab, are expensive with variable effectiveness rates. Thus, the present study aimed to compare the direct medical cost and consequences (e.g., clinical relapse, disability progression, and new MRI lesions) between rituximab and natalizumab in managing relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) in Saudi Arabia. Also, the study aimed to explore the cost and consequence of ocrelizumab in managing RRMS as a second-choice treatment. METHODS: The electronic medical records (EMRs) of patients with RRMS were retrospectively reviewed to retrieve the patients' baseline characteristics and disease progression from two tertiary care centers in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Biologic-naïve patients treated with rituximab or natalizumab or those switched to ocrelizumab and treated for at least six months were included in the study. The effectiveness rate was defined as no evidence of disease activity (NEDA-3) (i.e., absence of new T2 or T1 gadolinium (Gd) lesions as demonstrated by the Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), disability progression, and clinical relapses), while the direct medical costs were estimated based on the utilization of healthcare resources. In addition, bootstrapping with 10,000 replications and inverse probability weighting based on propensity score were conducted. RESULTS: Ninety-three patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis (natalizumab (n = 50), rituximab (n = 26), ocrelizumab (n = 17)). Most of the patients were otherwise healthy (81.72%), under 35 years of age (76.34%), females (61.29%), and on the same mAb for more than one year (83.87%). The mean effectiveness rates for natalizumab, rituximab, and ocrelizumab were 72.00%, 76.92%, and 58.83%, respectively. Natalizumab mean incremental cost compared to rituximab was $35,383 (95% CI: $25,401.09- $49,717.92), and its mean effectiveness rate was 4.92% lower than rituximab (95% CI: -30-27.5) with 59.41% confidence level that rituximab will be dominant. CONCLUSIONS: Rituximab seems to be more effective and is less costly than natalizumab in the management of RRMS. Ocrelizumab does not seem to slow the rates of disease progression among patients previously treated with natalizumab.

Evaluation of risk management in a natalizumab home infusion procedure.

Natalizumab is a well-established disease-modifying therapy used in active multiple sclerosis (MS). The most serious adverse event is progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. For safety reasons, hospital implementation is mandatory. The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has deeply affected hospital practices leading French authorities to temporarily authorize to administer the treatment at home. The safety of natalizumab home administration should be assessed to allow ongoing home infusion. The aim of the study is to describe the procedure and assess the safety in a home infusion natalizumab model. Patients presenting relapsing-remitting MS treated by natalizumab for over two years, non-exposed to John Cunningham Virus (JCV) and living in the Lille area (France) were included from July 2020 to February 2021 to receive natalizumab infusion at home every four weeks for 12 months. Teleconsultation occurrence, infusion occurrence, infusion cancelling, JCV risk management, annual MRI completion were analyzed. The number of teleconsultations allowing infusion was 365 (37 patients included in the analysis), all home infusions were preceded by a teleconsultation. Nine patients did not complete the one-year home infusion follow-up. Two teleconsultations canceled infusions. Two teleconsultations led to a hospital visit to assess a potential relapse. No severe adverse event was reported. All 28 patients who have completed the follow-up benefited from biannual hospital examination and JCV serologies and annual MRI. Our results suggested that the established home natalizumab procedure was safe using the university hospital home-care department. However, the procedure should be evaluated using home-based services outside the university hospital.

Assessment of Functional Capacity of Immune System in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis using QuantiFERON Monitor.

Background: The QuantiFERON®-Monitor (QFM) is an assay that measures interferon-γ production and was developed to provide an objective marker of complex immune response. In this study, we evaluated the use of the QFM test in patients with two forms of multiple sclerosis (MS), relapsing-remitting form treated with fingolimod (fMS) and secondarily progressive form not treated pharmacologically (pMS), and in healthy controls (HC). We hypothesized that IFN-γ levels would be lower in those subjects who are relatively more immunosuppressed and higher in those with normal or activated immune function. Methods: This single-center observational study was conducted from November 2020 to October 2021 and compared results in three groups of patients: 86 healthy controls, 96 patients with pMS, and 78 fMS. Combination of lyophilized stimulants was added to 1 ml heparinized whole blood within 8 hr of collection. Plasmatic IFN-γ was measured using the ELISA kit for the QFM and data were obtained in IU/ml. Results: The results showed that controls had nearly 2-fold higher levels of IFN-γ (QFM score) in median (q25, q75) 228.00 (112.20, 358.67) than the MS patient groups: pMS 144.80 (31.23, 302.00); fMS 130.50 (39.95, 217.07) which is statistically significant difference P-value: HC vs. pMS = 0.0071; HC vs. fMS = 0.0468. This result was also confirmed by a validation analysis to exclude impact of variable factors, such as disease duration and Expanded Disability Status Scale scores. Conclusions: Results showed that controls had higher levels of IFN-γ production than the MS patient groups and suggest that MS patients included in this study have a lower ability of immune system activation than HC. Results confirm that fingolimod is able to suppress production of IFN-γ. The fact that the QFM score of MS patients is significantly lower than that of HC may indicate a dysfunctional state of the immune system in baseline conditions.

Cost-Utility Analysis Comparing Ocrelizumab Versus Rituximab in the Treatment of Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: The Colombian Perspective.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine the cost-utility of ocrelizumab versus rituximab in patients with RRMS, from the perspective of the Colombian healthcare system. METHODOLOGY: Cost-utility study based on a Markov model, with a 50-year horizon and payer perspective. The currency was the US dollar for the year 2019, with a cost-effectiveness threshold of $5180 defined for Colombian health system. The model used annual cycles according to the health status determined by the disability scale. Direct costs were considered, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio per 1 quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained was used as the outcome measure. A discount rate of 5% was applied to costs and outcomes. Multiple one-way deterministic sensitivity analyses and 10 000 Monte Carlo simulation were conducted. RESULTS: For the treatment of patients with RRMS, ocrelizumab versus rituximab had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $73 652 for each QALY gained. After 50 years, 1 subject treated with ocrelizumab earns 4.8 QALYs >1 subject treated with rituximab, but at a higher cost of $521 759 versus $168 752, respectively. Ocrelizumab becomes a cost-effective therapy if its price is discounted > 86% or if there is a high willingness to pay. CONCLUSIONS: Ocrelizumab was not a cost-effective drug as compared with rituximab in treating patients with RRMS in Colombia.