Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 26
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Tokai J Exp Clin Med ; 45(4): 230-235, 2020 Dec 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33300595

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To review patients who were treated at Tokai University Hospital with biologic agents for psoriasis vulgaris and psoriatic arthritis and analyze the biological retention rate, reasons for switching biologics, and investigate possible clinical prognostic factor which may affect whether a patient preferred one biologic to another. METHODS: Clinical courses of 63 patients who received biologic agents between Sep of 2010 to June of 2019 were investigated. Biological retention rate of each biologic agents, reasons of switching to another biologic agent, and prognostic factors, if any, between switched and non-switched patients were examined. RESULTS: The biological retention rate of ustekinumab (UST) was significantly longer than that of infliximab (IFX) or adalimumab (ADA). The major reason of switching was due to secondary loss of efficacy. Patients being treated with UST were more likely to switch to another biologic when they exhibited nail lesions. CONCLUSION: These results suggested that biological retention rate of UST was superior than that of IFX or ADA. Furthermore, with patients administered UST, nail symptom suggested possible clinical prognostic factor for switching to other biologic agents.


Assuntos
Adalimumab/uso terapêutico , Fatores Biológicos/uso terapêutico , Raciocínio Clínico , Substituição de Medicamentos , Infliximab/uso terapêutico , Psoríase/tratamento farmacológico , Ustekinumab/uso terapêutico , Adalimumab/efeitos adversos , Adalimumab/economia , Adulto , Artrite Psoriásica/tratamento farmacológico , Fatores Biológicos/efeitos adversos , Fatores Biológicos/economia , Feminino , Humanos , Infliximab/efeitos adversos , Infliximab/economia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doenças da Unha/etiologia , Prognóstico , Prurido/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Ustekinumab/efeitos adversos , Ustekinumab/economia
2.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm ; 26(4): 417-490, 2020 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32223608

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There is a need for postmarketing evidence generation for novel biologics and biosimilars. OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility, strengths, and limitations of the Biologics and Biosimilars Collective Intelligence Consortium (BBCIC) Distributed Research Network (DRN) to examine the utilization and comparative safety of immune-modulating agents among patients with autoimmune diseases. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study among patients enrolled in health insurance plans participating in the BBCIC DRN between January 1, 2006, and September 30, 2015. Eligible patients were adult (≥18 years) new users of a disease-modifying nonbiologic and/or biologic agent with a prior diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), other inflammatory conditions (psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis), or inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Follow-up started at treatment initiation and ended at the earliest of outcome occurrence (serious infection); treatment discontinuation; or switching, death, disenrollment, or end of study period. The study leveraged the FDA Sentinel System infrastructure for data management and analysis; descriptive statistics of patient characteristics and unadjusted incidence rates of study outcomes during follow-up were calculated. RESULTS: Eligible patient drug episodes included 111,611 with RA (75% female), 61,050 with other inflammatory conditions (51% female), and 30,628 with IBD (52% female). Across all 3 cohorts, approximately half of the patient drug episodes initiated a biologic (50% in RA; 60% in psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis; and 55% in IBD). The crude incidence rate of serious infection was 9.8 (9.5-10.0) cases per 100 person-years in RA, 7.1 (6.8-7.5) in other inflammatory conditions, and 14.2 (13.6-14.8) in IBD patients. CONCLUSIONS: This study successfully identified large numbers of new users of biologics and produced results that were consistent with those from earlier published studies. The BBCIC DRN is a potential resource for surveillance of biologics. DISCLOSURES: This study was funded by the Biologics and Biosimilars Collective Intelligence Consortium (BBCIC). HealthCore conducted this study in collaboration with Harvard Pilgrim Health Care. Zhang and Sridhar were employed by HealthCore at the time of this study. Haynes is employed by HealthCore funded by PCORI, the NIH, and the FDA. Barr and Eichelberger were employed by AMCP at the time of this study. Lockhart is employed by the BBCIC. Holmes and Clewell are employed by AbbVie. Accrott is an employee of and shareholder in Amgen. Marshall and Brown are employed by Harvard Pilgrim Health Care. Barr is a shareholder in Roche/Genentech. Curtis has received research grants from and consults with the following: Amgen, AbbVie, BMS, CORRONA, Lilly, Janssen, Myriad, Pfizer, Roche, Regeneron, and UCB. Brown has received research grants from GSK and Pfizer and consulting fees from Bayer, Roche, and Jazz Pharmaceuticals, along with funding from the Reagan-Udall Foundation for the FDA to conduct studies for medical product manufacturers, including Eli Lilly, Novartis, Abbvie, and Merck. Brown is also funded by PCORI, the NIH, and the FDA. McMahill-Walraven subcontracts with Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute for public health and safety surveillance distributed data network activtities and with the FDA, GSK, and Pfizer. She also reports fees from Reagan Udall Foundation for the FDA and the Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute.


Assuntos
Fatores Biológicos/administração & dosagem , Medicamentos Biossimilares/administração & dosagem , Monitoramento de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Artrite Reumatoide/tratamento farmacológico , Artrite Reumatoide/imunologia , Fatores Biológicos/efeitos adversos , Medicamentos Biossimilares/efeitos adversos , Monitoramento de Medicamentos/métodos , Uso de Medicamentos/economia , Uso de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Incidência , Infecções/induzido quimicamente , Infecções/imunologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Psoríase/tratamento farmacológico , Psoríase/imunologia , Projetos de Pesquisa , Estudos Retrospectivos , Espondilite Anquilosante/tratamento farmacológico , Espondilite Anquilosante/imunologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
3.
Food Chem Toxicol ; 116(Pt A): 60-65, 2018 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29458165

RESUMO

Micro-organisms are increasingly used in a variety of products for commercial uses, including cleaning products. Such microbial-based cleaning products (MBCP) are represented as a more environmentally-friendly alternative to chemically based cleaning products. The identity of the micro-organisms formulated into these products is often considered confidential business information and is not revealed or it is only partly revealed (i.e., identification to the genus, not to the species). That paucity of information complicates the evaluation of the risk associated with their use. The accurate taxonomic identification of those micro-organisms is important so that a suitable risk assessment of the products can be conducted. To alleviate difficulties associated with adequate identification of micro-organisms in MBCP and other products containing micro-organisms, a microbial identification framework for risk assessment (MIFRA) has been elaborated. It serves to provide guidance on a polyphasic tiered approach, combining the data obtained from the use of various methods (i.e., polyphasic approach) combined with the sequential selection of the methods (i.e., tiered) to achieve a satisfactory identity of the micro-organism to an acceptable taxonomic level. The MIFRA is suitable in various risk assessment contexts for micro-organisms used in any commercial product.


Assuntos
Bactérias/química , Fatores Biológicos/efeitos adversos , Detergentes/efeitos adversos , Medição de Risco/métodos , Bactérias/metabolismo , Biodegradação Ambiental , Fatores Biológicos/análise , Qualidade de Produtos para o Consumidor , Detergentes/análise , Humanos
4.
Food Chem Toxicol ; 116(Pt A): 53-59, 2018 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29175184

RESUMO

Biological degreasing stations (BDSs) are used by mechanics. These BDSs use a water-based solution with a microbial degradation process. Occupational exposure during the use of BDSs has not been reported and few studies have identified the bacteria present. The objectives were to measure the concentration of microorganisms during BDSs' use and monitor the bacterial community in the liquid over time. Five mechanical workshops were studied. Six 30-min samples were taken at each workshop over one year. Bioaerosols in the ambient air samples were collected with Andersen impactors near the BDS Bioaerosols in the workers' breathing zone (WBZ) were collected on filters. Fresh bio-degreasing fluids were collected from unopened containers, and used bio-degreasing fluids were collected in the BDS. The results show that the use of BDSs does not seem to increase bioaerosols concentrations in the WBZ (concentrations lower than 480 CFU/m3) and that the bacterial communities (mainly yeasts, Bacillus subtilis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa) in the bio-degreasing fluids change through time and differ from the original community (B. subtilis). This study established that workers using BDSs were exposed to low levels of bioaerosols. No respiratory protection is recommended based on bioaerosols concentrations, but gloves and strict personal hygiene practices are essential.


Assuntos
Poluentes Ocupacionais do Ar/efeitos adversos , Bactérias/química , Fatores Biológicos/efeitos adversos , Detergentes/efeitos adversos , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Aerossóis/efeitos adversos , Aerossóis/análise , Fatores Biológicos/análise , Detergentes/análise , Humanos
5.
Food Chem Toxicol ; 116(Pt A): 42-52, 2018 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29175187

RESUMO

Non-pathogenic Bacillus species used in cleaning products produce the appropriate enzymes to degrade stains and soils. However, there is little scientific data regarding the human exposure by inhalation of Bacillus spores during or after use of microbial-based cleaning products. Herein, air samples were collected at various locations in a ventilated, carpeted, residential room to determine the air concentration of viable bacteria and spores during and after the application of microbial-based carpet cleaning products containing Bacillus spores. The influence of human activities and vacuuming was investigated. Bioaerosol levels associated with use and post-application activities of whole room carpet treatments were elevated during post-application activity, but quickly returned to the indoor background range. Use of trigger spray spot applications generated aerosolized spores in the immediate vicinity, however, their use pattern and the generation of mostly non-respirable particles suggest minimal risks for pulmonary exposure from their use. The aerosol counts associated with use of these microbial-based cleaners were below the recommendation for safe exposure levels to non-pathogenic and non-toxigenic microorganisms except during application of the spot cleaner. The data presented suggest that carpet cleaning products, containing non-pathogenic Bacillus spores present a low potential for inhalation exposure and consequently minimal risk of adverse effects.


Assuntos
Bacillus/química , Fatores Biológicos/efeitos adversos , Detergentes/efeitos adversos , Exposição por Inalação/efeitos adversos , Aerossóis/análise , Fatores Biológicos/química , Qualidade de Produtos para o Consumidor , Detergentes/química , Pisos e Cobertura de Pisos , Humanos , Exposição por Inalação/análise , Esporos Bacterianos/química
7.
Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol ; 12(8): 923-35, 2016 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27266955

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Topical, systemic, oral disease modifying, and biologic agents are part of the armamentarium to manage psoriatic disease. The choice of therapy depends upon disease severity, relevant co-morbidities and patient preference. There is great variability in patient response with these agents, and there is still no clear method of selecting the preferred therapeutic agent for efficacy or lack of adverse events. AREAS COVERED: This article will review the pharmacogenetic and pharmacogenomic targets that are currently known with respect to psoriasis vulgaris, and the most frequent co-morbidity of psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis. EXPERT OPINION: Presently, no clinically actionable biomarker exists for any therapeutic agent used to treat psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis. The lack of validated outcome measures and conflicting results of open-label studies conducted may be attributed to a multitude of issues that confound discovery. Consequently, studies have been underpowered to identify genes or genetic variants worth translating to clinical practice. In order to achieve a pharmacogenetic/pharmacogenomic signature, improvements in study design of future investigations are required, including carefully designed prospective studies. It is imperative to combine known clinical, serological, and molecular markers with consistent outcomes and an adequate health economic evaluation before they can be adopted widely in clinical practice.


Assuntos
Artrite Psoriásica/tratamento farmacológico , Farmacogenética/métodos , Psoríase/tratamento farmacológico , Administração Cutânea , Administração Oral , Artrite Psoriásica/genética , Artrite Psoriásica/patologia , Fatores Biológicos/administração & dosagem , Fatores Biológicos/efeitos adversos , Fatores Biológicos/uso terapêutico , Fármacos Dermatológicos/administração & dosagem , Fármacos Dermatológicos/efeitos adversos , Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Psoríase/genética , Psoríase/patologia , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
8.
Drug Discov Today ; 21(1): 58-71, 2016 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26272036

RESUMO

During recent years, various in silico approaches have been developed to estimate chemical and biological drug features, for example chemical fragments, protein targets, pathways, among others, that correlate with adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and explain the associated mechanisms. These features have also been used for the creation of predictive models that enable estimation of ADRs during the early stages of drug development. In this review, we discuss various in silico approaches to predict these features for a certain drug, estimate correlations with ADRs, establish causal relationships between selected features and ADR mechanisms and create corresponding predictive models.


Assuntos
Simulação por Computador , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos , Animais , Fatores Biológicos/efeitos adversos , Descoberta de Drogas/métodos , Humanos , Preparações Farmacêuticas/administração & dosagem
9.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 73(3): 420-8.e1, 2015 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26184440

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Safety profiles of systemic biologic agents for the treatment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) encompass a wide spectrum of adverse events. To date, no uniform evidence-based guidelines exist regarding screening and monitoring patients who are undergoing biologic therapy. OBJECTIVE: We sought to identify studies evaluating screening and monitoring tests in the treatment of psoriasis and PsA with systemic biologic agents, and to propose evidence-based practical guidelines. METHODS: The MEDLINE database was searched to identify data on risks associated with adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab, and ustekinumab. Articles were reviewed and graded according to methods developed by the US Preventative Services Task Force. RESULTS: Evidence was strongest (grade B) for tuberculosis screening. Interferon-gamma release assay was preferable to tuberculin skin testing. Among known hepatitis B virus carriers, the evidence grade was C for monitoring liver function tests and viral load. LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by the lack of high-quality controlled trials evaluating screening and monitoring tests in patients treated with biologic agents. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline tuberculosis testing remains the only screening test with strong evidence to support its practice. Other screening and monitoring tests commonly performed in patients who are taking biologic agents are supported only in certain clinical settings or lack evidence to support or recommend against their practice.


Assuntos
Artrite Psoriásica/tratamento farmacológico , Fatores Biológicos/uso terapêutico , Programas de Rastreamento/normas , Monitorização Fisiológica/normas , Psoríase/tratamento farmacológico , Adalimumab/efeitos adversos , Adalimumab/uso terapêutico , Artrite Psoriásica/diagnóstico , Fatores Biológicos/efeitos adversos , Terapia Biológica/efeitos adversos , Terapia Biológica/métodos , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Infliximab/efeitos adversos , Infliximab/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Programas de Rastreamento/tendências , Monitorização Fisiológica/tendências , Segurança do Paciente , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Psoríase/diagnóstico , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Medição de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento , Ustekinumab/efeitos adversos , Ustekinumab/uso terapêutico
10.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 70(2): 527-34, 2014 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25223566

RESUMO

Paecilomyces tenuipes is entomogenous fungus that is called snow-flake Dongchunghacho in Korea. Although it is widely used in traditional medicines, its safety has not yet been comprehensively investigated. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the genotoxicity, acute and subchronic toxicity of P. tenuipes. The acute oral LD50 of P. tenuipes extract in rats was estimated to be greater than 2000mg/kg of body weight. In the subchronic study, the oral treatment of rats with 500, 1000 or 2000mg/kg P. tenuipes extract daily for 13weeks did not induce any dose-related changes (body weight, food consumption, clinical observation, urinalysis, hematology, clinical chemistry and organ weight). In contrast, histopathological observation revealed that P. tenuipes extract induced karyomegaly in outer medulla of kidney in all treated rats. Importantly, P. tenuipes extract exerted the mutagenic potential in Ames assay. Since karyomegalic alterations have been known to be associated with carcinogenicity, our finding on the mutagenicity of P. tenuipes extract supports the possibility on the potential involvement of P. tenuipes in carcinogenicity at least partially. In conclusion, the subchronic oral exposure of P. tenuipes may induce kidney abnormality at the concentration higher than 500mg/kg body weight, although further studies using other animal models are needed to identify the toxicity of P. tenuipes.


Assuntos
Fatores Biológicos/efeitos adversos , Rim/efeitos dos fármacos , Medicina Tradicional/efeitos adversos , Mutagênicos/efeitos adversos , Paecilomyces/metabolismo , Animais , Peso Corporal/efeitos dos fármacos , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Feminino , Masculino , Testes de Mutagenicidade/métodos , Tamanho do Órgão/efeitos dos fármacos , Ratos , Ratos Sprague-Dawley , República da Coreia , Testes de Toxicidade Subcrônica/métodos
11.
Nat Rev Rheumatol ; 10(10): 612-27, 2014 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25112605

RESUMO

Biologic agents have substantially advanced the treatment of immunological disorders, including chronic inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. However, these drugs are often associated with adverse events (AEs), including allergic, immunological and other unwanted reactions. AEs can affect almost any organ or system in the body and can occur immediately, within minutes to hours, or with a delay of several days or more after initiation of biologic therapy. Although some AEs are a direct consequence of the functional inhibition of biologic-agent-targeted antigens, the pathogenesis of other AEs results from a drug-induced imbalance of the immune system, intermediary factors and cofactors, a complexity that complicates their prediction. Herein, we review the AEs associated with biologic therapy most relevant to rheumatic and immunological diseases, and discuss their underlying pathogenesis. We also include our recommendations for the medical management of such AEs. Increased understanding and improved risk management of AEs induced by biologic agents will enable better use of these versatile immune-response modifiers.


Assuntos
Fatores Biológicos/efeitos adversos , Hipersensibilidade/etiologia , Doenças do Sistema Imunitário/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções/imunologia , Doenças Reumáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Fatores Biológicos/imunologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/etiologia , Gastroenteropatias/etiologia , Doenças Hematológicas/etiologia , Humanos , Infecções/etiologia , Pneumopatias/etiologia , Doenças Metabólicas/etiologia , Neoplasias/etiologia , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso/etiologia , Gestão de Riscos , Dermatopatias/etiologia , Vacinação/efeitos adversos , Viroses/etiologia
12.
PLoS One ; 9(6): e101163, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24979754

RESUMO

Biological agents pose a serious threat to human health, economic development, social stability and even national security. The classification of biological agents is a basic requirement for both biosafety and biodefense. We compared and analyzed the Biological Agent Laboratory Biosafety Category list and the defining criteria according to the World Health Organization (WHO), the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the European Union (EU) and China. We also compared and analyzed the Biological Agent Biodefense Category list and the defining criteria according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) of the United States, the EU and Russia. The results show some inconsistencies among or between the two types of category lists and criteria. We suggest that the classification of biological agents based on laboratory biosafety should reduce the number of inconsistencies and contradictions. Developing countries should also produce lists of biological agents to direct their development of biodefense capabilities.To develop a suitable biological agent list should also strengthen international collaboration and cooperation.


Assuntos
Fatores Biológicos/efeitos adversos , Bioterrorismo/prevenção & controle , Substâncias Perigosas/efeitos adversos , Humanos
13.
Femina ; 42(1): 3-10, jan-fev. 2014.
Artigo em Português | LILACS | ID: lil-749135

RESUMO

O câncer de mama e seu tratamento afetam amplamente a sexualidade das mulheres acometidas. O impacto pode durar vários anos, mesmo após um tratamento bem-sucedido para a doença, decorrente dos diversos efeitos colaterais da terapêutica e dos eventos psíquicos resultantes do processo. Estudos mostram alterações físicas decorrentes da quimioterapia, hormonioterapia e tratamento cirúrgico que interferem na sexualidade, promovendo distúrbios no funcionamento sexual em suas diferentes fases, como desejo, excitação, lubrificação e orgasmo. Experiências psíquicas incluem medo da perda da fertilidade, imagem corporal negativa, sentimento de não ser sexualmente atraente, depressão e ansiedade, enquanto fatores sociais e relacionais exercem influência sobre o ajuste ao tratamento e à doença. A qualidade prévia do relacionamento com o parceiro é considerada o mais importante fator preditivo da qualidade do relacionamento sexual após o término do tratamento. Conclui-se que o estudo da sexualidade no contexto do câncer de mama não pode considerar separadamente os aspectos físicos dos psicossociais, e que a identificação das causas dos diferentes tipos de disfunção sexual neste subgrupo possibilita o desenvolvimento de intervenções fisiológicas e psicossociais que contribuam para a manutenção da qualidade da atividade sexual.(AU)


Breast cancer and its treatment widely affect the sexuality of female patients. The impact may last for several years, even after successful treatment of the disease, due to the many side effects of the treatment and psychical events that emerge from the process. Studies refer to physical changes derived from chemotherapy, hormone therapy and surgical treatment, that intervenes in the sexuality, promoting disturbances regarding sexuality in different phases, such as desire, arousal, lubrication and orgasm. Psychical experiences include fear of losing fertility, negative body image, feeling of not being sexually attractive, depression and anxiety, while social and relational factors affect the adjustment to the treatment and the disease. The previous quality of the relationship with the partner is considered the most important predictive factor of the quality of sexual relationship after the treatment. We conclude that the study of sexuality in the context of breast cancer must consider both physical and psychosocial aspects, and that identifying the causes of different types of sexual dysfunction in this subgroup will enable the development of physiological and psychosocial interventions that may contribute to maintaining the quality of sexual activity of the patients.(AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Feminino , Neoplasias da Mama/psicologia , Mastectomia Segmentar/psicologia , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Sexualidade , Mastectomia/psicologia , Qualidade de Vida/psicologia , Disfunções Sexuais Fisiológicas/tratamento farmacológico , Disfunções Sexuais Fisiológicas/terapia , Fatores Biológicos/efeitos adversos , Bases de Dados Bibliográficas , Disfunções Sexuais Psicogênicas/tratamento farmacológico , Disfunções Sexuais Psicogênicas/terapia
14.
Actas Dermosifiliogr ; 104(8): 694-709, 2013 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24018211

RESUMO

Biologic therapy is a well-established strategy for managing moderate and severe psoriasis. Nevertheless, the high cost of such therapy, the relatively short span of clinical experience with biologics, and the abundance of literature now available on these agents have made evidence-based and consensus-based clinical guidelines necessary. The ideal goal of psoriasis treatment is to achieve complete or nearly complete clearing of lesions and to maintain it over time. Failing that ideal, the goal would be to reduce involvement to localized lesions that can be controlled with topical therapy. Although current evidence allows us to directly or indirectly compare the efficacy or risk of primary or secondary failure of available biologics based on objective outcomes, clinical trial findings cannot be directly translated to routine practice. As a result, the prescribing physician must tailor the treatment regimen to the individual patient. This update of the clinical practice guidelines issued by the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (AEDV) on biologic therapy for psoriasis incorporates information from the most recent publications on this topic.


Assuntos
Fatores Biológicos/uso terapêutico , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Psoríase/tratamento farmacológico , Acitretina/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Artrite Psoriásica/tratamento farmacológico , Fatores Biológicos/efeitos adversos , Fatores Biológicos/economia , Criança , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Terapia Combinada , Análise Custo-Benefício , Substituição de Medicamentos , Feminino , Humanos , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Metanálise como Assunto , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto , Fotoquimioterapia , Gravidez , Complicações na Gravidez/tratamento farmacológico , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores Sexuais , Espanha , Falha de Tratamento , Resultado do Tratamento
15.
BioDrugs ; 27(4): 305-16, 2013 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23529766

RESUMO

The manufacturing of biologic medicines (biologics) requires robust process and facility design, rigorous regulatory compliance, and a well-trained workforce. Because of the complex attributes of biologics and their sensitivity to production and handling conditions, manufacturing of these medicines also requires a high-reliability manufacturing organization. As required by regulators, such an organization must monitor the state-of-control for the manufacturing process. A high-reliability organization also invests in an experienced and fully engaged technical support staff and fosters a management culture that rewards in-depth analysis of unexpected results, robust risk assessments, and timely and effective implementation of mitigation measures. Such a combination of infrastructure, technology, human capital, management, and a science-based operations culture does not occur without a strong organizational and financial commitment. These attributes of a high-reliability biologics manufacturer are difficult to achieve and may be differentiating factors as the supply of biologics diversifies in future years.


Assuntos
Prevenção de Acidentes , Fatores Biológicos/biossíntese , Produtos Biológicos/metabolismo , Gestão de Riscos , Fatores Biológicos/efeitos adversos , Fatores Biológicos/análise , Fatores Biológicos/química , Produtos Biológicos/efeitos adversos , Produtos Biológicos/análise , Produtos Biológicos/química , Biotecnologia/tendências , Química Farmacêutica , Contaminação de Medicamentos/prevenção & controle , Indústria Farmacêutica/tendências , Embalagem de Medicamentos , Estabilidade de Medicamentos , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Guias como Assunto , Humanos , Controle de Qualidade , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Medição de Risco , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration , Recursos Humanos
16.
J Clin Pharm Ther ; 38(2): 121-30, 2013 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23442134

RESUMO

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Psoriasis is a chronic skin disease for which there is an increasing range of treatment options. Biological agents (ustekinumab, adalimumab, infliximab and etanercept) are indicated for moderate-to-severe plaque-type psoriasis in adults who fail to respond to, have a contraindication to, or are intolerant to other systemic therapies including cyclosporine, methotrexate and PUVA Unfortunately, with new drugs, the pivotal trials leading to their licensing are often placebo-controlled trials rather than comparative trials vs. established therapies. Therefore, inference on comparative effectiveness of the newer agents must be derived indirectly, through estimation of effects of the new agents vs. a common comparator. The objective of this study is to compare the relative efficacy of the biological agents through a systematic review of the indirect clinical trial evidence. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed for clinical trials of biological agents in psoriasis. Pivotal, randomized, double-blind, controlled (placebo) trials using intention-to-treat analysis were selected for detailed analysis. Trials must include PASI 75 as a primary end point. The indirect comparison was performed using the method of Bucher adjusted with the ITC calculator (Indirect Treatment Comparisons of the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health), etanercept being the reference drug. We defined delta value for therapeutic equivalence as a difference in the efficacy of 25% among the different treatment options. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Fourteen studies (four for ustekinumab, three for adalimumab, three for infliximab and four for etanercept) were included. The indirect comparison results reveal that ustekinumab, adalimumab and infliximab were statistically superior to etanercept with an absolute risk difference for PASI 75 of 12% (95% CI = 5·9-18%), 11% (95% CI = 5·3-16·7%) and 24% (29·7-18·3%) respectively. However, in all situations, the 95% confidence interval does not achieve clinical relevance as no delta exceeds the previously set value (25%). WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Ustekinumab, adalimumab, infliximab and etanercept can be regarded as clinical equivalents for the treatment of psoriasis. Choice between these agents therefore depends on their relative safety profiles, individual contra-indications and cost effectiveness.


Assuntos
Fatores Biológicos/uso terapêutico , Psoríase/tratamento farmacológico , Adalimumab , Adulto , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/efeitos adversos , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/farmacocinética , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Monoclonais/efeitos adversos , Anticorpos Monoclonais/farmacocinética , Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/efeitos adversos , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/farmacocinética , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Fatores Biológicos/efeitos adversos , Fatores Biológicos/farmacocinética , Pesquisa Comparativa da Efetividade/métodos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Método Duplo-Cego , Etanercepte , Feminino , Humanos , Imunoglobulina G/efeitos adversos , Imunoglobulina G/uso terapêutico , Infliximab , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Psoríase/metabolismo , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Receptores do Fator de Necrose Tumoral/uso terapêutico , Equivalência Terapêutica , Ustekinumab
17.
Gig Sanit ; (5): 31-2, 2010.
Artigo em Russo | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21341490

RESUMO

The study of a biological factor at solid domestic waste-processing enterprises has established that air and the surface of technological equipment are highly contaminated with bacteria and molds.


Assuntos
Fatores Biológicos/efeitos adversos , Resíduos de Alimentos , Higiene , Eliminação de Resíduos/normas , Humanos
19.
Expert Opin Biol Ther ; 4(8): 1345-50, 2004 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15268667

RESUMO

Biologic pharmaceuticals are gaining in both market share and clinical utility compared with small molecule therapeutics. This market growth is, in part, reflective of a field of science entering its toddlerhood, where with increased maturity, both development timelines and costs of manufacturing for these complex molecules will decrease, further enhancing the profitability side of the equation. Although a firm understanding of the rules governing toxicity (especially antibody responses to therapeutic proteins) remains to be defined, it is clear that proteins are less prone to much of the idiosyncratic toxicity associated with small molecule drug candidates. Proteins are disadvantaged in that they are unlikely to find much use in targeting intercellular processes; however, they have clear strengths over small molecules in targeting protein-protein interactions and the specific targeting of surface features of particular cells (e.g., in oncology). As each aspect of protein pharmaceutical technology advances, it is clear that this will be the major area for growth in the industry over the next decade.


Assuntos
Fatores Biológicos/uso terapêutico , Produtos Biológicos/uso terapêutico , Biofarmácia/tendências , Anticorpos Monoclonais/efeitos adversos , Anticorpos Monoclonais/economia , Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Fatores Biológicos/efeitos adversos , Fatores Biológicos/economia , Produtos Biológicos/efeitos adversos , Produtos Biológicos/economia , Biofarmácia/economia , Aprovação de Drogas , Custos de Medicamentos , Sistemas de Liberação de Medicamentos , Desenho de Fármacos , Política de Saúde , Humanos , Peso Molecular , Proteínas/efeitos adversos , Proteínas/uso terapêutico , Proteínas Recombinantes/efeitos adversos , Proteínas Recombinantes/economia , Proteínas Recombinantes/uso terapêutico , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA