Promoting cultural competency and osteopathic medicine awareness among premedical students through a summer premedical rural enrichment program.

CONTEXT: Premedical preparatory programs at osteopathic medical schools that recruit students from medically underserved areas (MUAs) may promote interest in practicing osteopathic medicine in underserved or rural areas. In these programs, emphasis on cultural competency may increase diversity among medical school applicants and decrease healthcare disparities in the future. OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study is to determine whether a summer premedical rural enrichment program (PREP) held at an osteopathic medical school located in a MUA will foster greater prioritization of cultural competency in medicine, enhance interest in practicing in rural or underserved areas, and increase familiarity with osteopathic medicine. METHODS: An eight-week summer PREP was hosted at the California Health Sciences University College of Osteopathic Medicine (CHSU-COM) in Clovis, California. Seventy-eight diverse participants were recruited from the Central Valley, an underserved region of California. Attendees were required to finish the formal application process and were recommended to have completed medical school prerequisite courses. The curriculum included Medical College Admission Test (MCAT) preparation through team-based learning sessions, introduction to the osteopathic medical school curriculum, osteopathic philosophy, and osteopathic manipulative medicine, as well as integrated anatomy and physiology sessions, medical school application workshops, mock interviews, simulation workshops, and sociology and cultural competency sessions. Data were collected via a voluntary and anonymous survey administered before and after the program with questions about familiarity with osteopathy, interest in practicing in underserved areas, medical school preparedness, and a post-course survey about cultural competency. The surveys had students rate statements on a Likert scale. RESULTS: Seventy-four of the 78 premedical students (95%) completed the pre-and postsurvey. There was a significant increase in agreement to statements evaluating medical school preparedness, osteopathic familiarity, and desire to practice medicine locally in the postprogram survey, compared to the preprogram survey. In the cultural competency postsurvey, 75.0% of the responses to questions that evaluated the positive effect of the course were "Agree" or "Strongly Agree." Of the reported postcourse outcomes, the average MCAT score was 504 ± 6.2 (38 students reported, 50.7%). Of the 27 participants who reported matriculation, 16 (59.2%) were admitted to osteopathic medical schools, 9 (33.3%) to allopathic medical schools, and 2 to other health programs. CONCLUSIONS: After completing the PREP program, premedical participants reported that they have better understanding of cultural competency and improvement in preparation for medical school, including familiarity with osteopathic medicine, and interest in serving MUAs. These findings indicate that similar programs may have a positive impact on MUAs. These programs may help create diverse and culturally competent osteopathic physicians.

Penn Access Summer Scholars program: a mixed method analysis of a virtual offering of a premedical diversity summer enrichment program.

In the USA, numerous summer programs are available for undergraduate students that seek to increase the number of individuals from groups underrepresented in medicine (URM) that matriculate to medical school. These programs have typically been conducted at research-focused institutions, involving hands-on-research and various enrichment experiences. For 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in the suspension of on-campus student activities at American universities, necessitating a switch to a virtual format for these URM-focused programs. Outcomes, however, from these programs conducted virtually, necessitated by the COVID-19 pandemic, have not been reported. The Penn Access Summer Scholars (PASS) program at the Perelman School of Medicine (PSOM) targets URM undergraduates, providing two consecutive summers of mentored research and enrichment experiences, with the goal of enabling participants' matriculation to PSOM. PASS has been an 8 week on-campus experience, but during summer 2020, virtual programming of 6 weeks was provided due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Participants in the 2020 virtual offering of PASS completed pre- and post-program surveys that included 5-point Likert-style and open-ended questions to determine the impact of the programing on self-assessments of research skills, familiarity with the physician identity, and preparedness to be a PSOM student. Post-program, participants also assessed program administration and content. With respect to program objectives, participants reported significant increases in their self-reported confidence in conducting research, understanding of physician identity, and sense of preparedness for medical school. The educational value of the program content, their level of engagement in the program and the overall quality of the program were rated as excellent or outstanding by large majorities of respondents. Content analyses of participant comments were consistent with these quantitative results. Therefore, a premedical summer enrichment program targeting URM undergraduates can be successfully conducted virtually to achieve program objectives and may increase the availability to these initiatives.

Premedical Student Exposure to Pharmaceutical Marketing: Too Much, Too Soon?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Direct pharmaceutical marketing to physicians by pharmaceutical representatives is effective in changing behavior of health care providers, resulting in less evidence-based prescribing. Although much has been written about pharmaceutical marketing exposures among medical students, less is known about direct marketing exposures before students matriculate. This study examined the types of pharmaceutical representative direct marketing exposures for premedical students and where they occurred. METHODS: From June to August of 2017, researchers surveyed students who accepted admission to US public medical schools. These prematriculated students completed our survey just prior to matriculation. The survey inquired about whether the students were exposed to pharmaceutical marketing directly from pharmaceutical salespeople, the types of marketing they observed or received, and where these interactions occurred. RESULTS: Survey participants included 911 prematriculated students from 14 of the 188 medical schools invited to participate. Seventy-one percent (646) of the participants received or observed someone receiving pharmaceutical marketing gifts, small meals or snacks, articles, or samples. The two most common contexts for direct pharmaceutical marketing exposures were during shadowing experiences (54%, 346) and during employment (50%, 323). CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that it may be common for medical students to have interacted directly with pharmaceutical salespeople or observed other health professionals in these interactions before they matriculate in medical school. Because many of these interactions occur during clinical experiences required by institutions for admission, medical schools and premedical associations should consider delivering conflict-of-interest education early in medical school education or before students matriculate.

The Value of Student-Run Clinics for Premedical Students: A Multi-Institutional Study.

INTRODUCTION: Research has shown that student-run clinics (SRCs) are ideal experiential learning arenas for medical students, but no studies have characterized the impact of SRC participation on premedical students. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study with newly matriculated first-year medical students at five California medical schools to determine the impact of premedical involvement in SRCs. Participants completed an anonymous one-time online survey that included demographic information and questions regarding SRC involvement prior to medical school. RESULTS: Two-hundred eighty-seven out of 588 (48.2%) newly matriculated first-year medical students responded, with 17.4% of respondents reporting that they had volunteered in SRCs prior to medical school. These students identified SRCs as meaningful venues for developing patient interaction skills and finding medical student and physician mentors. DISCUSSION: Prior to medical school matriculation, SRC experiences may be important experiential learning arenas, providing premedical students with an authentic clinical setting and access to mentors.

Premedical students' exposure to the pharmaceutical industry's marketing practices.

PURPOSE: Physicians' exposure to pharmaceutical industry marketing raises concerns about their ability to make unbiased, evidence-based prescription decisions. This exposure begins early in medical education. The authors examined the frequency and context of such exposures for students before matriculation to medical school. METHOD: The authors distributed two separate but related questionnaires to all 389 students who matriculated at the University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine between 2007 and 2010. The survey inquired about interactions with the pharmaceutical industry before entering medical school. Descriptive statistics and Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to analyze data. RESULTS: Across four years, 282 (72.5%) students responded to the first survey; 219 (56.3%) responded to the follow-up survey. The majority of those (62.1%) had interacted with or were exposed to pharmaceutical marketing before medical school. The most common interactions were accepting a pen (50.2%) and attending a sponsored lunch (37.9%), which occurred most commonly while shadowing (33.6% and 42.2%, respectively). The next most common interactions were receiving a small gift (24.7%) and attending a sponsored dinner (20.6%), which occurred most commonly in "other" contexts, such as through family and while working in a medical setting (48.2% and 48.9%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of students had interacted with the pharmaceutical industry before medical school. The differences in context indicate that students enter medical school with a heterogeneous set of exposures to pharmaceutical marketing. Medical schools should consider interventions to enhance students' knowledge of the impact of pharmaceutical marketing on physicians' prescribing practices.

When two worlds meet.

The author is one of four American premedical students traveled to India to spend a month with Pallium India (palliumindia.org) to learn about palliative care at Trivandrum Institute of Palliative Sciences, in the south Indian state of Kerala. The program was arranged by Child Family Health International (cfhi.org). They attended classroom sessions and joined the palliative care team during home visits and hospital consultations. They learned not just what palliative care is, but also how to understand and adapt to another culture. It was shocking to learn that all health care expenses are often out-of-pocket for most of the developing world and to see the extent of the suffering involved in life-limiting diseases. The students saw how the medical professional could adopt a basic and simple approach to medicine, acting as a mix of scientist, humanist, and spiritualist. She concludes that we in the United States too seem to be learning the value of such an approach and to make better use of available resources to improve the quality of life of those who are suffering.

Medical students' and prospective medical students' uncertainties about career intentions: cross-sectional and longitudinal studies.

BACKGROUND: Policy prompts medical students' earlier career awareness. AIM: To explore changes and uncertainty in medical (and prospective medical) students' career intentions in a 5-year problem-based curriculum. METHODS: Six postal questionnaire surveys of medical students and one survey of prospective medical students sought career intentions from three entry-cohorts (one also seeking why they chose medicine, and one, the reason for the career intention). RESULTS: From the 973 (91.4%) 2001/02 admission interviewees responding, 74/189 (39.2%) of those admitted and remaining 'in-year' re-reported career intentions 5 years later (2006/07). Of the 1999 entrants (start-Year 1; end-Year 1; and mid-Year 3) and 2001 entrants (start-Year 1 and end-Year 1), 61.2-77.9% responded. Up to mid-programme, only 9.5-18.8% reported general practice, significantly more of whom described altruistic reasons for choosing medicine (2001 entrants). Tracked longitudinally, career intentions stayed relatively stable, but a small significant retreat from general practice over Year 1 predated clinical placements. From pre-admission to mid-Year 5, uncertainty decreased significantly, but 14.9% replied 'do not know' both times. Significantly more prospective students from the least affluent English or Welsh postcodes specified a career intention. CONCLUSION: Many students might delay considering career intentions, particularly general practice. Socioeconomic determinants of early medical career decision making merit further study.

Racial-ethnic background and specialty choice: a study of U.S. medical school graduates in 1987.

This study used two Association of American Medical Colleges' questionnaires to determine whether there was a relationship between the racial-ethnic backgrounds and the specialty choices of a 1987 cohort of 11,136 U.S. medical school seniors, both prior to entering medical school and as they prepared for residency training. Their specialty preferences as premedical students were shown by their responses to the Premedical Student Questionnaire, administered when they registered for the Medical College Admission Test; their specialty choices at the end of their medical school training were shown by their responses to the Medical Student Graduation Questionnaire, which they completed shortly before graduation. Racial-ethnic backgrounds, self-recorded, were classified into black, other underrepresented minorities, Asian, other non-underrepresented minorities, and white. Specialties were clustered into primary care, medical specialties, surgical specialties, and supporting services. Before entering medical school, the students had similar specialty preferences regardless of background. As seniors in medical school, there was even greater convergence of specialty choices among the students of all backgrounds. Racial-ethnic background in itself appears not to have been a major factor influencing the senior medical students' specialty choices.