Evaluating Firearm Violence After New Jersey's Cash Bail Reform.

Importance: Reducing the pretrial detention population has been a cornerstone of movements to end mass incarceration. Across many US cities, there are ongoing public debates on policies that would end pretrial detention due to the inability to afford bail, with some raising concerns that doing so would increase community violence. Objective: To evaluate changes in firearm violence after New Jersey's 2017 bail reform policy that eliminated financial barriers to avoiding pretrial detention. Design, Setting, and Participants: This case-control study used synthetic control methods to examine changes in firearm mortality and combined fatal and nonfatal shootings in New Jersey (2014-2019). New Jersey was chosen because it was one of the first states to systematically implement cash bail reform. Outcomes in New Jersey were compared with a weighted combination of 36 states that did not implement any kind of reform to pretrial detention during the study period. Data were analyzed from April 2023 to March 2024. Exposure: Implementation of New Jersey's cash bail reform law in 2017. Main Outcomes and Measures: Quarterly rates of fatal and nonfatal firearm assault injuries and firearm self-harm injuries per 100 000 people. Results: Although New Jersey's pretrial detention population dramatically decreased under bail reform, the study did not find evidence of increases in overall firearm mortality (average treatment effect on the treated, -0.26 deaths per 100 000) or gun violence (average treatment effect on the treated, -0.24 deaths per 100 000), or within racialized groups during the postpolicy period. Conclusions and Relevance: Incarceration and gun violence are major public health problems impacting racially and economically marginalized groups. Cash bail reform may be an important tool for reducing pretrial detention and advancing health equity without exacerbating community violence.

Discrepancies in Mass Shootings and Access to Trauma Care Across the United States, 2014-2018.

INTRODUCTION: The United States has one of the highest rates of gun violence and mass shootings. Timely medical attention in such events is critical. The objective of this study was to assess geographic disparities in mass shootings and access to trauma centers. METHODS: Data for all Level I and II trauma centers were extracted from the American College of Surgeons and the Trauma Center Association of America registries. Mass shooting event data (4+ individuals shot at a single event) were taken from the Gun Violence Archive between 2014 and 2018. RESULTS: A total of 564 trauma centers and 1672 mass shootings were included. Ratios of the number of mass shootings vs trauma centers per state ranged from 0 to 11.0 mass shootings per trauma center. States with the greatest disparity (highest ratio) included Louisiana and New Mexico. CONCLUSION: States in the southern regions of the US experience the greatest disparity due to a high burden of mass shootings with less access to trauma centers. Interventions are needed to increase access to trauma care and reduce mass shootings in these medically underserved areas.

The Medical Costs of Firearm Injuries in the United States: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Firearm injury poses a significant public health burden in the United States. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this systematic review was to provide a comprehensive accounting of the medical costs of firearm injuries in the United States. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted to identify studies published between January 1, 2000 and July 13, 2022 that reported medical costs of firearm injuries. A search of Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library databases was performed by a medical librarian. The National Institutes of Health Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies was used to evaluate for risk of bias. Health care-related charges and costs per firearm injury were presented and trends were identified. RESULTS: Sixty-four studies were included in the analysis. Study sample sizes ranged from 18 to 868,483 patients. Reported costs per injury ranged from $261 to $529,609. The median cost reported was $27,820 (interquartile range [IQR] $15,133-$40,124) and median charge reported was $53,832 (IQR $38,890-$98,632). Studies that divided initial hospitalization costs and follow-up medical costs identified that initial hospitalization accounts for about 60% of total costs. CONCLUSIONS: We found a significant volume of literature about the medical costs of firearm injury, which identified a highly heterogeneous cost burden. A significant amount of cost burden occurs after the index hospitalization, which is the only cost reported in most studies. Limitations of this study include reporting bias that favors hospitalized patients as well as a large focus on hospital charges as measurements of cost identified in the literature.

Social determinants of health in pediatric trauma: Associations with injury mechanisms and outcomes in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: Relationships between social determinants of health and pediatric trauma mechanisms and outcomes are unclear in context of COVID-19. METHODS: Children <16 years old injured between 2016 and 2021 from ten pediatric trauma centers in Florida were included. Patients were stratified by high vs. low Social Vulnerability Index (SVI). Injury mechanisms studied were child abuse, ATV/golf carts, and firearms. Mechanism incidence trends and mortality were evaluated by interrupted time series and multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 19,319 children, 68% and 32% had high and low SVI, respectively. Child abuse increased across SVI strata and did not change with COVID. ATV/golf cart injuries increased after COVID among children with low SVI. Firearm injuries increased after COVID among children with high SVI. Mortality was predicted by injury mechanism, but was not independently associated with SVI, race, or COVID. CONCLUSION: Social vulnerability influences pediatric trauma mechanisms and COVID effects. Child abuse and firearm injuries should be targeted for prevention.

Modification of Firearm Law-Firearm Injury Association by Economic Disadvantage.

INTRODUCTION: Firearm-related injuries in the U.S. have risen 37% since 2015. Understanding how the association between firearm incidents and state-level firearm restrictiveness is modified by community-level distress and economic connectedness (EC) may inform upstream injury prevention efforts. METHODS: A national cross-sectional study of firearm incidents (interpersonal and unintentional firearm events) occurring between 1/2015 and 12/2021 was performed using the Gun Violence Archive. The exposures were community distress (Distressed Communities Index, DCI), EC, and year-state-level firearm restrictiveness. The primary outcome was mean annual urban firearm incidence rate per ZIP Code Tabulation Area. Generalized linear mixed models were fit to evaluate the modification of the firearm law-firearm incident association by DCI and EC. Data analyses took place in 2022. RESULTS: About 266,020 firearm incidents were included. The mean rate was higher with each DCI tertile, with a RR of 3.18 (95% CI: 3.06, 3.30) in high versus low distress communities. Low EC was associated with over 1.8 times greater rate of firearm-related injury. The least restrictive firearm laws were associated with 1.20 times higher risk of firearm incidents (95% CI: 1.12, 1.28). The association between restrictive laws and lower incidence rates was strongest in low and medium distress and high EC communities. CONCLUSIONS: Stricter firearm laws are associated with lower rate of firearm incidents. The magnitude of this association is smallest for communities experiencing the greatest economic disadvantage.

Costs of Fatal and Nonfatal Firearm Injuries in the U.S., 2019 and 2020.

INTRODUCTION: Firearm-related injuries are among the five leading causes of death for people aged 1-44 years in the U.S. The immediate and long-term harms of firearm injuries pose an economic burden on society. Fatal and nonfatal firearm injury costs in the U.S. were estimated providing up-to-date economic burden estimates. METHODS: Counts of nonfatal firearm injuries were obtained from the 2019-2020 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Emergency Department Sample. Data on nonfatal injury intent were obtained from the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System - Firearm Injury Surveillance System. Counts of deaths (firearm as underlying cause) were obtained from the 2019-2020 multiple cause-of-death mortality data from the National Vital Statistics System. Analyses were conducted in 2023. RESULTS: The total cost of firearm related injuries and deaths in the U.S. for 2020 was $493.2 billion, a 16 percent increase compared with 2019. There are significant disparities in the cost of firearm deaths in 2019-2020, with non-Hispanic Black people, males, and young and middle-aged groups being the most affected. CONCLUSIONS: Most of the nonfatal firearm injury-related costs are attributed to hospitalization. These findings highlight the racial/ethnic differences in fatal firearm injuries and the disproportionate cost burden to urban areas. Addressing this important public health problem can help ameliorate the costs to our society from the rising rates of firearm injuries.

Factors Associated with Discharge to Skilled Nursing Facility Following Gunshot Wounds.

INTRODUCTION: Firearm injury is a public health crisis. Most victims are minorities in underserved neighborhoods. Measuring firearm injury by mortality underestimates its impact, as most victims survive to discharge. This study was done to determine if race and insurance status are associated with discharge disposition for gunshot wound (GSW)-related trauma. METHODS: Using the 2019 Trauma Quality Improvement Program database, we identified GSW patients with Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) = 1-3. Exclusion criteria included patients who died in hospital and routine home discharge. We compared discharge patterns of patients based on demographics (age, gender, race, ethnicity, payor, AIS, hospital designation, and length of stay [LOS]) and injury severity. Multivariable logistic regression models identified factors associated with discharge disposition. RESULTS: Our sample included 2437 patients with GSWs. On univariable analysis, Black patients were more likely to discharge to home with home health (64.1% Black versus 34.7% White; P < 0.001). White patients were more likely to discharge to skilled nursing facility (SNF) (51.4% White versus 44.6% Black; P < 0.001). Controlling for age, race, Latin ethnicity, primary payor, LOS, AIS severity, and injury severity score factors independently associated with discharge to SNF included age (0.0462, P < 0.001), Medicaid (1.136, P < 0.0003), Medicare (1.452, P < 0.001), and LOS (0.03745, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Postacute care following traumatic injuries is essential to recovery. Black GSW victims are more likely to be discharged to home health than White patients, who are more likely to be discharged to SNF. Targeted programs to reduce barriers to appropriate aftercare are necessary to eliminate this bias and improve the care of underserved populations.

Risk and Protective Factors for Firearm Assault Injuries Among Black Men: A Scoping Review of Research.

Black men are disproportionately affected by firearm assaults in the United States, and these disparities are rooted in structural and social inequities. The objective of this scoping review of research was to identify risk and protective factors for firearm assault injuries among Black men at all levels of the social-ecological framework. The search was conducted in 2021. The initial search generated 1,122 articles. Studies were eligible if they (a) included an analysis of modifiable risk or protective factors for firearm assaults among Black men; (b) reported an estimate of correlation, association, or effect between risk or protective factors and firearm assault injuries, firearm violence, and/or firearm homicides; and (c) were published peer-reviewed articles. In all, 19 articles were identified for review. Risk factors identified at each ecological level include the following: (1) Individual: firearm possession/weapon use and criminal legal system interaction; (2) Relationships: gang membership and exposure to other people who have experienced a firearm assault; (3) Community: indicators for socioeconomic status and racial residential segregation; and (4) Societal: historical racist policy. Individual-level substance use had mixed results. Few (26%) studies examined protective factors at any ecological level, but community-level factors like neighborhood tree cover were identified. Future research needs to examine risk and protective factors at the societal level and multiple ecological levels simultaneously leading to more effective multi-level interventions that will guide policy formation. A greater diversity of study designs, research methods, and theoretical frameworks is needed to better understand factors associated with firearm assault among Black men.

Health Care Utilization After Nonfatal Firearm Injuries.

OBJECTIVES: Despite the high incidence of firearm injuries, little is known about health care utilization after nonfatal childhood firearm injuries. This study aimed to describe health care utilization and costs after a nonfatal firearm injury among Medicaid and commercially insured youth using a propensity score matched analysis. METHODS: We conducted a propensity score matched cohort analysis using 2015 to 2018 Medicaid and Commercial Marketscan data comparing utilization in the 12-months post firearm injury for youth aged 0 to 17. We matched youth with a nonfatal firearm injury 1:1 to comparison noninjured youth on demographic and preindex variables. Outcomes included inpatient hospitalizations, emergency department (ED) visits, and outpatient visits as well as health care costs. Following propensity score matching, regression models estimated relative risks of the health care utilization outcomes, adjusting for demographic and clinical covariates. RESULTS: We identified 2110 youth with nonfatal firearm injury. Compared with matched noninjured youth, firearm injured youth had a 5.31-fold increased risk of inpatient hospitalization (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.93-7.20), 1.49-fold increased risk of ED visit (95% CI 1.37-1.62), and 1.06-fold increased risk of outpatient visit (95% CI 1.03-1.10) 12-months postinjury. Adjusted 12-month postindex costs were $7581 (95% CI $7581-$8092) for injured youth compared with $1990 (95% CI $1862-2127) for comparison noninjured youth. CONCLUSIONS: Youth who suffer nonfatal firearm injury have a significantly increased risk of hospitalizations, ED visits, outpatient visits, and costs in the 12 months after injury when compared with matched youth. Applied to the 11 258 US youth with nonfatal firearm injuries in 2020, estimates represent potential population health care savings of $62.9 million.

Mass shootings, firearm injuries, and mental health.

INTRODUCTION: The correlation between mass shootings, firearm injuries, and mental health is an ongoing polarized debate within the U.S., making it essential to develop public policy on mental illness and firearm injuries exacerbated by a significant increase in firearm sales in March 2020. Although many mass shooters are labeled "mentally ill," mental illness is only present in a small minority of cases. Most mentally ill people are never violent but are more likely to be the victims of violence. Easy access to firearms and a triggering event deriving from social and economic inequalities are primary causes of mass shootings and growing online radicalization. Radicalization can easily lead to fatal firearm injuries, particularly for individuals with diagnosed or undiagnosed mental illness. RECOMMENDATIONS: Proposed solutions include permits for firearms purchase, including a 25-year-old age limit, universal background checks, and banning large-capacity magazines. Additionally, a speedy and effective law enforcement response is the sole factor and the most reliable way to stop a mass shooting once it has started. The research identified several other recommendations, including expanding Medicare and mental health care access, expanding school safety and law enforcement training, and promoting public education about mental health and firearm safety.

National trends and resource associated with recurrent penetrating injury.

BACKGROUND: While recurrent penetrating trauma has been associated with long-term mortality and disability, national data on factors associated with reinjury remain limited. We examined temporal trends, patient characteristics, and resource utilization associated with repeat firearm-related or stab injuries across the US. METHODS: This was a retrospective study using 2010-2019 Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD). NRD was queried to identify all hospitalizations for penetrating trauma. Recurrent penetrating injury (RPI) was defined as those returned for a subsequent penetrating injury within 60 days. We quantified injury severity using the International Classification of Diseases Trauma Mortality Prediction model. Trends in RPI, length of stay (LOS), hospitalization costs, and rate of non-home discharge were then analyzed. Multivariable regression models were developed to assess the association of RPI with outcomes of interest. RESULTS: Of an estimated 968,717 patients (28.4% Gunshot, 71.6% Stab), 2.1% experienced RPI within 60 days of the initial injury. From 2010 to 2019, recurrent gunshot wounds increased in annual incidence while that of stab cohort remained stable. Patients experiencing recurrent gunshot wounds were more often male (88.9 vs 87.0%, P<0.001), younger (30 [23-40] vs 32 [24-44] years, P<0.001), and less commonly insured by Medicare (6.5 vs 11.2%, P<0.001) compared to others. Those with recurrent stab wounds were younger (36 [27-49] vs 44 [30-57] years, P<0.001), less commonly insured by Medicare (21.3 vs 29.3%, P<0.001), and had lower Elixhauser Index Comorbidities score (2 [1-3] vs 3 [1-4], P<0.001) compared to others. After risk adjustment, RPI of both gunshot and stab was associated with significantly higher hospitalization costs, a shorter time before readmission, and increased odds of non-home discharge. CONCLUSION: The trend in RPI has been on the rise for the past decade. National efforts to improve post-discharge prevention and social support services for patients with penetrating trauma are warranted and may reduce the burden of RPI.

Examining the Healthcare and Economic Burden of Gun Violence in a Major US Metropolitan City.

INTRODUCTION: The highest rates of fatal and nonfatal injury due to firearms occur in the Southern United States. This study examined the epidemiology of gunshot wound (GSW) injuries and the association of injury severity with mortality. METHODS: This is a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of 2016 to 2019 data from a mandatory reporting system for all licensed hospitals in Louisiana. Patients aged 18 years and older at the time of hospitalization for GSW were included. Injury severity was measured by the New Injury Severity Score (NISS). Primary outcomes assessed included mortality, length of stay, and total hospital charges. RESULTS: There were 1,709 firearm injuries identified. The patient sample was 83.2% Black and 87.4% male, with a mean age of 34 years. Orthopaedics was the most frequently consulted surgical service. Total hospital visit charges for all GSW-associated care were $262.4 million. The multivariable adjusted odds ratio and 95% confidence interval for mortality associated with a high NISS was 16.32 (8.96, 29.72). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated the utility of NISS as a predictor of total hospital charges and length of stay, in addition to its well-established role as a predictor of mortality. Epidemiologic trends in GSW pathologies and associated procedures at a major urban trauma center were also reported. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, prognostic study.

The Distressed Communities Index: A Measure of Community-Level Economic Deprivation and Rate of Firearm Injuries in Maryland.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between community-level economic deprivation, as measured by the Distressed Communities Index (DCI) and ED visits on account of firearm injuries (assaults and unintentional). METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted using the Maryland State Emergency Department Databases (SEDD) from January 2019 to December 2020 to explore the association between the DCI and ED visits because of firearm injuries (assaults and unintentional). The DCI utilizes 7 variables, based on zip codes, generating 5 levels of socioeconomic distress (prosperous, comfortable, mid-tier, at-risk, and distressed). In a multivariate analysis, we adjusted for age, sex, mental conditions, alcohol addiction, substance abuse, smoking, race/ethnicity, insurance type, and median income. RESULTS: Of the 2725 ED visits for firearm injuries, 84.5% were Black and 88.5% male. The median age was 27 (21-35) years, and the mortality rate was 17.7%. A statistically significant association was found between economic deprivation and ED visits for firearm injuries. Compared to prosperous communities, the odds ratios (ORs) were comfortable (OR = 1.33, 95% CI 1.04-1.71, P = .03), mid-tier (OR = 1.69, 95% CI 1.33-2.15, P < .001), at-risk (OR = 1.53, 95% CI 1.17-1.99, P < .001), and distressed (OR = 2.65, 95% CI 2.11-3.33, P < .001). DISCUSSION: The study highlights the significant association between community-level economic deprivation, as measured by the Distressed Communities Index, and the incidence of firearm injuries in Maryland. The findings underscore the importance of addressing socioeconomic disparities and implementing targeted interventions to reduce firearm-related injuries in economically distressed communities.

Disparities Associated with Discharge Patterns in Firearm-Associated Ocular Trauma.

Importance: Firearm injuries are associated with devastating visual outcomes. Several studies have demonstrated disparities in trauma care and discharge to rehabilitation and other advanced care facilities (ACFs) due to race and ethnicity and insurance status. The identification of possible disparities in disposition of patients admitted with firearms-associated ocular injuries (FAOIs) is a crucial step in moving toward health equity. Objective: To describe disposition patterns following admission for FAOI trauma. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective analysis of National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) from 2008 through 2014 used hospitalized trauma cases from over 900 US facilities detailed in the NTDB. Participants included patients admitted with ocular injuries. Statistical analysis was conducted between April 16, 2017, and December 15, 2021. Exposure: Firearm injuries. Main Outcomes and Measures: Patients admitted with FAOIs were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnostic codes and E-codes. Demographic data, location, injury type and severity, and insurance status were documented. The primary outcome was the odds of discharge to ACFs. Results: A total of 8715 of 235 254 firearms injuries involved the eye (3.7%). Of the 8715 included patients, 7469 were male (85.7%), 3050 were African American (35.0%), and 4065 White (46.6%), with a mean (SD) age of 33.8 (16.9) years. Common payments were government insurance (31.5%), self-paid insurance (29.4%), and commercial insurance plans (22.8%). Frequent dispositions were home (48.8%) and ACF (20.5%). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the following factors were associated with the highest odds of discharge to an ACF: hospital stays 6 days or longer (odds ratio [OR], 3.05; 95% CI, 2.56-3.63; P < .001), age 65 years or older (OR, 2.94; 95% CI, 1.94-4.48; P < .001), associated traumatic brain injury (OR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.94-2.78; P < .001), severe traumatic brain injury (OR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.79-2.46; P < .001), and very severe Injury Severity Score (OR, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.88-2.62; P < .001). White race (OR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.71-2.33; P < .001) was associated with higher odds than Medicare insurance (OR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.16-2.31; P = .01). Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that older, more severely injured, Medicare-insured, or White patients have higher odds of ACF placement than younger, less severely injured, otherwise insured, and Black and Hispanic patients. This study is limited by its retrospective nature and the study team was unable to explore the basis for these disposition differences. Nevertheless, this work highlights that disparities may exist in disposition after FAOIs that may limit the rehabilitation potential of specific populations.

Racial equity in trauma injury: An unresolved enigma.

BACKGROUND: Racial disparities in healthcare have been attributed to socioeconomic inequalities while the relative risk (RR) of traumatic injury in people of color has yet to be described. METHODS: Demographics of our patient population were compared to the population of our service area. The racial and ethnic identities of gunshot wound (GSW) and motor vehicle collision (MVC) patients were used to establish RR of traumatic injury adjusting for socioeconomic status defined by payor mix and geography. RESULTS: GSW assaults were more common in Blacks (59.1%) while self-inflicted GSWs were more common in Whites (46.2%). RR of having a GSW was 4.65 times greater (95% CI 4.03-5.37; p < 0.01) among Blacks than other populations. MVC patients were 36.8% Black, 26.6% White, and 32.6% Hispanic. Blacks had an increased risk of MVC compared to other races (RR 2.13; 95% CI 1.96-2.32; p < 0.01). The racial and ethnic identity of the patient was not a predictor of GSW or MVC mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Increased risk of GSW and MVC was not correlated with local population demographics or socioeconomic status.

An Ounce of Prevention is the Only Cure: Nationwide Clinical and Financial Outcomes of Self-Inflicted Firearm Injuries.

BACKGROUND: Self-inflicted gunshot wounds (SIGSWs) remain a leading, preventable cause of death in the United States. The present study evaluated patient demographics, operative characteristics, in-hospital outcomes, and resource utilization between patients with SIGSW and other GSW. METHODS: The 2016-2020 National Inpatient Sample was queried for patients ≥16 years old admitted following gunshot wounds. Patients were categorized as SIGSW if they were injured through self-harm. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the association of SIGSW on outcomes. The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality with complications, costs, and length of stay secondarily considered. RESULTS: Of an estimated 157,795 surviving to hospital admission, 14,670 (9.30%) were SIGSW. Self-inflicted gunshot wounds were more commonly female (18.1 vs 11.3%), insured by Medicare (21.1 vs 5.0%), and white (70.8 vs 22.3%) (all P < .001) compared to non-SIGSW. Psychiatric illness was more prevalent in SIGSW (46.0 vs 6.6%, P < .001). Additionally, SIGSW more frequently underwent neurologic (10.7 vs 2.9%) and facial operations (12.5 vs 3.2%) (both P < .001). After adjustment, SIGSW was associated with greater odds of mortality (AOR: 12.4, 95% CI: 10.4-14.7). Length of stay (ß: +1.5 days, 95% CI: .8-2.1) and costs (ß: +$3.6 K, 95% CI: 1.4-5.7) were significantly greater in SIGSW. CONCLUSIONS: Self-inflicted gunshot wounds are associated with increased mortality compared to other GSW, likely due to the increased proportion of injuries in the head and neck region. This lethality, coupled with the high prevalence of psychiatric illness in this population, indicates that efforts must be made to intervene through primary prevention, including enhanced screening and weapon safety considerations for those at risk.

Association of insurance status with financial toxicity and outcome disparities after penetrating trauma and assault.

BACKGROUND: Financial toxicity, or the impact out-of-pocket medical expenses have on the quality of life, has not been widely enumerated in the trauma literature. We characterized the relationship between insurance status and the risk of financial toxicity after trauma and associated risk factors. METHODS: Adults admitted for gunshot wounds, other penetrating injuries, or blunt assault were identified from the 2015 to 2019 National Inpatient Sample. The outcome of interest was a risk of financial toxicity with separate regression models for uninsured and insured populations. RESULTS: Of an estimated 775,665 patients, 21.2% were at risk of financial toxicity. Patients at risk of financial toxicity were younger, more commonly male, less commonly White, and had a lower Elixhauser Index (Table 1). A higher proportion of uninsured patients were at risk of financial toxicity (40.8% vs 17.7%, P < .001) than insured patients. Whereas the proportion of uninsured patients at risk of financial toxicity significantly increased from 2015 to 2019, it was unchanged in insured patients. After adjustment, non-income demographic and clinical factors were not associated with the risk of financial toxicity amongst the insured. Conversely, the Black or Hispanic race, gunshot wounds, and any in-hospital complications were some factors associated with increased risk of financial toxicity in uninsured patients. CONCLUSION: An increasingly larger proportion of uninsured patients are at risk of financial toxicity after trauma. The risk of financial toxicity among the uninsured was more complex than in the insured and associated with race, gunshot wounds, and complications. Increasing insurance access and the adoption of trauma-informed care practices should be used to address financial toxicity in this population.

Assessment of Firearm Storage Practices in the US, 2022.

Importance: Secure firearm storage may help reduce firearm injury and death. Broad implementation requires more granular assessments of firearm storage practices and greater clarity on circumstances that may prevent or promote the use of locking devices. Objective: To develop a more thorough understanding of firearm storage practices, obstacles to using locking devices, and circumstances in which firearm owners would consider locking unsecured firearms. Design, Setting, and Participants: A cross-sectional, nationally representative survey of adults residing in 5 US states who owned firearms was administered online between July 28 and August 8, 2022. Participants were recruited via probability-based sampling. Main Outcomes and Measures: Firearm storage practices were assessed via a matrix provided to participants in which firearm-locking devices were described both via text and images. Locking mechanisms (key/personal identification number [PIN]/dial vs biometric) were specified for each type of device. Obstacles to the use of locking devices and circumstances in which firearm owners would consider locking unsecured firearms were assessed via self-report items developed by the study team. Results: The final weighted sample included 2152 adult (aged ≥18 years), English-speaking firearm owners residing in the US; the sample was predominantly male (66.7%). Among the 2152 firearm owners, 58.3% (95% CI, 55.9%-60.6%) reported storing at least 1 firearm unlocked and hidden, with 17.9% (95% CI, 16.2%-19.8%) reporting storing at least 1 firearm unlocked and unhidden. Gun safes were the most frequently used device both among participants who use keyed/PIN/dial locking mechanisms (32.4%; 95% CI, 30.2%-34.7%) and those who use biometric locking mechanisms (15.6%; 95% CI, 13.9%-17.5%). Those who do not store firearms locked most frequently noted a belief that locks are unnecessary (49.3%; 95% CI, 45.5%-53.1%) and a fear that locks would prevent quick access in an emergency (44.8%; 95% CI, 41.1%-48.7%) as obstacles to lock usage. Preventing access by children was the most often reported circumstance in which firearm owners would consider locking unsecured firearms (48.5%; 95% CI, 45.6%-51.4%). Conclusions and Relevance: In this survey study of 2152 firearm owners, consistent with prior research, unsecure firearm storage was common. Firearm owners appeared to prefer gun safes relative to cable locks and trigger locks, indicating that locking device distribution programs may not match firearm owners' preferences. Broad implementation of secure firearm storage may require addressing disproportionate fears of home intruders and increasing awareness of the risks associated with household firearm access. Furthermore, implementation efforts may hinge on broader awareness of the risks of ready firearm access beyond unauthorized access by children.

A Nationwide Analysis of Gunshot Wounds of the Head and Neck: Morbidity, Mortality, and Cost.

BACKGROUND: Gun violence in the United States rose continuously from 2010 to 2022, spiking during the pandemic, and peaking in 2021 at 48,830 deaths (14.8 per 100,000). Previous reports investigated health and financial burden associated with gunshot wounds (GSWs) during 2004 to 2013; however estimates related specifically to head and neck (H&N) injuries have been lacking. This population-based study aims to examine incidence, morbidity, mortality, and health resource utilization of H&N injuries utilizing the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database. METHODS: A population-based study was undertaken using the National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample (NIS) database (2015Q4-2017Q4). The International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes were used to create a composite variable (inclusive of brain, eye, facial nerve, and facial fractures) resulting from GSW to the H&N. Incidence per 100,000 hospitalizations and case fatality rates were calculated to determine the health burden of H&N injuries. Length of hospital stay, and inflation- adjusted hospital charges were compared among H&N and non-H&N injuries. Χ 2 (classical and bootstrapped) and Mann-Whitney tests were used to compare groups. RESULTS: Of 101,300 injuries caused by firearms, 16,140 injuries (15.9%) involved H&N region. The average incidence of H&N injuries was 20.1 cases per 100,000 hospitalizations, with intentional injuries having the highest case fatality rates of 32.4%. Patients with H&N injuries had extreme loss of function (33.4% versus 18.3%, P <0.001) and extreme likelihood of mortality (27.0% versus 11.3%, P <0.001) than non-H&N injuries. Statistically significant differences in the median length of stay (4.8 d versus 3.7 d; P <0.001) and median inflation-adjusted hospital charges ($80,743 versus $58,946, P <0.001) were found among H&N and non-H&N injuries. CONCLUSIONS: Injuries due to GSW remain an inordinate health care and financial burden, with trauma to the H&N carrying an especially high cost in dollars, morbidity, and mortality.

The Cost of Gunshot Wounds to the Head: An Unevenly Distributed Burden.

BACKGROUND: Despite the significant clinical consequences and socioeconomic costs of gunshot wounds to the head (GSWH), studies examining prehospital risk factors, geospatial patterns, and economic cost are lacking. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed for patients with GSWH (single or multiple injuries) presenting to the level one Ryder Trauma Center (hospital patients) as well as the Miami-Dade County Medical Examiner (ME) Department, from October 2013 to October 2015. In addition, ME data were queried from the previous decade (2008-2017) to analyze longitudinal trends. RESULTS: A total of 402 consecutive patients met the inclusion criteria: 297 (74%) presented to the ME and 105 (26%) presented to the hospital. GSWH in our cohort had a case fatality rate of 89%, predominantly affecting males, whites, and individuals who committed suicide, with a mean age of 41.9 ± 20.6 years. Hospital patients were more likely to be black males from low socioeconomic status (SES) regions involved in assault. Older white males were overrepresented in patients attempting and completing suicide and thus comprised a higher percentage of ME cases. Geospatial analysis of hospital patient injury zip codes shows that GSWH are significantly clustered in low-income urban centers with greater poverty rates. In Miami-Dade County, the economic burden of GSWH, as measured by total health care costs and lifetime productivity losses, was estimated to be $11,867,415 and $246,179,498, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In the first analysis of GSWH with the inclusion of both hospital and ME data in a representative urban setting, our findings show prehospital risk factors and the unequal distribution of the significant economic costs of GSWH.