Comparison of Quality of Life and Caregiving Burden of 2- to 4-Year-Old Children Post Liver Transplant and Their Parents.

A literature search determined there are no studies on children between 2 and 4 years of age who have had a liver transplant and their parents. For this reason, this study aimed to compare the quality of life of children between 2 and 4 years of age who have had a liver transplant, and the caregiving burden of their parents. The study was carried out as a descriptive cross-sectional study on 47 children who visited Inonu University Liver Transplant Institute outpatient clinic between March 2017 and March 2018. This study found that 59.6% of the children with transplants were male and 38.3% had their organ donated by their mother. There was a positive relationship between the quality of life of the parents and the quality of life and subdimensions of the children. There was a negative relationship between parental quality of life and care burden. This study found that the quality of life of children with liver transplants and their parents was low and, as the quality of life of children was impaired, the caregiving burden of parents increased. Healthcare professionals' awareness of the effect of caregivers' care load on quality of life after liver transplantation can positively affect the healing process.

Assessment of health-related quality of life in patients receiving stem cell therapy for end-stage liver disease: an Egyptian study.

INTRODUCTION: This prospective cohort study aimed to assess the influence of stem cell therapy (SCT) on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) by using the SF-36 v2 and to elucidate the influence of objective clinical variables on subjective HRQOL. METHODS: The study included 100 chronic liver disease patients (50 received SCT, and 50 received supportive medical treatment (SMT)). Both groups completed a modified SF-36 v2 form before therapy and at 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-month intervals. Fifty healthy Egyptian volunteers were enrolled in the study and completed the SF-36 v2 form once. RESULTS: Both SCT and SMT groups showed significantly lower pretherapy SF 36 v2 scores compared with healthy volunteers. In SCT-treated patients, limited complications were encountered (SF-36 v2 scores showed significant improvement in all domains throughout the follow-up period) compared with the deterioration shown by SMT patients after therapy. A significant association was detected between SF-36 v2 scores and laboratory data in SCT patients during the first month after therapy. The grade of ascites improved during the follow-up in SCT compared with SMT patients. The mean survival time was 277.56 days (95% CI, 246.217 to 308.903) for SMT and 359.300 days (95% CI, 353.022 to 365.578) for SCT patients (log rank, 0.00). Stem cell-treated patients showed no malignancies. CONCLUSIONS: SCT positively affects health-related quality of life in cirrhosis patients. The survival rate was significantly improved after SCT.

Assessment of living donors with respect to pre- and posttransplant psychosocial properties and posttransplant family functioning in pediatric liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: We aimed in this study to investigate pre- and posttransplant clinical and psychosocial features of the donors and the effects of living-related liver transplantation and possible relevant factors on psychosocial outcome and family functioning. METHODS: Thirty-two living donors (19 females, age 31.84 ± 7.10 years) were evaluated. Medical records of donors regarding pre- and posttransplant clinical and psychological features and family life were evaluated. RESULTS: The donors were parents (n=28, 87.6%) in most. In the pretransplant evaluation, 5 donors (19.3%) had anxiety regarding postoperative complications and quality of life. Donors were discharged from the hospital in a median of 7 days (range, 5-30 days). Return to work and feeling of complete well-being were accomplished in a median of 4 weeks (range, 1-32 weeks) and 10 weeks (range, 4-48 weeks), respectively. Sixteen recipients (50.0%) suffered from major complications, and 3 (9.4%) required invasive intervention. Fourteen donors (43.4%) reported pain around the surgical incision and nonspecific gastrointestinal problems postoperatively. Psychological problems were observed in 8 donors (25.0%); 2 (6.3%) had depression requiring drug and psychotherapeutic intervention. Psychological disruption was found to be correlated with the presence of problems in the recipient (p<0.01, r=0.487). The donors' relationship with the recipient was negatively affected in 1 (3.1%), but improved in 15 (46.9%) cases. Nine donors (34.6%) displayed nervous behavior toward their spouses, and 2 (7.7%) later divorced. Life of the other family members was negatively affected in 8 (30.7%). Two donors' spouses (7.7%) failed to carry out domestic responsibilities. CONCLUSIONS: Psychological disturbance and abnormal family functioning are frequently observed during the posttransplant period. Therefore, psychologic assessment and evaluation of family functioning should be regularly repeated during the posttransplant period.

Health status versus utilities of patients with end-stage liver disease.

BACKGROUND: Health-related quality of life (HRQL) in patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD) can be evaluated using either health-status questionnaires or utility assessment techniques. The two approaches have never been compared in terms of the values they assign to health prior to liver transplantation. STUDY DESIGN: We assessed health status of patients with ESLD using validated disease-specific instruments covering multiple domains (measures of disease, psychological status, personal function, social/role function, and general health perception). We also elicited utilities using formal approaches (standard gamble [SG] and time tradeoff [TTO]) and a simpler alternative (visual analog scale [VAS]). PATIENTS: Outpatients and inpatients at a single center prior to liver transplantation (n = 78). PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Health status was generally poor (median physical symptoms score on a 0-1 [worst to best] scale, 0.33; psychological symptoms, 0; happiness, 0.50; personal function, 0; social/role function, 0.40; and general health perception, 0.40). The median VAS score was 0.50. The median TTO was 0.79, indicating that half of the patients in our sample chose healthier life in return for a 21% shorter life expectancy. The median SG score was 0.50, indicating that half of the patients were willing to take up to a 50% risk of death in exchange for perfect health. CONCLUSIONS: Both health status measures and utility assessments indicate that HRQL is compromised in patients awaiting liver transplantation. Despite the overall consistency between the two approaches, however, health status measures do not serve as reasonable proxies for utilities. For formal economic evaluations such as cost effectiveness analyses, only direct measures of utility can be used to quantify health states.