Ultrasound feedback training increases trainee accuracy in vaginal assessment of fetal head position in labor.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of an immediate ultrasound feedback intervention on trainee accuracy in vaginal-examination-based assessment of fetal head position. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study conducted at a single tertiary care center. Six third-year and six fourth-year residents in an obstetrics and gynecology residency training program were the study subjects. The third-year residents underwent a training intervention in which they assessed fetal head position by transvaginal digital examination and then received immediate feedback through ultrasound demonstration of the actual position. All examinations were performed in women with a singleton gestation ≥ 35 weeks and cervical dilation ≥ 8 cm, following rupture of membranes. The comparison groups were third-year residents before, during and after training and fourth-year residents who were not exposed to the training intervention. The primary outcome was the difference in accuracy of fetal-head-position assessment on vaginal examination by third-year residents before and after ultrasound feedback training. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors associated with digital examination accuracy. RESULTS: Overall, 390 examinations were performed. The accuracy of fetal-head-position assessments of third-year residents was 55% (53/96) before training, 65% (74/114) during training and 70% (63/90) after training, while that of fourth-year residents who did not undergo training was 52% (47/90) (P = 0.04). Fourth-year residents who did not undergo ultrasound training demonstrated similar baseline accuracy to that of third-year residents pretraining (52% (47/90) vs 55% (53/96), P = 0.68), but had significantly lower accuracy than had the third-year residents post-training (52% (47/90) vs 70% (63/90); P = 0.01). Multivariable analysis revealed a positive association between ultrasound feedback training and the ability to assess accurately fetal head position. After adjusting for the variables included in the final model, examinations performed by third-year residents pretraining and those performed by fourth-year residents who did not undergo training were less likely to be accurate than those performed by third-year residents post-training (adjusted odds ratio, 0.48 (95% CI, 0.26-0.91) and 0.42 (95% CI, 0.22-0.80), respectively). CONCLUSION: Immediate ultrasound feedback training increased trainee accuracy in vaginal assessment of fetal head position in labor. Its integration into obstetric training programs should be considered. Copyright © 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting-Pediatric Physician Knowledge, Training, and General Practice Approach.

Female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) is outlawed in much of the world but still mainly occurs from infancy-age 15. Many at-risk and FGM/C-affected girls live in the US. No standard pediatric training exists. A questionnaire assessing FGM/C education, knowledge, diagnostic confidence and external genital examination (EGE) approach was sent to pediatric listservs at 3 hospitals and a child abuse pediatrician (CAP) network. Analysis used χ2 and Fisher's exact tests. Compared to general pediatricians, CAP reported more FGM/C education (RR 2.0 [95% CI 1.3-3.2]), awareness of ICD-9/10 codes (RR 3.2 [95% CI 1.4-7.3]), confidence in identifying sub-types (RR 4.5 [95% CI 2.3-8.7]) and discussing FGM/C (RR 4.2 [95% CI 2.3-7.6]). For 6-12 month olds, 10% of general pediatricians reported never performing EGE at female well child visits (WCV), increasing to > 50% for 17-18 year olds. Pediatric physicians are not trained to diagnose or manage FGM/C. EGE are not done at WCVs and FGM/C diagnoses are missed.

Vaginal assessment and expedited amniotomy in oral misoprostol labor induction in nulliparas: a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Labor is induced in 20-30% of maternities, with an increasing trend of use. Labor induction with oral misoprostol is associated with reduced risk of cesarean deliveries and has a safety and effectiveness profile comparable to those of mechanical methods such as Foley catheter use. Labor induction in nulliparous women continues to be challenging, with the process often quite protracted. The eventual cesarean delivery rate is high, particularly when the cervix is unfavorable and ripening is required. Vaginal examination can cause discomfort and emotional distress particularly to nulliparous women, and plausibly can affect patient satisfaction with the induction and birth process. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate regular (4-hourly prior to each oral misoprostol dose with amniotomy when feasible) compared with restricted (only if indicated) vaginal assessments during labor induction with oral misoprostol in term nulliparous women MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a randomized trial between November 2016 and September 2017 in a university hospital in Malaysia. Our oral misoprostol labor induction regimen comprised 50 µg of misoprostol administered 4 hourly for up to 3 doses in the first 24 hours. Participants assigned to regular assessment had vaginal examinations before each 4-hourly misoprostol dose with a view to amniotomy as soon as it was feasible. Participants in the restricted arm had vaginal examinations only if indicated. Primary outcomes were patient satisfaction with the birth process (using an 11-point visual numerical rating scale), induction to vaginal delivery interval, and vaginal delivery rate at 24 hours. RESULTS: Data from 204 participants (101 regular, 103 restricted) were analyzed. The patient satisfaction score with the birth process was as follows (median [interquartile range]): 7 [6-9] vs 8 [6-10], P = .15. The interval of induction to vaginal delivery (mean ± standard deviation) was 24.3 ± 12.8 vs 31.1 ± 15.0 hours (P = .013). The vaginal delivery rate at 24 hours was 27.7% vs 20.4%; (relative risk [RR], 1.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.8-2.3; P = .14) for the regular vs restricted arms, respectively. The cesarean delivery rate was 50% vs 43% (RR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.9-1.5; P = .36). When assessed after delivery, participants' fidelity to their assigned vaginal examination schedule in a future labor induction was 45% vs 88% (RR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.4-0.7; P < .001), and they would recommend their assigned schedule to a friend (47% vs 87%; RR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.5-0.7; P < .001) in the regular compared with the restricted arms, respectively. CONCLUSION: Despite a shorter induction to vaginal delivery interval with regular vaginal examination and a similar vaginal delivery rate at 24 hours and birth process satisfaction score, women expressed a higher preference for the restricted examination schedule and were more likely to recommend such a schedule to a friend.

The feasibility and accuracy of ultrasound assessment in the labor room.

Objective: Vaginal examination is widely used to assess the progress of labor; however, it is subjective and poorly reproducible. We aim to assess the feasibility and accuracy of transabdominal and transperineal ultrasound compared to vaginal examination in the assessment of labor and its progress. Methods: Women were recruited as they presented for assessment of labor to a tertiary inner city maternity service. Paired vaginal and ultrasound assessments were performed in 192 women at 24-42 weeks. Fetal head position was assessed by transabdominal ultrasound defined in relation to the occiput position transformed to a 12-hour clock face; fetal head station defined as head-perineum distance by transperineal ultrasound; cervical dilatation by anterior to posterior cervical rim measurement and caput succedaneum by skin-skull distance on transperineal ultrasound. Results: Fetal head position was recorded in 99.7% (298/299) of US and 51.5% (154/299) on vaginal examination (p < .0001 1 ). Bland-Altman analysis showed 95% limits of agreement, -5.31 to 4.84 clock hours. Head station was recorded in 96.3% (308/320) on vaginal examination (VE) and 95.9% (307/320) on US (p = .79 1 ). Head station and head perineum distance were negatively correlated (Spearman's r = -.57, p < .0001). 54.4% (178/327) of cervical dilatation measurements were determined using US and 100% on VE/speculum (p < .0001). Bland-Altman analysis showed 95% limits of agreement -2.51-2.16 cm. The presence of caput could be assessed in 98.4% (315/320) of US and was commented in 95.3% (305/320) of VEs, with agreement for the presence of caput of 76% (p < .05). Fetuses with caput greater than 10 mm had significantly lower head station (p < .0001). Conclusions: We describe comprehensive ultrasound assessments in the labor room that could be translated to the assessment of women in labor. Fetal head position is unreliably determined by vaginal examination and agrees poorly with US. Head perineum distance has a moderate correlation with fetal head station in relation to the ischial spines based on vaginal examination. Cervical dilatation is not reliably assessed by ultrasound except at dilatations of less than 4 cm. Caput is readily quantifiable by ultrasound and its presence is associated with lower fetal head station. Transabdominal and transperineal ultrasound is feasible in the labor room with an accuracy that is generally greater than vaginal examinations.

Development of a standardized, reproducible screening examination for assessment of pelvic floor myofascial pain.

BACKGROUND: Pelvic floor myofascial pain is common, but physical examination methods to assess pelvic floor muscles are defined poorly. We hypothesized that a simple, transvaginal pelvic floor examination could be developed that would be highly reproducible among providers and would adequately screen for the presence of pelvic floor myofascial pain. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to develop a simple, reproducible pelvic floor examination to screen for pelvic floor myofascial pain. STUDY DESIGN: A screening examination was developed by Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery subspecialists and women's health physical therapists at our institution and tested in a simulated patient. We recruited 35 new patients who underwent examinations by blinded, paired, independent examiners. Agreement was calculated with the use of percent agreement and Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. RESULTS: The final examination protocol begins with examination of the following external sites: bilateral sacroiliac joints, medial edge of the anterior superior iliac spine, and cephalad edge of the pubic symphysis (self-reported pain: yes/no). The internal examination follows with palpation of each muscle group in the center of the muscle belly, then along the length of the muscle proceeding counter-clockwise: right obturator internus, right levator ani, left levator ani, left obturator internus (pain on a scale of 0-10). Thirty-five patients were enrolled. Correlation was high at each external (0.80-0.89) and internal point (0.63-0.87; P<.0001). CONCLUSION: Our newly developed, standardized, reproducible examination incorporates assessment of internal and external points to screen for pelvic floor myofascial pain. The examination is straightforward and reproducible and allows for easy use in clinical practice.

Cost-effective analysis of teaching pelvic examination skills using Gynaecology Teaching Associates (GTAs) compared with manikin models (The CEAT Study).

OBJECTIVE: To determine the cost-effectiveness of Gynaecology Teaching Associate (GTA) teaching versus conventional pelvic model (manikin) teaching of pelvic examination skills for final year medical students within a UK undergraduate obstetrics and gynaecology (O&G) curriculum. METHODS: An economic evaluation was carried out alongside a randomised controlled trial involving 492 final year medical students. 240 students received manikin teaching, and 241 GTA-led teaching. 418 (85%) students completed their assessment. Proficiency in gynaecological pelvic examination on GTAs was estimated by a senior clinical examiner, blinded to the method of teaching, using a standardised assessment tool. University of Birmingham Medical School thresholds were applied to determine proficiency levels; competence (pass) 50%, merit 60% and distinction 70%. Costs incurred in the delivery of both the educational pathways (control and intervention) were combined. All costs are reported in 2013-2014 prices and earlier costs adjusted using inflation indices. OUTCOME MEASURES: Cost per student competent in pelvic examination at completion of a 5-week clinical O&G placement. RESULTS: GTA teaching was more effective compared with conventional teaching with 12 more students considered competent at pass level and 28 more students competent at merit and distinction levels, respectively. However, the average cost of GTA teaching was £45.06 per student compared with £7.40 per student for conventional teaching, with an increased cost of £37.66 per student. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio demonstrated that it cost an additional £640.20 per competent student and £274.37 per student competent at merit level and £274.37 at distinction level compared with conventional manikin-based teaching. CONCLUSIONS: GTA teaching of female pelvic examination at the start of undergraduate medical student O&G clinical placements is shown to cost more and be more effective. GTA teaching is likely to be considered cost-effective in the context of other tests, and over the lifespan of a competent doctor's career. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01944592.

Anterior compartment descent: A new measure in the assessment of urethral hypermobility in women with urinary incontinence.

OBJECTIVES: To introduce a new, simple, non-invasive test to quantify urethral hypermobility. METHODS: We reviewed data of women with urinary incontinence who were examined at the Department for General Gynaecology and Urogynaecology, Clinic for Gynaecology and Perinatology, Maribor, Slovenia, between October 2010 and March 2014. Patients' age, diagnosis, results of the Q-tip test and Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification measurements were collected. In addition, a new parameter was defined as anterior compartment descent, a midline distance between the external urethral meatus and maximum descent of the anterior vaginal wall when performed the Valsalva maneuver. Statistical analysis was performed with spss software using the Mann-Whitney test, correlation, regression and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. The analysis was also carried out separately for patients with anterior compartment prolapse stage 0 or I. RESULTS: A total of 472 women were included, 323 of them with anterior compartment prolapse stage 0 or I. Women with urethral hypermobility had significantly higher anterior compartment descent values than patients without urethral hypermobility (3.7 cm vs 2.6 cm, P < 0.001). A moderate correlation was found between anterior compartment descent and the Q-tip test (Spearman's rho = 0.55, P < 0.001). Age and anterior compartment descent were identified as independent variables for the presence of urethral hypermobility. When the cut-off value is set at 3.5 cm, anterior compartment descent represents a test for urethral hypermobility assessment with sensitivity of 65.2%, specificity of 88.6%, positive predictive value of 97.0% and negative predictive value of 30.7%. Anterior compartment descent values were also significantly higher in patients with anterior compartment prolapse stage 0 or I (3.4 ± 0.7 cm vs 2.6 ± 0.7 cm, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The anterior compartment descent could be a valuable tool for the assessment of urethral hypermobility. Further effort should be directed into the standardization of the technique, determination of the normal range of anterior compartment descent, and its intra- and interobserver reliability.

The Annual Gynecologic Examination Updated for the 21st Century.

The concept of an annual gynecologic screening visit to identify disease at an early stage has long been an established component of women's health care. Women and their health care providers have historically accepted the schedule of an annual gynecologic examination with cervical cancer screening and a pelvic examination. Recently, researchers questioned the value of the annual breast and pelvic examinations in asymptomatic women and re-established the intervals for Pap test screening with the addition of human papillomavirus co-testing to establish cervical cancer risk. The updated well woman examination is now an opportunity to engage women in health education, screening for chronic disease risks, and health care concerns such as depression and violence.

Digital assessment and quantification of pelvic organ prolapse (DPOP-Q): a randomised cross-over diagnostic agreement trial.

INTRODUCTION: Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) system, measured in centimetres using a ruler (e.g. POPstix®), is recommended to quantify prolapse severity. POPstix® are costly (US $1/ruler). Home-made devices are used instead, but these have not been shown to be reproducible. HYPOTHESIS: Digitally assessed POP-Q (DPOP-Q) is as reliable, reproducible and acceptable as POP-Q assessed using POPstix®. METHODS: In this randomised crossover diagnostic agreement trial, each assessor measured the index finger of their dominant hand using a ruler. At visit one, patients were randomised to either POPstix® POP-Q assessment in a modified lithotomy position or DPOP-Q in both modified a lithotomy and a standing position. After the first clinician conducted this assessment, a second blinded clinician then carried out the remaining assessment on the same patient. For each examination, duration was recorded, along with a patient-completed discomfort score. Twenty-five women were invited for visit two, at which DPOP-Q was recorded by the same clinician who undertook DPOP-Q at the first visit. This allowed evaluation of inter- and intraobserver agreement together with examination acceptability. RESULTS: One hundred and nine women were recruited [median age 55 years, parity 2, body mass index (BMI) 27.1]. Of the 25 patients invited, 23 returned for visit two. DPOP-Q had high interobserver reliability [κ = 0.94, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.878-0.996] and intraobserver reliability (α = 0.96) with POPstix®. DPOP-Q was significantly quicker (p = 0.02) and less uncomfortable (p < 0.01) than POPstix® POP-Q. CONCLUSION: DPOP-Q is reliable, acceptable and cost effective.

Behavioural and physiological assessment of stress reactions during vaginal examination in dairy cows.

OBJECTIVES AND AIM: The objective of this study was to determine the origin of an arched back in cows during vaginal examination. Moreover, we tested whether the duration of an arched back and avoidance reactions during vaginal examination can be decreased by epidural anaesthesia or analgesic treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Behaviour during cleaning of the perivaginal region and during vaginal examination was scored using the avoidance reactivity score (ARS). Heart rate (HR) was recorded in 10 dairy cows considering four experimental phases, i.e. baseline, cleaning the perivaginal region, vaginal examination and post-examination. Each cow was examined three times and received no treatment (CON), an epidural anaesthesia (EPID) or an analgesic treatment (NSAID). The duration of an arched back during and post-examination was measured. RESULTS: The expression of the arched back was shortest in cows of group EPID and longest in cows of group CON. Avoidance reactions did not differ between the cleaning phase and vaginal examination in cows of group EPID. Cows of group CON showed the strongest avoidance reactions during examination, whereas cows of group EPID showed least avoidance reactions. Mean HR increased during cleaning and vaginal examination and decreased post-examination. Mean HR during vaginal examination did not differ between treatment groups. CONCLUSION: The results show that cows express discomfort during vaginal examination with an increase in avoidance reactions and HR. Although epidural anaesthesia could reduce sensitivity in the perivaginal region, cows still felt the urge to empty the vagina from the examiner's hand and, thus, were arching their back. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In practice, routine vaginal examinations in dairy cows have not been considered as invasive examina- tions. Our results show that vaginal examinations indeed do cause discomfort. We do not suggest the application of any anaesthetic treatment as appropriate before routine vaginal examinations. Nonetheless, the examiner should be aware of the stress potential of vaginal examinations and conduct such examinations most carefully.

Gynaecological assessment and history taking.

Nurse practitioners (NPs) rarely undertake gynaecological histories or female genital examinations yet, by doing so, they can broaden their scope of practice. This article discusses what NPs should ask women about their gynaecological histories and how to undertake pelvic examinations, and reviews common gynaecological symptoms. Further articles will cover different aspects of the pelvic examination and potential differential diagnoses.

Association between ultrasound-based assessment of fetal head station and clinically assessed cervical dilatation.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the association between ultrasound-based determination of fetal head station and clinical assessment of cervical dilatation during active labor. METHODS: From 427 women with singleton uncomplicated term pregnancies we obtained, during the active phase of labor, 907 pairs of measurements. Fetal head station and position were determined using the LaborPro system, based on position tracking and ultrasound imaging technology, and degree of cervical dilatation was determined by digital vaginal examination. The association between them was analyzed. RESULTS: The overall correlation between cervical dilatation and fetal head station was 0.64 (P < 0.001). Complete dilatation was observed in 78% of women with fetal head engagement, and in all women with a fetal head station of + 1.5 or more. CONCLUSIONS: There is good association between non-invasive ultrasound-based determination of fetal head station and clinically assessed cervical dilatation.