Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Surg Res ; 237: 140-147, 2019 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30914191

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Trauma recidivism accounts for approximately 44% of emergency department admissions and remains a significant health burden with this patient cohort carrying higher rates of morbidity and mortality. METHODS: A level 1 trauma center registry was queried for patients aged 18-25 y presented between 2009 and 2015. Patients with nonaccidental gunshot wounds, stab wounds, or blunt assault-related injuries were categorized as violent injuries. Primary outcomes included mortality and recidivism, which were defined as patients with two unrelated traumas during the study period. Hospital records and the Social Security Death Index were used to aid in outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 6484 patients presented with 1215 (18.7%) sustaining violent injuries (87.4% male, median age 22.2 y). Mechanism of violent injuries included 64.4% gunshot wound, 21.1% stab, and 14.8% blunt assault. Compared with nonviolent injuries, violent injury patients had increased risk of mortality (9.3% versus 2.1%, P < 0.0001). Out-of-hospital mortality was 2.6% (versus 0.5% nonviolent, P < 0.0005), with an average time to death being 6.4 mo from initial injury. Recidivism was 24.9% with mean time to second violent injury at 31.9 ± 21.0 mo; 14.9% had two trauma readmissions, and 8.0% had ≥3. Ninety percent of subsequent injuries occurred within 5 y, with 19.1% in the first year. CONCLUSIONS: The burden of injury after violent trauma extends past discharge as patients have significantly higher mortality rates following hospital release. Over one-quarter present with a second unrelated trauma or death. Improved medical, psychological, and social collaborative treatment of these high-risk patients is needed to interrupt the cycle of violent injury.


Assuntos
Vítimas de Crime/estatística & dados numéricos , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo/mortalidade , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/mortalidade , Ferimentos Perfurantes/mortalidade , Estudos de Coortes , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Vítimas de Crime/psicologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Recidiva , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos , Apoio Social , Centros de Traumatologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo/prevenção & controle , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/prevenção & controle , Ferimentos Perfurantes/prevenção & controle , Adulto Jovem
2.
Injury ; 43(11): 1898-902, 2012 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21561618

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Due to the infrequent occurrence of large animal-related injury (LARI) in many areas, their significance as a public health problem could be overlooked. The purpose of this study was to examine the demographics and injury disparities associated with LARI. METHODS: The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Inpatient Survey from 2001 was used to construct a cohort of patients admitted after LARI. Patients were stratified by age, gender, race, and median household income of patient's zip code. Where available total hospital charges were converted to cost using the hospital's cost-to-charge ratio. To determine variables associated with injury type, univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis were used. RESULTS: 2424 LARI admissions were identified within the database. The largest proportion of admitted patients were female (53.8%), Caucasian (64.6%), and from areas with median income >$45,000 (41.8%). Average hospital cost was $5062. Overall, the most common injuries were rib fractures (15.2%), vertebral fractures (11.6%) and haemo-pneumothorax (9%). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that age disparities with older patients receiving more rib fractures, haemo-pneumothorax, vertebral fractures, and pelvic fractures. Skull fractures and head injuries are disproportionately seen in younger patients. Gender disparities were also present, with females more likely to have vertebral fractures but less likely to have rib fractures and heart and lung injuries. CONCLUSIONS: Disparities based on age and gender are associated with hospital admission for LARI in the United States. These admissions have a significant impact on the healthcare system with nationwide cost estimates of nearly $60 million. These findings represent potential areas for targeted prevention efforts.


Assuntos
Mordeduras e Picadas/epidemiologia , Fraturas Ósseas/epidemiologia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Pneumotórax/epidemiologia , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/epidemiologia , Ferimentos Penetrantes/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Idoso , Análise de Variância , Animais , Mordeduras e Picadas/etiologia , Mordeduras e Picadas/prevenção & controle , Bovinos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Cães , Feminino , Fraturas Ósseas/etiologia , Fraturas Ósseas/prevenção & controle , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Cavalos , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pneumotórax/etiologia , Pneumotórax/prevenção & controle , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Distribuição por Sexo , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/etiologia , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/prevenção & controle , Ferimentos Penetrantes/etiologia , Ferimentos Penetrantes/prevenção & controle , Adulto Jovem
4.
J Trauma Nurs ; 14(1): 19-23, 2007.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17420647

RESUMO

Blunt trauma is the primary mechanism of injury seen at Charleston Area Medical Center, a rural level I trauma center. Blunt abdominal trauma occurs as a result of various mechanisms. It can be safely managed nonoperatively and is considered to be the standard of care in hemodynamically stable patients. Appropriate patient education before discharge will enable patients to identify complications early and seek appropriate medical care.


Assuntos
Traumatismos Abdominais/prevenção & controle , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/organização & administração , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/prevenção & controle , Traumatismos Abdominais/diagnóstico , Traumatismos Abdominais/epidemiologia , Diagnóstico Precoce , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Morbidade , Pesquisa em Educação em Enfermagem , Pesquisa em Avaliação de Enfermagem , Alta do Paciente , Projetos Piloto , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Projetos de Pesquisa , População Rural , Autocuidado , Centros de Traumatologia , West Virginia/epidemiologia , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/diagnóstico , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/epidemiologia
5.
J Trauma ; 57(6): 1218-24, 2004 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15625452

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Less-lethal technologies are used in situations where lethal force is not warranted; however, a variety of injuries have been reported. Design and injury criteria are needed to assess the safety of these munitions. METHODS: Injury data from ballistic impacts of cadavers were analyzed to validate design and injury criteria. Logistic regression analysis determined the predictive ability of the blunt criterion (BC) for munition design and the viscous criterion (VC) for injury risk assessment. Differences in risk for men and women were determined. RESULTS: For a 50% risk of Abbreviated Injury Scale 2 or 3 thoracic injury, BC = 0.37 (chi = 17.71, p = 0.001) and VCmax = 0.8 m/s (chi = 11.28, p = 0.001). The 5th percentile female subject has a 36% lower tolerance to ballistic energy than the 50the percentile male subject. CONCLUSION: The BC can be used in the development of kinetic energy munitions and the VC for testing impact injury risk. These criteria provide much needed tools for the development and progression of less-lethal munitions.


Assuntos
Armas de Fogo , Balística Forense , Aplicação da Lei , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/prevenção & controle , Idoso , Cadáver , Desenho de Equipamento , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Medicina Militar , Medição de Risco , Fatores Sexuais , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/fisiopatologia
6.
Am J Infect Control ; 27(5): 447-52, 1999 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10511494

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: An institutional review of sharps injuries was conducted to assist in establishing priorities for resource allocation in a sharps prevention program. DESIGN: A retrospective review of 221 sharps injuries occurring during a 1-year period was conducted by a 4-member multidisciplinary team. Each injury was categorized as either moderate/high, low, or unknown risk for acquisition of bloodborne diseases by using modified provincial definitions of occupational risk for exposure to bloodborne pathogens. RESULTS: A total of 119 injuries were considered to be moderate/high risk, and 93 were at low risk for acquisition of bloodborne disease. Nine injuries could not be categorized. In 59% of high-risk injuries, education or changes in technique were identified as the primary preventive intervention. Passive devices such as needleless intravenous administration sets could theoretically address prevention of the majority of low-risk injuries. Known available safety devices could have prevented 33 (28%) high-risk injuries. CONCLUSION: Disposition of resources must take into consideration the risk of bloodborne disease acquisition and the efficiency and expense of the preventable methods employed. Institutional review of injuries combined with a cost analysis revealed that resources were best allocated to protective devices at source (eg, safety syringes) and on a comprehensive, multidisciplinary, and sustained educational program. Needleless intravenous infusion sets would mainly prevent low-risk injuries at significant cost.


Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Unidades Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/epidemiologia , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/prevenção & controle , Colúmbia Britânica/epidemiologia , Custos e Análise de Custo , Alocação de Recursos para a Atenção à Saúde , Prioridades em Saúde , Humanos , Bombas de Infusão/economia , Ocupações , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/classificação
7.
Arch Surg ; 132(7): 778-81, 1997 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9230865

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a devastating occurrence with important consequences for the individual and society. Previous studies have documented the epidemiology and costs of SCI and the rehabilitation needs after SCI; however, data about the preventability of SCI are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To test the hypotheses that most SCIs are preventable and that much of the cost of SCI is borne by the public. DESIGN: Retrospective review of medical records and trauma registry data. SETTING: A 417-bed county hospital with a level I trauma center. METHODS: To evaluate the preventability of SCI, the records of trauma patients sustaining SCI from July 1, 1990, through June 30, 1995, were reviewed. The criteria for preventability of blunt injuries included the following: failure to use restraint devices; intoxication of drivers, motorcyclists, or pedestrians; and falls or diving accidents involving the use of drugs or alcohol. The criteria for preventability of penetrating injuries included the following: illegal possession of a firearm, accidental discharge of a weapon, and suicide attempts. Statistics were performed with the paired Student t test and chi 2 with significance attributed to a P value less than .05. RESULTS: Spinal cord injury occurred in 150 patients; 71% of the injuries were the result of blunt trauma. Injury was potentially preventable in 74% of the blunt injuries and 66% of the penetrating injuries (P = .15). Patients with a penetrating SCI were younger (P < .001) and relied more on public funding than did those with a blunt SCI (65% vs 81%; P = .05). CONCLUSIONS: Most SCIs are preventable with strict enforcement of existing statutes. Furthermore, the financial burden of these preventable injuries is largely borne by the public.


Assuntos
Setor Público , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/economia , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/prevenção & controle , Cuidados Críticos/economia , Humanos , Prontuários Médicos , Setor Privado , Sistema de Registros , Reabilitação/economia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/reabilitação , Estados Unidos , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/economia , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/prevenção & controle , Ferimentos Penetrantes/economia , Ferimentos Penetrantes/prevenção & controle
8.
Ann Ophthalmol ; 18(1): 19-21, 1986 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3954295

RESUMO

Twenty-one patients admitted between 1977 and 1982 to the Medical College of Virginia were studied retrospectively for work-related eye injuries. This group comprised 7.7% of all eye-injury admissions. Patients suffered both blunt and penetrating injuries; penetrating injuries had poorer prognoses. Twenty of the 21 patients had not worn protective eyewear. The average per-patient cost related to ocular injury was $2946, and the average hospital stay was 6.4 days. In contrast, the one patient who had worn protective eyewear had ocular-related costs and hospitalization of only $350 and a one-day stay. Protective eyewear is important in lessening the severity of injury as well as decreasing the financial and psychologic burden to the patient, hospital, and employer.


Assuntos
Traumatismos Oculares , Doenças Profissionais , Adulto , Idoso , Traumatismos Oculares/economia , Traumatismos Oculares/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doenças Profissionais/economia , Doenças Profissionais/prevenção & controle , Estudos Retrospectivos , Acuidade Visual , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/economia , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/prevenção & controle
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA