Bleeding in patients with hemophilia who have inhibitors: Modeling US medical system utilization and cost avoidance between recombinant factor VIIa products with different clinical dosing requirements.

BACKGROUND: A mainstay of treatment in patients with hemophilia with inhibitors (PWIs) is the use of a recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) bypassing agent. A new rFVIIa product may allow reduced rFVIIa utilization for on-demand treatment of bleeding episodes (BEs). OBJECTIVE: A decision analytic health economic model was developed to compare the utilization and consequent need for bleed-related clinical encounters of 2 rFVIIa products, with the International Nomenclature Name of eptacog alfa (EA) and eptacog beta (EB). METHODS: This study uses recent, peer-reviewed, and published data from clinical trials with similar endpoints for 1 million insured male lives in the United States. rFVIIa product utilization was modeled in hemophilia (A and B) PWI for on-demand treatment of BEs with rFVIIa treatment. Estimated annual BE rates were modeled to include prophylaxis and on-demand management. The clinical encounter avoidance estimates are based on refractory bleeding through 24 hours. RESULTS: In a cohort of 1 million insured, 5-6 patients with hemophilia A or B with inhibitors annually receive on-demand treatment for a total of 59 mild/moderate BEs. The model suggests that EB requires less unit utilization per BE (13,125 µg and 17,850 µg for the 75µg/kg and 225µg/kg dose regimens, respectively) than EA 90 µg/kg dosing (20,178µg), with wholesale acquisition costs expanding the difference. Further, both EB initial dose regimens would permit decreased total nonmedication health plan spending for the acute treatment of BEs by reducing the need for clinical encounters arising from BEs that fail to respond within 24 hours. CONCLUSIONS: With reduced infusion requirements, the model consistently shows that EB could generate lower insured-cohort drug utilization, as well as reduce costly clinical encounters by keeping mild and moderate BEs amenable to home bypassing agent management. DISCLOSURES: The article was funded by HEMA Biologic, LLC. The authors approved all content and results in this article without being subject to sponsor censorship. Mr Jensen, Mr Cyr, and Ms Hathway are employees of PRECISIONheor, which provides consulting services to the pharmaceutical industry, including HEMA Biologics, LLC. Dr Batt is an advisor to PRECISIONheor. Dr Alexander is a former employee of HEMA Biologics, LLC, and provides consulting services to the pharmaceutical industry.

Antithrombotic and hemostatic stewardship: evaluation of clinical outcomes and adverse events of recombinant factor VIIa (Novoseven®) utilization at a large academic medical center.

BACKGROUND: Recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) (Novoseven®) is utilized for the reversal of anticoagulation-associated bleeding and refractory bleeding in cardiac surgery. In August 2015, rFVIIa was transferred from the blood bank to the pharmacy at New York University (NYU) Langone Health. Concordantly, an off-label dosing guideline was developed. The objective of this study was to describe utilization and cost of rFVIIa and assess compliance to our dosing guideline. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, observational review of rFVIIa administrations post-implementation of an off-label dosing guideline. All patients who received rFVIIa between September 2015 and June 2017 were evaluated. For each rFVIIa administration, anticoagulation and laboratory values, indications for use, dosing, ordering and administration times, concomitant blood products, and adverse events were collected. Adverse events included venous thromboembolism, stroke, myocardial infarction, and death due to systemic embolism and mortality. The primary endpoint was the utilization of rFVIIa in accordance with the off-label dosing guideline. Secondary endpoints included hemostatic efficacy of rFVIIa, adverse events, blood products administered, and cost-effectiveness of rFVIIa transition to pharmacy. RESULTS: A total of 63 patients [pediatric (n = 6), adult (n = 57)] received rFVIIa, with the majority of use for refractory bleeding after cardiac surgery. The utilization of rVIIa decreased after development of the off-label dosing guideline and transition from blood bank to pharmacy. The total incidence of thromboembolic events within 30 days was 19.6%; 17.6% arterial and 2% venous; 70% of patients with an adverse event were over 70 years of age. Use of rFVIIa reduced the median number of units of blood products administered. CONCLUSION: Administration of rFVIIa for cardiac surgery appears to be effective for hemostasis. Transitioning rFVIIa from the blood bank to pharmacy and implementation of a dosing guideline appears to have reduced utilization. Patients receiving rFVIIa should be monitored for thromboembolic events. Elderly patients may be at higher risk for thromboembolic events.

Hemophilia and inhibitors: current treatment options and potential new therapeutic approaches.

The immune response to infused factor concentrates remains a major source of morbidity and mortality in the treatment of patients with hemophilia A and B. This review focuses on current treatment options and novel therapies currently in clinical trials. After a brief review of immune tolerance regimens, the focus of the discussion is on preventing bleeding in patients with hemophilia and inhibitors. Recombinant factor VIIa and activated prothrombin complex concentrates are the mainstays in treating bleeds in patients with inhibitors. Both agents have been shown to reduce bleeding episodes to a similar degree when infused prophylactically; however, individual patients may respond better to one agent over the other at any given time. The international immune tolerance trial revealed that a high-dose factor VIII regimen provided significantly better bleeding protection than the low-dose regimen. Given the high cost of treatment and the potential for a high-dose immune tolerance regimen to prevent bleeding in some patients, we discuss how we treat patients to maximize the prevention of bleeds while minimizing cost. Novel approaches to treatment of these patients are in development. These include agents that mimic factor VIII or augment thrombin generation by bypassing the inhibitor, as well as agents that inhibit the natural anticoagulants.

Ethics & evidence in medical debates: the case of recombinant activated factor VII.

We cannot just point to the facts to solve a medical debate. The use of evidence is itself a matter of values. What the evidence tells us to do tends to depend on what we see as important.

Assessment of individual dose utilization vs. physician prescribing recommendations for recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) in paediatric and adult patients with congenital haemophilia and alloantibody inhibitors (CHwI): the Dosing Observational Study in Hemophilia (DOSE).

Recent data from the Dosing Observational Study in Hemophilia diary study has described home treatment with recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) in congenital haemophilia with inhibitors (CHwI). The current analysis compares prescribed and patient/caregiver-reported rFVIIa administration in paediatric and adult CHwI patients in this study. Patients with ≥ 4 bleeding episodes within a 3-month period prescribed rFVIIa as first-line therapy for bleeding episodes were eligible. Patients/caregivers completed a diary for ≥ 90 days or until the patient experienced four bleeds. Initial, total and mean rFVIIa doses reported for each bleeding episode were calculated and compared with the physician-prescribed doses. Of 52 enrolled patients (25 children; 27 adults), 39 (75%) completed the study. Children and adults had similar mean durations of bleeding episodes. Both patient groups were administered higher initial rFVIIa doses for joint bleeds than prescribed: median (range) 215.2 (74.1-400.0) mcg kg(-1) vs. 200.0 (61.0-270.0) mcg kg(-1) for children, and 231.3 (59.3-379.7) mcg kg(-1) vs. 123.0 (81.0-289.0) mcg kg(-1) for adults. The median infused dose for joint bleeds was higher in adults than children (175.2 vs. 148.0 mcg kg(-1) ), but children received significantly more doses per joint bleed than adults (median 6.5 vs. 3.0). The median total dose per joint bleed was higher in children than adults (1248.7 vs. 441.6). For children and adults, both initial and additional doses administered for bleeds were higher than prescribed. Children received higher total doses per bleed due to an increased number of infusions per bleed.

[Risk assessment of thrombotic events after the use of activated factor VII]. / Evaluación del riesgo de fenómenos trombóticos tras el uso de factor vii activado.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to analyze the incidence of thrombotic complications related to recombinant human factor viia (rFVIIa) therapy for severe postoperative bleeding in cardiac surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective matched case-control study was conducted over two years, including 72 children admitted to intensive care unit and treated with rFVIIa because of a severe bleeding during or after cardiac surgery. A control group of 63 patients was chosen, who were statistically comparable in sex, weight, diagnosis, surgical risk according RASCH-1 score, and surgical characteristics, was chosen. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between cases and controls either in the rate of thrombosis (20% vs 28%, P=.540), or in the mortality rate (16% vs 9.5%, P=.208). CONCLUSIONS: In our study, the rFVIIa therapy was shown to be useful in controlling severe operative bleeding in pediatric cardiac surgery, but does not seem to increase the risk of thrombotic complications or mortality rate in the postoperative period.

How we use recombinant activated Factor VII in patients with haemophilia A or B complicated by inhibitors. Working group of hematology experts from Australia and New Zealand, Melbourne, April 2011.

The management of bleeds in patients with haemophilia A or B complicated by inhibitors is complex. Recombinant activated Factor VII (rFVIIa; NovoSeven RT) is an established therapy in these patients. To develop a consensus-based guide on the practical usage of rFVIIa in haemophilia complicated by inhibitors, nine expert haemophilia specialists from Australia and New Zealand developed practice points on the usage of rFVIIa, based on their experience and supported by published data. Practice points were developed for 13 key topics: control of acute bleeding; prophylaxis; surgical prophylaxis; control of breakthrough bleeding during surgery or treatment of acute bleeds; paediatric use; use in elderly; intracranial haemorrhage; immune tolerance induction; difficult bleeds; clinical monitoring of therapy; laboratory monitoring of therapy; concomitant antifibrinolytic medication; practical dosing. Access to home therapy with rFVIIa is important in allowing patients to administer treatment early in bleed management. In adults, 90-120 µg/kg is the favoured starting dose in most settings. Initial dosing using 90-180 µg/kg is recommended for children due to the effect of age on the pharmacokinetics of rFVIIa. In the management of acute bleeds, 2-hourly dosing is appropriate until bleeding is controlled, with concomitant antifibrinolytic medication unless contraindicated. The practice points provide guidance on the usage of rFVIIa for all clinicians involved in the management of haemophilia complicated by inhibitors.

Intraoperative use of low-dose recombinant activated factor VII during thoracic aortic operations.

BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have supported the effectiveness of recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) for the control of bleeding after cardiac procedures; however safety concerns persist. Here we report the novel use of intraoperative low-dose rFVIIa in thoracic aortic operations, a strategy intended to improve safety by minimizing rFVIIa exposure. METHODS: Between July 2005 and December 2010, 425 consecutive patients at a single referral center underwent thoracic aortic operations with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB); 77 of these patients received intraoperative low-dose rFVIIa (≤60 µg/kg) for severe coagulopathy after CPB. Propensity matching produced a cohort of 88 patients (44 received intraoperative low-dose rFVIIa and 44 controls) for comparison. RESULTS: Matched patients receiving intraoperative low-dose rFVIIa got an initial median dose of 32 µg/kg (interquartile range [IQR], 16-43 µg/kg) rFVIIa given 51 minutes (42-67 minutes) after separation from CPB. Patients receiving intraoperative low-dose rFVIIa demonstrated improved postoperative coagulation measurements (partial thromboplastin time 28.6 versus 31.5 seconds; p=0.05; international normalized ratio, 0.8 versus 1.2; p<0.0001) and received 50% fewer postoperative blood product transfusions (2.5 versus 5.0 units; p=0.05) compared with control patients. No patient receiving intraoperative low-dose rFVIIa required postoperative rFVIIa administration or reexploration for bleeding. Rates of stroke, thromboembolism, myocardial infarction, and other adverse events were equivalent between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative low-dose rFVIIa led to improved postoperative hemostasis with no apparent increase in adverse events. Intraoperative rFVIIa administration in appropriately selected patients may correct coagulopathy early in the course of refractory blood loss and lead to improved safety through the use of smaller rFVIIa doses. Appropriately powered randomized studies are necessary to confirm the safety and efficacy of this approach.

No evidence or no alternative? Taking responsibility for off-label prescribing.

Recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) is registered for patients with rare haematological disorders, but is used 'off-label' in many other situations, including intracranial haemorrhage, cardiac surgery, trauma, transplantation and prostatectomy. Lack of systematic evidence to support these off-label uses has not slowed the growth of off-label prescribing of rFVIIa. We use the case of rFVIIa to illustrate the issues raised by off-label prescribing, and the kind of impasse that can arise when views about evidence, expertise and clinical necessity are in conflict. We argue that clinicians, hospital drug committees and regulators all need to acknowledge the complexity of prescribing decisions, and ensure that decisions to prescribe off-label are sufficiently justified.

[The role of recombinant activated factor VII in neuro- surgical and neurocritical patients]. / Rol del factor VII recombinante activado en pacientes neuroquirúrgicos y neu- rocríticos.

Central nervous system haemorrhage is a severe pathology, as a small amount of bleeding inside the brain can result in devastating consequences. Haemostatic agents might decrease the consequences of intra- cranial bleeding, whichever spontaneous, traumatic, or anticoagulation treatment etiology. Proacogulant recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) has been given after central nervous system bleeding, with an off-label indication. In this update, we go over the drug mechanism of action, its role in the treatment of central nervous system haemorrhage and the published evidences regarding this subject. We carried out a literature review concerning the treatment with rFVIIa in central nervous system haemorrhage, neurocritical pathologies and neurosurgical procedures, searching in MEDLINE and in clinical trials registry: http://clinicaltrials.gov (last review September 2010), as well as performing a manual analysis of collected articles, looking for aditional references. The results of randomized clinical trials do not support the systematic administration of rFVIIa for spontaneous intracranial cerebral haemorrhage. In other central nervous system related haemorrhages, the current available data consist on retrospective studies, expert opinion or isolated case reports.

Administration of recombinant activated factor VII in the intensive care unit after complex cardiovascular surgery: clinical and economic outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Refractory bleeding after complex cardiovascular surgery often leads to increased length of stay, cost, morbidity, and mortality. Recombinant activated factor VII administered in the intensive care unit can reduce bleeding, transfusion, and surgical re-exploration. We retrospectively compared factor VII administration in the intensive care unit with reoperation for refractory bleeding after complex cardiovascular surgery. METHODS: From 1501 patients who underwent cardiovascular procedures between December 2003 and September 2007, 415 high-risk patients were identified. From this cohort, 24 patients were divided into 2 groups based on whether they either received factor VII in the intensive care unit (n = 12) or underwent reoperation (n = 12) for refractory bleeding. Preoperative and postoperative data were collected to compare efficacy, safety, and economic outcomes. RESULTS: In-hospital survival for both groups was 100%. Factor VII was comparable with reoperation in achieving hemostasis, with both groups demonstrating decreases in chest tube output and need for blood products. Freedom from reoperation was achieved in 75% of patients receiving factor VII, whereas reoperation was effective in achieving hemostasis alone in 83.3% of patients. Prothrombin time, international normalized ratio, and median operating room time were significantly less (P < .05) in patients who received factor VII. Both groups had no statistically significant differences in other efficacy, safety, or economic outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Factor VII administration in the intensive care unit appears comparable with reoperation for refractory bleeding after complex cardiovascular surgical procedures and might represent an alternative to reoperation in selected patients. Future prospective, randomized controlled trials might further define its role.

Recombinant factor VIIa: an assessment of evidence regarding its efficacy and safety in the off-label setting.

Recombinant human factor VIIa (rFVIIa) is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for use in the setting of hemorrhage associated with factor VIII or factor IX inhibitors in patients with congenital or acquired hemophilia. This indication represents only a small number of bleeding conditions. Since it became available, rFVIIa has been increasingly used in the management of off-label indications, ranging from emergent hemostasis in traumatic hemorrhage to prophylactic hemostasis in patients undergoing major surgery. Prominent off-label indications include the management of patients with coagulopathies, such as occurs in trauma patients experiencing massive and uncontrolled hemorrhage, and in patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Other occasions for use occur in patients with intact coagulation systems, with nontraumatic intracranial hemorrhage being the most common in this group. Uncertainties regarding the efficacy and safety associated with use of rFVIIa in these off-label scenarios have led to evidence-based assessments of patient outcomes, including mortality, the rate of thromboembolic adverse events, and posttreatment functional status. We review the evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of this important, but controversial, hemostatic agent in the off-label setting.

Recombinant coagulation factor VIIa--from molecular to clinical aspects of a versatile haemostatic agent.

Recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa, NovoSeven) is currently the only bypassing agent produced by recombinant technology for the treatment of haemophiliacs whose disease is complicated by inhibitory antibodies. In addition, recombinant production of FVIIa has made it widely available for a variety of purposes and accelerated the growth of our knowledge about FVIIa by generating an abundance of clinical and biochemical data. This fascinating molecule has turned out to be a safe haemostatic agent with great potential in the clinic and has inspired the generation of improved variants currently in (pre-)clinical testing. The present review describes the structural and functional aspects of FVIIa, followed by sections dealing with the manufacturing, therapeutic mechanism of action, clinical development and experience with rFVIIa.

Coagulation factor VIIa (recombinant) in nonhemophilic patients requiring neurosurgery.

PURPOSE: The clinical outcomes, safety, and use of resources associated with the administration of factor VIIa (recombinant) to nonhemophilic patients requiring neurosurgery were evaluated. METHODS: An interdisciplinary group created guidelines for the pharmacy and therapeutics committee for the unlabeled use of factor VIIa (recombinant). Nonhemophilic patients were eligible to receive the agent without approval from the hematology-coagulation service if they had an intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), were undergoing an emergency neurosurgical procedure, and had coagulopathy. A standard single dose of 40 microg/kg was recommended for these patients. Data were prospectively collected between March 2004 and March 2006 for all neurological surgery patients receiving factor VIIa (recombinant). RESULTS: A total of 92 nonhemophilic patients received single doses of factor VIIa (recombinant) under the guidelines during the two-year study period. The majority of patients had a baseline International Normalized Ratio (INR) of >2, underwent emergency neurosurgical procedures, and had an intracranial hemorrhage. All guideline criteria for indication and approval were followed for 48 patients. Eighty-seven patients received concomitant treatment for reversal of anticoagulation. A significant correction in the baseline INR after administration of factor VIIa (recombinant) was noted (p < 0.0001). Five patients experienced adverse events. Implementation of the guidelines decreased the annual cost of factor VIIa (recombinant) by 46%. CONCLUSION: A protocol calling for administration of factor VIIa (recombinant) 40 microg/kg in nonhemophilic patients with coagulopathy and ICH led to a rapid and significant decrease in the INR, allowing for emergency surgical intervention. Few adverse events were detected in these patients, and none were deemed to be directly related to factor VIIa (recombinant).

Recombinant activated factor VII in the treatment of non-haemophilia patients: physician under-reporting of thromboembolic adverse events.

The objective of this study was to determine if clinically important thromboembolic adverse events (TAEs) because of recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) administration are being under-reported. rFVIIa is a potent haemostatic agent with a short half-life of 2.6 h that is increasingly used in 'off-label' situations. Retrospective review of 94 patients who received rFVIIa during 1 January 2003 to 30 June 2007 was carried out at a tertiary care centre. Sixty-nine patients, 32 females and 37 males, mean age 55 years (18-84 years), satisfied study criteria of off-label usage. This was a high-risk population with 33 (48%) deaths. A mean dose of 8.2 mg (2.4-19.2 mg) was administered in two average divided doses. Thirty-six potential TAEs were identified in 29 patients, and of these, 12 patients had TAEs deemed to be rFVIIa related and were identified on average 8.8 days after exposure to rFVIIa. Forty-eight (70%) physician questionnaires were completed; however, no TAEs were reported in these questionnaires or on chart review. Potential clinically significant TAEs are being under-reported by treating physicians. Until further evidence, we suggest the urgent need to develop consensus recommendations for utilization and required follow up to monitor the safety of rFVIIa and that at a minimum, all use of rFVIIa should be regulated through a gate-keeping mechanism that ensures adherence to these policies. Furthermore, prospective registries and trials are necessary to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rFVIIa in off-label settings.

Prophylaxis in 10 patients with severe haemophilia A and inhibitor: different approaches for different clinical situations.

The effect of bypassing agents is not as predictable as replacement therapy with the deficient factor in inhibitor patients. Consequently, these patients have more levels of arthropathy than patients without inhibitors. Prophylaxis for inhibitor patients has gained attention over the last decade and some papers have reported that bypassing agents could work in the prevention of arthropathy. However, there is a lack data to support any specific agent or regimen or even to recommend their use in different clinical conditions. We report ten patients with haemophilia A and inhibitors treated prophylacticaly with bypassing agents (5 with FEIBA and 5 with NovoSeven). The variable conditioning the choice of one agent or the other was the intention to initiate of immune tolerance induction therapy (ITI) in the future. In 8/10 patients (4 in FEIBA group and 4 in rFVIIa group) there was a decrease of bleeding episodes while 9/10 maintained or increased their joint range of motion (ROM). In the rFVIIa prophylaxis group, prophylaxis can be considered primary since all of them had had less than one joint bleed before prophylaxis. Economic analysis showed that prophylaxis is an expensive treatment. In our experience both agents seem to be safe and effective in reducing the number of bleeds in patients with inhibitors. The anamnestic response provoked by FEIBA could be an issue while awaiting a decline in titres before ITI can be initiated and so rFVIIa may be the best option for prophylaxis in patients with inhibitors who have not yet begun ITI.

Recombinant activated factor VII use in critically ill infants with active hemorrhage.

INTRODUCTION: Recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) is infrequently used off-label in infants despite a paucity of data in this population. We report a retrospective review of rFVIIa use in infants focusing on safety and efficacy. METHOD: Between 2002 and 2007, 32 critically ill nonhemophiliac infants less than 1 year old received rFVIIa at our institution. Indications of rFVIIa and post-rFVIIa venous thrombosis were reviewed. Transfusion requirements were calculated 8 hours before and after rFVIIa administration. RESULTS: Infants received on average 2 doses of rFVIIa at a mean dosage of 90 microg/kg. Active hemorrhage was the indication for rFVIIa in 24 infants, which included postoperative bleeding in 16 and nonsurgical bleeding in 8. The remaining 8 infants had preoperative coagulopathy. Thrombosis was noted in 4 infants (13%) and was not related to transfusion requirements, the number of doses, or dosage of rFVIIa. For infants who had active hemorrhage, rFVIIa was able to significantly reduce the requirements of packed red blood cells by 36.17 mL/kg (P < .005), platelets by 10.31 mL/kg (P < .01), and cryoprecipitates by 2.19 mL/kg (P < .05). CONCLUSION: This is the first large case series demonstrating the efficacy of rFVIIa in critically ill infants with active hemorrhage by reducing their transfusion requirements. Furthermore, venous thrombosis was not associated with increase in either the number of doses or dosage of rFVIIa.