Cost-effectiveness of transcatheter valvular interventions: economic challenges.

The unsustainable trend of rising healthcare costs necessitates difficult allocation decisions by governments, policymakers, and physicians. Consequently, recent advances in transcatheter valve therapies require not only clinical evaluation, but also careful economic evaluation. Under current indications, each year there are nearly 18,000 new candidates for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in European countries and an additional 9,200 in North America, with an estimated cost of more than $2 billion per year. Nonetheless, when compared with standard medical therapy for severe aortic stenosis (AS), TAVI leads to gains in life expectancy at an incremental cost that is acceptable by most Western standards. On the other hand, for high-risk (but operable) patients with severe AS, TAVI provides no proven survival advantage and only a transient quality of life benefit compared with surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). Thus, for these patients, the cost-effectiveness of TAVI compared with SAVR hinges on the magnitude and duration of the quality of life benefit as well as the relative cost of both procedures. Current data suggest that, for patients who are eligible for transfemoral access, TAVI is economically attractive (or even economically dominant) compared with high-risk SAVR. However, the cost-effectiveness of TAVI for patients who are not suitable for a transfemoral approach appears to be less favourable. Transcatheter mitral valve repair is in an earlier stage of clinical implementation than TAVI. As the evidence for this procedure accumulates, more formal economic analysis should be feasible.

Comparative study on safety, efficacy, and midterm results of balloon mitral valvotomy performed with triple lumen and double lumen mitral valvotomy catheters.

BACKGROUND: The triple lumen Inoue balloon is routinely used for balloon mitral valvotomy (BMV) in India. Its major limitation is the high cost. The double lumen Accura balloon is less expensive, making it an attractive alternative in the developing countries. The study was meant to assess the safety, efficacy and midterm results of Accura balloon with respect to the Inoue balloon. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 816 consecutive patients, who underwent elective BMV in this Institute from 1997 to 2003, were included in the study. The data of 487 patients who underwent BMV with Accura balloon was compared with 329 patients who underwent BMV with Inoue balloon. The clinical, echocardiographic, and hemodynamic data of these patients were analyzed retrospectively to assess the safety and efficacy of Accura balloon with respect to the Inoue balloon. RESULTS: Immediate procedural success (93.9% in Inoue group and 91.6% in Accura group p. NS) and complications (6.6% in Inoue group and 5.6% in Accura group p. NS) were comparable between the study groups. The two study population had similar restenosis rate and events at 1 year after BMV. Both balloons could be reused multiple times without compromising on the safety and effectiveness. Accura balloons were less costly than Inoue balloon. The reusability with Accura was slightly more and found to be more cost-effective. CONCLUSIONS: Both Accura and Inoue balloon mitral valvotomy balloons are effective in providing relief from hemodynamically significant mitral stenosis in terms of gain in valve area and reduction in trans mitral gradient. Both groups have similar procedural success and complication rates, restenosis, and follow-up events at 1 year. Both balloons could be reused multiple times and Accura balloon is found to be more cost effective.

A minimally invasive approach is more cost-effective than a traditional sternotomy approach for mitral valve surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the cost and effectiveness of a minimally invasive (MI) versus traditional sternotomy (ST) approach for mitral valve surgery (MVS). METHODS: From January 1, 2003, to December 31, 2008, a total of 847 patients underwent isolated MVS at our institution. Propensity matching on 22 clinical variables was carried out to generate a study cohort of 434 patients (217 matched pairs). Direct and indirect costs from the hospital perspective were retrospectively obtained from our finance department. Total hospital costs were further stratified into 13 standardized institutional billing categories. In addition, data on morbidity, mortality, discharge location, hospital readmissions within 1 year, and freedom from reoperation were obtained. RESULTS: Compared with ST, MIMVS was associated with a $9054 ± $3302 lower mean total hospital cost (P = .006), driven largely by a reduction in direct (P = .003) versus indirect costs (P = .06). Among the 13 billing categories, MIMVS was associated with a significant reduction in costs of cardiac imaging (P = .004), laboratory tests (P = .005), boarding and nursing (P = .001), and radiology (P = .002). More patients in the ST group required intubation for more than 72 hours (P = .019); however, there were no differences in morbidity or long-term survival (P = .334). A higher proportion of MI patients were discharged home with no nursing services (P = .018), and a higher proportion of ST patients required readmission within 1 year (P = .023). There were no differences in freedom from reoperation between groups (P = .574). CONCLUSIONS: With equivalent efficacy across a range of measures and lower costs compared with ST, MIMVS represents a cost-saving strategy for MVS.

Does robotic technology make minimally invasive cardiac surgery too expensive? A hospital cost analysis of robotic and conventional techniques.

BACKGROUND: While potential benefits of robotic technology include decreased morbidity and improved recovery, some have suggested a prohibitively high cost. This study was undertaken to compare actual hospital costs of robotically assisted cardiac procedures with conventional techniques. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of clinical and financial data of 20 patients who underwent atrial septal defect (ASD) closure and 20 patients who underwent mitral valve repair (MVr) using either robotic techniques or a conventional approach with a sternotomy. Total hospital cost (actual resource consumption) was subdivided into operative and postoperative costs. RESULTS: Robotic technology did not significantly increase total hospital cost for ASD closure or MVr (p = 0.518 and p = 0.539). However, when including the initial capital investment for the robot through amortization of institutional costs, total hospital cost was increased by $3,773 for robotic ASD closure and $3,444 for robotic MVr (p = 0.021 and p = 0.004). The major driver of cost for robotic cases (operating room time) decreased over time. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic technology did not significantly increase hospital cost. While the absolute cost for robotic surgery was higher than conventional techniques after taking into account the institutional cost of the robot, the major driver of cost for robotic procedures will likely continue to decrease, as the surgical team becomes increasingly familiar with robotic technology. Furthermore, other benefits, such as improvement in postoperative quality of life and more expeditious return to work may make a robotic approach cost-effective. Thus, it is possible that the benefits of robotic surgery may justify investment in this technology.

Using clinical pathways in patients undergoing cardiac valve surgery.

Clinical pathways, protocols, and standing order sets help organize patients' care and eliminate variations created by practitioners' different preferences. Much attention is being focused on providing the most cost-effective care in the shortest time. Quality of care must be maintained during this process. Clinical pathways, protocols, and standing order sets help ensure that care is consistent and quality of care is maintained with the added benefit of a shorter stay in the hospital.

Techniques and results of direct-access minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: a paradigm for the future.

OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to determine whether direct-access minimally invasive mitral valve surgery can improve recovery and cost while maintaining the efficacy of conventional surgery. METHODS: Minimally invasive mitral valve operations were performed on 106 patients, 58% male, average age 58.1 years, with good ventricular function. Ninety underwent repair of a regurgitant, myxomatous valve, and 16 underwent mitral valvuloplasty for prematurely calcified mitral stenosis. The valve was approached with standard instruments through a 5- to 8-cm right parasternal incision. Eighty-five had open femoral artery-femoral vein cannulation, but this technique has recently been replaced by direct cannulation of the aorta and percutaneous cannulation of the femoral vein for most patients. RESULTS: There were no operative deaths. The mean mitral regurgitation score (0-4) decreased from 3.7 to 0.7 after the operation. Although ischemic and bypass times were increased, postoperative recovery was accelerated. Ventilatory support time, intensive care unit stay, hospital stay, need for rehabilitation, and return to "normal activities" all improved. Hospital charges, pain medications, and blood transfusions were also reduced. New atrial fibrillation contributed significantly to increased length of stay and charges. There were no deep wound infections. Other complications included re-exploration for bleeding (n = 1), transient ischemic attacks (n = 2), stroke (n = 1), femoral artery injury (n = 5), pseudoaneurysm (n = 2), and antegrade dissection of the ascending aorta (n = 1). Two patients died and 1 required reoperation during a mean follow-up of 8.8 months. CONCLUSIONS: Direct-access minimally invasive mitral valve surgery can accelerate recovery, decrease charges, and decrease pain, while maintaining overall surgical efficacy. It has become our standard approach for isolated primary mitral valve operations.

[Closed-heart mitral commissurotomy: our experience at the Main Hospital in Dakar]. / La commissurotomie mitrale à coeur fermé: notre expérience à l'Hôpital Principal de Dakar.

Confronted with difficulties of medical evacuation to cardiovascular surgical hospitals in Europe, the authors decided to bring up to date closed heart mitral commissurotomy. The aim of the study was to estimate possibility to select patients, to operate them safety to appreciate the results in medium and short time and the intervention's cost. 8 women and 7 men had a closed heart mitral commissurotomy from June 1995 to January 1997 in Dakar Principal Hospital; inclusion criteria were a symptomatic mitral stenosis with area less 1.5 cm2; exclusion criteria were an other valvulopathy, a Wilkin score above 8, a severe pulmonary arterial hypertension, an auricular thrombosis. One patient died on the forth day; a completely regressive hemiplegia was the only complication; 14 patients were clinically very improved: the average mitral area by planimetry form 0.89 cm2 +/- 0.15 became 1.64 cm2 +/- 0.33 and by Hatle formula from 0.82 cm2 +/- 0.12 to 1.71 cm2 +/- 0.37; the intervention cost was in second class 1,000,000 F CFA, in third class 820,000 F CFA. This study shows closed mitral commissurotomy can be realised in an african hospital as Dakar Principal Hospital; short and medium results are good; African surgeons must go on studying this surgical technic.

Echocardiographic score as a predictor of in-hospital cost in patients undergoing percutaneous balloon mitral valvuloplasty.

Percutaneous balloon mitral valvuloplasty (PBMV) is an effective means of palliating mitral stenosis, but it sometimes leads to adverse clinical outcomes and exorbitant in-hospital costs. Because echocardiographic score is known to be predictive of clinical outcome in patients undergoing PBMV, we examined whether it could also be used to predict in-hospital cost. Preprocedure echocardiographic scores, baseline clinical characteristics, and total in-hospital costs were examined among 45 patients who underwent PBMV between January 1, 1992, and January 1, 1994. Patients ranged in age from 18 to 71 years and had preprocedure echocardiographic scores that ranged from 4 to 12. Following PBMV, mean mitral valve area increased from 1.1 +/- 0.3 to 2.4 +/- 0.6 cm2 (p = 0.0001), and mean pressure gradient decreased from 18.3 +/- 5.9 to 6.7 +/- 2.7 mm Hg (p = 0.0001). In-hospital cost for the 45 patients ranged from $3,591 to $70,975 (mean $9,417; median $5,311). Univariate and multiple linear regression analyses demonstrated that among the variables examined, echocardiographic score (p = 0.0007), age (p = 0.01), and preprocedure mitral valve gradient (p = 0.03) were associated with in-hospital cost. Regression modeling suggested that every increase in preprocedure echocardiographic score of one grade was associated with an increase in in-hospital cost of $2,663. Because echocardiographic score is predictive of both clinical outcome and in-hospital cost, we conclude that patients with elevated scores should be considered for alternative therapy.