Assessment of the safe and efficacious dose of the selective progesterone receptor modulator vilaprisan for the treatment of patients with uterine fibroids by exposure-response modelling and simulation.

AIMS: We report population pharmacokinetic (popPK) and exposure-response (E-R) analyses for efficacy (induced amenorrhoea [IA]) and safety (unbound oestradiol [E2] concentrations) of the selective progesterone receptor modulator vilaprisan. Results were used to inform the dose for the Phase 3 programme in patients with uterine fibroids. METHODS: A popPK model was developed using data from Phase 1 and 2 studies (including ASTEROID 1 and 2). The relationship between vilaprisan exposure (steady-state AUC) and IA after oral administration of 0.5, 1, 2 or 4 mg/day over 3 months was analysed in ASTEROID 1 using logistic regression and qualified in ASTEROID 2 by comparing simulated and observed probability for IA after 2 mg/day. The exposure-E2 relationship was analysed visually. RESULTS: Vilaprisan clearance was 22.7% lower in obese vs non-obese patients. The E-R relationship for IA in ASTEROID 1 was steep and consistent with ASTEROID 2, with a maximum probability (Pmax ) of 59% (95% CI: 49-68%). The exposure at which 50% of Pmax is obtained was 36.9 µg*h/L (95% CI: 27.7-48.7 µg*h/L). Simulations showed that 36% of the patients will be below 90% of Pmax for IA after 1 mg/day compared to 2% after 2 mg/day. E2 levels tended to decrease with increasing exposure. While E2 levels remained largely within the physiologic follicular phase range, the clinical relevance of this decrease will be evaluated in long-term studies. CONCLUSIONS: A 2 mg/day dose was selected for Phase 3 as E-R analyses show this dose results in a close to maximum probability for IA, without any safety concerns noted.

Comparative assessment of outcomes and adverse effects using two different intramuscular testosterone therapy regimens: 100 mg IM weekly or 200 mg IM biweekly.

This study aimed to compare the change in levels of several laboratory values and the development of adverse events using two commonly used intramuscular testosterone therapy regimens. Men were included if they were 18 years or older and received one of the following testosterone therapy regimens: 100 mg intramuscular once weekly or 200 mg intramuscular once every other week. Primary outcomes were relative changes in total testosterone, free testosterone, estradiol, prostate-specific antigen, and hematocrit at 6 months after initiation of testosterone therapy. Secondary outcomes were any significant rises in estradiol, hematocrit, prostate-specific antigen, and any other treatment-related adverse events requiring cessation of testosterone therapy. A total of 263 men were enrolled. In a subanalysis of men who had a baseline hematocrit below 54% before intramuscular testosterone therapy initiation, we found the following: men who received 100 mg weekly injections were significantly less likely to have hematocrit levels rising above 54% (1/102 (1%) vs. 4/51 (8%); p = 0.023). No significant differences were recorded in the increase in total testosterone, free testosterone, prostate-specific antigen, and estradiol levels between both groups. A higher average serum testosterone over the dosing interval seen with the 200 mg regimen appears to be associated with a higher risk of erythrocytosis.

In vivo assessment of respiratory burst inhibition by xenobiotic exposure using larval zebrafish.

Currently, assessment of the potential immunotoxicity of a given agent involves a tiered approach for hazard identification and mechanistic studies, including observational studies, evaluation of immune function, and measurement of susceptibility to infectious and neoplastic diseases. These studies generally use costly low-throughput mammalian models. Zebrafish, however, offer an excellent alternative due to their rapid development, ease of maintenance, and homology to mammalian immune system function and development. Larval zebrafish also are a convenient model to study the innate immune system with no interference from the adaptive immune system. In this study, a respiratory burst assay (RBA) was utilized to measure reactive oxygen species (ROS) production after developmental xenobiotic exposure. Embryos were exposed to non-teratogenic doses of chemicals and at 96 h post-fertilization, the ability to produce ROS was measured. Using the RBA, 12 compounds with varying immune-suppressive properties were screened. Seven compounds neither suppressed nor enhanced the respiratory burst; five reproducibly suppressed global ROS production, but with varying potencies: benzo[a]pyrene, 17ß-estradiol, lead acetate, methoxychlor, and phenanthrene. These five compounds have all previously been reported as immunosuppressive in mammalian innate immunity assays. To evaluate whether the suppression of ROS by these compounds was a result of decreased immune cell numbers, flow cytometry with transgenic zebrafish larvae was used to count the numbers of neutrophils and macrophages after chemical exposure. With this assay, benzo[a]pyrene was found to be the only chemical that induced a change in the number of immune cells by increasing macrophage but not neutrophil numbers. Taken together, this work demonstrates the utility of zebrafish larvae as a vertebrate model for identifying compounds that impact innate immune function at non-teratogenic levels and validates measuring ROS production and phagocyte numbers as metrics for monitoring how xenobiotic exposure alters the innate immune system.

In Vitro Assessment of Cytotoxicity and Estrogenicity of Vivera® Retainers.

AIM: To investigate the cytotoxicity and estrogenicity of Vivera® retainers by assessing their biological behavioral effects as-received from the manufacturer and after retrieved from patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this, in vitro investigation six sets (maxillary and mandibular) of Vivera® retainers, three as received and three retrieved after four weeks of use by patients of an orthodontic postgraduate clinic, were immersed in the normal saline solution for 14 days following different modes of sterilization. The estrogenicity assays involved two cell lines, namely the estrogen-sensitive MCF-7 and the estrogen-insensitive MDA-MB-231. Following a 6 day incubation with the solutions to be tested, at concentrations varying from 5% to 20% v/v in medium supplemented with 2% fetal calf serum devoid of endogenous estrogens, estrogenicity was assessed by cell counting; p-Estradiol was used as positive control. The statistical analysis of data was performed with two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with appliance and concentration as predictors. Differences were further investigated with the Tukey multiple comparison tests at the 0.05 level of significance. RESULTS: No significant MCF-7 proliferation was induced by the three samples compared either to the eluents from as-received retainers or to the negative control. As expected, p-estradiol induced a potent stimulation of MCF-7 cell proliferation, while no effect was observed on MDA-MB-231 cells. CONCLUSION: Under the conditions of this experiment eluents of as-received and retrieved Vivera® retainers did not seem to exhibit xenoestrogenic activity. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Vivera® retainers can be used as part-time removable oral appliances following the manufacturer's instructions.

Clinical Assessment of Urinary Tract Damage during Sustained-Release Estrogen Supplementation in Mice.

Estrogen supplementation is a key component of numerous mouse research models but can adversely affect the urinary system. The goal of this study was to develop a clinical scoring system and identify biomarkers of occult urinary tract lesions prior to the development of systemic illness in mice. Ovariectomized or sham-surgery SCID mice were implanted subcutaneously with a placebo pellet or one containing sustained-release estradiol (0.18 mg 60-d release 17ß-estradiol). Mice were assessed twice weekly for 4 to 6 wk by using a clinical scoring system that included body condition, general activity, posture, hair coat, hydration, abdominal distension, urine staining of coat and skin, and ability to urinate. Samples were collected weekly for urinalysis, BUN, creatinine, and serum estradiol levels. Terminal samples were analyzed for histopathologic lesions. Compared with placebo controls, estradiolsupplemented mice had higher serum estradiol levels at weeks 2 and 3; significant differences in total clinical scores by the 3-wk time point; and in body condition, general activity, posture, hair coat, and urine staining scores by the 6-wk terminal time point. Urinary tract lesions included hydronephrosis, pyelonephritis, cystitis, and urolithiasis. All mice with urolithiasis had crystalluria, and 5 of the 6 mice with pyelonephritis or hydroureter had dilute urine (that is, specific gravity less than 1.030). However, these findings were not specific to mice with lesions. A total clinical score of 3.5 (maximum, 24) identified estradiol-supplemented mice with 83% specificity and 50% sensitivity, but no single clinical parameter, biomarker, or the total clinical score accurately predicted occult urinary tract lesions. Considering the lesions we observed, prudence is warranted when using pelleted sustained-release estradiol in mice, and important parameters to monitor for animal health include urine staining, body condition score, urine sediment, and urine specific gravity.

[Assessment of the clinical efficacy and safety of fulvestrant in heavily pretreated patients with hormone-receptor positive metastatic breast cancer-a single-institution experience].

Fulvestrant, a pure estrogen receptor antagonist with no known agonist effects, was approved in September 2011 for the treatment of hormone-receptor positive metastatic breast cancer(MBC)in postmenopausal women in Japan. Here, we present a retrospective review of data from 73 heavily pretreated patients who received a high-dose regimen of fulvestrant in our hospital. Patients received a median of 3 endocrine therapies(range: 1-7)prior to the fulvestrant regimen. Partial response was observed in 4 patients, and 10 patients experienced stable disease for more than 6 months(objective response rate: 5.5%; clinical benefit rate: 19.2%). The median time to progression was 2.8 months. Fulvestrant was well tolerated; however, Grade 3 neuropathy at the injection site was observed in 2 patients. Of 12 patients, 3 responded to endocrine therapy following fulvestrant treatment. Our clinical experience indicates that fulvestrant can be administered to patients pretreated with several lines of endocrine therapy, although its efficacy as first- or second-line endocrine therapy has been demonstrated in clinical trial settings.

Ethinyl estradiol and 17ß-estradiol in combined oral contraceptives: pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and risk assessment.

The need to seek improved combined oral contraceptive (COC) efficacy, with fewer health risks and better acceptability, has been ongoing since the introduction of COCs more than 50 years ago. New progestin formulations combined with lower doses of ethinyl estradiol (EE), the predominant estrogenic component of COCs, have reduced the incidence of venous thromboembolism and other negative outcomes of COC treatment. Previous attempts to use endogenous 17ß-estradiol (E2) instead of EE were limited primarily by poor cycle control. The recent introduction of E2-based formulations has renewed interest to determine if there are potential benefits of using E2 in COCs. These formulations have been shown to have similar efficacy and cycle control as EE-based COCs. This review provides a brief summary of the pharmacology of EE and E2, including metabolism, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, as well as adverse effects of these estrogens.

Estradiol valerate/dienogest: a novel combined oral contraceptive.

BACKGROUND: Estradiol valerate/dienogest (E2V/DNG) is a combined oral contraceptive (COC) with 2 new hormonal entities and a unique 4-phasic dosing regimen indicated for women to prevent pregnancy. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to review the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, tolerability, and cost of E2V/DNG. METHODS: MEDLINE (1966-June 2011) and EMBASE (1966-June 2011) were searched for original research and review articles published in the English language using the terms Natazia or Qlaira or estradiol valerate and dienogest. The reference lists of identified articles were reviewed for additional pertinent publications. Abstracts from the 2005 to 2011 American Society of Reproductive Medicine and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists meetings were searched using the same terms. RESULTS: The search provided 56 articles that addressed the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, clinical efficacy, and tolerability of E2V/DNG in women of reproductive age. Articles reporting efficacy or tolerability in the setting of menopause were excluded. The initial efficacy of E2V/DNG on ovulation inhibition was investigated in 2 prospective, randomized, open-label, Phase II dose-finding studies. The dose that was approved by the Food and Drug Administration resulted in 3.13% of women ovulating in the second cycle of treatment (90% CI, 0.2%-6.05%). Rate of pregnancy prevention with this agent was reported with a Pearl Index ranging from 0.73 to 1.27 (unadjusted) to 0.34 to 0.72 (adjusted for method failure only). The mean duration of withdrawal bleeding was 4.3 days (range, 4.0-4.6 days) among 2266 women receiving 13 treatment cycles. Adverse events reported in >1% of patients included abdominal pain, acne, breast pain, dysmenorrhea, emotional lability, headache, nausea, and weight increase. CONCLUSIONS: Estradiol valerate/dienogest is a new contraceptive formulation. It offers efficacy, tolerability, and an acceptable safety profile with a potentially better bleeding pattern than levonorgestrel-containing COCs. This COC may be especially useful for older women of reproductive age who are adherent to therapy and looking for shorter and/or lighter menstrual cycles. Studies will need to be performed to determine whether clinically significant differences in outcomes exist among E2V/DNG and other available COCs.

Estradiol valerate/dienogest: a novel oral contraceptive.

OBJECTIVE: To review the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of the new oral contraceptive estradiol valerate/dienogest. DATA SOURCES: Searches of PubMed (1966-July 2011) and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970-July 2011) were conducted using the key words estradiol valerate, dienogest, Natazia, and Qlaira. Bibliographies of retrieved articles were reviewed to identify additional references. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: All identified studies published in English and involving efficacy and safety of estradiol valerate/dienogest as an oral contraceptive were reviewed. DATA SYNTHESIS: Estradiol valerate/dienogest is a 4-phasic oral contraceptive approved for the prevention of pregnancy. The 4-phasic design allows for acceptable cycle control with this hormonal combination. In efficacy trials of estradiol valerate/dienogest in women aged 18-35 years, the Pearl Index ranged from 0.40 to 1.64, a range comparable to that of other combination oral contraceptives. The safety profile was also similar to that of other oral contraceptives, with headache, metrorrhagia, breast tenderness, nausea or vomiting, acne, and weight gain reported as the most common adverse effects. Menstrual bleeding patterns and cycle control with estradiol valerate/dienogest were comparable to those of a monophasic oral contraceptive containing ethinyl estradiol/levonorgestrel. Estradiol valerate/dienogest differs from other oral contraceptives in that it necessitates more stringent dosing guidelines for maximum contraceptive efficacy. New starts should be on the first day of menses only, and a back-up method of contraception is required for the first 9 days, as compared to 7 days with other oral contraceptives. Back-up contraception is usually required for any pill taken more than 12 hours later than scheduled. CONCLUSIONS: Estradiol valerate/dienogest is an effective oral contraceptive. Because it has more stringent start times and requires a longer duration of backup contraception and stricter adherence, estradiol valerate/dienogest should be reserved for patients who are intolerant of other combination oral contraceptives.

Cardiovascular risk assessment with oxidised LDL measurement in postmenopausal women receiving intranasal estrogen replacement therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of intranasal estrogen replacement therapy administered to postmenopausal women alone or in combination with progesterone on markers of cardiovascular risk. METHODS: The study was conducted with 44 voluntary postmenopausal women. In group I (n = 15), the patients were treated with only intranasal estradiol (300 µg/day estradiol hemihydrate). In group II (n = 11), the patients received cyclic progesterone (200 mg/day micronized progesterone) for 12 days in each cycle in addition to continuous intranasal estradiol. Group III (n = 18) was the controls. Serum lipid profiles, oxidised low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and other markers of cardiovascular risk were assessed at baseline and at the 3rd month of the treatment. RESULTS: Lipid profile, LDL apolipoprotein B, lipoprotein a, homocysteine, oxidised LDL values and oxidised LDL/LDL cholesterol ratio were not observed to change after 3 months compared to baseline values within each group (p > 0.016). In comparison to changes between the groups after the treatment, only oxidised LDL levels and oxidised LDL/LDL cholesterol ratios of group II were increased compared to control group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Intranasal estradiol alone did not appear to have an effect on markers of cardiovascular risk in healthy postmenopausal women. However, the addition of cyclic oral micronized progesterone to intranasal estradiol influenced the markers of cardiovascular risk negatively in comparison to non-users in healthy postmenopausal women.

What role for Qlaira in contraception?

Around 25% of women in the UK aged 16-49 years use oral contraception.1 Annually, around 5 million combined oral contraceptive (COC) items are prescribed in primary care in England alone, at a cost of over pound40 million. The effectiveness of such contraception depends on correct and consistent use of the pills and is influenced by unwanted effects that can lead to discontinuation (e.g. bleeding irregularities), and by adherence to specified procedures for when a pill is missed. Qlaira (Bayer plc) is the first licensed COC in the UK to include the oestrogen estradiol valerate (E2V, which is metabolised to oestradiol, a natural human hormone) and the progestogen dienogest (DNG). It has been marketed as "the first and only COC to deliver...the same oestrogen as produced by a woman's body". In theory, it might be less likely than other COCs to cause unwanted effects. However, it has a complex dosage regimen, and has its own missed-pill guidance which differs substantially from that for other pills.3 Here we review the effectiveness and place of Qlaira.

Economic evaluation of fulvestrant as an extra step in the treatment sequence for ER-positive advanced breast cancer.

Drug therapies for advanced breast cancer in hormone-receptor-positive disease include both hormonal and chemotherapies. Current UK practice is to minimise toxicity by using sequential hormonal agents for as long as clinically appropriate. A Markov model was developed to investigate the cost effectiveness of different sequences of therapies, particularly exploring the effects of adding an additional hormonal agent, fulvestrant, to the treatment pathway. A systematic review was undertaken and a panel of seven UK oncologists validated assumptions used for treatment efficacy, treatment pathways and resources used. Fulvestrant was found to be a cost-effective treatment option when added to the treatment sequence as a second- or third-line hormonal therapy for advanced disease. For a cohort of 1000 patients, fulvestrant as a second-line hormone therapy provided an additional 47 life years and 41 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), at an additional cost of pound 301 359. This equated to pound 6500 per life years gained and pound 7500 per QALY. When used as a third-line option, the fulvestrant arm was dominant providing an increase in health benefit of 27 QALYs for the whole cohort, at a mean overall cost reduction of pound 430 per patient. Sensitivity analyses showed these results to be robust, demonstrating that fulvestrant is an economically viable additional endocrine option in the United Kingdom for the treatment of hormone responsive advanced breast cancer.

Economic impact of tibolone compared with continuous-combined hormone replacement therapy. In the management of postmenopausal women with climacteric symptoms in the UK.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the economic impact of using tibolone 2.5 mg compared with 17 beta-estradiol 2 mg/norethisterone acetate 1 mg (E2/NETA) in postmenopausal women with climacteric symptoms. DESIGN AND SETTING: This was a modelling study performed from the perspective of the UK's National Health Service (NHS). METHODS: The clinical outcomes from a previously reported trial were used as the clinical basis for the analysis, which showed that 48 weeks' treatment with tibolone and E2/NETA significantly alleviated the climacteric symptoms experienced by postmenopausal women. These data were combined with resource utilisation estimates derived from a panel of 10 GPs and 3 gynaecologists, enabling us to construct a Markov model depicting changes in the health status of postmenopausal women. The model was used to estimate the expected NHS costs and consequences after 48 weeks' treatment with tibolone and E2/NETA. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES AND RESULTS: The mean expected direct healthcare cost of using tibolone and E2/NETA to manage postmenopausal women for 48 weeks was estimated to be 260 Pounds and 239 Pounds (1997/1998 prices) per patient, respectively. Starting hormone replacement therapy (HRT) with tibolone instead of E2/NETA was equally effective in alleviating climacteric symptoms (65.9 and 62.2%, respectively; p = 0.516) over 48 weeks and significantly reduced the incidence of vaginal bleeding by 36% (p < 0.0001) and breast tenderness by 57% (p < 0.0001) for a mean additional cost of 21 Pounds (ranging between -3 Pounds and 42 Pounds) per patient. The acquisition cost of HRT was the primary cost driver for tibolone-treated patients, whereas the cost of managing adverse events was the primary cost driver for E2/NETA-treated patients. CONCLUSIONS: The true cost of prescribing tibolone and E2/NETA is impacted on by a broad range of resources, not only drug acquisition costs. Although the acquisition cost of tibolone is higher than that of E2/NETA, the difference in the expected NHS cost of the first year of treatment between the 2 HRTs is negligible. This is because of the higher incidence of adverse events among E2/NETA-treated patients, which also results in a higher continuation rate among tibolone-treated patients. Factors such as patient preferences should also be taken into consideration so that treatment choices are not decided solely on the basis of acquisition costs.

Cyclofem/Cyclo-Provera: emerging countries' perspective.

Cyclo-Provera, the original name of the combination of 25 mg medroxyprogesterone acetate and 5 mg estradiol cypionate, later known as Cyclofem and hereafter referred to MPA/E2C, has proven its use-effectiveness (pregnancy rate less than 1%) in routine service delivery conditions. Overall, the life-table discontinuation rates at 1 year ranged from 33.5% to 71.8%. Only a third of total discontinuations were attributable to the injectable contraceptive method, thus raising the importance of service delivery issues related to its continued use. The results of introductory trials in Mexico, Indonesia, Thailand, Tunisia, Jamaica and, more recently, Brazil, Colombia, Chile and Peru have demonstrated that MPA/E2C is a highly effective contraceptive that could be offered as an alternative to current fertility regulation methods for many women around the world. In addition, the results of studies were the basis for the approval of MPA/E2C by local health authorities and its inclusion in the Ministries of Health Family Planning Programs.

Dihydroxyprogesterone acetophenide 150 mg + estradiol enantate 10 mg as monthly injectable contraceptives.

A survey among users and health personnel participating in the Salvadorian Social Security Institute (ISSS) Family Planning Program revealed interest in including a monthly preparation for injection as a contraceptive method offered by this Institution. The formulation containing dihydroxyprogesterone acetophenide (DHPA) 150 mg + estradiol enantate (E2EN) 10 mg was chosen for conducting an open and prospective study of efficacy and tolerability. Between January 1992 and March 1994, 7054 women were treated with this product for a total of 60010 months. A sample composed of 4505 women treated at this Institution confirmed that average users are young, have one or two children, do not show a particular geographical distribution and choose the monthly injection instead of oral contraceptives as the first contraceptive method or for the puerperium. The study formulation showed a high efficacy (Pearl Index: 0.018) and tolerability (general withdrawal rate throughout the study: 27.09%). The most frequent adverse events included bleeding disorders, headache and mastalgia; their incidence decreased spontaneously from the sixth month (3.9%), reaching 0% after two years. Treatment was discontinued due to adverse events in 3.47% of women. No significant bodyweight or systolic and diastolic blood pressure alterations were observed. Based on these results, the monthly injectable contraceptive was included in the basic product list at ISSS.

An objective and subjective assessment of uterine blood loss in postmenopausal women on hormone replacement therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the volume of withdrawal blood loss in women taking hormone replacement therapy (HRT). DESIGN: Prospective randomized double blind cross-over trial. SUBJECTS: Twenty-nine postmenopausal women, with climacteric symptoms. INTERVENTIONS: The women were treated with cycles of 2 mg oestradiol valerate for 21 days combined with either 250 micrograms levonorgestrel or 10 mg medroxyprogesterone acetate, for the last ten days. Each woman was randomly allocated to one of the preparations and switched to the other after four months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Uterine blood loss was estimated by the alkaline haematin method. Bleeding patterns were recorded specifying the number of days with bleeding and subjective rating of the amount of blood lost. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The mean uterine blood loss was 35.2 ml and was equivalent to the normal menstrual blood loss. There was no significant difference between therapies but the women themselves considered that they bled more heavily when taking the levonorgestrel combination. The intraindividual variation in blood loss was small, independent of preparation taken, but the variation between individuals was large. Withdrawal bleeding started 2-3 days earlier when the women used the medroxyprogesterone acetate compared to the levonorgestrel formulation.

Pharmacodynamic assessment of dihydroxyprogesterone acetophenide plus estradiol enanthate as a monthly injectable contraceptive.

The pharmacodynamics of the combination of dihydroxyprogesterone acetophenide (DHPA) and estradiol enanthate (E2-EN) following its intramuscular administration at two doses were studied in 16 healthy women of reproductive age. Subjects were randomly allocated in two groups: group I (n = 9) received the combination DHPA 150 mg + E2-EN 10 mg on three consecutive monthly injections, while group II (n = 7) received half-dose of the same formulation. Ovarian function and endometrial bleeding patterns were investigated in all participants for one pre-treatment cycle, three treatment intervals and two post-treatment cycles. The results disclosed that ovulation was inhibited for at least 30 days following DHPA/E2-EN administration in all participants from both groups. The circulating estradiol levels 30 days after last injection were slightly elevated as compared with those observed in normal early follicular phase. Return to ovulatory cycles was documented within 90 days after treatment. The length of the bleeding-free intervals during treatment was shortened in both groups, particularly in group II. No significant changes in HDL-cholesterol levels were observed throughout the study. It is envisaged however, that large modification of the formulation and additional long-term safety studies will be required prior to its recommendation.

PIP: The pharmacodynamics of the combination of dihyroxyprogesterone acetophenide (DHPA) and estradiol enanthate (E2-EN) following its intramuscular administration at 2 doses were studied in 16 healthy women of reproductive age attending the Family Planning Clinic at General Hospital in Mexico City. Subjects were randomly allocated in 2 groups: group I (n=9) received the combination DHPA 150 milligrams and E2-EN 10 milligrams on 3 consecutive monthly injections, while group II (n=7) received 1/2 dose of the same formulation. Ovarian function and endometrial bleeding patterns were investigated in all participants for 1 pretreatment cycle, 3 treatment intervals and 2 post-treatment cycles. The results disclosed that ovulation was inhibited for at least 30 days following DHPA/E2-EN administration in all participants from both groups. The circulating estradiol levels 30 days after last injection were slightly elevated as compared with those observed in normal early follicular phase. Return to ovulatory cycles was documented within 90 days after treatment. The length of the bleeding-free intervals during treatment was shortened in both groups, particularly group II. No significant changes in HDL-cholesterol levels were observed throughout the study. It is envisaged however, that large modification of the formulation and additional long-term safety studies will be required prior to its recommendation.

[Clinical analysis and evaluation of various hematologic and metabolic constants with the use of monthly microdoses of parenteral contraceptives]. / Análisis clínico y valoración de algunas constantes hematologicas y metabólicas con el uso de un anticonceptivo parenteral mensual en microdósis.

PIP: 75 women of proven fertility were treated as a contraceptive measure with an injection of 75 mg. of duhydroxyprogesterone acetophenide, and of 5 mg. of estradiol enanthate. Doses were half of what regularly used, and were injected between the 7th and the 9th day of the cycle. Total number of cycles studied was 859. Most important side effects of the treatment was headache in 28.3% of patients, spotting in 15.5%, and emotional instability in 10.5%. Metabolic and hematologic data were unchanged, and vaginal cytology was negative. There were no pregnancies. It must be remembered that, in every contraceptive treatment, lower doses are always preferable when equally effective. (Summary in ENG).^ieng