Quantitative Assessment of Drug Efficacy and Emergence of Resistance in Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Using a Longitudinal Exposure-Tumor Growth Inhibition Model: Apitolisib (Dual PI3K/mTORC1/2 Inhibitor) Versus Everolimus (mTORC1 Inhibitor).

Cancer remains a significant global health challenge, and despite remarkable advancements in therapeutic strategies, poor tolerability of drugs (causing dose reduction/interruptions) and/or the emergence of drug resistance are major obstacles to successful treatment outcomes. Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) accounts for 2% of global cancer diagnoses and deaths. Despite the initial success of targeted therapies in mRCC, challenges remain to overcome drug resistance that limits the long-term efficacy of these treatments. Our analysis aim was to develop a semi-mechanistic longitudinal exposure-tumor growth inhibition model for patients with mRCC to characterize and compare everolimus (mTORC1) and apitolisib's (dual PI3K/mTORC1/2) ability to inhibit tumor growth, and quantitate each drug's efficacy decay caused by emergence of tumor resistance over time. Model-estimated on-treatment tumor growth rate constant was 1.7-fold higher for apitolisib compared to everolimus. Estimated half-life for loss of treatment effect over time for everolimus was 16.1 weeks compared to 7.72 weeks for apitolisib, suggesting a faster rate of tumor re-growth for apitolisib patients likely due to the emergence of resistance. Goodness-of-fit plots including visual predictive check indicated a good model fit and the model was able to capture individual tumor size-time profiles. Based on our knowledge, this is the first clinical report to quantitatively assess everolimus (mTORC1) and apitolisib (PI3K/mTORC1/2) efficacy decay in patients with mRCC. These results highlight the difference in overall efficacy of 2 drugs due to the quantified efficacy decay caused by emergence of resistance, and emphasize the importance of model-informed drug development for targeted cancer therapy.

Epidemiology of patients with lymphangioleiomyomatosis: A descriptive study using the national database of health insurance claims and specific health checkups of Japan.

BACKGROUND: Using patient registries or limited regional hospitalization data may result in underestimation of the incidence and prevalence of rare diseases. Therefore, we used the national administrative database to estimate the incidence and prevalence of lymphangioleiomyomatosis over six years (2014-2019) and describe changes in clinical practice and mortality. METHODS: We extracted data from the National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups of Japan between January 2013 and December 2020. This database covers ≥99% of the population. We used the diagnostic code for lymphangioleiomyomatosis to estimate the incidence and prevalence from 2014 to 2019. Additionally, we examined the demographic characteristics, treatments, comorbidities, and mortality of the patients. RESULTS: In women, the incidence and prevalence of lymphangioleiomyomatosis in 2019 were approximately 3 per 1,000,000 person-years and 28.7 per 1,000,000 persons, respectively. While, in men, the incidence and prevalence of lymphangioleiomyomatosis were <0.2 per 1,000,000 person-years and 0.8 per 1,000,000 persons, respectively. From 2014 to 2019, the proportion of prescriptions of sirolimus and everolimus increased, while the use of home oxygen therapy, chest drainage, comorbid pneumothorax, and bloody phlegm decreased. The mortality rate remained stable at approximately 1%. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence and prevalence of lymphangioleiomyomatosis were higher in women than those reported previously. Although the incidence did not change during the 6-year period, the prevalence gradually increased. Moreover, lymphangioleiomyomatosis was observed to be rare in men. The practice of treating patients with lymphangioleiomyomatosis changed across the six years while mortality remained low, at approximately 1%.

Does the induction immunotherapy (basiliximab) influence the early acute cellular rejection index after orthotopic heart transplantation?- Preliminary assessment report.

The study aimed to determine the influence of induction therapy on the acute cellular rejection (ACR) index in adult heart transplant recipients during the one-year observation. The study population consisted of 256 consecutive adult patients (pts), aged 51.5 (±11.9) years, 199 (77%) men treated with orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT) in the period between 2015 and 2020 in a single high-volume heart transplant center. The endomyocardial biopsies (EMBs) were performed according to the protocol consisting of 7 protocolary EMBs for up to 3 months and 10 EMBs for up to one year after OHT. The rejection index (ACRI) was calculated as the number of scheduled EMBs with the ACR ≥ 2 divided by the total number of protocolary EMBs. The study population was divided into two groups according to the application of basiliximab. The total number of pts. who received basiliximab was 10 (3.9%). The main indications for the usage of the induction therapy were heart retransplantation, mechanical circulatory support (MCS), severe renal insufficiency (eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m2), and a panel of reactive antibody (PRA) > 10%. In the group with induction, the mean age was 49 (±14) years; 3 (30%) patients had the MCS prior to OHT, and 3 (30%) patients had heart retransplantation. Four (40%) patients had diabetes mellitus, and 4 (40%) patients had severe renal insufficiency. As maintenance therapy during the observation period, tacrolimus was given to 10 (100%) patients, everolimus to 2 (20%) patients, and MPA to 9 (90%) patients. In the group with no induction, the mean age was 51.8 (±12) years, MCS was used in 56 (23%) patients, 2 (0.8%) patients were retransplanted; 10 (4%) patients had eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m2 and 58 (24%) patients had diabetes. Tacrolimus was administered to 243 (99%) patients, cyclosporine to 3 (1%), everolimus to 40 (16%), and mycophenolate to 245 (99.6%) heart recipients. The median one-year ACRI was 0.0, IQR:0.0-0.08 in the group with induction vs. 0.077, IQR: 0.0-0.154 with no induction; p = 0.11. ACRI up to three months was significantly higher in the entire cohort in comparison to up to one year (P < 0.01). The multivariate analysis showed that only everolimus implementation and younger age at the time of transplant influenced patients' mortality rate (P < 0.01). Significant graft rejections (≥ 2R ISHLT) are most common in the first three months after OHT. Patients who are initially at high risk of significant cellular rejection may benefit from induction therapy.

Is Palbociclib a cost-effective strategy in the second-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer in Iran?

BACKGROUND & AIMS: This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of Palbociclib in the second-line treatment of hormone receptor-positive (HR+) human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in Iran. METHODS: The present economic evaluation used a partitioned survival model (PSM). This model compares lifetime costs and disease outcomes among groups receiving different medication combinations containing Palbociclib, Fulvestrant, Everolimus, Ribociclib, and Abemaciclib as the second-line therapy for HR+/HER2- MBC. The model was conducted from Iran's healthcare perspective, structured with 1-month cycles, and the evaluation time horizon in the base analysis was set to 180 cycles (15 years). Transition probabilities were extracted using the survival curves. The cost information was extracted based on the year 2020. The Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALY) was considered the final outcome unit, and the cost-effectiveness of different combinations is calculated as cost per QALY. The annual discount rate of 5% was considered for costs and QALYs. Two times Iran's GDP per capita (800,000,000 IRR = US$5934) was used as the threshold. Finally, due to the uncertainty of some parameters, deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were carried out. RESULTS: The base case results showed that the highest cost was for the 'Ribociclib+ Fulvestrant' combination (US$89,629.56), and the lowest price was for the 'Iranian Everolimus + Fulvestrant' combination (US$10,740.09). 'Palbociclib + Fulvestrant' brings about the highest value of 1.456 incremental QALYs compared to other strategies. Finally, the 'Iranian Palbociclib + Fulvestrant' was the cost-effective combination, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of US$4,201 compared to other strategies. The base case results were supported by the probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Deterministic sensitivity analysis showed that the cost of Iranian Palbociclib has a threshold of US$582.99. CONCLUSIONS: The 'Iranian Palbociclib + Fulvestrant' combination was cost-effective in second-line therapy for HR+ HER2- MBC in Iran.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of cabozantinib compared with everolimus, axitinib, and nivolumab in subsequent line advanced renal cell carcinoma in Japan.

AIMS: The treatment landscape of renal cell carcinoma has changed with the introduction of targeted therapies. While the clinical benefit of cabozantinib is well-established for Japanese patients who have received prior treatment, the economic benefit remains unclear. The objective of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of cabozantinib compared with everolimus, axitinib, and nivolumab in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma who have failed at least one prior therapy in Japan. METHODS: A cost-effectiveness model was developed using a partitioned survival approach and a public healthcare payer's perspective. Over a lifetime horizon, clinical and economic implications were estimated according to a three-health-state structure: progression-free, post-progression, and death. Key clinical inputs and utilities were derived from the METEOR trial, and a de novo network meta-analysis and cost data were obtained from publicly available Japanese data sources. Costs, quality-adjusted life-years, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were estimated. Costs and health benefits were discounted annually at 2%. RESULTS: Cabozantinib was more costly and effective compared with everolimus and axitinib, with deterministic incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of ¥5,375,559 and ¥2,223,138, respectively. Compared to nivolumab, cabozantinib was predicted to be less costly and more effective. Sensitivity and scenario analyses demonstrated that the key drivers of cost-effectiveness results were the estimation of overall survival and treatment duration, relative efficacy, drug costs, and subsequent treatment costs. LIMITATIONS: METEOR was an international trial but did not enroll any patients from Japan. Efficacy and safety data from METEOR were used as a proxy for the Japanese population following validation by clinical experts, and alternative assumptions specific to clinical practice in Japan were evaluated in scenario analyses. CONCLUSIONS: In Japan, cabozantinib is a cost-effective alternative to everolimus, axitinib, and nivolumab for the treatment of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma who have received at least one prior line of therapy.

Angiography-Based Superficial Wall Strain of De Novo Stenotic Coronary Arteries: Serial Assessment of Vessels Treated with Bioresorbable Scaffold or Drug-Eluting Stent.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to present an angiography-based computational model for serial assessment of superficial wall strain (SWS, dimensionless) of de-novo coronary stenoses treated with either bioresorbable scaffold (BRS) or drug-eluting stent (DES). BACKGROUND: A novel method for SWS allows the assessment of the mechanical status of arteries in-vivo, which may help for predicting cardiovascular outcomes. METHODS: Patients with arterial stenosis treated with BRS (n = 21) or DES (n = 21) were included from ABSORB Cohort B1 and AIDA trials. The SWS analyses were performed along with quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) at pre-PCI, post-PCI, and 5-year follow-up. Measurements of QCA and SWS parameters were quantified at the treated segment and adjacent 5-mm proximal and distal edges. RESULTS: Before PCI, the peak SWS on the 'to be treated' segment (0.79 ± 0.36) was significantly higher than at both virtual edges (0.44 ± 0.14 and 0.45 ± 0.21; both p < 0.001). The peak SWS in the treated segment significantly decreased by 0.44 ± 0.13 (p < 0.001). The surface area of high SWS decreased from 69.97mm2 to 40.08mm2 (p = 0.002). The peak SWS in BRS group decreased to a similar extent (p = 0.775) from 0.81 ± 0.36 to 0.41 ± 0.14 (p < 0.001), compared with DES group from 0.77 ± 0.39 to 0.47 ± 0.13 (p = 0.001). Relocation of high SWS to device edges was often observed in both groups after PCI (35 of 82 cases, 41.7 %). At follow-up of BRS, the peak SWS remained unchanged compared to post-PCI (0.40 ± 0.12 versus 0.36 ± 0.09, p = 0.319). CONCLUSION: Angiography-based SWS provided valuable information about the mechanical status of coronary arteries. Device implantation led to a significant decrease of SWS to a similar extent with either polymer-based scaffolds or permanent metallic stents.

Assessment of the adverse effects of sirolimus versus everolimus in pediatric heart transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Literature is limited comparing adverse effects (AEs) of the proliferation signal inhibitors (PSIs) sirolimus (SRL) and everolimus (EVL) in pediatric heart transplant (HTx) recipients. METHODS: Single-center, observational cohort analysis assessing first use of SRL or EVL in pediatric HTx recipients <21 years of age with up to 2 years follow-up between 2009 and 2020. RESULTS: Eighty-seven patients were included, with 52 (59.8%) receiving EVL and 35 (40.2%) receiving SRL. Tacrolimus with PSI was the most common regimen. Intergroup comparison revealed lower baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and greater increase in eGFR from baseline to 6 months and latest follow-up in SRL cohort compared to EVL cohort. There was greater increase in HDL cholesterol in SRL cohort compared to EVL cohort. Intragroup analysis revealed eGFR and HDL cholesterol increased significantly within SRL cohort, triglycerides and glycosylated hemoglobin increased in EVL cohort, and LDL cholesterol and total cholesterol increased in both cohorts (all p < .05). There were no differences in hematological indices or rates of aphthous ulcers, effusions, or infections between cohorts. Incidence of proteinuria was not significantly different among those screened within cohorts. Of those included in our analysis, one patient in SRL cohort (2.9%) and two in EVL cohort (3.8%) had PSI withdrawn due to AE. CONCLUSION: Low-dose PSIs in calcineurin inhibitor minimization regimens appear well-tolerated with low withdrawal rate secondary to AE in pediatric HTx recipients. While incidence of most AE was similar between PSI, our results suggest EVL may be associated with less favorable metabolic impact than SRL in this population.

First-Line Lenvatinib Plus Pembrolizumab or Everolimus versus Sunitinib for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma: A United States-Based Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The CLEAR trial indicated that survival benefits were generated with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab (LP) or everolimus (LE) than with sunitinib for advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC). However, the high cost of immuno-target and dual-targeted treatment, we assessed the cost-effectiveness of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab or everolimus in the first-line setting for treatment of patients with aRCC from the United States (US) payers' perspective. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive Markov model was developed to evaluate the cost and effectiveness of LP or LE in first-line therapy for aRCC. We estimated life years (LYs), quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Utility values and direct costs related to the treatments were gathered from the published studies. Then, one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. Additional subgroup analyses were considered. RESULTS: Treatment with LP and LE provided an additional 0.67 QALYs (0.62 LYs) and 0.66 QALYs (0.90 LYs) compared with sunitinib, resulting in ICER of $131,656 per QALY and 201,928 per QALY, respectively. The most influential factor in this model was the cost of pembrolizumab with LP. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed there was a 58.97% and 28.91% probability that LP and LE were cost-effective at WTP values of $150,000 per QALY in the US. Subgroup analyses demonstrated that LP was more cost-effective for patients from Western Europe and North America, intermediate risk of the International risk group of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC), favorable and intermediate risk group of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) and PD-L1 combined positive score greater than or equal to 1%. CONCLUSION: From the perspective of the US payer, LP is a cost-effective option as first-line treatment for patients with aRCC at a WTP threshold of $150,000 per QALY, but LE is the opposite.

Use of mTOR inhibitors (rapalogs) for the treatment of skin changes in tuberous sclerosis complex.

BACKGROUND: Skin manifestations of Tuberous Sclerosis Complex (TSC) are present in more than 90% of patients. Facial angiofibromas (AF) are considered a skin hallmark of TSC. They are responsible for esthetic impact in patients. We aimed at reviewing the data available on the use of rapamycin (sirolimus) and everolimus for the oral or topical treatment of AF and other TSC-related skin changes and reporting our preliminary experience at Angers University Hospital. METHODS: The literature search has been performed in combining the terms "rapamycin", "sirolimus", "everolimus", "tuberous sclerosis complex", "skin" and "trial". We have splited the findings of the literature search into two parts: 1) the value of rapalogs used systemically for extracutaneous purposes and 2) the role of topical rapalogs used specifically for skin lesions. RESULTS: Large clinical trials using rapamycin or everolimus for the treatment of brain, lung or kidney manifestations of TSC unfortunately poorly define the "skin lesion response rate" they report. Conversely, the trials with topical rapamycin demonstrate significant, albeit transient, efficacy on AF size and visibility and acceptable tolerance. Several trials suggest better efficacy in younger patients than in adults. Long-term evaluation (up to 136 weeks) point to sustained response and good local and systemic tolerance. However, maintenance therapy appears to be mandatory to preserve skin response. Other skin changes, especially shagreen fibrotic plaques, hypomelanotic macules and ungual tumors still need far more research. Our experience in 124 patients (children and adults) treated for facial AF at Angers University Hospital showed that about 80% of them had an impressive and sustained response. CONCLUSION: The issues of cost and access to affordable topical rapamycin formulations are critical for the patients even if skin changes do not cause serious harm in the context of TSC. We strongly suggest to improve and standardize the formulation of topical rapamycin, to encourage the pharmaceutical industry for providing commercial products, and the Health systems (social welfare) to reimburse them. © 2022 French Society of Pediatrics. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Análise de custo-efetividade do uso de inibidores da via de sinalização mTOR x micofenolato em receptores de transplante renal sem profilaxia para citomegalovírus s / Cost-effectiveness analysis of the use of mTOR signaling pathway inhibitors x mycophenolate in kidney transplantation recipients without cytomegalovirus prophylaxis

Objetivo: Avaliar a relação de custo-efetividade dos regimes imunossupressores utilizados em pacientes receptores de transplante renal, no Hospital Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Juiz de Fora, MG, basiliximabe, micofenolato de sódio, tacrolimo e prednisona (Grupo 1 = 93 pacientes), comparados com a associação de timoglobulina, everolimo, tacrolimo e prednisona (Grupo 2 = 91 pacientes). Métodos: Para a análise farmacoeconômica, foi utilizado o modelo de Árvore de Decisão, desenvolvido no software Treeage Suite 2011. Foi considerada uma coorte real de pacientes submetidos ao transplante renal entre janeiro de 2013 e março de 2017, os quais foram acompanhados por um período de um ano, sendo mensurados os benefícios clínicos, bem como os custos associados, na perspectiva do Sistema Único de Saúde. O método de custeio utilizado foi o botton-up. Foram adotados os limiares de custo-efetividade (LCEs) equivalentes a 1 PIB per capita e 1 a 3 PIB, considerando o ano de 2017. Resultados: No que diz respeito à sobrevida, a RCEI foi de cerca de R$ 214.234,12 para 1 ano de vida ganho. Em relação aos eventos adversos, a RCEI foi de cerca de R$ 43.682,98 para 1 ano sem incidência de eventos adversos. Conclusões: Ao avaliar a sobrevida e a incidência de eventos adversos, timoglobulina+everolimo não é considerado custo-efetivo em relação ao esquema contendo basiliximabe+micofenolato de sódio diante do LCE de 1 PIB per capita. No entanto, ao adotarmos o LCE até 3 PIB per capita, o regime contendo moglobulina+everolimo é custo-efetivo, ultrapassando cerca de 38% do PIB per capita.

Objective: Evaluate the cost-effectiveness of immunosuppressive regimens used in kidney transplant recipients at the Santa Casa de Misericórdia, Hospital in Juiz de Fora, MG, compared with basiliximab, mycophenolate sodium, tacrolimus and prednisone (Group 1 = 93 patients) with the association of thymoglobulin, everolimus, tacrolimus and prednisone (Group 2 = 91 patients). Methods: For the pharmacoeconomic analysis, the Decision Tree model was used, developed in the TreeAge Suite 2011 software. A real cohort of patients undergoing kidney transplantation between January 2013 and March 2017 was considered, they were followed up for a period of 1 year, where the clinical benefits were measured, as well as the associated costs, from the perspective

Optical coherence tomography assessment of acute thrombogenicity at bifurcation sites using different stenting techniques: A porcine arteriovenous shunt study.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to compare bare-metal stents (BMS), durable-polymer everolimus-eluting stents (DP-EES), and abluminal biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stents (ABP-SES) in the bifurcation model setup. BACKGROUND: The mechanism of thrombogenicity, which differs among second-generation stents implanted using double-kissing (DK) crush or culotte stenting techniques, remains unclear. We have shown previously that setting up a porcine arteriovenous shunt model is feasible and useful to assess thrombogenicity at vessel bifurcation points. METHODS: Six porcine shunt models were prepared for the comparison between DK crush and culotte stenting techniques using BMS, DP-EES, and ABP-SES. Intracoronary imaging with high-resolution optical coherence tomography (OCT) was performed to evaluate the thrombogenicity in different stent types in the bifurcation stenting model and was evaluated by a core lab. RESULTS: Culotte stenting demonstrated more thrombogenicity at the proximal main branch (MB) with DP-EES, side branch (SB) with BMS, and the bifurcation site irrespective of the stent type, while DK crush technique exhibited thrombogenicity only at SB with BMS and ABP-SES. OCT analysis revealed malapposition of DP-EES in the proximal MB with culotte stenting. Stent expansion was generally larger in ABP-SES than BMS and DP-EES. CONCLUSIONS: The study provides hypothesis-generating findings in distinct thrombogenicity of bifurcation stenting with DP- or ABP-coated drug-eluting stents.

Experimental and computational assessment of the synergistic pharmacodynamic drug-drug interactions of a triple combination therapy in refractory HER2-positive breast cancer cells.

The development of innate and/or acquired resistance to human epidermal growth factor receptor type-2 (HER2)-targeted therapy in HER2-positive breast cancer (HER2 + BC) is a major clinical challenge that needs to be addressed. One of the main mechanisms of resistance includes aberrant activation of the HER2 and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/AKT8 virus oncogene cellular homolog/mammalian target of rapamycin (PI3K/Akt/mTOR) pathways. In the present work, we propose to use a triple combination therapy to combat this resistance phenomenon. Our strategy involves evaluation of two targeted small molecule agents, everolimus and dasatinib, with complementary inhibitory circuitries in the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway, along with a standard cytotoxic agent, paclitaxel. Everolimus inhibits mTOR, while dasatinib inhibits Src, which is a protein upstream of Akt. An over-activation of these two proteins has been implicated in approximately 50% of HER2 + BC cases. Hence, we hypothesize that their simultaneous inhibition may lead to enhanced cell-growth inhibition. Moreover, the potent apoptotic effects of paclitaxel may help augment the overall cytotoxicity of the proposed triple combination in HER2 + BC cells. To this end, we investigated experimentally and assessed computationally the in vitro pharmacodynamic drug-drug interactions of the various dual and triple combinations to assess their subsequent combinatorial effects (synergistic/additive/antagonistic) in a HER2-therapy resistant BC cell line, JIMT-1. Our proposed triple combination therapy demonstrated synergism in JIMT-1 cells, thus corroborating our hypothesis. This effort may form the basis for further investigation of the triple combination therapy in vivo at a mechanistic level in HER2-therapy resistant BC cells.

[177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE versus standard of care in adult patients with gastro-enteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP-NETs): a cost-consequence analysis from an Italian hospital perspective.

PURPOSE: To assess and compare clinical outcomes and costs, to the Italian healthcare system, of three therapeutic options approved in the management of adult patients with gastro-enteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP-NETs). METHODS: We compared the efficacy, safety, and costs of [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE, everolimus (both originator and generic products), and sunitinib in patients with advanced GEP-NETs (NET G1 and G2) that had progressed following treatment with somatostatin analogs (SSAs). A cost-consequence model was developed and validated by a panel of clinical experts from three NET reference centres in Italy. The clinical outcomes included in the model were median progression-free survival and the incidence of grade 3 or 4 adverse events (AEs), as reported in pivotal clinical trials. The costs for acquisition and administration of each treatment, and of managing AEs, were calculated from the perspective of the Italian national health service. Treatment costs per progression-free month were calculated separately for patients with NETs of pancreatic (PanNETs; all three treatments) and gastrointestinal (GI-NETs; [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE and everolimus only) origin. RESULTS: In patients with PanNETs, total costs per progression-free month were €2989 for [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE, €4975 for originator everolimus, €3472 for generic everolimus, and €5337 for sunitinib. In patients with GI-NETs, total costs per progression-free month were €3189 for [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE, €4990 for originator everolimus, and €3483 for generic everolimus. CONCLUSIONS: [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE was associated with lower costs per progression-free month versus relevant treatment options in patients with GI-NETs or PanNETs (NET G1-G2; progressed following SSA treatment), although acquisition and administration costs are higher. These findings provide further economic arguments in the overall context of treatment decision-making.

Development of an antiepileptogenesis drug screening platform: Effects of everolimus and phenobarbital.

OBJECTIVE: The kainic acid (KA)-induced status epilepticus (SE) model in rats is a well-defined model of epileptogenesis. This model closely recapitulates many of the clinical and pathological characteristics of human temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) that arise following SE or another neurological insult. Spontaneous recurrent seizures (SRS) in TLE can present after a latent period following a neurological insult (traumatic brain injury, SE event, viral infection, etc.). Moreover, this model is suitable for preclinical studies to evaluate the long-term process of epileptogenesis and screen putative disease-modifying/antiepileptogenic agents. The burden of human TLE is highly variable, similar to the post-KA SE rat model. In this regard, this model may have broad translational relevance. This report thus details the pharmacological characterization and methodological refinement of a moderate-throughput drug screening program using the post-KA-induced SE model of epileptogenesis in male Sprague Dawley rats to identify potential agents that may prevent or modify the burden of SRS. Specifically, we sought to demonstrate whether our protocol could prevent the development of SRS or lead to a reduced frequency/severity of SRS. METHODS: Rats were administered either everolimus (2-3 mg/kg po) beginning 1, 2, or 24 h after SE onset, or phenobarbital (60 mg/kg ip) beginning 1 h after SE onset. All treatments were administered once/day for 5-7 days. Rats in all studies (n = 12/treatment dose/study) were then monitored intermittently by video-electroencephalography (2 weeks on, 2 weeks off, 2 weeks on epochs) to determine latency to onset of SRS and disease burden. RESULTS: Although no adverse side effects were observed in our studies, no treatment significantly modified disease or prevented the presentation of SRS by 6 weeks after SE onset. SIGNIFICANCE: Neither phenobarbital nor everolimus administered at several time points after SE onset prevented the development of SRS. Nonetheless, we demonstrate a practical and moderate-throughput screen for potential antiepileptogenic agents in a rat model of TLE.

Direct Medical Costs of Advanced Breast Cancer Treatment: A Real-World Study in the Southeast of The Netherlands.

OBJECTIVES: Policy makers increasingly seek to complement data from clinical trials with information from routine care. This study aims to provide a detailed account of the hospital resource use and associated costs of patients with advanced breast cancer in The Netherlands. METHODS: Data from 597 patients with advanced breast cancer, diagnosed between 2010 and 2014, were retrieved from the Southeast Netherlands Advanced Breast Cancer Registry. Database lock for this study was in October 2017. We report the observed hospital costs for different resource categories and the lifetime costs per patient, adjusted for censoring using Lin's method. The relationship between patients' characteristics and costs was studied using multivariable regression. RESULTS: The average (SE) lifetime hospital costs of patients with advanced breast cancer were €52 709 (405). Costs differed considerably between patient subgroups, ranging from €29 803 for patients with a triple-negative subtype to €92 272 for patients with hormone receptor positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive cancer. Apart from the cancer subtype, several other factors, including age and survival time, were independently associated with patient lifetime costs. Overall, a large share of costs was attributed to systemic therapies (56%), predominantly to a few expensive agents, such as trastuzumab (15%), everolimus (10%), and bevacizumab (9%), as well as to inpatient hospital days (20%). CONCLUSIONS: This real-world study shows the high degree of variability in hospital resource use and associated costs in advanced breast cancer care. The presented resource use and costs data provide researchers and policy makers with key figures for economic evaluations and budget impact analyses.

Utilization of Mycophenolic Acid, Azathioprine, Tacrolimus, Cyclosporin, Sirolimus, and Everolimus: Multinational Study.

Background: Organ transplantations are difficult, complicated and very expensive interventions. In order to preserve the transplanted organs, it is necessary to provide medical care to the patients in terms of immunosuppression. According to the guidelines, the first-line therapy choices for achieving immunosuppression after transplantation are tacrolimus, cyclosporine, mycophenolic acid, azathioprine, sirolimus, everolimus" and corticosteroids. The aim of our study was to examine the utilization of this drugs in Montenegro and to compare the results with the ones from Finland, Croatia, and Serbia. Methods: In our investigation we used Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical/Defined Daily Dose (ATC/DDD) methodology. Prices per DDD of drugs are presented in euros (€). Results: In all observed countries, there is a positive trend in the consumption of all 6 drugs during the analyzed period. The prices per DDD of these drugs generally show a negative trend. Tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid in Montenegro recorded the largest reduction in the price per DDD. Price per one DDD of tacrolimus decreased from €13.28 in 2009 to €5.11 in 2019, thus by about 260%, and as regards mycophenolic acid, the price per one DDD decreased from €9.59 in 2009 to € 3.36 in 2019, thus by almost 300%. Conclusion: Despite the reduction in the price per DDD, drugs that are used as immunosuppressants are showing increasing costs from year to year. Since these drugs are expensive, they participate in a significant percentage in the budget for medicines in each country.

What Did Time Tell Us? A Comparison and Retrospective Validation of Different Survival Extrapolation Methods for Immuno-Oncologic Therapy in Advanced or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The immuno-oncologic (IO) mechanism of action may lead to an overall survival (OS) hazard that changes over time, producing shapes that standard parametric extrapolation methods may struggle to reflect. Furthermore, selection of the most appropriate extrapolation method for health technology assessment is often based on trial data with limited follow-up. OBJECTIVE: To examine this problem, we fitted a range of extrapolation methods to patient-level survival data from CheckMate 025 (NCT01668784, CM-025), a phase III trial comparing nivolumab with everolimus for previously treated advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC), to assess their predictive accuracy over time. METHODS: Six extrapolation methods were examined: standard parametric models, natural cubic splines, piecewise models combining Kaplan-Meier data with an exponential or non-exponential distribution, response-based landmark models, and parametric mixture models. We produced three database locks (DBLs) at minimum follow-ups of 15, 27, and 39 months to align with previously published CM-025 data. A three-step evaluation process was adopted: (1) selection of the distribution family for each method in each of the three DBLs, (2) internal validation comparing extrapolation-based landmark and mean survival with the latest CM-025 dataset (minimum follow-up, 64 months), and (3) external validation of survival projections using clinical expert opinion and long-term follow-up data from other nivolumab studies in aRCC (CheckMate 003 and CheckMate 010). RESULTS: All extrapolation methods, with the exception of mixture models, underestimated landmark and mean OS for nivolumab compared with CM-025 long-term follow-up data. OS estimates for everolimus tended to be more accurate, with four of the six methods providing landmark OS estimates within the 95% confidence interval of observed OS as per the latest dataset. The predictive accuracy of survival extrapolation methods fitted to nivolumab also showed greater variation than for everolimus. The proportional hazards assumption held for all DBLs, and a dependent log-logistic model provided reliable estimates of longer-term survival for both nivolumab and everolimus across the DBLs. Although mixture models and response-based landmark models provided reasonable estimates of OS based on the 39-month DBL, this was not the case for the two earlier DBLs. The piecewise exponential models consistently underestimated OS for both nivolumab and everolimus at clinically meaningful pre-specified landmark time points. CONCLUSIONS: This aRCC case study identified marked differences in the predictive accuracy of survival extrapolation methods for nivolumab but less so for everolimus. The dependent log-logistic model did not suffer from overfitting to early DBLs to the same extent as more complex methods. Methods that provide more degrees of freedom may accurately represent survival for IO therapy, particularly if data are more mature or external data are available to inform the long-term extrapolations.

Design and rationale of the XIENCE short DAPT clinical program: An assessment of the safety of 3-month and 1-month DAPT in patients at high bleeding risk undergoing PCI with an everolimus-eluting stent.

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is key for the prevention of recurrent ischemic events after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI); however, it increases the risk of bleeding complications. While new generation drug-eluting stents have been shown superior to bare-metal stents after a short DAPT course, the optimal DAPT duration in patients at high bleeding risk (HBR) remains to be determined. TRIAL DESIGN: The XIENCE Short DAPT program consists of three prospective, single-arm studies (XIENCE 90, XIENCE 28 Global and XIENCE 28 USA) investigating 3- or 1-month DAPT durations in HBR patients undergoing PCI with the XIENCE stent. The XIENCE 90 study is being conducted in the US and enrolled 2047 subjects who discontinued DAPT at 3 months if they were free from myocardial infarction (MI), repeat coronary revascularization, stroke, or stent thrombosis. The XIENCE 28 program includes the USA study, enrolling 642 patients in US and Canada, and the Global study, enrolling 963 patients in Europe and Asia. In XIENCE 28, patients were to discontinue DAPT at 1 month post-PCI if event-free. The primary hypothesis for both XIENCE 90 and XIENCE 28 is that a short DAPT regimen will be non-inferior to a conventional DAPT duration with respect to the composite of all-cause death or MI. Patients enrolled in the prospective multicenter post-market XIENCE V USA study will be used as historical control group in a stratified propensity-adjusted analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The XIENCE Short DAPT Program will provide insights into the safety and efficacy of 2 abbreviated DAPT regimens of 3- and 1-month duration in a large cohort of HBR patients undergoing PCI with the XIENCE stent.

Model-based assessment of pharmacokinetic changes of sunitinib, tacrolimus, and everolimus in a patient with metastatic renal cell carcinoma after renal transplantation.

The safety of the coadministration of sunitinib with tacrolimus and everolimus with regard to therapeutic drug monitoring has not been demonstrated. Here, we report a patient who showed high sunitinib concentrations, in addition to pharmacokinetic changes in tacrolimus and everolimus after sunitinib therapy. A living-donor renal transplant patient treated with tacrolimus and everolimus was diagnosed with pulmonary and pleural metastases of renal cell carcinoma. The patient received sunitinib therapy (37.5 mg/day, 2 weeks on and 1 week off). This patient exhibited a high total sunitinib concentration (sunitinib, 105.8 ng/mL; N-desethyl sunitinib, 27.9 ng/mL) on day 10 postinitiation and experienced grade 3 diarrhea. The observed sunitinib concentrations were a little higher than those reported in the 421C>A polymorphism of the ATP-binding cassette subfamily G member 2 gene carrier. The observed concentrations of both tacrolimus and everolimus gradually decreased compared with the Bayesian-predicted values after the onset of sunitinib therapy, and the doses of tacrolimus and everolimus were increased. Careful therapeutic drug monitoring of sunitinib, tacrolimus, and everolimus concentrations is necessary during combination therapy, especially after episodes of diarrhea.

Ex vivo assessment of targeted therapies in a rare metastatic epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma.

Epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma (EMC) is a rare subtype of salivary gland neoplasms. Since the initial description of the cancer, just over 300 cases have been reported. EMCs occupy a biphasic cellular differentiation-state defined by the constitution of two cell types representing epithelial and myoepithelial lineages, yet the functional consequence of the differentiation-state heterogeneity with respect to therapy resistance of the tumors remains unclear. The reported local recurrence rate of the cases is approximately 30%, and while distant metastases are rare, a significant fraction of these cases are reported to receive no survival benefit from radio- or chemotherapy given in addition to surgery. Moreover, no targeted therapies have been reported for these neoplasms. We report here the first use and application of ex vivo drug screening together with next generation sequencing to assess targeted treatment strategies for a rare metastatic epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma. Results of the ex vivo drug screen demonstrate significant differential therapeutic sensitivity between the epithelial and myoepithelial intra-tumor cell lineages suggesting that differentiation-state heterogeneity within epithelial-myoepithelial carcinomas may present an outlet to partial therapeutic responses to targeted therapies including MEK and mTOR inhibitors. These results suggest that the intra-tumor lineage composition of EMC could be an important factor to be assessed when novel treatments are being evaluated for management of metastatic EMC.