Opioid use surrounding diagnosis and follow-up in patients with ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis, and rheumatoid arthritis: Results from US claims databases.

OBJECTIVE: To describe patients' use of opioids in the year preceding and year following new diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis (AS), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), or rheumatoid arthritis (RA), compared with patients without the/se diseases. METHODS: This study used US IBM® MarketScan® Commercial Claims and Encounters (CCAE) and Medicaid data and included three cohorts, comprised of incident cases of AS, PsA, or RA (2010-2017). Three matched comparator patients (without the incident disease) were selected for each patient within the disease cohort. Opioid use and appropriate treatment exposure (as defined by US guideline recommendations) in the 12-month baseline and follow-up periods were evaluated using descriptive analyses. RESULTS: Prevalence of claims for opioids was higher for disease cohorts vs. comparators in CCAE; 36.4% of patients with AS, 29.5% with PsA, and 44.4% with RA did not have any claim for guideline-appropriate therapy in follow-up. Prevalence of claims for opioids was also higher for disease cohorts vs. comparators in Medicaid; 30.6% of patients with AS, 36.6% with PsA, and 65.4% with RA did not have any claim for guideline-appropriate therapy in follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with AS, PsA, or RA, there was high reliance on opioids at and around the time of diagnosis. Significant proportions of patients were not on appropriate treatment as defined by professional society post-diagnosis guidelines; this discordance between actual patient therapies and treatment recommendations may suggest a need for better awareness of appropriate pain management and treatment strategies in rheumatic diseases. Key Points • This study analysed opioid use among patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), or rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and adds to current knowledge by expanding beyond assessment of opioid use at diagnosis, to the year before and after diagnosis. • Opioid use was found to be highly prevalent in AS, PsA, and RA in the year prior to diagnosis and, interestingly, was still seen during the year after diagnosis. • Opioids are neither disease modifying, nor a targeted/recommended treatment for chronic autoimmune diseases. In addition to their association with significant economic costs, opioids are potentially hazardous and are not better than alternative treatments with superior safety profiles. • The reasons behind opioid prescribing patterns should be explored further to support movement to targeted therapies.

Incidence Rate and Factors Associated With Fractures Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Ankylosing Spondylitis in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the incidence rate and factors associated with fractures among adults with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study with data from the Rheumatology Informatics System for Effectiveness registry linked to Medicare claims from 2016 to 2018. Patients were required to have two AS International Classification of Diseases codes 30 or more days apart and a subsequent Medicare claim. Then, 1 year of baseline characteristics were included, after which patients were observed for fractures. First, we calculated the incidence rate of fractures. Second, we constructed logistic regression models to identify factors associated with the fracture, including age, sex, race and ethnicity, body mass index, Medicare/Medicaid dual eligibility, area deprivation index, Charlson comorbidity index, smoking status, osteoporosis, historical fracture, and use of osteoporosis treatment, glucocorticoids, and opioids. RESULTS: We identified 1,426 adults with prevalent AS. Mean ± SD age was 69.4 ± 9.8 years, 44.3% were female, and 77.3% were non-Hispanic White. Fractures occurred in 197 adults with AS. The overall incidence rate of fractures was 76.7 (95% confidence interval [CI] 66.4-88.6) per 1,000 person-years. Older age (odds ratio [OR] 2.8, 95% CI 1.39-5.65), historical fracture (OR 5.24, 95% CI 3.44-7.99), and use of more than 30 mg morphine equivalent (OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.08-3.19) conferred increased odds of fracture. CONCLUSIONS: In this large sample of Medicare beneficiaries with AS, increasing age, historical fracture, and use of opioids had higher odds of fracture. Men and women were equally likely to have a fracture. Because opioid use was associated with fracture in AS, this high-risk population should be considered for interventions to mitigate risk.

Characteristics and burden of disease in patients with radiographic versus non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis in the ASRI cohort.

BACKGROUND: Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) comprises patients with both radiographic and non-radiographic features. Previous studies have shown similar burden of disease between these two groups. AIMS: The Ankylosing Spondylitis Registry of Ireland (ASRI) was formed with the objective to measure the burden of axial spondyloarthritis in the population and identify early predictors of a poor outcome. For this analysis, the ASRI database was used to compare the characteristics and burden of disease in patients with radiographic versus non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis. METHODS: Patients with radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (r-axSpA) were defined as those with X-ray evidence of sacroiliitis. Patients with non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) were defined as having MRI evidence of sacroiliitis but no X-ray evidence of sacroiliitis. RESULTS: In total, 764 patients were included. Analysis of radiographic status showed 88.1% (n = 673) of patients with r-axSpA and 11.9% (n = 91) with nr-axSpA (Table 1). Patients with nr-axSpA were younger (41.3 vs. 46.6 years, p < 0.01), had shorter disease duration (14.8 vs. 20.2 years, p < 0.01) and had lower proportion of males (66.6% vs. 78.4%, p = 0.02) with lower frequency of HLA-B27 positivity (73.6% vs. 90.5%, p < 0.01). The nr-axSpA group had lower BASDAI (3.37 vs. 4.05, p = 0.01), BASFI (2.46 vs. 3.88, p < 0.01), BASMI (2.33 vs. 4.34, p < 0.01), ASQoL (5.2 vs. 6.67, p = 0.02) and HAQ scores (0.38 vs. 0.57, p < 0.01). There were no significant differences in the prevalence of extra-musculoskeletal manifestations or use of medications. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence to suggest that the burden of disease is less in patients with non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis than radiographic axial spondyloarthritis.

Cost Effectiveness of Tofacitinib for the Treatment of Active Ankylosing Spondylitis in Greece.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Ankylosing spondylitis is a chronic, progressive, inflammatory, multidimensional, musculoskeletal disease primarily involving the axial skeleton. In addition, ankylosing spondylitis is associated with increased morbidity and mortality, significantly affecting productivity and overall quality of life. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the cost effectiveness of tofacitinib compared to currently marketed biologic treatment in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis who have responded inadequately to conventional therapy (biologic-naïve population) or previous biologic therapy (biologic-experienced population) in Greece. METHODS: A published model comprising a decision tree and a three-state Markov model was adapted from a public payer perspective over a lifetime horizon. Adalimumab and secukinumab, having the highest market shares among biologics for the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis in Greece (standard practice), were selected as comparators in the analysis. Clinical parameters captured treatment response defined per Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society 20 response, short-term and long-term changes in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index scores, long-term biologic treatment discontinuation, and adverse events. Efficacy, safety data, and utility values were elicited from the published literature. Direct costs pertaining to drug acquisition, monitoring, adverse events, and disease management costs were considered in the analysis (€2022). Model outcomes were patients' quality-adjusted life-years, total costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. All future outcomes were discounted at 3.5% per annum. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis was conducted to account for model uncertainty. RESULTS: In a biologic-naïve population, compared with adalimumab, tofacitinib produced an estimated 0.06 additional quality-adjusted life-years [QALYs] (10.67 vs 10.73), at additional costs of €2403 (€147,096 vs €149,500) resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of €41,378 per QALY gained. In a biologic-experienced population, the total cost per patient for tofacitinib and secukinumab was estimated to be €151,371 and €145,757, respectively. In terms of health outcomes, tofacitinib was associated with a 0.13 increment in QALYs compared with secukinumab resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of €42,784 per QALY gained. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis confirmed the deterministic results for both populations. CONCLUSIONS: Tofacitinib was estimated to be a cost-effective option for the treatment of active ankylosing spondylitis in Greece for both biologic-naive and biologic-experienced patients.

Difficult-to-treat axial spondyloarthritis is associated with psoriasis, peripheral involvement and comorbidities: results of an observational nationwide study.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the cumulative incidence and identify the factors associated with difficult-to-treat axial spondyloarthritis (D2T-axSpA) in French patients newly benefiting from the French 'long-term illness' (LTI) social security scheme for axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). METHODS: This national cohort study was based on the French National Medico-Administrative Database, SNDS, which contains data on hospitalisation, LTI and outpatient care consumption. All French patients newly receiving LTI benefits for ankylosing spondylitis (AS) between 2010 and 2013 were included in the study. In France, LTI is required to access biological/targeted synthetic DMARDs (b/tsDMARDs). The follow-up period ended on 31 December 2018. So-called D2T-axSpA was defined as the failure of three b/tsDMARDs or of two b/tsDMARDs with different modes of action. Comorbidities and extra-musculoskeletal manifestations were identified using previously described algorithms. Characteristics were compared between patients with D2T-axSpA and patients with non-D2T-axSpA who had received at least one b/tsDMARD with bivariate and multivariate analysis using logistic regression. Incidence rates of major cardiovascular event (MACE) and death were compared using competitive risk analysis. RESULTS: 22 932 patients were included. 10 798 (47.08%) patients received at least one bDMARD. None received tsDMARD. During follow-up, 2115 patients were classified as having D2T-axSpA, representing 19.59% of patients who received at least one bDMARD. In multivariate analysis, D2T-axSpA was significantly associated with female gender, peripheral involvement, psoriasis, hypertension and depression (p<0.001 for each case). There was no difference in the incidence of MACE (p=0.92) or death (p=0.87). CONCLUSION: D2T-axSpA affects one in five patients exposed to bDMARDs in this national cohort. D2T-axSpA is more common in women and patients with peripheral involvement and/or comorbidities.

Comparative Pharmacoeconomic Effectiveness of Interleukin-17 Inhibitors for the Treatment of Ankylosing Spondylitis.

The objective of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of IL-17 inhibitors (SEC, IXE, NTK) in the treatment of adult patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) in the healthcare system of the Russian Federation. Materials and methods. The study is a sub-analysis of a previously published systematic review and network meta-analysis of the comparative efficacy of biologics in adult patients with AS in the Russian Federation. NNT values were calculated for BASDAI 50 and ASAS 20/40 after 16 weeks of therapy for all studied drugs. CpR was estimated for each biologic after 16 weeks and one year of therapy. Additionally, we carried out an assessment of the financial burden of the most cost-effective strategies for the treatment of AS. The use of NTK is characterized by an average of no more than three patients needed to treat to achieve one ASAS 20/40 or BASDAI 50 response, while on IXE and SEC no more than 4-5 patients need to be treated, depending on the estimated effectiveness criterion. According to CpR estimate, NTK is the most cost-effective IL-17 inhibitor for the treatment of AS, both after 16 weeks and after one year of therapy. The obtained results make it possible to compare the effectiveness of IL-17 inhibitors from a clinical and economic points of view and can be used both in decision making on treatment strategies for individual patients and at the population level when deciding on the reimbursement of drugs.

Comparison of a second TNFi vs other biologic or targeted synthetic DMARD following an initial TNFi.

BACKGROUND: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, Crohn's disease, or ulcerative colitis may require treatment with a biologic or targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (b/tsDMARD). Often, a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) is the initial b/tsDMARD. The TNFi may not be effective or may not be well tolerated, so patients will opt for a different TNFi or switch to a non-TNFi b/tsDMARD. No preference for a TNFi or non-TNFi has been established and guidelines are unclear. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate effectiveness by comparing patients using a second TNFi vs a non-TNFi after initial use of TNFi based on treatment patterns and health care utilization. METHODS: This retrospective analysis used Medicare Advantage prescription drug (MAPD) plan, Medicaid, and commercial plan claims data from Humana's Research Database (Louisville, KY). The first claim for TNFi or non-TNFi (July 1, 2016, to June 30, 2018) following earlier TNFi was the index date. Patients were required to have pre-index enrollment of 6 months and 12 months post-index along with diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, or psoriasis. During the 12-month follow-up, persistence to the index TNFi or non-TNFi was measured as continued therapy without a gap exceeding 45 days (81 days for intravenous infusions). Adherence was proportion of days covered at least 0.8. Addition of a nonbiologic DMARD or corticosteroid was also identified. Inpatient admissions and emergency department visits were observed. Inverse probability of treatment weights was used to balance cohorts. Logistic regression models were fit to TNFi vs non-TNFI on treatment and utilization measures. RESULTS: Of identified patients, 1,022 were indexed to a second TNFi and 1,024 were indexed to non-TNFi. Weighted cohorts were balanced, with mean age 56.5 vs 56.4 years, 70.5% vs 70.7% female sex, and 68.0% vs 67.9% MAPD plan. No differences were observed on persistence or adherence, with adjusted odds ratios (OR) of 1.05 (95% CI = 0.91-1.20) and 1.04 (0.91-1.20), respectively. No differences were observed for changes in therapy via switching to another TNFi/non-TNFi (OR = 0.93; 95% CI = 0.54-1.62), via nonbiologic DMARD addition (OR = 0.95; 95% CI = 0.83-1.11), or corticosteroid addition (OR = 1.09; 95% CI = 0.92-1.88). No differences were observed for hospitalization (OR = 1.16; 95% CI = 0.99-1.37) or emergency department visits (OR = 1.02; 95% CI = 0.89-1.18). CONCLUSIONS: No differences were found between a second TNFi vs a non-TNFi. As a result, choice of TNFi or non-TNFi following an initial TNFi may be driven by relevant patient-specific considerations. At the population level, policies that prefer either TNFi or non-TNFi appear reasonable. DISCLOSURES: The study was funded by Humana Inc. Mr Racsa is an employee of Humana Healthcare Research, Inc., a subsidiary of Humana Inc. Drs Asante and Bloomfield are employees of Humana Inc. Dr Schwab was an employee of Humana Healthcare Research, Inc., a subsidiary of Humana Inc., and is now an employee of RTI Health Solutions. Dr Cornett was an employee of Humana Inc. and is now an employee of ImmunoGen Inc.

Identifying Predictors of First-Line Subcutaneous TNF-Inhibitor Persistence in Patients with Inflammatory Arthritis: A Decision Tree Analysis by Indication.

INTRODUCTION: Treatment persistence is a proxy for efficacy, safety and patient satisfaction, and a switch in treatment or treatment discontinuation has been associated with increased indirect and direct costs in inflammatory arthritis (IA). Hence, there are both clinical and economic incentives for the identification of factors associated with treatment persistence. Until now, studies have mainly leveraged traditional regression analysis, but it has been suggested that novel approaches, such as statistical learning techniques, may improve our understanding of factors related to treatment persistence. Therefore, we set up a study using nationwide Swedish high-coverage administrative register data with the objective to identify patient groups with distinct persistence of subcutaneous tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (SC-TNFi) treatment in IA, using recursive partitioning, a statistical learning algorithm. METHODS: IA was defined as a diagnosis of rheumatic arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis/unspecified spondyloarthritis (AS/uSpA) or psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Adult swedish biologic-naïve patients with IA initiating biologic treatment with a SC-TNFi (adalimumab, etanercept, certolizumab or golimumab) between May 6, 2010, and December 31, 2017. Treatment persistence of SC-TNFi was derived based on prescription data and a defined standard daily dose. Patient characteristics, including age, sex, number of health care contacts, comorbidities and treatment, were collected at treatment initiation and 12 months before treatment initiation. Based on these characteristics, we used recursive partitioning in a conditional inference framework to identify patient groups with distinct SC-TNFi treatment persistence by IA diagnosis. RESULTS: A total of 13,913 patients were included. Approximately 50% had RA, while 27% and 23% had AS/uSpA and PsA, respectively. The recursive partitioning algorithm identified sex and treatment as factors associated with SC-TNFi treatment persistence in PsA and AS/uSpA. Time on treatment in the groups with the lowest treatment persistence was similar across all three indications (9.5-11.3 months), whereas there was more variation in time on treatment across the groups with the highest treatment persistence (18.4-48.9 months). CONCLUSIONS: Women have low SC-TNFi treatment persistence in PsA and AS/uSpA whereas male sex and golimumab are associated with high treatment persistence in these indications. The factors associated with treatment persistence in RA were less distinct but may comprise disease activity and concurrent conventional systemic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) treatment.

Site-specific assessment of spinal radiographic progression improves detection of TNF blocker-associated disease modification in axial spondyloarthritis: longitudinal observational data from the Swiss Clinical Quality Management Registry.

OBJECTIVES: To analyse whether time-varying treatment with tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) in radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (r-axSpA) has a differential impact on structural damage progression on different spinal segments (cervical versus lumbar spine). METHODS: Patients with r-axSpA in the Swiss Clinical Quality Management cohort were included if cervical and lumbar radiographs were available at intervals of 2 years for a maximum of 10 years. Paired radiographs were scored by two calibrated readers according to the modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score (mSASSS). The relationship between TNFi use and progression in the cervical and the lumbar spine was analysed using generalised estimating equation models and adjustment for potential confounding. Radiographic progression per spinal segment was defined as an increase of ≥ 1 mSASSS unit or by the formation of ≥ 1 new syndesmophyte over 2 years. RESULTS: Mean ± SD symptom duration was 13.8 ± 9.8 years. Mean ± SD mSASSS progression per radiographic interval was 0.41 ± 1.69 units in the cervical spine and 0.45 ± 1.45 units in the lumbar spine (p = 0.66). Prior use of TNFi significantly reduced the odds of progression in the cervical spine by 68% (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.14-0.72), but not in the lumbar spine (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.52-1.88). A more restricted inhibition of progression in the lumbar spine was confirmed after multiple imputation of missing covariate data (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.24-0.77 and 0.85, 95% CI 0.51-1.41, for the cervical and lumbar spine, respectively). It was also confirmed with progression defined as formation of ≥ 1 syndesmophyte (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.12-0.80 versus OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.26-1.24 for the cervical and lumbar spine, respectively). CONCLUSION: Disease modification by treatment with TNFi seems to more profoundly affect the cervical spine in this r-axSpA population with longstanding disease. Site-specific analysis of spinal progression might, therefore, improve detection of disease modification in clinical trials in axSpA.

Assessment of complementary and alternative medicine methods in the management of ankylosing spondylitis, rheumatoid arthritis, and fibromyalgia syndrome.

A wide variety of musculoskeletal, arthritic, connective tissue, and vasculitic diseases fall under the umbrella of "rheumatic diseases". Ankylosing spondylitis, rheumatoid arthritis, and fibromyalgia syndrome are the three members of this disease group with relatively high prevalence. Pharmacological options are at the center of therapeutic algorithms in treating rheumatic diseases, particularly in reducing inflammation. Despite significant advances in pharmacological treatment in recent years, achieving complete treatment success in a group of patients is impossible. Therefore, patients with rheumatic diseases frequently utilize alternative treatment options, such as complementary and alternative medicine. Complementary and alternative medicine is a broad category of health practices not part of the leading health system. Patients with rheumatic diseases turn to complementary and alternative medicine for various reasons, including restricted access to some treatments due to high prices and rigorous regulations, worries about drug side effects, and symptoms that continue despite pharmacological treatment. In addition, because complementary and alternative medicine options are considered natural, they are frequently accepted as well tolerated and have few harmful effects. Ankylosing spondylitis, rheumatoid arthritis, and fibromyalgia syndrome are the primary foci of this comprehensive review. First, we attempted to summarize the non-traditional physical medicine and complementary and alternative medicine options that can be utilized to manage these diseases. Second, we addressed the link between exercise and inflammation in rheumatic diseases. We briefly discussed the possible benefits of exercise-based approaches. In addition, we highlighted the benefits of cooperation between rheumatology and physical medicine-rehabilitation clinics.

Risk of Hematologic Malignancies in Elderly Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Cohort Study and Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the risk of hematologic malignancies in older adults with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We used US Medicare data from January 1, 1999, to December 31, 2010, to identify a population-based cohort of beneficiaries with AS. We also included beneficiaries with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) as disease controls and beneficiaries without AS or IBD as unaffected controls. We excluded those treated with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors in this period. We followed up each group for new diagnosis claims for hematologic malignancies until September 30, 2015. RESULTS: We included 12,451 beneficiaries with AS, 234,905 with IBD, and 10,975,340 unaffected controls, with a mean follow-up of 9.9, 9.3, and 8.0 years, respectively. We identified 297 hematologic malignancies in the AS group, 4538 malignancies in the IBD group, and 128,239 malignancies in unaffected controls. The standardized incidence ratio in AS vs unaffected controls was 1.39 (95% CI, 1.05 to 1.61) for non-Hodgkin lymphoma, 1.50 (95% CI, 1.17 to 1.92) for chronic lymphocytic leukemia, and 1.52 (95% CI, 1.12 to 2.06) for multiple myeloma. Risks of acute myeloid leukemia and chronic myeloid leukemia were not elevated in AS, and there were too few cases of Hodgkin lymphoma to compute risks. Risks were comparable to those of beneficiaries with IBD. We also performed a systematic literature review of the risk of hematologic malignancy in AS, focusing on age associations, which have not been previously examined. We identified 21 studies in the systematic literature review, which included mainly young or middle-aged patients. Results suggested that AS was largely not associated with an increased risk of hematologic malignancies. Two cohort studies reported an increased risk of multiple myeloma in AS. CONCLUSION: The risks of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, and multiple myeloma are increased among elderly patients with AS.

Discontinuation of biologic therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis: analysis from multicenter cohort study.

Despite of the availability of several effective bDMARDs, a significant proportion of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients discontinued bDMARDs. The aims of this study were to analyze causes of bDMARDs discontinuation in RA and AS included in the Moroccan registry RBSMR. A historical prospective multicenter cohort study based on the RBSMR database at 12 months of follow-up, which included 225 RA and 170 AS. Using T student, Mann-Whitney U, chi-squared or Fischer exact tests, baseline demographic and clinical features were compared between patients discontinuing bDMARDs and patients remaining on initiated bDMARDs or switching bDMARDs. Logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with drugs discontinuation. 61 RA discontinued bDMARDs and 47 AS interrupted anti-TNF. The most common reasons for drugs discontinuation were adverse events (7.5%) in RA patients and social security reimbursement problems (16.8%) in AS. RA patients discontinuing bDMARDs were more frequently first-line biological drugs users, more frequently female and had more comorbidities and lower DAS28 CRP than RA patients remaining on initiated bDMARDs or switching bDMARDs (p < 0.001, p = 0.01, p < 0.001 and p < 0.001 respectively). Female sex and comorbidities were the significant predictors of bDMARDs discontinuation in RA patients. Higher baseline BASDAI had a protective role on anti-TNF interruption in AS patients. Adverse events and social security reimbursement problems were the main reasons for drugs discontinuation in RA and AS patients respectively. Female sex and comorbidities in RA patients, baseline BASDAI in AS patients impacted bDMARDs discontinuation in real-life settings.

A clinical practice guideline for the screening and assessment of enthesitis in patients with spondyloarthritis.

Objective: The aim of this review is to provide guidance on the selection of approaches to the screening and assessment of enthesitis in patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA). Methods: Twenty-four questions regarding the approaches to the screening and assessment of enthesitis and the implementation details were devised, followed by a systemic literature review. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology was employed in the development of this guideline, with modifications to evaluate non-interventional approaches under comprehensive consideration of costs, accessibility, and evidence strength. A consensus from the voting panel was required for the inclusion of the final recommendations and the strength of each recommendation. Results: Seventeen recommendations (including five strong recommendations) were included in this guideline. The voting panel expressed unequivocal support for the necessity of screening and assessment of enthesitis in patients with SpA. It was agreed unanimously that symptom evaluation and physical examination should serve as the initial steps to the recognition of enthesitis, whereas Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score is a reliable tool in both clinical trials and daily medical practice. Ultrasound examination is another reliable tool, with power Doppler ultrasound as an informative addition. Notwithstanding its high resolution, MRI is limited by the costs and relatively low accessibility, whereas radiographs had low sensitivity and therefore should be rendered obsolete in the assessment of enthesitis. PET/CT was strongly opposed in the detection of enthesitis. Conclusion: This guideline provides clinicians with information regarding the screening and assessment of enthesitis in patients with SpA. However, this guideline does not intend on dictating choices, and the ultimate decisions should be made in light of the actual circumstances of the facilities.

Direct Medical Costs and Healthcare Resource Utilization of Treating Patients With Two Clinical Subtypes of Axial Spondyloarthritis in Colombia.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to calculate the healthcare resource utilization and direct medical costs in patients with 2 subtypes of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) in a rheumatic care center in Colombia. METHODS: This is a retrospective cost-of-illness study. Patients with at least 1 medical consultation associated with an axSpA diagnosis between October 2018 and October 2019 were identified. Patients were classified as having radiographic (r-axSpA) or nonradiographic axSpA (nr-axSpA). Direct medical costs were calculated in Colombian pesos and expressed in American dollars using an exchange rate of 3263 Colombian pesos = 1 US dollar ($). Predictors of total direct costs were identified using a generalized linear model with gamma distribution and log-link. RESULTS: A total of 162 patients with a mean age of 49.6 years (± 13.7) were included in the study. Among these, 147 (90.7%) were considered as having r-axSpA and 15 (9.3%) nr-axSpA, with mean costs of $6600 (± 6203) and $843 (± 1135), respectively (P < .001). The total direct mean cost was calculated at $6067 (± 6144) per patient. Medication costs were the main driver of total costs (97.6%, $5921), with biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs accounting for nearly 92.0% ($5582) of these costs. Rheumatologist (100%) and physiatrist (64.2%) visits were the most frequently used medical service. CONCLUSIONS: The economic burden associated with axSpA in the Colombian setting is substantial. There is a significant difference in direct medical costs between the r-axSpA and the nr-axSpA. Health policies aimed at the comprehensive management of nr-axSpA would have an important role in the reduction of the associated direct medical costs.

Adalimumab para espondilitis anquilosante / Adalimumab for ankylosing spondylitis

INTRODUCCIÓN: La EA es una forma crónica de artritis de origen desconocido que forma parte del grupo de las espondiloartritis. Este último comprende un conjunto de enfermedades inflamatorias que se caracterizan por el compromiso de las articulaciones sacroilíacas y de la columna. 1 En la EA predomina el compromiso de la columna o axial, existiendo un cierto grado de daño estructural visible en la radiografía simple (a diferencia de la espondiloartritis axial no radiológica en la cual no se observa compromiso en la radiografía simple), y con frecuencia progresa hacia anquilosis de las articulaciones afectadas. A su vez, hasta la mitad de los pacientes con EA presentan compromiso articular periférico, principalmente de grandes articulaciones como caderas y rodillas. Puede acompañarse de manifestaciones extra articulares, como la uveítis, o de enfermedades asociadas, como la enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal. Es una enfermedad discapacitante con un gran impacto en la productividad laboral y la calidad de vida de los pacientes; acarreando un aumento en los costos directos e indirectos tanto para el paciente, como para la sociedad. OBJETIVO: El objetivo del presente informe es evaluar la eficacia, seguridad, recomendaciones, políticas de cobertura y aspectos económicos de adalimumab para espondilitis anquilosante. MÉTODOS: Se buscó en los sitios públicos de Pubmed, LILACS, BRISA/REDETSA-, CRD (del inglés, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination- University of York), Cochrane; en "buscadores genéricos de internet" y sociedades científicas. En lo que respecta a agencias de ETS, se buscó en: Base de datos internacional para las ETS de INHATA (su sigla del inglés, International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment), Base Regional de Informes de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud de las Américas (BRISA), y en agencias como NICE (del inglés, National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence) del Reino Unido; PBAC (del inglés, The Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee) de Australia; CADTH (del inglés, Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health) de Canadá y CONITEC (del portugués, Comissão Nacional de Incorporação de Tecnologías no SUS) de Brasil. RESULTADOS: No se encontraron estudios que comparen en forma directa al adalimumab con otros agentes biológicos en pacientes con EA activa a pesar de la terapia habitual (AINES). Evidencia de alta calidad muestra que adalimumab, en pacientes con EA activa y respuesta inadecuada o intolerancia a la terapia habitual, es superior al placebo más terapia habitual en el control de la actividad de la enfermedad, medida a través de escalas clínicas validadas. Los resultados del estudio de extensión abierto, a cinco años, son consistentes con los de los ensayos clínicos. Evidencia de baja calidad, proveniente de comparaciones indirectas, sugiere que adalimumab sería similar a otros agentes biológicos en esta indicación. Las guías de práctica clínica consideran al adalimumab como una de las alternativas de tratamiento en esta población de pacientes y recomiendan considerar la presencia de manifestaciones extra articulares para la elección del tratamiento. Los financiadores de salud públicos y privados de Europa y Estados Unidos relevados, prestan cobertura a este y otros fármacos biológicos para esta indicación, sin recomendar uno por sobre el otro. La mayoría de las políticas de cobertura de América Latina relevadas, cubren al adalimumab en EA y el mismo se encuentra en el Sistema Único de Recupero (SUR) de la Superintendencia de Servicios de Salud de Argentina. Algunas guías y políticas de cobertura afirman que en caso de que más de un fármaco sea adecuado, deben contemplarse los costos en la selección. Los resultados del análisis de impacto presupuestario acumulado a tres años, bajo los supuestos asumidos, en pacientes con respuesta inadecuada a AINES, muestran que la tecnología generaría ahorros. CONCLUSIONES: No se encontraron estudios que comparen en forma directa al adalimumab con otros agentes biológicos en pacientes con espondilitis anquilosante activa a pesar de la terapia habitual (anti inflamatorios no esteroideos). Evidencia de alta calidad muestra que adalimumab, en pacientes con espondilitis anquilosante activa y respuesta inadecuada o intolerancia a la terapia habitual, es superior al placebo más terapia habitual en el control de la actividad de la enfermedad, medida a través de escalas clínicas validadas. Los resultados del estudio de extensión abierto, a cinco años, son consistentes con los de los ensayos clínicos. Evidencia de baja calidad, proveniente de comparaciones indirectas, sugiere que adalimumab sería similar a otros agentes biológicos en esta indicación, a excepción del upadacitinib donde no se halló evidencia comparativa. Las guías de práctica clínica consideran al adalimumab como una de las alternativas de tratamiento en esta población de pacientes y recomiendan considerar la presencia de manifestaciones extra articulares para la elección del tratamiento. Los financiadores de salud públicos y privados de Europa y Estados Unidos relevados, prestan cobertura a este y otros fármacos biológicos para esta indicación, sin recomendar uno por sobre otro. La mayoría de las políticas de cobertura de América Latina relevadas, cubren al adalimumab en espondilitis anquilosante y el mismo se encuentra en el Sistema Único de Recupero (SUR) de la Superintendencia de Servicios de Salud de Argentina. Algunas guías y políticas de cobertura afirman que en caso de que más de un fármaco sea adecuado, deben contemplarse los costos en la selección. Los resultados del análisis de impacto presupuestario acumulado en los próximos tres años, bajo los supuestos asumidos, en pacientes con respuesta inadecuada a anti inflamatorios no esteroideos, muestran que la tecnología generaría ahorros.

Functionality assessment in patients with rheumatic diseases undergoing treatment in the Public Health System.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the therapeutic response (functionality) and its associated factors in patients on biological drugs on the Public Health System for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis. METHODS: An open prospective cohort was carried out from 2011 to 2019, in Belo Horizonte (MG). Functionality was assessed using the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability-Index at baseline, and after 6 and 12 months of follow-up. Factors associated with poor functionality were identified through logistic regression. RESULTS: The median Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability-Index at baseline was 1.5 (interquartile range of 0.8-1.9), with poor functionality observed in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Improved functionality was seen at 6 months of treatment for the three diseases. The predictors of poor functionality at 6 months for psoriatic arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis were female sex, low education levels, and high disease activity; and for rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis were female sex, advanced age, and high disease activity. In 12 months, the three diseases had predictors of worse functionality: female sex, low education, and high disease activity. CONCLUSION: There was a significant improvement in functionality during the follow-up, with better response at 6 months of treatment. Poor functionality was observed in older, female patients, with low education and high disease activity.

Comparative assessment of pharmacokinetic parameters between HS016, an adalimumab biosimilar, and adalimumab (Humira®) in healthy subjects and ankylosing spondylitis patients: Population pharmacokinetic modeling.

BACKGROUND: The HS016 is an adalimumab biosimilar related to the immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) antibody, with a similar amino acid sequence. OBJECTIVES: To quantify the differences in the pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of HS016 and adalimumab in healthy individuals and patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The PK data for HS016 and adalimumab were obtained in a randomized, double-blind, phase 1 clinical study in Chinese healthy subjects after a single-dose subcutaneous administration (136 healthy subjects), and in a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial of AS patients who received subcutaneous injection of HS016 or adalimumab once every 2 weeks for 24 weeks (366 AS patients). RESULTS: The time course of HS016 and adalimumab was characterized by a one-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination kinetics. Age, body weight, creatinine clearance (CLcr) and anti-drug antibody were covariates for the apparent clearance (CL/F); body weight and subject type were significant covariates for the apparent volume of distribution (V/F). The V/F and CL/F were estimated at 11.3 L and 0.0102 L/h. The ratios of the geometric least square (LS) means (HS016 compared to the adalimumab treatment group after multiple doses) in healthy subjects were 97.14 (87.70, 107.59) for the concentration-time curve from time zero to the last measurable concentration (AUC0-t) and 99.14 (90.03, 109.16) for the maximum serum drug concentration within a steady-state dosing interval (Cmax, ss); the ratios (90% confidence interval (90% CI)) in AS patients were 97.03 [84.10; 111.96] for the AUC within the steady-state dose intervals (AUC0-tau) and 99.62 [88.09; 112.68] for Cmax, ss. CONCLUSIONS: The systemic exposure of HS016 was similar to that of adalimumab in healthy subjects and AS patients, demonstrating PK similarity.

Health-Care and Societal Costs Associated with Non-Persistence with Subcutaneous TNF-α Inhibitors in the Treatment of Inflammatory Arthritis (IA): A Retrospective Observational Study.

OBJECTIVE: A few studies have suggested that patients with inflammatory arthritis (IA) who remain persistent with subcutaneous TNF-α inhibitors (SC-TNFi) incur lower health care costs than patients who discontinue treatment, whereas data on the impact of non-persistence on indirect costs are largely lacking. Furthermore, existing estimates are based on fixed follow-ups, in relation to treatment initiation, and therefore do not measure costs in direct relation to treatment discontinuation. Therefore, by capturing costs in direct relation to treatment discontinuation, this study aimed to estimate direct and indirect costs associated with non-persistence with SC-TNFis in IA. METHODS: Adult Swedish biologic-naïve IA patients initiating biologic treatment with a SC-TNFi (adalimumab, etanercept, certolizumab or golimumab) between May 6, 2010, and December 31, 2017, were identified in population-based registers with almost complete coverage. IA was defined as a diagnosis of rheumatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis/unspecified spondyloarthritis or psoriatic arthritis. Non-persistent patients were matched on propensity score to patients persistent with treatment by at least an additional 12 months. This enabled comparisons of direct healthcare costs and indirect costs for sick leave and disability pension, respectively, 12 months before and 12 months after treatment discontinuation. RESULTS: A balanced cohort of 486 matched pairs was generated. The total direct and indirect costs were significantly higher among non-persistent patients already during the 12 months before index ($20,802 [18,335-23,429] vs. $16,600 [14,331-18,696]). However, while non-persistent patients increased their total direct and indirect costs, persistent patients significantly decreased the same, further widening the difference in costs during the 12-month period after index date ($22,161 [19,754-24,556] vs. $13,465 [11,415-15,729]). CONCLUSIONS: Among biologic-naïve Swedish IA patients treated with SC-TNFis, persistent patients incurred about 40% lower aggregated direct and indirect costs compared to non-persistent patients the year following SC-TNFi discontinuation. This highlights the impact of treatment persistence from an economic viewpoint, adding further aspects to the clinical perspective.

Peripheral quantitative computed tomography in the assessment of bone mineral density in anti-TNF-treated rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis patients.

INTRODUCTION: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS) are associated with osteoporosis. There have not been many peripheral quantitative computed tomography (QCT) studies in patients receiving biologics. We assessed volumetric and areal bone mineral density (BMD) by forearm QCT and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), respectively in addition to laboratory biomarkers in these arthritides. METHODS: Forty RA and AS patients treated with either etanercept (ETN) or certolizumab pegol (CZP) were undergoing follow-ups for one year. Volumetric and areal BMD, as well as parathyroid hormone (PTH), osteocalcin, RANKL, 25-hydroxyvitamin D (VITD), P1NP, CTX, sclerostin (SOST), Dickkopf 1 (DKK-1) and cathepsin K (CATHK) were determined. RESULTS: We did not observe any further bone loss during the 12-month treatment period. Volumetric and areal BMD showed significant correlations with each other (p<0.017 after Bonferroni's correction). Trabecular QCT BMD at baseline (p=0.015) and cortical QCT BMD after 12 months (p=0.005) were inversely determined by disease activity at baseline in the full cohort. Trabecular QCT BMD at baseline also correlated with CTX (p=0.011). In RA, CRP negatively (p=0.014), while SOST positively (p=0.013) correlated with different QCT parameters. In AS, RANKL at baseline (p=0.014) and after 12 months (p=0.007) correlated with cortical QCT BMD. In the full cohort, 12-month change in QTRABBMD was related to TNF inhibition together with elevated VITD-0 levels (p=0.031). Treatment and lower CATHK correlated with QCORTBMD changes (p=0.006). In RA, TNF inhibition together with VITD-0 (p<0.01) or CATHK-0 (p=0.002), while in AS, treatment and RANKL-0 (p<0.05) determined one-year changes in QCT BMD. CONCLUSIONS: BMD as determined by QCT did not change over one year of anti-TNF treatment. Disease activity, CATHK, RANKL and VITD may be associated with the effects of anti-TNF treatment on QCT BMD changes. RA and AS may differ in this respect.

Hidden in plain sight: Is there a crucial role for enthesitis assessment in the treatment and monitoring of axial spondyloarthritis?

OBJECTIVE: To review the evidence surrounding the pathophysiology of enthesitis in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), its prevalence and contribution to the overall disease burden, and response to treatment at axial and peripheral sites. METHODS: Literature searches of the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Embase / Medline using the terms "enthesitis", "enthesopathy", "spondyloarthritis", "axial spondyloarthritis", and "ankylosing spondylitis" were conducted. Publications mentioning enthesitis or enthesopathy in the context of pathophysiology, diagnosis, or treatment were included. RESULTS: Enthesitis is a common symptom of axSpA, occurring with high prevalence at axial and several peripheral sites. Inflammation at the site of enthesis is an early key manifestation of axSpA. Clinically evaluable enthesitis contributes significantly to the burden of disease, correlating with worse symptomatology and downstream structural damage. Despite its importance in driving axSpA disease processes, enthesitis is somewhat neglected in current approaches to disease assessment and management. Enthesitis is excluded from some commonly used disease activity measures, is not routinely assessed in clinical practice, and many methods of clinical assessment omit key accessible axial sites, such as the spinous processes. CONCLUSION: Enthesitis plays a central role in driving the pathophysiology of axSpA. There is a need for a renewed focus on the early detection, measurement and treatment of enthesitis.