Alcohol Consumption among Samoan Adults in 2010: Patterns, Correlates and Health Implications.

AIMS: We aim to describe alcohol consumption and related problems from a nationwide survey in 2010 in Samoa in association with sociodemographic variables as part of an intervention development. METHODS: The sample consisted of 3463 adults, 25-65 years of age. Participants self-reported alcohol consumption in the previous 12 months, patterns of drinking and alcohol-related psychosocial problems. Data about age, census region of residence, highest attained education level, employment, marital status, household assets score and current smoking status were gathered. RESULTS: More than one-third of men, 36.1%, and 4.1% of women consumed alcohol in the past year. There were greater proportions of alcohol users among younger adults, <45 years, in both men and women. Among men, being unemployed and residing outside of rural Savai'i and smoking cigarettes were associated with current alcohol use. Among women, tertiary education and cigarette smoking were strongly associated with alcohol use. Among alcohol consumers, almost 75% of both men and women reported being drunk more than once in the prior month, and 58% of men and 81% of women drank heavily, consuming >4 drinks for women and >5 drinks for men at least once per episode in the prior week. More men than women, 51% versus 26%, felt that alcohol consumption had interfered with their daily life. CONCLUSION: Our analyses identified correlates of alcohol consumption and associated problems that can help guide the development of targeted interventions for different sex and age groups to mitigate the social and physiological harms of alcohol misuse.

A scientometric review of genome-wide association studies.

This scientometric review of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) from 2005 to 2018 (3639 studies; 3508 traits) reveals extraordinary increases in sample sizes, rates of discovery and traits studied. A longitudinal examination shows fluctuating ancestral diversity, still predominantly European Ancestry (88% in 2017) with 72% of discoveries from participants recruited from three countries (US, UK, Iceland). US agencies, primarily NIH, fund 85% and women are less often senior authors. We generate a unique GWAS H-Index and reveal a tight social network of prominent authors and frequently used data sets. We conclude with 10 evidence-based policy recommendations for scientists, research bodies, funders, and editors.

[23andMe and motion sickness]. / 23andMe et le mal des transports - Chroniques génomiques.

A Genome Wide Association Study on propensity to motion sickness published by 23andMe gives interesting results, shows validity for self-reported phenotypic information and underlines the value of the model developed by the company for customer participation in genetic studies.

Genetic analysis of complex disease--a roadmap to understanding or a colossal waste of money.

Billions of dollars are being invested by public and private agencies to study the human genome, with the ultimate goal of improving the diagnosis and treatment of human genetic disease. For monogenic disease, progress has been remarkable and for many of these, genetic discoveries have led to improved diagnosis, prevention and treatment. In contrast, for the much more common, complex diseases such as diabetes and cancer, progress has been far slower. Extensive media coverage caused naïve and unrealistically high expectations, which were followed by disappointment when dramatic results were not forthcoming rapidly. In fact, however, if one correctly assesses the complexity of the problem, progress has been exceptional. Using recently developed technology and huge genetic databases, rapid progress is expected in the coming decade. Even today, these studies are providing unique insights into the pathogenesis of complex disease, and these will undoubtedly be translated into additional tangible diagnostic or therapeutic tools in the coming years.

Disclosure of research results from cancer genomic studies: state of the science.

Although the cancer research community has supported a "nondisclosure" position about the return of individual results to research subjects, new technologies, such as genome wide association studies, will reveal clinically relevant findings, some of which cannot be ignored. What recommendations exist that can guide researchers and Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) about this issue? This article summarizes the relevant public documents about the disclosure of individual research results to inform policy development. Four stakeholder groups were selected to make this comparison: federal, professional, advisory, and advocacy groups. Regardless of a group's position on disclosure, there was consensus that if research results were to be disclosed under any condition, the results must be analytically and clinically validated and that the researcher should not make this decision alone, but in conjunction with the IRB. There was no consensus, however, on the specific determinants for disclosure or what constitutes clinical validity. Although sufficient agreement exists to begin developing general guidelines about the process for disclosure of individual research results, the actual determinants with which to guide this decision remain challenging. An alternate framework that addresses the threshold of uncertainty a stakeholder is willing to accept, the positive predictive value of the research finding, and the magnitude of harm of returning results may be more effective to guide decision making. These assessments, along with what is considered useful information, requires the involvement of the research subject community to inform decision-making and move the policy process forward.