Robotic-Assisted Versus Traditional Full-Sternotomy Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Procedures: A Propensity-Matched Analysis of Hospital Costs.

We aim to compare hospital costs of robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) versus conventional CABG. All consecutive 1,173 patients who underwent conventional and robotic-assisted CABG between January 2018 and June 2021 were included. After propensity-matching, 267 patients in each group (robotic-assisted vs conventional) were included in the study. Patient selection for each group was decided by a treating surgeon with a heart team based on clinical factors. Syntax score was not assessed. Total costs (direct + indirect hospital costs) of patients who underwent robotic-assisted and conventional CABG were compared. Direct cost expenses included surgical operating time, hospital stay, surgical implants and supplies, catheterization laboratory, pharmacy, radiology and ultrasound imaging, blood bank, cardiology, and so on. Indirect cost expenses included general administration medical records, and so on. Using the propensity-matched groups (n = 267), we summed the total cost by year. Results for 267 propensity-matched patients (each group) evidenced that total conventional CABG costs were $9.5 million (average of $35,580/patient), whereas robotic-assisted CABG costs were $5 million ($18,726/patient). Therefore, the differences between robotic-assisted and conventional CABG costs were $4.5 million ($16,853/patient), favoring robotic-assisted over conventional CABG. Differences in direct and indirect costs were $2.2 million and $1.8 million, respectively. When the cost of the Da Vinci robot was added ($1,200,000), the total cost was $3.3 million ($12,359 × patient) lower in the robotic-assisted CABG group. Multivariate analysis showed that, mainly, the shorter hospital length of stay (7 vs 5 days) accounts for the reduced costs observed in the robotic-assisted CABG group. In conclusion, in a mature practice, robotic-assisted CABG decreases hospital length of stay, leading to reduced hospital costs compared with conventional CABG.

Preoperative assessment of the technical complexity of minimally invasive aortic root repair.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess predictors of technical complexity of minimally invasive aortic root repairs (MIARR) performed through J-shaped mini-sternotomies in patients with aortic root aneurysm. METHODS: This study included 49 patients with aortic root aneurysm who underwent MIARR via an upper median J-shaped mini-sternotomy between January 2017 and April 2020. Preoperative high-resolution computed tomographic images synchronised with electrocardiography were mandatory for inclusion. Predictors of technical complexity were identified, and a scoring system was created. The correlation between technical complexity and intraoperative/postoperative parameters was explored. RESULTS: There was a significant association between technical complexity and increased procedure time (Spearmen's ρ=-0.45, P=0.001), blood loss (Spearmen's ρ=-0.384, P=0.006), cardiopulmonary bypass time (Spearmen's ρ=-0.301, P=0.035), and postoperative bleeding (Spearmen's ρ=-0.265, P=0.066). The anatomical aorta-sternal relationship (distance of >22.1 mm in the axial plane between the midline of the sternotomy plane and the left coronary), distance between the sternal notch and the aortic valve annulus (>14.5 cm in the sagittal plane), distance between the skin and the left coronary artery (>9.53 cm in the axial plane), obesity (Body Mass Index >30), and-diameter at the brachiocephalic trunk level (>37 mm), were strongly associated with procedural complexity. Overall test accuracy was 75.5%, sensitivity was 73.1%, and specificity 78.3%. Finally, we created an online calculator that surgeons can use to determine the probability of a technically difficult of MIARR based on these factors. CONCLUSIONS: This novel scoring system can be used to assess the technical complexity of minimally invasive aortic root repairs and to aid in preoperative planning.

Multicenter assessment of the outcomes of subcutaneous ICD implantation in patients with prior or future sternotomy.

BACKGROUND: The subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD) is a viable alternative to transvenous ICD and avoids intravascular complications in patients without a pacing indication. The outcomes of S-ICD implantation are uncertain in patients with prior sternotomy. OBJECTIVE: We aim to compare the implant techniques and outcomes with S-ICD implantation in patients with and without prior sternotomy. METHODS: Multicenter retrospective cohort study including adult patients with an S-ICD implanted between January 2014 and June 2020. Outcomes were compared between patients with and without prior sternotomy. RESULTS: Among the 212 patients (49 ± 15 years old, 43% women, BMI 30 ± 8 kg/m2 , 68% primary prevention, 30% ischemic cardiomyopathy, LVEF median 30% IQR 25%-45%) who underwent S-ICD implantation, 47 (22%) had a prior sternotomy. There was no difference in the sensing vector (57% vs. 53% primary, p = 0.55), laterality of the S-ICD lead to the sternum (94% vs. 96% leftward, p = 0.54), or the defibrillation threshold (65 ± 1.4 J vs. 65 ± 0.8 J, p = 0.76) with versus without prior sternotomy. The frequency of 30-day complications was similar with and without prior sternotomy (n = 3/47 vs. n = 15/165, 6% vs. 9%, p = 0.56). Over a median follow-up of 28 months (IQR 10-49 months), the frequency of inappropriate shocks was similar between those with and without prior sternotomy (n = 3/47 and n = 16/165, 6% vs. 10%, p = 0.58). CONCLUSION: Implantation of an S-ICD in patients with prior sternotomy is safe with a similar risk of 30-day complications and inappropriate ICD shocks as patients without prior sternotomy.

Clinical and economic outcomes after sternotomy for cardiac surgery with skin closure through 2-octyl cyanoacrylate plus polymer mesh tape versus absorbable sutures plus waterproof wound dressings: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: To compare clinical and economic outcomes after sternotomy for cardiac surgery with skin closure through 2-octyl cyanoacrylate plus polymer mesh tape (2OPMT) versus conventional absorbable sutures plus waterproof wound dressings (CSWWD). METHODS: Retrospective study using the Premier Healthcare Database. Patients undergoing a cardiac surgery requiring sternotomy with 2OPMT or CSWWD were included. Primary outcome was 60-day cumulative incidence of diagnosis for wound complications (infection, dehiscence). Secondary outcomes were index admission hospital length of stay (LOS), total hospital-borne costs, discharge status, and 60-day cumulative incidences of inpatient readmission and reoperation. After propensity score matching, outcomes were compared between the 2OPMT and CSWWD groups using bivariate multilevel mixed-effects generalized linear models. RESULTS: Overall, 7,901 2OPMT patients and 10,775 CSWWD patients were eligible for study. After propensity score matching on 68 variables, each group comprised 5,338 patients (total study N = 10,676). The 2OPMT and CSWWD groups did not differ significantly in terms of the 60-day cumulative incidences of wound complication (3.47% vs 3.47%, p = 0.996), inpatient readmission (12.6% vs. 13.6%, p = 0.354), and reoperation (10.3% vs 10.1%, p = 0.808), as well as discharge to home versus non-home setting (77.2% vs. 75.1%), p = 0.254. However, the 2OPMT group had significantly lower LOS (9.2 days vs 10.6 days, p < 0.001) and total hospital-borne costs ($50,174 vs $60,526, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This large observational study provides evidence that sternotomy skin closure with 2OPMT is associated with nearly identical 60-day cumulative incidence of wound complication as compared with CSWWD, while exhibiting a significant association with lower LOS and total hospital-borne costs. Trial registration Not applicable.

Acute Kidney Injury: Lessons from Pericardiectomy.

BACKGROUND: Acute kidney (renal) injury (AKI) is a severe and common complication that occurs in ~40% of patients undergoing cardiac surgery. AKI has been associated with increased mortality and worse prognosis. This prospective study was conducted to determine the risk factors for AKI after pericardiectomy and decrease the operative risk of mortality and morbidity. METHODS: This was a prospective, observational cohort study of patients with constrictive pericarditis undergoing pericardiectomy. All patients underwent pericardiectomy via median sternotomy. Serum creatinine was used as the diagnostic standard of AKI according to Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes classification. All survivors were monitored to the end date of the study. RESULTS: Consecutive patients (N = 92) undergoing pericardiectomy were divided into 2 groups: with AKI (n = 25) and without AKI (n = 67). The incidence of postoperative AKI was 27.2% (25/92). Hemodialysis was required for 10 patients (40%), and there were 5 operative deaths. Mortality, intubation time, time in intensive care unit, fresh-frozen plasma, and packed red cells of the group with AKI were significantly higher than those of the group without AKI. Both univariate and multivariate analyses showed that statistically significant independent predictors of AKI include intubation time, chest drainage, fresh-frozen plasma, and packed red cells. The latest follow-up data showed that 85 survivors were New York Heart Association class I (97.7%) and 2 were class II (2.3%). CONCLUSIONS: AKI after pericardiectomy is a serious complication and contributes to significantly increased morbidity and mortality. Prevention of AKI development after cardiac surgery and optimization of pre-, peri-, and postoperative factors that can reduce AKI, therefore, contribute to a better postoperative outcome and leads to lower rates of AKI, morbidity, and mortality.

Minimally Invasive vs Open Coronary Surgery: A Multi-Institutional Analysis of Cost and Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Limited multi-institutional data evaluating minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) outcomes have raised concern for increased resource utilization compared with standard sternotomy. The purpose of this study was to assess short-term outcomes and resource utilization with MICS CABG in a propensity-matched regional cohort. METHODS: Isolated CABG patients (2012-2019) were extracted from a regional Society of Thoracic Surgeons database. Patients were stratified by MICS CABG vs open CABG via sternotomy, propensity-score matched 1:2 to balance baseline differences, and compared by univariate analysis. RESULTS: Of 26,255 isolated coronary artery bypass graft patients, 139 MICS CABG and 278 open CABG patients were well balanced after matching. There was no difference in the operative mortality rate (2.2% open vs 0.7% MICS CABG, P = .383) or major morbidity (7.9% open vs 7.2% MICS CABG, P = .795). However, open CABG patients received more blood products (22.2% vs 12.2%, P = .013), and had longer intensive care unit (45 vs 30 hours, P = .049) as well as hospital lengths of stay (7 vs 6 days, P = .005). Finally, median hospital cost was significantly higher in the open CABG group ($35,011 vs $27,906, P < .001) compared with MICS CABG. CONCLUSIONS: Open CABG via sternotomy and MICS CABG approaches are associated with similar, excellent perioperative outcomes. However, MICS CABG was associated with fewer transfusions, shorter length of stay, and ∼$7000 lower hospital cost, a superior resource utilization profile that improves patient care and lowers cost.

Long-Term Metabolic Assessment of Cryopreserved Sternal Allograft: A Case Series.

BACKGROUND: Sternal resection and reconstruction with cryopreserved allografts provides a safe alternative to traditional methods of anterior chest wall reconstruction. Despite favorable results, successful integration of the graft sternum has never been demonstrated owing to the invasiveness of bone biopsy. We describe our experience of using 18F-sodium fluoride positron emission tomography/computed tomography scans as a noninvasive method of evaluating graft integration. METHODS: Seven patients underwent surgery and radiologic follow-up. Surgical indications were sternal metastases (n = 5) and sternal dehiscence (n = 2). Sternal reconstruction was performed using a cryopreserved cadaveric sternal allograft fixed in place with titanium plates and screws. Follow-up with 18F-sodium fluoride positron emission tomography/computed tomography scans was performed at 1 and 2 years after surgery. RESULTS: Three patients underwent total sternectomy. Two underwent partial upper sternectomy involving the manubrium, clavicle (1 patient only), and upper sternal body; and 2 had partial sternectomy of the sternal body and xiphoid process. Focal tracer accumulation occurred at the junctions between native bone and graft bone. The median maximum standardized uptake value at 1 year was 16.8 (range, 11.2 to 37.9; interquartile range, 13.6 to 19.4), and at 2 years it was 10.8 (range, 6.1 to 30.2; interquartile range, 8.9 to 15.1). In 6 cases accumulation was lower at the second scan, whereas in 1 patient the accumulation was higher at the second scan. CONCLUSIONS: Sternal reconstruction with cryopreserved allograft is safe and well tolerated. The 18F-sodium fluoride positron emission tomography/computed tomography scans are a useful and promising noninvasive method of demonstrating the metabolic activity of the graft and its incorporation into the host skeleton during follow-up.

Preoperative Arterial and Venous Cannulation in Redo Cardiac Surgery: From the Safety and Cost-effectiveness Points of View.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety and cost-effectiveness of preoperative cannulation and conventional approach techniques. METHODS: Sixty-one patients who underwent redo open cardiac procedures between September 2015 and November 2018 were divided into two groups - Group A (n: 30), patients who underwent conventional cannulation after sternotomy, and Group B (n: 31), those who underwent cannulation before sternotomy. Patients were evaluated retrospectively for general complication rates and total hospital costs. RESULTS: Mortality occurred in four patients from Group A and in one patient from Group B. Four patients required extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in Group A, whereas two required ECMO in Group B. Duration of total operation, cardiopulmonary bypass, and cross-clamp times were longer in the conventional surgery group than in the pre-sternotomy cannulation group (420.29±188.84 vs. 314.77±187.38, P=0.036; 171.87±85.59 vs. 141.7±82.47, P=0.089; and 102.94±70.67 vs. 60.97±52.81, P=0.009; respectively). Total blood and blood product usage were higher in Group A than in Group B. Postoperative intensive care unit stay was 62.77±145.3 hours vs. 25.13±73.11 hours, ventilation time was 5.16±5.09 hours vs. 3.03±2.78 hours, duration of ward stay was 5.23±2.52 days vs. 5.57±2.16 days, and duration of hospital stay was 9.58±5.85 days vs. 9.8±5.31 days in conventional sternotomy and pre-sternotomy cannulation groups, respectively. Total hospital costs were calculated 35863.52±20803.99 Turkish Liras (TL) in Group A and 25744.74±16472.03 TL in Group B (P=0,042). CONCLUSION: Venous and arterial cannulations before sternotomy decreased myocardial injury and complication rates, blood and blood product usage, hospital stay, and, consequently, hospital costs in our modest cohort.

Preoperative arterial and venous cannulation in redo cardiac surgery: from the safety and cost-effectiveness points of view

Abstract Objective: To investigate the safety and cost-effectiveness of preoperative cannulation and conventional approach techniques. Methods: Sixty-one patients who underwent redo open cardiac procedures between September 2015 and November 2018 were divided into two groups - Group A (n: 30), patients who underwent conventional cannulation after sternotomy, and Group B (n: 31), those who underwent cannulation before sternotomy. Patients were evaluated retrospectively for general complication rates and total hospital costs. Results: Mortality occurred in four patients from Group A and in one patient from Group B. Four patients required extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in Group A, whereas two required ECMO in Group B. Duration of total operation, cardiopulmonary bypass, and cross-clamp times were longer in the conventional surgery group than in the pre-sternotomy cannulation group (420.29±188.84 vs. 314.77±187.38, P=0.036; 171.87±85.59 vs. 141.7±82.47, P=0.089; and 102.94±70.67 vs. 60.97±52.81, P=0.009; respectively). Total blood and blood product usage were higher in Group A than in Group B. Postoperative intensive care unit stay was 62.77±145.3 hours vs. 25.13±73.11 hours, ventilation time was 5.16±5.09 hours vs. 3.03±2.78 hours, duration of ward stay was 5.23±2.52 days vs. 5.57±2.16 days, and duration of hospital stay was 9.58±5.85 days vs. 9.8±5.31 days in conventional sternotomy and pre-sternotomy cannulation groups, respectively. Total hospital costs were calculated 35863.52±20803.99 Turkish Liras (TL) in Group A and 25744.74±16472.03 TL in Group B (P=0,042). Conclusion: Venous and arterial cannulations before sternotomy decreased myocardial injury and complication rates, blood and blood product usage, hospital stay, and, consequently, hospital costs in our modest cohort.

Routine vocal cord mobility assessment post cardiac surgery via median sternotomy approach.

OBJECTIVES: Surgery of the aortic arch carries a risk of injury to the vagus and recurrent laryngeal nerves, particularly in a young child, as these structures lie in close proximity to aortic arch. This study aimed to determine the incidence, symptomatology and natural history of vocal cord dysfunction (VCD) following aortic arch reconstructive surgery through a median sternotomy approach. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Prospective assessment was performed of all consecutive newborns who underwent cardiac surgery for aortic arch surgery via median sternotomy between January 2016 and May 2017 at a tertiary paediatric hospital. All patients underwent post-operative flexible fibreoptic nasolaryngoscopy (FNL) after extubation to assess for the presence of vocal cord dysfunction (VCD). Those with VCD were re-examined at followup. A feeding assessment performed by speech pathologists (SPs) and a video fluoroscopic swallow study (VFSS) were also performed in those with VCD or feeding difficulties. RESULTS: A total of 35 newborns were included in the study. At initial review, left sided VCD was demonstrated in 65.7% of patients (n=23). Significant associations with VCD were younger age (3.0 versus 6.5 days, p=0.041) and a weak or absent cry (Relative Risk=16.4, 95%CI 3.8-47.8, p<0.001). 52.5% (n=11) of patients with VCD had evidence of aspiration on VFSS. There was no significant difference in intensive care unit stay or overall hospital stay between patients with VCD compared to those without (33.0 days vs 28.8 days, p=0.73; 52.5 vs 45.9, p=0.72.) Infants with either proven VCD or a weak cry were more likely to be discharged home with a nasogastric (NG) tube (RR=4.67, p= 0.048; RR=7.00 p=0.022 respectively). At followup after 106 days, complete resolution was seen in 100% patients with partial VCD and 61.5% with complete VCD. CONCLUSIONS: VCD is a common complication following neonatal aortic arch surgery, although most experience resolution of symptoms over time. The authors recommend post-operative laryngoscopy in all patients should be routine, and particularly those with a weak cry.

Cost of Thoracotomy Approach: An Analysis of the LATERAL Trial.

BACKGROUND: Less invasive techniques for left ventricular assist device implantation have been increasingly prevalent over past years and have been associated with improved clinical outcomes. The procedural economic impact of these techniques remains unknown. We sought to study and report economic outcomes associated with the thoracotomy implantation approach. METHODS: The LATERAL clinical trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of the thoracotomy approach for implantation of the HeartWare centrifugal-flow ventricular assist device system (HVAD). We collected UB-04 forms in parallel to the trial, allowing analysis of index hospitalization costs. All charges were converted to costs using hospital-specific cost-to-charge ratios and were subsequently compared with Medicare cost data for the same period (2015-2016). Because thoracotomy implants were off-label for all left ventricular assist devices during that period, the Medicare cohort was assumed to consist predominately of traditional sternotomy patients. RESULTS: Thoracotomy patients demonstrated decreased costs compared with sternotomy patients during the index hospitalization. Mean total index hospitalization costs for thoracotomy were $204,107 per patient, corresponding to 21.6% reduction (P < .001) and $56,385 savings per procedure compared with sternotomy. Across almost all cost categories, thoracotomy implants were less costly. CONCLUSIONS: In LATERAL, a clinical trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of the thoracotomy approach for HVAD, costs were lower than those reported in Medicare patient claims occurring over the same period. Because Medicare data can be presumed to consist of predominately sternotomy procedures, thoracotomy appears less expensive than traditional sternotomy.

Transcervical Thymectomy Is the Most Cost-Effective Surgical Approach in Myasthenia Gravis.

BACKGROUND: Extended thymectomy has been proven to improve the course of myasthenia gravis. Retrospective studies demonstrate that several techniques for thymectomy achieve overlapping remission rates. We therefore compared perioperative outcomes and costs among 3 approaches to thymectomy: sternotomy, video and/or robot assisted, and transcervical. METHODS: To ensure similar study groups, we excluded patients with >4 cm or invasive tumors and those who underwent less than an extended thymectomy or concurrent procedures. Hospital costs were collected and analyzed by blinded finance personnel. RESULTS: The final study group consisted of 25 transcervical, 23 video/robot-assisted, and 14 sternotomy subjects. There was a higher incidence of myasthenia gravis in the transcervical and sternotomy groups (P < 0.001) and of thymoma in the video/robot-assisted and sternotomy groups (P = .002). Mean modified Charlson comorbidity score was higher for sternotomy (2.7 ± 2.1, mean ± SD) than transcervical (1.00 ± 0.58; P < .001) and video/robot-assisted (1.13 ± 0.97; P = .001) procedures. There was no difference in complication rates between approaches (P = 0.828). The cost of transcervical thymectomy was 45% of the cost of sternotomy (P < .001), and was 58% of the cost of video/robot-assisted (P = .018) approaches; these differences remained highly significant on multivariate analysis. Transcervical thymectomy had a shorter mean length of stay (1.2 ± 0.5 days) than median sternotomy (4.4 ± 3.5; P < .001), and video/robot-assisted thymectomy (2.4 ± 0.95; P = .045) and "bed cost" were major contributors to the cost difference between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Transcervical thymectomy, which provides overlapping myasthenia gravis remission rates versus more invasive approaches, is equally safe and far less costly than sternotomy and video/robot-assisted approaches.

Low-Computational Cost Stitching Method in a Three-Eyed Endoscope.

Aortic valve replacement is the only definitive treatment for aortic stenosis, a highly prevalent condition in elderly population. Minimally invasive surgery brought numerous benefits to this intervention, and robotics recently provided additional improvements in terms of telemanipulation, motion scaling, and smaller incisions. Difficulties in obtaining a clear and wide field of vision is a major challenge in minimally invasive aortic valve surgery: surgeon orientates with difficulty because of lack of direct view and limited spaces. This work focuses on the development of a computer vision methodology, for a three-eyed endoscopic vision system, to ease minimally invasive instrument guidance during aortic valve surgery. Specifically, it presents an efficient image stitching method to improve spatial awareness and overcome the orientation problems which arise when cameras are decentralized with respect to the main axis of the aorta and are nonparallel oriented. The proposed approach was tested for the navigation of an innovative robotic system for minimally invasive valve surgery. Based on the specific geometry of the setup and the intrinsic parameters of the three cameras, we estimate the proper plane-induced homographic transformation that merges the views of the operatory site plane into a single stitched image. To evaluate the deviation from the image correct alignment, we performed quantitative tests by stitching a chessboard pattern. The tests showed a minimum error with respect to the image size of 0.46 ± 0.15% measured at the homography distance of 40 mm and a maximum error of 6.09 ± 0.23% at the maximum offset of 10 mm. Three experienced surgeons in aortic valve replacement by mini-sternotomy and mini-thoracotomy performed experimental tests based on the comparison of navigation and orientation capabilities in a silicone aorta with and without stitched image. The tests showed that the stitched image allows for good orientation and navigation within the aorta, and furthermore, it provides more safety while releasing the valve than driving from the three separate views. The average processing time for the stitching of three views into one image is 12.6 ms, proving that the method is not computationally expensive, thus leaving space for further real-time processing.

Cost-Effectiveness of Negative Pressure Incision Management System in Cardiac Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Sternal wound infections (SWIs) can be a devastating long-term complication with significant morbidity and health care cost. The purpose of this analysis was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of negative pressure incision management systems (NPIMS) in cardiac surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All cardiac surgery cases at an academic hospital with risk scores available (2009-2017) were extracted from an institutional database (n = 4455). Patients were stratified by utilization of NPIMS, and high risk was defined as above the median. Costs included infection-related readmissions and were adjusted for inflation. Multivariable regression models assessed the risk-adjusted cost of SWI and efficacy of NPIMS use. Cost-effectiveness was modeled using TreeAge Pro using institutional results. RESULTS: The rate of deep SWI was 0.9% with an estimated cost of $111,175 (P < 0.0001). The rate of superficial SWI was 0.8% at a cost of $7981 (P = 0.08). Risk-adjusted NPIMS use was not significantly associated with reduced SWI (OR 1.2, P = 0.62) and thus not cost-effective. However, in the high-risk cohort with an OR 0.84 (P = 0.72) and SWI rate of 2.3%, NPIMS use cost $205 per patient with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $179,092. Therefore, NPIMS is estimated to be cost-effective with a deep SWI rate over 1.3% or improved efficacy (OR < 0.83). CONCLUSIONS: SWIs are extremely expensive complications with estimates of $111,175 for deep yet only $7981 for superficial. Although NPIMS was not cost-effective for SWI prevention as currently utilized, a protocol for use on patients with a higher risk of sternal infection could be cost-effective.

Mini-Stern Trial: A randomized trial comparing mini-sternotomy to full median sternotomy for aortic valve replacement.

OBJECTIVE: Aortic valve replacement (AVR) can be performed either through full median sternotomy (FS) or upper mini-sternotomy (MS). The Mini-Stern trial aimed to establish whether MS leads to quicker postoperative recovery and shorter hospital stay after first-time isolated AVR. METHODS: This pragmatic, open-label, parallel randomized controlled trial (RCT) compared MS with FS for first-time isolated AVR in 2 United Kingdom National Health Service hospitals. Primary endpoints were duration of postoperative hospital stay and the time to fitness for discharge from hospital after AVR, analyzed in the intent-to-treat population. RESULTS: In this RCT, 222 patients were recruited and randomized (n = 118 in the MS group; n = 104 in the FS group). Compared with the FS group, the MS group had a longer hospital length of stay (mean, 9.5 days vs 8.6 days) and took longer to achieve fitness for discharge home (mean, 8.5 days vs 7.5 days). Adjusting for valve type, sex, and surgeon, hazard ratios (HRs) from Cox models did not show a statistically significant effect of MS (relative to FS) on either hospital stay (HR, 0.874; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.668-1.143; P = .3246) or time to fitness for discharge (HR, 0.907; 95% CI, 0.688-1.197; P value = .4914). During a mean follow-up of 760 days (745 days for the MS group and 777 days for the FS group), 12 patients (10%) in the MS group and 7 patients (7%) in the FS group died (HR, 1.871; 95% CI, 0.723-4.844; P = .1966). Average extra cost for MS was £1714 during the first 12 months after AVR. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with FS for AVR, MS did not result in shorter hospital stay, faster recovery, or improved survival and was not cost-effective. The MS approach is not superior to FS for performing AVR.

Automated Titanium Fasteners Versus Hand-Tied Knots: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: The relative benefits of automated titanium fasteners (LSI Solutions, Victor, NY) have not been examined in patients undergoing sternotomy. The aim of this study was to assess the time and cost required for suture fixation with the automated device versus conventional hand tying in sternotomy for mitral or tricuspid ring annuloplasty. METHODS: Fifty patients scheduled to undergo primary mitral or tricuspid, or both, ring annuloplasty-based valve repair operation by a single surgeon were randomly assigned to receive either conventional hand-tied knots or automated titanium fasteners, with 25 patients in each group. The primary outcome variable was the time required to affix the annuloplasty device to the valve annulus. RESULTS: The times taken to affix a mitral annuloplasty band or ring were 6.1 ± 0.9 min for manual tying versus 3.1 ± 0.4 min for automated fasteners (p < 0.0001); when calculated per annuloplasty stitch, the values were 22 ± 2 s versus 12 ± 1.1 s, respectively (p < 0.0001). The corresponding values for tricuspid annuloplasty were 4.2 ± 1.2 min (hand tying) versus 2.2 ± 0.3 min (automated fasteners) (p = 0.0005), and the times for each suture were 20 ± 2.1 s versus 13 ± 2 s, respectively (p = 0.0004). The use of the automated fastener had no significant impact on aortic cross-clamp time or cardiopulmonary bypass duration. Total cost associated with annuloplasty fixation with automated titanium fasteners (device cost in addition to operating room time cost) was significantly higher than with hand tying ($1,190 ± 374 vs $164 ± 60; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Using the automated fastener to facilitate annuloplasty fixation through a sternotomy resulted in a small procedural time savings (average of 10 s/stitch) that had no overall impact on cardiopulmonary bypass or cross-clamp times but added an average cost of $1,026 to the operation.

Robotic mitral valve operations by experienced surgeons are cost-neutral and durable at 1 year.

BACKGROUND: Robotic mitral valve surgery has potential advantages in patient satisfaction and 30-day outcome. Cost concerns and repair durability limit wider adoption of robotic technology. This study examined detailed cost differences between robotic and sternotomy techniques in relation to outcomes and durability following robotic mitral program initiation. METHODS: Between April 2013 and October 2015, 30-day and 1-year outcomes of 328 consecutive patients undergoing robotic or sternotomy mitral valve repair or replacement by experienced surgeons were examined. Multivariable logistic regression informed propensity matching to derive a cohort of 182 patients. Echocardiographic follow-up was completed at 1 year in all robotic patients. Detailed activity-based cost accounting was applied to include direct, semidirect, and indirect costs with special respect to robotic depreciation, maintenance, and supplies. A quantitative analysis of all hospital costs was applied directly to each patient encounter for comparative financial analyses. RESULTS: Mean predicted risk of mortality was similar in both the robotic (n = 91) and sternotomy (n = 91) groups (0.9% vs 0.8%; P > .431). The total costs of robotic mitral operations were similar to those of sternotomy ($27,662 vs $28,241; P = .273). Early direct costs were higher in the robotic group. There was a marked increase in late indirect cost with the sternotomy cohort related to increased length of stay, transfusion requirements, and readmission rates. Robotic repair technique was associated with no echocardiographic recurrence greater than trace to only mild regurgitation at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Experienced mitral surgeons can initiate a robotic program in a cost-neutral manner that maintains clinical outcome integrity as well as repair durability.