Perspectives on the currently available pharmacotherapy for wet macular degeneration.

INTRODUCTION: Wet age-related macular degeneration (w-AMD) is a leading cause of visual impairment globally, with its prevalence expected to rise alongside increasing life expectancy. The current standard treatment involves frequent intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF agents, which although revolutionary, pose significant burdens on both patients and healthcare services. AREAS COVERED: This review explores current and emerging pharmaceutical treatments for w-AMD, focusing on their pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, efficacy, and safety. Promising developments include extending treatment intervals with newer anti-VEGF agents like brolucizumab and faricimab, biosimilars offering cost-effective options, and exploring innovative drug delivery methods such as subretinal gene therapy. Combination therapies, gene therapies, and novel agents like KSI-301 and OPT-302 show potential for improving treatment outcomes and reducing treatment burden. EXPERT OPINION: While current treatments for w-AMD have significantly advanced with the advent of anti-VEGF therapies, their limitations in terms of treatment burden and incomplete responses have spurred research into diverse alternative approaches. These innovative strategies offer hope for improving patient outcomes and reducing healthcare burdens, suggesting a promising future for w-AMD management.

An eye on equity: faricimab-driven health equity improvements in diabetic macular oedema using a distributional cost-effectiveness analysis from a UK societal perspective.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Diabetic macular oedema (DMO) is a leading cause of blindness in developed countries, with significant disease burden associated with socio-economic deprivation. Distributional cost-effectiveness analysis (DCEA) allows evaluation of health equity impacts of interventions, estimation of how health outcomes and costs are distributed in the population, and assessments of potential trade-offs between health maximisation and equity. We conducted an aggregate DCEA to determine the equity impact of faricimab. METHODS: Data on health outcomes and costs were derived from a cost-effectiveness model of faricimab compared with ranibizumab, aflibercept and off-label bevacizumab using a societal perspective in the base case and a healthcare payer perspective in scenario analysis. Health gains and health opportunity costs were distributed across socio-economic subgroups. Health and equity impacts, measured using the Atkinson inequality index, were assessed visually on an equity-efficiency impact plane and combined into a measure of societal welfare. RESULTS: At an opportunity cost threshold of £20,000/quality-adjusted life year (QALY), faricimab displayed an increase in net health benefits against all comparators and was found to improve equity. The equity impact increased the greater the concerns for reducing health inequalities over maximising population health. Using a healthcare payer perspective, faricimab was equity improving in most scenarios. CONCLUSIONS: Long-acting therapies with fewer injections, such as faricimab, may reduce costs, improve health outcomes and increase health equity. Extended economic evaluation frameworks capturing additional value elements, such as DCEA, enable a more comprehensive valuation of interventions, which is of relevance to decision-makers, healthcare professionals and patients.

Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Drugs Compared With Panretinal Photocoagulation for the Treatment of Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor drugs (anti-VEGFs) compared with panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) for treating proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) in the United Kingdom. METHODS: A discrete event simulation model was developed, informed by individual participant data meta-analysis. The model captures treatment effects on best corrected visual acuity in both eyes, and the occurrence of diabetic macular edema and vitreous hemorrhage. The model also estimates the value of undertaking further research to resolve decision uncertainty. RESULTS: Anti-VEGFs are unlikely to generate clinically meaningful benefits over PRP. The model predicted anti-VEGFs be more costly and similarly effective as PRP, generating 0.029 fewer quality-adjusted life-years at an additional cost of £3688, with a net health benefit of -0.214 at a £20 000 willingness-to-pay threshold. Scenario analysis results suggest that only under very select conditions may anti-VEGFs offer potential for cost-effective treatment of PDR. The consequences of loss to follow-up were an important driver of model outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-VEGFs are unlikely to be a cost-effective treatment for early PDR compared with PRP. Anti-VEGFs are generally associated with higher costs and similar health outcomes across various scenarios. Although anti-VEGFs were associated with lower diabetic macular edema rates, the number of cases avoided is insufficient to offset the additional treatment costs. Key uncertainties relate to the long-term comparative effectiveness of anti-VEGFs, particularly considering the real-world rates and consequences of treatment nonadherence. Further research on long-term visual acuity and rates of vision-threatening complications may be beneficial in resolving uncertainties.

Disparities in Retinal Vein Occlusion Presentation and Initiation of Anti-VEGF Therapy: An Academy IRIS® Registry Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Investigate disparities in retinal vein occlusion (RVO) presentation and initiation of anti-VEGF treatment. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SUBJECTS: Patients in the American Academy of Ophthalmology IRIS® (Intelligent Research in Sight) Registry database (2015-2021) with branch or central RVO and macular edema (ME). METHODS: The association of demographic characteristics and presenting visual acuity (VA) with anti-VEGF treatment initiation were quantified using multivariable logistic regression. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Treatment with ≥ 1 anti-VEGF injection within 12 months after RVO diagnosis. RESULTS: A total of 304 558 eligible patients with RVO and ME were identified. Age at presentation varied by race, ethnicity, sex, and RVO type (all P values < 0.001). Within the first year after RVO presentation, 192 602 (63.2%) patients received ≥ 1 anti-VEGF injection. In a multivariable regression model adjusting for relevant covariates, female (vs. male) patients had lower odds of receiving injections (odds ratio [OR], 0.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93-0.96; P < 0.0001) as did Black/African American (vs. White) patients (OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.88-0.92; P < 0.0001) and Asian (vs. White) patients (OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.91-0.99; P = 0.02), whereas older patients (vs. patients aged < 51 years) had higher odds (61-70 years: OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.16-1.24; 71-80 years: OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.16-1.24; > 80 years: OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.11-1.18; all P values < 0.0001). Hispanic (vs. non-Hispanic) patients had a small increased odds of treatment initiation (OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.04-1.11; P < 0.0001). Results were similar in the subset of 226 143 patients with VA data. In this subset, patients with presenting VA < 20/40 to 20/200 were most frequently treated in the first year after diagnosis (∼ 70%) and patients with light perception/no light perception (LP-NLP) vision or VA of 20/20 or better were treated least frequently (36.9% and 41.9%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In this large national clinical registry, 37% of RVO patients with ME had no anti-VEGF treatment documented in the first year after diagnosis. Black/African American, Asian, and female patients and patients with VA of LP-NLP were least likely to receive treatment. Awareness of this undertreatment and these disparities highlight the need for initiatives to ensure all RVO patients receive timely anti-VEGF injections for optimized visual outcomes. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

[The population affected by neovascular age-related macular degeneration and treated with anti-Vegf through Italian administrative healthcare data.] / La popolazione con degenerazione maculare neovascolare correlata all'età trattata con anti-Vegf attraverso i dati amministrativi sanitari.

INTRODUCTION: The neo-vascular age-related macular degeneration (nAmd) is a frequent cause of vision loss, although the intravitreal (Ivt) injections of anti-Vegf (vascular endothelial growth factor) have improved functional outcomes. This study has assessed the healthcare and economic burden on the Italian national health service (Inhs) for patients with nAmd and new users of anti-Vegf. METHODS: From the database of Fondazione Ricerca e Salute (ReS), people aged ≥55 and with an in-hospital diagnosis of nAmd and/or an injection of anti-Vegf (aflibercept, ranibizumab, pegaptanib; index date) in 2018 are selected. Those with other conditions treated with anti-Vegf and with an Ivt injection before 2018 are excluded. New users of anti-Vegf are analyzed by sex, age, comorbidities, Ivt administrations, switch of anti-Vegf, local outpatient specialist services (with some focuses) and direct healthcare costs charged to the Inhs Results. In 2018, of 8125 inhabitants aged ≥55 with nAmd (4.6x1000 inhab.; mean age 76±9; F: 50%), 1513 (19%) are new users of Ivt anti-Vegf (mean age 74±9), whose incidence (0.9x1000) increased with age until 84 years old. A proportion of 60.7% had ≥2 comorbidities (mainly hypertension, dyslipidemia and diabetes). Within the 2nd follow-up year, only 598 patients are still treated (60% were lost). On average, 4.8 Ivt injections in the first and 3.1 in the second year are registered. On average, the total cost charged to the Inhs per new user of anti-Vegf was € 6726 (Ivt anti-Vegf accounted for the 76%) and € 3282 (hospitalizations for causes different from nAmd accounted for the 47%), during the first and the second year, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis suggests that in Italy people with nAmd and new users of anti-Vegf are elderly, affected by many comorbidities, treated with Ivt anti-VEGF less than what is required and authorized to achieve a benefit, undergo very few follow-up outpatient specialist visits and tests and, within the 2nd year, their hospitalizations for causes different from nAmd mainly weighs on the total expenditure charged to the Inhs.

The Impact of International Pricing Index Models on Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) Drug Costs in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of three international pricing index models on Medicare Part B spending for intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) drugs Design: Cost analysis Methods: U.S. and international sales data from the Multinational Integrated Data Analysis (MIDAS) database was used with data from the U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to calculate Medicare Part B spending on anti-VEGF drugs Main Outcome: Medicare Part B expenditures of anti-VEGF drugs under various international pricing index models Results: Total Medicare Part B savings was greatest (75%) under the "most favored nation" proposal to peg the U.S. price to the lowest international price. Under the "most favored nation" proposal, prices of aflibercept are reduced from $1825.80 to $507.17, bevacizumab from $74.39 to $27.55, and ranibizumab (3 units or 0.3mg) from $1057.08 to $99.72. CONCLUSION: International pricing index models are one of many pricing strategies that could lead to savings in Medicare Part B costs.

Intravitreal Pharmacotherapies for Diabetic Macular Edema: A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.

PURPOSE: To review the evidence on the safety and efficacy of current anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and intravitreal corticosteroid pharmacotherapies for the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME). METHODS: Literature searches were last conducted on May 13, 2020, in the PubMed database with no date restrictions and limited to articles published in English. The combined searches yielded 230 citations, of which 108 were reviewed in full text. Of these, 31 were deemed appropriate for inclusion in this assessment and were assigned a level of evidence rating by the panel methodologist. RESULTS: Only the 21 articles with level I evidence were included in this assessment. Seventeen articles provided level I evidence for 1 or more anti-VEGF pharmacotherapies, including ranibizumab (14), aflibercept (5), and bevacizumab (2) alone or in combination with other treatments for DME. Level I evidence was identified in 7 articles on intravitreal corticosteroid therapy for treatment of DME: triamcinolone (1), dexamethasone (4), and fluocinolone acetonide (2). CONCLUSIONS: Review of the available literature indicates that intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF agents and corticosteroids are efficacious treatments for DME. Elevated intraocular pressure and cataract progression are important potential complications of corticosteroid therapy. Further evidence is required to assess the comparative efficacy of these therapies. Given the limited high-quality comparative efficacy data, choice of therapy must be individualized for each patient and broad therapeutic access for patients is critical to maximize outcomes.

Opportunities and Challenges in Translational Research: The Development of Photodynamic Therapy and Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Drugs.

The development of photodynamic therapy and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents have revolutionized the treatment of retinal diseases, transforming the retina subspecialty by ushering in an age of pharmacological treatments for a wide range of diseases, including age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

Racial, Ethnic, and Insurance-Based Disparities Upon Initiation of Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy for Diabetic Macular Edema in the US.

PURPOSE: This study characterizes the association of risk factors including race, ethnicity, and insurance status with presenting visual acuity (VA) and diabetic retinopathy (DR) severity in patients initiating treatment with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy for diabetic macular edema (DME). DESIGN: Retrospective, cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: The Academy Intelligent Research in Sight (IRIS) Registry database was queried for patients who initiated anti-VEGF injection treatment for DME between 2012 and 2020 (n = 203 707). METHODS: Multivariate regression analyses were conducted to understand how race, ethnicity, insurance status, and geographic location were associated with baseline features. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Visual acuity and DR severity. RESULTS: Patients on Medicare and private insurance presented with higher baseline VA compared with patients on Medicaid (median of 2.31 and 4.17 greater Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Scale [ETDRS] letters, respectively P < 0.01). White and non-Hispanic patients presented with better VA compared with their counterparts (median of 0.68 and 2.53 greater ETDRS letters, respectively; P < 0.01). Black and Hispanic patients presented with a worse baseline DR severity compared with White and non-Hispanic patients (odds ratio, 1.23 and 1.71, respectively; P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: There are ethnic and insurance-based disparities in VA and disease severity upon initiation of anti-VEGF therapy for DME treatment. Public health initiatives could improve timely initiation of treatment.

ASSESSMENT OF EARLY CHANGES IN SPECTRAL DOMAIN-OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY AFTER INITIATION OF TREATMENT WITH INTRAVITREAL AFLIBERCEPT (EYLEA) OVER A 12-WEEK PERIOD FOR PATIENTS WITH NEOVASCULAR AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION: A Multicenter French Study (START).

PURPOSE: To assess early changes in spectral-domain optical coherence tomography during the loading phase with intravitreal aflibercept therapy in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration. METHODS: In this prospective, open-label, single-arm, multicenter study, patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration, who were antivascular endothelial growth factor treatment-naïve, received three monthly initial doses of intravitreal aflibercept 2 mg. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with dry spectral-domain optical coherence tomography at 12 weeks, defined as an absence of intraretinal edema, intraretinal cysts, subretinal fluid, and subretinal pigment epithelium fluid. RESULTS: Fifty eyes of 50 patients were investigated. At 12 weeks, 34.0% (17/50) had dry spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Marked reductions were observed for all other spectral-domain optical coherence tomography parameters. The mean macular central thickness fell significantly from 463.2 ± 184.3 µm at baseline to 288.9 ± 76.8 µm at Week 12 (P < 0.0001). The mean best-corrected visual acuity also improved significantly from 61.0 ± 16.0 letters at baseline to 66.6 ± 19.0 letters at Week 12 (P = 0.0006). CONCLUSION: The anatomic and functional outcomes improved over the 12-week study period. All outcome variables peaked after the third aflibercept injection, confirming the benefit of three initial doses.

BRAIN HEALTH ASSESSMENT IN MACULAR DEGENERATION PATIENTS UNDERGOING INTRAVITREAL ANTI-VASCULAR ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH FACTOR INJECTIONS (THE BHAM STUDY): An Interim Analysis.

PURPOSE: After intravitreal injection, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents are found in the systemic circulation and can suppress systemic VEGF levels. Neuronal health and cognitive function in the central nervous system have been associated with normal physiological levels of VEGF expression. We wished to determine whether there was an association between cumulative anti-VEGF exposure and cognitive function. METHODS: One hundred and seventy-five patients aged 65 to 85 with vision of at least 20/50 or better in one eye and a diagnosis of age-related macular degeneration took an iPad-based brain health assessment to determine their risk of mild cognitive impairment. The result for each patient was compared with the total number of anti-VEGF injections per individual patient. Patients were then stratified into groups with 0 injections (control), 1 to 9 injections, 10 to 20 injections, or greater than 20 injections. RESULTS: The group of patients with more than 20 injections had a higher likelihood of mild cognitive impairment compared with the control group, with statistically significant worse mean Z-scores (P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Our study is the first to associate worsening cognitive health with higher cumulative anti-VEGF injections. This study was not designed to show a causal link, but does suggest that additional investigation is warranted.

Automated Quantitative Assessment of Retinal Fluid Volumes as Important Biomarkers in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

PURPOSE: To evaluate retinal fluid volume data extracted from optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans by artificial intelligence algorithms in the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (NV-AMD). DESIGN: Perspective. METHODS: A review was performed of retinal image repository datasets from diverse clinical settings. SETTINGS: Clinical trial (HARBOR) and trial follow-on (Age-Related Eye Disease Study 2 10-year Follow-On); real-world (Belfast and Tel-Aviv tertiary centers). PATIENTS: 24,362 scans of 1,095 eyes (HARBOR); 4,673 of 880 (Belfast); 1,470 of 132 (Tel-Aviv); 511 of 511 (Age-Related Eye Disease Study 2 10-year Follow-On). ObservationProcedures: Vienna Fluid Monitor or Notal OCT Analyzer applied to macular cube scans. OutcomeMeasures: Intraretinal fluid (IRF), subretinal fluid (SRF), and pigment epithelial detachment (PED) volumes. RESULTS: The fluid volumes measured in neovascular AMD were expressed efficiently in nanoliters. Large ranges that differed by population were observed at the treatment-naïve stage: 0-3,435 nL (IRF), 0-5,018 nL (SRF), and 0-10,022 nL (PED). Mean volumes decreased rapidly and consistently with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy. During maintenance therapy, mean IRF volumes were highest in Tel-Aviv (100 nL), lower in Belfast and HARBOR-Pro Re Nata, and lowest in HARBOR-monthly (21 nL). Mean SRF volumes were low in all: 30 nL (HARBOR-monthly) and 48-49 nL (others). CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative measures of IRF, SRF, and PED are important biomarkers in NV-AMD. Accurate volumes can be extracted efficiently from OCT scans by artificial intelligence algorithms to guide the treatment of exudative macular diseases. Automated fluid monitoring identifies fluid characteristics in different NV-AMD populations at baseline and during follow-up. For consistency between studies, we propose the nanoliter as a convenient unit. We explore the advantages of using these quantitative metrics in clinical practice and research.

A Cost-Benefit Analysis of VEGF-Inhibitor Therapy for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration in the United States.

PURPOSE: To perform a societal cost-benefit analysis comparing intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin), ranibizumab (Lucentis), and aflibercept (Eylea) monotherapies for treating neovascular age-related macular degeneration (NVAMD). DESIGN: Cost-benefit analysis. METHODS: Center for Value-Based Medicine using published clinical trial and Medicare data. PATIENT POPULATION: 168,400 estimated 2018 U.S. patients with new-onset NVAMD. Procedure(s): cost-benefit analysis using 2018 U.S. real dollars. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: 11-year direct ophthalmic medical costs expended for bevacizumab, ranibizumab, and aflibercept monotherapies were compared with ophthalmic and nonophthalmic direct medical, direct nonmedical, and indirect medical (productivity) costs saved by the therapies. RESULTS: Bevacizumab monotherapy had an individual, 11-year $14,772 treatment cost and net $357,680 societal return (11-year 2,421% return on investment [ROI]). Ranibizumab therapy cost $106,582 and returned $265,870 to society (249% ROI), whereas aflibercept treatment cost $61,811 and returned $310,611 to society (503% ROI). The 2018 NVAMD overall treatment cohort, 11-year net societal gain was $28.5 billion to patients and insurers, with $24.2 billion (84.9%) coming from bevacizumab therapy, $0.7 billion (2.5%) from ranibizumab therapy, and $3.6 billion (12.6%) from aflibercept therapy. Substituting bevacizumab for ranibizumab and aflibercept in the 2018 new-onset NVAMD patients would save an estimated $1.343 billion over 11 years. Vascular endothelial growth factor-inhibitor (VEGF-I) therapy in 2018 should contribute $12.2 billion to the Gross Domestic Product over 11 years. Late treatment would decrease this by 78% to $2.7 billion. CONCLUSIONS: Intravitreal NVAMD bevacizumab, ranibizumab and aflibercept monotherapies accrue considerable financial, ROIs to patients and insurers as they increase national wealth.

Aqueous Cytokine Expression and Higher Order OCT Biomarkers: Assessment of the Anatomic-Biologic Bridge in the IMAGINE DME Study.

PURPOSE: To identify biomarkers for predicting response to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy in diabetic macular edema (DME) and evaluate any links between cytokine expression and optical coherence tomography (OCT) phenotype. DESIGN: The IMAGINE is a post hoc image analysis and cytokine expression assessment of the Efficacy & Safety Trial of Intravitreal Injections Combined With PRP for CSME Secondary to Diabetes Mellitus (DAVE) randomized clinical trial. METHODS: Subjects were categorized as anatomical responders or nonresponders, and within the responder group as rebounders and non-rebounders based on quantitative, longitudinal OCT criteria. Retinal layer and fluid features were extracted using an OCT machine-learning augmented segmentation platform. Responders were further sub-classified by rapidity of response. Aqueous concentrations of 54 cytokines were measured at multiple timepoints. Expression was compared between responder groups and correlated with OCT imaging biomarkers. RESULTS: Of the 24 eyes studied, 79% were anatomical responders with 38% super responders, 17% early responders, and 25% slow responders. Twenty-one percent were nonresponders. Super responders had increased baseline vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) (880.0 pg/mL vs 245.4 pg/mL; P = .012) and decreased monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1) (513.3 pg/mL vs 809.5 pg/mL; P = .0.042) concentrations compared with nonresponders. Interleukin-6 (-24.9 pg/mL vs 442.8 pg/mL; P = .032) concentrations increased among nonresponders during therapy. VEGF concentrations correlated with central subfield thickness (r = 0.49; P = .01). Panmacular retinal volume correlated with increased interleuckin-6 (r = 0.47; P = .02) and decreased MCP-1 (r = -0.45; P = .03). Matrix metallopeptidase-1 correlated with subretinal fluid volume (r = 0.50; P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: OCT imaging biomarkers correlated with both intraocular cytokines and responsiveness to anti-VEGF therapy, which indicated a possible link to underlying pathways and their relevance to DME prognosis. Baseline concentrations of VEGF and MCP-1 are associated with anatomic response to anti-VEGF therapy.

Radiomics-based assessment of ultra-widefield leakage patterns and vessel network architecture in the PERMEATE study: insights into treatment durability.

AIM: To evaluate the potential of radiomics-based ultra-widefield fluorescein angiography (UWFA)-derived imaging biomarkers in retinal vascular disease for predicting therapeutic durability of intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI). METHODS: The Peripheral and Macular Retinal Vascular Perfusion and Leakage Dynamics in Diabetic Macular Edema and Retinal Venous Occlusions During Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) Treatment for Retinal Edema (PERMEATE) study prospectively evaluated quantitative UWFA dynamics in diabetic macular oedema or macular oedema secondary to retinal vascular occlusion. 27 treatment-naïve eyes were treated with 2 mg IAI q4 weeks for the first 6 months, and then administered q8 weeks. Morphological and graph-based attributes were used to model the spatial distribution of leakage areas, while tortuosity measures were used to model the vessel network disorder. Eyes were grouped based on functional tolerance of the first 8-week treatment interval challenge. 'Non-rebounders' (N=15) maintained/improved best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) following the 8-week challenge. 'Rebounders' (N=12) exhibited worsened BVCA. The image biomarkers were used with a machine learning classifier to preliminarily evaluate their ability to predict BCVA stability. RESULTS: Two new UWFA image-derived biomarkers were identified and extracted. The cross-validated area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.77±0.14 using baseline leakage distribution features and 0.73±0.10 for the UWFA baseline tortuosity measures. Additionally, the change in vascular tortuosity between month 4 and baseline yielded an AUC of 0.73±0.08. Three baseline clinical features of letter score, macular volume and central subfield thickness yielded a corresponding AUC of 0.42±0.09. CONCLUSIONS: Two computer-extracted UWFA radiomics-based descriptors were identified as potential biomarkers for predicting treatment durability and tolerance of longer treatment intervals. Conventional treatment parameters were not significantly different between these same groups.

Value of Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Gene Therapy for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

PURPOSE: To use discounted cash flow (DCF) analysis to estimate the value creation associated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) genetic therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). DESIGN: Economic analysis. PARTICIPANTS: Adults undergoing serial intravitreal anti-VEGF injections in 1 eye for nAMD. METHODS: Discounted cash flow modeling with scenario analysis was used to derive a present value for a 1-time alternative treatment to lifelong anti-VEGF treatment for nAMD. Multiple sensitivity analyses were performed on the basis of patient age at time of first injection and frequency interval of intravitreal injection. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Present values of DCF and scenario analyses. RESULTS: Discounted cash flow analysis of intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment for nAMD resulted in a base-case valuation of $208 420.61, $219 093.31, and $17 379.41 for a 1-time alternative treatment to aflibercept, ranibizumab, and bevacizumab, respectively. This figure covaried significantly with anti-VEGF agent according to the patient age at first injection ($78 323.19-$292 449.87) and frequency of injections ($148 422.91-$388 096.81). In addition, for bevacizumab, variability was driven by the hypothetical degree of clinical superiority of 1-time therapy to repeated intravitreal injections due to reduction in adverse events ($17 379.41-$18 250.79) or reduction in direct or indirect costs associated with age-related macular degeneration ($17 379.41-$657 406.55). CONCLUSIONS: Anti-VEGF gene therapy approaches can create significantly different value propositions based on the agent modeled, patient age at first injection, frequency of injections, and clinical profile of the medication. Although the use of aflibercept or ranibizumab as a comparative cost metric is logical from a bioequivalence perspective, the disparity in medication costs should not be the primary value driver in applied models. Instead, bevacizumab should be the base case ($17 379.41), with additional value driven from an improvement in quality of life through clinical superiority. A reduction in direct and indirect costs can be used to approximate the value from maintained visual acuity, which is elaborated in the DCF analysis approach described in this article. This model can serve as a basis for assessing the price ceiling of myriad gene therapy approaches. Given the high present values for these therapeutics, innovative costing and reimbursement mechanisms should be further explored, with contingencies for sustained efficacy.

Implante biodegradável de dexametasona no tratamento do Edema Macular Diabético em pacientes não responsivos à terapia prévia com anti-VEGF / Biodegradable dexamethasone implant in the treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema in unresponsive patients previous anti-VEGF therapy

CONTEXTO: O edema macular diabético (EMD) é a principal alteração responsável por perda irreversível de acuidade visual em pacientes com diabetes mellitus (DM) que desenvolveram retinopatia diabética (RD). O EMD é caracterizado por inchaço na região central do olho resultado da ruptura da barreira sanguínea-retiniana e do acúmulo de líquido nas camadas intrarretinianas da mácula. A prevenção primária do EMD é o manejo ideal da doença, considerando a associação direta da prevalência do diabetes e da RD. As estratégias de tratamento consistem inicialmente no controle sistêmico da glicemia, da hemoglobina glicada (HbA1c), de lipídeos séricos, da função renal, estabilização da pressão sanguínea e controle do índice de massa corporal, associado à prática de exercícios físicos e alimentação adequada. O estágio da doença é determinante para a escolha do método de tratamento e o sucesso do tratamento é avaliado pela acuidade visual, pelo estadiamento da classificação da RD e pela análise dos exames complementares. Atualmente a terapia considerada padrão-ouro no tratamento do EMD consiste no uso do fator de crescimento endotelial anti-vascular (antiVEGF), mas em caso de insucesso terapêutico o emprego de corticoides em forma de implantes de liberação controlada tem sido utilizado. Pergunta: O uso do implante biodegradável de dexametasona (Ozurdex®) é eficaz, seguro e custo-efetivo para o tratamento de pacientes adultos com EMD, que falham à terapia com agente anti-VEGF? Evidências científicas: Dez publicações (uma revisão sistemática, dois ensaios clínicos e sete estudos observacionais) foram apresentados no relatório. De acordo com a metanálise, de qualidade metodológica moderada, há um ganho de 20 letras na BCVA (melhor acuidade visual corrigida) de pacientes tratados com o implante biodegradável de dexametasona, após um seguimento médio de avaliação de seis meses. A maioria dos estudos observacionais apontam melhora da BCVA em relação ao baseline do estudo. Os ensaios clínicos apresentaram um risco de viés moderado e um deles descreveu os achados anatômicos do estudo MEAD, avaliando as principais alterações morfológicas em relação ao baseline da ESCR, volume macular, área de espessamento da retina, vazamento macular, perda capilar macular e gravidade da retinopatia diabética. O implante de dexametasona atrasou o tempo de início da progressão do EMD em ± 12 meses, o que ao final do estudo, reduziu a espessura do subcampo central da retina (ESCR) em média 117,3 e 127,8 m nos grupos tratados com dexametasona versus 62,1 m nos olhos tratados com simulação (tratamentos p <0,001 vs, simulação). Entre os desfechos secundários avaliados estão: aumento da PIO, alterações da EFC, ESC e EMC, além de alterações do grau de retinopatia diabética. Os principais eventos adversos relatados em pacientes sob tratamento foram: descolamento de retina, inflamação da câmara anterior; dor ocular; queratite ou opacidade vítrea; e insurgência da catarata. AVALIAÇÃO ECONÔMICA: Foi conduzido um estudo de custo-efetividade e análises de sensibilidade univariada e probabilística. O tratamento com o implante biodegradável de dexametasona foi comparado com um procedimento simulado, ou não tratamento, num horizonte temporal de três anos. Para a indicação proposta, a incorporação da dexametasona resultaria em uma razão de custo-efetividade incremental (RCEI) estimada de R$ 54.568,99 por paciente e inclui custos de aquisição do medicamento, de administração, além de custos com visitas e de avaliação de eventos adversos. AVALIAÇÃO DE IMPACTO ORÇAMENTÁRIO: Dois cenários foram avaliados para estimar o impacto orçamentário (AIO) da incorporação da dexametasona. O cenário base foi representado por um impacto total de R$ 1,76 bilhões em uma estimativa epidemiológica e um total de R$ 159,61 milhões em uma estimativa por demanda aferida, enquanto o cenário por protocolo foi representado por uma economia acumulada total de R$ 39,11 milhões em uma estimativa epidemiológica e R$ 3,50 milhões em uma estimativa por demanda aferida, ambos os cenários em um horizonte temporal de 5 anos. MONITORAMENTO DO HORIZONTE TECNOLÓGICO: Foi detectada uma tecnologia, a fluocinolona acetonida, também um corticoide cuja via de administração é a mesma do implante biodegradável de dexametasona. Os estudos sobre a tecnologia atualmente estão em fase 4. Além disso, foi detectado no horizonte o medicamento aganirsen, um oligonucleotídeo, inibidor do gene IRS1, que está em fase 2 de pesquisa clínica para a indicação. Considerações: A evidência disponível é baseada em estudos clínicos randomizados e estudos observacionais que comparam o período pré-dexametasona e pós-dexametasona. Comparada ao procedimento simulado a dexametasona demonstrou melhora dos desfechos observados (BCVA, EFC, PIO, ESC, EMC, morfologia da retina, alterações no grau de RD e segurança), no entanto, a qualidade das evidências foi considerada baixa. Limitações importantes também foram identificadas na ACE e na AIO, indicando provável superestimação dos valores no âmbito no SUS. DECISÃO PRELIMINAR da Conitec: Diante do exposto, a Conitec, em sua 89ª reunião ordinária, realizada no dia 05 de agosto de 2020, deliberou que a matéria fosse disponibilizada em consulta pública com recomendação preliminar desfavorável à incorporação no SUS do implante biodegradável de dexametasona para tratamento de pacientes com edema macular diabético não responsivos à terapia prévia com anti-VEGF. Considerou-se que as evidências apresentadas são insuficientes para os desfechos analisados, visto baixo nível de certeza apresentado. Além disso, do ponto de vista econômico, o uso de parâmetro inadequado no modelo ocorreu por parte do demandante, pois a dexametasona tem indicação apenas para pacientes não responsivos à terapia prévia com antiangiogênicos, dessa forma não cabe a comparação dos custos com o medicamento aflibercepte, considerando que não são tecnologias substitutas. A matéria foi disponibilizada em consulta pública. CONSULTA PÚBLICA: A Consulta Pública nº 50/2020 foi realizada entre os dias 15/09/2020 a 05/10/2020. Foram recebidas 400 contribuições, sendo 152 pelo formulário para contribuições técnico-científicas e 248 pelo formulário para contribuições sobre experiência ou opinião de pacientes, familiares, amigos ou cuidadores de pacientes, profissionais de saúde ou pessoas interessadas no tema. Dentre as 152 contribuições técnico-científicas, apenas 05 foram analisadas, pois 147 se tratavam de duplicatas, contribuições em branco, desprovidas de teor científico ou que tratavam de experiência ou opinião. As 05 contribuições consideradas para análise discordaram da recomendação preliminar da Conitec, tendo como justificativas: rápida resposta terapêutica da tecnologia, melhor responsividade em comparação à terapia com antiVEGF, bons resultados clínicos em casos de oclusões vasculares, olhos fácicos e uveítes inflamatórias, opção terapêutica em caso de contraindicação aos anti-VEGF ou dificuldade de seguimento. Dentre as 248 contribuições de experiência ou opinião recebidas, apenas 123 foram analisadas, pois 125 se tratavam de duplicatas ou contribuições em branco. Dentre as 123 analisadas, 105 discordaram da recomendação preliminar da Conitec, tendo como argumentações: o implante de dexametasona se trata de única terapia corticoide pós falha terapêutica aos anti-VEGF, pois o aumento de citocinas, em alguns casos, só são controladas pelo corticoide; o implante ser menos oneroso que o custo social quando há perda irreversível de visão dos pacientes; e restrição de uso, no SUS, de um medicamento já disponível no rol de procedimentos da Agência Nacional de Saúde Suplementar (ANS). O demandante e fabricante da tecnologia enviou nova proposta de preço para incorporação com 25% de desconto, junto à nova análise de custo-efetividade e impacto orçamentário, que foram apresentados aos membros do plenário. Além desta, outras contribuições analisadas foram importantes para a complementação do relatório, especialmente por trazer as expectativas de adesão ao procedimento, por profissionais e pacientes. RECOMENDAÇÃO FINAL: Os membros do plenário presentes na 92ª reunião ordinária da Conitec, no dia 04 de novembro de 2020, deliberaram, por unanimidade, recomendar a não incorporação, no SUS, do implante biodegradável de dexametasona para tratamento de pacientes com edema macular diabético não responsivos à terapia prévia com antiVEGF. Foi considerado que ainda há alguns aspectos não esclarecidos sobre a prática clínica no cuidado do EMD, como o limiar de ineficácia ou insucesso terapêutico com anti-VEGF e que faltam evidências científicas que indiquem se a tecnologia avaliada seria substitutiva para os anti-VEGF ou se deveria ser criada uma segunda linha para o cuidado do EMD. Reiterou-se que as evidências avaliadas no relatório técnico não foram consideradas robustas o suficiente para a tomada de decisão em favor da incorporação do implante biodegradavel de dexametasona em casos de ineficácia terapêutica com anti-VEGF, que foi a proposta apresentada pelo demandante. Ademais, não foram adicionadas na CP referências que alterassem a análise das evidências apresentadas no relatório preliminar. Foi assinado o Registro de Deliberação nº 570/2020. DECISÃO: Não incorporar o implante biodegradável de dexametasona no tratamento do edema macular diabético em pacientes não responsivos à terapia prévia com anti-VEGF, no âmbito do Sistema Único de Saúde - SUS, conforme Portaria nº 58, publicada no Diário Oficial da União nº 228, seção 1, página 716, em 1º de dezembro de 2020.

Lifetime Outcomes of Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Treatment for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

Importance: Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), the largest single cause of irreversible severe vision loss in high-income countries, can now be treated with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors, but to our knowledge, no data on lifetime outcomes are available. Objective: To determine visual acuity (VA) outcomes of anti-VEGF treatment for nAMD in both eyes for patients' remaining lifetime. Design, Setting, and Participants: Multistate modeling using real-world cohort data of 3192 patients with nAMD (>67 000 visits) treated in routine eye clinics in Australia, New Zealand, and Switzerland. Data were analyzed between 2007 and 2015. Exposures: Intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment at the treating physician's discretion and prospective data collection in standardized registry. Main Outcomes and Measures: Visual acuity in both eyes over the remaining lifetime. Results: For the mean remaining lifetime of 11 years, an estimated 12% (n = 371; 95% CI, 345-400) of the sample retained driving VA and an estimated 15% (n = 463; 95% CI, 434-495) reading VA in at least 1 eye. At that time, an estimated 82% of the sample (n = 2629; 95% CI, 2590-2660) had dropped out. Younger age at baseline and more injections during the first year of treatment were associated with better long-term outcomes. Conclusions and Relevance: Anti-VEGF treatment was associated with preserved useful visual acuity in almost 20% of patients over their average remaining lifetime. More than 80% of patients will cease treatment over that time, having likely experienced a deterioration of vision beforehand. This is a remarkable outcome compared with outcomes without intervention, which lead to legal blindness within 3 years of disease onset in 80% of those affected. These findings underline the public health necessity of providing anti-VEGF treatment to persons in need.

Twenty-Four-Month OCTA Assessment in Diabetic Patients Undergoing Fixed-Interval Intravitreal Aflibercept Therapy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Evaluate capillary perfusion density (CPD) in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) undergoing fixed intravit-real aflibercept injections (IAI) through 24 months. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prospective, interventional, single-arm study enrolling 20 patients with persistent DME. Patients received IAI every 4 weeks until DME resolution followed by extension to every 8 weeks. Optical coherence tomography angiography was obtained at baseline, 6, 12, and 24 months. RESULTS: Sixteen of 20 eyes completed the study. Baseline mean central subfield thickness was 420 µm, which improved to 251 µm (P < .001). The mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improved by 5.5 letters (P = .042). The whole superficial CPD decreased by 5.3% (P = .001) and the deep CPD decreased by 4.4% (P = .009). Better BCVA correlated with less CPD loss within the superficial parafovea (r = +0.66 [0.23, 0.88]; P = .006) and whole (r = +0.60 [0.12, 0.85]; P = .017) areas. CONCLUSION: Superficial and deep CPD decreased despite fixed IAI through 24 months. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2020;51:448-455.].