Effect of duration of gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist on the outcome of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer in a short-acting long regimen.

Objective: To investigate the effect of the duration of gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) use on the outcome of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) during the short-acting long-term hyperstimulation cycle. Methodology: Clinical data from 776 patients receiving controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) after short-term regimen downregulation were retrospectively analyzed. According to the duration of GnRH-a, the patients were divided into 3 groups: Group A, 14 days for GnRH-a; Group B, 15-17 days for GnRH-a; and Group C, >18 days for GnRH-a. The clinical data, treatment and clinical outcomes were compared among the groups. Results: There were no significant differences in fertilization rate, implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, abortion rate, ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) rate(P > 0.05). The total costs in group A were significantly less than those in group B and C(P < 0.001). The number of eggs and quality embryos generated in group A was significantly higher than that in groups B and C (P = 0.014, P = 0.005). Conclusions: In the short-acting GnRH agonist long protocol, satisfactory IVF-ET pregnancy outcome was obtained with the use of GnRH-a for 14 days under the premise of lowering the receptor-regulating standard. Excessive application of GnRH-a will affect the number of eggs and embryos and increase the cost of medical treatment.

Economic Evaluation of Three Frequently Used Gonadotrophins in Assisted Reproduction Techniques in the Management of Infertility in the Netherlands.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Subfertility represents a multidimensional problem associated with significant distress and impaired social well-being. In the Netherlands, an estimated 50,000 couples visit their general practitioner and 30,000 couples seek medical specialist care for subfertility. We conducted an economic evaluation comparing recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (follitropin alfa, r-hFSH, Gonal-F®) with two classes of urinary gonadotrophins-highly purified human menopausal gonadotrophin (hp-HMG, Menopur®) and urinary follicle-stimulating hormone (uFSH, Fostimon®)-for ovarian stimulation in women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment in the Netherlands. METHODS: A pharmacoeconomic model was developed, simulating each step in the IVF protocol from the start of therapy until either a live birth, a new IVF treatment cycle or cessation of IVF, following a long down-regulation protocol. A decision tree combined with a Markov model details progress through each health state, including ovum pickup, fresh embryo transfer, up to two subsequent cryo-preserved embryo transfers, and (ongoing) pregnancy or miscarriage. A health insurer perspective was chosen, and the time horizon was set at a maximum of three consecutive treatment cycles, in accordance with Dutch reimbursement policy. Transition probabilities and costing data were derived from a real-world observational outcomes database (from Germany) and official tariff lists (from the Netherlands). Adverse events were considered equal among the comparators and were therefore excluded from the economic analysis. A Monte Carlo simulation of 5000 iterations was undertaken for each strategy to explore uncertainty and to construct uncertainty intervals (UIs). All cost data were valued in 2013 Euros. The model's structure, parameters and assumptions were assessed and confirmed by an external clinician with experience in health economics modelling, to inform on the appropriateness of the outcomes and the applicability of the model in the chosen setting. RESULTS: The mean total treatment costs were estimated as €5664 for follitropin alfa (95 % UI €5167-6151), €5990 for hp-HMG (95 % UI €5498-6488) and €5760 for uFSH (95 % UI €5256-6246). The probability of a live birth was estimated at 36.1 % (95 % UI 27.4-44.3 %), 33.9 % (95 % UI 26.2-41.5 %) and 34.1 % (95 % UI 25.9-41.8 %) for follitropin alfa, hp-HMG and uFSH, respectively. The costs per live birth estimates were €15,674 for follitropin alfa, €17,636 for hp-HMG and €16,878 for uFSH. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated a probability of 72.5 % that follitropin alfa is cost effective at a willingness to pay of €20,000 per live birth. The probabilistic results remained constant under several analyses. CONCLUSION: The present analysis shows that follitropin alfa may represent a cost-effective option in comparison with uFSH and hp-HMG for IVF treatment in the Netherlands healthcare system.

Thyroxine replacement during super-ovulation for in vitro fertilization: a potential gap in management?

OBJECTIVE: Our objective is to report observed changes in thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) in two patients undergoing super-ovulation for IVF. DESIGN: Case report. SETTING: Private assisted reproduction practices. PATIENT(S): Two hypothyroid women taking thyroxine replacement therapy undergoing super-ovulation for IVF. INTERVENTION(S): Laboratory records for TSH taken during ovulation induction cycles were retrieved retrospectively for six cycles and measured prospectively for one cycle each in both women. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): To document changes in thyroid status during super-ovulation. RESULT(S): Despite being euthyroid at the start of the super-ovulation cycle, both patients demonstrated a rise in TSH to hypothyroid levels during ovulation induction, even in the absence of ongoing pregnancy. CONCLUSION(S): High circulating E(2) during super-ovulation for IVF induces increased thyroxine-binding globulin binding of thyroxine. In women taking thyroxine replacement therapy, hypothyroidism develops during a super-ovulation cycle. Whether such acute biochemical hypothyroidism is a hindrance to ovum quality, fertilization, conception, or ongoing pregnancy and whether thyroxine dose adjustment during a super-ovulation cycle would improve IVF outcomes requires further study. These case studies identify a potential management gap in assisted reproduction for women taking thyroxine therapy.

Sedation and analgesia for transvaginal oocyte retrieval: an audit resulting in a change of clinical practice.

The aim was to audit the standard of care at oocyte retrieval with respect to the analgesia used. Before June 1999, a combination of intramuscular pethidine and prochlorperazine was given as a single dose. Many women found this to be unsatisfactory and requested general anaesthesia for subsequent oocyte retrievals. An intravenous sedation and analgesia regimen was introduced using a combination of midazolam and fentanyl. The introduction of this regimen was audited and compared with the established regimen. This study describes the experience with this technique, its patient acceptability, safety and cost implications.