Feasibility and cost analysis of day 4 granulocyte colony-stimulating factor mobilized peripheral blood progenitor cell collection from HLA-matched sibling donors.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend treatment with 4-5 days of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) for optimal donor peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) mobilization followed by day 5 collection. Given that some autologous transplant recipients achieve adequate collection by day 4 and the possibility that some allogeneic donors may maximally mobilize PBPC before day 5, a feasibility study was performed evaluating day 4 allogeneic PBPC collection. METHODS: HLA-matched sibling donors underwent collection on day 4 of G-CSF for peripheral blood (PB) CD34+ counts ≥0.04 × 106/mL, otherwise they underwent collection on day 5. Those with inadequate collected CD34+ cells/kg recipient weight underwent repeat collection over 2 days. Transplant and PBPC characteristics and cost analysis were compared with a historical cohort collected on day 5 per our prior institutional algorithm. RESULTS: Of the 101 patient/donor pairs, 50 (49.5%) had adequate PBPC collection on day 4, with a median PB CD34+ cell count of 0.06 × 106/mL. Day 4 donors were more likely to develop bone pain and require analgesics. Median collected CD34+ count was significantly greater, whereas total nucleated, mononuclear and CD3+ cell counts were significantly lower, at time of transplant infusion for day 4 versus other collection cohorts. There were no significant differences in engraftment or graft-versus-host disease. Cost analysis revealed 6.7% direct cost savings for day 4 versus historical day 5 collection. DISCUSSION: Day 4 PB CD34+ threshold of ≥0.04 × 106/mL identified donors with high likelihood of adequate PBPC collection. Day 4 may be the optimal day of collection for healthy donors, without adverse effect on recipient transplant outcomes and with expected cost savings.

G-CSF and IL-8 for early diagnosis of sepsis in neonates and critically ill children - safety and cost effectiveness of a new laboratory prediction model: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial [ISRCTN91123847].

INTRODUCTION: Bacterial infection represents a serious risk in neonates and critically ill paediatric patients. Current clinical practice is characterized by frequent antibiotic treatment despite low incidence of true infection. However, some patients escape early diagnosis and progress to septic shock. Many new markers, including cytokines, have been suggested to improve decision making, but the clinical efficacy of these techniques remains uncertain. Therefore, we will test the clinical efficacy of a previously validated diagnostic strategy to reduce antibiotic usage and nosocomial infection related morbidity. METHODS: All patients admitted to the multidisciplinary neonatal and paediatric intensive care unit of a university children's hospital will be included. Patients will be allocated either to routine sepsis work up or to the intervention strategy with additional cytokine measurements. Physicians will be requested to estimate the pre-test probability of sepsis and pneumonia at initial suspicion. In the treatment arm, physicians will receive raw cytokine results, the likelihood ratio and the updated post-test probability. A high post-test probability will suggest that immediate initiation of antibiotic treatment is appropriate, whereas a low post-test probability will be supportive of watchful waiting or discontinuing prophylactic empirical therapy. Physicians may overrule the suggestions resulting from the post-test probability. CONCLUSION: This trial will ascertain the clinical efficacy of introducing new diagnostic strategies consisting of pre-test probability estimate, novel laboratory markers, and computer-generated post-test probability in infectious disease work up in critically ill newborns and children.

[Assessment of hematopoiesis regeneration in patients with solid tumors after radiotherapy]. / Ocena regeneracji ukladu krwiotwórczego u chorych na nowotwory lite leczonych promieniowaniem jonizujacym.

The myelotoxicity is one of the most severe adverse events of radiotherapy. Increase of CD34+ cells level in peripheral blood as result of raised output of granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) can be result of hematopoiesis regeneration after radiotherapy. The aim of this study was to determine the hematopoiesis regeneration using analysis of CD34+ cells level in peripheral blood and serum concentration of G-CSF in patients treated with radiotherapy according to irradiated body region and irradiation field size. Two groups of irradiated patients were examined. Group I consisted of 11 patients (mean age 56) with gynecological malignancies (teletherapy dose 40-50 Gy for pelvic area and brachytherapy with Cs). Group II consisted of 10 patients (mean age 58) with head and neck malignancies (teletherapy only 50-70 Gy). Every patient was evaluated 3 times: before radiotherapy, in the day of ending and 14 days after therapy. 3 ml of blood for CD34 and serum for G-CSF estimation were collected. Blood cells were stained with monoclonal antibody specific for CD34 antigen and analysed by flow cytometry. G-CSF level was estimated by ELISA. After radiotherapy in both groups statistically significant leukopenia (p < 0.001) was observed. There was no difference between two groups in levels of CD34+ cells before and in the last day of therapy but there was significant increase of CD34+ cells in group I compared with group II 14 days after treatment (p < 0.01). Decrease of CD34+ cells during radiotherapy and after its ending in all patients was observed but only in group II was statistically significant. Positive correlation between amount of leukocytes and CD34+ cells percentage was stated. There were no statistically significant differences in serum G-CSF concentration within particular groups and between group I and II. Our results indicate that evaluation of CD34+ cells level in peripheral blood is useful in prediction of hematopoiesis regeneration after radiotherapy. G-CSF serum concentration is not prognostic factor in these groups of patients.

G-CSF serum pharmacokinetics during peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization: neutrophil count-adjusted dosage might potentially improve mobilization and be more cost-effective.

The optimal dosing schedule of G-CSF for peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) mobilization is still under investigation although many centers use 10 microg/kg/day in a single subcutaneous dose. However, G-CSF clearance increases with increasing absolute neutrophil count (ANC). Hence a G-CSF dosage adjusted to ANC might be a reasonable approach. We measured G-CSF trough serum levels by sandwich ELISA assay at different ANCs in eight patients undergoing treatment with filgrastim at 10 microg/kg/day in a single subcutaneous dose. A total of 26 samples were analyzed, and a strong correlation between increasing ANC and decreasing G-CSF levels was found by linear regression analysis (P < 0.0003, r2 = 0.4199). For ANC values above 5000/microl the trough serum levels, ie 24 h after administration, were consistently below the level that provides maximal clonogenic precursor stimulation in vitro (10 ng/ml). Serial serum G-CSF measurements performed in three patients at 0, 3, 6, 9 and 24 h after G-CSF administration, showed a reduction of the area under the curve (AUC) with increasing ANC. For an ANC of 20000/microl or greater, the G-CSF serum level fell under the maximal in vitro stimulation threshold of 10 ng/ml within 12 h. This preliminary pharmacokinetic data seems to suggest that an ANC-adjusted G-CSF dosing schedule might improve the design of PBPC mobilization regimens.

Human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor after induction chemotherapy in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

BACKGROUND: Recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor PO1 CA-20180ilgrastim) hastens the recovery from neutropenia after P30 CA-21765emotherapy, but its role in the management of childhood leukemia is unclear. METHODS: We randomly assigned 164 patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (age range, 2 months to 17 years) to receive placebo or G-CSF (10 microg per kilogram of body weight per day subcutaneously), beginning one day after the completion of remission-induction therapy and continuing until the neutrophil count was greater than or equal to 1000 per cubic millimeter for two days. The clinical and laboratory effects of this therapy were documented for 21 days. The area under the plasma G-CSF concentration-time curve was measured on days 1 and 7 in both groups. RESULTS: Responses to the growth factor could be assessed in 148 patients (73 in the G-CSF group and 75 in the placebo group). G-CSF treatment did not significantly lower the rate of hospitalization for febrile neutropenia (58 percent in the G-CSF group vs. 68 percent in the placebo group; relative risk, 0.85; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.59 to 1.16), increase the likelihood of event-free survival at three years (83 percent in both groups), or decrease the number of severe infections (five in the G-CSF group vs. six in the placebo group). Patients treated with G-CSF had shorter median hospital stays (6 days vs. 10 days, P=0.011) and fewer documented infections (12 vs. 27, P=0.009). The median total costs of supportive care were similar in the G-CSF and placebo groups ($8,768 and $8,616, respectively). Among patients who did not have febrile neutropenia during the first week of G-CSF or placebo injections, higher systemic exposure to the growth factor on day 7 was significantly related to a lower probability of subsequent hospitalization (P=0.049). CONCLUSIONS: G-CSF treatment had some clinical benefit in children who received induction chemotherapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia, but it did not reduce the rate of hospitalization for febrile neutropenia, prolong survival, or reduce the cost of supportive care.