RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children (WIC) issues infant formula to infants who are not fully breastfed, and prior research found elevated obesity risk among children receiving lactose-reduced infant formula with corn syrup solids (CSSF) issued by WIC. This study was conducted to evaluate associations between a broader set of specialty infant formulas issued by WIC and child obesity risk, whether neighborhood context (e.g. neighborhood food environment) modifies associations, and whether racial/ethnic disparities in obesity are partly explained by infant formula exposure and neighborhood context. METHODS: WIC administrative data, collected from 2013-2020 on issued amount (categorical: fully formula fed, mostly formula fed, mostly breastfed, fully breastfed) and type of infant formula (standard cow's milk formula, and three specialty formulas: any CSSF, any soy-based formula, and any cow's milk-based formula with added rice starch) and obesity at ages 2-4 years (defined as a Body Mass Index z-score ≥ 95th percentile according to World Health Organization growth standard) were used to construct a cohort (n = 59,132). Associations of infant formula exposures and race/ethnicity with obesity risk were assessed in Poisson regression models, and modification of infant feeding associations with obesity by neighborhood context was assessed with interaction terms. RESULTS: Any infant formula exposure was associated with significantly higher obesity risk relative to fully breastfeeding. Receipt of a CSSF was associated with 5% higher obesity risk relative to the standard and other specialty infant formulas (risk ratio 1.05, 95% confidence interval 1.02, 1.08) independent of breastfeeding duration and receipt of other specialty infant formulas. The association between CSSF and obesity risk was stronger in neighborhoods with healthier food environments (10% higher risk) compared to less healthy food environments (null). Racial/ethnic disparities in obesity risk were robust to adjustment for infant formula exposure and neighborhood environment. CONCLUSIONS: Among specialty infant formulas issued by WIC, only CSSFs were associated with elevated obesity risk, and this association was stronger in healthier food environments. Future research is needed to isolate the mechanism underlying this association.
Assuntos
Fórmulas Infantis , Obesidade Infantil , Características de Residência , Humanos , Obesidade Infantil/epidemiologia , Feminino , Características de Residência/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Fórmulas Infantis/estatística & dados numéricos , Lactente , Pré-Escolar , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Aleitamento Materno/estatística & dados numéricos , Assistência Alimentar/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
The United States (US) Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) provides free infant formula to low-income families with infants. State WIC agencies periodically solicit bids from manufacturers for the exclusive contract to provide infant formula in exchange for considerable rebates. Using Nielsen 2006-2015 retail scanner data, we estimated a difference-in-difference model to examine how winning a WIC infant formula contract affects sales of the new (winning) and former brands, including effects on sales of products not eligible for WIC (spillover). One year following a contract change, volume sales of WIC infant formula increased 322% (p < 0.01) for the new brand and decreased 77% (p < 0.01) for the former brand. Spillover effects included a 43% increase in sales of toddler milks for the new brand 2 years after the contract change. State WIC contracts allow manufacturers to market formula directly to consumers and may reduce breastfeeding policy effectiveness.
Assuntos
Contratos/estatística & dados numéricos , Assistência Alimentar/estatística & dados numéricos , Fórmulas Infantis/economia , Fórmulas Infantis/estatística & dados numéricos , Aleitamento Materno/estatística & dados numéricos , Pré-Escolar , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Modelos Econômicos , Políticas , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Mexican-origin women breastfeed at similar rates as white women in the United States, yet they usually breastfeed for less time. In our study, we seek to identify differences in Mexican-origin women's breastfeeding intentions, initiation, continuation, and supplementation across nativity and country-of-education groups. METHODS: The data are from a prospective cohort study of postpartum women ages 18 to 44 recruited from 8 Texas hospitals. We included 1235 Mexican-origin women who were born and educated in either Texas or Mexico. Women were interviewed at delivery and at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post partum. Breastfeeding intentions and initiation were reported at baseline, continuation was collected at each interview, and weeks until supplementation was assessed for both solids and formula. Women were classified into 3 categories: born and educated in Mexico, born and educated in the United States, and born in Mexico and educated in the United States. RESULTS: Breastfeeding initiation and continuation varied by nativity and country of birth, although all women reported similar breastfeeding intentions. Women born and educated in Mexico initiated and continued breastfeeding in higher proportions than women born and educated in the United States. Mexican-born and US-educated women formed an intermediate group. Early supplementation with formula and solid foods was similar across groups, and early supplementation with formula negatively impacted duration across all groups. CONCLUSIONS: Nativity and country of education are important predictors of breastfeeding and should be assessed in pediatric and postpartum settings to tailor breastfeeding support. Support is especially warranted among US-born women, and additional educational interventions should be developed to forestall early supplementation with formula across all acculturation groups.
Assuntos
Aleitamento Materno/etnologia , Aculturação , Adulto , Aleitamento Materno/psicologia , Aleitamento Materno/estatística & dados numéricos , Suplementos Nutricionais/estatística & dados numéricos , Escolaridade , Feminino , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Hispânico ou Latino/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Fórmulas Infantis/estatística & dados numéricos , Recém-Nascido , Intenção , México/etnologia , Mães/educação , Estudos Prospectivos , Texas , Fatores de Tempo , Estados UnidosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Extensive marketing of 'toddler milks' (sugar-sweetened milk-based drinks for toddlers) promotes unsubstantiated product benefits and raises concerns about consumption by young children. The present study documents trends in US toddler milk sales and assesses relationships with brand and category marketing. DESIGN: We report annual US toddler milk and infant formula sales and marketing from 2006 to 2015. Sales response models estimate associations between marketing (television advertising spending, product price, number of retail displays) and volume sales of toddler milks by brand and category. SETTING: US Nielsen retail scanner sales and advertising spending data from 2006 to 2015. PARTICIPANTS: Researchers analysed all Universal Product Codes (n 117·4 million) sold by seven infant formula and eight toddler milk brands from 2006 to 2015. RESULTS: Advertising spending on toddler milks increased fourfold during this 10-year period and volume sales increased 2·6 times. In contrast, advertising spending and volume sales of infant formulas declined. Toddler milk volume sales were positively associated with television advertising and retail displays, and negatively associated with price, at both the brand and category levels. CONCLUSIONS: Aggressive marketing of toddler milks has likely contributed to rapid sales increases in the USA. However, these sugar-sweetened drinks are not recommended for toddler consumption. Health-care providers, professional organizations and public health campaigns should provide clear guidance and educate parents to reduce toddler milk consumption and address misperceptions about their benefits. These findings also support the need to regulate marketing of toddler milks in countries that prohibit infant formula marketing to consumers.
Assuntos
Publicidade/tendências , Comércio/tendências , Fórmulas Infantis/estatística & dados numéricos , Leite/estatística & dados numéricos , Bebidas Adoçadas com Açúcar/estatística & dados numéricos , Animais , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Fórmulas Infantis/economia , Masculino , Leite/economia , Bebidas Adoçadas com Açúcar/economia , Estados UnidosRESUMO
Infant formulas are the only suitable substitute for human milk. The most common infant formulas are standard formulas based on cow's milk. In addition, there are formulas for infants showing signs and symptoms of intolerance and for clinical conditions such as allergy, prematurity, and gastrointestinal diseases. A comprehensive review of the literature was made to review the composition of standard and specialized infant formulas and analyze indications for use, real or presumed nutrition differences and properties, and impact on infant growth. A brief consideration on costs is outlined for each formula. Over the past few years, industrial production and advertising of infant formulas have increased. Human milk still remains the most complete source of nutrition for infants and should be continued according to the current recommendations. Few differences exist between infant formulas, both for the nutrition action and the macronutrient/micronutrient composition. Specialized infant formulas have limited indications for use and high costs. The role of the pediatrician is crucial in the management of infant nutrition, promotion of breastfeeding, and prescribing of specialized formulas only in specific clinical conditions.
Assuntos
Fórmulas Infantis/química , Fórmulas Infantis/estatística & dados numéricos , Animais , Aleitamento Materno , Europa (Continente) , Alimentos Formulados , Humanos , Lactente , Fórmulas Infantis/economia , Fenômenos Fisiológicos da Nutrição do Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Marketing , Leite/química , Leite/estatística & dados numéricos , Leite Humano , Nutrientes/análise , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/métodosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The aims of the PROBIT trial (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03131284) were to prevent overweight or obesity occurring at two years of life, and improve feeding patterns during infancy. METHODS: The trial compared 252 northern Italian newborns whose paediatricians offered their parents an educational programme from the child's birth to the age of two years (intervention arm) with 216 newborns whose parents did not undergo the programme (control arm). This sample size was 80% powerful to detect, with a 0.05 α error, a 40% lower prevalence of overweight/obesity and a 57% lower prevalence of obesity in the intervention arm. At each well visit, the parents of the children in the intervention arm were given oral and written information about protective behaviours, with particular emphasis on responsive feeding. Overweight and obesity at two years of age were, respectively, defined as a body mass index of more than the 85th and the 95th percentile in accordance with the WHO growth charts. The sample size had 80% power to detect a 40% lower prevalence of overweight/obesity and a 57% lower prevalence of obesity in the intervention arm. RESULTS: At the age of two years, the prevalence of obesity in the intervention arm was 35% lower than among the controls, but the difference was not statistically significant (8.7% vs. 13.4%; p = 0.10) There was no difference in the prevalence of overweight/obesity between the groups (26.8% vs. 28.3%; p = 0.49). At the age of three months, a higher proportion of the infants in the intervention group were fed on demand (93% vs. 80%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The PROBIT trial failed to detect a significantly lower prevalence of obesity in the intervention arm, but did improve early feeding patterns. More powerful trials and meta-analyses are required to establish whether educating newborns' parents can decrease the prevalence of early obesity.
Assuntos
Aleitamento Materno/estatística & dados numéricos , Comportamento Alimentar/fisiologia , Fórmulas Infantis/estatística & dados numéricos , Pais/educação , Obesidade Infantil/prevenção & controle , Índice de Massa Corporal , Feminino , Seguimentos , Promoção da Saúde , Humanos , Lactente , Fenômenos Fisiológicos da Nutrição do Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Itália/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pais/psicologia , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Obesidade Infantil/epidemiologia , DesmameRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the ratio between energy expenditure and caloric density in human donor milk versus formula milk in preterm newborn infants. METHODS: This was a crossover, randomized clinical trial with 29 preterm newborn infants receiving full diet. The infants were randomly assigned to receive either human milk or formula milk alternating, after a 24-h period. Energy expenditure was evaluated by indirect calorimetry. Total calorie and macronutrient values in the human milk were calculated individually with infrared technique; energy expenditure/caloric density ratio was calculated. RESULTS: Human donor milk energy expenditure/caloric density ratio was significantly greater than in formula milk at all time points. The total mean was 1.04 ± 0.27 for the human milk and 0.81 ± 0.11 for the formula. However, when we analyzed a subgroup of newborns that received human donor milk with >60 kcal/100 mL, there was no statistical difference (Pâ¯=â¯0.36). The mean calorie values were 58.9 kcal/100 mL (human donor milk) and 81.4 kcal/100 mL (formula milk). CONCLUSION: Formula milk produced a better metabolic response than human donor milk. Human donor milk with higher caloric content showed no difference from formula, so the use of human donor milk with more caloric density should be reinforced.
Assuntos
Metabolismo Energético/fisiologia , Fórmulas Infantis/estatística & dados numéricos , Fenômenos Fisiológicos da Nutrição do Lactente/fisiologia , Recém-Nascido Prematuro , Leite Humano/fisiologia , Calorimetria Indireta , Estudos Cross-Over , Ingestão de Energia/fisiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , MasculinoRESUMO
Importance: Breastfeeding through 6 and 12 months are 2 goals of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Healthy People 2020 initiative, but the 6-month goal is met for only 52% of US infants and the 12-month goal for 30% of US infants. Objective: To determine whether structured, short-term formula supplementation for at-risk neonates affects the proportion still breastfeeding at 6 and 12 months. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial conducted at 2 US academic medical centers enrolled 164 exclusively breastfeeding mother-infant dyads of mothers who were not yet producing copious milk and infants who were 24 to 72 hours old with newborn weight loss at or above the 75th percentile for age. Participants were enrolled from January 2015 through September 2016. Interventions: Early Limited Formula (ELF), a structured formula supplementation protocol (10 mL formula fed after each breastfeeding until mothers produced copious milk), compared with control dyads, who continued exclusive breastfeeding and received a safety teaching intervention. Main Outcomes and Measures: The study's primary outcome was any breastfeeding at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included age at breastfeeding cessation and any breastfeeding at 12 months. All outcomes were assessed by maternal phone survey. Results: Eighty-two newborns were randomized to ELF and 82 to the control group. Mean (SD) maternal age was 31.4 (5.9) years, and 114 (69.5%) self-identified as non-Hispanic white; 20 (12.2%), Hispanic; 17 (10.4%), Asian; 5 (3.0%), non-Hispanic black; and 7 (4.3%), other. Compared with controls, mothers randomized to ELF were less likely to be married (n = 53 [64.6%] vs n = 66 [80.5%]; P = .03) and had shorter mean (SD) intended duration of breastfeeding (8.6 [3.4] vs 9.9 [4.4] months; P = .049). Median (interquartile range) duration of breastfeeding in the cohort was 9 (6-12) months. At 6 months, 47 (65%) infants randomized to ELF were breastfeeding, compared with 60 (77%) of the control infants (absolute difference, -12%; 95% CI, -26% to 3%; P = .12). At 12 months, 21 of the 71 ELF infants available for analysis (29.6%) were breastfeeding, compared with 37 of the available 77 (48.1%) control infants (risk difference, -18%; 95% CI, -34% to -3%). Marital status and intended breastfeeding duration were both associated with breastfeeding duration; models adjusting for these found a hazard ratio for time-to-event of breastfeeding cessation through 12 months of 0.74 (95% CI, 0.48-1.14) for ELF infants compared with infants in the control group. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort with high breastfeeding prevalence, ELF was not associated with any improvement in breastfeeding duration. Future research should examine the effect of ELF in populations at higher risk of early cessation. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02313181.
Assuntos
Aleitamento Materno/estatística & dados numéricos , Fórmulas Infantis/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Peso ao Nascer , Feminino , Idade Gestacional , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Fatores de Tempo , Estados Unidos , Redução de PesoRESUMO
This article seeks to identify the factors associated with a longer duration of breastfeeding. A nested case-control study was carried out with a cohort of mothers for about two years after they gave birth to their children in the two largest public maternity hospitals in João Pessoa - PB. Mothers who breastfed up to 15 months were considered as cases (n = 55) and those who breastfed for more than 15 months (n = 48) were considered controls. The exposure variables were maternal socioeconomic characteristics, gestational characteristics, birth characteristics and early introduction of food. The Chi-Square test was applied to select the independent variables (p-value <= 0.20) to be entered into a multiple logistic regression model, with only those with a p-value <= 0.05 being kept in the final model. The early introduction of infant formula (OR = 4.71, CI95%: 1.76 - 12.63), other milks (OR = 3.25, CI95%: 1.27 - 8.31) and having less than six prenatal consultations (OR = 2.73, CI95%: 1.04 - 7.07) were risk factors for a shorter breastfeeding duration. The early introduction of infant formulas or other milks may be an important indicator for the adoption of appropriate breastfeeding promotion and support actions to achieve the WHO target of breastfeeding for two years or longer.
O objetivo deste artigo é identificar fatores relacionados com uma maior duração do aleitamento materno. Realizou-se um estudo caso-controle aninhado em uma coorte de mães que tiveram seus filhos nas duas maiores maternidades públicas de João Pessoa PB quando eles tinham em torno de dois anos de idade. Os casos foram aquelas que amamentaram até o 15 mês (n = 55) e os controles as que amamentaram por mais de 15 meses (n = 48). As variáveis de exposição foram características socioeconômicas maternas, da gestação e parto e a introdução precoce de alimentação complementar. Aplicou-se o teste Qui-Quadrado para selecionar as variáveis independentes (p-valor <= 0,20) para ingressar em um modelo de regressão logística múltipla, permanecendo no modelo final somente aquelas com p-valor <= 0,05. A introdução precoce de fórmula infantil (OR = 4,71, IC95%: 1,76 12,63), de outros leites (OR = 3,25, IC95%: 1,27 8,31) e realizar menos de seis consultas pré-natal (OR = 2,73, IC95%: 1,04 7,07) foram fatores de risco para a menor duração do aleitamento materno. A introdução precoce de fórmulas infantis ou outros leites pode ser um indicador importante para a adoção de ações de promoção e apoio oportunas para o prolongamento da amamentação para atingir a meta da OMS de aleitamento materno por dois anos ou mais.
Assuntos
Aleitamento Materno/estatística & dados numéricos , Fórmulas Infantis/estatística & dados numéricos , Cuidado Pré-Natal/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Fatores de Tempo , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Resumo O objetivo deste artigo é identificar fatores relacionados com uma maior duração do aleitamento materno. Realizou-se um estudo caso-controle aninhado em uma coorte de mães que tiveram seus filhos nas duas maiores maternidades públicas de João Pessoa - PB quando eles tinham em torno de dois anos de idade. Os casos foram aquelas que amamentaram até o 15 mês (n = 55) e os controles as que amamentaram por mais de 15 meses (n = 48). As variáveis de exposição foram características socioeconômicas maternas, da gestação e parto e a introdução precoce de alimentação complementar. Aplicou-se o teste Qui-Quadrado para selecionar as variáveis independentes (p-valor <= 0,20) para ingressar em um modelo de regressão logística múltipla, permanecendo no modelo final somente aquelas com p-valor <= 0,05. A introdução precoce de fórmula infantil (OR = 4,71, IC95%: 1,76 - 12,63), de outros leites (OR = 3,25, IC95%: 1,27 - 8,31) e realizar menos de seis consultas pré-natal (OR = 2,73, IC95%: 1,04 - 7,07) foram fatores de risco para a menor duração do aleitamento materno. A introdução precoce de fórmulas infantis ou outros leites pode ser um indicador importante para a adoção de ações de promoção e apoio oportunas para o prolongamento da amamentação para atingir a meta da OMS de aleitamento materno por dois anos ou mais.
Abstract This article seeks to identify the factors associated with a longer duration of breastfeeding. A nested case-control study was carried out with a cohort of mothers for about two years after they gave birth to their children in the two largest public maternity hospitals in João Pessoa - PB. Mothers who breastfed up to 15 months were considered as cases (n = 55) and those who breastfed for more than 15 months (n = 48) were considered controls. The exposure variables were maternal socioeconomic characteristics, gestational characteristics, birth characteristics and early introduction of food. The Chi-Square test was applied to select the independent variables (p-value <= 0.20) to be entered into a multiple logistic regression model, with only those with a p-value <= 0.05 being kept in the final model. The early introduction of infant formula (OR = 4.71, CI95%: 1.76 - 12.63), other milks (OR = 3.25, CI95%: 1.27 - 8.31) and having less than six prenatal consultations (OR = 2.73, CI95%: 1.04 - 7.07) were risk factors for a shorter breastfeeding duration. The early introduction of infant formulas or other milks may be an important indicator for the adoption of appropriate breastfeeding promotion and support actions to achieve the WHO target of breastfeeding for two years or longer.
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Recém-Nascido , Lactente , Adulto , Adulto Jovem , Cuidado Pré-Natal/estatística & dados numéricos , Fórmulas Infantis/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Fatores de Tempo , Aleitamento Materno/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
AIM: To study the rate of iron-fortified infant formula (IFF) use in young children in France and its association with socioeconomic factors. METHODS: The ELFE national birth cohort included, in 2011, 18 329 living births in 349 hospitals randomly selected. The present analyses were restricted to children with follow-up at age two years. Milk consumption was evaluated by parental telephone interview, and its association with socioeconomic factors was studied. RESULTS: The 12 341 analysed children had a mean age of 26 months; 50% were girls. Rate of IFF use before two years old and at two years old was 65% and 43%, respectively. At age two years, use of IFF was lower with young age of the mother (adjusted OR [aOR] = 0.4, 95% CI: 0.3-0.5), low educational level (aOR = 0.7, 95% CI: 0.6-0.9), high parity (aOR = 0.3, 95% CI 0.2-0.4), and mother smoking (aOR = 0.8, 95% CI: 0.7-0.9) as well as low household income (aOR = 0.5, 95% CI: 0.4-0.7), and parents' unemployment (aOR = 0.7, 95% CI: 0.5-0.9). CONCLUSION: In this national population-based study, the rate of implementation of the ID prevention strategy was much lower at two years old than before two years old, and significantly lower in disadvantaged populations.
Assuntos
Alimentos Fortificados/estatística & dados numéricos , Fórmulas Infantis/estatística & dados numéricos , Ferro/administração & dosagem , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Oligoelementos/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Pré-Escolar , Estudos de Coortes , Emigrantes e Imigrantes , Feminino , França , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Promoting exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) is a highly feasible and cost-effective means of improving child health. Regulating the marketing of breastmilk substitutes is critical to protecting EBF. In 1981, the World Health Assembly adopted the World Health Organization International Code of Marketing of Breastmilk Substitutes (the Code), prohibiting the unethical advertising and promotion of breastmilk substitutes. This comparative study aimed to (a) explore the relationships among Code enforcement and legislation, infant formula sales, and EBF in India, Vietnam, and China; (b) identify best practices for Code operationalization; and (c) identify pathways by which Code implementation may influence EBF. We conducted secondary descriptive analysis of available national-level data and seven high level key informant interviews. Findings indicate that the implementation of the Code is a necessary but insufficient step alone to improve breastfeeding outcomes. Other enabling factors, such as adequate maternity leave, training on breastfeeding for health professionals, health systems strengthening through the Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative, and breastfeeding counselling for mothers, are needed. Several infant formula industry strategies with strong conflict of interest were identified as harmful to EBF. Transitioning breastfeeding programmes from donor-led to government-owned is essential for long-term sustainability of Code implementation and enforcement. We conclude that the relationships among the Code, infant formula sales, and EBF in India, Vietnam, and China are dependent on countries' engagement with implementation strategies and the presence of other enabling factors.
Assuntos
Aleitamento Materno , Aconselhamento , Promoção da Saúde , Cuidado do Lactente , Fórmulas Infantis , Aleitamento Materno/estatística & dados numéricos , China , Comunicação , Feminino , Humanos , Índia , Lactente , Fórmulas Infantis/economia , Fórmulas Infantis/legislação & jurisprudência , Fórmulas Infantis/estatística & dados numéricos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Licença Parental , Vietnã , Organização Mundial da SaúdeRESUMO
BACKGROUND:: Breastfeeding is known to be the most beneficial way of feeding infants, but 68% of the infants enrolled in the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children are fully formula fed. Mandated annual reports about breastfeeding aggregate data from the states into regions, which obscures important information. RESEARCH AIM:: The aim of this study is to reexamine the data supplied by the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children to identify which areas of the United States have the lowest incidence of breastfeeding infants. METHODS:: A retrospective cross-sectional observational study was conducted. Data from the Breastfeeding Data Local Agency Report were extracted, graphed, and analyzed. RESULTS:: Data provided from the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children for fiscal year 2016 show that the range of fully formula fed infants at the regional level is 60% to 78%, while at the state level the range is wider, at 51% to 89%. The states with the largest numbers of fully formula fed infants were Mississippi (89%), Louisiana (88%), Alabama (88%), and Arkansas (87%). When examining data from all 90 reporting agencies, the range of fully formula fed infants was 38% to 95%. CONCLUSIONS:: Aggregating state, Native American nation, and territorial data at the regional level resulted in a loss of important information. WIC's current breastfeeding interventions may be more effective in some areas than others. Future research can examine successful and unsuccessful interventions on a state or local level.
Assuntos
Aleitamento Materno/estatística & dados numéricos , Assistência Alimentar/estatística & dados numéricos , Fórmulas Infantis/estatística & dados numéricos , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Estudos Transversais , Demografia , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Breastfeeding provides health benefits for women and newborns. However, few studies have explored how these health benefits translate into economic savings. RESEARCH AIM: This study aimed to estimate the healthcare costs savings generated by exclusive breastfeeding for healthy newborns. METHODS: We designed a longitudinal two-group observational study that included healthy women and newborns ( N = 236) in Toledo, Spain. Over the first 6-months of the infants' lives, we reviewed their clinical histories to determine their consumption of healthcare resources and the type of nutrition provided. The sample was categorized into two groups: exclusive breastfeeding ( n = 46) and non-exclusive breastfeeding for 6 months ( n = 190). Two-part regression models were applied to determine whether there were differences in healthcare costs between the groups. RESULTS: The average age of the women was 32 ( SD: 5.3). The average birth weight of the newborns was 3.3 kg. ( SD: 0.38). At 6 months, 19.5% ( n = 46) of the women breastfed exclusively, 28.4% ( n = 67) combined breastfeeding with formula, and 45.8% ( n = 108) used formula only. Healthcare costs during follow-up reached 785.58 (44% for specialized care, 42% for primary care, 9.8% for medical emergencies, 3% for medications and approximately 1% for medical tests). The statistical analysis estimated a lower healthcare cost of between 454.40 and 503.50 for exclusively breastfed newborns. CONCLUSION: Breastfeeding generated savings in healthcare costs; therefore, it could be a cost-efficient option compared with alternatives. Researchers who evaluate the efficiency of strategies that promote breastfeeding can contribute to the sustainability of health services.
Assuntos
Aleitamento Materno/estatística & dados numéricos , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Fórmulas Infantis/economia , Fórmulas Infantis/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Aleitamento Materno/economia , Feminino , Promoção da Saúde/organização & administração , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Estudos Longitudinais , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Espanha , Adulto JovemRESUMO
CONTEXTO: A APLV é o tipo de alergia alimentar mais comum nas crianças até vinte e quatro meses e é caracterizada pela reação do sistema imunológico às proteínas do leite. Dados internacionais mostram prevalência de crianças com APLV que variam de 0,3% a 7,5% até os dois anos de idade. Não há pesquisas ou inquéritos nacionais sobre a prevalência da APLV no Brasil. No entanto, em agosto de 2012, o MS realizou um levantamento nos municípios brasileiros, nos quais foi identificada média de acompanhamento de 0,4% (0,2% a 0,7%) de crianças com APLV em serviços/programas de atenção nutricional estruturados nesses municípios pelo SUS. A conduta na APLV baseia-se na exclusão da proteína alergênica da dieta; prescrição de dieta substitutiva que proporcione todos os nutrientes necessários em crianças até 6 meses; prescrição de alimentação complementar (de 6 a 24 meses). As fórmulas infantis para necessidades dietoterápicas específicas são indicadas para crianças de até vinte e quatro meses de idade. TECNOLOGIA: As fórmulas nutricionais utilizadas na APLV são as fórmulas à base de soja (FS), à base de proteína extensamente hidrolisada (FEH) com ou sem lactose e à base de aminoácidos (FAA). As FEH são indicadas como primeira opção para todas as crianças até vinte e quatro meses com APLV não mediada por IgE e são toleradas em 90% dos casos de crianças menores de seis meses e em 95% das crianças acima de seis meses. Para crianças de seis a vinte e quatro meses com formas de APLV mediadas por IgE, a primeira opção deve ser a prescrição de FS. Somente 10% das crianças menores de seis meses e 5% das crianças acima de seis meses não toleram FEH, sendo necessário o uso de FAA. AVALIAÇÃO DE IMPACTO ORÇAMENTÁRIO: Com os preços de compra das fórmulas nutricionais praticados pelas Secretarias Estaduais de Saúde que responderam ao levantamento feito pelo CONASS, o impacto orçamentário seria de R$ 79.631.103,17 no primeiro ano de incorporação e de R$ 659.212.776,41 em cinco anos de incorporação. RECOMENDAÇÃO PRELIMINAR DA CONITEC: os membros da CONITEC recomendaram que o tema fosse submetido à consulta pública com recomendação preliminar favorável à incorporação no SUS das fórmulas nutricionais para tratamento de crianças de 0 a 24 meses de idade com alergia à proteína do leite de vaca. CONSULTA PÚBLICA: Foram recebidas 69 contribuições técnico-científicas e 252 contribuições de experiência ou opinião. A maioria das contribuições se referiu a aspectos relacionados ao Protocolo Clínico e Diretrizes Terapêuticas de APLV e estas não foram consideradas na avaliação da incorporação das fórmulas nutricionais. As contribuições que questionaram aspectos da incorporação das fórmulas relataram a inadequação da utilização da fórmula à base de proteína de soja, mas não apresentaram embasamento científico robusto, ou sugeriram a inclusão da fórmula à base de arroz, para a qual ainda existem questionamentos sobre eficácia e segurança. DELIBERAÇÃO FINAL: Os membros da CONITEC deliberaram por recomendar a incorporação das fórmulas nutricionais à base de soja, à base de proteína extensamente hidrolisada com ou sem lactose e à base de aminoácidos para crianças de 0 a 24 meses com alergia à proteína do leite de vaca (APLV). DECISÃO: Incorporar as fórmulas nutricionais à base de soja, à base de proteína extensamente hidrolisada com ou sem lactose e à base de aminoácidos para crianças de 0 a 24 meses com alergia à proteína do leite de vaca (APLV), no âmbito do Sistema Único de Saúde - SUS. Dada pela Portaria nº 67, publicada no DOU nº 226, seção 1, página 57, em 26 de novembro de 2018.
Assuntos
Humanos , Hidrolisados de Proteína/administração & dosagem , Hipersensibilidade a Leite , Proteínas de Soja/administração & dosagem , Fórmulas Infantis/estatística & dados numéricos , Aminoácidos/administração & dosagem , Avaliação da Tecnologia Biomédica , Avaliação em Saúde/economia , Sistema Único de Saúde , Brasil , Análise Custo-Benefício/economiaRESUMO
Eliminating formula giveaways ("banning the bag") has been embraced as a way to reduce the influence of formula marketing in hospitals and to increase breastfeeding rates among new mothers, but the policy raises ethical concerns in the mind of some, notably because it denies a useful benefit to mothers who have trouble affording formula. Hospital policies to promote breastfeeding, including banning the bag, should be sensitive to the economic and other costs associated with breastfeeding and should be consciously designed to make breastfeeding easier and not just to make formula feeding more difficult. We recommend that hospitals evaluate the negative impacts of banning the bag on their patient population in order to ensure that families are not being negatively affected.
Assuntos
Aleitamento Materno/ética , Fórmulas Infantis/estatística & dados numéricos , Marketing/métodos , Feminino , Promoção da Saúde/ética , Humanos , Lactente , Alimentos Infantis/estatística & dados numéricos , Recém-Nascido , Rotulagem de Produtos/ética , Fatores SocioeconômicosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To examine the relationship of parental sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) attitudes with SSB consumption during the first 1000 days of life-gestation to age 2 years. METHODS: We studied 394 Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC)-enrolled families during the first 1000 days of life in northern Manhattan, New York, in 2017. In regression models, we assessed cross-sectional relationships of parental SSB attitude scores with habitual daily parent SSB calories and infant SSB consumption, adjusting for demographic and socioeconomic characteristics. RESULTS: Each point higher parental SSB attitude score was associated with lower parental SSB consumption (-14.5 median kcals; 95% confidence interval [CI] = -22.6, -6.4). For infants, higher parental SSB attitude score was linked with lower odds of infant SSB consumption (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.84; 95% CI = 0.71, 0.99), and adjustment for socioeconomic factors slightly attenuated results (AOR = 0.85; 95% CI = 0.71, 1.02). CONCLUSIONS: During the first 1000 days of life, greater negativity in parental attitudes toward SSB consumption was associated with fewer parental calories consumed from SSBs and lower likelihood of infant SSB consumption. Public Health Implications. Parental attitudes toward SSBs should be targeted in future childhood obesity interventions during pregnancy and infancy.
Assuntos
Bebidas/estatística & dados numéricos , Assistência Alimentar/estatística & dados numéricos , Pais/psicologia , Açúcares/administração & dosagem , Animais , Aleitamento Materno/estatística & dados numéricos , Bebidas Gaseificadas , Estudos Transversais , Ingestão de Energia , Feminino , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Lactente , Fórmulas Infantis/estatística & dados numéricos , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Leite/estatística & dados numéricos , Cidade de Nova Iorque , Gravidez , Saúde Pública , Grupos Raciais , Análise de Regressão , Fatores SocioeconômicosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: It is accepted that newborns lose weight in the first few days of life. Baby-Friendly practices that support breastfeeding may affect newborn weight loss. The objective of this study were: 1) To determine whether Baby-Friendly practices are associated with term newborn weight loss day 0-2 in three feeding categories (exclusively breastfed, mixed formula fed and breastfed, and formula fed). 2) To determine whether Baby-Friendly practices increase exclusive breast feeding rates in different ethnic populations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective case-control study. Term newborn birth weight, neonatal weights days 0-2, feeding type, type of birth, and demographic information were collected for 1,000 births for the year before Baby-Friendly designation (2010) and 1,000 in 2013 (after designation). Ultimately 683 in the first group and 518 in the second met the inclusion criteria. RESULTS: Mean weight loss decreased day 0-2 for infants in all feeding types after the initiation of Baby-Friendly practices. There was a statistically significant effect of Baby-Friendly designation on weight loss for day 0-2 in exclusively breastfed infants (p < 0.01) after controlling for birth weight. Exclusive breast feeding increased in all ethnic groups after Baby-Friendly practices were put in place. CONCLUSION: There was a decrease in mean weight loss day 0-2 regardless of feeding type after Baby-Friendly designation. Exclusive breast feeding increased in the presence of Baby-Friendly practices.
Assuntos
Alimentação com Mamadeira/estatística & dados numéricos , Aleitamento Materno/estatística & dados numéricos , Promoção da Saúde/métodos , Fórmulas Infantis/estatística & dados numéricos , Fenômenos Fisiológicos da Nutrição do Lactente , Redução de Peso , Adulto , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Etnicidade , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Política Organizacional , Estudos Retrospectivos , Literatura de Revisão como Assunto , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: We examined the variation between 126 New York hospitals in formula supplementation among breastfed infants after adjusting for socioeconomic, maternal, and infant factors and stratifying by level of perinatal care. METHODS: We used 2014 birth certificate data for 160 911 breastfed infants to calculate hospital-specific formula supplementation percentages by using multivariable hierarchical logistic regression models. RESULTS: Formula supplementation percentages varied widely among hospitals, from 2.3% to 98.3%, and was lower among level 1 hospitals (18.2%) than higher-level hospitals (50.6%-57.0%). Significant disparities in supplementation were noted for race and ethnicity (adjusted odds ratios [aORs] were 1.54-2.05 for African Americans, 1.85-2.74 for Asian Americans, and 1.25-2.16 for Hispanics, compared with whites), maternal education (aORs were 2.01-2.95 for ≤12th grade, 1.74-1.85 for high school or general education development, and 1.18-1.28 for some college or a college degree, compared with a Master's degree), and insurance coverage (aOR was 1.27-1.60 for Medicaid insurance versus other). Formula supplementation was higher among mothers who smoked, had a cesarean delivery, or diabetes. At all 4 levels of perinatal care, there were exemplar hospitals that met the HealthyPeople 2020 supplementation goal of ≤14.2%. After adjusting for individual risk factors, the hospital-specific, risk-adjusted supplemental formula percentages still revealed a wide variation. CONCLUSIONS: A better understanding of the exemplar hospitals could inform future efforts to improve maternity care practices and breastfeeding support to reduce unnecessary formula supplementation, reduce disparities, increase exclusive breastfeeding and breastfeeding duration, and improve maternal and child health outcomes.