RESUMO
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Patient symptom reporting often does not correlate with the pathophysiological markers of esophageal disease, including eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Esophageal hypervigilance and symptom-specific anxiety are emerging as important considerations in understanding symptom reporting. As such, we aimed to conduct the first study of these constructs in EoE. METHODS: A retrospective review of an EoE patient registry was conducted and included eosinophils per high power field (from esophagogastroduodenoscopy biopsy: proximal, distal), endoscopic reference score, distal distensibility plateau (functional luminal imaging probe), Brief Esophageal Dysphagia Questionnaire, Visual Dysphagia Question of EoE Activity Index, Northwestern Esophageal Quality of Life scale, and the Esophageal Hypervigilance and Anxiety Scale. Correlational and regression analyses evaluated relationships of hypervigilance and anxiety with Brief Esophageal Dysphagia Questionnaire, Visual Dysphagia Question of EoE Activity Index, and Northwestern Esophageal Quality of Life scale when controlling for histology and endoscopic severity. RESULTS: One hundred and three patients had complete data, 69.9% were male, and the mean (SD) age was 40.66 (13.85) years. Forty-one percent had elevated dysphagia and 46% had elevated hypervigilance and anxiety. Esophageal symptom-specific anxiety emerged as the most important predictor of Brief Esophageal Dysphagia Questionnaire severity (44.8% of the variance), Visual Dysphagia Question of EoE Activity Index severity (26%), and poor health-related quality of life (HRQoL) (55.3%). Hypervigilance was also important, but to a lesser extent. Pathophysiological variables did not significantly predict symptoms or HRQoL. Recent food impaction can predict symptom-specific anxiety and proton pump inhibitor use can reduce hypervigilance. CONCLUSIONS: Hypervigilance and symptom-specific anxiety are important for our understanding of self-reported patient outcomes in EoE. These processes outweigh endoscopic and histologic markers of EoE disease activity across dysphagia, difficulty eating, and HRQoL. Clinicians should assess hypervigilance and anxiety, especially in patients with refractory symptoms and poor HRQoL.
Assuntos
Ansiedade/etiologia , Deglutição , Dieta/efeitos adversos , Esofagite Eosinofílica/etiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Ansiedade/diagnóstico , Ansiedade/psicologia , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Endoscopia Gastrointestinal , Esofagite Eosinofílica/diagnóstico , Esofagite Eosinofílica/fisiopatologia , Esofagite Eosinofílica/psicologia , Feminino , Nível de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Qualidade de Vida , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos , Autorrelato , Avaliação de Sintomas , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The six-food elimination diet (SFED) is an effective treatment approach for eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), but it can be challenging and affect patients' quality of life. AIM: Assess patients' long-term adherence to SFED and potential factors influencing adherence. METHODS: EoE patients were recruited online via multiple platforms. Patients were classified as reaching the maintenance stage if they responded to SFED and identified specific trigger foods by reintroduction. Maintenance stage patients were categorized into those actively following the elimination diet (ACTIVE) and those no longer on their prescribed diet (FORMER). Participants completed a study-specific questionnaire assessing patient experiences related to SFED use. RESULTS: Forty-two participants were identified as having reached the SFED's maintenance stage. 57% (24/42) of the maintenance stage patients were ACTIVE users. FORMER users rated the SFED's effectiveness at treating symptoms (5.45 ± 3.96, 10 max.) lower than ACTIVE users (8.29 ± 2.76, p = .02). A greater percentage of FORMER users (100%) agreed social situations create challenges in following the diet compared to ACTIVE users (67%, p < .05). Anxiety related to SFED was also higher among FORMER users (64%) compared to ACTIVE users (21%, p < .01). Both ACTIVE (95.8%) and FORMER (81.8%, NSS) users would recommend the elimination diet to other EoE patients. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding SFED adherence is multifactorial and complex. Factors influencing SFED adherence during long-term maintenance with diet therapy include diet effectiveness, social situations, and diet-related anxiety. Despite a lower than expected long-term adherence to maintenance of an elimination diet, the majority would recommend diet therapy as a treatment to other EoE patients.
Assuntos
Dieta/efeitos adversos , Esofagite Eosinofílica/dietoterapia , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/dietoterapia , Cooperação do Paciente , Adaptação Psicológica , Adulto , Idoso , Ansiedade/psicologia , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Esofagite Eosinofílica/diagnóstico , Esofagite Eosinofílica/psicologia , Feminino , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/psicologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Qualidade de Vida , Indução de Remissão , Comportamento Social , Inquéritos e Questionários , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is an important cause of upper gastrointestinal dysfunction in children and adults. The EoE-quality of life (QOL)-A was validated as a disease-specific measure of quality of life in EoE. This study characterized the extent of QOL concerns in a cohort of adult EoE patients and delineated the relationships between QOL and other disease activity measures. One hundred sixty-seven patients enrolled in this prospective cohort study. Patients with established and suspected EoE undergoing endoscopy at a single university-based medical center were recruited. EoE was diagnosed on the basis of the clinical criteria and histologic demonstration of ≥15 eos/hpf while on proton pump inhibition therapy. Sixty five patients undergoing repeat endoscopy during the enrollment period participated twice. Patients provided demographic information and completed symptom assessments and the EoE-QOL-A. Analyses included comparisons with overall QOL as well as QOL subscales. Outcome measures included endoscopic activity using a validated instrument, the EoE Endoscopic Reference Score, and histology. Overall QOL was significantly correlated with dysphagia frequency, intensity, and severity (P < 0.001). Patients who experienced a food impaction in the last 30 days had significantly worse overall QOL (P = 0.009). There was no correlation between overall QOL and years since diagnosis, symptom duration, endoscopic features, or histologic findings. Patient symptoms correlated with endoscopic features of edema, rings, and stricture severity. Histologic activity was highly correlated with severity of endoscopic features. Patients who underwent repeat endoscopy with histologic response demonstrated improved eating and social QOL; however, overall QOL was unchanged. In adults with EoE, patient reported QOL is associated with symptom severity but not endoscopic or histologic features. Disease-specific QOL may complement parameters of biologic activity in the assessment of overall disease burden in EoE.
Assuntos
Esofagite Eosinofílica/psicologia , Qualidade de Vida , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Adulto , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Transtornos de Deglutição/etiologia , Transtornos de Deglutição/psicologia , Esofagite Eosinofílica/complicações , Esofagite Eosinofílica/tratamento farmacológico , Esofagoscopia , Esôfago/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic immune-mediated disease characterized by esophageal inflammation and dysfunction. Little is known about the humanistic and economic burden of the disease on patients, their caregivers, and the health care system. A systematic review was conducted to evaluate the existing literature on the disease burden of EoE for patients and their caregivers. METHODS: The MEDLINE, Embase, and Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews databases and recent congresses were searched on March 23, 2017, for English-language publications describing the impact of EoE on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in children and adults, and the economic burden associated with the disease. RESULTS: Of 676 articles identified, 22 met the inclusion criteria and were included in this analysis (HRQoL, 13; economic burden, 7; cost effectiveness, 2). The included studies showed that EoE is associated with a significant impact on HRQoL, resulting in disruption to and restrictions on daily life for patients, their caregivers, and, in some instances, their families. Treatment with topical corticosteroids, the 6-food elimination diet, or the cow's milk elimination diet significantly improved the HRQoL of patients with EoE. Symptom severity was associated strongly with the impact of EoE on HRQoL. Medical resource utilization costs for patients with EoE were significantly higher than those for healthy controls. CONCLUSIONS: EoE negatively impacts the HRQoL of patients and their families, and is a burden to the health care system. Although data are sparse, currently available treatments appear to improve HRQoL.
Assuntos
Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Esofagite Eosinofílica/economia , Esofagite Eosinofílica/psicologia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Qualidade de Vida , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Saúde Global , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Feeding dysfunction is a frequent presenting symptom of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Here we present 3 children of various ages whose manifestations of EoE associated feeding dysfunction led to significant and life altering impact on their growth and development. Early identification of presenting symptoms of EoE will allow for prompt diagnosis and initiation of appropriate treatments. Recognition of salient features of dysfunction and treatment by feeding therapists and nutritionists led to symptom resolution and growth.
Assuntos
Transtornos de Deglutição/etiologia , Deglutição , Ingestão de Alimentos , Esofagite Eosinofílica/complicações , Esôfago/fisiopatologia , Comportamento Alimentar , Adolescente , Pré-Escolar , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Transtornos de Deglutição/diagnóstico , Transtornos de Deglutição/fisiopatologia , Transtornos de Deglutição/psicologia , Transtornos de Deglutição/terapia , Esofagite Eosinofílica/diagnóstico , Esofagite Eosinofílica/fisiopatologia , Esofagite Eosinofílica/psicologia , Esofagite Eosinofílica/terapia , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Qualidade de Vida , Resultado do Tratamento , Aumento de PesoRESUMO
GOALS: This study aims to qualitatively describe experiences of adult patients diagnosed with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Specifically, we aim to identify disease-specific concerns related to patient-reported outcomes in this population to inform clinical care and assessment. BACKGROUND: EoE is a chronic inflammatory disease of the esophagus and is increasingly recognized as a cause of dysphagia in adults. On the basis of its symptoms, limited and restrictive treatment options and potential for social and psychological impact, it is logical to expect that the health related quality of life of EoE patients would be an important outcome marker for assessment. STUDY: Twenty-four EoE patients participated in semistructured interviews about their illness experiences. Participants also provided demographic and clinical data, and completed the Medical Outcome Study Short Form 12 to assess mental and physical function. RESULTS: Six themes emerged from qualitative analyses which centered around 3 main points: concerns about the illness itself, concerns about swallowing difficulty, and concerns about the impact of EoE on social interactions. Patients were generally open to disclosing their illness status and reported relief at receipt of the EoE diagnosis. EoE patients did not differ from healthy norms for physical well-being, and were similar to comparable illness groups for mental functioning. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated that EoE has substantial impact on several psychosocial domains that are not adequately addressed by focused assessment of physical complaints of dysphagia. The results support the importance of development of disease-specific instruments pertaining to quality of life in EoE patients.