Percutaneous Sclerotherapy of Large Venous Malformations Using Consecutive Polidocanol and Bleomycin Foam: MR Imaging Volumetric and Quality-of-Life Assessment.

PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate sclerotherapy using consecutive polidocanol and bleomycin foam (CPBF) for large untreated venous malformations (VMs) and/or those resistant to prior treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included all patients treated with CPBF for untreated VMs larger than 10 mL and/or refractory to treatment between May 2016 and October 2019. Baseline and follow-up VM volumes were measured on fat-suppressed T2-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. Outcome was evaluated on postprocedural MR imaging volumetry and by a retrospective survey assessing clinical response and adverse events. Imaging response was considered good for volume reduction from 50% to 70% and excellent for volume reduction ≥70%. Symptoms and quality-of-life (QoL) scores were compared before and after CPBF sclerotherapy. RESULTS: Forty-five patients (mean age, 16 years; range, 1-63 years; 25 males) with 57 VMs were analyzed and treated by 80 sclerotherapy. Sixty percent (27 of 45) of patients had undergone prior treatment for VM. Median VM volume was 36.7 mL (interquartile range, 84 mL) on pretherapy MR imaging. Good and excellent results after the last sclerotherapy were achieved in 36% (16 of 45) and 29% (13 of 45) of patients, respectively, corresponding to a decrease of >50% in 60% (34 of 57) of VMs. QoL score increased by at least 3 points, regardless of initial symptoms. Most patients did not desire additional sclerotherapy owing to near complete symptomatic relief, even for patients who did not achieve a good response. Swelling, pain, and motor impairment scores significantly improved after CPBF. Adverse events included fever (44%, 15 of 34) and nausea/vomiting (29%, 10 of 34). CONCLUSIONS: CPBF sclerotherapy represents an effective therapy for large and/or refractory VMs with minimal adverse events.

Retrograde sclerotherapy of male varicocele with veno-venous shunts - incidence and management: a single-centre experience.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of our study is to compare the incidence of veno-venous shunts in male varicocele and evaluate the possibility to exclude them with manual compression or/and scrotal ligation in order to carry out the procedure of retrograde sclero-embolization. METHODS: In our retrospective study, all patients undergone retrograde sclerotherapy for varicocele in our Interventional Radiology Unit in the last four years were evaluated. Collaterals toward other venous shunts were identified and how many and which patients would be able to complete the procedure safely were considered. RESULTS: Of the 91 patients, as many as 22 (i.e., 24.17%) patients presented anatomical variants, consisting on shunting into left iliac vein (9 [9.89%]), lumbar left veins (3 [3.29%]), right iliac vein (1 [1.09%]), both iliac veins (1 [1.09%]), left femoral vein (1 [1.09%]) or a more proximal portion of the ISV itself without shunting (3 [3.29%]). Patients with duplication could benefit from a more distal injection in order to prevent back-flow; of the 19 left, nine successfully underwent sclerotherapy with manual compression or/and scrotal ligation, whereas in 10 flow through the collaterals could not be interrupted and patients were demanded for surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Many patients with abnormal communications between the internal spermatic vein and the iliac veins (that is, shunts towards the iliac veins) may as well undergo retrograde sclerotherapy safely if compression/ligation is applied. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: No large previous study highlighted the impact of veno-venous shunts in technical feasibility of retrograde sclerotherapy of varicocele.

Polidocanol Sclerotherapy in Pyogenic Granulomas.

BACKGROUND: Polidocanol is a safe sclerosing agent with anesthetic properties and minimal skin toxicity. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and recurrence rates with polidocanol sclerotherapy in the treatment of pyogenic granulomas (PGs). METHODS AND METHODS: Thirty-nine patients with PG were injected with polidocanol 1% solution. Repeat injections were given weekly in case of incomplete clinical/dermoscopic resolution, until a maximum of 3 sittings. A higher strength (3%) was used for subsequent sessions in those with a minimal response to 1% solution. A final assessment for relapses was performed at 3, 6, and 12 months. RESULTS: All 39 patients achieved complete resolution (100% clearance rate), with most (n = 26) lesions resolving after the first sitting. Side effects noted were postprocedure pain (22), erythema (2), superficial ulceration (2), paresthesias (1), prominent edema (4), thrombophlebitis (1), cyanotic discoloration (1), purpuric staining around injection site (4), and mild local pruritus (1). The procedure was well tolerated across the age spectrum (4-63 years) included. CONCLUSION: We report polidocanol to be a highly effective, safe, and cost-effective sclerosant for treatment of PGs with no recurrences or need for special postprocedure care.

[Analysis on clinical efficacy, safety and economy of Shaobei injection and elastic band ligation in the treatment of grade II or III hemorrhoids].

Objective: Currently, various treatments such as hemorrhoidectomy, ligation and sclerotherapy injection can be applied in grade II or III hemorrhoids. This study aims to compare the clinical efficacy, safety and economy between Shaobei injection and elastic band ligation in treating patients with grade II or grade III hemorrhoids. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was used. Clinical data of 60 patients with grade II or grade III hemorrhoids at Department of Anorectal Surgery of the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University between January 2019 and October 2019 were collected. Patients were divided into two groups according to surgical methods. Patients in the Shaobei group received Shaobei injection (n=28), and those in the ligation group received elastic band ligation (n=32). Inclusion criteria: (1) diagnosis of grade II or III hemorrhoid; (2) application of Shaobei injection or elastic band ligation; (3) age between 18-75 years old. Exclusion criteria: (1) comorbidity with anal fissure, anal fistula, anal sinusitis or other perianal diseases; (2) patients with mental disorder or poor compliance; (3) incomplete clinical or follow-up data. Recurrent rate, postoperative pain, anal edema, anal distension, total cost of hospitalization, length of hospitalization, and postoperative life quality EQ-5D-3L score were compared between the two groups at postoperative 6-month. Results: No significant difference was observed in the baseline data (including Nystrom hemorrhoid symptom score) between the two groups (all P>0.05), except gender ratio [male proportion: Shaobei 75% (21/28) vs. ligation 37.5%(12/32), χ(2)=8.485, P=0.004]. No significant difference in recurrent rate was found between the two groups [14.3% (4/28) vs. 9.4% (3/32), χ(2)=0.035, P=0.851]. Compared to the ligation group, Shaobei group showed less pain at postoperative day 1 [VAS median (range): 2 (1-6) vs. 3 (1-7), Z=2.814, P=0.005] and postoperative day 7 [VAS median (range): 0 (0-2) vs. 1 (0-4), Z=3.149, P=0.002]; lower anal edema ratio at postoperative day 1 [10.7% (3/28) vs. 34.4% (11/32), Z=4.673, P=0.037]; lower anal distension ratio at postoperative day 1 [7.1% (2/28) vs. 28.1% (9/32), Z=4.391, P=0.048]; less hospitalization cost [(6343.5±1444.1) yuan vs. (10 587.1± 1719.0) yuan, t=12.515, P<0.001] and shorter postoperative hospital stay [median (range): 1 (1-5) days vs. 3 (1-6) days, Z=5.879, P<0.001]. The EQ-5D-3L scores of two groups were significantly improved six months after treatment [Shaobei group: (0.90±0.16) vs. (0.73±0.14); ligation group: (0.91±0.13) vs. (0.74±0.10); both P<0.001], while there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (t=0.130, P=0.897). No complications such as massive hemorrhage, infection, iatrogenic anal fistula, rectal stricture and local induration occurred after the injection. Conclusions: Shaobei injection is effective and safe in treating grade II or III hemorrhoids. Compared with elastic band ligation, it can reduce morbidity of complications and hospitalization expenses.

Ethanol Sclerotherapy versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Endometrioma Treatment: A Prospective, Multicenter, Cohort Pilot Study.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the cost-effectiveness of ultrasound (US)-guided aspiration and ethanol sclerotherapy versus laparoscopic surgery for benign-appearing ovarian endometrioma. DESIGN: Prospective, cohort pilot study. SETTING: Multiple centers, Spain. PATIENTS: Forty patients with suspected ovarian endometrioma identified by US, with a maximum diameter of 35 to 100 mm, of whom 33 met inclusion criteria. INTERVENTIONS: The study group (n = 17) underwent US-guided aspiration plus sclerotherapy with ethanol, and the control group (n = 14) underwent laparoscopic cystectomy. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Recurrence, complications, and direct costs were compared. One of 17 sclerotherapy patients recurred (5.9%) compared with 4 of 14 laparoscopic surgery patients (28.6%) (odds ratio 0.18, 0.01-1.53). No serious adverse effects (Clavien-Dindo ≥ III) were observed in the sclerotherapy group; 1 patient in the surgery group had a Clavien-Dindo IIIb complication. Median hospital direct costs were significantly lower in the sclerotherapy group than those in the surgery group-266 euros versus 2189 euros. CONCLUSION: Ethanol sclerotherapy seems to be cost-effective for endometrioma and also appears to reduce complications. In this pilot study, recurrence was not higher than with conventional surgery.

Early Stages of Chronic Venous Disease: Medical Treatment Alone or in Addition to Endovenous Treatments.

Chronic venous disease (CVD) is one of the most prevalent diseases worldwide. The health condition of most patients with early stage CVD will worsen over time, and this progression increases the burden as well as the costs of treatment and reduces patient quality of life (QoL). This highlights the importance and the likely cost-effectiveness of treatment of patients with early stage CVD. Options for managing the early stages of CVD include lifestyle changes together with venoactive drugs (VAD); VADs may be used alone or in conjunction with interventional treatment of varices such as sclerotherapy, surgery, or endovenous treatments. Micronized purified flavonoid fraction (MPFF; Daflon®) is a well-studied VAD which has anti-inflammatory activities, reduces endothelial activation and leukocyte adhesion, and increases capillary resistance and integrity, to eventually improve venous tone, CVD symptoms and QoL. This article is based on previously conducted studies and does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by the author.

Five-Year Outcomes of a Randomized Trial of Treatments for Varicose Veins.

BACKGROUND: Endovenous laser ablation and ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy are recommended alternatives to surgery for the treatment of primary varicose veins, but their long-term comparative effectiveness remains uncertain. METHODS: In a randomized, controlled trial involving 798 participants with primary varicose veins at 11 centers in the United Kingdom, we compared the outcomes of laser ablation, foam sclerotherapy, and surgery. Primary outcomes at 5 years were disease-specific quality of life and generic quality of life, as well as cost-effectiveness based on models of expected costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained that used data on participants' treatment costs and scores on the EuroQol EQ-5D questionnaire. RESULTS: Quality-of-life questionnaires were completed by 595 (75%) of the 798 trial participants. After adjustment for baseline scores and other covariates, scores on the Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (on which scores range from 0 to 100, with lower scores indicating a better quality of life) were lower among patients who underwent laser ablation or surgery than among those who underwent foam sclerotherapy (effect size [adjusted differences between groups] for laser ablation vs. foam sclerotherapy, -2.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], -4.49 to -1.22; P<0.001; and for surgery vs. foam sclerotherapy, -2.60; 95% CI, -3.99 to -1.22; P<0.001). Generic quality-of-life measures did not differ among treatment groups. At a threshold willingness-to-pay ratio of £20,000 ($28,433 in U.S. dollars) per QALY, 77.2% of the cost-effectiveness model iterations favored laser ablation. In a two-way comparison between foam sclerotherapy and surgery, 54.5% of the model iterations favored surgery. CONCLUSIONS: In a randomized trial of treatments for varicose veins, disease-specific quality of life 5 years after treatment was better after laser ablation or surgery than after foam sclerotherapy. The majority of the probabilistic cost-effectiveness model iterations favored laser ablation at a willingness-to-pay ratio of £20,000 ($28,433) per QALY. (Funded by the National Institute for Health Research; CLASS Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN51995477.).

A 1470-nm laser combined with foam sclerotherapy in day surgery: a better choice for lower limb varicose veins.

Day surgery is being more and more adopted by clinicians. Higher wavelength lasers give patients better experience than lower wavelength lasers, which makes it more suitable for day surgery. This study compares the short- and mid-term efficacy, postoperative morbidity, and patient satisfaction of "1470-nm endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) combining foam sclerotherapy in day surgery" with "810-nm EVLA with high ligation combining foam sclerotherapy in hospital surgery" on great saphenous vein (GSV) insufficiency postoperatively. A single-institution historical cohort study of 194 patients was performed in Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, China. Ninety-seven patients received 1470-nm EVLA combining foam sclerotherapy in day surgery ("1470-nm group"), and 97 patients received 810-nm EVLA with high ligation combining foam sclerotherapy in hospital surgery recommended by guidelines ("810-nm group"). No significant difference was found between the 1470-nm group and the 810-nm group in terms of GSV occlusion rate (both 100%), complication rate, and recurrence rate (8.2 vs. 11.3%) during the period of 1-12 months after surgery. Serious complications in the 1470-nm group and 810-nm group were 0 and 1.0%. Minor complications in the 1470-nm group and 810-nm group were ecchymosis at 20.6 and 18.6%, edema at 69.1 and 63.9%, and paresthesia around ankle at 0 and 3.1%, respectively. Advantage of the 1470-nm group over the 810-nm group was statistically significant considering the patient perioperative comfort and economic cost. Treatment of 1470-nm EVLA combining foam sclerotherapy in day surgery has similar efficacy as the 810-nm EVLA with high ligation combining foam sclerotherapy in hospital surgery in GSV insufficiency and is more comfortable with less incision, hospitalization procedure, and medical costs. It may be a new option for patients who are afraid or unable to be hospitalized.

Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Polidocanol Injection Versus Percutaneous Ethanol Injection for Treatment of Benign Cystic Thyroid Nodules.

OBJECTIVES: We compared the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of ultrasound-guided percutaneous polidocanol injection and percutaneous ethanol injection for the treatment of benign cystic and predominantly cystic thyroid nodules. METHODS: A total of 135 cystic thyroid nodules treated by percutaneous ethanol injection and 136 cystic thyroid nodules treated by percutaneous polidocanol injection were enrolled retrospectively in this study from May 2010 to March 2016. The nodules were followed after 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Nodule volumes, symptoms scores, and cosmetic scores were assessed before treatment and at follow-up. The therapeutic success rate, safety, and cost-effectiveness between the groups were also compared. RESULTS: No significant differences in the reduction of the nodule volume, volume reduction rate, and therapeutic success were observed between the groups with cystic and predominantly cystic thyroid nodules during follow-up (P > .05). Neither the cosmetic scores (P = .59; P = .42) nor the symptom scores (P = .32; P = .73) in the cystic and predominantly cystic nodules were significantly different between the groups at the last follow-up. The complication rates for ethanol were higher than those for polidocanol (P < .05). However, the cost of polidocanol injection was higher than that of ethanol injection for cystic thyroid nodules (mean ± SD, US$97.18 ± US$22.17 versus US$43.36 ± US$5.51; P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound-guided percutaneous polidocanol injection can be an alternative for sclerotherapy of cystic or predominantly cystic thyroid nodules. However, its cost was higher than that of percutaneous ethanol injection.

Tratamento esclerosante não estético de varizes de membros inferiores / Non-aesthetic sclerosing treatment of lower limb varicose veins

O Ministro de Estado da Saúde, Ricardo Barros, solicitou à Comissão Nacional de Incorporação de Tecnologias no SUS - CONITEC, um levantamento e avaliação dos resultados da escleroterapia não estética de varizes de membros inferiores em homens e mulheres, notadamente aquela realizada com a chamada "técnica da espuma" com vistas à incorporação de procedimento específico na Tabela do SUS. As veias varicosas são veias superficiais tortuosas alargadas com pelo menos 3 mm de diâmetro que geralmente afetam as veias safenas grandes e pequenas nos membros inferiores. Tem como causa a diminuição da elasticidade da parede da veia e o mau funcionamento das válvulas dentro da veia, resultando em acumulação de sangue e alargamento das veias. Os sintomas das varizes podem variar em gravidade, indo do desconforto ocasional à ulceração grave da pele. Também podem causar considerável incapacidade, resultando em diminuição da qualidade de vida e perda de dias de trabalho. Quando não tratadas, podem progredir para a insuficiência venosa crônica, o que aumenta a probabilidade de danos nos tecidos e desenvolvimento de úlceras de estase venosa. Os tratamentos para veias varicosas sintomáticas das pernas incluem medidas conservadoras tais como meias de compressão, elevação das pernas, caminhar e controlar o peso. Em casos com grave desconforto, ulceração ou trombose, procedimentos cirúrgicos minimamente invasivos (escleroterapia, ablação a laser endovenosa, ablação por radiofrequência) ou ligadura cirúrgica e excisão (remoção de veias) podem ser usados para destruir ou remover os vasos afetados. Neste sentido, o fluxo de sangue é automaticamente desviado para outras veias colaterais e profundas. Dos procedimentos minimamente invasivos a escleroterapia é usada para tratar os vasos sanguíneos ou malformações dos vasos sanguíneos (malformações vasculares) e também os do sistema linfático. A técnica se apresenta em três modalidades: Escleroterapia com substância líquida, Escleroterapia com espuma e Escleroterapia a laser, sendo esta ultima, em geral, utilizada em associação com a escleroterapia líquida ou espuma. O laser trata as varizes por cauterização enquanto a escleroterapia líquida ou espuma trata por inflamação do vaso e não são todos os tipos de pele que podem receber os pulsos de laser. A substância injetada causa esclerose (destruição e cicatrização) da veia selecionada. É uma técnica que necessita de repetições, mas dispensa anestesia e pode ser realizada em ambulatório, por médicos treinados, para ser efetiva. Essa técnica apresenta-se como uma possibilidade de tratamento para varizes, pois permite inativar a veia insuficiente, ocluindo-a através de uma ablação química. A escleroterapia ecoguiada é considerada uma técnica simples, segura e eficaz, com baixo índice de complicações, podendo ser realizada em ambiente ambulatorial para o tratamento de varizes de membros inferiores, com uso de anestesia local, permitindo ao paciente o retorno domiciliar imediato e a volta breve às atividades laborais. Os resultados de estudos abrangentes revelam que a escleroterapia guiada por ultrassom com espuma é um procedimento simples, seguro e eficaz para o tratamento de distúrbios venosos. Estudos comparativos observam menos complicações procedurais no grupo da escleroterapia com espuma (7%) do que na cirurgia (8%) (p<0,001). Em geral, os riscos relativos da maioria dos eventos adversos não diferiram significativamente entre a escleroterapia de espuma e a cirurgia, ou seja, ocorre uma distribuição semelhante de complicações entre as duas intervenções. As revisões sistemáticas que compararam a eficácia e segurança da escleroterapia de espuma versus escleroterapia líquida para o tratamento de varizes primárias dos membros inferiores não encontraram diferenças estatísticas significativas entre a escleroterapia líquida e a espuma para os efeitos colaterais. A análise de impacto orçamentário foi realizada a fim de estimar a quantidade de recursos necessários para a incorporação do procedimento "tratamento esclerosante não estético de varizes de membros inferiores", sob a perspectiva do Sistema Único de Saúde, com um horizonte de 3 anos, de 2017 a 2019. Os membros da CONITEC presentes na 4ª reunião extraordinária do plenário do dia 12/01/2017, deliberaram por unanimidade recomendar a incorporação do procedimento para o tratamento esclerosante não estético de varizes de membros inferiores. Foi assinado o Registro de Deliberação nº 229/2017. A Portaria Nº 4, de 31 de janeiro de 2017 - Torna Torna pública a decisão de incorporar procedimento para o tratamento esclerosante não estético de varizes de membros inferiores no âmbito do Sistema Único de Saúde - SUS.

Practice patterns of endovenous ablation therapy for the treatment of venous reflux disease.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess practice patterns of endovenous ablation therapy for the treatment of venous reflux disease among the vein specialist members of the American Venous Forum (AVF). METHODS: An online survey was conducted of AVF members designed to identify demographics, treatment practices, and clinical variables in the selection of vein ablation devices. RESULTS: The survey was distributed to 798 practicing physicians, of whom 129 (16%) responded. The specialty distribution of respondents was as follows: vascular surgeons, 54%; phlebologists, 14%; general surgeons, 11%; interventional radiologists, 9%; and other specialties, 6%. The majority (81%) were from the United States, and 65% were self-employed. Almost half (47%) were in practice for >20 years, with 33% of all respondents performing three to five saphenous vein ablations per week. Three-quarters (79%) of respondents preferred radiofrequency ablation (RFA), with 47% believing that it was more cost-effective and more than half (57%) reporting improved patient satisfaction with this technique. Most of them (63%) responded that previous capital investment played a significant role in their choice of vein ablation device along with the associated cost of disposable equipment. A large majority (77%) of physicians responded that they had a significant role in choosing the treatment device, whereas only 17% thought that patients' choice played a major role in device choice. The capital investment affected choice of modality more significantly in newer practices (P < .0.5). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of AVF vein specialists prefer an RFA technique to laser, believing that RFA is associated with improved patient outcomes and is more cost-effective. Advances in technology, device costs, and reimbursement levels may have an impact on such preferences in the future.

Prospective Randomized Study of Ultrasound-Guided Foam Sclerotherapy Combined with Great Saphenous Vein High Ligation in the Treatment of Severe Lower Extremity Varicosis.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the effect of ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy (UGFS) in a single session combined with great saphenous vein (GSV) high ligation for severe lower extremity varicosis classified as C4-C6, compared with GSV stripping plus multistab avulsion or transilluminated powered phlebectomy (TIPP). METHODS: From January 2012 to December 2014, 177 patients with primary GSV insufficiency, classified as C4-C6, were randomized into the UGFS group or the control group. The UGFS group was managed by GSV high ligation and foam sclerotherapy in one session under the surveillance of ultrasonography, whereas the control group received GSV high ligation and stripping combined with multistab avulsion or TIPP. The patients were followed up at 1, 6, and 12 months after treatment. Outcome assessments included reflux recurrence rate, procedure-related adverse events, hemodynamic parameters, revised Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS), and Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ) score. The medical cost and operating time of the 2 groups were also compared. RESULTS: In total, 73 patients received UGFS, whereas 90 patients underwent traditional surgery. Sixty-five patients in the UGFS group (89.0%) and 74 patients in the control group (82.2%) completed the follow-up. At the end of 12 months, the cumulative reflux recurrence rate was 13.8% in the UGFS group and 13.5% in the control group (P = 0.955). In the UGFS and control groups, minor complications (27.7% vs. 21.6%, P = 0.406) and major complications (3.1% vs. 2.7%, P = 0.895) were not significantly different. Compared with baseline values, obvious improvements of the venous filling index, VCSS, and AVVQ scores after treatment were confirmed in both groups (P < 0.001). The average operating and recovery times were much shorter (38.3 vs. 81.2 min, 5.4 vs. 9.6 days, P < 0.001, respectively), and the average hospital cost was much lower ($853 vs. $1,575, P < 0.001) in the UGFS group than in the control group. The patient satisfaction rate reached 92.3% in the UGFS group and 89.2% in the control group 12 months after operation (P = 0.270). CONCLUSIONS: Our outcomes indicated that UGFS combined with GSV high ligation was safe and effective for severe lower extremity varicosis.

Esclerosis venosa eco-asistida con espuma para la insuficiencia venosa crónica / Ultrasound-guided sclerotherapy with foam in chronic vein insufficiency

CONTEXTO CLÍNICO: La insuficiencia venosa crónica de miembros inferiores se manifiesta a través de varices que son dilataciones permanentes de las venas superficiales de los miembros inferiores. Afectan ambos miembros, suelen aparecer antes de los 30 años y tienen un predominio marcado en el sexo femenino. Se calcula que el 44% de las mujeres y el 32% de los varones presentan algún grado de insuficiencia venosa crónica. Entre un 10 a 15 % evolucionan a formas sintomáticas con dolor, picazón, alteraciones cutáneas, flebitis y ulceras. La insuficiencia venosa crónica se clasifica según la etiología en varices primarias o esenciales (no existe una alteración del sistema venoso profundo) y varices secundarias, como las que siguen a una trombosis venosa profunda. Según a su morfología se clasifican en varices tronculares, reticulares, de venas perforantes y telangectasias.Las formas leves pueden ser tratadas con medidas de contención (posturales, lubricación, medias compresivas, etc.) y tratamiento farmacológico, mientras que las formas sintomáticas moderadas a graves pueden ser tratadas con diferentes técnicas de escleroterapia que utilizan distintos tipos de sustancias esclerosantes (hiperosmóticas, corrosivas y detergentes) y cuando son formas muy severas está indicada la resección o ligadura radical quirúrgica del paquete venoso comprometido. Otras técnicas usadas son la crio-esclerosis, eco-esclerosis, laser-esclerosis, radiofrecuencia. La escleroterapia es una técnica simple de tratamiento que se usa para el manejo de venas de pequeño o moderado tamaño, no siendo eficaz en vasos de mayores a 9 mm de diámetro debido a que los esclerosantes líquidos no cumplen los requerimientos básicos de la técnica. Se postula el uso del tratamiento del síndrome varicoso con Eco-doppler con espuma para venas varicosas esenciales de cualquier tipo y tamaño (desde las arañas vasculares, venas capilares subcutáneas hasta las varices de gran volumen). TECNOLOGÍA: La escleroterapia es una técnica percutánea mínimamente invasiva cuyo objetivo es cerrar las venas varicosas utilizando irritantes químicos. El uso de agentes esclerosantes con espuma provoca la desorganización de la membrana fosfolipídica de las células endoteliales con un poder esclerosante mayor. Los tipos de sustancia que se pueden usar son: polidocanol (hidroxipolietoxidodecano), tetradedilsulfato de sodio, cloruro de lapidio. OBJETIVO: Evaluar la evidencia disponible acerca de la eficacia, seguridad y aspectos relacionados a las políticas de cobertura de la Esclerosis venosa eco-asistida con espuma para la insuficiencia venosa crónica. MÉTODOS: Se realizó una búsqueda en las principales bases de datos bibliográficas (incluyendo Medline, Cochrane y CRD), en buscadores genéricos de Internet, agencias de evaluación de tecnologías sanitarias y financiadores de salud utilizando la siguiente estrategia: ((Sclerotherapy[MeSH] OR Sclerotherap*[tiab]) AND (Polidocanol[Supplementary Concept] OR Polidocanol[tiab] OR Varithena[tiab] OR Laureth[tiab] OR Lubrol[tiab])) AND (Venous Insufficiency[MeSH] OR Venous Insufficien*[tiab] OR Varicose Veins[Mesh] OR Varicose[tiab] OR Varix[tiab] OR Varices[tiab]) AND (ultrasound-guided[All Fields] AND foam[All Fields] AND elds])) Se priorizó la inclusión de revisiones sistemáticas (RS), ensayos clínicos controlados aleatorizados (ECAs), evaluaciones de tecnologías sanitarias y económicas, guías de práctica clínica(GPC) y políticas de cobertura de otros sistemas de salud cuando estaban disponibles. RESULTADOS: Para el informe se incluyeron dos RS, un ECA, una evaluación de tecnología, tres GPC y seis políticas de cobertura. CONCLUSIONES: Evidencia de moderada calidad sugiere que la esclerosis venosa eco-asistida con espuma no demostró mayor efectividad que otros tratamientos como ablación con radiofrecuencia, láser o cirugía para la insuficiencia venosa crónica. Las distintas guías de práctica clínica recomiendan esta tecnología como una opción terapéutica para síndromes varicosos sintomáticos venas safenas incompetentes, venas varicosas reticulares, telangiectasias y venas varicosas residuales a otros tratamientos. Algunos financiadores estadounidenses y británicos dan cobertura a esta tecnología sólo para síndrome varicoso de venas safenas grandes, pequeñas y accesorias sintomáticas de más de 2,5 mm con presencia de insuficiencia venosa documentada por eco-doppler. Otros financiadores lo consideran un tratamiento cosmético o en fase experimental.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Percutaneous Sclerotherapy for Venous Malformations.

PURPOSE: To assess cost-effectiveness of sclerotherapy for venous malformations (VMs) to improve patient quality of life (QOL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study enrolled 28 patients with symptomatic VMs who underwent sclerotherapy. EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) and Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey were used to measure health-related QOL. Questionnaires were collected before and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after sclerotherapy. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were calculated using EQ-5D score as a measure of health utility. Medical costs obtained from the hospital accounting system and other costs of staff, drugs, materials, and angiographic equipment were calculated for each procedure. Cost-effectiveness was analyzed using incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) as the medical cost/gain of QALYs. RESULTS: Median EQ-5D scores improved from 0.768 (range, 0.705-1) to 1 (range, 0.768-1) after 6 months (P = .023) and 1 (range, 0.768-1) after 12 months (P = .063). The gain of QALYs at 12 months was 0.043. The mean medical cost was ¥281,228 ($2,337). The pain group (baseline bodily pain scale of SF-36 score < 70) showed greater improvement in median EQ-5D score, from 0.705 (range, 0.661-0.768) to 0.768 (range, 0.705-1) after 6 months (P = .041) and 0.768 (range, 0.768-1) after 12 months (P = .049). ICER at 12 months was ¥6,600,483 ($54,840) in the overall group and decreased to ¥3,998,113 ($33,218) in the pain group, < ¥6,000,000 ($49,850), threshold for acceptance of a public health benefit in Japan, even accounting for 50% increase in costs. CONCLUSIONS: Sclerotherapy was cost-effective for improving QOL for symptomatic VMs, especially for patients with moderate to severe pain.

What is effective care for varicose veins?

Varicose veins affect one-quarter to one-third of Western adult populations and consume an increasing amount of health care resources. Much of this increased utilization has been driven by the advent of minimally invasive technology including endovenous thermal ablation, foam sclerotherapy, and more recently mechanicochemical and cyanoacrylate glue ablation. This has largely been driven by patient and physician preferences in the absence of robust evidence that one therapy is truly superior to another. This partially arises from misunderstandings about appropriate outcomes measures and what truly constitutes effective treatment of varicose veins. Technical outcomes, such as saphenous closure rates, have frequently been used as surrogates for effective treatment but are poorly correlated with symptom improvement, quality of life, and risk of recurrence. Although there does appear to be a trend towards higher recurrence with ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy, the data are occasionally conflicting and there does not appear to be substantial differences between the various modalities. Similarly, there do not appear to be major differences in late quality of life measures between these treatment options. As long-term differences in recurrence and quality of life are small, overall cost effectiveness is driven primarily by initial treatment costs and ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy is the most cost-effective strategy in many models. However, there continues to be substantial uncertainty surrounding cost estimates and other factors of importance to the patient may ultimately drive treatment decisions. The benefits of some adjuncts to the treatment of axial superficial reflux, such as the concurrent versus staged management of tributary varicosities, remain ill-defined while that of others, such as routine post-procedural ultrasound surveillance and compression, need critical re-evaluation.

Radiofrequency ablation: an assessment of clinical and cost efficacy.

BACKGROUND: Varicose veins are common and frequently cause patient distress. In recent years, Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative to traditional open venous ligation surgery. AIMS: The aim of this study was to directly compare RFA and open saphenofemoral ligation. METHODS: This was a single-centre retrospective cohort study. Consecutive patients undergoing surgical management over a 2-year period commencing from January 2011 were studied. Radiological success, peri-operative serological testing and hospital length of stay were documented. Procedural cost was calculated. A focused cohort analysis was undertaken to compare the initial 50 RFA procedures performed with the last 50. RESULTS: During the study period, 296 patients underwent surgical intervention. A total of 204 patients underwent RFA. Sixty-six percent of all patients were female. RFA was associated with a reduction in overnight hospital stay (18 vs. 78 %, P = <0.001) when compared with open ligation with a success rate of 98 %. No significant inter-group difference was noted for 30-day readmission (p = 0.203). Focused cohort analysis identified an increase in hospital day case activity (74 vs. 90 %, p = 0.002), which contributed to a reduction in procedural cost (€1,024 vs. €971, p = 0.003) over the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Radiofrequency ablation is a viable alternative to open repair offering excellent efficacy. It is however associated with a higher procedural cost than the open surgical option.

Superficial venous incompetence: low-cost outpatient minisurgery, sclerotherapy and combined procedure as a management plan. Costs and efficacy. A 20-year, follow-up registry.

BACKGROUND: This registry study evaluated low-cost outpatient surgery (mini-S) for venous insufficiency as an alternative to stripping. METHODS: This 20-year follow-up is focused on the recurrence of varices and on the long-term efficacy of the mini-S (group 1) in comparison with controls (2, stripping), sclerotherapy (3) or a combination of mini-S+sclerotherapy (4). Costs were compared. RESULTS: At 20-years of follow-up, considering recurrence/development of new varicose veins, 24.05% of the limbs treated with mini-S developed new varices in comparison with 64.4% in group 2, 24.1% in group 3 and 15.4% in group 4 (P<0.05). New surgical procedures were needed in 18.9% of mini-S patients vs. 58.5% in group 2, 21.9% in group 3 and 19.7% in group 4 (P<0.05 between group 2 and the other groups). Sclerotherapy (in the years following the initial treatment) was used in 37.9% of mini-S patients in comparison with 67.7% of subjects in group 2 patients, 33.1% in group 3 and 22.8% in group 4 (P<0.05 between outpatient treatment and group 2). The superficial venous system was incompetent in 21% of mini-S patients in comparison with 38.8% in group 2 (P<0.05), 20.7% in group 3 and 17.9% of group 4. At 20 years edema was present in 10.5% of limbs in group 2 in comparison with a <3% (range 2.2-2.1%) in the other groups. Edema was more significant after stripping. Ambulatory venous pressure measurements in subgroups was lower in groups 1, 3 and 4 with a lower refilling time (P<0.05). The cost of in-hospital, daily surgical treatments were €1978 (covered by the heathcare provider). The cost of mini-S was on average €488 per limb (covered by patients). CONCLUSIONS: Outpatients procedures, in particular the mini-S management plan, were cheaper than stripping and more effective at 20-years follow-up. They could be a model for emerging contries with restricted budgets for vein surgery. Also being cheaper more people may have benefits from treatment when/where hospital procedures are not covered by an healthcare provider.

Cost-utility analysis of great saphenous vein ablation with radiofrequency, foam and surgery in the emerging health-care setting of Thailand.

OBJECTIVES: To conduct economic evaluations of radiofrequency ablation, ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy and surgery for great saphenous vein ablation. METHOD: A cost-utility and cohort analysis from societal perspective was performed to estimate incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. Transitional probabilities were from meta-analysis. Direct medical, direct non-medical, indirect costs, and utility were from standard Thai costings and cohort. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed to assess parameter uncertainties. RESULTS: Seventy-seven patients (31 radiofrequency ablation, 19 ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy, and 27 surgeries) were enrolled from October 2011 to February 2013. Compared with surgery, radiofrequency ablation costed 12,935 and 20,872 Baht higher, whereas ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy costed 6159 lower and 1558 Bath higher for outpatient and inpatient, respectively. At one year, radiofrequency ablation had slightly lower quality-adjusted life-year, whereas ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy yielded additional 0.025 quality-adjusted life-year gained. Because of costing lower and greater quality-adjusted life-year than other compared alternatives, outpatient ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy was an option being dominant. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis resulted that at the Thai ceiling threshold of 160,000 Baht/quality-adjusted life-year gained, ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy had chances of 0.71 to be cost-effective. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy seems to be cost-effective for treating great saphenous vein reflux compared to surgery in Thailand at one-year results.