Association of hospital volume and operative approach with clinical and financial outcomes of elective esophagectomy in the United States.

INTRODUCTION: Literature regarding the impact of esophagectomy approach on hospitalizations costs and short-term outcomes is limited. Moreover, few have examined how institutional MIS experience affects costs. We thus examined utilization trends, costs, and short-term outcomes of open and minimally invasive (MIS) esophagectomy as well as assessing the relationship between institutional MIS volume and hospitalization costs. METHODS: All adults undergoing elective esophagectomy were identified from the 2016-2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Multiple regression models were used to assess approach with costs, in-hospital mortality, and major complications. Additionally, annual hospital MIS esophagectomy volume was modeled as a restricted cubic spline against costs. Institutions performing > 16 cases/year corresponding with the inflection point were categorized as high-volume hospitals (HVH). We subsequently examined the association of HVH status with costs, in-hospital mortality, and major complications in patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy. RESULTS: Of an estimated 29,116 patients meeting inclusion, 10,876 (37.4%) underwent MIS esophagectomy. MIS approaches were associated with $10,600 in increased incremental costs (95% CI 8,800-12,500), but lower odds of in-hospital mortality (AOR 0.76; 95% CI 0.61-0.96) or major complications (AOR 0.68; 95% CI 0.60, 0.77). Moreover, HVH status was associated with decreased adjusted costs, as well as lower odds of postoperative complications for patients undergoing MIS operations. CONCLUSION: In this nationwide study, MIS esophagectomy was associated with increased hospitalization costs, but improved short-term outcomes. In MIS operations, cost differences were mitigated by volume, as HVH status was linked with decreased costs in the setting of decreased odds of complications. Centralization of care to HVH centers should be considered as MIS approaches are increasingly utilized.

Nutritional responsiveness affects novel neutrophil parameters and reduces in-hospital mortality and costs in elective cancer oesophagectomy - a single centre, prospective, observational study.

INTRODUCTION: Malnutrition in surgical patients remains a common issue affecting the perioperative period. Oesophageal cancer is a disease associated with one of the highest malnutrition rates. Assessment of patient nutritional status remains a challenge due to limited validated tools. Novel parameters to identify malnourished patients and the effectiveness of preoperative nutritional intervention might improve treatment results in the perioperative period. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a prospective, observational, single-centre study of patients scheduled for elective oesophagectomy. The primary aim of this study was to establish the correlation between neutrophil reactivity intensity (NEUT-RI) and neutrophil granularity intensity (NEUT-GI) and patients' nutritional status. We divided patients into nutritional responders (R group) and nutritional non-responders (NR group) defined as regaining at least 25% of the maximum preoperative body weight loss during the preoperative period. RESULTS: The R group had significantly shorter intensive care unit (ICU) stays: 5.5 (4-8) vs. 13 (7-31) days ( P = 0.01). It resulted in a lower cost of ICU stays in the R group: 4775.2 (3938.9-7640.7) vs. 12255.8 (7787.6-49108.7) euro in the NR group ( P = 0.01). Between the R group and the NR group, we observed statistically significant differences in both preoperative NEUT-RI (48.6 vs. 53.4, P = 0.03) and NEUT-GI (154.6 vs. 159.3, P = 0.02). Apart from the T grade, the only preoperative factor associated with reduced mortality was the nutritional responsiveness: 11.1% vs. 71.4% ( P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative nutritional responsiveness affects neutrophil intensity indexes and reduces in-hospital mortality and costs associated with hospital stay. Further research is required to determine the correlation between novel neutrophil parameters and patients' nutritional status.

Quantification of fluorescence angiography for visceral perfusion assessment: measuring agreement between two software algorithms.

BACKGROUND: Indocyanine green fluorescence angiography (ICG-FA) may reduce perfusion-related complications of gastrointestinal anastomosis. Software implementations for quantifying ICG-FA are emerging to overcome a subjective interpretation of the technology. Comparison between quantification algorithms is needed to judge its external validity. This study aimed to measure the agreement for visceral perfusion assessment between two independently developed quantification software implementations. METHODS: This retrospective cohort analysis included standardized ICG-FA video recordings of patients who underwent esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction between August 2020 until February 2022. Recordings were analyzed by two quantification software implementations: AMS and CPH. The quantitative parameter used to measure visceral perfusion was the normalized maximum slope derived from fluorescence time curves. The agreement between AMS and CPH was evaluated in a Bland-Altman analysis. The relation between the intraoperative measurement of perfusion and the incidence of anastomotic leakage was determined for both software implementations. RESULTS: Seventy pre-anastomosis ICG-FA recordings were included in the study. The Bland-Altman analysis indicated a mean relative difference of + 58.2% in the measurement of the normalized maximum slope when comparing the AMS software to CPH. The agreement between AMS and CPH deteriorated as the magnitude of the measured values increased, revealing a proportional (linear) bias (R2 = 0.512, p < 0.001). Neither the AMS nor the CPH measurements of the normalized maximum slope held a significant relationship with the occurrence of anastomotic leakage (median of 0.081 versus 0.074, p = 0.32 and 0.041 vs 0.042, p = 0.51, respectively). CONCLUSION: This is the first study to demonstrate technical differences in software implementations that can lead to discrepancies in ICG-FA quantification in human clinical cases. The possible variation among software-based quantification methods should be considered when interpreting studies that report quantitative ICG-FA parameters and derived thresholds, as there may be a limited external validity.

National clinical and financial outcomes associated with acute kidney injury following esophagectomy for cancer.

BACKGROUND: Esophagectomy is a complex oncologic operation associated with high rates of postoperative complications. While respiratory and septic complications have been well-defined, the implications of acute kidney injury (AKI) remain unclear. Using a nationally representative database, we aimed to characterize the association of AKI with mortality, resource use, and 30-day readmission. METHODS: All adults undergoing elective esophagectomy with a diagnosis of esophageal or gastric cancer were identified in the 2010-2019 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Study cohorts were stratified based on presence of AKI. Multivariable regressions and Royston-Parmar survival analysis were used to evaluate the independent association between AKI and outcomes of interest. RESULTS: Of an estimated 40,438 patients, 3,210 (7.9%) developed AKI. Over the 10-year study period, the incidence of AKI increased from 6.4% to 9.7%. Prior radiation/chemotherapy and minimally invasive operations were associated with reduced odds of AKI, whereas public insurance coverage and concurrent infectious and respiratory complications had greater risk of AKI. After risk adjustment, AKI remained independently associated with greater odds of in-hospital mortality (AOR: 4.59, 95% CI: 3.62-5.83) and had significantly increased attributable costs ($112,000 vs $54,000) and length of stay (25.7 vs 13.3 days) compared to patients without AKI. Furthermore, AKI demonstrated significantly increased hazard of 30-day readmission (hazard ratio: 1.16, 95% CI: 1.01-1.32). CONCLUSIONS: AKI after esophagectomy is associated with greater risk of mortality, hospitalization costs, and 30-day readmission. Given the significant adverse consequences of AKI, careful perioperative management to mitigate this complication may improve quality of esophageal surgical care at the national level.

Development and validation of the Convalescence Symptom Assessment Scale for EsophageCtomy patients.

AIM: A specific, valid and reliable measure is much needed to dynamically assess the recovery of symptoms in oesophagectomy patients. This study describes developing and validating the Convalescent Symptom Assessment Scale for oesophagectomy patients (CSAS_EC). DESIGN: An instrument development and cross-sectional validation study was conducted. METHODS: This study consists of two components: instrument development and psychometric tests. In instrument development, the literature review, qualitative interviews, Delphi method expert consultation and face validation were used to develop and refine scale content. In psychometric tests, the clinical test version scale was used to conduct a cross-sectional in the thoracic surgery department from 17 June to 20 November 2022. The Classical Test Theory and Multidimensional Item Response Theory (MIRT) analyses examined psychometric properties. RESULTS: In instrument development, literature review (n = 20), qualitative interviews (n = 21), expert consultation (n = 12) and pre-survey (n = 15) led to the development of the clinical test version scale. In psychometric tests, a total of 331 participants were enrolled. Confirmatory factor analysis and MIRT analysis verified that a model with 28 items in four dimensions was good. The four dimensions were early recovery symptoms, late recovery symptoms, persistent present symptoms and psychosocial symptoms. The Cronbach's α is 0.827. The validity and reliability were demonstrated to be acceptable. CONCLUSIONS: The CSAS_EC scale can be used as a tool to evaluate the recovery status of oesophagectomy patients.

Impact of pulmonary complications following esophagectomy on long-term survival: multivariate meta-analysis and restricted mean survival time assessment.

Pulmonary complications (PC) are common after esophagectomy and their impact on long-term survival is not defined yet. The present study aimed to assess the effect of postoperative PCs on long-term survival after esophagectomy for cancer. Systematic review of the literature through February 1, 2023, was performed. The included studies evaluated the effect of PC on long-term survival. Primary outcome was long-term overall survival (OS). Cancer-specific survival (CSS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were secondary outcomes. Restricted mean survival time difference (RMSTD), hazard ratio (HR), and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used as pooled effect size measures. Eleven studies were included (3423 patients). Overall, 674 (19.7%) patients developed PC. The RMSTD analysis shows that at 60-month follow-up, patients not experiencing PC live an average of 8.5 (95% CI 6.2-10.8; p < 0.001) months longer compared with those with PC. Similarly, patients not experiencing postoperative PC seem to have significantly longer CSS (8 months; 95% CI 3.7-12.3; p < 0.001) and DFS (5.4 months; 95% CI 1.6-9.1; p = 0.005). The time-dependent HRs analysis shows a reduced mortality hazard in patients without PC at 12 (HR 0.6, 95% CI 0.51-0.69), 24 (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.55-0.73), 36 (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.55-0.79), and 60 months (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.51-0.89). This study suggests a moderate clinical impact of PC on long-term OS, CSS, and DFS after esophagectomy. Patients not experiencing PC seem to have a significantly reduced mortality hazard up to 5 years of follow-up.

Cost comparison between medicare and private insurance for robotic transhiatal esophagectomy.

Esophageal cancer is a significant health concern, with the robotic platform being increasingly adopted for transhiatal esophagectomy (THE). While literature exists regarding the cost of robotic THE and its benefits, there is limited data analyzing cost and concurrent hospital reimbursement based on payor or provider. This study aimed to compare hospital reimbursement after robotic THE for patients with Medicare versus private insurance. With IRB approval, a prospective study of 85 patients from 2012 to 2022 who underwent robotic THE was conducted. Private insurance was defined as coverage excluding Medicare, Medicaid, or self-pay. Statistical analyses involved Student's t test, Chi-square test, and Fisher's exact test, with p ≤ 0.05 considered statistically significant. Data are presented as median (mean ± standard deviation). Among the 85 patients, 64 had Medicare, and 21 had private insurance. Medicare patients exhibited more frequent history of prior abdominal or thoracic surgeries (41% vs 10%, p < 0.01). Both groups showed no differences in factors like sex, body mass index, ASA classification, operative duration, estimated blood loss, conversions to 'open', tumor size, and major postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ III). Similarly, metrics such as hospital stay duration, in-hospital mortality, 30-day readmission, and various financial components including total and variable costs, hospital reimbursement, and net margin were consistent across both. Despite Medicare patients being older and often having a broader operative history, hospital costs and reimbursements did not differ from patients with private insurance post-robotic THE. The robotic platform appears to mitigate potential disparities in hospitalization costs and hospital reimbursement for THE between Medicare and private insurance.

A Video-Based Procedure-Specific Competency Assessment Tool for Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy.

Importance: Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is a complex procedure with substantial learning curves. In other complex minimally invasive procedures, suboptimal surgical performance has convincingly been associated with less favorable patient outcomes as assessed by peer review of the surgical procedure. Objective: To develop and validate a procedure-specific competency assessment tool (CAT) for MIE. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this international quality improvement study, a procedure-specific MIE-CAT was developed and validated. The MIE-CAT contains 8 procedural phases, and 4 quality components per phase are scored with a Likert scale ranging from 1 to 4. For evaluation of the MIE-CAT, intraoperative MIE videos performed by a single surgical team in the Esophageal Center East Netherlands were peer reviewed by 18 independent international MIE experts (with more than 120 MIEs performed). Each video was assessed by 2 or 3 blinded experts to evaluate feasibility, content validity, reliability, and construct validity. MIE-CAT version 2 was composed with refined content aimed at improving interrater reliability. A total of 32 full-length MIE videos from patients who underwent MIE between 2011 and 2020 were analyzed. Data were analyzed from January 2021 to January 2023. Exposure: Performance assessment of transthoracic MIE with an intrathoracic anastomosis. Main Outcomes and Measures: Feasibility, content validity, interrater and intrarater reliability, and construct validity, including correlations with both experience of the surgical team and clinical parameters, of the developed MIE-CAT. Results: Experts found the MIE-CAT easy to understand and easy to use to grade surgical performance. The MIE-CAT demonstrated good intrarater reliability (range of intraclass correlation coefficients [ICCs], 0.807 [95% CI, 0.656 to 0.892] for quality component score to 0.898 [95% CI, 0.846 to 0.932] for phase score). Interrater reliability was moderate (range of ICCs, 0.536 [95% CI, -0.220 to 0.994] for total MIE-CAT score to 0.705 [95% CI, 0.473 to 0.846] for quality component score), and most discrepancies originated in the lymphadenectomy phases. Hypothesis testing for construct validity showed more than 75% of hypotheses correct: MIE-CAT performance scores correlated with experience of the surgical team (r = 0.288 to 0.622), blood loss (r = -0.034 to -0.545), operative time (r = -0.309 to -0.611), intraoperative complications (r = -0.052 to -0.319), and severe postoperative complications (r = -0.207 to -0.395). MIE-CAT version 2 increased usability. Interrater reliability improved but remained moderate (range of ICCs, 0.666 to 0.743), and most discrepancies between raters remained in the lymphadenectomy phases. Conclusions and Relevance: The MIE-CAT was developed and its feasibility, content validity, reliability, and construct validity were demonstrated. By providing insight into surgical performance of MIE, the MIE-CAT might be used for clinical, training, and research purposes.

Financial burden of postoperative complications following oesophagectomy: a scoping review protocol.

INTRODUCTION: The rapid rise in the incidence of oesophageal adenocarcinoma has resulted in an increasing number of patients undergoing oesophagectomy. Although novel surgical techniques are enhancing surgical outcomes, postoperative complications remain pervasive. Despite this, there are limited reviews mapping the cost of postoperative complications following oesophagectomy, and none has compared cost differences between patient groups. Such information would be invaluable in appreciating the financial burden on the healthcare system and serving to guide hospital financing decisions. This scoping review protocol outlines an approach to reviewing the literature to precipitate and inform discussions surrounding financing oesophagectomy procedures as well as funding requirements for upper gastrointestinal surgical units. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Adhering to the pertinent components of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Extension for Scoping Review Protocols guidelines, a systematic exploration will be conducted across electronic databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and Econolit, with further reference tracking of eligible studies. This review will encompass studies related to the costs associated with complications following oesophagectomy. All studies published prior to 31 October 2023 are eligible for inclusion. The process of screening and extracting data will be undertaken by two independent reviewers. Subsequently, the amassed data will be pooled and subjected to comprehensive analysis and presented descriptively, using both a mixed methods and a narrative approach. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was not required. The results will be communicated through established professional networks, conference presentations and publication in peer-reviewed journals.

Clasificación evolutiva y algoritmo de tratamiento quirúrgico de la mediastinitis aguda por perforación esofágica / Evolutionary classification and surgical treatment algorithm for acute mediastinitis through esophageal perforation

Introducción: la mediastinitis aguda constituye una complicación grave de la perforación esofágica. No existen clasificaciones ni pautas generales para su tratamiento. Objetivo: desarrollar una clasificación evolutiva, y un algoritmo de tratamiento quirúrgico. Métodos: se efectuó una investigación en el Hospital Provincial Saturnino Lora, de Santiago de Cuba, desde 1990 hasta el 2014. Se utilizó la prueba chi cuadrado de homogeneidad para la validación de los resultados, así como el porcentaje como medida de resumen y el calcula de las tasas de incidencia y de mortalidad. El estudio incluyó dos diseños metodológicos: el primero, de desarrollo tecnológico, para la elaboración de la clasificación y el algoritmo de tratamiento, y un cuasiexperimento, para la aplicación del algoritmo. Resultados: se identificó que en los estados más severos de la mediastinitis aguda, la mortalidad es más elevada. La carga de mortalidad para el primer grupo de pacientes fue del 77,7 por ciento y descendió al 22,3 por ciento en el grupo tratado con el algoritmo (decremento del riesgo del 64,8 por ciento). Conclusiones: la clasificación evolutiva pauta la implementación del algoritmo de tratamiento quirúrgico de la enfermedad. La aplicación del algoritmo de tratamiento quirúrgico de la mediastinitis aguda por perforación esofágica permite disminuir la carga de morbilidad. En consecuencia, disminuye de forma relevante el riesgo de morir por esta enfermedad(AU)

Introduction: acute mediastinitis is a serious complication of esophageal perforation. There are no classifications or general guidelines for its treatment. Objective: to develop an evolutionary classification and a surgical treatment algorithm. Methods: aresearch was carried out at Saturnino Lora Provincial Hospital in Santiago de Cuba, from 1990 to 2014. The chi-square homogeneity test was used for the validation of the results, as well as the percentage as a summary measure and the calculation of incidence rates and mortality. The study included two methodological designs: the first, technological development, for the elaboration of the classification and the treatment algorithm, and a quasi-experiment for the application of the algorithm. Results: in the more severe states of acute mediastinitis, mortality was identified as higher. The mortality load for the first group of patients was 77.7 percent and decreased to 22.3 percent in the group treated with the algorithm (risk reduction of 64.8 percent). Conclusions: the evolutionary classification guides the implementation of the surgical treatment algorithm of the disease. The application of the surgical treatment algorithm of acute mediastinitis through esophageal perforation allows reducing the burden of morbidity. Consequently, the risk of dying from this disease decreases significantly(AU)

Early and late assessment of esophagocardioplasty in the surgical treatment of advanced recurrent megaesophagus / Avaliação precoce e tardia da esofagocardioplastia no tratamento cirúrgico do megaesôfago avançado e recidivado

ABSTRACT Background Since Chagas disease has esophageal manifestations with different degrees of involvement, the best surgical option is controversial, especially for patients with advanced chagasic megaesophagus and recurrent symptoms after previous treatment. Objective To assess the early and late outcomes of esophagocardioplasty in a series of patients with advanced recurrent chagasic megaesophagus. Methods This descriptive study included 19 older patients with recurrent megaesophagus grade III/IV and positive immunofluorescence for Chagas disease. They had undergone cardiomyotomy with anterior fundoplication a mean of 16.5 years ago. Serra-Doria esophagocardioplasty was selected to treat the recurrence. The patients were followed to assess postoperative and late complications and the incidence of symptom recurrence. Results In early assessment, five (26.3%) patients presented clinical complications. One (5.2%) patient had a gastrointestinal fistula secondary to esophagogastric anastomotic leak, which responded well to conservative treatment. In the one-year follow-up, 18 (94.7%) patients could swallow normally and had no vomiting. Three years after surgery, 10 (62.5%) of 16 patients could swallow normally, and 3 (19.3%) patients complained of vomiting. Five years after surgery, only 5 (38.4%) of 13 patients could swallow normally and 7 (53.8%) had vomiting. Conclusion Serra-Doria esophagocardioplasty for the treatment of advanced recurrent megaesophagus had mild postoperative complications and good success rate in the short-term follow-up. In the long-term follow-up, it proved to be a poor surgery choice because of the high incidence of symptom recurrence, compromising quality of life. This procedure should be indicated only for patients with advanced recurrent megaesophagus without clinical conditions to undergo esophageal resection.

RESUMO Contexto A doença de Chagas, por apresentar manifestações esofágicas com diferentes graus de acometimento, faz com que haja controvérsias quanto a melhor opção cirúrgica; principalmente para pacientes com megaesôfago chagásico avançado e com recidiva de sintomas após tratamento prévio. Objetivo Avaliar o resultado precoce e tardio da esofagocardioplastia em uma série de pacientes com megaesôfago chagásico avançado e recidivado. Métodos Estudo descritivo, com 19 pacientes idosos com megaesôfago Grau III/IV recidivado e com imunoflorescência positiva para doença de Chagas. A cirurgia prévia foi a cardiomiotomia com fundoplicatura anterior, com tempo médio de realização de 16,5 anos. A cirurgia de eleição para o tratamento da recidiva foi a esofagocardioplastia de Serra-Dória. Realizou-se avaliação precoce para estudar as complicações pós-operatórias e tardias, para avaliar a incidência de recidiva de sintomas. Resultados Na avaliação precoce, 5 (26,3%) pacientes apresentaram complicações clínicas. Um (5,2%) paciente apresentou fístula digestiva consequente a deiscência da anastomose esofagogástrica, mas com boa evolução com o tratamento conservador. Na avaliação de 1 ano de pós-operatório, 18 (94,7%) pacientes apresentavam deglutição normal e sem regurgitação. Com 3 anos de pós-operatório, de 16 pacientes analisados; 10 (62,5%) pacientes apresentavam deglutição normal e 3 (19,3%) se queixavam de regurgitação. Com 5 anos de pós-operatório, de 13 pacientes analisados; somente 5 (38,4%) apresentavam deglutição normal e 7 (53.8%) com regurgitação. Conclusão A esofagocardioplastia de Serra-Dória, no tratamento cirúrgico do megaesôfago avançado recidivado, apresentou complicações pós-operatórias de baixa morbidade e com boa resolutividade, na avaliação precoce. Na avaliação de longo prazo, demonstrou não ser um procedimento cirúrgico adequado, pela alta incidência de recidiva de sintomas, com comprometimento da qualidade de vida. Deve ser indicada somente em pacientes com doença avançada recidivada, sem condições clínicas de serem submetidas à ressecção esofágica.

Efectividad y seguridad de la esofagectomía por laparoscopia en pacientes con acalasia con falla al tratamiento o progresión final de la enfermedad / Effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic esophagectomy in patients with achalasia with treatment failure or final disease progression

Introducción: la acalasia es una enfermedad de la motilidad primaria del esófago poco frecuente, sin embargo compromete altamente la calidad de vida de los pacientes que sufren la enfermedad. Alrededor de un 5 a 10% de los pacientes no presentan respuesta adecuada al tratamiento inicial y progresan a una fase final de la enfermedad caracterizada por una sintomatología más grave como disfagia incapacitante, desnutrición e incluso neumonía por aspiración. Los cambios anatómicos característicos de esta fase son un esófago dilatado y tortuoso en forma sigmoidea. Para esta población las opciones terapéuticas son más reducidas. Esta evaluación tecnológica se desarrolló en el marco de la actualización integral del Plan Obligatorio de Salud para el año 2015. Objetivo: evaluar la efectividad y seguridad del uso de la esofagectomía para el tratamiento de pacientes con acalasia con falla al tratamiento inicial o progresión de la enfermedad. Metodología: la evaluación fue realizada de acuerdo con un protocolo definido a priori. Se realizó una búsqueda sistemática hasta noviembre de 2014 en MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects y LILACS. No se identificaron las RSL y ECA que cumplieran los criterios de elegibilidad. Se presenta evidencia de estudios descriptivos tipo series de casos. Resultados: se identificaron 3 estudios de series de casos incluidas en la búsqueda realizada. En total se reportan 77 pacientes que fueron llevados a cirugía mínimamente invasiva o por laparoscopia transhiatal, la mortalidad fue reportada para los 3 estudios individuales. Se reportó mortalidad en uno de los estudios siendo del 9%, en los otros dos estudios no se presentaron muertes. En dos estudios se reportó el desenlace de disfagia, estuvo presente en 3/11 pacientes en el primer estudio, y en el segundo reportan un cambio en una escala de disfagia de 3,1 a 1,2 (a menor puntaje menos disfagia). Entre las complicaciones reportadas se identificaron las pulmonares como las más frecuentes, encontrándose un total de 4 neumotórax, 1 neumotórax y 3 fugas por la anastomosis. Conclusiones: la esofagectomía por laparoscopia o mínimamente invasiva mejora la disfagia en pacientes con acalasia con falla del tratamiento o progresión final de la enfermedad, las complicaciones más frecuentes fueron neumotórax y fuga de la anastomosis.(AU)

Avaliação dos resultados tardios de megaesôfago chagásico avançado operado pela técnica de esofagectomia com gastroplastia e operação de Serra Dória: estudo clínico, nutricional, endoscópico, anatomopatológico e avaliação da qualidade de vida / Late results of advanced Chagas'megaesophagus treated by esophagectomy with associated gastroplasty and by Serra Dória procedure: clinical, nutritional, endoscopic and pathological study and assessment of quality of life

O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar comparativamente os resultados tardios da esofagectomia transdiafragmática com gastroplastia e da operação de Serra Dória para o tratamento do megaesôfago avançado. Foi realizado estudo coorte em 44 pacientes. O seguimento tardio no Grupo EG foi de 77,0 meses, e no Grupo SD de 62,1 meses. Utilizou-se interrogatório para queixas gastrointestinais, escalas de Schechter e de Visick, assim como dois questionários. Incluíram-se dados antropométricos, bioquímicos e endoscópicos / The objective of the paper was to carry out a comparative evaluation of the late results of a transdiaphragmatic esophagectomy with an associated gastroplasty and of the Serra Dória procedure, for the treatment of advanced megaesophagus. A cohort study was done on 44 patients. Late follow up for the EG Group was 77.0 months, and for the SD Group, 62.1 months. Several tools were used, such as a series of questions for gastrointestinal complaints, the Schechter and the Visick scales. Anthropometric data were included, as well as the biochemical and endoscopic parameters...