Stimulant prodrugs: A pharmacological and clinical assessment of their role in treating ADHD and binge-eating disorder.

In this review, we critically evaluate the contribution of prodrugs to treating two related psychiatric disorders, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and binge-eating disorder (BED). ADHD is characterized by inattentiveness, distractibility, impulsiveness, and hyperactivity. BED is also an impulse-control disorder which leads to frequent, compulsive episodes of excessive eating (binges). Lisdexamfetamine (LDX; prodrug of d-amphetamine) is approved to treat both ADHD and BED. Serdexmethylphenidate (SDX; prodrug of d-threo-methylphenidate) is not clinically approved as monotherapy but, in a fixed-dose combination with immediate release d-threo-methylphenidate (Azstarys™), SDX is approved for managing ADHD in children/adolescents. The pharmacological actions of a stimulant mediate both its efficacy and side-effects. Therefore, daily management of ADHD or BED to maintain optimum efficacy and tolerability places highly restrictive requirements on the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) characteristics of stimulant medications, especially prodrugs. Prodrugs must have good bioavailability and rapid metabolism to provide therapeutic efficacy soon after morning dosing combined with providing stimulant coverage throughout the day/evening. A wide selection of dosages and linear PK for the prodrug and its active metabolite are essential requirements for treatment of these conditions. The proposed neurobiological causes of ADHD and BED are described. The chemical, pharmacological and PK/PD properties responsible for the therapeutic actions of the prodrugs, LDX and SDX, are compared and contrasted. Finally, we critically assess their contribution as ADHD and BED medications, including advantages over their respective active metabolites, d-amphetamine and d-threo-methylphenidate, and also their potential for misuse and abuse.

Stimulant Patterns, Alone or with Other Psychotropic Classes, in Medicaid-Insured Youth Continuously Enrolled for 3-8 Years.

Objective: Little U.S. pharmacoepidemiologic study is based on treatment during continuous enrollment for periods more than a year. This study aims to show pediatric patterns of stimulant use (alone or with other psychotropic classes) from Medicaid administrative claims data for stimulant patterns of 3- to 8-year continuous enrollees. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was derived from Medicaid enrollment, pharmacy, and diagnosis claims data (2007-2014) in a mid-Atlantic state. Youth aged 2-17 years with 3-8 years of continuous enrollment treated with stimulants were compared with a date-matched comparison group treated without stimulants. Major outcomes include prevalence and duration of stimulant use and patterns of stimulant polypharmacy across relatively long enrollments (3-8 years). Results: Among 264,518 unique 2- to 17-year olds with 3-8 years of continuous enrollment, 16.5% had stimulant prescription dispensings, doubling the annual national prevalence of 8.1%. Subgroup analysis showed that the highest prevalence of stimulant use was for 6- to 11-year olds (20.4%), foster care eligible youth (42.3%), and those with 7-8 years of continuous enrollment (20.1%). Externalizing psychiatric disorders were far more common in those treated with stimulants than in those treated without stimulants. The duration of stimulant exposure overall was a median of 487 days, half that of foster care stimulant users. Stimulant polypharmacy with two or more psychotropic classes concomitantly characterized 29.8% of stimulant users. Among those with three or four or more class polypharmacy, 85% and 88%, respectively, had concomitant stimulant and antipsychotic use. The adjusted odds ratio (AOR) of three or more class polypharmacy significantly increased in 12- to 17-year-old age group (AOR = 1.8), foster care eligibility (AOR = 4.5), and among those with the longest enrollment (AOR = 1.7). Conclusions and Relevance: Stimulant prevalence in Medicaid-insured youth with continuous enrollment of 3-8 years was twice as common as in annual data sets. Future research should investigate three to five interclass stimulant polypharmacy effectiveness in reliably diagnosed community populations.

An Objective Assessment of Effect of Stimulants on Attention in Individuals With ADHD.

INTRODUCTION: Currently, assessing ADHD treatment response to stimulants relies on rating scales and subjective questionnaires and sometimes a CPT. Such tools fall short of objective, quantifiable measurement of effect, especially in natural settings and can result in inconsistent treatment. METHOD: We report results from two studies using a novel proof-of-concept approach. A preliminary trial of 10 individuals used a high-fidelity eye tracker; a second study of 100 individuals used webcams at the participants' homes. RESULTS: Both studies evaluated stimulant effect using reading behavior analysis, being an ADHD symptom that stimulants affect and a major symptom patients want to improve. Both showed a significant change in reading behavior related to medication state, suggesting a clear, objective measure of stimulant effect. CONCLUSION: Using ubiquitous hardware, investigators created a user-friendly treatment assessment platform where individuals can collect their own objective data within minutes in any setting where they have access to a web camera and computer.

Efficacy of methylphenidate treatment in childhood myotonic dystrophy type 1 and comorbid attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: A case report using eye tracking assessment.

INTRODUCTION: Despite the increased prevalence of comorbid attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children with myotonic dystrophy type 1, the effects of methylphenidate treatment on associated cognitive deficits in this population is not yet investigated. CASE: We describe a case study of an eleven-year-old male patient with myotonic dystrophy type 1 and comorbid ADHD that was treated with methylphenidate in a twice daily regime (0.60 mg/kg/day). Positive effects on learning and cognition were reported by the parents and teachers. No negative side effects were reported. Sequential neuropsychological assessments before and 45 minutes after methylphenidate intake were conducted to quantify the cognitive effects of methylphenidate treatment. Significant improvements in regulation of attention were behaviorally observed and were quantified using eye tracking technology. CONCLUSION: We conclude that methylphenidate may be an effective treatment for ADHD-related cognitive deficits and learning difficulties in children with myotonic dystrophy type 1 which merits further research.

Adherence to Clinical Guidelines for Dose Finding and Monitoring Methylphenidate Use: A Medical Record Audit in Child and Adolescent Mental Health Care and Pediatric Settings.

Background: Guideline adherence is important to ensure optimal and safe use of methylphenidate for children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). We investigated adherence to Dutch guidelines regarding dosing and monitoring of methylphenidate in child and adolescent mental health care and pediatric treatment settings. Methods: Five hundred six medical records of children and adolescents were investigated in 2015 and 2016. We assessed adherence to the following guideline recommendations: (1) at least four visits during the dose-finding phase; (2) monitoring thereafter at least every 6 months; (3) measuring height and weight at least annually; and (4) the use of validated questionnaires to assess treatment response. Pearson's chi-squared test statistics were used to examine differences between settings. Results: Only a small portion of patients had at least four visits during the dose-finding phase (5.1% in the first 4 weeks to 12.4% in the first 6 weeks). Also, less than half of the patients (48.4%) were seen at least every 6 months. Height was recorded at least annually in 42.0% of patients, weight in 44.9%, and both recorded in a growth chart in 19.5%. Questionnaires to assess treatment response were only used in 2.3% of all visits. When comparing both settings, more patients in the pediatric settings were seen every 6 months, although height and weight were recorded more often in the mental health care setting. Conclusion: Overall, guideline adherence was low. Training of clinicians and adding guideline recommendations to electronic medical records templates may improve adherence. Additionally, we should aim to close the gap between guidelines and clinical practice by looking critically at the feasibility of guidelines.

Cost consequence analysis of Apathy in Dementia Methylphenidate Trial 2 (ADMET 2).

BACKGROUND: This paper used data from the Apathy in Dementia Methylphenidate Trial 2 (NCT02346201) to conduct a planned cost consequence analysis to investigate whether treatment of apathy with methylphenidate is economically attractive. METHODS: A total of 167 patients with clinically significant apathy randomized to either methylphenidate or placebo were included. The Resource Utilization in Dementia Lite instrument assessed resource utilization for the past 30 days and the EuroQol five dimension five level questionnaire assessed health utility at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. Resources were converted to costs using standard sources and reported in 2021 USD. A repeated measures analysis of variance compared change in costs and utility over time between the treatment and placebo groups. A binary logistic regression was used to assess cost predictors. RESULTS: Costs were not significantly different between groups whether the cost of methylphenidate was excluded (F(2,330) = 0.626, ηp2 = 0.004, p = 0.535) or included (F(2,330) = 0.629, ηp2 = 0.004, p = 0.534). Utility improved with methylphenidate treatment as there was a group by time interaction (F(2,330) = 7.525, ηp2 = 0.044, p < 0.001). DISCUSSION: Results from this study indicated that there was no evidence for a difference in resource utilization costs between methylphenidate and placebo treatment. However, utility improved significantly over the 6-month follow-up period. These results can aid in decision-making to improve quality of life in patients with Alzheimer's disease while considering the burden on the healthcare system.

Prescription Stimulant Medical and Nonmedical Use Among US Secondary School Students, 2005 to 2020.

Importance: Recent information on the prevalence of prescription stimulant therapy for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and nonmedical use of prescription stimulants (NUPS) at the school-level among US secondary school students is limited. Objective: To investigate the school-level prevalence of and association between stimulant therapy for ADHD and NUPS among US secondary school students. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used survey data collected between 2005 and 2020 as part of the Monitoring the Future study (data collected annually via self-administered survey in schools from independent cohorts). Participants were from a nationally representative sample of 3284 US secondary schools. The mean (SD) response rates were 89.5% (1.3%) for 8th-grade students, 87.4% (1.1%) for 10th-grade students, and 81.5% (1.8%) for 12th-grade students. Statistical analysis was performed from July to September 2022. Main Outcome and Measure: Past-year NUPS. Results: The 3284 schools contained 231 141 US 8th-, 10th-, and 12th-grade students (111 864 [50.8%, weighted] female; 27 234 [11.8%, weighted] Black, 37 400 [16.2%, weighted] Hispanic, 122 661 [53.1%, weighted] White, 43 846 [19.0%, weighted] other race and ethnicity). Across US secondary schools, the past-year prevalence of NUPS ranged from 0% to more than 25%. The adjusted odds of an individual engaging in past-year NUPS were higher at secondary schools with higher proportions of students who reported stimulant therapy for ADHD, after controlling for other individual-level and school-level covariates. Students attending schools with the highest rates of prescription stimulant therapy for ADHD had approximately 36% increased odds of past-year NUPS compared with students attending schools with no medical use of prescription stimulants (adjusted odds ratio, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.20-1.55). Other significant school-level risk factors included schools in more recent cohorts (2015-2020), schools with higher proportions of parents with higher levels of education, schools located in non-Northeastern regions, schools located in suburban areas, schools with higher proportion of White students, and schools with medium levels of binge drinking. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study of US secondary schools, the prevalence of past-year NUPS varied widely, highlighting the need for schools to assess their own students rather than relying solely on regional, state, or national results. The study offered new evidence of an association between a greater proportion of the student body that uses stimulant therapy and a greater risk for NUPS in schools. The association between greater school-level stimulant therapy for ADHD and other school-level risk factors suggests valuable targets for monitoring, risk-reduction strategies, and preventive efforts to reduce NUPS.

First-line Behavioral Health Treatment Prior to Stimulant or Alpha-2 Agonist Use for Preschoolers on Kentucky Medicaid in 2017.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess the degree to which the American Academy of Pediatrics' (AAP) clinical guidelines were followed when treating attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in preschoolers. METHOD: Using Medicaid claims for children 4 to 5 years of age receiving their first dose of stimulants/alpha-2 agonists in 2017 (n = 836), we determined if BH was received prior to initiation of medication. We examined predictors after controlling for confounders. RESULTS: More than half the sample did not receive first-line BH, which did not differ by demographics. Those receiving BH prior to medication had a higher rate of receiving an ADHD diagnosis. Only three diagnoses were significant in multivariate (OR 13.8, 95% CI [1.7-115.1]) analyses. CONCLUSION: More than half the sample did not, conservatively, meet the AAP clinical recommendations. Further research is needed to identify targets for intervention. Limitations are noted.

Open assessment of the therapeutic and rate-dependent effects of brain balance center® and interactive metronome® exercises on children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

The aim of this open study was to delineate domains of benefit and effect size measures to design an appropriately powered randomized control trial to assess the efficacy of Brain Balance@ exercises and Interactive Metronome@ training (BB/IM) on ADHD symptoms in children. Participants underwent an extensive 15-week, 5 time per week, at-home training program. Results were assessed in 16 youths with ADHD (14M/2F, 10.8±1.7 years) who completed the program and compared to 8 typically developing controls (4M/F4, 11.0±1.8 years). BB/IM was associated with a significant reduction of 8.3 and 8.2 points on the Conner's Parent Rating Scale - Revised and the ADHD Rating Scale - IV. BB/IM was not associated with improvement on the Quotient ADHD System but with rate-dependent effects on hyperactivity and attention that were similar to previously reported effects of low dose methylphenidate. Both therapeutic and rate-dependent effects were observed on the Tower of London. The study provides information that could be used to design a randomized control trial, which is required for proof of efficacy. A key limitation is that 59% of the 39 enrolled participants with ADHD dropped out of the study and a new study should include multiple ratings during the course of treatment.

Efficacy and safety of methylphenidate and behavioural parent training for children aged 3-5 years with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, and sham behavioural parent training-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: There is insufficient evidence to support treatment recommendations for preschool children aged 3-5 years with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of methylphenidate and behavioural parent training in reducing the frequency and severity of symptoms and improving global functioning in preschool children with ADHD. METHODS: We did an 8-week, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled and sham behavioural parent training-controlled clinical trial (the MAPPA Study) in children aged 3-5 years with moderate-to-severe ADHD. The trial was conducted at the Institute of Psychiatry, Hospital das Clinicas, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive immediate-release methylphenidate plus educational intervention (sham behavioural parent training), placebo medication plus behavioural parent training, or placebo medication plus educational intervention. Randomisation was done by an independent research manager by use of a permuted block randomisation procedure. Parents, teachers, study staff, and evaluators remained masked to group allocation. Methylphenidate and placebo were titrated to a maximum dose of 1·25 mg/kg per day administered orally twice daily, and behavioural parent training and the educational intervention were delivered weekly through 90 min sessions with both the child and parent, conducted by two psychologists or learning therapists. The primary outcomes were parents' and teachers' composite scores of the Swanson, Nolan, and Pelham-IV scale (SNAP-IV-P/T), the Clinical Global Impressions Severity (CGI-S) scale, and the Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02807870, and is now complete. All participants were invited to participate in an open observational follow-up, which is ongoing. FINDINGS: Between Aug 21, 2016, and Oct 21, 2019, 153 children were randomly assigned to receive methylphenidate plus the educational intervention (n=51), placebo plus behavioural parent training (n=51), or placebo plus the educational intervention (n=51). Nine (6%) children discontinued treatment. All participants were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Children in the methylphenidate plus educational intervention group showed greater reductions in the SNAP-IV-P/T (endpoint mean difference -3·93 [95% CI -7·14 to -0·73], p=0·049; effect size -0·55 [95% CI -0·99 to -0·10]) and CGI-S scores (endpoint mean difference -0·49 [-0·82 to -0·17], p=0·0088; effect size -0·70 [-1·16 to -0·24]) and a greater increase in CGAS scores (endpoint mean difference 5·25 [95% CI 2·09 to 8·40], p=0·0036; effect size 0·80 [95% CI 0·32 to 1·28]) than children in the placebo plus educational intervention group. Children in the placebo plus behavioural parent training group did not have significantly different SNAP-IV-P/T scores (endpoint mean difference -3·18 [95% CI -6·38 to 0·02], p=0·077; effect size -0·44 [95% CI -0·89 to 0·003]) or CGI-S scores (endpoint mean difference -0·35 [-0·68 to -0·03], p=0·052; effect size -0·50 [-0·96 to -0·04]) compared to children in the placebo plus educational intervention group, but they had a greater increase in CGAS scores compared to the placebo plus educational intervention group (endpoint mean difference 3·69 [0·53 to 6·85], p=0·033; effect size 0·56 [0·08 to 1·04]). Children in the methylphenidate plus educational intervention versus placebo plus behavioural parent training group did not have statistically or clinically significant differences in primary outcomes. Children in the methylphenidate plus educational intervention group had more mild adverse events than the other two groups, and there were no between-group differences for moderate or severe adverse events. INTERPRETATION: Methylphenidate was effective in reducing ADHD symptoms and improving functionality, and behavioural parent training was effective in improving functionality for preschool children with ADHD after 8 weeks of treatment. FUNDING: São Paulo Research Foundation and Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development.

Interventions for ADHD in children & adolescents with epilepsy: A review and decision tree to guide clinicians.

Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is one of the most common pediatric epilepsy comorbidities. Treating ADHD in the context of epilepsy can be overwhelming for parents and clinicians. Current frontline treatment for ADHD is stimulant medication. However, some parents of pediatric patients with epilepsy have concerns about adding additional medication to their child's epilepsy regimen and/or about adverse effects of stimulant medication. Non-medication ADHD treatments including psychosocial interventions and ketogenic diet have also shown success in improving ADHD symptoms. Our focused review provides an easy-to-use guide for clinicians on ADHD interventions and combinations of interventions for pediatric patients with epilepsy and ADHD. Our guide includes information from 8 electronic databases for peer-reviewed, English language studies of psychosocial treatments for youth with epilepsy and ADHD. One hundred eight studies were selected based on inclusion criteria (21 systematic reviews, 12 meta-analyses, 8 literature reviews, 6 population surveys, 31 clinical trials, 20 cross-sectional studies, and 10 retrospective reviews). Results indicated that stimulant medication is a frontline treatment for ADHD symptoms in youth with epilepsy, with important caveats and alternatives.

Aminophylline in combination with caffeine citrate in neurodevelopmental treatment and follow-up of high-risk preterm infants using GMs assessment.

To explore the application effect of aminophylline combined with caffeine citrate and GMs in the evaluation of neurodevelopmental treatment and follow-up in high-risk preterm infants. A retrospective analysis of 66 high-risk preterm infants admitted to Hengshui People's Hospital from January 2020 to June 2021 was conducted. The children who received only conventional treatment were set as the control group, while those who received aminophylline and caffeine citrate on the basis of conventional treatment were set as the experimental group, 33 cases each group; GMs were used to evaluate the neurodevelopmental function of the children, and the treatment effect was analyzed. The normal proportion of GMs assessment results in the twisting phase and restless movement phase of the experimental group was superior to the control group (P<0.05); The proportion of children with normal neurodevelopment in the experimental group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P<0.05). Aminophylline in combination with caffeine citrate can help promote the neurodevelopment of children and improve their physical health using GMs assessment in the treatment and follow-up of high-risk preterm infants.

Clinical characteristics of children and adolescents with ADHD with or without methylphenidate prescription at their first diagnostic assessment.

Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is the most prevalent neurodevelopmental disorder diagnosed in the scholar age. It is associated with significant impairment in global functioning, and in moderate/severe presentations the outcome is critically dependent on pharmacological optimization of the multi-modal treatment. Methylphenidate (MPH) is the first-choice pharmacological treatment in children and adolescents with ADHD, with substantial evidence of significant efficacy and effectiveness on global functioning and symptoms' severity. There is some evidence supporting a few clinical and socio-demographic variables as predictors of pharmacological treatment prescription in children with ADHD independently of ADHD symptoms severity. However, it is warranted to investigate clinical and general psychopathological characteristics potentially associated with negative outcomes and the need for pharmacological treatment to inform appropriate prescription strategies. In this context, we compared 268 children and adolescents who were prescribed MPH (ADHD/MPH) for the first time after their first diagnostic assessment at our center, and 444 children and adolescents with ADHD (ADHD/noMPH) who were recommended non-pharmacological evidence-based interventions alone. ADHD/MPH group had higher severity of non-ADHD psychopathological symptoms compared to the ADHD/noMPH group, as documented by higher scores on the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) subscales, higher severity of ADHD symptoms, lower average IQ and lower adaptive levels independently of IQ. More specifically, beside externalizing symptoms, also internalizing symptoms were significantly higher in the ADHD/MPH group. The presence of significant non-ADHD psychopathology should be considered as a clinical factor associated with the need for MPH prescription in children and adolescents with ADHD.

Methodological review of caffeine assessment strategies with a focus on adolescents.

Adolescent caffeine use and its implications for developmental changes in sleep and circadian rhythms is under-researched. A majority of adolescents report consuming caffeine and yet the United States has not established federal guidelines for this age group. This widely used stimulant is primarily studied using self-report methodologies; however, there is no standardized method for collecting self-report caffeine data and past studies' findings have limited generalizability and comparability, making it challenging to examine the effects of caffeine use on adolescents' sleep. This review discusses methods and measures used for assessing caffeine in the field with adolescents: questionnaires, interviews, and diaries. Based on the review, recommendations for future methodologies and approaches are discussed.

The Winding Road to Equal Care: Attitudes and Experiences of Prescribing ADHD Medication among Pediatric Psychiatrists: A Qualitative Study.

Evidence is lacking on how to understand the reasons for variations, both in prevalence of ADHD and ADHD medication prescribing patterns in children and adolescents, within Region Skåne. These variations are not in line with current national clinical guidelines and seem to have increased over time. This qualitative interview study illuminates pediatric psychiatrists' attitudes toward ADHD and their experiences of prescribing ADHD medication. Eleven pediatric psychiatrists described the complex interplay of variables that they experienced while assessing a child, which had influence on their decision to prescribe medication. Being part of a local unit's culture influenced how ADHD medications were prescribed. They wished that the assessment of the child's symptoms was consistent with guidelines in every unit but noted that such alignment was not implemented. They pointed out that an ADHD diagnosis is dependent on the surrounding's motivation and capacity to adapt to the present state of the child. The participants described how they balanced clinical guidelines with demands from the family, as well as from society at large. Their personal attitudes and clinical experiences towards diagnosing and prescribing medications to children with ADHD influenced their decisions. The study adds information about how attitudes may lead to variation in diagnostics and therapy.

Factors Associated With Children Diagnosed With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and 30-Day Follow-up Care With Practitioners Among Medicaid Recipients in Georgia.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: It is important that children prescribed attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) medication get timely follow-up care. In 2018, only 44% of US Medicaid recipients attended a follow-up visit within 30 days of their first ADHD prescription. The objective of this study was to identify the member and practitioner-related predictors that were associated with children who were diagnosed with ADHD and had a follow-up visit within 30 days (initiation phase) of their first prescription of ADHD medication (Index Prescription Start Date, or IPSD). METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted to identify the independent predictors of a follow-up visit within 30 days and 2 follow-up visits within 270 days after the initiation phase (continuation and maintenance phase, or C&M phase) for Medicaid recipients. Predictive factors examined included race, school age group, gender, geography of residence, Medicaid service region, newly diagnosed ADHD, hospital admission, emergency department (ED) visit, types of ADHD medication, other psychosocial or behavioral diagnoses, psychosocial or behavioral therapy, prescriber specialty, and school season. RESULTS: There were 2369 members eligible for the initiation phase measure, of whom 330 members were eligible for the C&M phase measure. Multiple regression analysis found that unmet 30-day follow-up was significantly associated with African American children with an existing diagnosis of ADHD (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 2.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.64-2.76), middle school-aged children (AOR = 1.49; 95% CI, 1.23-1.80), rural residence (AOR = 1.27; 95% CI, 1.05-1.55), no ED visit (AOR = 1.57; 95% CI, 1.16-2.12), no psychosocial or behavioral therapy prior to the IPSD (AOR = 2.30; 95% CI, 1.65-3.21), and primary care practitioners (AOR = 1.88; 95% CI, 1.45-2.44). CONCLUSION: Pediatrics was the most common specialty prescribing ADHD medications. Managed care organizations can focus intervention efforts to improve compliance with 30-day follow-up among Medicaid children by targeting the high-risk categories identified above. They can also focus on facilitating communication between behavioral health practitioners and pediatricians about several key points: (1) the importance of using behavioral health therapy prior to prescribing medication; (2) the importance of timely follow-up care; and (3) the importance of medication management in combination with behavioral health therapy.

The cost-effectiveness of treatments for attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder and autism spectrum disorder in children and adolescents: a systematic review.

Economic evaluations can help decision makers identify what services for children with neurodevelopmental disorders provide best value-for-money. The aim of this paper is to review the best available economic evidence to support decision making for attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in children and adolescents. We conducted a systematic review of economic evaluations of ADHD and ASD interventions including studies published 2010-2020, identified through Econlit, Medline, PsychINFO, and ERIC databases. Only full economic evaluations comparing two or more options, considering both costs and consequences were included. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Drummond checklist. We identified ten studies of moderate-to-good quality on the cost-effectiveness of treatments for ADHD and two studies of good quality of interventions for ASD. The majority of ADHD studies evaluated pharmacotherapy (n = 8), and two investigated the economic value of psychosocial/behavioral interventions. Both economic evaluations for ASD investigated early and communication interventions. Included studies support the cost-effectiveness of behavioral parenting interventions for younger children with ADHD. Among pharmacotherapies for ADHD, different combinations of stimulant/non-stimulant medications for children were cost-effective at willingness-to-pay thresholds reported in the original papers. Early intervention for children with suspected ASD was cost-effective, but communication-focused therapy for preschool children with ASD was not. Prioritizing more studies in this area would allow decision makers to promote cost-effective and clinically effective interventions for this target group.