A UK Single-Center, Retrospective, Noninterventional Study of Clinical Outcomes and Costs of Two BotulinumtoxinA Treatments for Limb Spasticity.

Service model changes at the North Staffordshire Rehabilitation Centre (UK) included switching spasticity treatment from onabotulinumtoxinA (onaBoNT-A) to abobotulinumtoxinA (aboBoNT-A). This noninterventional, retrospective, longitudinal study (NCT04396704) describes the clinical and economic outcomes in toxin-naive adults with spasticity who received onaBoNT-A (Cohort 1; 2015-2017) or aboBoNT-A (Cohort 2; 2017-2019). Outcomes included Goal Attainment Scale T (GAS-T) score, treatment satisfaction, quality of life (QoL; EQ-5D visual analog scale [VAS] score), and treatment costs. Adverse events were recorded for Cohort 2. Cohort 1 included 60 patients (mean [standard deviation] dose, 206.0 [98.8] U); Cohort 2 included 54 patients (753.7 [457.3] U). Mean (95% confidence interval) GAS-T scores for Cohorts 1 and 2 were 43.1 (39.3-46.9) and 47.8 (43.7-51.9) at Week 6, and 43.2 and 44.3 at Week 12, respectively. In both cohorts most patients were satisfied with treatment. At Week 12, QoL had not changed in Cohort 1 but had improved in Cohort 2 (EQ-5D VAS, -5). Mean estimated per-patient costs (in 2021) for Cohorts 1 and 2 were £315.56 and £249.25, respectively, at Week 6, and £343.20 and £273.21, respectively, at Week 12. Fifteen non-treatment-related serious adverse events and two deaths were recorded. These data may warrant a larger prospective study powered to compare outcomes of aboBoNT-A and onaBoNT-A.

Integrative Assessment for Optimizing Aesthetic Outcomes When Treating Glabellar Lines With Botulinum Toxin Type A: An Appreciation of the Role of the Frontalis.

Despite the perception that treatment of glabellar lines with botulinum toxin A is straightforward, the reality is that the glabellar region contains a number of interrelated muscles. To avoid adverse outcomes, practitioners need to appreciate how treatment of 1 facial muscle group influences the relative dominance of others. In particular, practitioners need to understand the independent role of the frontalis in eyebrow outcomes and the potential for negative outcomes if the lower frontalis is unintentionally weakened by botulinum toxin A treatment. In addition, practitioners must recognize how inter-individual variation in the depth, shape, and muscle fiber orientation among the upper facial muscles can affect outcomes. For optimal results, treatment of the glabellar complex requires a systematic and individualized approach based on anatomical principles of opposing muscle actions rather than a one-size-fits-all approach. This review provides the anatomical justification for the importance of an integrated assessment of the upper facial muscles and eyebrow position prior to glabellar treatment. In addition, a systematic and broad evaluation system is provided that can be employed by practitioners to more comprehensively assess the glabellar region in order to optimize outcomes and avoid negatively impacting resting brow position and dynamic brow movement.

Skeletal muscle relaxant drug-drug-drug interactions and unintentional traumatic injury: Screening to detect three-way drug interaction signals.

AIM: The aim of this study was to identify skeletal muscle relaxant (SMR) drug-drug-drug interaction (3DI) signals associated with increased rates of unintentional traumatic injury. METHODS: We conducted automated high-throughput pharmacoepidemiologic screening of 2000-2019 healthcare data for members of United States commercial and Medicare Advantage health plans. We performed a self-controlled case series study for each drug triad consisting of an SMR base-pair (i.e., concomitant use of an SMR with another medication), and a co-dispensed medication (i.e., candidate interacting precipitant) taken during ongoing use of the base-pair. We included patients aged ≥16 years with an injury occurring during base-pair-exposed observation time. We used conditional Poisson regression to calculate adjusted rate ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for injury with each SMR base-pair + candidate interacting precipitant (i.e., triad) versus the SMR-containing base-pair alone. RESULTS: Among 58 478 triads, 29 were significantly positively associated with injury; confounder-adjusted RRs ranged from 1.39 (95% CI = 1.01-1.91) for tizanidine + omeprazole with gabapentin to 2.23 (95% CI = 1.02-4.87) for tizanidine + diclofenac with alprazolam. Most identified 3DI signals are new and have not been formally investigated. CONCLUSION: We identified 29 SMR 3DI signals associated with increased rates of injury. Future aetiologic studies should confirm or refute these SMR 3DI signals.

Assessment of the effects of sugammadex on coagulation profiles using thromboelastographic parameters.

This study evaluated the effects of sugammadex at conventional doses of 2 and 4 mg/kg on the coagulation profile by analyzing thromboelastographic parameters and performing a traditional laboratory coagulation analysis. A total of 100 patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery were enrolled. The patients were randomly divided into the 2 mg and 4 mg groups. The laboratory coagulation test and thromboelastographic analysis were performed before and 15 min after administering sugammadex. Prothrombin time (PT) was significantly prolonged after sugammadex administration than before it in intragroup comparisons of the 2 mg group (12.8 ± 0.6 s vs. 13.6 ± 0.7 s, p < 0.001) and the 4 mg group (13.0 ± 0.5 s vs. 13.7 ± 0.5 s, p < 0.001). R time, derived from thromboelastography, was also significantly prolonged after sugammadex administration (4.7 ± 1.8 min vs. 5.8 ± 2.1 min, p = 0.005). In conclusion, the conventional doses of 2 or 4 mg/kg sugammadex prolonged PT. Sugammadex 4 mg/kg also prolonged R time, although the value was within the normal range. Therefore, physicians should be cautious with the higher sugammadex dose, particularly in patients with a high risk of bleeding because the higher dose was associated with less coagulation.Trial registration: KCT0002133 (https://cris.nih.go.kr).

Amifampridine for the Management of Lambert-Eaton Myasthenic Syndrome: A New Take on an Old Drug.

Objective: The purpose of this article is to review the literature for both 3,4-diaminopyridine (3,4-DAP) and amifampridine for the treatment of Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS). Amifampridine (Firdapse) is the salt form of 3,4-DAP and was approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of LEMS. Data Sources: PubMed, TRIP database, and EMBASE searches were conducted without a back date (current to June 2019) utilizing the following search terms: amifampridine, 3,4-diaminopyridine, and Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome. Completed trials were also reviewed at clinicaltrials.gov. Study Selection and Data Extraction: Criteria for article inclusion consisted of human subjects, age ≥18 years, phase II or III clinical trials, and English language for both drugs. Observational and pharmacokinetic studies for amifampridine were also included. Data Synthesis: Prior to the approval of amifampridine, 3,4-DAP was first-line for the management of LEMS symptoms. Two phase III trials have evaluated amifampridine to confirm efficacy, both showing superiority over placebo in the management of LEMS symptoms, with minimal adverse effects. A significant improvement in both quantitative myasthenia gravis scores and Subjective Global Impression scores was established at days 4 and 14. Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice: With an improved stability profile and decreased dose variability, amifampridine will likely assume the role of first-line management of LEMS. Conclusions: Amifampridine has been shown to improve symptoms of LEMS and is generally well tolerated.

Long-term treatment of blepharospasm with botulinum toxin A: a service-based study over a 16-year follow-up in southern China.

OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the effect of long-term treatment with botulinum toxin A (BTX-A) for blepharospasm. Prevalence data and clinical features in southern China and influencing factors for selecting BTX-A treatment were explored. METHODS: We collected data retrospectively from 338 consecutive patients diagnosed with blepharospasm over 16 years to assess prevalence data and clinical features. Thereafter, all patients were classified into BTX-A (n = 135) or non-BTX-A (n = 203) treatment groups according to the patients' requests in order to explore the factors influencing whether BTX-A treatment was chosen. Furthermore, dynamic follow-up data were analyzed to evaluate the long-term efficacy in the BTX-A group. RESULTS: The prevalence was 23.3 per million, with an onset age of 50.3 ± 12.3 years and a female:male ratio of 2.4:1; the most common symptom was excessive blinking (91.2%). The symptom severity and psychological assessment scores were significantly decreased by treatment with BTX-A (p < 0.01), and there was no significant difference in response duration with the prolongation of BTX-A injections. Adverse events occurred 52 times (5.0%) among 1038 injections. The symptom severity and psychological assessment scores and the occurrence of eye-opening difficulty were higher, and medical expenses and the symptom tolerability rate were lower in the BTX-A group than in the non-BTX-A group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The onset age was earlier than that in Western countries. However, starting BTX-A treatment early is justified, even though a higher dosage was needed to maintain reliable long-term efficacy. Additionally, symptom severity and medical expenses are the primary factors affecting whether patients select BTX-A treatment.

Assessment of Skin Physiology Change and Safety After Intradermal Injections With Botulinum Toxin: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Split-Face Pilot Study in Rosacea Patients With Facial Erythema.

BACKGROUND: Botulinum toxin (BTX) has been used cosmetically with good clinical efficacy and tolerable safety. OBJECTIVE: This randomized, double-blind, split-face clinical study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of intradermal BTX in patients with rosacea. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four participants were enrolled and randomly given intradermal injections of BTX and normal saline in both cheeks. Clinician Erythema Assessment (CEA) score, Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) score, skin hydration, transepidermal water loss (TEWL), melanin content, erythema index, elasticity, and sebum secretions were evaluated at baseline and 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks. RESULTS: On the BTX-treated side, the CEA score significantly decreased and the GAIS score significantly increased. The erythema index decreased at Weeks 4 and 8. Skin elasticity was improved at Weeks 2 and 4 and skin hydration, at Weeks 2, 4, and 8. However, TEWL and sebum secretion did not show significant differences. CONCLUSION: Intradermal BTX injections reduced erythema and rejuvenated the skin effectively and safely in patients with rosacea.

Management of Adrenal Insufficiency Risk After Long-term Systemic Glucocorticoid Therapy in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: Clinical Practice Recommendations.

Long-term glucocorticoid therapy has improved outcomes in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. However, the recommended glucocorticoid dosage suppresses the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, leading to adrenal insufficiency that may develop during severe illness, trauma or surgery, and after discontinuation of glucocorticoid therapy. The purpose of this review is to highlight the risk of adrenal insufficiency in this patient population, and provide practical recommendations for management of adrenal insufficiency, glucocorticoid withdrawal, and adrenal function testing. Strategies to increase awareness among patients, families, and health care providers are also discussed.

Injuries in Adults 65 Years of Age and Older Prescribed Muscle Relaxants.

OBJECTIVE: The Beers criteria list skeletal muscle relaxants (SMR) as inappropriate for individuals 65 years of age and older because of anticholinergic effects, sedation, and risk of falls/fractures. Patients 65 years of age and older presenting to U.S. primary care clinics for injury, prescribed an SMR, are at risk for these events. SMR prescribing patterns in older adults with injury have not been well studied at the population level. Using nationally representative data, the prevalence of older adults prescribed an SMR presenting to U.S. primary care clinics with injury was examined. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study analyzing 2012 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) data using bivariate and multivariate techniques. NAMCS, a nationally representative database of the U.S. population, collects data from primary care office visits and uses a multi-stage sampling strategy. SETTING: Primary care offices throughout the United States. PATIENTS, PARTICIPANTS: Adults 65 years of age and older, presenting to rural primary care clinics with injury. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Prescription for SMR. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis yielded that the study population presenting to rural clinics for injury had 28% greater odds, non-Caucasian adults had 11% greater odds, and those who had been seen at least twice in the past 12 months had 34% greater odds of being prescribed an SMR. Logistic regression analysis also yielded that females 65 to 74 years of age had greater odds of having a prescription for an SMR. CONCLUSION: The results of this study identified disparities among adults 65 years of age and older presenting to U.S. rural primary care clinics with injury and prescribed an SMR. Adults 65 years of age and older, Collaborative.

Muscle structure and stiffness assessment after botulinum toxin type A injection. A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Botulinum toxin type A manages spasticity disorders in neurological central diseases. Some studies have reported that it might induce muscle changes. METHODS: We present a literature review abiding by the PRISMA statement guidelines. The purpose was to explore the structural and passive biomechanical muscle properties after botulinum toxin type A injections in healthy and spastic limb muscles, on animals and humans, as well as methods for evaluating these properties. We searched the PubMed and Cochrane Library databases using the following keywords: "Botulinum toxin" AND ("muscle structure" OR "muscle atrophy") and, "Botulinum toxin" AND "muscle elasticity". RESULTS: From the 228 initially identified articles, 21 articles were included. Histological analyses were performed, especially on animals. A neurogenic atrophy systematically occurred. In humans, one year after a single injection, the histological recovery remained incomplete. Furthermore, 2D ultrasound analyses showed a reduction of the gastrocnemius thickness and pennation angle. MRI volumetric analysis evidenced muscular atrophy six months or one year after a single injection. Passive muscle stiffness depends on these structural changes. On the short term, the biomechanical analysis showed an elastic modulus increase in animals whereas no change was recorded in humans. On the short term, ultrasound elastography imaging showed a decreased elastic modulus. DISCUSSION: To date, few data are available, but all show a structural and mechanical muscle impact post injections, specifically muscle atrophy which can linger over time. Further studies are necessary to validate this element, and the possibility of change must be taken into account particularly with repeated injections. Thus, in clinical practice, 2D ultrasound and ultrasound elastography are two non-invasive techniques that will help physicians to develop an efficient long term monitoring.

Pharmacokinetics and safety of 3,4-diaminopyridine base in healthy Japanese volunteers.

OBJECTIVE: 3,4-diaminopyridine (3,4-DAP) is commonly used for treating neuromuscular diseases, such as the Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome, but the pharmacokinetics of 3,4-DAP base have not been investigated. We therefore studied 3,4-DAP base pharmacokinetics in healthy Japanese volunteers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this crossover study, we administered a single oral dose of 10 or 20 mg 3,4-DAP base to healthy Japanese volunteers (n = 5) after food intake, or 10 mg 3,4-DAP to fasting individuals. We measured serum 3,4-DAP concentrations, performed electrocardiography (ECG), and administered questionnaires. RESULTS: After administration of 10 or 20 mg 3,4-DAP following food intake, the maximum serum concentrations (Cmax) were 8.09 ± 4.47 ng/mL and 35.8 ± 15.7 ng/mL, respectively (mean ± standard deviation; SD), and the areas under the serum concentration-time curve (extrapolated to infinity) were 639 ± 213 ng x min/mL and 2,097 ± 936 ng x min/mL (mean ± SD), respectively. Administration to fasted individuals indicated that food intake did not significantly alter 3,4-DAP pharmacokinetics. ECG showed no clinically significant changes, but PR intervals were prolonged in all cases. Two out of 5 subjects showed perioral paresthesia symptoms after administration of 20 mg 3,4-DAP. CONCLUSION: This study indicated that 3,4-DAP base pharmacokinetics were non-linear. Although no clinically significant changes in ECG were observed, it is advisable to perform ECG periodically during 3,4-DAP administration in order to monitor cardiac function. Moreover, the development of perioral paresthesia may be dependent on the dose of 3,4-DAP used.

Pharmacokinetics of sugammadex 16 mg/kg in healthy Chinese volunteers.

OBJECTIVE: Elimination of sugammadex occurs predominantly via the kidneys, with the majority of the drug excreted unchanged in the urine. To date, most studies with sugammadex have been performed in non-Asian populations. The objectives of this open-label study were to determine the pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of single-dose sugammadex (16 mg/kg) in healthy Chinese adult volunteers. METHODS: 12 Chinese subjects (6 male; 6 female) received intravenous sugammadex (16 mg/kg) as a 10-second bolus infusion. Blood samples were collected pre-sugammadex and at regular intervals up to 24 hours post-sugammadex for PK assessment. Safety was assessed via AEs, vital signs, electrocardiogram, and laboratory parameters. RESULTS: Following sugammadex 16 mg/kg infusion, peak sugammadex concentration was 197 µg/mL, clearance was 99.7 mL/min, and apparent volume of distribution at equilibrium was 10.5 L. Plasma sugammadex concentrations showed a polyexponential decline over time, with an overall geometric mean (CV%) terminal half-life of 145 minutes (17.9%) (139 minutes (17.7%) for males; 152 minutes (18.6%) for females). No influence of gender on the PK of sugammadex was observed. Three subjects experienced an adverse events (AE) (dysgeusia of mild intensity), which was considered possibly or probably related to sugammadex. There were no clinically significant changes in vital signs, electrocardiography or laboratory parameters. CONCLUSION: PK of sugammadex (16 mg/kg) was characterized in healthy Chinese subjects. Overall between-subject variability on clearance and apparent volume of distribution was ~ 10%. Sugammadex was generally well tolerated.

Switch from abobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport®) to incobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin®) botulinum toxin formulation: a review of 257 cases.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the dose equivalence ratio and treatment costs for abobotulinumtoxinA and incobotulinumtoxinA for patients with focal dystonias. DESIGN: Patient chart review. SUBJECTS/PATIENTS: Adult patients with blepharospasm (n = 19), cervical dystonia (n = 122), hemifacial spasm (n = 91) or segmental/generalized dystonia (n = 19) at a neurology outpatient clinic. METHODS: Patients were switched from established abobotulinumtoxinA therapy to incobotulinumtoxinA at a ~4:1 unit ratio. Dose requirements, injection intervals, treatment efficacy, and adverse events were evaluated for a period of ≥ 1 year. RESULTS: Patients were switched from abobotulinumtoxinA to incobotulinumtoxinA with a mean dose ratio of 4.07 (standard deviation (SD) 0.50). After switching, incobotulinumtoxinA dose requirements remained stable; the mean (SD) dose ratio at the end of the review period (52-219 weeks after switching) was 3.89 (SD 0.58). Injection intervals also remained stable after switching. Adverse events were injection site pain (n = 45) and bruising (n = 4). Five patients (2.0%) discontinued incobotulinumtoxinA treatment: 4 stopped receiving injections, and 1 reverted to abobotulinumtoxinA. Switching to incobotulinumtoxinA reduced the mean toxin expenditure to 76.7% of the cost of abobotulinumtoxinA. CONCLUSION: For patients with conditions commonly treated in dystonia clinics, switching from abobotulinumtoxinA to incobotulinumtoxinA, given at equivalent doses (~4:1 unit ratio) at similar intervals, was effective, well tolerated and achieved cost savings.

Analysis of botulinum toxin products and litigation in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) has diverse cosmetic and therapeutic applications, spanning multiple medical specialties. Recent lawsuits alleging complications from its clinical use have raised significant questions about medicolegal risk. OBJECTIVE: To identify and assess legal cases related to clinical complications of BoNT products. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Using the LexisNexis Academic online database, a search of U.S. federal and state cases between 1985 and 2012 was performed. A second search of U.S. newspapers and wires was also completed. In all but one case, the plaintiffs' legal complaints were obtained for review. RESULTS: Twenty-four relevant legal cases were found, mostly in state courts. All cases alleged adverse effects from onabotulinumtoxinA, and each named its manufacturer, Allergan, Inc., as a defendant. Most lawsuits against Allergan, Inc. were dismissed or settled. In three cases, physicians were codefendants, including one dermatologist. In two cases, jury verdicts resulted in multimillion-dollar judgments in favor of the plaintiffs. None of the lawsuits named a dermatologist when the complication arose from on-label indications and cosmetic use. CONCLUSION: Lawsuits related to complications from BoNT products are uncommon, are more likely to result from therapeutic than cosmetic applications, and typically involve product liability claims against the manufacturer.

Assessment of blinding to treatment allocation in studies of a cannabis-based medicine (Sativex®) in people with multiple sclerosis: a new approach.

BACKGROUND: Maintenance of the blind-to-treatment allocation is one of the most important means of avoiding bias in randomised controlled clinical trials. Commonly used methodologies to determine whether patients have become unblinded to treatment allocation are imperfect. This may be of particular concern in studies where outcomes are patient-reported, and with products which have a characteristic adverse event profile. We report the results of an evidence-based statistical approach to exploring the possible impact of unblinding to a cannabis-based medicine (Sativex®) in people with muscle spasticity due to multiple sclerosis. METHODS: All 666 patients included in three Phase III placebo-controlled studies were included in this analysis. The relationship between factors that might permit patients to identify their treatment allocation and the effect of treatment on the self-reported primary outcome measure was investigated using a general linear model where the dependent variable was the change from baseline in patient self-reported spasticity severity, and the various possible explanatory factors were regarded as fixed factors in the model. RESULTS: There was no significant relationship between the effect of Sativex® on spasticity and the prior use of cannabis or the incidence of 'typical' adverse events. Nor was there any significant relationship between the prior use of cannabis and the incidence of 'typical' adverse events, nor between prior use of cannabis and dose of Sativex®. CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence to suggest that there was widespread unblinding to treatment allocation in these three studies. If any patients did become unblinded, then there is no evidence that this led to bias in the assessment of the treatment difference between Sativex® and Placebo for efficacy, adverse events or study drug dosing. This methodology may be suitable for assessment of the integrity of the blind in other randomized clinical trials.

Pharmacotherapy for overactive bladder: minimally invasive treatment -- botulinum toxins.

INTRODUCTION: Considered by many a 'revolution' in the treatment of intractable overactive bladder (OAB) and with an increasing number of centers including it in their practice worldwide, botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT/A) injected into the bladder wall is a treatment of significant potential. In anticipation of the results of multicenter, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging studies, this is a critical review of the available literature on the use of botulinum toxins in the treatment of either neurogenic or idiopathic OAB. AREAS COVERED: The review is based on the English-language literature published by Medline on the use of botulinum toxins in neurogenic or idiopathic detrusor overactivity/OAB since the seminal publication in 2000. The reader is exposed to the cumulative data as well as to a more critical insight on the clinical efficacy of single and repeat injections of the most widely used formulations, the injection techniques, including different doses, dilutions and injection sites, the mechanism of action, the side effects and the cost-effectiveness of the treatment. EXPERT OPINION: Despite the markedly heterogeneous methodologies, published studies suggest that BoNT/A is effective when a number of outcomes are considered, and is considered safe. As results of large registration studies are awaited, additional research on the optimization of clinical practice parameters such as benefit-risk ratio, injection technique, predictors of response and long-term safety, as well as on the mechanism of action and the cost-effectiveness of the treatment, would be welcome.

Expanding the use of neurotoxins in facial aesthetics: a consensus panel's assessment and recommendations.

Injection of botulinum toxin type A (BoNTA) is the most common nonsurgical aesthetic procedure undertaken in the United States (U.S.). A new formulation of BoNTA (abobotulinumtoxinA, Dysport™) has recently been approved in the U.S. for the treatment of glabellar lines. This product has been used for facial aesthetics in other parts of the world for more than 15 years, whereas in the U.S. a different formulation (onabotulinumtoxinA, Botox® Cosmetic) has been used for many years. The various formulations of neurotoxins are unique and are not interchangeable nor are doses convertible from one product to another, so it is important that recommendations be developed to assist U.S. clinicians in understanding the differences between the two available formulations of BoNTA, which should ensure successful outcomes with these products. A group of worldwide experts on the aesthetic use of BoNTA convened in February 2009 in New York, NY, to review the use of BoNTA and to develop consensus recommendations for the use of the new formulation, since such guidelines previously had only been published in German. This publication summarizes key discussions from the meeting as well as recommendations and suggestions regarding the use of abobotulinumtoxinA in the areas of the face most commonly treated with BoNTA.